You only give me a remixed album...

@@CB-xr1eg And in the middle of the exploitation, you repeat buy...

that's so funny guys.. had me and my girlfriend laughing...well done

Out of college, money spent, hear no outtakes, pay my rent

@@methampheminist All the outtakes gone, nowhere to go.

His voice is getting similar

It's uncanny, he looks like the old black and white pictures of George Martin in the studios; the somewhat older, distinct looking gentlemen in the studio

His father would be rolling in his grave if he could hear the remix.

I agree with everything you all said except, mcmike 100.. his father couldn’t hear anymore, thats why he hired Giles as his “ears” i think they sound great

@@mcmike100 I have not heard the remix. Is it that bad??

The son every Dad hopes his son will become.... respectful & hard working.

his Dad would have never taken these risks... just saying..

@@cmkilcullen8176 His Dad's stock-in-trade WAS taking risks - constantly...

Not quite as posh, but very few people do sound as posh as George!

@@slothfromthegoonies8201 - The funny thing is George Martin was born in a working class environment and it was Giles who was born "well to do" as they say.

Not to mention his looks and his hair ;)

George Martin actually originally had a thick Cockney accent, and worked to change it to the posh one we associate him with.

@@thewilythylacine Nonsense, he was born in Highbury north London, so why would he have a " thick Cockney accent "? Cockneys come from East London.

And sadly, he failed.

@@mcmike100 I wouldn't say he failed. Sgt. Pepper sounds incredible for the most part, The White Album was good, but Abbey Road was unnecessary. There's nothing wrong with the remix, but it didn't need to be done.

I wouldn’t want him mixing a scrambled egg.Just a money making meddler

@@ian_5184 if you think Sgt. Pepper sounded incredible, you must like the volume war. Pepper was unneccarily over compressed. I returned the CD. Giles did a great job with Pepper on Rock Band. Get those 4 CD's if you can find them

@@mcmike100 If one is against increased warmth and clarity, an improved stereo image, reduced tape hiss, then yes, he failed. Otherwise, he did a great job.

@Top40Bill also Rain and/or Paperback Writer I'm dying for listening She Said, She Said in a new stereo mix

Revolver will be done, trust me :) I have heard from a good source.

@@petemarr824 As much as I love 'Revolver', even with the 2009 remastered version it sounds harsh compared to 'Rubber Soul' so if they do remix it, I hope it has a crisper, less harsher sound but still packed with a punch.......Millenials won't know what they're hearing with a remixed 'Tomorrow Never Knows', they will surrender to the Beatles.

@@terrythekittieful The Revolver remaster you refer to (on vinyl) is “blustery”-how I’d describe it, not sure if that’s the same as “harsh”-too bassy at times. Making it a “crisper” stereo mix may require less extreme panning, which may also turn off a lot of people.

you got your wish!

Damm right, in my collage they(the professor's) keep on going on about how physical mediums are dead and noone uses them any more which is pattently untrue.

Agreed!

Vinyl? Yes CD? Hell, no that shit's dying and it's for the best

@Jim McCracken with the rise of digital music, I think it is now simpler to find some bootlegs even though I did find some rare beatles recordings on vinyl. The disc seller kept it hidden for me cause he knew I was a Beatles fan

Yeah, I am saving up for The White Album and Abbey Road Deluxe sets.

this...

@@manuelgasse I think that Rubber Soul was remixed in some way when originally released on CD. I know it says ADD not AAD on the label.

"Let It Be" will be next. Guaranteed

Dave McLain ill have to find that. My copy of rubber soul is that left-right separation annoying sound. With drums bass and things on the left, vocals on the right. maybe I should just digitize my original final US release with "I just seen her face" as the first song.

@@DaveMcLain for the original 1987 CD releases, George Martin went back and remixed "Help!" and "Rubber Soul". Those remixes are what were used for the 2009 stereo remasters. The original 1965 stereo mixes were included as bonus tracks on the 2009 Mono box set of those albums. However, the very first pressing of the 1987 CDs from Canada contain the original 1965 stereo mixes. They were released by mistake, and are rare as hell.

I think the majority of his input on the first project ceased about nine months before.

That's true - there's not much that can be done with those tapes, or those of the second album.

Oh Yes!!!!

@@ClarenceFisher For stereo, not without (potentially controversial) digital extraction. For surround, I'd love a professional (I'd done my own amateur mixes) surround mix using a front/back/sub balance of the twin tracks instead of the left/right hard panning as per the traditional stereo mixes.

@@coryserratore5951 Would Love To Hear You'r Amateur Mixes But I Do Agree It Would Be Potentially Controversial To Audiophiles. On The Other Hand Wouldn't They Risk Damaging The Master Tape?

There's not much you could do with the early ones up to Help. I think those are best in mono, but I'm confused why they didn't start with Rubber Soul and Revolver. Those 4-tracks would be so cool remixed with outtakes.

"Penning a moustache on the Mona Lisa" was a pretty one, too.

YES!!!!!! We know how great Rubber Soul can sound just by hearing "Nowhere Man" from the Yellow Submarine Songtrack remixed album in 1999. Superb!!!

Jon Woolsey exactly. I love that yellow submarine album. That Nowhere man mix sounds so good.

& MMT

It's not "charming". It's brilliant.

westfield90 hey bulldog,great idea‼️ I had some bootlegs of early Beatles with rubber soul out takes, but of coarse there wasn't any nowhere man. They perform nowhere Man on the live in Japan album , those harmonies sound like butter. Unfortunately they were tapes and are long gone. Oh blood DO blood die all life goes on🍏

@@poppinpatty2507 Coarse

I wouldn't be surprised, and some fans here and on other places, (Facebook, Instagram, etc.,) are predicting that we'll get every Beatle album from PPM to Revolver in a remixed/deluxe release...as for the complete opening of the vaults of EVERY take, mix, and such...Apple would probably do it inhouse instead of using an outside outlet...I'd love it, but The Beatles and Apple Corp may not wanna go overboard like they've done with Elvis...

The idea sounds nice, but I disagree. They're better off holding on to them and putting them on rerelease and what not. If they release it all at once, they'll have nothing more to put out and the Beatles will truly be a band of the past

I, too, would love to hear all that. However, one thing to keep in mind and oft-forget is that Michael Jackson purchased nearly all the rights to Beatles songs after outbidding the combined effort of both Paul and Yoko. One ironic and sad chapter in that is that it was during the sessions of Paul and Michael Jackson on their smash collaboration "Say, say, say" that Paul had mentioned to Michael that owning copyrights was a great way to make money. Then, the asshole, Michael, took "his friend's" advice and bought all the rights to Beatles songs, resulting in the fact that, at that time, whenever you heard a Beatles song, Michael would receive royalties, not The Beatles. I must admit, however, I do not know what is the present state of Beatles' royalties lies. Here is something from 2017: "McCartney lost the rights to the Beatles catalog back in 1985, when Michael Jackson outbid him when they went up for sale. Jackson paid more than $47 million for ATV, the company that had owned copyrights to Beatles songs since 1967. A decade later, Jackson sold half of his share to Sony for $100 million" I can neither confirm or deny the accuracy of my last paragraph; however, here is the source I am using 2019 Ultimate Classic Rock is part of the Loudwire Network, Townsquare Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Read More: Paul McCartney and Sony Settle Beatles Copyright Suit | ultimateclassicrock.com/paul-mccartney-sony-beatles-copyright/?

Not entirely true. Portions of the White Album were recorded with an 8-track console, and that was the first one recorded in stereo.

There are other engineers/producers who are out there remixing classic albums and could have done equally as good, if not better, at remixing Abbey Road. Giles inherited this opportunity, he didn't exactly earn it. He's got a couple Grammys, but they were for Beatles stuff (go figure!).

100%

Adamthegreat984 rumor has it thr Let It Be project will be remixed by Phil Spector’s son 😎

This HAS to happen, surely?

what movie?

I prefer the Let it be naked version

That's gonna be massive!!!!!...I can't even imagine how many CD's that'll be...

Im praying we get an All Things Must Pass Box to with a "Naked" mix...

I mean, they can release the get back album considering how much stuff has been recorded

Flame-inn-Gun$ Gaming we can always dream... 😢

I think Let It Be...Naked was the best mix that McCartney made. Now that would be a treat to hear from Giles!

Would George Harrison like his tie I wonder.

There's nothing worse than a silent menu because one is never sure if the audio settings are correct - at least for those of us with multiple audio-visual inputs. Define "reasonable speed". For me the second I hear sound on the menu I'm on to where I want to go. The sound bothers me not one iota.

I'm probably not explaining this very well. I'll try to post a typical menu navigation through a classical (Bach's St. Matthew Passion) and a Beatles disc to show what I mean. It's absolutely _maddening._ That's why the Rolls-Royce of DVD publishing like Criterion or Masters of Cinema use either silent menus, or menus with very quiet ambient "space" sound that _gradually fades in_ or at least _enters after a few seconds' delay._ Just try to navigate through the menus for the recent Beatles video collection: you'll end up constantly chopping off bits of very _loud_ (and very good) music. It's absolutely _unbearable._ I always set my amplifier to "Mute" before putting any disc in except the aforementioned Rolls-Royces. Also most Hollywood films have well-designed menus with good music. But all the special Beatles releases over last couple of years are just _dreadful_ in that one department. everything else is purrfect.

And Geoff Emerick,don't forget him as well!

Nope...no mono mixes of Abbey Road were ever made...it was released in Brazil, and some other countries in mono, but they're simply a fold-down of the stereo mix...

Yeah, it's unbelievable. And everybody just falls into line.

Not even close. There’s so much about it that can be improved. Some songs on the second side even sound bad. The 2019 remix is vastly superior. I’ve got hi-fi equipment. I’ve never understood the praise for Abbey Road’s production

@@TheJayson8899 Sorry their work wasn't up to your standards.

@@TheJayson8899 Would you like it if he auto-tuned it as well? Or locked the tempo to a grid?

The 2019 mix is *way* better than the 2009 remix. Way better.

Gordon Stanley -Alan Parsons did just release a great new CD and is currently on the road in the US.

@@astrosjer822 SMH

Well, he was only tape op on a couple tracks, I think?

Magical Mystery Tour isn't a proper Beatles album but a compilation made up by a double EP and 3 singles from 1967.