A Portal Special Presentation- Geometric Unity: A First Look
Пікірлер: 4 700
@Cldfusion14 жыл бұрын
Now I understand how my cat feels when I talk to it.
@dawnsix4 жыл бұрын
lol good call
@kevinherd34374 жыл бұрын
Best comment of the week
@taz0k24 жыл бұрын
Assuming IQ maps linearly to number of brain cells in in the neocortex the IQ of E. Weinstein is 16 billions (human) divided by 0.25 billions (cat) multiplied with your IQ (est. 140) which equals 8,960
@fe83664 жыл бұрын
until now, I thought that you were referring to the camera angle at the beginning of the video...
@tonyduncan98524 жыл бұрын
And I'm in most earnest agreement.
@alecjorns53884 жыл бұрын
Eric, I am a nano engineering student at UCSD and recently proposed a novel geometric lattice structure composed of orthogonal struts, oriented in a Chiral manner. Using this lattice I was able to reconfigure the Fano plane used to describe the algebraic structure of Octonions. This new Fano plane is composed of two chiral components that can act independently. I would love to share these ideas with you as I have struggled to find someone able to comprehend its importance. To the KZfaq Community, I would sincerely appreciate all replies or favorites to this comment in order to hopefully bring this to the attention of Mr. Weinstein. Thank You -Alec
@alecjorns53884 жыл бұрын
@@ta-software-solutions I have not, do you know where I would find his contact information?
@stickybiscuits79464 жыл бұрын
this sounds interesting is there any way you can help me find out more?
@Felicidade1014 жыл бұрын
Is this real or a joke
@Vmh17174 жыл бұрын
Good luck
@nathaneyring48584 жыл бұрын
I really do want a good experimentalist to do something here. I don't get much of it, and get his theory would have lots that can't be tested, but just as a rule of thumb I have very little opinion on theory until it predicts something correctly.
@jeretooley5123 жыл бұрын
No real idea what's going on here, but it makes my KZfaq history look better.
@mankind88073 жыл бұрын
Lol
@Machiones3 жыл бұрын
Meaningwave Exists!
@snackentity57093 жыл бұрын
@Bored Scientist which part is bullshits
@excelsior9992 жыл бұрын
@Bored Scientist I think you mean "bullshit," (singular).
@manbearpiggins2 жыл бұрын
no, it doesn't
@mariocondello22823 жыл бұрын
I was watching Bangbros and some how ended up here, it's amazing where life can take you !
@mchapman24243 жыл бұрын
Lol me too. Its that post nut clarity
@chrisc72653 жыл бұрын
I got stuck in a washing machine and decided now was the right time to watch this
@jordanzdebski51323 жыл бұрын
where it got you? being stuck on yt?
@brandanvaquerano58093 жыл бұрын
😂
@Rastamanas3 жыл бұрын
what the fuck.
@strictlybusiness83664 жыл бұрын
I cannot believe I sat here and listened to this man speak for 3 HOURS while having absolutely ZERO clue what he is talking about 😂😂😂
@hamzaabuhamra14 жыл бұрын
Strictly Business HAHAHA
@justhamburgers61544 жыл бұрын
Hey mate, at least you gave it a shot. I'm sure you subconsciously absorbed more than you think. My brain is always sore after listening to him.
@thedrumunkey85824 жыл бұрын
Drugs or no drugs?
@skycae4 жыл бұрын
Same man but like im here
@rccola5614 жыл бұрын
Thanks for speaking on our behalf!!! Hahaha
@lionardo4 жыл бұрын
ok, let me explain how I go about this with one word that I don't understand: eric: bla bla bla... gauge theorie... me: googles gauge theorie wiki: In physics, a gauge theory is a type of field theory in which the Lagrangian does not change (is invariant) under local transformations from certain Lie groups. me: googles Lagrangian wiki: Lagrangian field theory is a formalism in classical field theory. me : googles formalism and classical field theory wiki: A classical field theory is a physical theory that predicts how one or more physical fields interact with matter through field equations me: googles Lie groups wiki: In mathematics, a Lie group (pronounced /liː/ "Lee") is a group whose elements are organized continuously and smoothly, as opposed to discrete groups, where the elements are separated-this makes Lie groups differentiable manifolds. me: "manifolds", yeah I heard that before... googles differentiable manifolds wiki: In mathematics, a differentiable manifold (also differential manifold) is a type of manifold that is locally similar enough to a linear space to allow one to do calculus... me: googles "where can I buy LSD?"
@renlo774 жыл бұрын
thank you Sir :D
@mattphillips25304 жыл бұрын
You went off course: Lagrangian. : a function that describes the state of a dynamic system in terms of position coordinates and their time derivatives and that is equal to the difference between the potential energy and kinetic energy - compare hamiltonian. So... The gauge theories are those which retain all the dynamical information about a system (think game physics plus all the objects in a Halo level) upto isomorphism. ISOMORPHISM - An information preserving transformation (think tilting a page of text by 5 degrees), or encoding it in morse. DERIVATIVE - The measure of the *rate* of change of a function (think acceleration as the derivative of speed) BTW I am in no way an expert on Physics, I just have enough math to understand the wiki definitions with some work
@Art.Magick4 жыл бұрын
This is pretty much how I research everything and I'm currently on LSD so I appreciate this comment.
@musicalfringe4 жыл бұрын
And that's why Wikipedia is useless for learning maths.
@jajayesyes13884 жыл бұрын
hahahaha
@roys42444 жыл бұрын
There are many thousands of comments here, but I am not sure whether anyone has attempted to describe any historical background to this work. Weinstein mentions work at the Oxford Mathematical Institute from the 1970s here (and even mentions my supervisor there), so I will provide some (rough) history. In the 1950s physicists Yang and Mills developed a generalisation of the Equations of Maxwell (for electromagnetism) suitable for the new world of quantum fields and quantum particles. What they discovered was that there was a quantum geometric symmetry - a circle - within Electromagnetism, now known as a U(1) symmetry. Their Yang-Mills theory kept the idea of the EM equations and replaced the group U(1) with potentially any such symmetry group, called by physicists a "gauge group". Ignored for a few years, physicists found the ideas worked well for groups SU(2) and SU(3) in the 1960s. Many Nobel prizes were won on the basis of related theories. Physicists continued to try to see if these Yang-Mills ideas worked for other groups, like SU(5). However as these groups get bigger more particles are predicted and these particles or their properties failed to be validated by CERN type experiments. Now the various ingredients of Yang-Mills theory are mathematical, and even geometric: symmetry groups, gauge invariance, field equations, etc and at Oxford mathematicians like Atiyah developed very general mathematical theorems based on this geometric set of ideas. These ideas bring in topology, manifold theory, algebra into the picture. These abstract theorems seem to have inspired Eric Weinstein (although he was not researching in Oxford, I believe). The other major heavily geometric theory in Physics is General Relativity, based on Manifolds also. So there are similarities with the Quantum Field mathematics when expressed geometrically. However there are also differences - this is why "Quantum Gravity" has not happened or been easy. One difference is that GR uses a "metric" of a special form, but these Yang-Mills theories dont use any metric. So "Geometric Unification" would give them a metric. Going the other way abstract mathematics would introduce "Torsion" - but GR has set Torsion = 0. Overall there has to be a "uniform manifold" - which I think Weinstein has made 14 = 4 + 10 dimensional. We are all familiar with the challenges that String theory has to justify physically its 10 or 11 dimensions, so a 14 dimensional manifold requires some justification. Weinstein's theory also predicts a larger gauge group - I think it is Spin(10). Particle physicists will want to know whether it predicts the right particles and properties. This is a very special type of calculation done in particle physics labs rather than in geometric mathematical Institutes. So we probably don't know, unless such work is published.
@HyperdriveAnthropology3 жыл бұрын
I have thought since about 2015 that there is an 18-dimensional unification. I'd like to know your thoughts. This theory was first proposed in literature /First published here by Baaklini: journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.25.478
@MultiAblee3 жыл бұрын
First of all thank you for the great overview! I am just a math undergraduate in his last few semesters and not a physicist by a long shot. So honest question, why is a 14 Dimensional Manifold a difficulty here? As far as I understand it the Problem of Stringtheory is that the Kaluza-Klein-Compactification of spacial dimensions not of symmetry dimensions is the problem. And Weinstein states here explicitly that (I think he calls it Endogenous Model) that U^14 is generated by X^4. So by Bundle theoretic viewpoints we should be in save waters there because our physical configuration space might be 14 dimensional but only 4 of those are spacetime and the other 10 are auxiliary symmetries like 2 U(1) and SU(2) and so on. Am I overlooking something here, I'd be really interested to know where if so but in any case thank you for your comment it really gave good context!
@sammykays88733 жыл бұрын
Could you please repeat that?
@simonmasters32953 жыл бұрын
@@sammykays8873 I doubt his attention span affords that luxury
@mcotter123 жыл бұрын
What do you mean by a circle within electromagnetism?
@ilovepainting19963 жыл бұрын
The Gods worriedly looked at each other. That night they drank coffee and double checked the source code of the sandbox. "They can't break out!" said Thor whilst staring into the glowing screen. "What if Hell breaks loose?!" said a buzzed Mars tightly clutching a mug emblazoned with "I love Physics".
@juanadrianarquinegogomez36103 жыл бұрын
Dude this is amazing!
@jamescrosby31053 жыл бұрын
I love this
@esquiro_cody2 жыл бұрын
Listen....write this book. I need it.
@jackkuehneman93004 жыл бұрын
I now know what a dog feels when it's owner leaves the radio on when they leave
@NoName-zn1sb4 жыл бұрын
!!!!!!!!! woof
@Caleb9834 жыл бұрын
Perfect description
@jcscbiz4 жыл бұрын
to the tee, that is funny!!
@skyblue99914 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@CultofThings4 жыл бұрын
Stay humble and keep listening. Like any language you need to immerse yourself, you need to stay curious, and most importantly you need to stay humble when you feel like you’ve learned all of it and you watch a video like this and realize you learned nothing.
@kikdolo76884 жыл бұрын
Who is here after the Joe Rogan episode??
@robertblake10324 жыл бұрын
Luis Martinez Me.
@bobthebuilder-nm5fz4 жыл бұрын
Right here
@drop-shot35974 жыл бұрын
Me
@valent_t4 жыл бұрын
Me too
@mirroredname33894 жыл бұрын
Im where ever i wanna be
@mpetry9123 жыл бұрын
I have watched this now a couple times and maybe understand about 1/4 of it, if that. But thank you EW for sharing this discussion and stretching out the scope of our understanding of the binding principles of the universe. Further I am in awe of EW's tenacity at building this complex theory of theories and then having the courage to put it out there and defend it. I'll run thru it a couple more times. Thank you, awesome, liked, subscribed and shared !
@ryanvsiler4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for taking a shot and putting this out here for us Eric, I appreciate it!
@jacobwood9694 жыл бұрын
Is this gonna be on the test?
@avitalmorgenstern4 жыл бұрын
In a couple of years
@4thgenamerican8762 жыл бұрын
Hopefully it will be multiple choice
@divyanshsati11162 жыл бұрын
Asking the real questions now!
@fandlpetroleum4 жыл бұрын
I like how at one point he says "the simplest theory" then spits out a string of words that made my brain drip out of my nose.
@SpencerTwiddy4 жыл бұрын
56:26 - 57:20
@zachglynn27924 жыл бұрын
look up 'The Law of One' by Ra
@inthefade4 жыл бұрын
Yeah no kidding. I often begrudge physics talks that dumb things down too much, but this is just outrageous! It was still fun to follow as much as I could, which was generously speaking about one eighth of it all.
@Explainmerandom4 жыл бұрын
The one two punch, first get them to lower their guard, then wham, hit em in the throat
@AJ-ii6fu2 жыл бұрын
Yea, it's almost like he's really effective at convincing people who are less intelligent than he is in math and physics that he knows what he's talking about.
@thebluriam3 жыл бұрын
I've given up coffee and now just listen to this first thing in the morning to get my day started off right
@tantrispicks24402 жыл бұрын
It would be great to see a follow-up with any new developments, and what kind of feedback Eric is getting from people who matter.
@florianstrauf53804 жыл бұрын
i'm just waiting for him to scribble down 42 at the end of the lecture.
@ivocanevo4 жыл бұрын
That would be the most elaborate April fools joke.
@rayal43954 жыл бұрын
Whats 42? Sorry for dumbos like me please
@user-mk2ur6hm2g4 жыл бұрын
@@rayal4395 42, in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams, is the "Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything", calculated by a supercomputer named Deep Thought over a period of 7.5M years. (I haven't read the book or seen the movie, but I remembered hearing it so I googled that for ya)
@rayal43954 жыл бұрын
マッケナポール thanks bud 👍
@jfumusic14 жыл бұрын
14 x 3 = 42
@kenhiett52664 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't usually spend time listening to a lecture I will have little ability to intelligably follow. However, due to the copious amount of excess time our virus has provided, (and my respect for Eric and his ideas) I'll give it a shot.
@ClassPunkOnRumbleAndSubstack4 жыл бұрын
Many people online claim they've done language learning over time through watching and listening to what starts out as mostly not possible for them to follow.
@TheMushybees4 жыл бұрын
Every 30 seconds I said out loud 'the what?' Chimeric tangent what? Fibre? I need a glossary. Possibly I need an education.
@Nameeejz4 жыл бұрын
@@ClassPunkOnRumbleAndSubstack This happens too with the technical terminologies of things, I learnt to sound semi-credible with economics like that! For languages its better if you also add some kind of reading stimulus like subtitles so you can better follow what is going on
@walperstyle4 жыл бұрын
we have so much amazing free content out there, but no way to structure it to easily learn it.
@MultiAblee4 жыл бұрын
@@TheMushybees I feel you, my guy... I mean I have the luxury of at least having dipped my toes already a bit into manifold theory and topology in my major. So by now, it doesn't sound like a foreign language to me but still like every third word I go like "Wait what the Space of Metrics over X^4 is a 14 dimensional Manifold U that has 10-dimensional fibres?! How? Why should be true? Well, time to dig in MathStackExchange answers :D"
@OPVSNOVVM Жыл бұрын
Please bring back the Portal! We need this podcast and the truths it discusses.
@haydenwayne3710 Жыл бұрын
Thank you. Thank you. THANK YOU!!!!! I so relate to your life struggle and totally agree about the "slings and arrows of outrageous fortune." I agree with being alone in discovery. It's not being anti-social, or that I couldn't find anyone "to play with." But, if it wasn't for my core center and my absolute refusal to do anything else but succeed in attempting to fulfill my vision, I wouldn't have succeeded in creating what I have thus far. I need to unpack your short hand so to be able to digest your presentation. I look forward to doing this. Thank you, again. Congratulations!
@vryc4 жыл бұрын
While the conversations with your varied list of guests has been wonderful, THIS is the juice I've been waiting for. Thank you.
@angadsawhney4 жыл бұрын
have
@akiotatsuki26214 жыл бұрын
@nymersic wow you opened my eyes, didnt even quantify that he is doing this just in case.
@misterkriskooper4 жыл бұрын
There's almost unlimited physics and TOE lectures on youtube. This is definitely one of the most advanced and dense available. Ive only skimmed through it but he seems to have some bold ideas while also suggesting other ideas that conflict with what we believe we know to be true about the standard model.
@simonmasters32953 жыл бұрын
Terrible waste of chalk...lol
@k4yser3 жыл бұрын
@@simonmasters3295 might you elaborate why?
@duncanhoward50454 жыл бұрын
Well, I never thought I'd enjoy listening to nearly 3 hours of constant whooshing sounds coming from somewhere above my head... But I did!
@razorback0z4 жыл бұрын
Same brother. But the whooshing sounds carried a lot of "weight", we both know it, thats why we are here.
@rccola5614 жыл бұрын
Hahahah that’s what that noise I was hearing was
@Truthkindnesslovefunhealth67 Жыл бұрын
I bow to you sir- such an eloquent and succinct introduction
@cypresshill83293 жыл бұрын
As a five year old child in first grade I couldn’t understand who decided what speed was, why telephones worked faster than the speed of sound and why had we limited ourselves to these constraints I’m now 60 and my interest is alive again. I intend commencing a Physics degree next month. Thanks for igniting my brain again mate
@canelocarnederescontaminad50483 жыл бұрын
How's your degree going? 👍
@Alexander-sz1jh3 жыл бұрын
That's so cool
@b.bruster14623 жыл бұрын
@@canelocarnederescontaminad5048 Slowly :). First semester starts Monday
@canelocarnederescontaminad50483 жыл бұрын
@@b.bruster1462 Congrats mate, I hope you enjoy it. Keep us posted on how you get on.
@K-A53 жыл бұрын
"Why telephones work faster than the speed of sound" Lol I love it! What a noodle scratcher. Its similar to why I wonder when you wiggle your toes theres no time delay between your intent to do so and the act of doing it. It seems instantaneous...but it can't be
@davehilton65234 жыл бұрын
I have no idea if you are right or wrong, Eric. I do, however, know that your endeavours with this theory are properly inspiring.
@BEDLAMITE-5280ft.4 жыл бұрын
Dave Hilton : weather he is right or wrong, I can assume that we both agree that he is sincere.
@JavierSanchez-mo2ef4 жыл бұрын
I agree
@rypaz874 жыл бұрын
@Helder Almeida Then you'll be happy to know that money probably is not an issue for Eric. As the managing director of Thiel Capital, he's most likely extremely financially secure.
@samyoungblood37404 жыл бұрын
Helder Almeida the “mainstream Scientists” didn’t want to Hear what Nikola Tesla had to say either. ✌🏽
@livingmodern Жыл бұрын
@@BEDLAMITE-5280ft. I think we need other physicists to give us the answer to that
@nataliebutler4 жыл бұрын
Nearly 2 hours in and I haven't understood a word so far, but I'm still here!
@LJdaentertainer4 жыл бұрын
That's because you're a sheep
@aZeddPrattFilm4 жыл бұрын
LJ :/
@Mevlinous4 жыл бұрын
No, I think it’s because she’s human
@alexrozenbom34304 жыл бұрын
This was not meant for general consumption.
@rccola5614 жыл бұрын
It’s like watching a movie in Mandarin
@AndyPhelps3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for sharing this Mr. W. Gonna take a while for me to wrap my head around it :)
@roberthuber27702 жыл бұрын
As someone working on my B.S. in physics and mathematics I find it very satisfying returning to this and understanding more and more over time.
@____uncompetative Жыл бұрын
There is twice as much in the draft paper, but KZfaq won't let me link it. However, I can refer to my answer to the Quora question: "What has happened with Eric Weinstein's unifying theory of everything?" which includes a link to the .pdf
@geometerfpv28049 ай бұрын
Seriously? This is complete nonsense. Please tell me as someone earning a B.S. in math that you realize the fact that he doesn't define any of these objects makes it meaningless? He's obviously not using any kind of standard definitions, because the typical meaning of "horizontal" and "vertical" as subbundles of the double tangent bundle is in contradiction with some of the most basic things he's saying...you should know better!
@roberthuber27709 ай бұрын
@@geometerfpv2804 I can understand your point of criticism regarding a lack of definitions. As a mathematician it's completely reasonable to hold Eric accountable for properly defining the objects he is working with. Maybe you can offer him that feedback somehow... I'm sure he would appreciate it. I guess, to play devil's advocate, Eric is working in the physics world where they are very loose with definitions. To make it clear though, I am not yet knowledgeable enough to identify the contradiction you mention. Can you elaborate on that for me please? Also, outside of the definitions, don't you think there's merit to relating various geometries in physics to investigate a framework for unification? It seems, at the very least, to be a good exercise.
@mrsideproject4 жыл бұрын
I have no idea why Im still watching this lol. I haven't understood a single word for the past hour and there's an hour to go but I'm not going anywhere.
@rayal43954 жыл бұрын
That’s coz you’re in lockdown son, and ain’t got anywhere to go 😆
@KaninTuzi4 жыл бұрын
It's oddly mesmerizing
@taz0k24 жыл бұрын
You might be involved the ancient spiritual act of worshipping intelligence
@Myrslokstok4 жыл бұрын
Michael Malo Not much different from uni studies, it is a normal feeling.
@ceezb56293 жыл бұрын
Facts... hunger to learn
@NewStuff184 жыл бұрын
Thank you Eric! Thank you for the courage in posting this! I know this was a huge event to announce this. Full support!
@tysebor76793 жыл бұрын
Hello Eric, You have inspired me. From high school I have had a love and natural talent in physics I am 22 years old and have recently completed my undergraduate BA in Mathematics. You have inspired me to return to learning physics and attempt to as you say "go beneath Einstein" and unearth the source code of the universe. I want to be able to understand the lingo that you use when explaining your theory so that I can see what you see and help you change the scientific community to become more genuine and open to new ideas. Based on everything I have been presented I am inspired to continue higher education in order to obtain a clear understanding of the math and physics that you use in your theory. I am doing this because I believe that you are attempting to create a clear understanding of something that humans have been unable to clearly understand to this day. And I believe that there is a theory out there that will explain all the rules of the game. Now I am writing about this at 4 in the morning after not completely watching your video but I will keep on attempting to understand the picture your theory creates. and one day help accelerate the process and avoid getting bogged down by the ridged and harsh structure of our current scientific community.
@ceezb56293 жыл бұрын
Brehhhhh... he inspired you but you didn’t watch the only video where he shows the world the theory he’s been working on for the last 15+ years.
@stumbling3 жыл бұрын
45:49 Aww, that moment Eric is like, "Oh shit, how many t's did I just put in matter?"
@danwhiffen92353 жыл бұрын
What does it mattter?
@Machiones3 жыл бұрын
Meaningwave Exists!!!
@richardarcilla4 жыл бұрын
I just turned 50 years old, 49 minutes ago. Watching this lecture is the first thing I did for my birthday. Thanks, Eric for this sleepless night :-)!
@Goettel4 жыл бұрын
Happy birthday, welcome to the League of 50 (another Richard :-) )
@zyzzbodybuilding4 жыл бұрын
Happy birthday 🎉🎂🎈🎂. What's being 50 is like? Does it feel like you have lived a long time? How have your ideas compared to when you were 21? Did you understand this lecture? I have only ever taken mechanics at college with some self learning online but this went over my head.
@richardarcilla4 жыл бұрын
propoetide Thanks! 😁
@richardarcilla4 жыл бұрын
Futuristic Gear Thanks! Its been a long time! But I still remember the first time I saw an episode of “Connections” where my mind was blown for the first time. I’m now fifty and I still am addicted to that explosion between the ears courtesy of Eric, Bret, Jordan, Ben, Sam, Heather, and others.
@Leoh14 жыл бұрын
to be honest that sounds like a pretty crappy lonely birthday
@tux19684 жыл бұрын
Any mathematical idea that includes a cow and magic beans sounds about right to me.
@briandegraw44454 жыл бұрын
The man is changing corners on us and then asking we offer such a family cow for magic beans. Null geodesics not connected, or all the same sphere smeared out??? Why don't we see this whole thoery?! Even the questions are multiple realizable.
@viktorxhelilaj30874 жыл бұрын
Even if you're wrong you have beautiful methods, things we can try to test, and ideas we can attempt to change our perspectives with!
@user-lu9hq6jv4v Жыл бұрын
A million thanks, for speaking so clearly to us, Sir!
@Kaiser684 жыл бұрын
Eric is the most interesting voice in the world today. Very few people are brave enough to even ask the questions he is making a bold attempt to answer. Bravo to you, sir. What an inspiration to the world!
@carlogomez82104 жыл бұрын
What is the question..?
@RVGENomini4 жыл бұрын
If I may, the difficult part isn't the bravery to ask questions, it's the hard work to build the knowledge that makes those questions possible.
@TaborTalk4 жыл бұрын
Kaiser68 agree
@mariaoharra3024 Жыл бұрын
What is his email contact?
@chuckles85194 жыл бұрын
Christ, I have a masters in theoretical physics and a PhD in statistics, and I have no idea what he's talking about here. Pretty humbling.
@KaizorianEmpire4 жыл бұрын
It's not that difficult. He's creating a system that transcends group or category theory in order to have a non contradictory maths network that can unify different mathematical physics equations in order to have a wholly consistent frame. Lol. In his ideation he's using a 4 dimensions fort instance axiom to reprisent nature. This seems arbitary but maybe it's to represent 4 forces of physics but I don't think that's it since this new theory assumes nothing in the physical world. If have gone with 0 dimensions . Anyways. He then wants to create differences in mathematical abstractions as scalers. So if you describe light in one equation you'd use a specific size and weight and scale that's consistent with other equations so therefore you'd be able to mix equations and no contradiction. You're using objective scaler functions. It's definitely going to solve alot.of problems . An example of this type of maths you can read about is univalent holotype theory. This is 22nd century maths
@forsaken8414 жыл бұрын
@@KaizorianEmpire oh, that explains it
@ryanlintott68494 жыл бұрын
@@forsaken841 It really doesn't...
@themysticfedora4 жыл бұрын
@@KaizorianEmpire its simple... We kill the Batman
@alexanderje83364 жыл бұрын
Well there goes my hope of ever understanding any of this 😂
@immanuelkant78953 жыл бұрын
I‘d be interested in listening to the afterwards q&a as well, is there any footage of that too?
@vastthegap33902 жыл бұрын
Thank you Eric and very elegantly said! I hope geometric unity acquires many more brilliant minds to work out the earth changing details!
@intrograted7924 жыл бұрын
00:00 Introduction 35:12 Lecture - Introduction (Marcus Du Sautoy) 37:48 Lecture - Main Presentation 2:13:25 Supplementary Explainer
@dissident32274 жыл бұрын
Hero
@akofr71422 жыл бұрын
🙏
@excelsior9992 жыл бұрын
2:14:00 Extra-Strength Tylenol.
@ericchin7392 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@____uncompetative Жыл бұрын
1:10:22 "Let's get started..."
@jlmer6164 жыл бұрын
I don’t have the words deserving of how glad I am you a starting up your own podcast. We now don’t have to rely on others to invite you to their show, to listen to your ideas.
@DamianWaynes Жыл бұрын
It is beyond words how incredibly brave this is.
@mpetry9123 жыл бұрын
Eric - this is a masterwork ! thank you. Liked and shared.
@shreddits6844 жыл бұрын
I felt like Harry Potter staring into the Pensieve watching an old lecture from Albus Dumbeldore
@CarmenSmithStuder4 жыл бұрын
Mathias Nesheim thx! That made me smile!!!
@BenDroRaDiO4 жыл бұрын
Thrive the movement youtube
@abunchofhooplah79084 жыл бұрын
That made me cringe bruh.
@chenmor17954 жыл бұрын
Beyond accurate.
@alexrozenbom34304 жыл бұрын
Its easier to understand dumbeldore.
@killthechemist4 жыл бұрын
appreciate you makin' my quarantine much more enjoyable, Eric!
@jengleheimerschmitt79414 жыл бұрын
Yeah... While I'm stuck at home this week, I figured I'd remodulate my dilithium crystals.
@jason14403 жыл бұрын
How many talented minds have been buried for being on the wrong side of others economic future?
@sarahvencill58903 жыл бұрын
Wow!That is both terrifying and exciting. Congrats.
@_Eamon4 жыл бұрын
Mr. Weinstein, I dont have a background in differential geometry, but in my quest for a Masters of Mech Engineering I have done quite a bit of linear algebra, differential equations, and dynamic systems modelling which apparently gives me enough of a vocabulary to read the wiki pages on these topics (plus my lifelong amateur interest in theoretical physics) and actually arrive at some level of understanding of what you're doing. So... though your theory might be flawed (I'm not expert enough to say), I would like to thank you for finally opening this world to me. This is a paradigmatic example of the portal. Just to give one example, I now believe I should have been told about metric spaces long before my high school physics class tried to teach time dilation. Things make much more sense now! I'm diving into your world and its very exciting! Thank you. Edit: I have to reiterate, it really is such a beautiful way you frame the question to say can everything come from almost nothing, and then begin with x 4 and a straight jacket. Seriously we need middle schools to be playing these games!
@bujin54554 жыл бұрын
I wish I had something material to add to this endeavor you're on Eric, but despite the fact I do not possess the tools needed to contribute directly, I would very much like to extend my gratitude and support for the fact you've held on and are stepping up. It takes strength and courage to do either, and I have a great deal of respect for your efforts. I wish you the very best of luck in this.
@The1belal4 жыл бұрын
Eric is so eloquent in utilizing his vocabulary, not a single boring moment !.
@The_Tiffster7 ай бұрын
Anyone can read big words, but his big words are covering for his lack of knowledge.
@The1belal7 ай бұрын
@@The_Tiffster I don't see him lacking knowledge....interesting you think that.
@bidask1232 жыл бұрын
I listened to this again. At around 42 minutes in, his description of what he is about to talk about and why is poetic.
@EnemyOfEldar4 жыл бұрын
I have a degree in theoretical physics, and I could not follow this -- simply because I do not know even a fraction of what he is talking about. That is my failure and not Eric's. But this sounds very very interesting. I implore you, Eric, to have the conviction to develop these awesome ideas in a 'rigorous way' . I'm no good at notation either, but I would say you need a completely unified notation system to tackle this potential path to a unified field theory! Don't let detractors squash you. You speak of the problems with academia and science -- problems I witnessed and experienced well enough while at the University, enough so to put me off ever wanting to persue a PhD (also, I am probably not smart or conscientious enough) -- and you suggest the action that will help alleviate the hostility any theorist faces when they are suggesting something so radical: pay them more. I agree. But until that happens neither you, nor I, nor any 1 person can make that change happen. It would have to be something we all come together for. Until then, don't let that system stop you. This is that. This video was you not letting them stop you. Carry on! You have my support, the support of your fans. You're a brilliant mathematician, theorist and scientist. Honestly. Even if this road leads to a dead end, it would be a glorious dead end. Godspeed man.
@borntobomb4 жыл бұрын
underrated response. Thank you.
@EtherDais4 жыл бұрын
Maybe you can comment on this heresy: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q7t0YK95sJ7Rgps.html
@guitar0wnz4 жыл бұрын
Seriously man I'm sitting here thinking what do I need to know to understand this premise
@littleripper3124 жыл бұрын
I disagree, he should be able to simplify the information enough for listeners to understand unless it's only information for his equal peers.
@carpathianhermit72284 жыл бұрын
@@littleripper312 you'd have to flesh out every concept before you talk about it. This is stuff the worlds greatest minds have problems with, its gonna be hard even with laymen version
@EvenGodsDie4 жыл бұрын
I love how this guy blows my mind. There is something about how he explains things. I hope he keeps up the good work.
@jc786073 жыл бұрын
I love this video, wish there was more of this. Would love to see you sit down with either a group, some supporters and some adversaries to go through this. As opposed to seeing them just try to fight the battle in the media you should challenge them, and if they will not accept to do it publicly, then just offer a donation or fundraiser.
@JeffCaplan3132 жыл бұрын
Actually, he already has been challenged. A Theo Polya and Tim Ngyuen have written a short response which includes a few pointed questions to Eric about this theory. Eric has not yet replied publicly to them, but I suspect it will be coming soon.
@collybeans586 Жыл бұрын
@@JeffCaplan313 Tim Ngyuen? I hope you are joking
@jackiechai96153 жыл бұрын
We all NEED TO THANK YOU. I feel hope for the first time since 1992 UCLA that I can get a job and I am not part of America’s throw away class anymore :) Godspeed Dr. - we desperately need you.
@mechanicaltimi1234 жыл бұрын
Not only is this enjoyable, but it shows you that a man can wear MANY hats.
@nickmagrick77024 жыл бұрын
but a gentleman can only wear a fedora
@alexrozenbom34304 жыл бұрын
Enjoyable? Are you a sadist ? This was gibberish all to about 100 people in the world.
@mechanicaltimi1234 жыл бұрын
@@alexrozenbom3430 It was an adventure in exploration of alternatives. It was beautiful to witness the road less traveled.
@alexrozenbom34304 жыл бұрын
@@mechanicaltimi123 i suppose, wadsworth
@epajarjestys99813 жыл бұрын
@@alexrozenbom3430 I think you mean masochist, not sadist.
@za0123456789987654324 жыл бұрын
This was amazing Eric. Somehow to the elgence and the beauty appears even though i don't understand one bit of the math. You truly are a great explainer. thank you.
@waytoomuchtimeonmyhands3 жыл бұрын
One day a year we should be allowed to share any and all of the ideas in our head. Eric this is the internet, sharing crazy ideas every day of the year is what it is all about.
@BillyMcBride3 жыл бұрын
I like what you are doing here, Eric. Thank you for providing us with some tools for which we may talk about the world in perhaps ways which have not yet been tried. About the general case of Geometry I feel that it will forever be connected as a word with Plato, who as you know said, whoever does not know Geometry cannot enter the doorway of his school, The Academy. Whatever must have been inside that Academy, in those rooms must have been very interesting constructively so as to call for a prior knowledge of Geometry by those who enter. You speak of much, I recall, of the outside, which is what is not measured but which contains data making for an asymmetry between that inside the Academy outside the Academy relationship disproportional. And, I like the case that with some of the interior walls of the Academy, you are trying to break down so that those in other rooms may communicate, and have something to talk about that can be shared, or unified even. And, the same goes for the wall of Plato’s Academy which separates the inside from the outside. Doing so would truly be a feat of inclusion! Aside from Plato, I read and reread much more Homer, especially the Iliad, where what separates the Greeks from the Trojans is not just the wall which surrounds the city of Troy, but another geological feature, a linear one, which happens to be the River Scamander, the very one Achilles fights as it represents one of the Gods, but he overcomes it and goes on to call out his foe, Hector from the walls to challenge him to death. If Greek Plato has the Academy as a border between knowledge and common opinion, and the landscape of Ilium of Homer has the River Scamander as a border between enemy and enemy, then the way to Unify Plato’s wall, and the way to Unite the opposing Armies of Greek and Troy, may look the same “geometrically” but in fact have a difference in compatibility. Perhaps those of the opinions for Plato represented the poets, those on the outside, whereas those who seek knowledge were the insiders within the Academy. Just as in Homer‘s story, there is a battle in Plato’s too where instead of the Greeks versus the Trojans, there was the poets versus the philosophers, Plato on the side of the philosophers, and Homer on the side of the poets. The only person I have ever seen try to unite successfully poetry with philosophy was the American pragmatist, Richard Rorty, a personal hero of mine, my Spiritual Brother. I have paused your lecture to give me a break to write this, but I am listening with enjoyment your ideas. Thank you again for your work. - Billy M.
@rocknrolladube4 жыл бұрын
Oh boy...I'm saving this for Friday night! Thank you Eric...you are a great man!
@Tyrael764 жыл бұрын
To provide some context to non-physicists/mathematicians about the level of material in this lecture: I've recently finished my master's in physics at Oxford, where a lot of my lectures actually took place in the very lecture theatre Eric is standing in here. I'd say I was able to *somewhat* follow the flow of concepts being discussed, and I had to take most of the maths as a given. I would need time, probably on the scale of year(s), of studying - particularly around groups and gauge theory - to actually be able to follow the maths presented here.
@bobbysanchez63084 жыл бұрын
I have many questions and I am fascinated by this anecdote. Is there any way that I could contact you?
@krueppelkind4 жыл бұрын
To me as an outsider of the academic field i`ve find it impossible to figure out Dr. Weinstein, he might be an "Idiot savant" for all i know. Should he be the real deal though, humanity's fate could rest on the shoulder of those whom exploring and publishing his works. Hugh risks involved for those whose sacrifice months of their time to investigate but what could be the outcome?
@chazmabry3 жыл бұрын
Hey. This makes me feel less dumb. I really appreciate that actually.
@jamesfrancese60913 жыл бұрын
You have a master’s in physics but don’t know classical gauge theory? Ok.
@AstroPatel3 жыл бұрын
@@jamesfrancese6091 I probably won't know it either by the time I pass my quals (equivalent of a master's). Then again, I'm in Astrophysics so my time is better spent learning other things. But the PhD program is simply in "Physics". The field of physics as a whole is huge, fundamental physics (what Eric talks about) isn't the same as other fields. Astrophysics, cosmology, material physics, condensed matter physics, high energy physics, geophysics, biophysics, particle physics, QM, QFT, etc...
@debuggerau3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing, impressive, well done !
@odaydrums3 жыл бұрын
As an artist I think and feel that your closing statement summed up the rest of it for me. And God knows as hard as I tried I understood about less than 1%.
@onseayu4 жыл бұрын
i honestly don't know anywhere near enough to understand the lecture(s), but i''m very happy for you, and selfishly really glad that mr. thiel was able to recognize your brilliance.
@kipling19574 жыл бұрын
I was compelled to listen the whole lecture, fairly clueless. Phrases like, “pulling back on the cotangent bundle” gradually became deeply meaningful. Like jazz. I definitely think Eric is onto something. There’s no doubt about it. Now I need to take another mushroom.
@slart1bartfast5874 жыл бұрын
Yeah, no. "Pulling back on the cotangent bundle" doesn't become "deeply meaningful" to you just because you hear it being said 5 times in an hour. Taking a couple of courses on differential geometry on the other hand might help you with that.
@kipling19574 жыл бұрын
@@slart1bartfast587 Erm...it was meant as a joke.
@slart1bartfast5874 жыл бұрын
@@kipling1957 Yeah, sry. It is really hard to discern who is joking and who isnt. Some guys write stuff like that in all earnest.
@kipling19574 жыл бұрын
@@slart1bartfast587 Yea, it's my dry Brit humor, sorry about that. It would be nice to have a second career in a different domain though. Cheers!
@ashiamonteiro48864 жыл бұрын
.....Thank you brother....thank you!!Your courage and strenght is beyond conceptual construct
@AtlantisStarseed8 Жыл бұрын
New to this channel. LOVE IT!!!!! WE MORE OF THIS ❤
@magnificentrob55714 жыл бұрын
I’ve been waiting for this for ages!
@logana18134 жыл бұрын
funny to think that in 100 years time this could be seen as the most important lecture of all time
@nfevelo4 жыл бұрын
Or a 1000 years from now when we bounce from our galaxy !
@Les5374 жыл бұрын
Or totally forgotten as more meaningless string theory math noise.
@wasupgaming4 жыл бұрын
@@Les537 this isnt string theory
@lw53594 жыл бұрын
Or the biggest April Fools joke of all time.
@TheJeremyKentBGross4 жыл бұрын
Yeah. If this leads to faster than light travel it will still probably be 100 years or more before that result is practically able to be put to use.
@elliottwade19013 жыл бұрын
Amazing, well-articulated and very poignant backstory that accompanies this brave presentation. I'm sure there are many people who, like me, are with you, Eric.
@Pepi867532 жыл бұрын
Lol
@quantumtrinityministry53753 жыл бұрын
This is a fascinating theory. I believe this will be the next “big” discovery, and the biggest discovery in my lifetime, thus far.
@anthonygarzo86044 жыл бұрын
"Greatness looks like madness until it finds context." The portal collective rides with you, Eric, into the horizon not yet known. Thank you for everything; your life's work enriches us with hope.
@carrottoponcrak3 жыл бұрын
Dancing is madness if one cannot hear the music
@1121tristan4 жыл бұрын
I am very dumb when it comes to math but I get the same feeling of awe, inspiration, and beauty with this as I do with beautiful classical music. Thank you, Eric.
@soulsfang4 жыл бұрын
Honestly, thats a really, really apt comparison. I'm a student currently just entering into physics, and I don't have the first clue what he is saying mathematically, but it is in a certain sense like music. You don't have to understand the time signatures, structure, or individual notes, you simply admire the beauty of the composition and awe at the fact that a human could produce such brilliance.
@stefanovergari98154 жыл бұрын
@@soulsfang i don't almost any knowledge of phisics, but i take it the same way, like when use to listen to music in english when i didn't know the language, you follow your feelings, like when he first mentioned the e8 structure of the li group (on which garret lisi, an outsider of phisics, was working) as the most important structure in the universe, i suddendly believed he was on something, sometimes you have to listen to your gut feelings, like he is doing since he was 18
@alanunruh73103 жыл бұрын
i'm so happy i got to finally see this!!!!!!!!! geometry was my first love in mathematics it took my to Trig and finally landed me in electromagnetics and Logic control systems. Boolean expressions still make me giggle in how something so simple can creating VASTLY complicated logic!! Some of this makes perfect sense to me other parts are admittedly over my head.. but i believe with time and more reading could be learned. but most of all i feel like your so much more onto something with this than anyone in the past 40 years as even attempted most likely out of fear of being cast out for not agreeing with the almighty that is einstein and GR. THANK YOU for shedding your fears long enough to expose us all to this and letting us breath fresh air on the matter!!!
@mesokosmos22123 жыл бұрын
For the first time I see ToE built from ground up to the strange bundles and shiabs. Ouroboroish recursion is so fundamental in computation, I have wondered why anyone hasnt taken it further than Escher drawings in physics, but now it was. Hope to see more this sort of presentations.
@deetimeless58364 жыл бұрын
I have a graduate degree in physics. Here is a summary I made that gives some background and perspective to the level and type of math to understand Eric's ideas. I hope it helps some folks. Each level designates a major increase in complexity, and can roughly (though not necessarily intended to) correlate to: 0 elementary school, 1 high school, 2 undergraduate, 3 graduate, 4 PhD/post grad/professional. MATHEMATICS 0 Numbers, number line, arithmetic, circles, squares, triangles. 1 Variables, equations, algebra, exponents, quadratic equation. Functions and graphs. Simple vectors. Geometry (pi, area, volume, lines, graphs), trigonometry, log. 2 Calculus, differential equations including partial differential, linear algebra (systems, matrices, operators), Euclidian vector spaces and vector calculus. Complex analysis is useful. 3 Abstract algebra (mappings, groups, rings, fields, especially group theory and group representations). Lie groups (importantly the Poincare group). Basic differential geometry, in particular Riemannian geometry in conjunction with tensor calculus. (Affine geometry is useful too). Exterior algebra. 4 Topology (point-set, algebraic including cohomology, and differential), differentiable manifolds, differential forms. Fiber bundles: associated bundle, principle bundle, tangent and cotangent bundles. Category theory and functors. Vector-valued differential forms, specifically Lie algebra-valued forms and adjoint bundles. Killing fields, Clifford algebra, Weyl algebra, Hopf bialgebra are useful. PHYSICS 0 Motion, matter, basic concept of energy, atoms. Dimensions of space. Electricity. Magnets. 1 Newton's laws including gravity. Kinetic and potential energy and momentum. Elementary particle physics. Electric current, Ohm's law, electric and magnetic fields. Optics is useful. 2 Classical mechanics (coordinate systems, equations of motion, classical waves). Electromagnetism, potentials, Maxwell's equations. Quantum mechanics (Schrodinger equation, electronic structure of atom). Special relativity (Minkowski spacetime, 4-momentum). 3 Advanced mechanics: Lagrangian, Hamiltonian, variational principle, Noether's theorem. Quantum theory: Hilbert space, quantum harmonic oscillators, Dirac equation and Dirac spinors. Basic quantum field theory (i.e. canonical quantization), quantum electrodynamics. General relativity. 4 Gauge field theories, Yang-Mills equations, electroweak unification, quantum chromodynamics, standard model unification. Higgs mechanism. General theory of spinors. Modern formalism of general relativity. Note that M theory (supersymmetry, supergravity, superstrings) is good to be aware of but appears at odds with experimental evidence.
@T_Fizzle4 жыл бұрын
Get Khan on this now!
@domcasmurro24174 жыл бұрын
I dont know if you tried to impress peo plewith your comment, but Physics is very simple, is not some misterious realm. Eric Weinstein is not the guardian of some secret knowledge that is not available for the rest of us. The scientific comunity dont take his delusions of importance seriously.
@zblofu4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this. I am commenting so I can save your list when I am not on a phone.
@snafuagain52683 жыл бұрын
Dom Casmurro ...Dom Dom Dom, U Such A Ding Dong! Go back to watching Sesame Street! 🤣🤣🤣😆
@Furrierity3 жыл бұрын
@Bichi Ranga never too late to learn brother
@brandondeanlowery83734 жыл бұрын
I was told there would be no math.
@blueredandyellow83894 жыл бұрын
There is no math. There's some alien physics mind f* however
@ariangorman23253 жыл бұрын
It was a great but somewhat confusing vid. I love the work you do and most all expressed views. I want to learn the math on a deeper level as you do. Also, string theory expressed as a ship in the bottle on a fundamental level was a great thought experiment and idk if I'll ever understand unless we figure out dark matter and energy, or as a result of our motion in reference to the larger spacetime, or ever expanding spacetime fabric and the variance between string theory and GR. But I don't understand GL4R, you're amazing dude
@wecantry43933 жыл бұрын
Keep imagining. Good work professor.❤
@unchartedexe4 жыл бұрын
We need to get more eyes on this.
@skyblue99914 жыл бұрын
I'm sure it'll reach the people it needs to reach.
@MrGonzonator4 жыл бұрын
Congratulations, Eric, you've finally sold the Turbo encabulator.
@goyonman96553 жыл бұрын
that's harsh
@AZRogue3 жыл бұрын
I can hardly wait until it's assembled and ready to be transmitted.
@christinley52133 жыл бұрын
You have my interest sparked!I follow alot of the phisist , quantum phisist and mathmatitions...but there's just something about you..I'm just gonna keep my ears eyes open and see where you go with this;) luv ya man..your a good human!
@zacke64 жыл бұрын
Listening to you is like finding a trancendental pirate treasuremap
@faheyplayer4 жыл бұрын
What is it about this talk that I scarcely understand that made me listen to all of it; there is brilliance and light here, says my intuition.
@lexusmaxus3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Eric W for your unbelievable courage
@Beachswag7573 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your work
@Talisman-tb6vw4 жыл бұрын
I watched the whole presentation. I have spent my career doing 2 things. Solving other people’s problems and doing what others say can’t be done. I was a design engineer at Intel, a project engineer at HP and I was a business owner building the things that others said couldn’t be done - like wifi and Bluetooth. Physics and Mathematics were both my favorite courses in college. Back in my high school days, I did a version of a ship in a bottle. Not once, but 3 times I put a garbage can on top of the schools flag pole - without using a ladder - without scaling the pole at all. My feet never left the ground. Just because a Mathematician or a Physicist hadn’t thought of it - doesn’t mean it can’t be done. "Everything is impossible until somebody does it" (Einstein)
@PieLogic4 жыл бұрын
Well said! The paradigm shift has begun. “The world as we have created it is a process of our thinking. It cannot be changed without changing our thinking.” (Einstein) Let's fix the math based upon truth not greed.
@BiancaAguglia4 жыл бұрын
Your comment makes me think you have both the mindset and the skillset of a problem solver. Are there any textbooks or other sources of information you'd recommend for problem solving in general and for engineering in particular? I've been spending the past year learning data science (and Python) and I realize now that I'm terrible at designing systems. When I start with someone else's defined problem, their datasets and systems, I can do a decent job at analyzing and interpreting the data. When I start with my own problem though, I struggle with creating efficient, scalable ways of organizing data, processing it, maintaining it, etc. Engineering would help me get better at systems design, so I'm looking for recommendations on good books to start with. Thank you. 🙂
@Eu4ic4 жыл бұрын
So how did you get the trash can up there? Asking for a friend...
@alexbarber15664 жыл бұрын
@@Eu4ic also asking for a friend
@Talisman-tb6vw4 жыл бұрын
@@Eu4ic using the rope and eyelets for the flag, I put eyelets at the same spacing on a pole so that the bottom eyelet was at the bottom of the pole, the upper eyelet was about at just below the middle of the pole and the rest of the pole that was above was just slightly longer than the trash can was deep. Hooked the pole to the eyelets, put the trashcan on the pole, keeping the rope tight, hoisted the trashcan up the flagpole until it was over the top of the flag pole. Released the tension on the rope, brought my pole back down and unhooked it from the eyelets. Tied the rope back onto the flagpole. And waited for the "officials" to get upset. :) its somewhat the same principle of how extension cranes work, cables inside the tubes pulling from a pulley at the top to pull the bottom up, extending the tube, making the crane tube longer.
@eddiesavitz9954 жыл бұрын
Eric, I hope you read comments. I've been waiting years for this. I've had my suspicions of what you were getting at based on comments that you've made in the past. Good for you putting it out there. I hope you and your family are well. Best, C
@sethreynolds41863 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this so much!!!!
@RR-yx5ux3 жыл бұрын
I feel like he comes up with the analogies first and the maths afterwards xD
@MultiAblee4 жыл бұрын
I was a mathmajor being in my third semester when I listen to you talk about gauge theory. Now almost a year , a bachelorsthesis on differential topology and a lot of home studying on differential geometry later you drop this gem. I feel so stoked about the process of understanding this. Might take another year until I understand what fully takes place here but I already know I'll come back to this again and again and again until I get it!
@IamPotato_0074 жыл бұрын
I started my maths classes. Refreshing. I didn't graduate in mathematics but biology but delved till fourier transform. I gotta go a long way
@MultiAblee4 жыл бұрын
@@tactics40 man to understand pullbacks and 1-forms properly you really have to have a solid grasp on the tangentspace und the differential or push forward. I remember around christmas when I wrote on my thesis, banging my head against that wall of a definition for about 6-7 hours straight and finally getting a working version of it in my mind. So if you're not offended by that, that's pretty impressive!
@calvinlegend22504 жыл бұрын
Eric, I've been a fan for quite some time now and I just want to say that I'm so proud of you for doing this! It makes me quite emotional to see you so nervous as you put this all out on the line, but since you are now in a position to sustain yourself economically, you are free to work on this theory without being hindered by the need of approval of broken institutions which you are expected have in order to build a career. Needing only one's self to prop yourself up, you are free to discover the secrets of the universe. Furthermore, because your platform is on the internet, a special opportunity materializes, in that you may debut your findings quickly- or even as they happen with live video, all while making it impossible for bad actors to not credit you. You have inspired the minds of curious individuals, and we, your subscribers, thank you deeply for this.
@glittersausage70064 жыл бұрын
hear, hear
@JTDesign1 Жыл бұрын
There are aspects of Eric's insight which are now undeniable. The first 10 min's are now spot on considering it was 3 years ago. No open dialog during the pandemic is now a sad reality.
@niklasmarrnielsen3 ай бұрын
Yeah it's freaky
@GeoffGroves3 жыл бұрын
Noble aspirations Eric. I think with A.I we will get closer, as there are paradigms involved which no human can comprehend, but whatever A.I discovers, it won't mean anything to us :-)
@clutchlesss17104 жыл бұрын
How he was describing his hypothesis, all I could see is how if you watch the translations from the Riemann hypothesis on the complex plane. How at the underlying structure itself loops back onto itself. granted that is a 2d function.. this goes much deeper than that. 3blue1brown has a great video describing the motion I'm talking about. I'm at the edge of my limits with that abstraction though. Assuming his mathematics is correct, it's a great starting point for figuring out the universe. Good video Eric
@ludvigstrom4 жыл бұрын
Those chalk boards are so flimsy they are bending the space time continuum when he draws on them.
@excelsior9992 жыл бұрын
Funny.
@Alekosssvr3 жыл бұрын
A math teacher at Purdue would often start a sentence with "Clearly,......" when he was about to say something completely incomprehensible.... Would teach in a class room with a blackboard on three walls and would point to different points like a conductor.
@tommykoed74933 жыл бұрын
😅😅👌
@tinytim71301 Жыл бұрын
The tyrants are revealing leaders, and a special Thanks to JRE for talking to this guy. This dude has brains and balls. 💪🤘🏼👍.