Lg

I am no expert but believe that if you already have a right of way over the land, then you have permission to use that land. You cannot claim AP on land you have permission to use.

@@Swintech42 Thanks for the info. This puts things into perspective and is very helpful.

how did u find title holder???

​@@rossbattaglia8132title holder information is typically disclosed on the corresponding 'proprietorship register'.

How did this turn out, I’m looking at a similar situation.

it's as you were informed. i have seen a few...i'm starting this now. but??? be warned...after what i thought were run down, abandoned properties...i later found some poor old or mentally ill person was living there in terrible conditions. Although...by that process i ended up find which were actually empty

I am not a lawyer, but I think I know the answer to your question. You need to use it for the 10 years as your own, and the fact you know it is not your land, you would have to prove you meant to exclude all others including the registered owner

@@kelfbk6So my partner and i got quite lucky with regards to my front yard....we contacted the local authority who own the front yard about seeking adverse possession and we were informed that they would be more than happy for us to purchase the garden for £1 since the previous owners were the ones who looked after the property for over 15 years and as long as we were happy to pay the legal fees regarding the sale which we have both agreed on and have since acquired the 40 square meters and substantially increased the property value by £15k now that we have the deed to the land

any luck?

@@srahman3398 the channel owner has not replied yet

What photos and statement did you have ready? I am about to lodge a application myself just wnna make sure ive got everything i need lol.

@@srahman3398 we are in the same boat, i havent started. I wanted more specific advice from the channel owner

You don't state exactly what proves the system is bent! Bent implies corrupt to me, but I fail to see how it is corrupt. For argument's sake, what would happen to land owned by someone who died and left no heirs?

@@markrichardson7316 itd go to the crown. system is bent but not because adverse possession exists lol...

Well of course the system is bent don’t be so silly what made you think it wasn’t??? At the end of the day the laws are there to support the people who decide them not the people they apply to. Why would the laws do anything but? Just because the people making them virtue signal about justice and wear fancy robes and talk with an upper crust accent doesn’t make them any less criminal or fair. it’s just fancy wording that gives the impression of Thanos there is no such thing in law, everyone knows that! Why do you think the British rebellions existed, why do you think the dispossessed try to find loopholes? If I want Allodial (actual ownership) title fundamentally the only way for me to do that is to defend my land from both the police and the Crown which means the military if I can do that and I stick a flag on it it’s mine and they can bugger of… That’s how it works, all the laws are fundamentally enforced by the use of threats of violence and force. So it’s the biggest bully on the block wins and it always has been- Were you under the illusion that wasn’t the case? Fundamentally the system always supports power not poverty always it will always find a way to harm the dispossessed. Millions and millions of pounds on spent in the UK every day by NGOs which are essentially linked to government in order to maintain homelessness not solve it but maintain it it’s a necessary part of society to have a human disposal shoot to get rid of the human garbage or anyone who doesn’t fall into line with the system fundamentally it’s a form of social acceptable eugenics. This ugly treat is kept away from the beautiful people such as the man in the video and those who are protected and paid for by the system I have nothing against them but if they could see the reality I think their brains would explode. Since these people more than anybody seem to think that there is such a thing as justice and law they have no idea that it’s all predicated on lies and at the bottom those lies become incredibly clear and blatant for all to see- Fortunately such individuals remain and would never wish to be exposed to such harsh realities if any of them want to come and spend a day with me with a video camera we could make a lovely documentary about how this country is full of corruption but none of them would be interested. These people are kept safe from the harsh reality that they are helping to create because they never see the end results of it.

The only aspect of this subject that's bent, is the fact crown land enjoys much more protection on this.

We are being told the law. Not stealing.

lol stealing GFY, land is one of those goods that is not created by any affect of man's own labour, it never deserved to be privately owned in the first place. the only act(s) of theft was the inclosure acts in the 1600s that took away from the commons in the first place

Perhaps some of the aristocracy realised that the dispossessed peasants still require some human rights?? Almost seems like an act of compassion quite frankly. I mean that used to be what made a person noble!

Not stealing if you take and abandoned and derelict property, refurbish it and put it to good use.

@@adrianmargean3402 so you think the law should decide what you can do with your lawfully owned private property?,say you have an overgrown green field which you want to leave uncut and untouched for environmental purposes,someone comes along mows it, puts down concrete hard standings and applies for adverse possession should they get your land? should one persons idea of "good use" overpower another persons idea of "good use" ,do you like the US system where lawns and yards have to be kept to a standard decided by the state or risk repossession or prefer the UK idea of "an English mans home is his castle"