A6500 - Massive 500-1000mm Lens - It's 80 Bucks, Does it Suck?

  Рет қаралды 2,869,909

Christopher Burress

Christopher Burress

7 жыл бұрын

Check out my latest video : • Zhiyun Smooth Q - Does...
Huge lens: amzn.to/2mVefdP
tiny lens: amzn.to/2nc9skr
Sony a6500: amzn.to/2nisAxX
Lens used in this video: amzn.to/2nilwBx
Tripod: amzn.to/2niuQ8q
Bendy Tripod:amzn.to/2ob7Xnw

Пікірлер: 2 700
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 7 жыл бұрын
TO ANSWER IF IT SUCKS OR NOT: It doesn't suck for the price. I was impressed with the sharpness that could be achieved. New $87 link: amzn.to/2p3Sbgn (the last one went up to $120)
@BryonBlack1
@BryonBlack1 7 жыл бұрын
Christopher Burress it looks pretty decent at 500mm (when watching on my phone, anyway). But it's pretty atrocious at 1000. The only use at 1000mm would be for surveillance of some sort. Thanks for the video! Definitely an interesting lens.
@TheBeteljuice
@TheBeteljuice 7 жыл бұрын
It does look atrocious at 1000mm because of the heat-shimmer in the atmosphere. a still image would remove that element. I'm not defending the lens, just adding some insight.
@sweetguy19762
@sweetguy19762 7 жыл бұрын
Why is the price so cheap on this lense, what is the catch?
@TheChameleon2008
@TheChameleon2008 7 жыл бұрын
The catch is that its made from cheap plastic and elements but for sucvh a price you really cant bitch.
@jramadora7081
@jramadora7081 7 жыл бұрын
Owen Chase science channel probably because its aperture starts at F8
@Daniel_V_
@Daniel_V_ 7 жыл бұрын
Finally found a good vlogging lens. Thanks
@saifa4537
@saifa4537 7 жыл бұрын
Varga Dániel you happen to be a vlogging giraffe?
@gavincrowley562
@gavincrowley562 7 жыл бұрын
Varga Dániel 35 foot monopod? That's the minimum focus distance
@NewStuffTV1
@NewStuffTV1 7 жыл бұрын
Varga Dániel 😂🤣😂🤳
@NewStuffTV1
@NewStuffTV1 7 жыл бұрын
😂🤣😂🤳
@AbeZchannel
@AbeZchannel 7 жыл бұрын
who said he was vlogging himself? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
@KyleShoeBoi
@KyleShoeBoi 5 жыл бұрын
I think your lens has a camera attached to it..
@allex_raresh3094
@allex_raresh3094 4 жыл бұрын
Have*
@indianbri
@indianbri 4 жыл бұрын
Allex_Raresh no it’s has
@indianbri
@indianbri 4 жыл бұрын
Allex_Raresh 🤦‍♂️ nice try
@kevingumfory
@kevingumfory 4 жыл бұрын
Lol. Well played !
@KornerCommand
@KornerCommand 4 жыл бұрын
Allex_Raresh has*
@danieldougan269
@danieldougan269 4 жыл бұрын
The perfect portrait lens for COVID-19 social distancing!
@ishanagarwalphotography
@ishanagarwalphotography 4 жыл бұрын
Hehehe yes
@aanandkulkarni8728
@aanandkulkarni8728 4 жыл бұрын
😜😜😜😜
@JoshxIZ
@JoshxIZ 3 жыл бұрын
hahahaahhahahhaahahahahah -_-
@danieldougan269
@danieldougan269 3 жыл бұрын
@@andrew_koala2974 Or, you know, people who believe in science and don't want to die in a pandemic.
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 3 жыл бұрын
I need to block him he is doing a great job of making himself look like an ass here.
@jimmyhidalgo2680
@jimmyhidalgo2680 5 жыл бұрын
Looks like i dont even have to show up to the photo location now
@GloryStoryCz
@GloryStoryCz 4 жыл бұрын
:D
@Boldness-and-Virtue
@Boldness-and-Virtue 3 жыл бұрын
Lol!!! 😂
@wackerr
@wackerr 7 жыл бұрын
lol "whoa there's a sniper on the roof"
@JHA854
@JHA854 7 жыл бұрын
wackerr seriously, got to be careful with a lens like that haha
@NeilSahay
@NeilSahay 7 жыл бұрын
wackerr that's what I was thinking the whole time. As a brown person, I feel like it would be wise for me to keep away from this lens.
@emanuelgodfried7559
@emanuelgodfried7559 7 жыл бұрын
wackerr of when you really badly need tot spy on someone
@LJS01
@LJS01 7 жыл бұрын
@ wackerr, lol, "Let's see, over here we have a police station, then a nuclear power plant, over there is the Governors mansion, a church and lastly my ex-wife walking the dog" yeah sounds legit :-D
@RagicalPlays
@RagicalPlays 7 жыл бұрын
Haha you should check out the "Novoflex Noflexar 400mm/f5.6, 600mm/f8 pistol grip" or the more professional grade and vintage TAIR-3S Photosniper
@Bleeblo21
@Bleeblo21 7 жыл бұрын
Don't use youtubes stabilization when posting. It makes the video look like jello
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 7 жыл бұрын
Lascactus Smith I accidentally applied rolling shutter correction to everything, not just the footage that needed it.
@Bleeblo21
@Bleeblo21 7 жыл бұрын
Good video overall though. Keep it up
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 7 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@jonodubs
@jonodubs 7 жыл бұрын
that jello is from the camera, the 6500 has a known crazy rolling shutter.
@rehanhaque
@rehanhaque 7 жыл бұрын
JONODUBS the a6500 is no where near that. In video can see the jello on the text overlay too which suggests it happened post upload to KZfaq.
@MonsterKz69
@MonsterKz69 6 жыл бұрын
going on a roof with a Sniper's Optic looking lens on a tripod, good idea xD
@westyavro
@westyavro 4 жыл бұрын
Actually it would be safe in every country but the united states. To many gun crazy people there.
@kenrussell1093
@kenrussell1093 4 жыл бұрын
I thought the same thing, might look a bit suspicious😏
@pe1etr
@pe1etr 4 жыл бұрын
He could get some great shots of President Trump's motorcade.
@f.d.6667
@f.d.6667 4 жыл бұрын
Depends on your location. Remember the Aqua Teen Hunger Force "viral" prank? Black box with wires dangling from it attached to a bridge... Boston: under lock-down - same thing in SF nobody gives a shit.
@camhoc2462
@camhoc2462 4 жыл бұрын
Only an idiot would see that and think it’s gun related, looks just like a scope there’s not even a gun under it.
@ExotiqBeautii
@ExotiqBeautii 5 жыл бұрын
*Perfect! I can secretly film my crush without him calling the cops now. I hate it when he pranks me like that smh. We're actually married; he just doesn't know it yet! Wish me luck guys!*
@h.ar.2937
@h.ar.2937 5 жыл бұрын
But when I make the same comment on Facebook, the " *police* " have to get 'involved'.... Double standards.
@andrewyork3869
@andrewyork3869 5 жыл бұрын
I was thinking about how perfect this would be for observing my love from beyond the restraining order!!
@jimmyhidalgo2680
@jimmyhidalgo2680 5 жыл бұрын
@Andrew York @Vani Jay you’re creepy
@andrewyork3869
@andrewyork3869 5 жыл бұрын
@@jimmyhidalgo2680 woosh
@Pilzi02
@Pilzi02 5 жыл бұрын
@@jimmyhidalgo2680 Oh you don't get the joke don't ya. People like you are just stupit. I only open those comments to see people like you writing dumbshit :D
@lifevstravel1849
@lifevstravel1849 7 жыл бұрын
dang. that turned out way better than I would have thought.
@AgriVideos1
@AgriVideos1 7 жыл бұрын
When the first sample picture of his wife came up I literally said wow, pretty impressive sharpness. I suppose considering my expectations were very low.
@JonnyBlueChair
@JonnyBlueChair 7 жыл бұрын
AgriVideos1 same here!
@TheDemockery
@TheDemockery 6 жыл бұрын
Marcus Nixon same here. Quite surprising.
@kaboom555
@kaboom555 5 жыл бұрын
Heck even with low expectations that was INCREDIBLY impressive. The city shots were less impressive but that's mainly due to atmospheric effects, the actual air puts a limit on the sharpness that can be achieved, but the portraits literally blew me away. I was in no way expecting to be able to discern individual hairs, there's very little or no chromatic aberration at all... Unbelievable deal for certain situations.
@DemiaAbzorTime
@DemiaAbzorTime 4 жыл бұрын
Finally some good lens for selfie’s
@JatinSharma-wb8nq
@JatinSharma-wb8nq 4 жыл бұрын
Gud luck finding a million mm selfie stick 😂😂😜
@PhilJonesIII
@PhilJonesIII 4 жыл бұрын
I take it your shirt-sleeves are always too short?
@thomasrush2095
@thomasrush2095 4 жыл бұрын
Are you taking those selfies with a drone that's 10000 feet in the air?
@jeepjoseph9036
@jeepjoseph9036 4 жыл бұрын
If you are on two continents at once
@MrPriceMonroe
@MrPriceMonroe 4 жыл бұрын
Set that timer to 30 minutes and run.
@Aquatography
@Aquatography 5 жыл бұрын
Actually at 500mm it didn't look to bad at all. 1000 was pushing it; though I think the heat in air had a huge part to play. It reminded me of what its like to look at the moon through a large dobsonian telescope, where the atmosphere creates a moving fluid like distortion.
@AtlantaTerry
@AtlantaTerry 4 жыл бұрын
I said the same thing. Shoot tests like that early in the morning just after sunrise when the heat waves won't be present.
@asiastreets4032
@asiastreets4032 3 жыл бұрын
Better use it in 4/3 camera to get 2x, or nikon j5
@edwardreverseproductions
@edwardreverseproductions 2 жыл бұрын
I think,this specifically is just the rolling shutter of the a6300
@kmoecub
@kmoecub 3 ай бұрын
That's going to happen with any lens when there is a large heat gradient in the atmosphere. I don't generally take any long-distance photos, or use any telescope before allowing the optic to reach atmospheric temperature for just that reason. A closed lens takes longer to reach equilibrium than an open optic (such as a reflector telescope) does.
@TheBobhyp
@TheBobhyp 3 жыл бұрын
For the price, that's a pretty good lens! I had been using a Schmidt cassegrain 500mm lens on a Nikon Ftn some time ago, and it was just about as good as the lens you used in this video at 500mm. The 2X magnification reduces the quality of the photos. The interesting thing about these long lenses is that in hot weather, the heat distortion becomes very obvious. Very well presented, and a pretty good deal for $81!!
@b3naqua
@b3naqua 7 жыл бұрын
I wish that lens was somehow even bigger
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 7 жыл бұрын
Lol
@NotMyNameHaHaHa
@NotMyNameHaHaHa 7 жыл бұрын
Meyer Optik 500mm Medium format lens. Affordable and gigantic.
@GoatBarn
@GoatBarn 7 жыл бұрын
Largest refracting (read "telephoto")lens in the world is Yerkes Observatory telescope (40") with a focal length of 19,400 mm (63.64829 ft)! The format is 8"x10" so the DX "equivalent " would be about...29,000mm?? Long...
@b3naqua
@b3naqua 7 жыл бұрын
Goat haha geeeez that's insane!!
@b3naqua
@b3naqua 7 жыл бұрын
Nick Finley Music lol 500mm 😱😱😱 aka basically a telescope!
@RyoHazuki224
@RyoHazuki224 7 жыл бұрын
Crazy. On that close-up shot of the AT&T logo, you can tell the faint markings of an older logo that used to be there next to it! lol
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 7 жыл бұрын
Oh yeah, you can!
@RyoHazuki224
@RyoHazuki224 7 жыл бұрын
They probably had the old logo there before but off to the left and probably had the actual words AT&T next to that!
@nativetexan5457
@nativetexan5457 7 жыл бұрын
Are you sure that's the old logo marks? The marks disappear a few seconds later. I thought it was an artifact of the lens somehow.
@SianaGearz
@SianaGearz 6 жыл бұрын
Native Texan, no, there's a very clear super thin upper left circular arc section outline to the left of the round AT&T logo carved into the concrete and a diffuse unevenly darkened patch of concrete, like moisture damage, in the lower part of the same circle and they certainly don't disappear. The circle is about the same size as the logo too. It looks like they had the logo moved to the right. Similarly, dark spots to the right of the current logo spell "&T".
@nativetexan5457
@nativetexan5457 6 жыл бұрын
I stand corrected. In my honest defense...i wasn't lying. When I first posted that reply, I watched multiple times to be sure. I swear to god it disappeared a few seconds later. 110% positive. I just rewatched all the scenes with that building, nothing. Didn't disappear. I'm going to chalk it up to monitor issues I guess. I dunno. But it DID disappear a few seconds later every time originally. *shrugs*
@jokerperson1572
@jokerperson1572 6 жыл бұрын
When you’re really shy but still want to get footage
@Noealz
@Noealz 5 жыл бұрын
Kinda surprised how well it actually came out. I just recently ordered another more expensive lens but kinda regret not watching this one first lol
@doplinger1
@doplinger1 7 жыл бұрын
That's actually way sharper than would have expected. The vet seen a few reviews for these kinds of lenses and none of them looked that good.
@davefreeman9847
@davefreeman9847 7 жыл бұрын
Ideal for horizon shots for Flat Earth research
@MrSpaceRatt
@MrSpaceRatt 6 жыл бұрын
Zippy, we need folks like Dave. Makes the normal people seem intelligent.
@MrSpaceRatt
@MrSpaceRatt 6 жыл бұрын
I bet it can be used to prove you have a flat head
@mysko417
@mysko417 6 жыл бұрын
It's obviously banter, calm down guys.
@Scientists_dont_lie
@Scientists_dont_lie 5 жыл бұрын
Get the P1000
@richardwilliamjohnson8566
@richardwilliamjohnson8566 5 жыл бұрын
What you see through the lens is a government conspiracy though
@mikejensen9120
@mikejensen9120 5 жыл бұрын
It's 80 bucks, it works for that price.
@maddercat
@maddercat 5 жыл бұрын
Various companies have been selling this same lens for probably at least 20-30 years. I have one from the 90's and used it for several shoots and always impressed by the lens for the price I bought it for like 25 years ago it more than paid for itself probably 100 times over. I wish all lenses were like this one.
@ronspi
@ronspi 7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video. One of the things that never fails to disappoint is: When someone tests a zoom lens, they never tell us how far the camera is from the subject. Seeing 500mm and 1,000mm means nothing to the viewer because we can't tell how far you were from the AT&T sign to appreciate how clear it looks at 1,000mm.... If you test zoom lenses, it would be greatly appreciated if you could add the distance between you and the object. Thanks again for discovering unique items for the Sony A6x00.
@KentuckyRanger
@KentuckyRanger 7 жыл бұрын
As a professional photographer, I was expecting horrid things, LOL! The big drawback is starting at an f/8, that's where more expensive lenses exceed. But other than that, it was really impressive! I figured barrel distortion, chromatic aberration, and vignetting would be really bad. But for an $80 zoom lens, this really surprised me! I have a 500mm lens that cost me $500+, and while I can see the limitations of this lens, it wasn't a $500 Olympus lens, LOL! The one that really impresses me is the lack of barrel distortion. I figured the 1,000mm views would really show this flaw, but the lens did very well! If you didn't tell a professional photographer, they would be hard pressed to judge this lens badly. Although chromatic aberration is present, it isn't that bad. In fact, most wouldn't even notice it. And vignetting is almost non-present! One has to look at the really bright scenes to see it, and only when one looks close can it be noticed. This lens really blew me away! And I'm hard to please, LOL! P.S. The CCD needs cleaning. Telephoto lenses really bring out the flaws in a CCD's cleanliness, LOL!
@greenidgejonathan07
@greenidgejonathan07 5 жыл бұрын
I think I'll buy it thanks to your mini professional review. It should help me out. Thanks LOL!
@ast5515
@ast5515 5 жыл бұрын
Starting at F8 isn't all the best but most kit lens go to F5-F8 at full zoom so you are still better off with this.
@mikehaines1712
@mikehaines1712 5 жыл бұрын
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL SO HARD
@yassineoutoloub3886
@yassineoutoloub3886 5 жыл бұрын
Kentucky Ranger LOL!
@mrEbraheem
@mrEbraheem 5 жыл бұрын
Shut up.
@chileheadcraig
@chileheadcraig 6 жыл бұрын
Nice review! Glad Grace Church downtown made an appearance, I go to TR campus now. Crazy how much it pulled in the towers on Paris Mtn!
@ginjeff
@ginjeff 4 жыл бұрын
Spiratone was selling these back in the 60s and 70s. I had a 400mm for my Miranda. They are called "pre-set" aperture where you have to use the second ring to actually stop down. When you remember. And the T mount lives on!
@azeronephoto8755
@azeronephoto8755 7 жыл бұрын
Pretty dang good at 80 bux for cheapoin around town! Nice video.
@amaranthnath8310
@amaranthnath8310 5 жыл бұрын
Azerone Photo
@bloop4058
@bloop4058 5 жыл бұрын
Azerone Phot
@hashbrownz1999
@hashbrownz1999 7 жыл бұрын
People bash cheap lenses, But if you compare a $100 lens to a $1500 lens, you'll see minor improvements all across the board. at the cost of another fourteen lens's. it's just not worth it unless you're a full time professional.
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 7 жыл бұрын
+Probably Not A Chicken there we go, some common sense! Some comments here bashing it aren't considering the fact that this is a 500mm lens, and I would NEVER spend $2k+ on a lens that would be this specific of a use case. So no matter how bad the $100 version is, it's better than any alternative on my radar.
@ArthurEmbleton
@ArthurEmbleton 5 жыл бұрын
Why would I want 15 lenses? I have three and that works for me.
@juanpena5797
@juanpena5797 5 жыл бұрын
@@ArthurEmbleton and you have your reasons for that just like he has his reasons for a 100dollar glass. The only question should be what do your pictures look like and what type of work do you do?
@juanpena5797
@juanpena5797 5 жыл бұрын
@B Roli well that 400 becomes 520mm on a 1D body or a 640 on a crop sensor. There you go...😎
@gunfighterzero
@gunfighterzero 5 жыл бұрын
@@juanpena5797 1d? you mean a full frame camera? no it stays at 400mm
@mark33328
@mark33328 5 жыл бұрын
at 500mm is was pretty good, the 2x converter ruined it.
@terriplays1726
@terriplays1726 5 жыл бұрын
That is also my take-away. You could probably the same result as with the teleconverter just by cropping.
@smashtime1904
@smashtime1904 5 жыл бұрын
with an a7RII I'd think it'd be superb for crop in or 2x crop with stabilized m43 sensor...
@TheJudge064
@TheJudge064 5 жыл бұрын
@@smashtime1904 I don't think it'll resolve enough for there to be a difference between teleconverter and the m43
@padkirsch
@padkirsch 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah I agree. Personally I don't think I've ever seen a 2X converter that worked good. If you can find the exception, please let me know if you know of a 2x converter that works amazingly. 💟✅👍
@AtlantaTerry
@AtlantaTerry 4 жыл бұрын
@@padkirsch dusting off my memory banks... didn't Nikon make a Nikkor 2X Teleconverter at one time?
@tjoelfoster
@tjoelfoster 5 жыл бұрын
Good video. Getting back into the hobby after a 25 year absence. Fighting GAS already. Had to subscribe after seeing the parking garage and downtown you went to. Good to find a local on here. Thanks.
@Ck87JF
@Ck87JF 4 жыл бұрын
Gas? I'm guessing something to do with apathy?
@paulsheridan424
@paulsheridan424 3 жыл бұрын
@@Ck87JF Gear Acquisition Syndrome. Pandemic, unemployment, poverty are all cures!
@jekanyika
@jekanyika 4 жыл бұрын
6:44 A cigar and a cap. That's all the protection you need.
@facitenonvictimarum174
@facitenonvictimarum174 4 жыл бұрын
Wow, great lens! I could read Grace Church, Downtown, 101 W McBee Ave, Greenville SC, and Greenville County on the ambulance.
@paulsheridan424
@paulsheridan424 3 жыл бұрын
Worth mentioning, in case no one else has: this lens has a preset aperture, two rings. One ring "sets" the aperture, and the other must be closed down just before taking a still exposure, or while doing video to actually closed the aperture to the F-stop you have chosen. Leave it open so you can more accurately focus, but remember to work up (on Manual) your exposure settings with the pre-set ring closed, then re-open to frame, and focus and close ring just before exposure or filming. Added problem is every time the lens is touched it creates vibration. For a still photo wait 10-30 seconds for jitters to stop. For video plan to shoot 10 seconds of "waste" footage before action. I see your camera has in-body image stabilization, sensor-shift. Does that help?
@mariahfelixdesouza
@mariahfelixdesouza 5 жыл бұрын
i'm wanting to buy one like this..the same one! was nice to watch this to have a preview idea
@URBANAMERICANTAC
@URBANAMERICANTAC 7 жыл бұрын
For 80 Bucks thats awesome.
@lightningwave
@lightningwave 7 жыл бұрын
Did you by any chance manage to take a photo of the moon? Someone I know wants a cheap way to be able to take picture of the moon.
@airplaneemoji7291
@airplaneemoji7291 7 жыл бұрын
lightningwave I actually have a similar lens and took a picture of the moon that didn't turn out half bad. I used crop mode so it was effectively 1500mm. You can see it here instagram.com/p/9VLNY0Sk_c/
@lightningwave
@lightningwave 7 жыл бұрын
Airplane Emoji Thanks a lot for the link, looks quite good :-) Is this with editing afterwards or straight out of the camera? And do you have a link to the full size file by any chance?
@JeffHettinger34
@JeffHettinger34 7 жыл бұрын
lightningwave you don't need this long of a lens to take great shots of the moon. I took this image with a sigma 70-300mm cropped in post. instagram.com/p/BSzfsH9DWNg/
@fotofillholland
@fotofillholland 7 жыл бұрын
mirror lenses are also fun for this. i had a 500mm one with a x2 teleconverter. But the image quality was terrible, this lens looks a little better, but it's hard to objectify quality on a KZfaq video.
@campervanelvisitoofonyou8720
@campervanelvisitoofonyou8720 7 жыл бұрын
300 mm lens ? How ?
@DaveHaynie
@DaveHaynie 4 жыл бұрын
When you get to really long lenses over distance, your single shot quality is often limited by the atmosphere, not the lens. Up closer, though, the cheaper ones probably have a super long minimum focus range, and show their weaknesses.
@chillzwinter
@chillzwinter 5 жыл бұрын
Whats the moon and saturn look like with that thing - that's a good benchmark test.
@angus5427
@angus5427 4 жыл бұрын
That's what I was thinking I'd use it for
@jaysonharvey1678
@jaysonharvey1678 4 жыл бұрын
The moons not real you idiot.
@scarmsaniiaggrey1646
@scarmsaniiaggrey1646 4 жыл бұрын
You guys expect too much off of 80 bucks!😂
@nugget5515
@nugget5515 4 жыл бұрын
I guess you can expect seeing a planet made of 99% chromatic aberration and 1% atmosphere. As for the moon, depends on the phase. Full moon - Most likely chromatic aberration all around the edge, and too bright to get any natural color and depth. Crescent - chromatic aberration along the edge, the rest too bright except for the darkest visible parts left. New moon - most likely just chromatic aberration.
@leonelpadron5626
@leonelpadron5626 4 жыл бұрын
Hazy and blurry with lots of chromatic aberrations...I'm guessing :|
@Creationsbyelder
@Creationsbyelder 7 жыл бұрын
Actually impressed! Thanks for sharing.
@Sandiafui16
@Sandiafui16 7 жыл бұрын
You should take pahoto of Full Moon by using this lens
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 7 жыл бұрын
+Sandi Afui that's the plan! We are right in the midst of a new moon now though so there is no moon to work with :/ soon though!
@Kriptonyan
@Kriptonyan 7 жыл бұрын
That's no moon...!
@nativetexan5457
@nativetexan5457 7 жыл бұрын
Chris...any joy on that lunar shot yet? That would be my primary focus with a lens like this. I was wondering about it while watching this video.
@MrR2185
@MrR2185 6 жыл бұрын
My thoughts, exactly. Considering how cheap this thing is and how clear it seems to be, it may be worth it for moon shots, alone.
@nbain66
@nbain66 6 жыл бұрын
MrR2185 I have one arriving Tuesday just for that purpose lol
@aznstylepn0y
@aznstylepn0y Жыл бұрын
Thank you. This is what I need for bird and astronomy photography
@tke3ller
@tke3ller Жыл бұрын
I got one thats similar for my Canon T7 and it does pretty good. I havent used it for anything other than moon shots and those come out very well for what it is! Mine came with a X2 converter and the T adapter.
@MrPhilbautista
@MrPhilbautista 7 жыл бұрын
Chromatic aberration control is terrible. Every high contrast area is magenta. Then again, 80 bucks.
@Maxippouce
@Maxippouce 5 жыл бұрын
So easily to fix post production though
@JRiberaMagia
@JRiberaMagia 7 жыл бұрын
Awesome video man!
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 7 жыл бұрын
+Julio Ribera thanks!
@davideastham
@davideastham 4 жыл бұрын
I bought that same exact lens about 25yrs ago for my film camera of the day. It was great for outside football photos. I was impressed for how cheap it was.
@nikosadie
@nikosadie 5 жыл бұрын
Dude! Wicked lens for the price! You can clearly see the strands of hair in the shots... I might buy this!!!
@memedbengul4350
@memedbengul4350 7 жыл бұрын
looks pretty decent. impressed, considering it's 80 bucks. people, keep in mind that some of the softness is ineviteably linked to atmospheric refraction. 1000mm lens+tele cropped by the sensor to 1500mm, is going to pick up serious air turbulence.
@blackcloud5157
@blackcloud5157 5 жыл бұрын
“this might have been a bad idea [...]” what? he’s a genius, he just turned these 80 bucks into a 1000$+ video
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 5 жыл бұрын
Here we go, someone who gets it. I've had dozens of comments telling me that I have wasted my time and money and should do something more productive. Well, it worked out didn't it....
@ThomasQuanter
@ThomasQuanter 4 жыл бұрын
@@ChristopherBurress 👌😂
@AmazingKevinWClark
@AmazingKevinWClark 4 жыл бұрын
@@ChristopherBurress I wouldnt say you wasted your money exactly but you do get what you pay for and a lens like this is fine for amateur photography but if you were doing a professional job then higher quality would be expected and you'd probably wouldnt get away with using an 80 dollar lens. It all depends on the use of the product. If you're just starting out then it's a good tool to get some practice on but eventually it's not going to do the job you're looking for as you progress.
@paulashley2894
@paulashley2894 4 жыл бұрын
@@ChristopherBurress get the 80's version spiratone 500mm for $30 used with better build.
@concernedcitizen5320
@concernedcitizen5320 4 жыл бұрын
@@AmazingKevinWClark Are you serious? This man invested $80, made a video with the lens that now has over 2million views, I'd say he's gotten way more than he paid in the money made from youtube along
@Psi105
@Psi105 6 жыл бұрын
That's much better than i was expecting for $80. Makes me wish my 40D had optical stabilization in the camera. I think you would need it with 1000mm
@tomlemole4164
@tomlemole4164 5 жыл бұрын
Nice review @ChristopherBurress. I'd agree that it does NOT suck for that price and is surprisingly sharp. I might have to check it out and see how it performs with my Nikon 1 series cameras.
@UPhoneIFlip
@UPhoneIFlip 7 жыл бұрын
Perfect stadium graduation lens
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 7 жыл бұрын
+King Flip all except for that stinking f/8
@kkb218
@kkb218 7 жыл бұрын
can't help but ask...it can only be used in broad daylight right? and is f/8 available @1000mm?
@ralfjansen9118
@ralfjansen9118 7 жыл бұрын
With a 2x teleconverter, you lose 2 stops. (1,4x would be 1 stop). Forget 1000mm. You should use a solid tripod and a protected place where is no wind, then you are safe.
@zepzop8471
@zepzop8471 5 жыл бұрын
For what purpose this lens is used , for photography or vediography
@twitmeat
@twitmeat 7 жыл бұрын
What is it with this warp-y video? It's like the whole world warps around you.
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 7 жыл бұрын
+Silvan Schier I accidentally put rolling shutter correction on my b-cam footage that didn't need it... Woops.
@fortythirty
@fortythirty 7 жыл бұрын
Silvan Schier to prove that the earth is round
@PhotographyCol
@PhotographyCol 6 жыл бұрын
To prove that the earth is round? To a flat earther? Good luck with that, they're proper deluded 😂😂😂
@PhenixDj
@PhenixDj 6 жыл бұрын
Its the gravitational field of that lens that warps the space around it. Happens everytime.
@bugbytegaming2458
@bugbytegaming2458 5 жыл бұрын
@@PhenixDj killed me😂😂😂😂
@vincepack5213
@vincepack5213 5 жыл бұрын
Not nearly as bad as I expected! It was kinda surreal once I recognized the buildings (the ambulance gave it away) plus, I thought I recognized that vintage Honda - I see it parked downtown all the time!
@nithinteja9887
@nithinteja9887 5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video man.That's pretty satisfying 😍
@aaronwhitham6625
@aaronwhitham6625 7 жыл бұрын
You deserve wayyyyy more subs for these kinda vids! Keep it up bro it's Really interesting! 👍👍
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 7 жыл бұрын
I like that attitude! I'm gonna keep on making them, I like playing with grown up toys lol might as well make videos about them.
@philindeblanc
@philindeblanc 6 жыл бұрын
I have the Sigma Sport 150-600mm. Its a $2000 lens. The image quality of this $80 looks darn good!
@pippo-1073
@pippo-1073 4 жыл бұрын
CubingWithCarl tampon lol.
@cubingwithcarl4572
@cubingwithcarl4572 4 жыл бұрын
PIPPO-10 Lol changed it now
@sauravbasu8805
@sauravbasu8805 4 жыл бұрын
Do you want to say your Sigma lens sucks? We have all gone through that kind of situation mate, so don't fear to admit
@VIDEOVISTAVIEW2020
@VIDEOVISTAVIEW2020 4 жыл бұрын
it looks impressive. I did not take this lens seriously before, but now that you have shown what it can do, I think I going to get one for me👍
@inthewoodswithbigfoot3941
@inthewoodswithbigfoot3941 3 жыл бұрын
That's cool! I thought that seeing the heat wave distortion was wild!
@DevonWayne
@DevonWayne 7 жыл бұрын
summary.... it does a great job as long as you dont drink redbulls
@DasEtwas
@DasEtwas 7 жыл бұрын
Is it normal for photographers to slam their stuff on the table so brutally?
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 7 жыл бұрын
I think brutally might be a strong word, it was filmed in a kitchen with hard surfaces everywhere, a wooden table, and I microphone about 14 inches away. No camera gear was harmed in the making of this film.thanks for watching though!
@DasEtwas
@DasEtwas 7 жыл бұрын
Christopher Burress :)
@ZZz3rDeYezZZ
@ZZz3rDeYezZZ 6 жыл бұрын
DasEtwas You should see Linus Tech Tips! Dude smashes everything! lol
@sheikhdanish201
@sheikhdanish201 6 жыл бұрын
you should look at Casey Niestat dude literally throws everything
@priyanshdwivedi8151
@priyanshdwivedi8151 6 жыл бұрын
DasEtwas for ne I am very careful with camera and lens because if you do it it could cost you way too much
@MrHoon-ez6jw
@MrHoon-ez6jw 3 жыл бұрын
When you said parking garage I though of the same one in GVL. Nice!
@Forrteroi
@Forrteroi 4 жыл бұрын
Love how the "@500mm" and 1000mm text wobbles as well, the little things lol
@Leo_Dewa
@Leo_Dewa 4 жыл бұрын
Nay, i think he accidentaly put the text on the footage, nest both of them, then warpstabilized it. Usually the text shouldnt be stabilized altogether but it do make sense in this context.
@MHzZz
@MHzZz 4 жыл бұрын
Dude just threw a whole telescope on his camera
@mickeyjmoons
@mickeyjmoons 4 жыл бұрын
There must be a factory somewhere in Asia that churns these lenses out, and it's been doing it since the days of film cameras and wet processing. I've seen them with a dozen different brand names but the performance was always the same... slightly muddy image with less than ideal contrast, which was not ideal with film. Digital however makes these lenses great value for money as any shortcomings can be corrected somewhat in post. Another advantage of these lenses is you'll get to see how much use you'll have for a long lens without spending, and possibly wasting, a lot of money.
@mmadmic
@mmadmic 4 жыл бұрын
Not sure you'd add sharpness in PP.
@davekal
@davekal Жыл бұрын
More than half of the shots I have taken with mine have not been recoverable in lr. I pretty much just use it on rare occasion to shoot the moon lol
@amitbajaj2559
@amitbajaj2559 5 жыл бұрын
Precise to the point review.
@michaelrobert2186
@michaelrobert2186 4 жыл бұрын
I did a photo shoot on that parking garage right where you are standing in Greenville! Good vid. Very interesting!
@Badgertronix
@Badgertronix 7 жыл бұрын
very impressive for the price. Nice review
@Ck87JF
@Ck87JF 4 жыл бұрын
Do you still have this lens? I'd be interested in seeing pictures of the moon.
@davidmichael4750
@davidmichael4750 5 жыл бұрын
great video bro. just what i was looking for
@Realletsplaygrey
@Realletsplaygrey 4 жыл бұрын
I love off brand whacky lenses like this. Good video!
@squirrelonmapletree
@squirrelonmapletree 7 жыл бұрын
Minus the fact that it's not automatic, the image quality is actually really decent. I'm half tempted to make the purchase now, this video gave me some confidence in this lens.
@lennartwars
@lennartwars 7 жыл бұрын
Dude, your Channel is great!
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 7 жыл бұрын
rev_lenni thanks! I'm glad you like it!
@DanielTuriman
@DanielTuriman 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Christopher
@emilioortega9068
@emilioortega9068 5 жыл бұрын
The little thin gear ⚙️ cicle on the lens hood is meant to be put on with the hood and then tightened to secure the lens hood in an upright way
@kings7man
@kings7man 5 жыл бұрын
Gee I could imagine walking round with this lens on my camera
@user-xq6kz7ob5y
@user-xq6kz7ob5y 5 жыл бұрын
I was looking for a street photography lens. Thanks for the video 😊
@Dosteyboi
@Dosteyboi 5 жыл бұрын
thats a really nice lens for vlogging thank you
@willd.8040
@willd.8040 5 жыл бұрын
I own this lens for my Nikon d800 and it’s the cream/white version. It’s absolutely worth it for the price. The images are more than useful and it just looks so damn cool when you’re shooting with it.
@bobolito
@bobolito 5 жыл бұрын
Can you make a video with pictures of the moon or Jupiter? I’ve seen the quality of other lenses and would like to see a comparison.
@Sky69fall
@Sky69fall 4 жыл бұрын
Looks good for my needs
@jasonwest6508
@jasonwest6508 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video. I had been debating whether to get this lens or not. After watching this video, I think I will purchase it after all.
@B-RaDD
@B-RaDD 5 жыл бұрын
That LENS needs it's own tripod
@Ck87JF
@Ck87JF 4 жыл бұрын
If you look at large lenses, cheap to expensive, the tripod mount goes to the lens instead of the camera. Especially when shooting football, they have massive zoom lenses with heavy glass. Try to hang that lens from the camera without being supported, and you'd mess up the mount hole.
@DiegottlosenCharmeure
@DiegottlosenCharmeure 7 жыл бұрын
For that price it achieves pretty damn good results!
@MannyDeGuzmanJr
@MannyDeGuzmanJr 5 жыл бұрын
This 500mm prime preset manual focus lenses comes from many generic brands. I got one under a "Five Star" brand for around 28 USD (PhP1500 Philippine peso) bought surplus from a thrift shop. For the cheap price I paid, I got sharp photos of birds at f11 straight from my Nikon D90 or D300. The 1.3x area crop mode on my Nikon D7100 turns it into a 650mm lens. I was able to follow seagulls and heron in flight, but not the quicker swifts and sparrows - which I use another technique for those shy birds such as pre-focusing and framing while at rest and waiting for it to flap it's wings and fly. It's a bit tricky to use when using full manual, luckily the Nikon D300 and D7100 offers metering for full manual lenses that I use auto ISO and exposure compensation so the exposure is always good under sunny conditions outdoors (shooting in shade or cloudy skies requires to raise ISO at around 1600 to 2500 or so). A bit bulky to travel with a 500mm that big and a heavy D300 so I just bought today a used but good old Panasonic DMC-FZ70 with a hefty 60x zoom (equivalent to 1200mm) which I'm about to try on a light travel. With a superzoom from 20-1200mm you can have all that bulky lenses in one small package, as long as you limit the ISO under 1600 in low light.
@johanbollemus8444
@johanbollemus8444 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing, very cool!
@tcdahn7
@tcdahn7 6 жыл бұрын
Funny that I saw a Dish Network dish on the AT&T building. It's pretty telling when the company that owns DirecTV doesn't use DirecTV. I guess they would know best.
@kevingumfory
@kevingumfory 4 жыл бұрын
This lens FINALLY helped me find my pecker ! I couldn't afford the microscope !
@tim3854
@tim3854 5 жыл бұрын
Nice bit of kit for discreet shooting. Amazing all the extras they threw in. If it was a big brand those add ons would cost more than $80 alone.
@russbowall212
@russbowall212 6 жыл бұрын
First time watching one of your videos. Shocked to see someone else from Greenville South Carolina. Thanks for posting this video.
@HarpreetSingh-wc8jg
@HarpreetSingh-wc8jg 7 жыл бұрын
Very helpful
@ianholmes5951
@ianholmes5951 5 жыл бұрын
I have heard that above 50mm or so is great for capturing peoples faces, do you think there is enough compression at 1000mm to compliment people’s appearance? ;)
@LonesomeTroubadour
@LonesomeTroubadour 5 жыл бұрын
I want to get into nature photography, and this looks like a great, inexpensive way of getting started.
@mmadmic
@mmadmic 4 жыл бұрын
Nature photography with such a slow MF lens ? Except to shoot sloths or trees, not sure it's the best choice, especially in MF. Even the cheapest kit tele-zoom 4 times cropped is probably better. For just a few more money, you'd buy and old 300mm F4 MF from a good company and it's it'll be better and easier to use. Focus peaking at F8 with a 500-1000mm lens without tripod is near to impossible.
@eriksasisubia4367
@eriksasisubia4367 5 жыл бұрын
What a surprise, Hey Chris, I'm Erik from Otavalo, Ecuador. Good video!
@jasonanderson6271
@jasonanderson6271 5 жыл бұрын
Wow, watched most of the video thinking “that looks familiar” before I realized it was 30 minutes from my house. Good review though, maybe fun to look at the moon with the kids if we can avoid breathing on the tripod.
@Pablodiovisuel
@Pablodiovisuel 4 жыл бұрын
Take care, he can spy you up now. °-°
@markparkinson2548
@markparkinson2548 5 жыл бұрын
I nearly peed myself lauighing at the silly petal shaped lens hood,probably off some 24mm lens !
@beninua
@beninua 5 жыл бұрын
You could use it for some fun or interesting effects if you are making an amateur or low budget movie and you want to add a binocular or sniper scope effect to your film. You can always put on an overlay to make it look like a scope in editing/PP. That's at least the most likely use for this thing as I see it, as such shots should often deliberately be a little shaky and a little lo-fi.
@thomasmaughan4798
@thomasmaughan4798 4 жыл бұрын
I have one of those cheap 500mm lenses. It's pretty good; doesn't focus very close and wide open it is f8. Completely manual of course and some cameras handle it better than others.
@BassPlayerAvailable
@BassPlayerAvailable 7 жыл бұрын
So, overall what did you think of it yourself Chris? Worth a punt? Its looks so.
@ChristopherBurress
@ChristopherBurress 7 жыл бұрын
+BassPlayerAvailable I think that if you are wanting some serious reach and don't want to spend a couple grand this is totally an option that I would recommend.
@christopherpowles7249
@christopherpowles7249 5 жыл бұрын
BassPlayerAvailable )
@Lifehatepwn
@Lifehatepwn 4 жыл бұрын
"Im gonna show you a few of the things im planning on shooting at" Man, that sounds wrong when you are sitting on top of a parking garage.
@Charlieczek
@Charlieczek 3 жыл бұрын
Exactly ! Haha :D
@KenGerathsDuck
@KenGerathsDuck 5 жыл бұрын
I bought this for my Canon, as long as I'm using a remote trigger it works pretty well
@skwrttj
@skwrttj 3 жыл бұрын
Much sharper than I expected... NOT real photo award winning glass, BUT pretty good. I could see it as a reasonable movie lens for hobbiests. Of course you are limited by atmospheric conditions. Thanks for testing it. I liked it best at the 500mm range mostly cuz it’s less susceptible to vibration.
$200 - 2600MM TELEPHOTO LENS TEST
15:55
Chase Guerdet
Рет қаралды 143 М.
DO THIS WITH EVERY NEW CAMERA!
11:41
Simon d'Entremont
Рет қаралды 531 М.
когда достали одноклассники!
00:49
БРУНО
Рет қаралды 3,5 МЛН
Ну Лилит))) прода в онк: завидные котики
00:51
Eccentric clown jack #short #angel #clown
00:33
Super Beauty team
Рет қаралды 24 МЛН
The Worlds Most Powerfull Batteries !
00:48
Woody & Kleiny
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
Sony A6500 TELESCOPE MOUNT!
9:07
Christopher Burress
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Camera Mirror Lenses Part 1: Visual and Interferometric Testing
21:18
Huygens Optics
Рет қаралды 239 М.
The CHEAPEST 500mm Lens for WILDLIFE - How Good Can it be?
10:59
Olle Nilsson
Рет қаралды 231 М.
3 MISTAKES that EVERY TOURIST makes. SLEEPING SYSTEM
19:16
Владимир Чайкин
Рет қаралды 236 М.
Macro photography ideas to shoot at home
4:43
COOPH
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
Getting the Most Out of Low Budget Photo Gear
12:06
f64 Academy
Рет қаралды 30 М.
TT Artisan NEW 500mm f/6.3 Telephoto Lens (Moon Photography)
15:18
Alyn Wallace
Рет қаралды 45 М.
Shooting with a RARE $26,000 lens!
4:42
Tom Calton
Рет қаралды 109 М.
$600-$2,000: 10 Wildlife Photography Lenses Reviewed!
19:06
Tony & Chelsea Northrup
Рет қаралды 535 М.
когда достали одноклассники!
00:49
БРУНО
Рет қаралды 3,5 МЛН