为啥不是 Ferrari ，昨天澳大利亚可是一二带回呀😊

@@user-dh6do4fz6p but I like the mclarens more than Ferrari 🤣

@@user-dh6do4fz6pno its like a FOTON cars.

nice taste​@@cabasadefogo9533

Yeah but its chineese. Like the british type 45 destroyers radar can track more than 4000 targets. The chineese destroyer is just a copy of anericas arleigh burke class

Weeak flooatiing tofu shiips by cpp 😂

The design is so u.s. copy

@@fierrymarkpanggo8162 All I know is that the drawings for the new generation of US destroyers look like the 055, so who is copying who exactly🤣

@@Itward985 delete your post plz. The more ignorant the enemy, the more advantageous it is for us.

There are Endians in the comments. Envy, jealousy and hatred overflowed my screen. Let’s build more toilets in the cow dung country.

wumao...poor wumao...

China has never fought a naval war, your statement is just stupid. How can you even make that claim??

Anyone that uses "Actually" that many times in a statement is Definitely a propagandist sponsored by china.

Settle down comrade. Western media is very honest about how capable the PLAN is. Glad you are actually proud of the actual improvement and actual level of modernity your cruiser, I mean destroyer actually possesses.

@@DaGoook l actually agree with you and this world actually genuinely needs more people actually like you in this world and you are so kind.

@@user-gu8qi4me8x开心就好

Not almost, and more like a heavy cruiser despite the lack of large caliber guns given their displacement and hard-hitting long range missile firepower

9

its a heavy cruiser and armed with hypersonic missile is deadly..

​@@IrishCarneyHigh calibre guns are old fashion.. The most important is the hypersonic missile they carried and can target point to point target.. These hypersonic missiles are deadly and can sink aircaft carrier.

now it's 10

JIAYOU CHUNG GUO 👌🇨🇳✊🇨🇳🥰💚

Which language you use here?????????​@@liaojohnweechun7454

yup, it belongs to the brothel...lmao

It's warship not boat my friend

What channel is neutral? The westerner channel is much biased towards USA and her allies.

Wikipedia just lacks maintainace funding

Why is it "not that neutral"? He provides accurate information and sticks to the facts, instead of making sensational comments.

​@@zix_zix_zix I agree when it comes to the topic of Chinese things, which is why I stick around. However when the rare moment comes along where he offers his opinion on American programs like the Ford class and the F-35, his commentary is very sensational and indistinguishable from low-info Russian propaganda

@zix_zix_zix he's portraying accurate information, but sometimes he's unnecessary, prolonged rants about some things, which is okay since he's not making things up, just overstating some things. It doesn't happen often and hasn't happened recently, though, and it's the only small point of criticism I have. But I wouldn't have subscribed for like 2 years if that would be a major issue.

因为还有两艘航母正在建造中，所以055热度少一点😂现在的热度在：这两艘正在建造的航母到底是不是核动力航母

今天第 10 艘已经下水了

Zumwalt?

before you speak, check your iq.

Classic American when somebody says something you don't agree with you attack their character or something about them ​@@fhetfet6402

It's possible to have spacious living quarters if it was implemented into the design, Zumwalt has similar design/layout as well. I think the ones shown in this videos are SNCO or JO quarters.

Yup. It’s pretty much a Cruiser. I hope once the entire line of these ships are built (16 in total) the PLAN will reclassify them as Cruisers. I think they classify them as destroyers now because they dont want to scare Western imperialists 😂

⁠@@amunra5330no, it’s because cruiser isn’t a classification in their system, just like how many European countries don’t have destroyers in theirs. Everything is a frigate.

what about those japanese helicopter 'destroyers' that can fly F35B??

It's a destroyer, not a cruiser, in the same way that China is a developing economy, not a developed one.

Well that's how NATO classifies them, although it's not really that simple. The Chinese don't really use the Type 055 for the sorts of C&C roles that define a cruiser in the NATO classification, and it's development is much more a continuation of the Type 052 series of destroyers rather than a fundamentally different warship (compared to, say, the Ticonderoga and Arleigh Burke). The PLAN has never really had cruisers and they don't have much need for the classification, whereas it is very convenient for the Americans to call it a cruiser because it makes the PLAN sound much more threatening and thus justifies more spending. In particular it is an effort to revive the cancelled CG(X) project. It is worth noting that the CG(X) project was cancelled because they decided the task could be completed by the DDG(X) instead. So even in the United States, pretty much the last holdout of the antiquated "cruiser" term, the ship type is being phased out. The reality is that there aren't going to be any cruisers (except for maybe a couple of relics) in a decade or two.

Jealous of what may i ask??? U people forget all of those Chinese designs even their aircraft were taken from the west mostly from the US right??? So I don't know what is there to be jealous about, and yet still you're here watching the proganda

@@omarionbayley9721 Complete rubbish. You don't know what the fuck you're talking. You're spouting typical Western propaganda bullshit.

​@@omarionbayley9721yeah so what.

​@@omarionbayley9721😂那你们怎么造不出来？又是经典的，我们偷了你们没有的东西😂

@@hbc511 there is nothing to be jealous about

That would be implying the Soviet Navy was actually a threat at some point. The actual threat came from the hundreds of Tu-22M bombers built towards the end of the Cold War. Soviet doctrine would throw 100 of them at a single carrier group.

Polish submarines?

Old Chinese combat ships have windows for...snippers.

@@caliman8006 you mean machine guns? I doubt they would even *have* sniper rifles on the ship?

China spans 3 timezones in geography but uses only one timezone for everything, so if I had to guess, I'd say it uses the same standard timezone

T 45 is slightly more advanced.

对对对 你说的都对@@chester1234ification

All sunk in a simulation by the Type 055 and Type 052D ! ...LoL kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eM6IpLtn28_bm4E.html

@@chester1234ificationI’ll have to disagree. In general I think the 055 is about a class higher than the 45 in almost all areas except for CIC. In terms of radar capabilities, the variety of lethal weaponry in the vls, the amount of power it generates, and it’s electronic warfare capabilities, in other words in every aspect that makes a modern warship dangerous, the 055 has a significant edge over the 45.

@@chester1234ificationI personally think the newest batch of 052DG destroyers is a more equal match for the 45.

Interesting question. I've done some reading on Chinese assessment of the HIMAR and how they plan to counter it. Seems like a good video topic, so I'll address this in a video if that's OK

@@EurasiaNaval I look forward to it.

apparently the PRSM is going to be a non-hypersonic, non-stealth antiship ballistic missile which basically means its going to be fairly easy to shoot down. Its only saving grace would be that it can be fired in large volleys, but somehow I doubt the US can afford to lob large volleys of them at chinese warships over and over.

@@hughmungus2760 All ballistic missiles reach hypersonic velocities in the terminal phase, it's called gravity. The question is whether or not they are maneuverable in this phase. I have no doubt that Chinese hypersonic missiles in service today are superior to the PrSM 1 in every way, but the game is not one of hypersonic missiles fighting outer hypersonic missiles. American PrSMs could be just as devastating to Chinese ships as DF-17s are to American ships. The Americans would just need to fire more of them, which is fine, since they're cheaper.

@@theredbar-cross8515 depends, some shorter range ballistic missiles don't actually reach mach 5. it can maybe be compared with the DF21d, except it doesn't have 1500km of range which is what makes it really effective. Also the PRSM has a warhead of under 100kg, whereas a chinese df21d has a warhead of well over 500kg The DF17 is in a completely different league as the PRSM, its a hypersonic glider which means it spends the majority of its flight in an aerodynamic profile and can perform evasive manoeuvres that make it extremely difficult to intercept at range.

I think he mentioned he is taiwnese

@cariopuppetmaster yeh I have no doubt but he definitely has a bit of a "twang" to his accent and I suspect it's kiwi. Regardless awesome content.

​@@gtempo4673 he's a Taiwanese American...

@paulantony4598 true that but his English has soo many kiwi signatures in it, I wonder if he has been hanging around kiwis. Regardless top notch dude. Top notch content.

Outperforms kirov class in all aspects

基洛夫是五十年前的老古董，它不属于这个时代

别让他们知道太多

A single one no, the YJ21s it uses are good but rather inaccurate for modern missiles, adding to that with the us testing there new SM missiles it will even further decrease the chance of a hit meaning a full strike group would be able to out launch a single type55. Best way for such a attack to succeed would be by having multiple plus type 052s to provide additional threats

如果卫星制导精度足够，理论上是可行的

@@lspcnb3747 是的，我承认它非常令人印象深刻，如果它有效，它将几乎势不可挡，但以那些针对计算机的速度还无法工作

@@Spooky_918 YJ21的打击距离远，多打几轮是完全有可能的，055的作战半径在1500公里

u donno thay one of this destroyer kept US 7th fleet at bay for 20 days. Locking its VLS. USS carl vinson was there. only one of this destroyer back in jan this year. please find out the story. its really powerful. one of this can handle entire carrier battle group​@@Spooky_918

扬眉吐气，兄弟

哈哈哈哈，你真是个小丑🤡

Zumwalt has more tonnage, but is unreliable and very expensive

Zumwalt doesn't know what it has to be..

早有消息了，已有的055a主炮是双路供弹，今年下海的055b主炮要用电磁炮，整个船要用全点

According to domestic media reports, research and development began in 2023. The model seems to be called 055A, with a displacement of over 15000 tons, and the weapon appears to be an electromagnetic cannon. I'm not sure

Nah mate

Yes, I think the 130mm gun is there for fire support on land targets after the PLA achieve air&sea superiority. I saw some posts say it can provide the same fire power as a artillery battalion.

Don’t be surprised that ships were in visual range when hostilities break out.

This ship is stealth........for thousands of years, traditional Chinese combat techniques have been based on large army models, now they have leading global technology. but don’t forget that the PLA is the world’s largest and most powerful guerrilla group with outstanding records.

YJ21 has a range of more than 2,000 kilometers, and can break through the black barrier and change the orbit of supersonic flight communication.

通用在於彈性 應變 ，專用除B格 還有什麼優勢？

I doubt it! China now reminds me of that scene from “Back to the future” when Doc in the 50s was blaming problems with the DeLorean on “Japanese microchips” until 80s Marty put him right. China has now caught and surpassed everybody now. I think they will have a “game changing” military technology soon , I hear rumours of plasma stealth 😉

*more, not moar

That copy is literally twice as powerful as the Goalkeeper though. It has 11 barrels compared to the Goalkeeper's 7, 11k rpm compared to 4.2k rpm & basically twice the range..

@@paulantony4598But it still is: a copy.

Who is saying their propaganda isn’t public? 😂

​@@christophervaughan2637 yes as public as USA propagandas

@@christophervaughan2637 you

@@erwinlee2842 yes both sides are creating propaganda so please don’t speak as if China is better than anyone else

@@christophervaughan2637 China isnt worse than US, so sod off

believe me you don't want to know, these ships are equipped with YJ-21 hypersonic missiles, with 112 VLS cells, this ship is heavily armed and much more than Flight III Arleigh Burke, no doubt that both are advanced in tech but if the two enemies are nearly the same tech level then if you are 1 step ahead of me that doesn't mean you are better than me.