So kind of you, thank you.

Thank you, Sophie.

Thank you for your kind words, Kathleen.

You would imagine that one could smell the blood still. I guess if you're drunk enough though. zzzzzzz.

And from London too, Jakey.

Very kind of you, Brenda.

It would have been an intriguing walk, Phil.

Thank you so much, very kind of you to say so.

I agree with you that he was from the area..As well as blending in and perhaps being charismatic,he knew the habits and best areas the women walked and what times those areas were the quietest..Like Jack had confidence to allow such time as to carry out he’s selected mutilations..It’s Jack’s timing that is one point of this case that adds more chill to a chilling crime..Also adds to the idea he was local..Knew the area not just well but it’s changing activity at all times..All the best.!🎩👍

Yes, America's most famous SK, Ted Bundy totally blended in, hid it all very well, and even appeared to be a future success story in Law. But there were signs. Subtle, but there. Otoh, Jeff Dahmer was very symptomatic of psychopathy since high school. John Gacy was considered a respected businessman and good neighbor. We will never know who JTR was. :( However, all 3 killers had signs pointing to something amiss.

Thank you, very kind of you, and what an honour to be compared to Martin.

My pleasure!

My pleasure, Mark.

That is very kind of you, thank you.

Thank you so much, Lawrence, very kind of you.

Thank you, Victor, very kind of you.

Hi, some of it is still there. I have a video of the site that I filmed in August on the channel.

Wow, thank you!

Thank you.

Richard the best Ripper expert on KZfaq.

Very kind of you, Mathew.

@@JackTheRipperToursYour very welcome

Thank you, Karen, very kind of you.

Glad you enjoyed it, Padraic.

Thank you, Chris. Pleased to have answered some questions.

Glad you enjoyed it!

Very welcome

Thank you! Cheers!

Glad you enjoyed it!

Many thanks!

Very welcome

I appreciate that

Thanks, Jamie.

Glad you enjoy it!

Very kind of you, Tim.

Thank you, Ryan.

Thanks, Hector.

I bought "the London that nobody knows" on dvd just to see it.

Thank you, John, very kind of you.

Thank you, that is kind of you to say so.

Thank you, Nigel.

Pleased you enjoyed it, and thank you for your comment.

Thanks.

Exactly! To me the idea would’ve been horrifying! They were clearly a lot braver back then.

I couldn't do it.

Anything is possible.

Thanks. Yes, the fact that they are connected shouldn't be so readily dismissed in the way that it often is.

Both murderers indeed. But there was two totally different methods used in these two cases. Also, one was said to have very little to no anatomical knowledge, and the other was said to have anatomical knowledge. One was dumped and hidden from people, while the other was more presented for all to see as if the killer was proud of his work. London during this time was the biggest metropolitan city in the world. Though the East end (Whitechapel District) didn’t exactly have as much successful people at the time. With this in mind, we know through history that it is possible to have two different serial killers who are killing at the same time in the same city, especially if that city is a metropolitan city. I can give many examples of this throughout history. It is possible, but not likely in my opinion.

Totally different methods of murder, no way was they the same man that done both crimes.

never heard of this Thames guy. Gonna look him up

@@daddyknowsbest2341 perhaps the torso ones were victims that he had killed in his own home or say his mothers home while she was away or whoever he lived with and had to get rid of the bodies. So he did it bit by bit, however the Jack the Ripper victims were ones he killed there & then so he could just leave them. I think with the JTR murders he acted impulsively & didn't set out to neccessarily kill that particular night but it was a combination of the particular "mood" he was in. Probably a mixture of anger at something & feeling horny. Then the opportunity came to him as in he was likely approached & asked if he wanted to "do business" and he decided to take advantage of the chance & release some of those pent up frustrations. On another night he likely just said no and walked on probably disgusted. That is why the women never seemed to be suspicious or concerned about him as they approached him. They were probably all conditioned to think Jack the ripper would approach them! And he would be some horrible looking monster almost. So they felt safe thinking if he was going to harm me he would be coming right up to me not about to pass on by. The only thing that makes me doubt my theory is the fact he had a knife on him. That suggests premeditation but maybe there were certain professions where the person would have their own knife or set if knives. I'm not sure how butchers or slaughterers took care of their tools. Did they take them home with them or leave them at the place of work? Did they share or have their own private knives? Or a barber surgeon perhaps, i'm sure some of them would have went to peoples houses to carry out minor surgery on people who couldn't get put of bed etc to go to him. Or an illegal abortionist. There could he several reasons why he so happened to have a knife on him. Or it could just be as simple as with it being such a rough area he may have always carried a knife on him for his own protection. I supose though either consciously or unconsciously he knew tonight may be the night....

The luftwaffe did try during WW2..

The Brits have a bad habit of tearing the old stuff down, but they rely enormously on tourism. Trust me, the tourists aren't going there to see those modern glass buildings. People put down Prince Charles and ridicule him but twenty years ago he was imploring his country to curtail the destruction. I guess they aren't getting it.

@@themajesticmagnificent8561 The English government's have created far more damage to the country of England than the Luftwaffe ever did , and still it continues day by day.

The vandalism has been going on for hundreds of years, they tore down the remaining pubs Shakespeare wrote in in London during the Victorian era, there's early photos of them. The area where the shenanigans of Robin Hood would have happened just outside Nottingham Castle were gutted outside of 3/4 buildings in the 60s. Never occurred to them a city that has one tourist draw might need to preserve the area where it happened. I'm sure there's lots of other examples too.

By the time of the Ripper murders, many of the older buildings in the East End were in dilapidated condition and past rescuing. Now this part is debatable: it is said that the Ripper drew such attention to these conditions that advancements were made. Older buildings, like those on Thrawl and Flower and Dean streets were demolished and replaced. The Rothschild buildings are a good example.

Glad you enjoyed it. Old Castle Street was more or less Castle Alley. The murder site was where the Wash Houses facade is. Hope this helps.

@@JackTheRipperTours Thank you 👍

Shows your sleep anywhere if you have nowhere..Still terrible and typical landlord..Though today Kirsty Alsop would advertise it as an interior historic feature and charge more rent for having it..!. But I wonder when those bloodstains were finally decorated over.?Probably after they were added with some more….🎩👍

Thank you.