Russia is the aggressor, tell them to stop the war and return stolen land. It's that easy.

украинцы это и есть русские, только они оболванены западной пропагандой, и другими некоммерческими структурами, действующими на украине с 1989 года

All world want peace besides the head of Ukraine! Even the head of Ukrainian Army want to end this war, but the former actor wants to continue. He is Pinachet our days.

nah not that powerful just good thrust to weight ratio.

@@propulsionmaster contradiction. Powerful relative to its weight is what makes it 'powerful' except in perhaps raw numbers of thrust.

@@cdgncgn Why contradiction? Only because a Rocket has good thrust to weight ratio it doesent mean its powerful. I am talking about raw power. For example if a model rocket with a good thrust to weight ratio has a 9 Newton Rocketmotor then the rocket is still not powerful.

Yes it seems the rocket is overpowered 😂

If that is the case why don't we see Russian rockets landing on drone ships?

@@jmatt98 because they suck lol

​@@jmatt98it is stupid to make that comment,, i don't see NASA doing that and only Elon try it but USA keep buying RUSSIAN rockets for NASA use

@@chechnya You suck a lot in real life, bot! :P

😂😂😂😂.. You're living in the past. Russia fails to modernize its Space industry..Far behind SpaceX in innovation.

Посмотрите про Росатом. Тоже интересно. Живу вблизи города, который единственный в мире (не уверен на 100% в этом) умеет перерабатывать гексофторид урана (ядерные отходы) в топливо для атомных станций. Про коммерческий реактор на быстрых нейронах (вроде тоже единственный в мире). Думаю вам понравится

​@@user-ho5dm3cb6jUF⁶ is not a nuclear Waste.

Проблема в том что все технологии приходится продвигать через Запад. Много вы слышали про продукцию других стран?

This isn't "russian civilian technology". In fact it's neither "civilian" (at this time, their only significant customer is the russian military) or "technology" (a dilapidated old factory producing 40 year old designs isn't "technology")

@@eduardodecastro4829 US can't even make engines as cheap and reliable as this "40 year-old" technology

true

The US did not play any game. Russia went from the people's Russia to a country controlled by the very rich few. it is no more MOTHER RUSSIA but a single individual's Russia.

If that is the case why don't we see Russian rockets landing on drone ships?

How did the US suppress Russia? You just couldn't keep up and compete. Now we have several companies blasting rockets into space.

@@chechnya Its simple and easy... Put sanctions...

Thank you.

God bless Ukraine and NATO ❤

Fuck the wicked Russian politics and propoganda

@@heromail2903only satan could bless nato and ukraine

❤❤❤❤

What is there to Mexican culture? Drugs, cartels and tacos?

Only reason an Asian may not be interested is because of circumstances. You happened to bump into a Russian who was interested in Mexican history Pretty sure there are Chinese who specialize in Latin America Since there are 1.5 billion of them the odds of you bumping into one interested in Mexico will be very low. Don't forget it was the Chinese that invented the rocket.

your statement is elegantly and accurately worded. in all facets, asians definitely assume superiority is their natural position. hahaha

PO Energomash is a major Russian rocket engine manufacturer. They base near Moscow. Its a part of this movie kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g9ueZ7yQ27bHZKc.html

This is stock footage you dummy. Russia wouldnt allow these buffoon in to their rocket engine facility. Get real!

матерь божья - родина мать, хранит нас

Concordo, pura verdade!

Only when necessary 😂

Россия делает без понтов, просто надёжно. Как ака 47.😊

You must be jokin' "....God (to) bless...." that political social economic moral swamp corrupted to the core?

@@danilo16410 I think you are confused with Poutine Soviet regime.

Os foguetes dos 🇺🇸 não estavam saindo do solo, sempre explodiram.

in mother russia they build rocket engines while smoking cigarettes......russia is no homeland for dutch sissy boys

At the Russia germanys factory machines of 2WW working now. Russians can repair any machines.

любое российское предприятие имеет проектно-инженерный отдел, который способен спроектировать и заменить любой технический узел, любого станка. даже системы с ЧПУ.

@@user-rl9xl2ej7n до сих пор россия сотрудничала с европейскими и японскими компаниями по гарантированному тех обслуживанию, только из-за европейского законодательства и патентного права. сегодня Россию эти обязательства больше не сдерживают.

@@user-fy3bd2lk9j Думаете они это понимают?

А собственно зачем вообще нужна Германия? Конечно пока кому-то нужны ее станки она существует.

En fazla 3-4 günlük iş.

Не научились делать такой как в СССР. То есть, представляете, что СССР, обогнала в двигателях всех, минимум на 50 лет. 😮Просто шок. И имея технологию, повторить, никто не может 🤷

Это чутьё. Мастерство. По -русски такой стиль в любом деле называеться ,,авось,,.

Said no one ever

@@chechnya I said it

Фантазер🤣

yea, but wait, biden said theyre out of ammo, so?

Is the Raptor-2 engine disposable? It just doesn't make any sense to produce such an engine once a day. This is nonsense. I think this is a pure fake and a PR hoax. Dust in the eyes. Wealthy people and companies often engage in such deception to attract attention, investments from hamsters and can pay for articles in serious magazines and write a page on Wikipedia.

В США выглядит как в 2020.Но повторить двигатель не можете уже много десятилетий.

yet they build better rocket engines than the USA, thats why USA buys engines from them, even with sanctions

Нет, у нас своя школа.

You start Monday. We need sweepers 🧹

Тоже, что и сейчас. Устроить поножовщину! Ах за ха ха ха ха

Nunca ia dar.certo, pois a🇷🇺 é humilde 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🇷🇺👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍. 🇺🇸 é egoísta 🤮🇺🇸🤮🇺🇸🤮🇺🇸🤮🇺🇸🤮🇺🇸👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻

But American people fly space by this old engines.

MAY BE FROM THE 80'S BUT VERY EFFECTIVE TO BUILD THOSE ROCKET'S ENGINE'S !!!

Мозги у тебя устаревшие

американцы до сих пор не создали ничего подобного

Вам с дивана виднее, хотя НАСА вроде думает обратное

И все они уступают Росийскому🤷

Putin just destroys Russia. With a more intelligent leader, your economy and prosperity would have been far greater.

European and American segments are 50 years behind Russian segments. Russian space industry was always years ahead in everything. European and American segments are built on Russian documentation for MIR-2 space station. Russian segments are first ISS segments. Russian segments are core segments with mission critical equipment. All engines and all fuel are on Russian segments, all orbital corrections are made by Russian segment. European and American segments are just dumb barrels. Russian segments can exist in space completely independent, European and American segments would just fall on Earth. Europeans and Americans just can't travel to ISS for 10 years until Musk saved them from Space Shuttle miserable disaster, only Russians have sustained continuous manned space program for more than 60 years

White European are so mad with Russia that they move to united states to say "I'm American 😂😂😂😂 ,,

hhahaha, 😂😂😂😂😂

@@bagamut No one is 50 years ahead🤣🤣. Yeah there was a time where russia was clearly ahead of the U.S but today i would say its pretty even. Today I think the U.S is slightly ahead only because of musk and the reusabilty of his falcon 9 and in future maybe starship. Just look at the new Raptor v3 with 350bar chamber pressure nothing comes close to this rd170 got 245 for example. Yeah i know raptor didnt make it to orbit but im optimistic it will happen in the future.

@@propulsionmaster new Raptor v3 with 350bar (not confirmed 350bar) is extremely unreliable, exploded one by one, and still is compared to 40 years old rd170, haha While rd180 and rd191 can achieve up to 300bar in reality. What is even in US now? Can US build new space station without Space Shuttle? No. Russia can start building new space station any time just by launching new modules.

There were no American astronauts on the Moon, and the Earth is flat))))

You need to take more Crystal Meth!@@denslipped

Thats a lot of observation brat ! Maybe true .

Петр Левочкин спасает предприятие

НПО Энергомаш

Propaganda. The 14D23 engine has been developed in Russia and has been used for many years in its various modifications on all major launch vehicles. The engine uses naphthyl as fuel and has the highest specific impulse in the world. In addition, the RD-0162 D 2 engine has been developed and tested - a prototype of the RD-0162 engine with a thrust of 200 tc, and a new RD-0177 prototype of the RD-0169 engine with a thrust of 100ts on liquefied natural gas is being created.

Where are these engines, where are these prototypes? Where are these rockets? It takes Russia 20 years to create one new rocket completely corrupted by oligarchs.

@@aggregat The answer to your "where". The 14D23 rocket engine in the RD-0124 variant is installed on the third stage of the Soyuz-2 launch vehicle (modifications 1b,1v,STB). The previous launch took place on December 27, 2023, and the upcoming launch on February 29, 2024. This is the world's best medium-class rocket "at the cost of payload per kilogram of mass", for launching into sun-synchronous orbits. Preparations are underway at the Vostochny cosmodrome for the launch of a meteorological spacecraft and a series of small spacecraft with associated payloads. RD-0124A is installed in the second and third stages of the Angara missile system. The previous launch took place on October 15, 2022. The fifth (under test) heavy launch vehicle Angara-A5 is currently preparing for launch in April this year from the Vostochny cosmodrome as part of the tests of the Orion upper stage. The rocket, in the Angara-A5M modification, is being replaced by the Proton-M heavy launch vehicle, the production of which has already been discontinued. The RD-171MV rocket engine for the first stage of the Soyuz-5 medium launch vehicle is now in mass production in a batch of engines for flight design tests, as is the RD-0124MS for the second stage of this launch vehicle. The tanks of the first stage are currently undergoing annual vibrodynamic tests at TsNIIMash. The Soyuz-5 launch vehicle is replacing the Zenit launch vehicle from the Baikonur cosmodrome and will also be launched from the universal complex at the Vostochny cosmodrome in the second half of this decade. The RD-0162 D 2 methane rocket engine (Demonstrator 2) is a prototype of the RD-0162 engine (for future interorbital tugs) as part of the RD-182 rocket engine development program (250ts thrust) for a prospective superheavy rocket. The RD-0177 methane rocket engine (demonstrator) is currently in production (tests are scheduled for the summer of 2024 at KBHA), as a result, the RD-0169 engine will be created for the Amur-SPG medium launch vehicle with a reusable first stage, which is being replaced at the Progress RCC (Samara) today "Soyuz-2" at the end of this decade. I hope I answered your questions in as much detail as possible. Don't read Western propaganda.)))

NPS

😂😂

Но не будите там работать

Russian engines are the best on the planet, SpaseX copied the technology of Soviet engines created 40 years ago. And the USA never landed on the moon, the USA still does not have the engine like the Russians for this.

yes, yes ... In Russia, everything is outdated and rusty junk, but in the USA everything is beautiful and new ... But when Russian is compared with American in terms of characteristics, it is American beautiful candy wrappers that always turns out to be junk in comparison ...

Hey guy! Tell me why do Americans fly to the International Space Station on Russian ships? Therefore, the United States imposed 1000 sanctions against the Russian Federation, literally everything that is possible except for the purchase of Russian rocket engines, even Elon Musk buys them. He tried to repeat the Russian technology of the 60s, but he did not succeed well. I can tell you that the spacecraft return system has been worked out in the USSR for 60 years and there is no point in it since you are returning an empty barrel to earth, but in order to return it you need to refuel twice as much fuel, because it is overweight there and fuel on the way back and this is a vicious system, the more fuel you take, the more fuel you need to take. Just to return a piece of pipe to the ground. I can say that if an American is pissed on his head and if he does not want to admit it, then he will say that this is holy water.

​@@user-sp8ew8yk9kкрасавчик... 😊

Только эти "многоразовые" системы приходят в негодность через 2-3 запуска. А потом либо в мусор, либо дорогая пересборка. Да и транспортировка назад денег стоит.