No video

A Look At The Panasonic Leica 100-400mm Long Zoom Lens For Micro four Thirds Cameras

  Рет қаралды 207,541

David Thorpe

David Thorpe

8 жыл бұрын

The Panasonic Leica 100-400mm is a mighty long lens. With this, if you hear the cry 'Up in the sky, look! it's a bird! it's a plane!' you'll be the guy or gal who says 'it's Superman!'. And you'll have a shot a portrait of him in flight to prove it.
----------
Help keep my channel going - Buy though my Amazon shop at
www.amazon.co....
In association with ePHOTOzine - www.ephotozine.com
Sound post production by Charles Walkowski at www.walkowski.co.uk
See my M43 blog at m43blog.dthorpe...

Пікірлер: 486
@raksh9
@raksh9 9 ай бұрын
At least we still have these videos of David. I'm currently considering this lens, and David's advice continues to be helpful. 😢❤
@paulsebring5326
@paulsebring5326 6 ай бұрын
here here
@JohnRussellHodge_progtwit
@JohnRussellHodge_progtwit 5 ай бұрын
My thoughts entirely. I hope David is out in the Andes taking that sequence for National Geographic if they won’t accept those of his neighbours’ roof. What a lovely man he must have been.
@trevorburton4429
@trevorburton4429 4 ай бұрын
And I was able to buy one of his books from Amazon. Hope his family benefit financially.
@zayacz123
@zayacz123 2 жыл бұрын
I miss David! Rest In Peace good soul!
@TomeRodrigo
@TomeRodrigo 2 жыл бұрын
What happened?
@zayacz123
@zayacz123 2 жыл бұрын
@@TomeRodrigo He died from a long illness about a year ago.
@cmck1777
@cmck1777 3 жыл бұрын
New favourite KZfaqr hands down. No music; no ‘what’s up guys’ BS; a script, a personality and well chosen visuals. I love it.
@stevenbirds2920
@stevenbirds2920 4 ай бұрын
I wonder if David had any idea how much his audience looked forward to him releasing another video and how well liked and appreciated he was. A wonderfully engaging voice and someone of the master of this kind of thing. Much missed.
@conradsenior5843
@conradsenior5843 7 жыл бұрын
I buy most of my lenses used. It's telling that this lens never is available used. The buyers must really love and treasure these lenses.
@formermpc10
@formermpc10 6 ай бұрын
This is one lens I would never buy used based on its history of bad copies.
@rayjenkins2754
@rayjenkins2754 2 жыл бұрын
Great perspectives from this review. 2 years ago I bought the G9 - on sale at $1000 & the Leica 100 - 400mm that was also on sale @ $1400. I found it's zoom ring to be on the stiff side so I called the camera store who said to bring the lens back in one week & they would have 3 other new 100 - 400mm Leica units for me to try. In Mikes Camera store a week later, out of the 3, one lens' zoom ring was quite smooth. Enjoy your vids & your book on the Pany G9.
@jaffarbh
@jaffarbh 8 жыл бұрын
David, I take it that you write poems too! Listening to your speech is a real joy. Many thanks.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Jaffar, what can I say? I'm flattered - and thank you!
@NeoDon1
@NeoDon1 2 жыл бұрын
I miss your reviews and voice David,
@dbcooper7326
@dbcooper7326 2 жыл бұрын
R.I.P David
@aarontawad
@aarontawad 8 жыл бұрын
I have no desire to get into the M43 system but I do enjoy listening to David's soothing voice. Kind of like ASMR but informative!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
I just talk like I do, so it's nice to know you like it - thanks!
@JM-mi2ew
@JM-mi2ew 4 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately unless you're a licensed photographer most camera stores around here will not sell you anything but M43 and APS-C based cameras. So we're "stuck" with m43 for now.
@jagatic
@jagatic 8 жыл бұрын
would love to see those show offfy photos!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Sorry, Joseph, I seem to have mislaid them. How inconvenient!
@conradsenior5843
@conradsenior5843 7 жыл бұрын
You are hilarious. Love the bit about diving condors over Machu Picchu. I laughed out loud. Keep these reviews coming. You do the best job of any reviewer.
@TarekMidani
@TarekMidani 3 жыл бұрын
I second that 😂
@harrisedgar
@harrisedgar 6 жыл бұрын
David... I've watched this review since you uploaded it, and I was surprised to realize that I've never commented how good it is..!!! Thank you.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for taking the trouble, Edgar. Much appreciated.
@16-bit-trip5
@16-bit-trip5 8 жыл бұрын
Great review David! I recently sold off my micro 4/3 kit (and Nikon FX kit) to move to the Fuji X system but I still enjoy watching your reviews. You are certainly one of my favorite reviewers along with The Camera Store guys and Christopher Frost.
@guardianobserver6593
@guardianobserver6593 8 жыл бұрын
You won the lottery ehh?
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks Michael - I like the Camera Store guys too. They don't take themselves too seriously and seem to enjoy what they do. I don't know Christopher Frost, I must take a look and nick his best ideas :-)
@2nd3rd1st
@2nd3rd1st 7 жыл бұрын
This is by far my most desired lens right now. I'm ages away from being able to afford one but when I got it I'll move to Africa and become a Safari guide just to use its full potential.
@larbueno
@larbueno 6 жыл бұрын
Your reviews are so pleasantly non-tech, but still your knowledge of optical equipment is evident. Thanks for the many soothing reviews over time, Sir David!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Larry. Especially for the knighthood. I am now searching for a damsel in distress :-)
@onthemove301
@onthemove301 Жыл бұрын
I bought one after watching this review and was very pleased. Later sold it for an Olympus 300mm f4 which, on my OM1, has body and lens stabilisation. I miss these reviews these days, they were on a different level to the average m43 knocking stuff.
@peacefulpony
@peacefulpony 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks for buying the entire m43 ecosystem David!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
I haven't bought all of it. I haven't got the official Olympus hood for my 45mm :-)
@Xtr4s4
@Xtr4s4 8 жыл бұрын
David: What about Olympus 75mm 1.8. ;)
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
You've got me there, Stefan :-) Oh well, rob another bank, I guess!
@Raychristofer
@Raychristofer 6 жыл бұрын
Gasso Desec isn't it interesting how that 75mm cost almost as much as a g85? I'm not sure what to say about that
@larbueno
@larbueno 6 жыл бұрын
David said it was the best m43 he'd never buy. I hope someone gives one to him!
@richardyasushiii3848
@richardyasushiii3848 8 жыл бұрын
Awesome review, David - as usual. I was looking at getting this lens but wasn't sure. Now, I'm sold. Thanks, mate!
@zepps46
@zepps46 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you David a beautifully presented review as always.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Alan!
@danieldougan269
@danieldougan269 4 жыл бұрын
I have rented both this lens and the Olympus 300mm f4. This lens was very good, but the Olympus lens was spectacular, partly because it's extra stop of light at 300 enabled me to use a lower ISO. I often find myself struggling with noise when I go out birding on cloudy days. And, since I already own the MC-14 and MC-20 teleconverters for my 40-150, I could overcome the distance problem as well. Now for the money to buy it.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 4 жыл бұрын
I haven't tried the Olympus 300mm but all the Pro series lenses are superb. There do seem to be some deals around on the 300mm at the moment, some of them quite enticing.
@kiaguy47
@kiaguy47 8 жыл бұрын
Another informative and entertaining review! This is why I love the micro 4/3 system, a massive 200-800mm telephoto focal length in a compact size.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Exactly my thoughts!
@orange42
@orange42 Жыл бұрын
Remembering David in 2022 ❤
@jcflippen1552
@jcflippen1552 7 жыл бұрын
Love the neighbour's roof and the review - 100-400 Sold!
@JB-xv8my
@JB-xv8my 7 жыл бұрын
You know, without the traditional shots of your neighbor's roof I would think that I'm watching the wrong channel. I don't even own mft gear any more, but remain subbed purely for the enjoyment of these lovely reviews. All the best, and keep going.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
It is such pleasure for me to read that, Jayne! Thanks isn't enough but it's all I can say.
@EmoEmu
@EmoEmu 7 жыл бұрын
This lens makes me want to get an M43 camera. I've felt like getting a full frame 150-600 lens since they started showing up, but whenever I see the size or think about the weight I come to my senses.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
Those big zooms for FF really are intimidating. You need a separate bag just for the lens and hand holding one for any length of time is quite a feat. Both Micro Four Thirds and FF formats have their pluses but a defining one for me is the Micro Four Thirds lens sizes.
@EmoEmu
@EmoEmu 7 жыл бұрын
Yeah, my back issues have been telling me to consider the M43 system in future. I think it might be right.
@soundknight
@soundknight 8 жыл бұрын
Olympus has some good looking new lenses and a new flash too. I'd like to see the new Oly 25mm f1.2
@bradsey
@bradsey 8 жыл бұрын
Great review, I love my lens. Zoom ring started out a bit stiff but has loosened over time.
@danieldougan8613
@danieldougan8613 6 жыл бұрын
7:06 well we know where David's mind was!
@dhedc
@dhedc 8 жыл бұрын
I on't own this lens but recently tried it at a camera shop in Anchorage. I loved it. The zoom action was not tight once I ensured the lock was fully disengaged. I recently bought a Sony RX10 III for an all in one zoom out to 600mm and have been pleased with the results. The Sony has a 1 inch sensor but performed well. I still want this lens but doubt I will buy it. Great review.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks, David. Lots of scope for using a long lens in your part of the world. I winder if the zoom action would stiffen up in an Alaska -10c winters day :-0
@TopGarageTV
@TopGarageTV 3 жыл бұрын
RIP Mr. Thorpe. A true professional.
@DanOhPhotography
@DanOhPhotography 8 жыл бұрын
Mine has stiff zoom ring ... lots of people have complained, BUT I use 400mm almost 95% to take birds so its not a big deal for me. I push / pull to zoom in and out rather than turning the ring. This lens really is for the wildlife photographer and not a portrait lens. As you said it is a specialty lens. It is REALLY sharp. Image stabilization, focusing speed, tripod collar, infinity limiter ... all fantastic for the wildlife photographer!
@lindamcmullin785
@lindamcmullin785 8 жыл бұрын
Dan, at 100mm, I've taken some absolutely beautiful portrait type photos, just sayin'. For the most part, though, I agree that it's for wildlife. :-) I had not thought to push/pull to zoom rather than using the zoom ring. I'll have to try that. Thx!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Yes, a beauty of a lens but you need to have a use for it to justify it. I didn't find the zoom ring a problem as such but I'd prefer a smooth and lighter action. Bird photography really does push at the extremes of what a camera (and photographer) can do.
@lindamcmullin785
@lindamcmullin785 8 жыл бұрын
Hello, David! I was thrilled to see the notification in my inbox for this video! I own this lens and would love, love, LOVE, to see your show-off-y photos of birds in flight and any other photo you deem interesting. This very day I've been over to Lake Whitney, Tx, down below the dam, practicing my technique with the elusive flying birds...LOL. Everything you said about the lens has been what I've found to be true. It's sharp, fast, and image quality is fantastic. My zoom ring has loosened up a lot, but still pretty tight from 300mm to 400mm. It's not smooth during that last range, but like you, I keep it at 400mm all the time and reluctantly zoom in. Thanks for the review, and please post pics from this lens. Thank you!!!!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
I have to confess, Linda, that I was joking about the bird pictures. Birds are impossible and I take my hat off to the photographers who master the art of photographing them. I spoke to various birds and even offered them money to cooperate but they seemed disinterested. Almost as bad as cats, really.
@yodamunkey
@yodamunkey 6 жыл бұрын
I've watched this review twice in a week. That's how excellent you are at doing these.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 6 жыл бұрын
I'm flattered - and glad you enjoy the vids!
@LookatBowen
@LookatBowen 5 жыл бұрын
Just back from a birding holiday in Costa Rica and how I wish I had this lens, especially with all the humming birds, vultures, hawks, eagles, surfers, etc. I made do with my all purpose Panasonic 14-140mm. Great review of this lens, I'll definitely be getting this lens before my next birding holiday.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 5 жыл бұрын
Great for birders, that's for sure and very close focusing for the tiny hummingbirds, too.
@craigroethler1495
@craigroethler1495 5 жыл бұрын
Splendid humor with discerning commentary as usual.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Craig!
@photohiker81
@photohiker81 8 жыл бұрын
David, thanks for your grate M43 reviews. I like your sense of humour and the objective information.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks CG, and for telling me!
@JohnyTechReview
@JohnyTechReview 7 жыл бұрын
Just randomly foudn you. Very nice review with awesome narration! And Damn it! give us the Showoffy Condor PIX!!!
@orange42
@orange42 8 жыл бұрын
lol that sequence at 6:55 I picked up my copy on release and have used it non stop since; rugby and the birds that don't ride bikes. I'll have to pick up a second body just so I don't have to swap it out.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
:-) - If you put a 14-140 on that other body, you's sweep a focal range form 14-400mm. Wow!
@orange42
@orange42 8 жыл бұрын
David Thorpe I tend to go straight to my 25mm 1.4 on the Rugby field. (Edit: or the 12-35). Close up arty pics vs the stuff on the other side. Having said that I note the 14-140 is one of the two lenses that is already up to date for the IBISv2 coming out on the newer bodies. They didn't stay at IBISv1 very long :O
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
I'll be interested to see if Panasonic ever catch up on Olympus's IBIS - according to the latest reports, the upcoming E_M1 Mk2 will give 6.5 stops stabilization. I second hand held on the 100-400mm anyone? How will photographers keep the birds - or rugby players - still that long, though!
@tomvideasta
@tomvideasta 7 жыл бұрын
Or better the Oly 12-100!!!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
Oof! £2,500 on two lenses. What lenses though!
@reg171reg
@reg171reg 8 жыл бұрын
You are the second reviewer to suggest a stiff zoom. Mine is really nice. I wonder if the zoom lock is not backing off far enough. I'm happy with mine in good light. Another great review.
@abukalamrami
@abukalamrami 8 жыл бұрын
Another kick ass review David Thorpe! Love your sense of humour and take on this
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks Rami - this was a very enjoyable review to do.
@drillthrallable
@drillthrallable 8 жыл бұрын
Another fine review I'd been waiting on. Thanks, David. My state park bird searches will really benefit from this lens and a 5 axis IBIS Panasonic camera, especially in the many darker areas of the parks, 1/30sec sorts of dark. My GH2, GX7, and GH4 with the Pana 100-300 have all served my bird hobby well, but IBIS and this new lens will make a real actual difference for these 56 year old hands.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the kind words. Yes, the stabilization makes a massive difference to using a lens like this. I wouldn't want to rely on shots at 1/30th but it is possible. I found My hands are pretty shaky and always have been so the better the stabilization the better for me.
5 жыл бұрын
I was thinking of selling my 100-400mm because I haven't been using it for quite some time... and it appears that I am a bird shooter by no means... but after your video I found some inspiration for using this lens for applications I hadn't thought of before. I think it will stay with me! Thank you! :)
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 5 жыл бұрын
That's nice, Piotr, thanks! I just love the extreme tele effects you can get with this lens, it can make ordinary scenes look extraordinary.
@overnightdelivery
@overnightdelivery 7 жыл бұрын
Olympus and Panasonic make it so tough to decide which route to go. I have the Panasonic 35-100 F2.8 and decided to also get this Panasonic 100-400mm. I spent around $2500 for this combination. I got it because for planes and flying birds, you really can't have 'enough' zoom. However you can get away with 200mm or even 150mm most of the time if your subjects are at reasonable altitudes. From a financial and practical standpoint the Olympus makes more sense as you obviously can buy the Olympus 2.8 Zoom with a Teleconverter for considerably less than the 35-100, 100-400 Panasonic Combo. I really got into taking action shots at my nieces sporting events with the Panasonic 35-100 2.8. It takes amazing shots but always wish I had another 50-100mm, so I didn't have to crop my photos so much for distant shots. You can use the 400mm Panasonic but then you need very high ISO at F6.3 and would almost be better off cropping a 150mm F2.8 shot. The Panasonic 400mm is a no-brainer if you're in sunny outdoor conditions but not so much indoors. Overall I still like the combo I picked, as it covers everything you could ever need. However if you are primarily an Action shooter and not that into wildlife/very distant subjects.. I agree with David and say the Olympus better fits the bill in terms of practicality. Aaargh decisions, decisions lol.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
Yes, decisions, decisions and they never seem clear cut. The 100-400 is quite a specialist lens and since I don't do birds and planes much, the 40-150 + converter is the best bet for me. As you say, there's always the possibility to crop but then you could crop at 400mm and get an even bigger image! It'd be great if the 100-400 was a constant f/4 but that would carry a big weight, size and price penalty. Decisions, decisions, as you say!
@zoomfx777
@zoomfx777 8 жыл бұрын
Another well thought out and delivered review. Like I've told you before you're the best reviewer on KZfaq. I too will most likely rent this beast when I need it. My bag is already heavy with all the lenses you have recommended to us. CHEERS!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Cheers to you and thanks!
@schex86
@schex86 6 жыл бұрын
Just picked this lens up used during the recent Ebay sale, fortunately the zoom action is very smooth on my copy. Its noticeably heavier and bulkier than the 100-300, but the photos do seem to be sharper. With all the extras, and faster focusing, the 100-300 will definitely be going up for auction.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 6 жыл бұрын
I think the zoom action is generally OK. That extra 100mm does give you an awful lot of extra reach. Not so long ago the idea that a lens with magnification of 16x was affordable by ordinary photogrphers would have seemed silly. Let alone a zoom!
@authunhx3129
@authunhx3129 5 жыл бұрын
"So here's some shots of a neighbours roof", classic. Did you study the radio life of Tony Hancock? Great stuff.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 5 жыл бұрын
Yes, I know Hancock's shows. Some of that has definitely rubbed off on me. Hancock and the writers, Galton and Simpson were a dream team. No-one can forget when he goes to give blood and is irked that all he gets by way of thanks is a cup of tea. He wanted a medal for giving a pint of blood - "I mean, that nearly an armful". Brilliant stuff. That droopy, hangdog face!
@OttoRascon
@OttoRascon 8 жыл бұрын
Another great review David. I love your stop motion shots at the beginning. Thanks!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks Otto! I like doing those little stop motion sequences. I'd like to do more animation, with other subjects than cameras,, actually but there's only so much time.
@kbruff2010
@kbruff2010 2 жыл бұрын
1/12/2022 thank you for sharing this information
@terrylovejoy3147
@terrylovejoy3147 3 жыл бұрын
Nice review David, I love the fact it's so light (relative to anything else with that much reach).
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Terry. Yes, it's a big bonus in a lens that's likely to tucked into rucksacks while hiking out looking for wildlife.
@MatthewJTalas
@MatthewJTalas 8 жыл бұрын
I was very excited to hear about this lens when it was announced. I just picked up a pristine used Panasonic 100-300 for what I think was a bargain thanks to this lens now being in the lineup. BTW -- I bought the 100-300 based on your review and so far I am quite pleased. I know that this Leica badged model will have better specs, and it has more reach, but honestly the 100-300 I just acquired seems to do all I need and more for a fraction of the price. I grabbed some great pictures of my nephew on the field playing (American) football while I was seated up in the stands with my G6 attached directly to a monopod (haven't invested in the collar yet -- not sure I will). I allowed the ISO to go pretty high which let me stop the action down on the field and created some super photos to share with the family on Facebook where a bit of noise isn't even noticed. I also took it out for some shots of birds near the water in the bright sunlight, on top of a somewhat smallish tripod, and again it did very well. I still need to spend some time with it and learn how to finesse better results out of it, but I think it was a great purchase and I owe it all to the Leica 100-400 and its impressive specs.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
A hidden advantage of new lenses is the drop in price of the older model - and yet anyone who is/ was happy with the older model, well it hasn't changed. The 100-300 remains a capable lens and you hit on an important point. The advantage of newer lenses, if they perform better, is only at higher magnifications. For Facebook and much normal use, prints 12x10, screens at around 2000px, the difference isn't apparent. On the noise at high ISO, for floodlit sports and some gig shots, I like to _add_ a bit noise to FB material - it gives atmosphere! .
@Dolmen254
@Dolmen254 7 жыл бұрын
Great review, David. I bought this as soon as it hit the stores, found the zoom ring unworkable, tried a second copy with the same results.Will have to try again!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
Hmmm...Panasonic need to sort that out. The lens is still usable but operation can be obstructive unpleasant with the stiff zoom ring. Not what you want if you've forked out more than 1,000 for it.
@LittleLightCZ
@LittleLightCZ 4 жыл бұрын
It's almost like a listening to an audio book, but boy I love it :-). Nicely shown and compared.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 4 жыл бұрын
I script all my videos which is probably why they sound like a book. I hate waffling and ers and ums in videos. Glad you liked it and thanks for telling me!
@New777World
@New777World 4 жыл бұрын
Love your reviews! There are story telling that keeps wanting to hear more! 👍
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 4 жыл бұрын
Glad you like them! Thanks, Isaac.
@sesskie
@sesskie 8 жыл бұрын
You are a gift to the M43 community and a bane to recovering GAS addicts David! Lovely review and lovely piece of glass but I agree its probably the best lens I'd never buy, as it is, my bargain bin 45-150 sits at home on the shelf! Will you be attending Photokina next week? Looking forward to see what the E1Mk2 brings... Hoping they went with the new 16mp global shutter sensor and not the bog standard 20MP one. Keep up the great work David, always a treat to watch your reviews. :)
@martinjames9535
@martinjames9535 8 жыл бұрын
Brilliant review, always enjoy them David, another lens to dream about.Many thanks.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks Martin - yes a dream lens! Lovely that such glass is available even of few of us would have great need of it.
@5nanometers
@5nanometers 8 жыл бұрын
I'm never going to buy this lens, but I love your reviews so much that I watched the video anyways!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
What can I say but thanks - very pleasing to me to hear that.
@fansofER
@fansofER 2 жыл бұрын
miss you, David.
@williampegram
@williampegram 6 жыл бұрын
Mr Thorpe, I always enjoy your reviews but I must say that the presentation of the 250 mph diving falcon prior to the snaps of ones neighbour's roof intead, was nothing short of genious (David, you had me laughing out loud after a very tiring & stressful day, hence not a small feat!) PS I'm saving up for sticking the 40-150 2.8 onto my E-M1 II. Yep saw your review of it too (now I come to think of it saw your review of the MC1.4 that I also want:) Thank you Sir as always for the very good information.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 6 жыл бұрын
It's my pleasure, William and thank you. The lens and TC are worth buying together - it's usually cheaper than buying them at separate times.
@Schwingi
@Schwingi 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks mate, spot on as usual! You are the king of MFT reviews on KZfaq. 👍
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
What can I say except...thanks!
@UlfJondelius
@UlfJondelius 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks for an excellent review! I bought this lenses when it was released and used it a lot for bird photography and large insects like dragonflies and butterflies. It is wonderful. Makes me happy every time I take it out. And it is very reasonably priced compared to DSLR lenses.
@robbyboyo
@robbyboyo 8 жыл бұрын
Nice review. Wonderful lens. Thanks.
@lindamcmullin785
@lindamcmullin785 8 жыл бұрын
Ulf, what camera body do you like with this lens? Just curious as I may purchase another body soon. I currently use the G7. Thx!
@UlfJondelius
@UlfJondelius 8 жыл бұрын
Actually I use it with an OM-D EM 5 mkII so I am restricted to the lens O.I.S., but I an still get sharp shots at 1/100 400 mm. I use a battery grip with the camera, which helps balance the lens. The one weak point of the EM5 mk II is that focusing on birds in flight is not always successful, but the focus limiter on the lens helps a bit with that.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks Ulf! Yes, the price is fair enough for what it is. And you have perfect uses for it, too.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Yes, lovely lens.
@Serenoj69
@Serenoj69 7 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't call the 40-150 Oly a lens that epithomises the system. If there is one lens,. to my mind, doing that on mFTs it is the 35-100 F2.8. It weighs 360 grams. It gets you 70-200 mm euiv FL. The Oly gets you 80-300. But it weighs 765 gram without the collar...also the 35-100 is every bit as good and to me it makes better sense with my 100-400 Panny, which is a lens I like too. 12-35 f2.8 is also great but gave a lot of purple and green neon flaring on my GH4. On my Em1.2 this has diminished greatly. Lovely review again David, classy, calm, informative and good in depth as always. Keep up the good work!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
I'm with you in one sense in that the Panasonic 35-100mm f/2.8 better follows the Micro Four Thirds ability to be compact and have great IQ but I meant more in the sense that a 40-150 f/2.8 lens can be built at all and so exploits and extends the possibilities of Micro Four Thirds. The 40-150 and converter make more sense for me because I have so little use for a lens as long as the 100-400 Panasonic in what I do. If I did, the 35-100 would definitely make more sense. As it is, for my use the 40-150 f/2.8 replaces 2 lenses, a 35-100 f/2.8 and 200mm f/4 (if there was one). Glad you like the videos - I'll try to keep 'em comin' !
@applejack120
@applejack120 4 жыл бұрын
So here are some shots of the neighbours roof, nice touch, can't wait till you get to Andes Mountains LOL. Great video good info thank you.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks - much appreciated.
@Hashbrown37
@Hashbrown37 8 жыл бұрын
Good review as always, David. Although I am sure we would all love to have seen the aerial combat pictures you ... helped us to imagine.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
So you have seen through my cunning ploy :-) Glad you liked the reeiew!
@Kenjis9965
@Kenjis9965 7 жыл бұрын
The thing you mentioned about dialing it back to 100 to find your subject is why personally i like zooms at these really long focal lengths. The closest equivalents to this (in my brain) would be the Sigma 150-600 f/5-6.3 Contemporary on an APS-C DSLR like the 7D Mark II or D500, The Sigma is half the price (about) in the US but twice the weight... Of course you could also mount the Sigma onto a Sony a6300...I bought the Sigma for the record since I run both m4/3 and a Canon DSLR system at the moment I sometimes regret not getting the Leica 100-400, but when i made the purchase it wasn't shipping and there were no reviews :( I also.. as good as the DFD is.. I still dont trust it the way i just trust my dslr yet. Then again, this lens is a lot less intimidating for outsiders compared to the 150-600!
@Bratman530
@Bratman530 2 жыл бұрын
i totally enjoyed this review...3 or 4 months ago,, i bought the smaller brother..50 - 200mm leica to go with my G9.. i love the results,, and the craftsmeship,, in that lens.. that lens is on my G9 probably 90 % of the time.. sighhhhh...lol
@keithk888
@keithk888 7 жыл бұрын
Great review, made me laugh out loud at the neighbor's roof comment. I took this lens on a safari to kenya last summer when I made the switch to m43 to save weight during travel and I didn't regret it. I was disappointed with the stiff zoom and should have stopped videos in between zooming but live and learn. I used a lot of your reviews last year when choosing what to buy along with the GX8 Kindle guide. They were very helpful, thanks! I'm deciding on my first prime lens at the moment for an upcoming trip to Costa Rica, will be (re)watching any of your videos I can find on those next. Currently using 7-14, 12-32 (great for keeping it small and simple around town), 14-140 and 100-400.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked the review. That's a pretty comprehensive range of lens you have there and ideal for travel. It's difficult to know what prime would be best. The 17mm f/1.8 Olympus is one of my favourites, or the 45mm f1/8. Depends what you want to do, I guess.
@keithk888
@keithk888 7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the suggestion and quick reply. I agree, tough to recommend a lens without knowing shooting preferences. I do prefer having the ability to shoot in close quarters so I was looking at 25mm and under (20mm, 17, 15). The 17mm olympus sounds like a good match, I wil look into that more. Thanks again.
@grabshotphoto7396
@grabshotphoto7396 3 жыл бұрын
11:14 For me, it's faraway mountain peaks draped in clouds/mist/snow/etc. Or tree lined ridges and the like.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 3 жыл бұрын
I like tele lenses for landscapes. It gives a truer sense of perspective, especially for mountains.
@RodrigoVzq
@RodrigoVzq 8 жыл бұрын
Good old roof shots. Very enjoyable video david
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks Rodrigo!
@telkirton
@telkirton 6 жыл бұрын
Excellent review David, Thanks.
@davidthorpe7732
@davidthorpe7732 6 жыл бұрын
Glad you like it, Tel, thanks.
@DavidFredericks
@DavidFredericks 8 жыл бұрын
Another great review, thanks. I have this lens and mine has a stiff zoom ring, though yours looks a little stiffer. Finding moving birds in the sky at 400mm is almost impossible. Did get some close shots of the Goodyear blimp as it passed over my house a few days ago.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks, David! Yes, with 16x mag, finding a fast moving subject is next to impossible and just as hard to keep in frame when you've found it. The blimp, no I didn't get a shot of it. Too much heat haze over the Mohave between me in London and you in California. It didn't look 100% sharp so i deleted it. :-)
@philemotion8876
@philemotion8876 8 жыл бұрын
I loved your review David ! Thanks !
@Dustinrhoades
@Dustinrhoades 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks, David. I've been anticipating your review of this lens for awhile now. While I covet it, I probably don't shoot enough "aerial falcon drama over Machu Picchu" to merit it at this point. ;-) When it comes out, I'd love to get your take on the new Olympus 30mm macro. Considering how often I used the 60mm 2.8, I'm relatively certain I'd get my money's worth out of that lens too. Again, thank you so much for your thoughtful reviews. In my opinion, you produce the most thoughtful "real-world" photography gear reviews on KZfaq. Dustin
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot, Dustin, I appreciate your remarks and especially the aerial falcon drama ;-) I'm interested that Olympus might out a 30mm macro. It's too short for most macro as I found withy the Panasonic one but has the advantage that it would double as a standard lens. If it is f/3.5 as rumoured it would potentially be cheaper and likely have extra sharp and flat field performance due to the limited maxim,um aperture.
@user-hs1zz9sx2e
@user-hs1zz9sx2e 4 жыл бұрын
Love your voice over, pleasant to ears !
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 4 жыл бұрын
Nice to hear that, thanks!
@jackymo820
@jackymo820 2 жыл бұрын
love your words (speech)
@lightforall2398
@lightforall2398 7 жыл бұрын
Wow, I am quite impressed with this glass. I am looking to switch from Nikon FX sensor (D4S) to the GH5 system. The 600mm f/4 is such a beast but by the time you switch to this and even the GH5 with battery pack, it's so much less cumbersome, while being able to shoot at 800mm equivalent. Thanks for this review.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
The relative compactness of Micro Four Thirds is one of its great attractions, Glad the review was helpful!
@jeffdrew625
@jeffdrew625 6 жыл бұрын
I like the review - added lens to Santa's delivery list! A cry "Fowl!" however! Next time I want to see the gannets with struggling fish! LOL!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 6 жыл бұрын
😁
@vincentoliver
@vincentoliver 7 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed the photos of the neighbours roof, who wants to see Kingfisher - Gannets diving for fish anyway or even Sparrowhawks hunting for food. Give me a rooftop anyday.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
You are an artist after my own heart, sir. As Oscar Wilde said, "when a man is tired of his neighbour's roof, he is tired of life." Something like that, any way :-)
@castielvargastv7931
@castielvargastv7931 4 жыл бұрын
I would love to have such an incredible lense
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 4 жыл бұрын
Very specialist but a lot of fun to use. The sort of lens you find uses for!
@charlesfurer
@charlesfurer 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your excellent review, practicality, and celebration of space in your dialogue; I could listen to you read the phone book. By all means, please DO show off the whirling birds sequence. C'mon!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
+Charles Furer thanks Charles, very flattering! I am unwilling to share the bird sequences because I do not wish to make other photographers feel inferior. Perfection is not given to many but for those of us (well, me) who have it, showing off is unseemly :-)
@alvinburrell
@alvinburrell 8 жыл бұрын
Always enjoy your reviews...
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Good to hear that Alvin and thanks for telling me!
@juana1483
@juana1483 Жыл бұрын
My next lens. Once I sell off unused other lenses!!
@michaelhawkins1173
@michaelhawkins1173 3 жыл бұрын
A beautiful review.
@DynamixWarePro
@DynamixWarePro 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the review. If ever I had the money, I'd get this for sure, since I am into wildlife photography but find the quality at 300mm on the 100-300mm isn't very sharp. I have seen that Sigma "Sigmonster" lens before, its huge but without stabilisation its hard to use, even with a tripod. I know many people don't like crops, but this is where M4/3 as you said is great, you don;t have to use such large lenses to get the same focal lengths you would on a full frame or ASP-C camera. BTW, I'd love to see those show offy shots, they sound very interesting!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
If only the show offy shots existed! Just my way of getting around the fact that bird photography is absurdly difficult and trying to joke my way out of it! The 100-300mm, yes, the weakest point is at the 300mm end. I get good results with an old 300mm Nikkor and adapter but even though manual focusing is quite easy with it, I wouldn't care to go birding with it. The good news is, I paid just £145 for the lens and £20 for the adapter.
@movimox
@movimox 7 жыл бұрын
Narative....Best in class, thank you :)
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Thomas!
@Mrcherrardcohen
@Mrcherrardcohen 7 жыл бұрын
Another great Video. Can't wait to pair it with the GH5.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
Yes, it will be very interesting to have both lens and camera body at the cutting edge of Panasonic's capabilities.
@rodeliopajo6302
@rodeliopajo6302 7 жыл бұрын
this is a very nice lense for sports ang wild life photography.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
It certainly is, Rodelio.
@frazerweb
@frazerweb 10 ай бұрын
Shame David couldn't be reviewing the new mk2 version, instead of the I have crowd.
@soundknight
@soundknight 8 жыл бұрын
wow great feature set.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Yes, they thought of everything. One thing I'd have liked would be Function button as with Olympus. Makes back button focusing, (as it's known), much easier.
@grantmedical
@grantmedical 4 жыл бұрын
Good Morning David... Have you had a chance to review the "new" Panasonic-Leica 50-200mm f/2.8-4 Lens yet? I would be curious to hear what you have to say... I know you have the 35-100mm f/2.8 and the Panasonic-Leica 100-300mm in your kit - BUT imagine this!!! Getting the 50-200mm lens AND a 2x teleconverter?!!! WOW!!! I would love to hear your opinion... As always I love your honest and thorough reviews very much... Keep up the excellent work!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Mattheiu and good morning - I haven't tried the 2x converter but I have reviewed the 50-200 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d5aAhbR7vtCUdI0.html. The 2x would be nice in terms of magnification on it but the loss of two stops means you have a 400mm f/8 at the long end which is a bit on the slow side for many of the situations where you might need a powerful telephoto. There's an inevitable loss of sharpness, too. A handy tool to have, nevertheless.
@DanOhPhotography
@DanOhPhotography 7 жыл бұрын
Dear David Thorpe - have you heard anyone use olympus om-d e-m5 mark ii with Lumix 100-400mm lens? I know dual IS would not work, but I wonder if there is any issue focusing or in- body IS (while turning off lens IS). Oly OM1 Markii sound bit too good to pass ... I am hoping Panasonic would make 20mp, 5 axis, weather sealed, 6k photo, higher than 10 fps ... camera that would be head to head with Olympus OM1 markii
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
Hi Dan - I would think that the Panasonic GH5 scheduled for next year would compete with the E-M1ll. Re the lens, no, there's no problem with using it with the E-M511 and it will work on it just as it would with a Panasonic body. It'll function just great with either the camera or lens stabilization. It'd be worth experimenting to see which you thinks works the best but my guess is that there wouldn't be much in it.
@Pabula
@Pabula 6 жыл бұрын
Well now there is the G9 that rivals the OM1.2
@Stalled-wm3qd
@Stalled-wm3qd 5 жыл бұрын
@@Pabula And an upgrade to the autofocus with firmware 1.2 for the G9 in October 2018 is yet another improvement. I have this lens and the G9. With the G9 it is also worth noting there are 4 options (SET 1-4) for customising AF to suit the circumstances you are photographing stills. This is only available in AFC mode and in the Camera settings on Page 1 of the Menu (AF Custom Settings(Photo)).
@xenonozhid3383
@xenonozhid3383 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the great review David. Now I'm considering flipping a coin with this lens of the Oly 40-150 + tele converter! I do like the brightness & feel of the f2.8 Olympus product, but the sheer reach of this Panasonic is also very attractive. Cheers.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Decisions decisions! As I said in the video, the Olympus's range from 40 to 210 with the converter is much more usable generally than the more extreme 100-400. Portraiture even at 100mm is putting you too far away from your subject. The answer is simple, just buy them both :-)
@xenonozhid3383
@xenonozhid3383 8 жыл бұрын
Indeed, that would be nice! I'll buy the Olympus and a mate is buying the Panasonic, so we have both covered. Again, great review thank you.
@xenonozhid3383
@xenonozhid3383 7 жыл бұрын
Well David, I've just taken delivery of the Oly lens - and I must say it's the first time I've had images from a digital camera that I can say is not bad compared to film. Just wanted to say thank you for your boundless enthusiasm and influence with your reviews & recommendations. . Cheers, Frank.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 7 жыл бұрын
Yes, a truly wonderful lens. I use mine at f/2.8 a lot of the time without a qualm. I've just been using it for portraits and knocked out with the ease of use and quality.
@jaffarbh
@jaffarbh 8 жыл бұрын
By the way, Panasonic has just announced the GH5. Will be available mid next year. Main highlight is 4K video at 60p and 4:2:2 recording internally but apparently no sensor stabilization (I hope I am wrong)
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
I hope you are wrong, too. If the flagship model doesn't have stabilization it would be a serious omission. Certainly it would make it unattractive to me.
@chrisaddy4604
@chrisaddy4604 8 жыл бұрын
It also announced 3 new zoom lens, one of which was 8mm - 18mm 2.8-4 an 8mm will be interesting to see on gh5/4, and yes I know their is an Olympus 9mm f8, but f8 is too dark for high Shutter speeds
@sundarAKintelart
@sundarAKintelart 4 жыл бұрын
Neat presentation
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks you, Sundar.
@chrisperry3430
@chrisperry3430 8 жыл бұрын
Another very good informative review David, I bought this lens a few weeks back and have found the zoom ring stiffness eases with use, my thoughts are that the zoom lock fails to release fully, living in Scotland though, I fancy my chances of catching eagles, kingfishers, or indeed superman, much greater than catching a heat haze.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks Chris! Interesting observation about the zoom lock ring, hadn't thought of that. I have a horrible feeling that even if I were in Scotland I'd _still_ have a better chance a catching a heat haze than those uncooperative birds you mention. Even apart from birds, this lens would give some wonderful perspective effects on land and sea scapes.
@peace4myheart
@peace4myheart 8 жыл бұрын
You are right. These are for specific to people capturing wildlife and for voyeurism. =P In all seriousness, I think for most people, the 12-40mm f2.8 and 40-150mm f2.8 is all they will ever need as those two lens will fulfill 95% of their general needs. I have a couple of zoom lens and prime lens but I tend to use the 12-40mm the most with the occasional 45mm f1.8 for portraits. The rest are just sitting in my bag. I think I will sell them. Not sure if I even want to buy the 40-150mm. It's a great lens and I want it, but I don't know if I will use it as much to justify the investment.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
A lens that is worth having if you only occasionally want a tele is the little Panasonic 35-100. It takes up very little space, adds little weight and is an excellent performer for not a lot of money.
@peace4myheart
@peace4myheart 8 жыл бұрын
I was considering that but I'm just feel like I wasted money paying extra for OIS bc it doesn't work in conjunction with Olympus IBIS. Still you are right. The Panasonic 35-100mm is better suited for my needs.
@ericebrole8584
@ericebrole8584 8 жыл бұрын
Great review as usual. Thanks!
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks Eric!
@raygeary1698
@raygeary1698 8 жыл бұрын
Great review Dave nice bird ing lens
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks Ray! From the email I'm getting bird photography is very popular so this lens may sell more than I would have thought.
@trainz49
@trainz49 8 жыл бұрын
as always another great review, thanks
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@AprilClayton
@AprilClayton Жыл бұрын
I thought I was the only one who tested telephoto lenses on the neighbors roof.
@IljaSara
@IljaSara 8 жыл бұрын
Great review! I _do_ like to photograph birds. This would be my dream lens at the moment. Its price is just too steep. I've been using 45-200mm Pana and 500mm Samyang now.100-400mm would cover almost all my bird photography needs. But sometimes even the 500mm is too short for taking picture of a small bird that's far away. Although that happens very rarely. I wonder why didn't Olympus make 2x tele converter for their 40-150mm..? Although 300mm starts to be too short too often.
@DavidThorpeMFT
@DavidThorpeMFT 8 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked the review! Yes, the 100-00 would be perfect for your purposes. The price will come down, I guess but probably no that much. Olympus do make a 2x converter for the 4/3 lenses. It would fit but how it would work I don't know. Birds really are the hardest things to photograph - that's why i can only joke about it in the video!
Кадр сыртындағы қызықтар | Келінжан
00:16
WHO CAN RUN FASTER?
00:23
Zhong
Рет қаралды 35 МЛН
女孩妒忌小丑女? #小丑#shorts
00:34
好人小丑
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Can A Seed Grow In Your Nose? 🤔
00:33
Zack D. Films
Рет қаралды 32 МЛН
Panasonic Leica 100-400mm
11:12
Matti Sulanto
Рет қаралды 72 М.
A Look At The Metabones Speed Booster For Micro Four Thirds Cameras.
10:02
The TRUTH about shooting at ISO 100 that the PROS know.
11:41
Simon d'Entremont
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
In the field with Panasonic's new 100-400mm zoom
6:59
Daniel J. Cox–Natural Exposures TV
Рет қаралды 192 М.
9 Reasons to Buy Micro Four Thirds Cameras in 2024
18:51
Kai W
Рет қаралды 172 М.
Lenses that make Micro Four Thirds make sense
11:26
Micro Four Nerds
Рет қаралды 44 М.
Кадр сыртындағы қызықтар | Келінжан
00:16