Lies again? Panasonic Slow USD SGD

80s

Because Star Wars was born out of the raygun gothic space operas like Flash Gordon that George Lucas probably watched every weekend at Saturday matinees.

​@@NazriBwhat?

Check out the 1980s Flash Gordon. They tried to make it look classic in a cool way

Gotta love ai

50s look

This is the best of the lot. I want to get lost in this world for 2 hours.

Yes they are

I like how the pod racers have wheels 😅

I wish Lucas had actually done it that way.

@@voss0749 he did it the way he did it for a reason

Shhhhh!!! You'll give George Lucas ideas, and he'll go back and change it all again!

No longer have to…👍👍✨

@@airborngrmp1 l take

Dune 2021 *cough* *cough*

​@@donmikolo overrated cough cough

There are some really great imo fan edits out there including several of the Star wars movies as silent films in black and white.

@@SammySam7x I couldn't agree more. It's one of the most boring blockbusters I've ever seen.

First time? Oh ye of little taste.

That's good. You've taken your first step into a larger world.

Which creature in this video identified as Jar Jar Binks ?

"Jar Jar is the key to all of this." -Sun Tzu

Fun fact I designed Ahmed Bests website about 10 yrs ago (this reminded me to see what looks like these days and see it down, n so I just text him about this!)

I prefer a lot of the visuals to the ones in the movies. The style is superior IMO. The movies looked too "cartoony". And it is the case with most modern CGI movies including Marvel and DC movies. While these are CGI as well ofc, the style is a lot cooler.

I THOUGHT THE SAME!

Came here to write this!

@@Member_zero AI is not CGI. It's a collection of still images, or short video clips, spliced together. It's nothing like actual computer animation or traditional film. It will be a very long time before it challenges either.

@@miltonkiller707 Well that's ok. I understand. My point was about the art style of the movie rather than the technique. You could make the same or similar looking aliens in the movie with CGI + costumes. But the art direction of most modern CGI movies went the other way - they look more comic book like or cartoon like. Like a game cutscene. This visual style is a lot more "grounded" for the lack of better word. English isn't my first language, so I hope I'm making sense. It is also why I prefer the art direction of the first 3 Star Wars movies to the sequels or Disney series.

Yeah this is like an LP (long playing album) going at 16 revolutions per second. Action packed lol

Why in my day you were lucky if driving a pod racer was faster than just walking.

Remember you're judging it by today's standards. In the 50s this would have been mind blowing to them.

@@RealEnerjak watch a bunch of movies from those years, then we'll talk.

In 10-20 years imagine being able to watch alternative endings or versions of your favorite movies or series. Or telling an AI box the parameters of a movie you want to see and it produces it. Hollywood will be out of jobs.

@@findingm4101 That's like saying once inkjet printers were invented, traditional oil paint manufacturers will be out of work, or worse, "no one will buy genuine paintings". What actually happened is that real paintings increased in value. Same will happen with Hollywood. There will be movies and there will be "REAL movies". AI isn't even on the level of "dumb" yet. It will forever need a guiding hand because it has no way of perceiving the world, it has no.... -soul- idea of itself.

100%.. thats a GREAT way to describe this.. the Phantom Menace trailer from an alternate history.. damn, this was weird and cool at the same time..

@@Subhumanoid_ True story. The cheaper automatic production becomes, the more manual, human work becomes more valuable.

@@findingm4101 That's not a good thing.

I’d also like to see a take on Bladerunner, RoboCop, Aliens, and the Terminator films (1 & 2).

I know it's a different genre but what about The Shining?

@@davbooms Ohh, now you’re talking. Or “The Omen” (the 1976 original).

@@feliscorax yay Terminator today!

@@feliscorax Hmm... who to play the T-800? Victor Mature? Johnny Weissmuller?

No you didn’t

Yes I can see why Anakin was taken with her, honestly I would want to be with both.

That’s why I’m here.

Amidala IS Padme.

@@RockBrentwood which she already was.

@@caselleknoxiv589ok, gooner

in TRON they were literally riding mountain bikes with NEON on them LOL

Grand Prix (1966)

@@HarcMad George Lucas was Additional camera operator on that film.

50s hot pods

@@Wafaloo lol, good one mate.

nailed it !

I don't think so. It's not that easy to mimic action, movement, and deliver convincing dialog. Even AI voice cloning is badly flawed. This is an illusion, an old technology given more scope by better computer systems. It's nothing more than a collection of (slightly moving) stills derived from a database. Remember the old video morphing thing from decades back? It's more or less the same thing, only using that technique in more ways. Will they eventually figure out how to have AI create complete motion pictures? Well, it's possible, but I don't think this will happen in the next 5 years, if ever. The person producing these videos has to put in many hours of work, prompting, creating or finding training data, selecting or creating premade music, using editing software. No AI system can do this autonomously. Furthermore, the subject material is well documented online, existing previously. Trying to produce even a slide show like this, based on new bespoke characters and environments, using AI, is practically impossible.

@@miltonkiller707well I hope you’re right. This is getting too crazy

At the current rate of progress, 5 years may be pessimistic.

@@NZealand There's nothing special about it. If you look closely it's all vaguely familiar versions of known images, and short video clips of people. Sign up to one of these AI art portals, and test it out. Type in something specific, using no known or popular examples. Ask for some kind of action pose including hands and a gun. You'll quickly realize how frustrating it is to find a completely different image each time you press generate, with mutant hands, detached or multiple limbs, different coloured eyes, and sundry figures in the background. They're trying to figure out ways to fix these things, but it's all counterintuitive. There's no way AI will produce anything approaching broadcast quality fare without exorbitant manual labour behind the scenes.

Maybe not 5 years, but 10 years we will see short 15 minute films made entirely by AI, and in 20 years full length 2+ hour movies

I like how he sounds like he's not at all interested. "Read script, collect paycheck."

I have a nice feeling imagining that time I never lived. I am happy that you experienced these simpler times.

That’s made by AI

Which looks better than the CGI one in the movie.

​@@Mind_of_MATT no

@@Mind_of_MATT lol no

Thats Dar Dar Bonk!

I think George Lucas saw these originally as Saturday movie serials. Perhaps he even envisioned it in this style! He is the right age for these types of childhood memories!

If you are in tune with Wes Anderson, Asteroid City might suit you 😊

@@scottkozinski6199that’s because Flash Gordon did inspire George Lucas. He said so himself. Check out “how to watch Star Wars: the prequels are better movies than you deserve.”

@@scottkozinski6199 Oh, that's a really good point. He is the right age for these to be in his mind's eye

No sh*t! As would I, and apparently, like, everyone! It would be so bizarre and beautiful.

How wonderful would that be

That would be the worst possible scenario. It would just be woke check boxes with cool imagery & no beautiful women.

@@Mind_of_MATT Well, clearly not if it was made by whoever was doing these. But if a big corporation did it... *sigh*

just wait a couple years

In 5 years you probably will with AI

@@eskanda3434Copyright laws are too strict for that sadly.

@@solank7620 disney will make you pay to watch it dont worry

@@eskanda3434 It's not going to happen.

@@eskanda3434 If it does happen it will be fraudulent, as in a movie made the traditional way but passed off as "AI."

Yes I agree the prequels should of had a more vintage style to them.

They needed to be made the same way the original trilogy was created. To have a look of continuity

@@user-qe5ou2je6i yea but still, a man can dream.

The Star Wars prequels are masterpieces .

And legs 😂

and walking. in the other other is completely weird in the crowd scenes it looks like everyone is sidestepping forwards. but the concept is really great.

Yeah...but give it 6 months to 1 year. Lol.

Yes!!!!!

Or Debbie Does Dallas

Starship Troopers has always needed the special kind of futuristic look that went out of style decades ago.

Poster goes hard af

I buy that

I would also get sued by Disney unfortunately.

@@abandonedfilms Maybe if you used an alternate platform, like Playeur or something (there are many, surely there's one that allows monetization of fanmade stuff)? And it's just like fan art, isn't it? People sell that. I remember I once heard a story of someone who wasn't allowed to sell food in a school (paninis), so they sold paper towels and with each paper towel came a free panini. I'm sure there's some loophole you can find :)

​@@MerryGoldberryits disney not some school. The ai is using their property for the images, 99,9% chance he wont win with such loopholes

and have wheels

Yeah lol but actually everything is very slow which adds to the weirdness

You are watching those things. Generative AI finds images based on prompts and splices them together. You're looking at the faces of actors filmed in the 50s with physical cameras.

Sora, by OpenAI. Or another AI video generator like Sora.

AI

Just what I have been wondering.

Not Sora - that one is really advanced.

It is used in the exact same way - creating visuals while removing a human factor. This one is more tolerated because it looks better.

There goes human creativity, from now on everything is AI generated. Think of how much cheaper it’s going to be to create.

*That* explains soo much of his personality.

That was supposed to be Jar Jar ? Impossible ! This little guy is capable of being loved with those cute bulging eyes .

Meesa thinkin' u be passin' da bong Massa Obi

Yeah I don't know how you and others figured out that that is Jar Jar lol

Yousa recognised heesa?

SAME

If you're on the Internet, you have a thesaurus. 😅

Ah...M2Mil7er..I do realize this and still know exactly what I was writing.It was just my way of showing how I, personally, feel about these clips.I'm not replying in any sort of sarcasm or anger..don't want to start a comments war..just expressing how staggeringly fantastic these little 'movies' are.Thanx.

Don’t know about that one

Revenge Of The Sith

@@chasehedges6775 yessssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

@@ObsessedCollector 🙏🙏🙏🙏

​@@chasehedges6775 gonna be honest I find Revenge of the Sith underwhelming in comparison to the other 2 prequel movies. I still like it though.

1999's Phantom Menace is a masterpiece.

The Star Wars prequel without Natalie Portman, Ewan McGregor, Liam Neeson and Duel of the Fates can only be crap. Sorry bro.

I fully agree with you, brother. 99's Phantom Menace is an absolute masterpiece. I vividly remember when I first saw the movie at the cinema, I was 15 and had to deal with issues but this flick made me immediately forget everything, I was glued to the screen and my eyes became glassy. Thank you for refreshing this wonderful memory 💙🙏🏽

Yes, it's a bit of an "Elephant in the room" the way the prequels depict a world much more "futuristic" than the originals

It is, of course, the result of the prequel films having the benefit of more advanced filming techniques, but I like to think of the dissonance as the damage of the Empire, that progress has been rewound by oppression. Ever been into a pub in a deprived area, and the staff, clientele, and decor are so old-fashioned that you're like, "this place feels like it's stuck in the 80s"? That's what the OT feels like to me.

They did. Well, more of an Art Deco aesthetic in places too. Naboo? The Royal Starship? Naboo fighters. Dex's Diner. The Noir detective elements. A pod race scene mirroring Lucas' obsession with '50s culture (see: American Graffiti) Sure, it looked cleaner than the OT, but that was because the Republic hadn't fallen yet.

George did exactly that though. The Prequels have a gilded age/art deco styling in all of the ships, buildings, and clothing. Whereas the OT has more gritty 70s industrial styling since it’s supposed to be 30 years apart. The dvd commentaries for Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones actually go into detail about this.

@@wolfmauler Thats before the fall of the republic and everything. Its supposed to look great because what followed was the downfall - dark times.

🪭THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the last age in which God is saving man from the imminent destruction of this old world" (Because the Lord Jesus incarnate did the work of the Age of Grace, for 2,000 years, all of Christianity referred the one true God as the "trinity." Therefore, the religious identifies, the one true God as the trinity, separate Him, throughout time. The world of religion cherishes strictly to it and refuses to change at all times. Now, the Almighty God of the last days has come to do the work of judgment, revealing all the means that save humanity. He completely dispute the greatest error of Christianity---the trinity. If God didn't expose this lie directly, we would not discover the foolishness within the idea of the trinity. Almighty God says, "if any one of you says that the trinity really exists, then explain what exactly this one God in three persons is? What is the Holy Father? What is the Son? What is the Holy One? Spirit? Is Jehovah the Holy Father? Is Jesus the Son? So what about the Holy Spirit? 'There is only One God, only One person in this God, and only One Spirit of God, as it is written in the Bible that there is only One Holy Spirit and only One God.' In simple words, God is the Spirit, but He can be flesh and live with people, as well as above all things. His Spirit is all and everywhere. He can be in the flesh and above the universe at the same time. Don't you know Jesus was born through the conception of the Holy Spirit? Inside Him is the Holy Spirit; no matter what you say, He is still God in heaven, because He is the incarnation of God Spirit. This idea of a child is simply not true.) Almighty God said Because the LORD JESUS ​​INCARNATE did the WORK of the AGE of GRACE, for 2,000 YEARS, ALL of CHRISTIANITY REFERRED to the ONE TRUE GOD as the "Trinity." Because the BIBLE MENTIONS the FATHER, the SON, and the HOLY SPIRIT, they PROMOTE that GOD must be a TRINITY. ☀️ There was some debate, but most people stuck to the idea of ​​the Trinity without any change. Some people say "Trinity," and others say "Three in One," which are essentially the same, and mean the same thing. Whether we say "Trinity" or "Three in One," it says that God is made up of three parts, They are not the one God. Only when they are together can they become one true God. It's just a ridiculous thing to say. Can you really say that Jehovah God is not the only true God? Or is the Lord Jesus not the only true God? Is NOT the HOLY SPIRIT the ONE TRUE GOD? 🙏 Is NOT this CONCEPT of the TRINITY a REJECTION and DESTRUCTION of the ONE TRUE GOD? Isn't the one true God being carved up and blasphemed? We can see how crazy this idea of ​​the Trinity is. THEREFORE, the RELIGIOUS WORLD IDENTIFIES the ONE TRUE GOD as the TRINITY, SEPARATE Him THROUGHOUT TIME. It is very painful for God. 😢 The WORLD of RELIGION CHERISHES STRICTLY to it and REFUSES to change at ALL TIMES. NOW, the ALMIGHTY GOD of the LAST DAYS has COME to DO the WORK of JUDGMENT, REVEALING ALL the MEANS that SAVE HUMANITY. He COMPLETELY DISPUTE the GREATEST ERROR of CHRISTIANITY---the TRINITY. 🙏 It OPENED our EYES and we PRAISED CHRIST from our HEARTS as the WAY, the TRUTH, and the LIFE, and PRAISED. WISDOM and MIGHTY in ALL GOD. 🙏 If GOD DIDN'T EXPOSE this LIE DIRECTLY, we WOULD NOT DISCOVER the FOOLISHNESS WITHIN the IDEA of the TRINITY. ☀️ Let's take a closer look at this by reading some of God's words. ALMIGHTY GOD says, "If ANY ONE of YOU SAYS that the TRINITY REALLY EXISTS, then EXPLAIN what EXACTLY this ONE GOD in THREE PERSONS is.. WHAT is the HOLY FATHER? What is the Son? What is the Holy One?" Spirit? ☀️ Is JEHOVAH the HOLY FATHER? Is JESUS ​​the SON? So WHAT ABOUT the HOLY SPIRIT? Isn't the WORK of JESUS ​​the WORK of the HOLY SPIRIT? ISN'T JEHOVAH'S WORK DONE by a SPIRIT SIMILAR to JESUS's? How many Spirits can God have? According to your explanation, the three persons of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are one; So, then, there are three Spirits, but the existence of three Spirits means that there are three Gods. That is, there is no one true God; how can this kind of God still have the natural essence of God? ☀️ If you accept that there is only one God, then how can He have a son and be a father? Aren't these all just your notions? 'THERE is ONLY ONE GOD, ONLY ONE PERSON in this GOD, and ONLY ONE SPIRIT of GOD, as it is WRITTEN in the BIBLE that there is ONLY ONE HOLY SPIRIT and ONLY ONE GOD.' 🙏 Regardless of when the Father and the Son you say existed, there is only one God after all, and the spirit of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit that you believe in is the spirit of the Holy Spirit. In SIMPLE WORDS, GOD is the SPIRIT, BUT He can be FLESH and LIVE with PEOPLE, as WELL as ABOVE ALL THINGS. His SPIRIT is ALL and EVERYWHERE. He CAN be in the FLESH and ABOVE the UNIVERSE at the SAME TIME. 🙏 everyone says that God is the only true God, then there is only one God, who is not divided by anyone! He became three persons, each with a status and a Spirit; then how can He still be a Spirit and a God? Tell Me, was heaven and earth, and all things created by the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit? say that They created it all together. Then who redeemed mankind? Is it the Holy Spirit, the Son, or the Father? Some say that the Son redeemed mankind. So who is the Son essentially? Is He NOT the INCARNATION of GOD'S SPIRIT? The incarnation calls God in heaven by the name of the Father from the perspective of a created man. DON'T YOU KNOW JESUS ​​was BORN THROUGH the CONCEPTION of the HOLY SPIRIT? ☀️ INSIDE Him is the HOLY SPIRIT; no matter what you say, He is STILL GOD in HEAVEN, BECAUSE He is the INCARNATION of GOD'S SPIRIT. ☀️ This IDEA of a CHILD is SIMPLY NOT TRUE. 😪 It is a Spirit that does all the work; only God Himself, that is, the Spirit of God does His work. Who is the Spirit of God? ☀️ Is NOT the HOLY SPIRIT? ISN'T the HOLY SPIRIT WORKING in JESUS? If the work is not performed by the Holy Spirit (that is, the Spirit of God), then can His work represent God Himself?" 🙏 From "The WORD Appears in the Flesh" Fulfilled in " (John 1:1). (Ezekiel 2:9-10). (Rev. 19:13). 📥Calling and leading everyone to His lowered Kingdom or Church because it is still standing on earth in the holy place in the air/ youtube "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD 💐 this is the fulfillment of what He said to Peter 2,000 years ago, recorded in (Matthew 16:18'19). This is the the only Church of each one of our spirit that we must listen to or eat and drink like how we eat, dress and sleep every day so that He can guide us and change us by rejecting the evil attached by Satan so as to be perfect, having attained eternal life that will enter the coming replacement of the New Heaven and New Earth. 💌

The Star Wars prequels are masterpieces.

No.

He can't because that movie is no where near as documented a Star Wars. You'd end up with vintage book cover designs, morphing from frame to frame.

Because it costs nothing but electricity and Internet costs to splice images together.

No.

No it doesn't - the Episode 1 we got was great. This looks all warped. Don't be an incel bro.

What!? Why? I don't see it that way, I think this is pretty interesting I mean can you imagine? I don't know about you but I like it.

​@@franciscoramirez4179I think he meant it in the good way. Not bad meaning bad but bad meaning good

No