Wow amazing. Thanks for taking the time to share this.

Do you still have that tape? If you are not lying, then this is some scientifically relevant stuff

I love your story! Thank you for sharing.

​@inimene3796 If you'd read the post correctly, you'd have your answer. Tbh, your needlessly rude comment probably impedes any desire to reply.

"how's this one" as in I can make up stories too? to which I would answer ...prove it

I totally believe you. Many similar experiences. Thank you for sharing. ❤️🙏🏻❤️

@@audioworkshop1 it must be difficult to have your perception; to need everything “proven” and confront things as skeptical (which at times can be healthy). The energy you spent writing that unproductive and negative retort you could’ve used looking at the person next to you and focusing on how you could love them more or help learn to love and accept. So in other words, “piss off, you wretched twat”.

What a wonderful story! Thank you for taking the time to share it. 🥰

@@audioworkshop1 Idiot. What are you, 12? You have to have everything proven? You haven't an instinctual nature? "I love you." "Prove it." Wow... life must be a joy with you.

🐟 09. REINCARNATION (OR NOT): There is NOTHING about the individual person (that is, the “ego”, as defined in the following chapter) which transfers to another body after death, except, perhaps, habitual tendencies in the form of indelible mental impressions (“vāsanā”, in Sanskrit). For example, in my present incarnation, I have a strong affinity for the culture of Bhārata (India), a highly-advanced intellectual capacity, a very slim body, and an attraction to a frugivorous diet. That suggests there was an Indian spiritual master in the previous century which had some (or perhaps, even all) of these characteristics, but it was not “ME”, since what I am now is this ever-mutable Australian-born Aryan gentleman. These “subtle mind impressions” are known in psychology as the “collective unconscious”, in new-age spirituality as the “akashic records”, and in Islam as the “Preserved Tablet”. There is an abundance of evidence that humans are born with certain psycho-emotive links to previous persons, times and places. It is far beyond the purview of this document to list such evidences. As mentioned, in my case, I have an EXTREMELY strong association with all things Indian, despite not being of Indian origin, and the “collective unconscious” hypothesis seems to be the best explanation for this bond currently available, in my opinion (although the term “collective conscious” would, perhaps, be more accurate). For the popular view of reincarnation to be plausible, there would need to be an entity or an OBJECT called a “soul” (“jīva” or “ātman”, in Sanskrit), which somehow finds a copulating couple, then enters the woman’s uterus, to inhabit a zygote. Assuming the existence of an individual spiritual soul is profoundly illogical, because spirit is (by most definitions) the antithesis of finite matter. Therefore, how can an immaterial “soul” be confined to a single person’s body? It seems rather strange to believe that the universe was organized naturalistically in such a manner as to recycle an object called a “soul”, or even to recycle minds, particularly when one understands that a mind is naught but a series of flickering thoughts, feelings, and memories. Some believe that the “thing” which transfers to the next incarnation are the remnants of one's actions (“vāsanā” or “saṃskāra”, in Sanskrit) or at least one's psychological disposition (likes, dislikes, phobias, etcetera). This is far closer to the idea of the collective unconscious, and even if it is a perfectly accurate account of what occurs after death, it still cannot give substance to the notion of a SEPARATE individual which is travelling from one body to another and again to another (“saṃsāra”, in Sanskrit). According to the law of conservation of energy, first proposed and tested by Émilie du Châtelet, energy can neither be created nor destroyed; rather, it can only be transformed or transferred from one form to another. Both this law, and Dr. Leonard Susskind's minus-first law of physics, states that energy/information is indestructible. The analogy of one candle being lit by another candle is apt. Are the two flames the same flame or completely different flames? According to those laws, PART of the energy is transferred from one wick to the other wick, a portion of the energy is released by the flame, and part of the energy remains with the original candle. Regarding reincarnation, a rather appropriate analogy could be that of a whirlpool in a stream of liquid. A whirlpool is a definite form within a river but, just like the human form itself, it is never static. Some water molecules which were once swirling within one whirlpool may move farther downstream, mix with other water particles, and form a new, distinct whirlpool. So, in my particular case, it is eminently possible that a vast amount of “Indian energy” was transferred to my psyche from one or more persons from Bhārata (the proper name of the country), plus the addition of genetic matter from my Persian parents and their Aryan heritage. The fact that BOTH Iranians and North Indians are Aryan seems to add further credence to my hypothesis, even if to a small degree. Of course, there is no conclusive proof for such types of claims at this stage in human history, but the evidence is certainly extant, and as mentioned, the profusion of evidence available goes far beyond the purview of this document. One ought to do one's own thorough research into the matter, rather than relying on anecdotal testimonies. There are several well-documented books and videos published on the subject. There is not the slightest doubt in my mind that my essential nature has NOT transferred from one body to another body, because I have fully understood and realized, by practicing the four systems of yoga/religion described in Chapter 16, that my true nature is Brahman (see Chapters 06 & 10 to learn of the Real Self). There is no such thing as a “soul” or “spirit”, unless, of course, one defines those words to mean the subject (that is, the observer of all temporal phenomena), and logically, the subject cannot be an object, at least in the transactional sphere. When I die, my physical body, composed of the five gross material elements (“sthūla-śarīra”, in Sanskrit), will be reabsorbed into the biosphere, whilst the non-tangible aspect of my body, composed of the three subtle material elements (“sūkṣma śarīra”, in Sanskrit), will possibly merge with the collective unconscious, and the story of my life will come to an end FOREVER. See Chapter 05 regarding the eight elemental groups. It seems likely, judging by the evidence, that the “vāsanā” of a deceased person may transfer to more than a single individual. That explains why there are so many persons at once claiming to be the reincarnation of certain famous personalities. This fact is difficult for many to accept, since they are thoroughly attached to their pseudo-egos, their intellects, their minds, their bodies, and their possessions. However, when one realizes that one is, fundamentally, not an ever-mutating psycho-physical organism, but, essentially, never-changing, all-pervasive CONSCIOUSNESS, all fears are alleviated. The only “thing” remaining of a person at the time of death is the only “thing” which has ever “existed” - Pure Unalloyed Awareness, or Eternal-Conscious-Peace (“sacchidānanda”, in Sanskrit). We do not normally dread the dreamless portions of our nightly sleep cycles, so why would we fear a more permanent period of existence similar to deep-sleep? This existential crises is the basis of most all angst and uneasiness. So, fear not - death is a normal, NATURAL, and even a necessary consequence of conception. That which has a beginning, surely must end. Putting aside whether or not reincarnation is an accurate account of what happens in this world, it is ABSOLUTELY certain that we receive a completely new body approximately every seven years (via a gradual process, of course). Our first body was a microscopically-sized zygote and our present body is several kilograms heavier. From where has all that extra weight come? Obviously, it came from all the nutrients that we have absorbed via the umbilical cord in our mother's uterus, or via the food, air and water we have consumed since birth. Cont...

Therefore, one who believes that he is nothing more than the body-mind organism is grossly ignorant of basic biological science. Genetically, approximately half of the cells in the body are not even of human origin, believe it or not! We can all easily understand that our infantile body is completely and utterly different to our present-day form, so logically, our true identity must be something quite APART from it. Nothing, including one’s genetic code, remains constant from conception to death. The sense of self does not even make its appearance in our psyche until two or three years after conception. Therefore, a person is more accurately defined as a process (a verb), rather than an object (a noun). For the sake of philosophical IMPARTIALITY, it is germane to acknowledge the perspectives of other eminent pundits. E.g. In “Bhagavad-gītā”, one of the very greatest spiritual authorities the world has ever known, Lord Śri Krishna, uses the analogy of how the individual person (“ego”, in Latin, or “jīvātman”, in Sanskrit) travels through the various stages of life (that is, from childhood, to pubescent adulthood, to geriatric), with His description of the process of reincarnation, as conceived by the ancient seers (“ṛṣi” [rishi], in Sanskrit) of India (“Bhārata”, in Sanskrit). “...each person is destined to die once...” Anonymous (possibly Paul of Tarsus), Letter to the Hebrews, 9:27. N.B. Ironically, the author of the above letter was a close disciple (or at least a follower) of Lord Jesus of Nazareth, who, according to the New Testament portion of the Judeo-Christian holy book, raised his acquaintance, Lazarus, from the dead. Logically speaking, Lazarus must surely have died more than one time, as did the many dead persons who were supposedly raised from their graves at the crucifixion of Lord Jesus. Assuming that Paul was the author of the Letter to the Hebrews, he himself even raised a young man from the dead (although, in that case, the man, Eutychus, was dead for only a very short period of time, so it was likely that he was merely unconscious, rather than fully deceased). OBVIOUSLY, the writer means that, generally speaking, each individual person is destined for one life alone, as opposed to any alternative scenario such as reincarnation. Yet, as we now know, humans beings are not stable objects, but ever-mutating processes of mind and matter. “The entity that is supposed to be reincarnated in another body, does not even itself exist, except as a concept! How can a mere concept be reborn?” ************* “When you are dead, you will be back in the primordial state of rest, which existed before you were born; that stillness before all experience. It is only the false sense of a limited, separate 'me', that deprives life of its meaning and gives death an ominous significance, which it really does not have.” ************* “The fear of death, is actually a product of the desire to perpetuate one's identity. Were you not dead before you were born? Those who know Reality, know the falsehood of life and death.” ************* “What is born, must in due course, die. The objective body, will thereafter be dissolved and irrevocably annihilated. What was once a sentient being, will be destroyed, never to be reborn. But consciousness is not objective - not a thing at all. Therefore, consciousness is neither born nor dies, and certainly cannot be 'reborn'.” Ramesh Balsekar, Indian Spiritual Teacher. “Who are those persons who pass away leaving the ‘I’ intact? What exactly passes away leaving the ‘I’ intact? It is a body and its corollary, the world, that pass away. That is, particular sensations and perceptions disappear. That is all we can be sure of. However, sensations and perceptions are disappearing all the time. The ‘I’ is not a body. The ‘I’ is a thought that identifies awareness with a body. The ‘I’ passes away every time that thought ceases. All we know of death is that certain sensations and perceptions cease. There is no evidence that thinking and imagining cease at death. In fact, there are numerous reports of the mind surviving the death of the body (to go back to conventional language), but no reports of the mind disappearing along with the body. And this is exactly what happens when we fall asleep. The thinking, sensing and perceiving that we call the ‘waking state’ dissolve, but their energies leave a subtle residue which in turn arises as new thoughts, images, sensations and perceptions, which we call the ‘dream state’. In other words, a new body, mind and world appear in awareness in the dream state. When we wake in the morning, we don’t think ‘Oh, I reincarnated last night’, but in fact we did! That is, awareness took the shape of thinking, imagining, sensing and perceiving, and one of the forms that thinking took was the form of a particular thought that identifies itself, awareness, with one particular sensation called the body. That is reincarnation, to believe oneself to be a body and to seem, as a result, to live in a body. Reincarnation simply means to identify with a body. We do it numerous times every day, not just once a lifetime. And every time we disidentify with a particular body-mind we die as that apparent entity and realise ourself as awareness. This process continues in the waking state as well as the dream state, only this time we take it for real rather than as a dream. But during the dream itself, the appearance of a body and a world seemed equally real as the waking-state body and world. We have no way of knowing from within the waking state whether or not it is a dream, just as we have no way of knowing from within the dream itself whether or not the dream is real. However, we are not in the waking state any more than we are in a dream. We are awareness, and the waking state appears in us, as does the dream state. There is no difference, from the point of view of reality, if such can be said to have a point of view, between the waking and dream states. They are both appearances in awareness and made only out of awareness. In other words, neither incarnation nor reincarnation ever really happens. They just seem to happen. Therefore they never really cease to happen. They just seem to cease. The experience of love, peace or happiness is the experience of the cessation of the dream of incarnation.” Rupert Spira, English Spiritual Teacher.

@@SpiritualPsychotherapyServices I agree 100%.

I went to one of those and got nothing. Big waste of $!

When my son was 6, we were just driving down the freeway and he said "we used to play together but you looked different. You had brown hair and you were little like me." Well I was immediately shocked and told him to go on. He went on to describe my hair and a dress. I asked him if he remembered anything else and he said no. That was 38 years ago but I remember it perfectly well.

I am my mothers true mother

thank you

I've been having this hunch for years, @Apollyon 1975, thanks for saying it verbatim! (the tunnel=birthing canal, the welcoming light=the feeling of being unconditionally loved when in the womb, "download" of knowingness=sum total of genetic information stored in our species' DNA. These are broad strokes of ideas, but I'd gather you could reinterpret NDEs in that way, too - or somewhere along those lines. As for meeting deceased relatives or other significant figures from the personal domain or set of beliefs, I'd take it they get "tossed in" for an increased sense of being reassured. That's kind of "NDE hereticism", I'm aware. But why not allowing them in for contemplation?)

That's exactly what I've been saying for years, when I first read about NDEs I said to my then husband, it sounds like being born, a long dark tunnel, bright light and the people who are there to receive you are the ones who love you the most - so nice to hear that from someone else.

Mmmm except for the past life memories so so SO many have had about spending time in (what we call) "the afterlife", and choosing to be reincarnated, "signing" an incarnation contract and accepting a veil of forgetfulness when entering the womb of their mother. If the "light at the end of the tunnel" of death was you moving straight out of your next lifetime's mother's womb, none of these memories of being in the afterlife would exist.

Thank _you_ for being such an attentive and perceptive listener/visitor, @Ms. Hilda 1007! Here's to hoping that topics and experiences like this one will ever more often fall on the ears of people like your fine self and that there'll be a lot more open minded folks willing and daring enough to broaden their views. Thanks a bunch, made my day!

Over the last 2 years or so scientists have either been paid or threatened to lie to us!

Thank you, kindly, Cynthia! I appreciate your kind words!

Thorough!

I witnessed a miraculous healing while working as a systems analyst in a hospital. When I asked the nurse what we just saw, she said "It's that God stuff. We often see it. We don't question it."

@@nomebear Please tell us what it is you witnessed.

@@nomebear that’s GREAT to know! Thank you for your great comment!

(The reason I RARELY go to doctors and usually heal myself). How sad that his parents didn't take MORE of an interest! And take notes. REAL science minds would be curious. One of the greatest diseases in America is the lack of intellectual curiosity.

Pity then that the speaker does not present one shred of material evidence.

Well, at least you were not another Cleopatra or Mary Antoinette

LIKE YOU I HAVE SNIPPETS FROM PAST LIVES DOWNLOADED INTO MY SUBCONSCIOUS THAT CAME OUT IN MY CONSCIOUS THOUGHTS. I WAS BORN IN A U.S. ARMY HOSPITAL IN PARIS FRANCE, CIRCA 1959,TO A CAREER ARMY ENLISTED MAN.WE MOVED TO THE U.S.A.2 YEARS LATER,FORT BENNING GEORGIA. AS A CHILD I WAS ENAMORED WITH THE MILITARY ARMAMENTS OF WW2.WHILE ON LEAVE FROM MY USAF BASE IN GERMANY,WHILE TRAVELING IN THE SOUTH COAST OF FRANCE,DRIVING TO BIARRITZ, WITHOUT ANY MAPS,& A SENSE OF DEJA VU I KNEW HOW TO GET THERE.WE NEVER LEFT THE BASE WHILE STATIONED IN FRANCE. FAST FORWARD TO 1992,I TOOK A KUNDALINI YOGA WORKSHOP HOSTED BY A KUNDALINI MASTER FROM INDIA.HE PERFORMED SHAKTIPAT ON US,& I FELT NOTHING.HE REDIRECTED OUR MEDITATION FOCAL POINT TO THE POINT BETWEEN THE EYEBROWS. 3 NIGHTS LATER DURING MY NIGHTLY MEDITATION I HAD 2 KUNDALINI AWAKENING EXPERIENCE,S ON 2 CONSECUTIVE NIGHTS,1 OF WHICH I LATER LEARNED WAS CALLED SUCKING THE NECTAR-AMIRT. FAST FORWARD 2 WEEKS & I HAD THE MOST VIVID DREAM I EVER HAD.I WAS IN LEATHER ARMOR RIDING A HORSE IN A DESERT REGION,I COULD SMELL THE LEATHER & SWEAT FROM THE HORSE..I WAS IN FACT A ROMAN CENTURION DURING THE TIME OF THE JEWISH REVOLT, CIRCA 70 A.D. WE WERE INSTRUCTED TO CRUXIFY THESE REBELS ALONG THE ROAD.THAT NIGHT,I WAS DEEPLY TROUBLED BY THE SOUNDS OF THEIR SUFFERING.THE NEXT MORNING I ORDERED MY MEN TO TAKE THEM DOWN & EXECUTE THEM ON THE SPOT.MY SUPERIOR,S WERE NOT HAPPY WITH MY SOFT HEARTED STYLE IN DOING MY ROMAN DUTY.THEY ORCHESTRATED A KNIFE IN THE BACK,LITERALLY,ENDING THAT INCARNATION. MY LIFE BEFORE THIS CURRENT LIFE WAS AS A FRENCH SOLDIER IN WW2 FIGHTING OFF ANOTHER COUNTRY'S OCCUPATION LEADING TO MY DEATH. THIS WAS THE KARMIC BOOMERANG FOR BEING THAT ROMAN SOLDIER BENT ON TYRANNY OVER ANOTHER COUNTRIES POPULATION. I KNOW I SPENT LIFETIMES IN EGYPT & INDIA,AS I HAVE A COMFORT ZONE WITH THESE COUNTRIES,PROBABLY AS A PRIEST OR PRIESTESS. FINALLY,2 EXCELLENT UTUBE NAREATIVES ON THIS PHENOMENA IS:JAMES LENNINGER WHO WAS JAMES HOUSTON WW2 FIGHTER PILOT, AND JENNY COCKELL,S SHARED MEMORIES WITH HER FAMILY FROM HER PAST LIFE.

Wow I would love love love to go to that weekend.

I have a birthmark 🤔

I was shot in the back on D-Day. Have experienced that pain. Not fun. Birthmark is in the exact spot from where I was shot

Interesting...my mother and I both have the same birthmark, a splotch of red on the back of the neck just before the hairline. I wonder if that's why I am so afraid of public executions.

No offence meant, really, but that's an awful idea, you don't play with peoples' lives that way, I know people sentenced to death have been deemed unfit to live in society but they're not animals (animals do not deserve that treatment either) they are human beings (even if they are the worst of humans) your idea is vile and sadistic

Why? Most of them are murderers and serial killers.

Do you mean kill them and then resuscitate and interrogate them, hoping that their murderous character might be erased through being in the presence of the Divine?

That's the weird nature of people. Look at religious people and all the fantastical stories of old that they accept as factual, then turn around and be the biggest skeptics in their personal life.

Probably, but not *merely* astrologers.

Hitler is probably a KKK member.

Children are not born a blank slate, they have a personality at birth. My son was generous and giving his bottle to his twin sister before he drank milk. She is just the opposite.

Reincarnation has to do with souls. The point is that the soul can be many, many individuals over many lifetimes. Each time the soul is here to have different experiences in order to develop.

@@zelenplav1701 People often joke that kids have "been here before." When I look at my son over the years, he's a naive child but also has always had a strange wisdom about himself, that and a love for ladies and how to treat them 😂. He's always told me what I need to do with his mom, and he's never wrong.

You should read “Jesus’ Words Only” by Douglas J Del Tondo. This is not a new theory. It’s been suppressed.

As Mathew Franklin Whittier, I defended Paul. My study of the sociopathic personality in this lifetime convinced me that Paul's account of his conversion experience on the road to Damascus was a classic sociopathic-type lie. It is too grandiose, and too physical. Logically, if Paul didn't really have that experience, then he could not have been a saintly character, and there was no break with his former Pharisee beliefs. That accounts for him teaching contrary to reincarnation. My academic training is in counseling and psychology, so I came at the question from that perspective. It is actually a benefit not to be a Biblical scholar. The Bible is not the Word of God, though parts of it may be inspired by the Word of God. I am quite familiar with the real Word of God.--Stephen Sakellairos

I believe Jesus walked this earth, I believe he wanted to preach love and peace and I have great respect for him, I also believe that people exaggerated his life and embellished his story - like all people who tell tall tales of the dead, they twisted it to suit themselves - I'm not talking about the companions with lived with him,, I'm talking about all the liars who cashed in on his good works - I don't believe a word of the Bible after the story of creation.

Indeed. But He was speaking of God-Realization, which occurs after a great number of reincarnations. He had much bigger fish to fry than living forever in the astral realm (i.e., "heaven").

From my study of reincarnation I have found that a person has free will. You can choose to return to Earth or stay in the spirit world which is called by many people Heaven.

I feel the very same way, Marianatal. Absolutely no need to return here and if the afterlife is a thing, I hope I'm being spared another "trip" to Earth...

Why would you think this was the only planet habitable for life? 🤔 the universe is incomprehensibly huge

I thoroughly enjoyed this interview. I appreciate the skills of the interviewee who asked the questions that skeptics would have. I had been told my whole life that we only live once. Could never accept that. What would be the point? The soul’s desire is to expand and grow and the human experience provides the perfect venue. So glad I came across this channel. Thank you.

You may return to much happier life. Or to different time, as everything might be existing independently and at the same time.

Agreed. But anybody who taught resurrection created it as a substitute for reincarnation, including the Pharisees.

But if that were true, and people have had countless experiences as prior human beings, why do we find the average majority of humans making the same mistakes, over and over and over again....as if they have never experienced these things before? Why do children not remember the maturity of earlier experience? Why is it that the majority of humans fear the cessation of life, and have little to no power to envisage it? All these phenomena are perfectly explained by the fact that people have one, singular life and then die. However, they are direct contradictions to the idea of re-incarnation. Ockham's Razor easily applies here. Which do you think has the less assumptions and therefore is the better explanation?

Yes. I find that i'll be 100% with somebody, and then they'll pull something out that lowers their credibility. In this interview it was the claim that genetics isn't real. Why not just say it's accurate, but not complete. Like Newtonian physics.

Think school. I went through 12+ grades. Each year I had to attend a new grade each year after passing my final test...Imagine that.

Again n again till you realise you are Consciousness/ observer

And if you want to know how and why it's possible what Neville experienced and the laws and nature of it all then learn about magnetism, the dielectric and electromagnetic, Ken wheeler is the man for that , then get of the heliocentric horse shit impossiball spinning ball earth , it's geocentric , Every thing is biological , the live wire is electric yes , or it's alive , energy moves matter ,, the only living thing in the universe is electric , where you live is the reason you have paranormal, savants, esp , past life regression, ghost, and any others, dajavue, the reason ancients of old and today , regurgitate the saying , we're all one , near death experiences claim all knowing and time doesn't exist blah blah blahhh ,, if you want a in-depth look and evidence of what I'm about to present then it's not a problem ,, if you are affected by the Mandela effect it's cause of where you live , all data and information , worlds in worlds in worlds ,, all slightly dif to it's neighbour, now this place where you live is the macro , we are the micro , bit we are the macro to the micro in us ,, but as size goes up so does intelligence and complexity, and that's another reason you have the things like the 4 seasons , months and sun and moon on one hand ,, I got the whole world in your hand,, we are told that Jesus was made flesh and he still is , you, you are in your God, and we reside and are in the brain ,, on a neuron ,, specifically a bipolar neuron,, and we are energy light and simply decoding and creating our reality with our limited senses, Every animal differs , we see a slice of data and nothing more , our data is decoded, projected and sent as information to the next neuron that will have slightly diff experience as suttle as the tilda in kitt~katt or kitt katt , or total paradise or hell , do some work and you will find it's undeniable and provable , your very welcome , oh when you choose to bring things into your world, you don't, you as energy light simply merge into the neuron that entertains that state and leave this state neuron , nothing new under the sun , now we are all genies, cause the genie in us is you genius , when you die or experience the all knowing all one thing ,, you are simply we are of your self and your entire brain you were once dwelling in as one neuron ,, now your awake wally

Happy to point you where you can start your journey to the real truth not many know, maybe I shouldn't be casting pearls maybe I better not , not everyone is ready to see what they are not .

@@melanieturnbell6747 but it’s great to help n pointed out

Many civilianisation lived like Aztec n mayas , n who knows how many more roamed the planet

Everything it’s energy vibration n frequency, everything is possible

Do you really think we are capable of understanding how God creates souls? Some questions cannot be answered because the answers could never be understood by man at this time or maybe any time.

@@miriaml.150 And not by "Christians" - people forget - Jesus wasn't a Christian, Jesus was a Jew, his disciples were Jews, they were Jews who believed Jesus was the Messiah, therefore they were Messianic Jews - gentiles are "Christians" following the hijacking of Jesus teachings by the Romans who messed about with it to suit there own agenda - Christians don't follow Jesus, they follow an invented Roman religion claiming Jesus as their own, "Christianity" no more follows Jesus as it does Mohammed. 🤦🏼‍♀️

Most people don't, and would have to go to a past lives hypnosis session to pull it out. What's funny is my 8yr old son, out of nowhere about a week ago, told me that before he "learned what he learned" (Christianity), that he used to believe that he would die and be someone else in 1000 yrs, and that his soul was somewhere before he came into who he is now. I humored him and asked where he was, he said he used to remember but he's forgot it now (consistent with how they say kids forget around 5-7). He has no clue I've been looking into reincarnation on my own and I almost took it as a sign for myself.

Fair point, @Dean Wilson. You might find the interview with Prof. Dr. Tucker speaking to your reservations interesting as far as validation by way of eastern traditions goes. He addresses this and he has a fair share of strong cases in the U.S. providing more evidence in support of the veracity of the phenomenon. It's on this playlist along with Mrs. Carol Bowman's interview.

3/4 of the earth people have believed in reincarnation.

Written by jews who crucified Son of God? Very interesting.

ALL scripture is given by inspiration of GOD and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.2 Timothy 3:16

To die once to the ego self...the Bible is a mystical book! The symbols are Eastern & it has remnants of The Egyptian Book of the Dead in it’s mysticism! What is at the Core of most major religions was ONENESS! One with what some call God & One with each other & One with all things! The more one searches, truly the more one finds these truths!

And the only judgment is you judging the life you just lived!

@@Angel77_7 true, but there’s a difference between that which is inspired by the Divine & that which was warned about! Those who made a god in man‘s image and left out key information in scriptures! And he’s exactly right! There are remnants of reincarnation still left in scripture but if you ask a minister, they can’t explain it!

Hi Cynthia, the science is settled then ?

@Cynthia Ennis Your opinion. Yes. Humble? No. Not when you give zero rationale. There a a very large body of research on this subject whether you're aware of it or not.

As a person deeply interested in the UFO field, I understand that point of view. For some of us, we're waaay beyond that. But I'm new to the whole reincarnation thing, and I like the proof talk.

Yes, the hour us coming for hundreds of years. Maybe for us it's a long time but not for God. So maybe you're right, Jesus is coming in year 4500 and that's very soon. You're right then.

Yup. That's in the Bible.

This refers to real spiritual Life, not our phyiscal reflection of life. Jesus was the Son of God; the son of man is the ego, in my opinion, or can be taken as the physical incarnation. You're reciting texts, which have been modified, as "slogans," without deeply understanding their meaning.

No you're not, revelation states that only 144,000 will go to heaven, what makes you think you're one of them?

@@alisonholland7531 LOL funny how the gates of heaven are so narrow but I've yet to hear anyone say that their deceased loved ones didn't make it there.

Eyewitness accounts ?? The four Gospels are not even eyewitness writings These are stories that don't even agree.

In his defense, Clare: Mr. Sakellarios says from the beginning that he's not a deep student of Christianity, so if some details don't match with Christian scholars' consensus, go easy, if so inclined. If anyone is at fault, it's me for asking the question and taking him out of his field. But I didn't go there to put him on the spot, instead I meant to cover some general bases and establish some background in terms of traditional ideas and beliefs about reincarnation, which have been found in all major religions, including early Christianity from what I heared and read in preparing for this. This entire interview is not about attacking Christianity or any other spiritual tradition. Please see preceding interviews, in particular with Prof. Dr. Tucker, who carries on Dr. Stevenson's work and who has collected a fairly large body of evidence suggestive of reincarnation being a real phenomenon. From science to 3rd person accounts to personal experience - I think we have made a point in collecting data from all known sources when it comes to reincarnation. Let's try and remain open to the concept, shall we?

First of all nobody knowns who wrote the 4 gospels. read them again you will discover that the names given are not in the Greek writings. I agree the bible does not prove reincarnation.

What your credentials in this? I'll wait...

If that helps you to feel safer, that's fine, but if you look into it, you'll find I've done eleven years of rigorous research. Just because I can't get to my evidence in an hour-long interview, responding to the questions I am given, doesn't mean I don't have it.

I freely admitted that the history of Christianity was not my area of expertise. I was relying on the work of reincarnation writers Cranston and Head as regards Origen. Looking into it myself, afterwards, I disagree with them. Origen, in my opinion, was confused, but he does not seem to have been an advocate for reincarnation. However, while I do not claim expertise in the history of Christianity, I do have a background in mysticism. As for "nothing can historically support," you have Paul accusing Peter of being a hypocrite--but then, Jesus calls Peter a "rock," which is to say, a man of integrity. So either Paul was projecting, or else Jesus was a very poor judge of character. You choose.

What Stevenson believed in is irrelevant--what he studied and researched is what's important. Dr. Gary Schwartz researched mediumship. Any past-life therapist will tell you that most persons report mundane lifetimes. Please research your topic before dismissing anything out-of-hand.

When I did a past life regression I was a servant who spent a whole life serving a family, cleaning & doing housework. I didn't marry & I didn't have a life of my own. It was a boring, repressed life 😆