Questions for Trinitarians 1. The Father has a name, the Son has a name. What is the name of the Holy Spirit? 2. In Paul’s epistles, why did he leave out salutations to the Holy Spirit? 3. Why is there no conversation recorded between the Father and the Holy Spirit or the Son and the Holy Spirit? 4. Isaiah 45:21, why is the Holy Spirit not mentioned in this verse? 5. Isaiah 57:15, the Father dwells only with the Son? 6. Matt 28:18-20 - Jesus commanded his disciples to baptise in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. However, his disciples in the book of Acts only baptise in Jesus name. Why? 7. Revelation 22:1, why is there a seat for Jesus but no seat for the Holy Spirit at the Great White Throne? If the Father is the Son and vice versa, why is there a need for separate thrones? 8. Why John 1:1 does not mention the Holy Spirit? 9. Why was 1John 5:7 only added in AD325? This verse is not found in scriptures before that time. 10. John 5:30, John 6:38, If the Son is also the Father, why would there be 2 wills? 11. John 10:30, why is the Holy Spirit not mentioned? 12. Revelation 5:7, why would God hand the book to Himself? 13. Revelation 11:15, why only mention Lord and Christ but not the Holy Ghost? 14. John 10:30, why Jesus did not include the Holy Spirit? 15. 1Cor 3:23, Christ belongs to God or Christ is God? 16. 2John 1:3, why John’s salutation also omit the Holy Spirit?

Luke 9:35 "This is My Son, My Chosen One; listen to Him!"

Excellent debate-will watch again and again; thought provoking; had to pull out my Bible, read it and think about these issues; ordered a few books from the panelist as well. Any time spent in the Study of the Word is excellent even if we have to agree to disagree.

Mark 10:18 ““Why do you call Me good?” Jesus replied. “No one is good except God alone.” ‭

What a beautiful and calm discussion! I would love to see more of these!

John 12:49. Everything that Jesús said or did was given by his Father. Is clear. Deutheronomy 6:4 God is only one!!!!

For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; 4Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. 5For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; 6Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.

Can you be saved if you deny the trinity. Only god can decide. I love that great respect

I would have loved to have heard from both sides. Michael Brown and James White were nothing less than rude the entire time. They continually interrupted and would not let the other two talk. Talking over and mocking the other two men. Notice the difference in the fruits of the two sides.. Test the spirits… Anthony Buzzard and the Jewish man were rarely even allowed to finish a thought or sentence. The moderator should have done a better job of stopping that.

It's worth noting how the trinitarian side keeps using the words explicit and clear, explicitly clear to support Jesus being God in scripture. They need to learn English and the definitions these words. An explicitly clear statement would be anywhere in the OT or NT saying "Jesus is God, God is Jesus." This doesnt exist. Inference is placed upon the scripture to support a doctrine devised be a Roman empire to promote Christianity as the Roman religion based on a non biblical view. 1700 years later this is still the case in all of Christianity regardless of denomination and for some unknown reason without question.

John 17:3 " This is eternal life: that they may know You, the only true God, and the One You have sent-Jesus Christ."

The trinitarians keep saying they don’t believe in three Gods but maintain that God is 3 distinct persons 🤦🏾‍♂️ they are so blind it’s scary…

The closing remark of Joseph Good should be the way of every believer should go.

Great debate. I just wonder when they say Jesus was part human part god in the flesh how could his sacrifice be equal. Adam(totally human) brought sin & death Jesus cancelled this by dying for us. Surely it should be like for like to balance the divine scales of justice? So Jesus cant be God?

The gentleman in the yarmulke has been a liability in this conversation for the most part… the British gentleman has the best argument/defense for his position.

This idea that God "pitching his tent" in a fleshly body, ala the tabernacle, does not make you Yahweh. Our bodies are the temple of the Holy Spirit of God(1 Cor 6:19). Do we as Christians claim to be Yahweh? No!

Debate on the Trinity? Thus, proving that the Trinity has no support in the Bible. No First Century Christian has any trouble in knowing who God is and who Jesus is (cf John 17:3).

@ 25:50 “did his spirit die?” Seriously? 🤦🏾‍♂️ so then if his spirit didn’t die (because a spirit doesn’t die) equals what? Did Jesus the son of God NOT die for our sins? Was he NOT raised from the dead? Trinitarians always try this nonsense. The scriptures clearly state that Jesus died, we do understand the definition of “die” don’t we?

@ 54:00 scripture doesn’t say he’s the fullness of the godhead in bodily form, it says “in him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily”… pay attention to what these men are saying, this is how they “deceive and are deceived”.

Your videos are really engaging!

I didn't know that George Costansa was a debate moderator.

@ 53:30 the scriptures never said the Word “became flesh” it says the Word was “Made Flesh”

Dr Brown clearly forgot that Jesus is the son of god and belittles Jesus from the Unitarian position

They keep saying "the Triune God". ? Where does the bible say triune God? Or "man God" Or "God the son" Trinity is doctrine of men. It's called a Theory, not fact. 📖

@ 50:00 Trinitarians always quote the scriptures but then tells you it means something other than what it says… 🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️ deception is so real…

Jesus did not have to be God to atone for our sins. He had to be a new Adam to atone for our sins and bring about the new creation. Adam didn't have to be God to affect all man, why does Jesus? Scripture itself does not say that Jesus had to be God to pay for our sins. It does say that he was the last Adam, the first fruit from the dead, the beginning of the new creation

This was excellent

The problem of Muslim and Jews the concept of God power is limited, it is impossible for God send his son as a man

The trinitarian gentleman keep straw-manning the unitarian presentation by calling Jesus "merely a man". Jesus was a totally unique man, the son of God, not God himself

The discussion was good but the debate system is not good... They couldn't complete even what they say... None of the argument was ended properly

20:00 so if God manifested him in the burning bush is the bush God?

When the Unitarians bring up a good point or verse, the Trinitarians divert and completely switch to other passages completely flipping the script . This makes the Trinitarians appear as “victorious” , but this isn’t the case. When conversing with Trinitarians , it is crucial to make stay on point.

It’s clear that a lot of people in this comment section would benefit from watching both part 1 and 2 together consecutively

@ 21:38 James white couldn’t answer that question…

Even the title misrepresented the Biblical Unitarian position. Biblical Unitarians believe Christ was the The Son of God. They don’t believe Son of God also means God.

Awesome debate

Any trinitarian should be ashamed of themselves.......scripture is clear....Jesus is the son of God.

💥 *MICHAEL AND WHITE INTERRUPTED ALOT. AND THE MODERATOR WATCHED ON.*

These guys are talking past each other

Bible is clear He is God alone no God beside him...He has son Jesus...no trinity...that is man made doctrine..too many people in the old testament never knew or teach a trinity doctrine but believe in one God none beside him.

Buzzard and Goode dont get to finish their sentences before they get intrupted by Brown and White. Is that what is called a debate? This was cleary in ffavor for the Trinitarian side.

Is this Sam Shamoun in 1:02:45?

Why can't Trinitarians hear what Jesus is saying?

God is the Father alone. Do not deceive yourself and fall into the Trinitarian lies by having a reprobate mind.

The gentleman with the exceptional stache… am I tripping or does he come off as a bit of a troll?

I think Dr. Buzzard made the best argument…

@ 1:18:30 the scriptures do not teach three persons though, these guys just subtly inject these falsehoods real quick… “as the scriptures teach” smh 🤦🏾‍♂️ this is scary No, the real question is “does the scriptures teach three Devine/distinct persons sharing the being of God” or does it teach that God is himself, and no one else? I don’t respect these double talks that the trinitarian side uses, I notice that with some trinitarians when they converse with someone that doesn’t believe in their doctrine.

17:3 would be enuf, no more word to say...

I respect buzzard and I absolutely agreed with him

Jesus was a prophet sent by GOD. Jesus never claimed to be GOD himself.

Jesus is not the Creator. His father Yahweh is the creator. Jesus is the Son of God and not God father himself. They are two different persons. But Jesus the Prince is "raised" ( crowned ) as God (King) upon his great sacrifice and resurrection . all authorities and power of his father , the creator, are transferred to Jesus. Jesus becomes the God (King) whereas his God father remains the Creator. The father is still greater than the son. Only through Jesus can anyone be saved. Jesus is the mediator who rule over mankind now. He is our only one God! And only believing in the name of the Father and Son can anyone be saved. If you don't believe that the Father had sent his only Son Jesus to save the world, you already are not believing in them - the two different holy persons. Jesus has declared over a hundred times that He is the son doing the works for his father. And God Father Yahweh himself had also declared many times that He is the Father of Jesus! Bothe God Father and Jesus do not need to disguise themselves, tell lies, play acting and mocking themselves all over the Bible! Perfect and holy as heavenly righteous spirits they hated lies. Why can't people believing in their simple words but cherry picks jig saw parcels to establish a blasphemy trinity theory?

If we are only honest and truthful in our reading of our Bible, Jesus is only the Son of God and the Christ of God, not God,. LUKE 1:35; MATTHEW 16:15,16; JOHN 20:31; 1JOHN 5:1,5; ACTS 9:20,22; ACTS 17:3; ACTS 18:5,28; JOHN 11:27; JOHN 10:36; JOHN 17:3; 1 CORINTHIANS 8:5,6; 1 TIMOTHY 2:5. . All Bible characters only IDENTIFIED Jesus as the SON OF GOD and the CHRIST OF GOD, NOBODY PROMOTED JESUS AS GOD. JOHN 13:13. . Only those who read what is written by these people insist that Jesus is God, but the writer themselves DO NOT understood it the way the READERS understood what they wrote.

Lol Jeff Durban 🤣😂😅 he and James white are friends … I don’t know if this was planned or coincidence b cause he and James white would go on to join forces in another debate years later, it would be a full bearded Durban though…

Brown wont let them speak.

Look how the trinitarians try to make a joke of the other two men. This is how the devil deceives

Brown always gets his ego in the way

John 5:26 Jesús a his Father have separate lives.

And they outright lie 🥴 how can Mr. Brown say the opposing side haven’t refuted anything? They’ve literally been refuting the whole time with the exception of Mr. Good at times. (I said before “he’s a liability in this debate”) these ( *Mr. Brown especially) trinitarian guys just say things.

@shamounian i didnt know white was a trinitarian 😂

Brown has no manners

Solid debate

James white and his colleague contradict themselves a number of times; they’re trinitarians but even the moderator points out there contradiction @ 51:38 …

Brother Joseph Good became a Trinitarian during the debate 😅

The Giraldo looking guy is so smug. Both of the trinitarians just bulldoze that one guy, hardly let him finish a thought.

James white is always assuming

7:20 Brown is simply unfair and a bit of a bully here. Always arrogant and having ego as god

Believe in Jesus the Christ the son of God.

Very interesting debate. Enjoyed it allot. Both teams had good points, but something that I particularly enjoyed hearing from the Unitarian's side, was the that they made their without being abstract and considered the culture and lifestyle of author, the audience of that author and the time that it was written. Where the Trinitarians tried to prove their point with abstract ideas that allows for so many contradictions and confusion. Both parties however, set a very good examples to what type of questions we should be asking. When you ask a good Rabbi a question, he often replies with another question, meaning that in most cases it's not about the answers we want, but the questions we want answered

4 EXTRAORDINARILY INTELLIGENT MEN... Awesome debate...learned a lot.

Hahah it totally shocked me to see Jeff Durbin in this video at 59 mins. He is a great Christian apologist when it comes to debating Mormons.

It was pretty clearly understood by EVERY single one of Jesus's disciples that he was the Messiah. And reaffirmed by Paul of Tarsus, whom God appeared to.

The man who asked about agency needs to read Exodus 23:20 20 Behold, I send an Angel before thee, to keep thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared. 21 Beware of him, and obey his voice, provoke him not; for he will not pardon your transgressions: for my name is in him. 22 But if thou shalt indeed obey his voice, and do all that I speak; then I will be an enemy unto thine enemies, and an adversary unto thine adversaries. 23 For mine Angel shall go before thee, and bring thee in unto the Amorites, and the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Canaanites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites: and I will cut them off. We see there God send and angel as being his agent. That angels was in different position than other angels, because God sent and anointed Him specially, His name was in this angel.

This may topically be true assuming that all Jesus did was give His life for remission of sin for all who come to Him in faith. Jesus did so much more. He sent the Holy Spirit. Jesus is our High Priest in heaven always interceding for us to the Father. Jesus revealed the Father for all practical purposes face to face. No one knows God but the Son and He who he chooses to reveal Him. Having seen Jesus, we see the Father. Jesus is the author and finisher of our faith.

Brown and White are completely missing what Christ was redeeming with his sacrifice. Christ was redeeming Adam who was only a man. Though he was perfect, Adam was still only a man. If Adam had hadn't of sinned, all of mankind would be perfect. If a perfect man was able to keep us in perfection, logically a perfect man is all that's needed to bring us back into perfection.

great debate,,i learned a lot..only GOD knows and will explain when JESUS coming back,,GOD talked to the prophets in old testaments fragmentacaly,,but HE show HIS fullnes in JESUS CHRIST,,maybe we still cannot understand for the things that only for GOD,but one thing that will be sure we will have our salvation thru CHRIST,,evrythings about this debate will be settled when JESUS return..GOD bless you all...

I have noticed how in Debates non-Trinitarians appeal to other things OTHER than Scripture...they dont REFUTE certain scriptures..they jump around or dont answer...The Trinitarians address each scripture,as we all should and bow our hearts to the Total Scope Of God`s Word.On the Walter Martin Debate Robert Sabin did the same thing..and even said ther was no need to go to the greek.If its TRUTH we are looking for lets look at ALL in the original language.God bless

I still think it's preposterous to think that G-d is a man when in Numbers 23:19 "God is not a man, that he should lie, nor a son of man, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?" It would be a lie and a change of the mind for Him then to incarnate, to renege on His eternal word. Also, the "I am He" is so reminiscent of Dvekut in Jewish mysticical thought/conception/practice. Also Bitul Hayesh, "Not my will but Thy will be done."

Wow!! The trinitarians clearly show through scripture that Jesus is truly God in the flesh! Mr. Buzzard appealed to "quantitative" evidence that God is one, which we believe, and admits Jesus is called at least once. If the bible says it once, IT'S TRUE! Thank for the post!

By permeation of everything, it means that the fact that God is omnipresent and omni-potent, means that ultimately, everything in the universe and beyond can be seen as a part of God, however it is only the entirety of his greatness that is God. A man is not God, a star is not God, and a galaxy is not God. They are within God, but calling them God is reducing God to a contained physical object lesser than all and eternity.

Isaiah prophecied that God would be the Messiah....Isaiah 40

The God of the Old Testament is an unlimited creator who permeates all of existence with his endless power and greatness. He is not limited by simple containers of the flesh. Putting any significant limitation on God is blasphemy by the views of the Old Testament. God is not a man in the same vein that he is not a burning bush. Jesus' whole rhetoric about being part of the father was just a re-iteration of the mystical view that God's essence permeates everything.

Beyond this, one must look at what the entirety of God, the unlimited creator who permeates every inch of space, time, and beyond, tells us about his nature through his law and prophets. Numbers 23:19 and Samuel 15:29 tell us without a doubt that the glory of God will never be contained within the flesh of a singular man. Jesus may be a prophet, may be the moshiach, and/or may be the greatest man or agent of God that ever exists and/or existed, but he is lesser than the

He also said believers are one IN THE SAME MANNER that the Father and the Son are [John 17.21f.] ; )

yeshua esta sentado a la diestra del padre , quien esta sentado a la siniestra ? el espiritu santo ? y si yeshua es d-ios porque no esta sentado en el trono ? y porque tubo que ser ungido ( mashiaj) y si fue ungido lo tubo que ungir alguien superioir a el ( el padre ) cualquiera que escuche a estos trinitarios, entienda que ellos estan distorcionando la palabra de el eterno !!! YHVH es uno !!! yeshua es el santo mashiaj , bendito sea su nombre

Worthy is Jesus of praise. The Lord God Almighty, The Father, Creator of All Things, is more than deserving of not only praise, but Worship. The words praise and worship have different meanings. Praise Jesus, Worship the Father.

The problem with this debate is that the trinity has approx 2,000 years of support while the Catholic Church killed anyone believing otherwise and burned any counter religious texts that may have provided additional support. What really should be argued is the Nicene Creed and the point of Jesus' and God's equality as there is obviously a direct Hierarchy in the Bible which the Nicene Creed doesn't support or address. Jesus in man form can't be any less a God according to the creed.

Wow ! 18:46 all texts even Alexandrius is privy to the Trinity. Even the Alexandrian false text claims Trinity! Amazing - I did not know this. Fantastic. It is one of the uknown and unresearched questions I have had, among thousands, for many years.

At one time in my life... (an hour ago)... I thought I was brilliant in biblical Greek. Then after watching White, I no longer think that. loool

Amen. He has sent me his paper for about 30 years-for free.

Really wonderful debate....

@djvdiddy well the Bible says TWICE that Moses is God [Ex 4.16; 7.1] so it must be DOUBLY true! :P

*Excuse the errors in spelling and grammar.

The three WHO'S in one WHAT question was not answered. Here is the part of the video. Dr. James White. 23:00 minute mark. "The being of God, and i am talking about the persons that share that one being. That being is personal but not a person", your turning that into some kind of impersonal object like a rock. Sir Anthony Buz. "You are calling that WHAT?" The question unanswered is The Being being One WHAT? It is clearly not a HE. My answer to the three WHO'S in one WHAT question, leads to somethng entirely different WHAT. The vision of Ezekielm each cherubim have four faces, that of a man, a lion, an ox and an eagle.

A thought...Who at that table paints a bigger picture of who God is? Who makes the picture of who he is, smaller? Any teacher that diminishes God has a slight problem here...

Beyond this, Jesus himself dictates to us God's greatest commandments. In Mark 12:29, Jesus explicitly says that the Shema, which is the ultimate statement of the oneness and uniqueness of God, is the most important commandment. This was in line with the Pharisaic philosophers of the time and all of the Hebrews before then. Ultimately, it is a comment consistent with the entirety of the Torah and the word of God. God is infinite and he is one. He isn't 3 limited containers with specific powers.

Why is John 1:18 misquoted, using the ISV? "No one has ever seen God. The unique God, who is close to the Father's side, has revealed him." SIDE is not in this verse; look at the Greek: "No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him." Jn 14:7 "If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; from now on you know Him, and have seen Him." The LORD is One = Echad (as in one [echad] rib from Adam's side - Gen 2:21).

I think I understand what you are saying. Also, I think that Trinitarian doctrine attempts to create another Jesus. That is the danger. If another Jesus then, one may believe on the wrong Jesus and miss out on salvation.

interesting concept

21:12 + made me laugh. When the opponent said "I agree with that" Dr. White seemed to have deflated, like, "He agrees!? I'm disappointed! We're supposed to be in a DEBATE, not an agreement!" lol Watch his body language.

Part 2 of the debate is equally interesting as part 1. It becomes obvious, that the explanations given so far by the Trinitarian side are not sufficient to explai, or give a model for thinking how the infinite realm of YWHW, Yeshua the Messiah, and the other Spirit of YWHW can be seen as a singular from here on the planet Earth. Dr. James White. 22:00 minute mark. Q. "DO you believe that YWHW essence is limited to time and space"? Ans. Joseph Good. Absolutely not. Q. "Why can't that unlimited essence be shared with three divine persons"? "Because you are assuming that, your assumption in all your interpretations is; THAT's NOT POSSIBLE"! Sir Anthony Buz. "My assumption is, since you describe God as one WHAT? Let me give your description of God. He is three WHO'S; I want you to be clear about this. Three WHO'S in one WHAT? I do not find the singular muscular pronoun HE, to describe a WHAT? Let's talk about an IT. Be fair, let's talk English, let's talk the language. If HE is going to be three WHO's in one WHAT? Then he is not a HE. Your giving me a HE, and you ask me see it as HE three's". Dr. James White is assuming based on the scripture verses that he quoted, the belief in the Trinity theology. There are many scripture verses that represent dots for logic and reasoning. The debate problem can be resolved by joining the dots with logic and reasoning, or belief and assumption. The singular HE, to describe what? Question by Sir Anthony Buz. Is a logical question. If it is three, then it is wrong to call it a HE. It is something else, at another dimension of time and space. But why would you bother describing a being that exist in a dimension that we have no access to, you can't prove it. It places the task of believing more under strain, without engaging reasoning and logic. Why complicate the object of belief with convoluted doctrines. E.g. “Why can't that unlimited essence be shared with three divine persons”? It makes more sense to describe a being according to the way things are on the planet Earth. One YWHW, one Messiah, and the Spirit of YHWH empowering the redemption for those that believes in the Son of God that is the perfect representation of the Father YWHW. To say the least, then logic and reason is convinced at the personal level that the plan of Salvation is not some crazy sect idea that cannot be explained logically. There are many blind spots to reality, but the reasoning and the use of logic should be encouraged, not disengaged.