Oh thank god! For a second there I was worried you were done with Hollow Knight!

I was worried you were done with hollow knight, glad I saw this comment.

I was hoping you'd be playing this game someday after Hollow knight, what a wonderful surprise 😁

Playing along with u homie lesgetit! PS re: frame stutter I've noticed on my nvidia gpu/gsync on that without vsync, the frame pacing suffers considerably. Enable in-game vsync to reduce frametime by 10ms and improve stability. Additional settings to address stutter - in nvidia control panel > manage 3d settings > program settings > oride.exe (may have to add) > - Low latency mode : off - Power Management Mode: Optimal or Prefer Max Performance - Triple Buffering: On - VR Pre-rendered frames: 2 or 3 Click Apply at bottom > hopefully profit! Also try disable game mode AND hardware accelerated GPU scheduling in windows settings (game mode settings and graphics settings respectively).

The sequal to Hollow Knight, which is called Hollow Knight: Silksong is gonna be released within the next 11 months. Are you gonna play it when it releases? You play as Hornet and it looks like it'll be even more fleshed out than Hollow Knight.

we need outer wilds next 😍

And let me just add that you are THE BEST playthrough-er on KZfaq that I’ve watched. You have none of the arrogance that many of the other gamers have, and watching you experience genuine joy, rage, and excitement as you play is a total pleasure. And I’m sorry if I made you feel bad about Gathering Swarm …

Hk didn't influence will of the wisps that much, the charm system was in the works (conceptually) during the development of blind forest. It just didn't really work for that game so they shelved it until the sequel. The main inspiration for the charms is actually from paper mario, which hk also got inspiration from i believe. The other area people say it took inspiration from is deepnest with mouldwood depths, i also disagree on this front. Not only are darkness levels a pretty general concept (hk wasn't the first to do this) i'd also say it's quite different. Deepnest's darkness doesn't kill you, it just makes you not see anything (which most likely kills you). In ori it outright kills you so you follow the little lights until you get the power to (temporarely as it costs mana) light up the area yourself. Once you've beaten the boss the area isn't shrouded in darkness anymore. As for both being insect themed, that's a coincedence as it fits differently in the narative for both games, but both work very well. It could be inspired but it's different enough in my opinion to be considered a different and seperate take on a darkness level. As for who did it better that's up to personal opinion but to me mouldwood depths was vastly superior. Boss fights are also pretty different between both games as well as being a common concept in (2D) games so no inspiration drawn there. The only aspect i'd say that did inspire WotW is the purchasable maps, but again this works differently in both games. To conclude i'm not saying that wotw didn't take inspiration from HK but i think people are overexagerating when they say that, especially those annoying fanboys that say it copied HK (they say that about so many games). If in silksong there's chase sequences or time trails i wouldn't say HK copied or was inspired by ori either, it's just two games taking concepts and executing it very well. The fans need to stop accusing other games of copying them, only in extreme cases like gleamlight you could say that it ripped off hk. Anyways i like Hk and i LOVE ori so seeing ori get bashed by hk fans all the time does make me kinda angry. Blind forest was first and wotw had many concepts in the works around 2016.

angry birds?

too bad it only has few ost

And Ori is a million times easier and simpler lol. It's a fun little game though

The first Ori has much more simplified combat, as you basically attack with those little homing strikes. The second game has a different (and more traditional) approach to combat, that's why I enjoyed the second one much more

@@brenosulzbacher I agree Will of the Wisps was much better.

Also playing ori bf rn... Beautiful and awesome. Movement is perfect. Will also play WoW as combat looks way better.

Yeah movement is where Ori really nails it. I've played only a few games that were as satisfying to control as Ori

On point 3, while the night the tree called for Ori was a critical moment, that was the tree calling for its lost child, not a final moment - or it wouldn't have been had it not been for the owl who, for reasons, got angry and plucked the light of the spirit tree, which is what doomed the forest - without Sein, the tree could no longer serve the forest and decay set in (it might have been in a slow decline before that - it's not entirely clear). Once Sein, the eyes of the forest, was cast out, the Blind Forest decayed to the current state. With Naru's death, Ori set out, collapsed and the tree used the remnants of its power to revive Ori in hopes that Ori could restore Sein and so the forest. It's the loss of Sein that was the disaster, not the loss of Ori.

This is my favourite game series :D The story has stuff that can be spoiled, so be careful with comments

It's on Xbox, pc and switch but not Playstation. Maybe that's why.

also.... the music.

I always wanted to play these games but unfortunately I only own a PlayStation.

I think it's because there both metroidvanias

@@appleseed2976 i mean a game genre is pretty broad. That's like saying that CSGO is like overwatch, or that skyrim is like the witcher.

@Arte Floe The first Ori definitely has a feeling or a vibe that the sequel has less because they innovated. Interesting paradox, sort of?

@@lorettabes4553 they did even a better map design but they listen too much to people who say the platforming was tricky and difficult and they lower the platforming difficulty which I didnt like at sll still the game is better thsn BF but not for so much.