Right, crazy!

Exelente point! If someone steals a BICYCLE worth $1,000 or more that's a felony in most states. But most states have no laws regarding squatters in your property. Insane.

That's something I have wondered. Can you just take a car if it has been sitting there for a few days? Produce a fake car lease?

Damn blacks!!

​@@Adr_Jim/ This is a lie we are being told. There is laws and those laws make the homeowner have all the power over squatters but the laws are not being enforced

That's NY where they protect the criminals not the law bidding citizens.

Welcome to marxism, and thank your local Democrat! November 5, 2024 TRUMP MAGA, baby!!!

@@delanabunch8990 This has been happening for a long time under both Rep. Trump is a criminal do you think he will fix this? I highly doubt it. More concern about Russia and Ginaa. Get it. LOL

Oh my God! Wake up already! 'You will have nothing and you will be happy" is it ringing a bell to you yet?!

The person doesnt own the home. The bank does. CRY ABOUT IT 😂

Should be a law in all states

Actually, you need to go to court and sign a declaration that you are the owner and the people there are not renting from you. If you lie, your ass is on the line.

Probably the only decent thing DeSantis has ever done for Florida.

He just signed the bill, he didn't come up with it.

Florida has real governor who does his job.

The laws allowing squatter's rights are hundreds of years old. This is how America has lived for many generations; unused property can be "squatted" on. In one sense, this seems fair - when housing is needed and is intentionally held off the market, that should ALSO be a crime. But this has been taken too far.

Id get my house back one way or another trust me😂

​@michaelanderson3816 no personal obligation toward Squatters.

Sorry but they only have the right to go to jail for breaking and entering

Squatters should go squat in China's properties around the country

But what if the dude that signed the lease had no idea it was false? I think arresting him would be wrong.

@@Burncsb bruh you're dim. signing a false lease is entirely different from falsifying one.

​@@Burncsb if all voters are like you than the country is doomed.

Robbing from 7-11 should have the same minimum sentence, but I bet I can't get you to agree on that.

I agree

Great state to move to!

You have an awesome Governor!

Thank God and governor Disanti for this home owner law 🎉

I like the fact that he is a doer THANK GOODNESS! Now for the school system.

Some democrats in the state legislature voted against it.

@@alaska-bornfloridaman Stop lying. It passed the House 108-0 and the Seanate 39-0. Not to mention the news report said it passed unanimously, although I doubt you know the definition of that.

@@mitchell1786 This is the third version of this bill, because democrats kept voting against a straight bill. Some even abstained from voting at all on it. I tried to post the link to it, but YT deleted it. Blue states would never pass a bill like this.

@@mitchell1786 ABCnews keeps deleting my tweets showing which democrats voted against this bill 3 times.

Yes, Florida has a lot of good laws. can't wait to move there

especially because it wasn't their first time

In my view it is fraud - which is a crime here in the UK.

​@@Halo3Matalix 2nd time is Life

@@TheOneTrueNoName 100%

Agree… it’s fraud

The word is “baffling” or… “perplexing”. What makes it not delusional is the fact that it is, sadly, true in the USA.

because they enforce whatever the law says regardless of whether it benefits or harms anyone hell it's still "legal" to mutilate baby boys bodies yet parents and doctors don't get punished for this crap

Because the NYPD are corrupt

Cuídate de Nationwide mutual insurance company son sinvergüenzas estafadores

Damage and fraud in this case would fall under civil tort law. You can sue the squatters, if you can find them. The problem being finding them.

@@omi_godSue the squatters? You can’t get blood from a stone. They have nothing to take.

@@themetalhead1463 Oh, I don't know about that - they must have plenty of ready cash, given that they don't pay rent.

@@omi_godyou really think these people got money 💰 😅 good luck getting a dime from them their probably homeless plus if they flee good luck finding them lool

Im surprised it isnt tbh. Itd a serious legal document

It already is! The problem is that police don't want to actually do their jobs. These criminals break 100 laws that are easily verifiable. For example, the police can just ask the neighbors next door if the person broke into the house. But doing any type of "investigation" is considered doing work.

@@D.E._Sarcarean From what I gather from the video they explictly said falsifying a lease is a misdemeanor?

@@D.E._Sarcarean That's absolutely not true; when an officer responds they have no way of knowing right then and there who is a legal occupant and who isn't given that leases can be forged. All they know is somebody dialed 911 and they're obligated to respond. This is why they tell folks to take it to court, where it can be concretely proven who is the owner and who isn't, because cops aren't lawyers. Granted this law is needed especially in situations where it is VERY clear that the occupants do not belong on a property, as it closes the loophole being exploited to save needless months of disputing easily proven fact. You still have to go to court, but this streamlines the process of getting the squatters out.

I don’t think you understand. It is criminal, but only if the property is owned by a large corporation. THEN they get arrested for breaking and entering, vandalism, and fraud. But if Joe Bob the plumber wants to rent out half his duplex to cover property tax and insurance, corporations don’t want Joe Bob getting any big ideas, so no police protection for Joe Bob.

Yah, be careful about that. They can shoot you on site in Texas, I think. Understandable about not letting you enter someone else’s land for hunting, though. Might be dangerous for the human occupants or their pets.

I think in every state it takes some time before the tenants have any rights. If you check your property occasionally it would help a lot. There are scammers who will rent out houses they don’t own. That screws over both sides. We need better laws, but we also need reasonable housing available.

The woman for n Florida gave advice to put up No trespassing signs on the property.

If you can hang on for seven years in FL as a squatter the property becomes yours. Amazing how this country can't pass simply laws but coughs up billions for security and defense of any country with it's hand out.

@@angelaw9476 yeah republicans SUCK DICKS don't they?

Its complete lunancy

An old law, a couple hundred years old. One that needs to end quickly. It's just ridiculous.

It is INSANE

The concept of squatters rights comes from medieval England, when only land that was occupied or being used was taxed. Wealthy land owners would allow big swaths of land to go fallow & overgrown to avoid paying taxes. In order to collect more taxes the King allowed squatters who moved onto this land & farmed it to claim ownership as long as they paid the taxes & were in continuous occupation for a period of time, which varied from 5-20 years. Squatters rights were written into American laws during the Westward Expansion. Unfortunately what’s happening today with criminals breaking into people’s houses & moving in without the owners knowledge has nothing to do with the original idea developed in England. The houses they’re stealing aren’t really abandoned & the owners are paying taxes on the property. When the cops show up the squatters claim they’re legal tenants (they often show a fake lease) & the property owner is a mean landlord trying to illegally evict them. The cops don’t know who to believe so they tell the property owner to take the matter to civil court.

Americans are stupid

State rights. Constitution says its State jurisdiction, so your State government has to take care of it. Also, squatting is a Constitutional right that goes back to colonial times. These laws might be overturned. Might need a Constitutional amendment to overturn it.

U.S. legislators will do absolutely nothing to help until it happens to them. And then, they may only do enough to resolve their own problem. If they perceive no gain for themselves, they seldom bother with the problem. They aren't looking out for you!

They are unhoused 😂😂😂

​@soulscanner66 and keep in mind, changing the constitution in any way opens ot up to change in many ways. Second ammendment, goodbye and good riddance. You CuckCons are no smarter than ShotLibs. Both think then others are brainwashed and ignorant. Both are correct.

Why isn't this burglary ?

The Peoples Republic Of California (PRC) needs to revamp all the state laws.

Police ARE THE CRIMINALS.

Agreed.

Where do I sign

SHe was a total moron for not knowing about squatters to begin with. Does she not watch the news?

This is what all states need, back in the day, police would literally get them out and moving on out of town, maybe we need harsher treatment of squatters, it is well known that they plan this act.

For real

Exactly, because some people really believe they have a legitimate lease, because a scammer "rented" the house and took money for it, and gave them a fake lease. If someone is too quick to give a lease, it's suspicious. Most legit leases take a while to approve the new tenant, because they want to make sure the tenant will be able to pay rent and won't trash the property and run off.

They did say it was a misdemeanor. But it SHOULD be a felony. Isn't theft over $1,000 a felony in most states?

Id be happier if everyone could find adequate housing, each for their own.

@@angeladansie4378I think it’s $750 in Florida

@@XetaXones well Airbnb has caused many people to be left homeless when their leases expired,as the owners turned it into an Airbnb ,whole blocks of flats are now being used as Airbnb and is causing a shortage of flats in some states, the video is here on youtube showing this, in Paris its now the same with the Olympics coming up,, was watching a few hours ago a piece of video on France24 how people are being told to vacate their flats when leases are up, young college students are now being the hardest hit by this,

England's politicians have destroyed the nation. Two hundred years from now a small percentage of Brits living in a Muslim nation. Your major cities are already lost.

This republican congress can do nothing. 🤣 Besides, it's a states issue for now.

@@philpalmer4877 You are Wrong! If Congress stopped playing political games they could make this a FEDERAL law!

@@philpalmer4877 this is clearly a problem that existed for a long time - NOT an issue of the current congress

​@@sangeet9100But the current House is incompetent and you can't deny that.

How come you can't do the same and squat back in your own home?

Omg, life really kicked her down 😭. Are they gone now?

Agreed. The laws exist for a reason, but they do need to be brought up to speed to expedite safely removing unlawful occupants. ESPECIALLY when it is clear they do not belong there.

There's no reason for the law. They must get money somehow from it. Lawyers from law abiding citizens. They have to pay the court costs. Squatters have no money. They make the law-abiding citizens give their money, while they give freely to the criminals.

@@BlueLuna5 That's not true. The law exists because it has a basis in English Commonlaw, and it was also used as Americans settled westward. The issue with the law is that it's largely based on societal norms from 200 years ago and doesn't account for those that deliberately seek loopholes in the system.

Dont expect anything to get done with the current administration. They dont give a damn about US citizens...which is so funny because we pay them. Except when youre funnelling money with china, russia and ukraine

Not really. If a property is just sitting there unoccupied, the laws have allowed people to take over for hundreds of years. It actually SHOULD bring a penalty on the owners if they just buy property and hold it unoccupied as a way to artificially pump up the price of other properties they might own.

LOL. If a property is sitting, unoccupied, it is for the owner to decide next steps. Get Fked liberal SJW @@omi_god

​@@omi_godOnly there have been cases of families going on vacation for two weeks and coming back to their home being overtaken.

@@omi_god Really? So if I go on vacation for 2 weeks and I come home to squatters I should be penalized?

​you can't be this dumb. Are you really trying to justify something so absurd? @omi_god

Well, it is, and if someone comes along who is in charge of the property, they can have people removed. The difference is, we are not criminalizing being homeless, and there has to be an option for people who become homeless. And right now, housing the homeless should be your priority, not complaining about whether or not they're breaking the law by using a property that isn't being used.

@@lepayen while I agree we need to do better with the homelessness issue however there is a problem with squatting. These aren’t simply emptied abandoned houses and these aren’t simply homeless people seeking shelter. Illegally entering, living in someone’s house isn’t a solution to the problem you stating anyhow and it sure as hell shouldn’t take a home owner days/months to remove them. Breaking and entering has always been illegal, right? I also feel if this was a “homeless” person would leave the property when found/confronted. There is also the very real problem of vandalism. Then there’s the issue of possibly causing the homeowner to also become homeless. What then?

@@mmdaa4 You don't seem to understand. You're acting like they're breaking into houses people live in and are taking over, they're not. They are squatting in abandoned properties. We aren't talking about break and enter, or properties that people live in before the squatters come along. we're talking about people using unused properties, trying to survive. That's what squatting is... It isn't what you seem to think it is. Get it straight: Squatting is when someone who doesn't have a home, takes over a property that isn't being used. Squatting is not robbing someone else of their home, like you seem to be assuming. Squatting doesn't cause someone else to become homeless. The properties squatters use are not being lived in by anyone and aren't being used or taken care of by anyone. Squatters aren't depriving anyone of anything. Try being homeless for a month or two, with no money, no place to go, having to dig in the trash for food, and having to find places to sleep. I guarantee you will look at the many abandoned houses and other buildings and think "I'd love to sleep in there".

​@@lepayenmf please I've been homeless and I can survive fine this is unacceptable to think anybody can just go into a house and claim it.... but me being a homeless american I'll get arrested beat and shot over that fck u bro this is warfare

@@lepayen only biden democrat morons think squatting and stealing from other is ok, eff such criminal promoting filth as lepayen

Yes. I was about to say if this happened to me I'm pulling up with a whole crew and some weapons

Could be a lucrative business........Squatter Removal Inc

@@flowerdoyle3749There is actually a company that does this.

Yes, I saw a special on lady who owned a home and a female squatter moved in and took over. The owner signed a lease with a team of security guards who moved in took over. Squatter moved out when big hairy guys shared her bathroom with her.

Who u gonna call.. S.Q.U A.T. busters 😂❤

@@ja-mez5102 Isn't that what she was trying to do when the pigs told her that if she tries to go back into her own home again they will arrest her?

@@ja-mez5102 1:44

Theyre the one who allows it but if it was them the squatters would be evicted the next day and if there damages trust me theyll find a way to overdo their charges

Probably need to squat on their property. Let’s see how fast we get new legislation.

How is this even possible? Desantis set a precedent!

Federal government is too big government plus California won't go for it this derailing it for everyone. Have your state government do this. Should be quicker. A key point of the constitution is that states have more power to make laws than feds. Feds are only to make laws on military, some taxes, money printing and oh yeah, the border.

There are more squatter votes than home owner votes.

They need to make the law only apply to individuals. Investment companies should not be owning 100 empty houses.

​@grandmaida7819 you people will find fault in everything. Miserable

​@@ewe392/ If an investment company wants 100 houses with zero profit then let them

@@BobBob-ms9gt They already do that. Huge investment companies own the world, and they make their own money from nothing. They buy up real estate, hoarding empty neighborhoods. They get to control how profitable the housing market is, in times when everyone is needing to buy a home. Residents are forced to rent, they turn most of their properties into rentals run by giant companies who do not care about screwing renters over. They get full control and are able to charge top dollar. They are making their money.

Make sure you don't vote Democrat then. Republicans aren't much better, but at least they don't actively help criminals like democrats. Do you see how easy they can fix it? Think about the border. Why so we have an illegal immigration/criminal/ human trafficking problem?

And trash the hell out of it too.

Democrats want criminals to just be able to do what they want

Because squatters rights laws say it is not grand theft. They are not claiming the property is theirs. They are taking advantage of the rights the law affords them with respect to the occupation of vacant properties.

Because they didn't steal anything. They're not taking your home somewhere. It's a house, not a car. You don't squat a car. Different concept requires different laws and regulations.

@@bobmcbobbington9220by that what if a person decided to sit in your car… for as long as they want?

Privacy laws. In order to use someone's face in a commercial program on TV, you have to acquire the right to do so.

@@omi_god well we need to change that law as well

From who? ​@@omi_god

@@camallen1895 Nope. Privacy rights are important, as is the right to control your own image. The law should remain as it is. You have no legal interest in seeing these peoples' faces.

@@omi_godnot if it is done on public property, they can stand on the sidewalk and film freely

U progressives wanted this. Now u mad??? Smh

2 psychopathic parents steal your FORESKIN and they should get arrested

@@jonnyfendi2003when did squatters rights first start?

@@KillTheCupcakes Back in the times when people abandoned farmland. If you lived and improved the land, you could get a deed. It took years. In NYC, it takes 30 days and no improvement needed.

you can rent a home not a car

Send them to Whoopi Goldsburgh house.

Because it has to be given time for the police officers to be caught up in the new law and the squatters time to leave the premises. Plus also not to mention any court cases that maybe taking place at this time.

Right?! They have a right to privacy? It is my property. What about my privacy. This is just ridiculous. Thank you Florida.

Awesome.

Police told me you’re not allowed to remove anything off the property even if you bought it. That he’ll arrest me 😢

​@@ms.rolltide256Don't involve police

​@@ms.rolltide256You're not allowed to remove things, change the locks or even stop the utilities. The OP would've been actually arrested if he tried to carry out his threat, so he might just be spinning a yarn. I just found out about the whole squatter issue and I couldn't believe that people could basically steal your house and the homeowner is basically legally powerless. Best way to remove the squatter under the old law would probably be to wait till the squatter leaves for work or to run errands and then you move into the house and squat your own home. Out squat the squatter lol.

​@@mikepatton8691I wonder if that would work! 😂

Exactly!!!

YES YES YES!!!

Yup!!

Funny, if I try to squat in a hotel room, a storage unit or in a pet daycare facility, I would be removed for criminal trespassing.

It is called No country for old man now. It is pretty effed up

Oh my God! Wake up already! 'You will have nothing and you will be happy" is it ringing a bell to you yet?!

People want liberalism, here it is.

It’s called pandering to change the voter base. We’re discards in America now. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Seriously? Wake up already! 'You will have nothing and you will be happy" is it ringing a bell to you yet?!

thats what criminals do.

they are not called entitled liberal biden morons for nothing

Very sick indeed.

Exactly, it just doesn't make sense to me at all. Or how is what they're doing not considered breaking & entering?

Scam law allow them to do so vote put in new law protected rights owner

todays policing is mostly about protecting business.

Or arrest someone inside a public building for trespassing.

Cops have no way of knowing who is or who isn't a tenant, that's the thing. Leases can be falsified, papers forged, etc. That's often why this goes to court, where ownership *can* be proven. I agree that this is actually a sensible law by DeSantis, as it shouldn't take months to remove squatters swiftly and safely for all parties involved, especially when it is glaringly obvious that somebody is not a lawful occupant. At the same time, the laws exist to keep folks from just taking matters into their own hands and escalating a situation needlessly and also to protect the rights of legitimate tenants, even if they're running behind on their rent.

right but that's the problem. The police officer has no idea whether or not its fraud, that's why it has to go to civil court.

It's a loophole in residency law that has needed closing for awhile. Those laws exist to protect occupants and to keep folks from just taking the law into their own hands, but it was by far being exploited well outside its intended scope.

@@sodasaintcommentaries4054 its not just a loophole. The problem is, police officers literally no not know who is lying vs who is telling the truth. What if the tenants were actual legitimate tenants and the landlord was trying to illegaly evict?

@@chickenceiling I don’t disagree; it’s a nuanced subject for sure. I was speaking more generally of cases where it is exceedingly clear that the occupants are there unlawfully.

It IS illegal, it's just not the type of illegal that a cop, for instance, can mitigate. You guys didn't watch the video.

Agreed! The state put in the law and they are liable

@@Kanti12311 get real if that was the case, they would have to do that for every single home and you can’t contest a lot that was put into law prior to your abolishment of the law. I hate to say it like this, but she should be happy that the law is passed, and at this point, the person who squatted in our house is the person liable to pay back for all of the damages. The state has nothing to do with what happened to her property

The state ? No. We aint communist china and we shouldnt pay for the slow brain.

Exactly, calling them squatters is dumbing down the problem, so that it doesn't seem as bad. They need to be called what they truly are.

my guess is she doesn't have proof that they broke in? Did she have a security system in place? If someone fakes a lease, you need to go to court to prove that is is fraud. A police officer cannot determine who is telling the truth or not.

@@chickenceiling Breaking and entering generally requires an occupant in a house (due to the extra danger of safety). Squatting also has some rights, the reason being that government really don't like houses to sit vacant. There is a strong political backlash against investment properties, they tend to drive up housing prices, and there is even greater backlash against investment homes that sit vacant. Government views it as a waste of resources (yes, it is your resource, but they still hate it when you waste the home by keeping it vacant). For example, California is going to start taxing you if you keep your home vacant, if someone squats in your home, it can actually save you some tax dollars.

The way you handle this is you make it look like a breaking and entering. Go at night but not alone and not unarmed. Break into the house, and then call the cops. Tell the cops you heard a crashing noise and your and your family woke up to find these people in your house. Show them the broken door/window. Now it's breaking and entering, not a squatter's right issue. Helps if you have a neighbor show up to vouch for you.

@@user-be8nj1xu2y House is vacant, breaking and entering requires someone to be living there. If the squatter already has photos and other items put up. It will end up you being the one who broke in.

@@user-be8nj1xu2y yeah don't do this unless you want to go to jail lol

Thank you, professor.

No it shouldn't. People should not be allowed to own multiple homes. That's the real cause of this problem.

​@@scottandrews947 that is not the problem. The vast majority of people do not. That is a different issue that requires nuance

@@cheekzt2l It definitely is the cause. The people in this video don't live in these homes. If they did, squatters wouldn't have been able to set up shop there. These people are hoarding vacant houses during a housing crisis. THAT should be illegal.

@@scottandrews947 This is stupid. What about people who go on a vacation and come back to see squatters in their home? Should people not take a two week vacation anymore either?

Welcome to the greatest country in the world 😂😂

There is actually historical precedent for it, and it was part of how we settled this country. You found a piece of land and you squatted on it and it was yours However, it is time these laws be changed. You should’ve learned this in history.

@@Po0pypoopy you do understand the historical context for this? It is certainly past time to change the law, but it was there for a reason.

@@AGalacticMerger That and it also protects all parties involved from hot-heads that will escalate the situation into something it doesn't need to be. Doesn't matter if they're squatters or not; if you try and force somebody out using a weapon without there being an explicit threat to your life or physical well-being, you absolutely *will* be charged for it. Not to mention, if a weapon does get involved... there's no undoing somebody being shot.

@@AGalacticMerger wdym

If I was a cop I would absolutely refuse to arrest a homeowner just trying to get an invader out of their home.

With the law as it was written prior to this, you HAD to go through the courts to get squatters evicted, but that could take months or even years to do. But even with this law change, there are still certain ways you have to go about it. Even if you have squatters on your property, you're not allowed to use force against them unless there is an immediate threat to your life and your person. You will 100% catch criminal charges if you were to try and chase squatters out with a baseball bat, for example.

@@AGalacticMergeryou must be a squatter

Amurika

Murca

Unfortunately, now, breaking & entering is only a misdemeanor that doesn’t get prosecuted in court so the police don’t even waste their time with arrests. Crazy.

Like the police said : There's little they can do....... That's like on basically everything. They have been neutered

It helps to understand the history, wording and nuances in law. It's never just black and white.

B&E is only a crime if you're caught in the act. Once someone lives on a property for 30 days (state laws vary) they become a *resident* and must be evicted through the courts. The police can't arrest. Be careful who you let stay in your house for a month or so. There are cases of "roommates' pulling this stunt on their own friends and family.

Good idea, but good luck collecting. Those who squat in houses are wastoids

💯‼️

Giving right to criminal is the trend currently

@@katsukanna9322 going on 4 years now

I share your same thoughts.

👍

Got that right!

You dont need to. Just rent a lease to some strong men and have the men break the locks to move in. Squatters rights protects squatters from owners, but not from other tenants.

In the old day, the Mafia had a different way of handling these matters. That's how they came to be - to protect those those the Police wouldn't.

yep, go play some baseball :)

@@AMLagonda It's Homerun Time!! Yippie!!

​@@AGalacticMerger the law should favour property owners by default let the squatter go to court

why is not considered trespassing by the policy. If come home to my apt and people have broken into it and are eating my food, sleeping in my bed etc I need to go to court to kick them out, yet since it's my place i of course could stay in my own bed? @@AGalacticMerger

Landlords kept creating homeless people on some BS. That's how. Let's check the pendulum but not swing it back too far

It was a law that was enacted during the turn of the last century. More specifically a few years after the civil war.

Well you see, it all started back in the mid 1860s…….

Same reason Trump was still allowed to run for President.

No squatters laws come from medieval europe. The law was made because in those days, people would leave cities and build homes on vacant land.

😂

What did you say to them to make them leave quickly?

@@AGalacticMerger Hey, believe what y'all want junior, it's your brain...... or is it?

@@Hoovie9596 I can't tell y'all. But they were terrified.

@@BashoStrikes it’s cool. Still I’d love to know.

Its odd you say it as “homeowner’s house” and not just simply “their home”

Burglars need to just change the locks and steal all the property at their leisure

Democrats laws 💙

@@Hushh_2024 no theyre archaic realty laws. Interesting theyll change it to benefit the landbarons but not the serfs. They wont change the laws to prevent parasitic rental practices

Fake news ABC is why faces are not shown. Try to keep up.

Civil liability. Also: all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. As such, to avoid accidentally prejudicing a jury, their faces are blurred. Granted it doesn't change the fact that they're squatting, but they deserve a fair day in court like we all do.

innocent until proven guilty. Some of these people paid real money to the fake owner, they dont know he had no right to rent the property

@@MrKongatthegates This exactly. Some of these folks are victims of scammers and aren't necessarily malicious.

Because it's racist.