I agree.

Rich kid tech bros with no personality or set of beliefs using a few lines from something a drug addicted murderer wrote decades ago, and using that to create a already known philosophy with an added bit that allows them to manipulate other people for money and so they can not feel inferior due to their lack of personality while having their moral integrity maintained? Well I’ve never!

I guess because a self fulfilling prophecy isn't a concept with a strict definition you can talk about to a professor

It's nonsense.

Actually fitting

I am currently, actually.

@@DamonD_Absences and?

@@DamonD_Absences3 years man, your course has to be over by now right?

Basically a branch of systems theory concerning feedback mechanisms.

The situationists used to do things similar to the example

Yes

fr they always be doing time sorcery n shit and drafting mfs into the time war 😒

Lol, yet so little praxis is done with it

Both of these comments could be an epitaph for humanity

Gained from this? Are you aware this has no leverage,that once it starts there is no turning back.We are playing with concepts that should be in a Lovecraft story

My knee-jerk reaction is to say no but I'd need to think about it more

Lol nah i get it // it just has that same feel to me idk but that doesn't dismiss it or anything if anything it makes it a little more easier to explain, shit i think land was a little inspired by bauillard thru certain examples and terms land uses

@@RVGODZILLA Well, one could say that hyperstition is the inverse of simulacrum, since in the case of hyperstition you must go through simulacrums of the hyperstitious term (instead of "term' you might say "object") to get to the ideal hyperstitious term, while in the case of simulacra you descend from the ideal term down to simulacrums of that ideal term. You can also say that Baudrillard's simulacrum is just a simulacrum of the Platonic simulacrum, since Plato was the first to invent the concept of simulacrum. Deleuze, unlike Baudrillard (and unlike Plato), doesn't see simulacrum as less worthy than the ideal term, he regards it as a copy of the ideal term (or better to say "of the starting term", to avoid idealisation) which contains difference. Consequently, Deleuze (imo) wouldn't idealize the becoming-hyperstitual of the term. For him the hyperstitual would be simply a function of the joint experimental production of linguistic, literal, scientific and philosophical machines... Production of the new?

Naked Lunch

@@NotActually thanks

Arthur Verocai - Na boca do sol

It's the METAL FINGERS mix: Orris Root Powder.

This is why retroactivity comes into play, I don't think a hyperstiton is a hyperstition before it actualizes itself; before actualization it is just another idea. After actualization however, it is quite literally as if that idea has always been hyperstition, all the way since the beginning.

Naked Lunch!

@@NotActuallycould we say that civilization as a concept is a hyperstition?

I believe that utopia is already a hyperstition

No lmao. Hyperstition needs to exist one day

There is no 'could'; only 'will'. And the answer is NO :)