If you are a Gentile, you need to keep the 7 Noahide laws.

Keep learning and use your brain.

although I am a Jew my Jewish mother took me to the local Baptist church that had managed to convert her to Christianity because she came from a secular Jewish family. I never fully accepted their teachings because their very own Bible disproved what was believed by the Christians. Eventually in my late fifties I made a very in depth study and found that Christianity was not based ed on fact. Over the last 15 years I have slowly found my way to Judaism helped by the Chabad movement. I am now finally at peace knowing I had found both my spiritual roots and the truth. I would advise you if you are a Jew to follow Judaism if not find a Noahide congregation and join them. I would not recommend converting to Judaism if you are not Jewish but keeping close ties to a Jewish community may be possible.

Thanks so much.@@JRTIGER07

⁠@@ViralChristianityif there was such a thing as without the shadow of doubt then everyone would believe the same thing. But, there is tons of doubt and millions of people believe in different religions or no religion at all. You made a statement about your feelings.

That is awfull reasoning by Tovia and trying to place himself as an expert even tough he has no clue that his lies offebnds God and does not match any biblical truth from old or new testament.All prophets of God even Moses by todays standarts was ileterate and most of them were sheperds and field workers.

@@alenasvarkulys2810: FYI, Rabbi Singer has been studying the original Hebrew scriptures since childhood, and the Christian "NT" for the past 40+ YEARS, so he knows that text FAR BETTER than YOU or your blind guide Pastors, Ministers or Priests. God specifically told us in Deut. 17:8-11 to LISTEN to what the Rabbis teach, since they (and ONLY THEY!!) have been studying the original, ETERNAL (i.e. STILL in effect and binding TODAY - a LIVING document!) Hebrew scriptures, all the way back to Mt. Sinai. Something "Christianity" REFUSED to do, leaving them in profound darkness as to what God ACTUALLY said to us there! You're ignoring one very important fact - the "NT" is NOT scripture that was given to man by God, since NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, therefore anything that comes out of it is false, and irrelevant, including the "Jesus" character, who was already DEAD for at least 20 years by the time the NT was written! Yet they quote him word-for-word - IMPOSSIBLE!! Just try to remember what YOU said yesterday, word-for-word - again, IMPOSSIBLE!! This should be a HUGE red flag to you, as well as to ALL of Christianity! The other thing that should be a HUGE red flag to you and ALL of Christianity, is the fact that when God gave us His Torah on Mt. Sinai, he said it is ETERNAL, and is NOT to be added to or taken away from, yet, that is exactly what Christianity has so arrogantly and blasphemously done! NOBODY has the authority to tell ANYONE that we are "no longer under the Law" - that's GOD'S ETERNAL LAW that the anti-God, hate-filled, blasphemous, arrogant Paul was talking about! You have to ask yourself WHY you would no longer WANT to be "under the Law" of the Creator of the universe! WHO knows better how we should live than HE does?!! The other thing you have to ask yourself is WHY would God give us His Torah, tell us it is ETERNAL, and then, a couple of thousand years later, tell us we no longer have to follow it, but instead follow a MAN-MADE, blasphemous, hate-filled work of fiction that He NEVER gave us!! Do you REALLY believe that God, Creator of the universe, DOESN'T know the meaning of the word "ETERNAL"??!! I suggest you look up the meaning of "ETERNAL" for yourself, since Christians don't seem to realize what that actually means! God's Torah is STILL in force, to this day, and will be to eternity!! You need to think VERY seriously about what I've just said to you, and do some honest research on the origins of Christianity for YOURSELF. You will find, as I did, that it did NOT come from God. If you are TRULY interested in knowing what God ACTUALLY said to us, you won't find it in Christianity - they have never studied the original Hebrew, so they are therefore working in the dark, and have no idea what the Hebrew scriptures ACTUALLY mean and therefore what God ACTUALLY said to us at Sinai. Christianity is biggest HOAX ever perpetrated on mankind and it seeks to destroy God's original words to us - that's why I left it about 20+ yrs. ago, after being a born-again, baptized, Evangelical Baptist Christian and then a 'Messianic' Christian, for 40+ years. PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.​

@@alenasvarkulys2810: NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mr. Sinai (God told us that His words are ETERNAL, i.e. STILL in effect and binding TODAY - a LIVING document!), therefore "Christianity" absolutely DID NOT come from God. PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely DID NOT come from God.

1. God forbids idol worship. 2. Praying to saints or Mary or Jesus who are creations instead of praying only to God who is the creator is idol worship in Judaism and Islam and in some Christian sects. 3. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that the messiah in Tanakh is a human biological descendant of the messiah king David through the messiah king Solomon meaning the messiah is not God and not a Trinity with God. 4. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that the messiah in the Quran is a human who did not descend from the messiah king David because a person who has no biological father inherits no tribe in Judaism. 5. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that in Gospel of John 20:17 Jesus said he did not die on the cross meaning no one sacrificed him and he explains that he is a human and he is not God. 6. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that not all Christians believe that Jesus is God or that Jesus is a Trinity with God.

@@hegagi839 1 Chronicles details genealogy from Levi to the time of the Babylonian exile, listing 22 generations. These are the generations between Levi, son of Jacob, down to the line of the High Priests who served in Solomon's temple until the temple's destruction. The book of Ezra opens with Ezra tracing his own lineage. The genealogy in Ezra is condensed, listing 16 names. Why? 1] Genealogical differences can reflect different emphasis or purpose. Ezra's genealogy focuses on the most significant ancestors in his lineage; those relevant to the period of return from Babylonian exile and the rebuilding of the Temple and to highlight Ezra's priestly legitimacy and authority.

@@hegagi839 2] Our sages knew that not all genealogical records in Tanach included every generation. Sometimes generations were skipped and that a person called "son" can also mean a grandson or a descendant several generations removed. Continuing….

@@hegagi839 3] The sages of the Midrash and other commentaries believed the number of generations in the lists had symbolic meanings. A shorter list would represent a time of limitation or restriction, while a longer list would signify a time of growth or expansion. Each list conveyed a message about the spiritual condition of the Jewish people during that particular period… hope this helps.

So in Genesis - God said, "let us..." who was the "us" he was referring to?

Toni, your DNA is not going to “Save” you 🙄 That’s a xtrian concept 🤪

@@shirleyannelindberg1692 Finding out that I have the BRCA1 gene, knowing my father's family died of cancer, is how I was saved. I had a double mastectomy & hysterectomy within a, paid in full by my insurance carrier. My son's as well have a heads up. I suggest every person to have a DNA test, at least for health reasons. Otherwise, Dr's still only test for cancer if it comes from the mother's side. Mine is from my Jewish father.

@@Tonibolognaaintnophony Good to know you are well, however, it’s all in HaShem’s Hands - NOT The DOCTORS 🙄🙄

Ashkenazi DNA is easier to find and Rabbi Akiva Tatz suggests getting a DNA test to learn about genetic health risks and genealogy issues, especially for couples planning to get married. He explains a lot in his books and lectures. It’s quite nice.

@@Raizel613 Wow, I'll check it out! Thank you so much for that information 🙂

The full verse in Matthew is: _"And Jacob begot Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus who is called Christ"._ So Jacob is definitely the father of Joseph (according to this narrative). However, does "of whom was born" refer to Joseph, or to Mary? The claim is that Joseph was not the biological father (so there is no "begot" in the above), but clearly a child is born by the mother of that child. ... Some people say this indicates that Matthew is giving the genealogy of Mary and Luke is giving the genealogy of Joseph. Others point out that the genealogies work much better (for Jesus) if Matthew is giving the genealogy of *Joseph,* and that the phrase "of whom was born" is merely adding the comment "We're talking about the Joseph who eventually married Mary".

@@mtalk828 - This is extremely unlikely, given that the genealogies are *very* different. It is not like they match up for many generations, and then they disagree on the name of this one guy. As Rabbi Singer correctly notes, they even disagree as to which son of David is in the genealogy.

@@mtalk828 Obviously they aren't.

@@mtalk828 it can't be. Matthew's list consists of 26 names. While that of Luke is 41 and besides this, it's also contradictory.

How can Paul say this !? He saw nothing except the torture he was giving to the followers of Jesus ! 😀

The theme isn't that Jesus healed or the disciples couldn't convey healing powers. The point of the video is that the genealogies don't add up or match. Also much of what Christians are saying using the Hebrew scriptures is contrived and skewed. Just because The Christians had healing power doesn't mean that what is said in the New Testament is correct.

Sony A7CII

@@jeffreyerwin3665I know about Pantera the Roman officer according to tradition the others

​@@jeffreyerwin3665hehe so you want to use the talmud and not the NT. If you are a christian good luck with that lol

@@goldengun9970 I’m not using the Talmud!. To fully Comprehend a book written in 1st century Judea meant for Judeans , one must also understand their culture. The author assumes the reader is familiar with tanakh and Jewish customs.

❤

@zafirjoe18 if you use the nt jesus doesnt have paternal lineage to david. If you use tye Talmud and desperately say the roman soldier with tye roman name might of been a jew and might of had paternal lineage to david instead of the Nt then you have endless other issues accepting the Talmud and denying the gospels. It doesn't save anything for christians even if he was a jew with a line to David

The Christian Bible is NOT Scripture. Christianity is the Last Beast.

A Jew who serves false gods is considered like a gentile in all regards.

​@@enriquemoure7212 In summary...by redefining all of these images, terms, and events outside the context of its usage and purpose within the Jewish nation, you can then convince yourself that all these passages impart legitimacy to a "Jesus." They don't, however. It's like watching a person do contortions with the writings of Douglas and the evening news in America to prove that MLK was the one true President, known as "commander in chief," who was rejected by Americans, and remains a sacrifice for all the world to achieve Nirvana so that we do not have to offer fireworks on fourth of July. That is only a thumbnail of just how absurd the Christian claims are based on how you interpret the passages you mention.

Jews are commanded not to listen to a false prophet in Deuteronomy 13:4.

Even so, Jesus is still the way. Jews and Muslims are still waiting for the Messiah to come but He already came. Some people didn't believe in Him because He was ordinary.

@@HilaryMurray-cp6ys No temple, no Messiah.

@@HilaryMurray-cp6ys: God specifically told us in Deut. 17:8-11 to LISTEN to what the Rabbis teach, since they (and ONLY THEY!!) have been studying the original, ETERNAL (i.e. STILL in effect and binding TODAY - a LIVING document!) Hebrew scriptures, all the way back to Mt. Sinai. Something "Christianity" REFUSED to do, leaving them in profound darkness as to what God ACTUALLY said to us there! You're ignoring one very important fact - the "NT" is NOT scripture that was given to man by God, since NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, therefore anything that comes out of it is false, and irrelevant, including the "Jesus" character, who was already DEAD for at least 20 years by the time the NT was written! Yet they quote him word-for-word - IMPOSSIBLE!! Just try to remember what YOU said yesterday, word-for-word - again, IMPOSSIBLE!! This should be a HUGE red flag to you, as well as to ALL of Christianity! The other thing that should be a HUGE red flag to you and ALL of Christianity, is the fact that when God gave us His Torah on Mt. Sinai, he said it is ETERNAL, and is NOT to be added to or taken away from, yet, that is exactly what Christianity has so arrogantly and blasphemously done! NOBODY has the authority to tell ANYONE that we are "no longer under the Law" - that's GOD'S ETERNAL LAW that the anti-God, hate-filled, blasphemous, arrogant Paul was talking about! You have to ask yourself WHY you would no longer WANT to be "under the Law" of the Creator of the universe! WHO knows better how we should live than HE does?!! The other thing you have to ask yourself is WHY would God give us His Torah, tell us it is ETERNAL, and then, a couple of thousand years later, tell us we no longer have to follow it, but instead follow a MAN-MADE, blasphemous, hate-filled work of fiction that He NEVER gave us!! Do you REALLY believe that God, Creator of the universe, DOESN'T know the meaning of the word "ETERNAL"??!! I suggest you look up the meaning of "ETERNAL" for yourself, since Christians don't seem to realize what that actually means! God's Torah is STILL in force, to this day, and will be to eternity!! You need to think VERY seriously about what I've just said to you, and do some honest research on the origins of Christianity for YOURSELF. You will find, as I did, that it did NOT come from God. If you are TRULY interested in knowing what God ACTUALLY said to us, you won't find it in Christianity - they have never studied the original Hebrew, so they are therefore working in the dark, and have no idea what the Hebrew scriptures ACTUALLY mean and therefore what God ACTUALLY said to us at Sinai. Christianity is biggest HOAX ever perpetrated on mankind and it seeks to destroy God's original words to us - that's why I left it about 20+ yrs. ago, after being a born-again, baptized, Evangelical Baptist Christian and then a 'Messianic' Christian, for 40+ years. PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.​

Punk rock? - Anarchy in the K - God save the King

@@spankflaps1365 Add to that Liar, Problems, and Pretty Vacant.

@@JRTIGER07 J'Zeus isn't in ANY Genealogy, because his "Father" was the "Holy Spirit". He had NO PHYSICAL FATHER, so had no King Line to claim, which is why INRI was Sarcastic.🙅

@@JRTIGER07 Other way around. None of my logic was refuted. No simple paragraph was written in response to my Christian Theology questions, because Christian Theology is as varied and Contradictory as Jihad Jannahs!🤡

@@JRTIGER07 (The Unholy Apocrypha even says that we must all "bear our own iniquities", which doesn't match up with Trinitarianism). The reason that Catholics don't read their "Bibles" is because the books are CONTRADICTORY. That's why they rely on Church Fathers, Church "History" and Church Tradition. No Catholic that I PERSONALLY know has a clue about Christian Theology, because even THEY don't follow it.

NOWHERE in the original Hebrew scriptures given to Moses at Mt. Sinai did God ever mention the "Jesus" character to us. NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mr. Sinai (God told us that His words are ETERNAL, i.e. STILL in effect and binding TODAY - a LIVING document!), therefore "Christianity" absolutely DID NOT come from God. PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely DID NOT come from God.

They are a big problem when you claim God has a human geneology!

Typo - give it a break 🙄

The biggest fraud perpetuated in recorded history

Your carnal idol of flesh made in the Image of Man Jesus is just like Krishna, Heathen Man worshiping his own fragile, pathetic Ego, ABOMINATIONS to the CREATOR, WHO Commanded that HE alone is to be worshiped!

You SPEAK AGAINST the MOST HIGH, a Hallmark of the LAST BEAST, Enemy of Gd and His Chosen Priestly People, His High Holy Ones, His Firstborn Son, Israel the Jews.

Have you been taking any kind of medications Or?

God is not a man.

I'm really tempted to show this vile hatred to every Christian I know because maybe we need to leave you guys to deal with your enemies alone.

​@immanuel.isaiah714 People of every religion get persecuted.

​@@notawinemom8540 The Christian religion was created by Rome. It was designed to be the enemy of Israel and any other community which would stand up to her globalist tyranny.

​@@notawinemom8540Christianity is who BURNED JEWS ALIVE over and over again, who INFLICTED 1700+ years of PERSECUTION, OPPRESSION and SLAUGHTER upon Gd's Firstborn Son Israel the Jews, becoming their longest enduring and most DEADLIEST of all their Oppressors, who to a T alone fits the description of the LAST BEAST, Enemy of Gd and His Chosen!

​@@notawinemom8540Without the FALSE TEACHINGS of Jesus/Cult of Christianity there would be no False Teacher Mohammed, no Hamas, no Nazis, no Isis, no Killer Crusaders, no Hezbollah, no Inquisition, no PLO, no Pogroms, etc.,.

Think. Lamentations is an entirely different book. Neither author was cross referencing each other's text to decide who meant what. Not only that, but it is silly to think that because a nation goes astray that there are not still people a part of that nation who are righteous and suffer. Don't you as an individual sometimes suffer from the negative intentions of others, while being totally innocent of their accusations? Your entire Christian Bible is used for a different purpose and so horribly out of context. You pick an author and verse here or there--and without any understanding of Jewish national history or its leaders or its various forks of government or its constitutional principles or its historic debates or its language or its idioms--somehow you think you can prove your foreign religion is legitimized by the texts. It's like using the Federalist papers to prove your great aunt's cookie recipe was truly divine.

Please explain to me from Isaiah 53:6 [see below] how do you reconcile Israel being the 'Suffering Servant' with this scriptural passage from OUR Hebrew Bible...Please respond to my questions in the brackets...First the scriptural verse [All caps for emphasis]... "ALL we like sheep have gone astray; we have ALL turned to our own way. And the LORD has laid on HIM the iniquity of US ALL" Point #1 "ALL we like sheep have gone astray" [Would ALL not include the people of Israel?] Point #2 "We have ALL turned to our own way" [Again would not all include Israel?] Point #3 "And the LORD has laid on HIM the iniquity of US ALL" [HIM is a singular masculine pronoun and US ALL references a collective people, so please explain, who is HIM? and again, does not 'US ALL' include Israel? Could Israel be both HIM and US ALL?...Logic would dictate no, correct?] My position is that Jesus is the suffering Servant Next...Please read the below passage from Isaiah 42:6, who is the LORD referencing? Isaiah 42:6 "I the LORD have called you to demonstrate my righteousnes. I will take you by the hand and guard you and give you to my people Israel, as a symbol of my covenant with them and you will be a light to guide the nations" Point #1 'Give YOU to my people Israel' ...Means it can't be Israel, correct? Point #2 Jesus was the Messiah to be 'a light to the Nations'...This is a foreshadow of Jesus in Isaih 53 Please note, I am a firm supporter of the Jewish people and Israel and I know as the scripture teaches in Revelation, Jesus will come back to Jerusalem and save Israel I implore you to turn to Him!!...Amen.

He has come already but Jews rejected him and even murdered him. That is why God punished them in the hands of Romans in 70 CE by sacking them and scattering them all over the world for the last 2000 years. God has abandoned them for good and you will never see another messiah coming for them for eternity. The messiah has come exactly as prophesied in Isaiah 7:14: "the virgin will conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel." And he has been sacrificed for our sins exactly as prophesied: "he was pierced for our transgressions. He was crushed for our iniquities. The punishment that brought our peace was on him; and by his wounds we are healed." Isaiah 53:5 And was buried among the wicked exactly as prophesied: "They made his grave with the wicked, and with a rich man in his death, although he had done no violence, nor was any deceit in his mouth." Isaiah 53:9 This is why no one will respond to you because none of them knows the answers to your questions. If anyone does, it will be from his own delusional imagination.

​@@tommason5689: NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mr. Sinai (God told us that His words are ETERNAL, i.e. STILL in effect and binding TODAY - a LIVING document!), therefore "Christianity" absolutely DID NOT come from God. PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely DID NOT come from God.

@@janishart5128 When you said: "NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mr. Sinai", you are denying your own tanak and showing your sheer ignorance. You are basically saying Torah is only scripture given by God, which even your leader Tovia and most of other Judaists would not agree. You are more in line with Muslims than Judaists. Read the book of Isaiah and Jeremiah, which are full of God's prophesies about the destruction of Israelites in the hands of Assyrians and Babylonians. Then you will know how little you know about your own tanak, the Hebrew bible.

@@janishart5128 Capitalizing letters is not going to add credibility to your words. Jesus was given a scripture, and Muhammed was given a scripture too. Besides, the torah of Moses is not the book you have today. Moses spoke Egyptian not hebrew.

If God were to have body and form, He would be limited and defined, because it is impossible for there to be a body which has no limitation. Everything that has limitation and definition, by virtue of its body, also has a limited and bounded power. Since God's ability and power have no limitation or boundary, His power is not the power of a body. And since He does not have a body or any form, He cannot be affected by any circumstances that can affect a body, as for example the effects of being separate from another entity. Thus it is impossible for Him to be anything other than one.

The New Testament is irrelevant

you have free choice that means you are free to decide for yourself whether your choice is based on fact or not. You will not find a Jew who is going to pressure you into believing what we believe. this is contrary to Christians who are obsessed with trying to convert us Jews to Christianity

​@@ViralChristianityDaniel tells of a vision of "one like a man" standing before the ANCIENT OF DAYS, who like his forefather King David will represent all of Israel the Jews, nowhere does it say that he will be worshiped, keep reading and you find out that Visions were about how Israel, Gd's Chosen will receive and inherit the Kingdom forever and to all Eternity. The Moshiach will be a mortal man of flesh and blood, a direct descendant of King David from his very body/seed, son after son, from the Tribe of Judah, of the House of David, who Isaiah tells comes at the End of the Days and will be ANIMATED BY THE FEAR OF THE LRD!

​@@ViralChristianityThere are No Fallen Angels in Scripture, just as there is no Hell of eternal torment, no lake of fire, those beliefs are those of the Enemies of Gd and His Chosen, His Firstborn Son Israel the Jews.

good try. but not really because the nt is NOT Scripture!!

@@MaggieOM-ul7xi According to you. However, you are not Yah, so I will take His Written scriptures which includes the Renewed Covenant over anyone's opinion. Whether you believe in it, or not, is of no consequence to me. You are free to believe what you will, as am I. However, my comment was not to convince you of it's validity. I was speaking directly to the misinterpretation of the verse itself.

@@torahobservant8708: What Maggie said toy you happens to be TRUE! NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mr. Sinai (God told us that His words are ETERNAL, i.e. STILL in effect and binding TODAY - a LIVING document!), therefore "Christianity" absolutely DID NOT come from God. PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely DID NOT come from God.

@@janishart5128 Talmud regarding BOTH (Triumphant/Suffering Messiah): It is very interesting that most will act as if this is a "Christian theology" when it is absolutely in the Talmud and the Zohar based off their own readings of the TANACH (which I have by the way, thanks for the suggestion) that the Messiah could come and die for the community (Suffering Messiah Ben Yoseph and then later Triumphant Messiah Ben David). The only difference is they believe it would be 2 separate Messiah’s, we believe He will do both. Yet, I hear this often how supposedly the Christians (Paul, etc.) are purely going from the NT and do not have the backing of Jewish Bible. Scripture's clearly speak of how the Messiah will come, and wars cease, etc. However, there are also prophesies in the Tanach about His suffering, even those in the Talmud knew this. Yes, even the possibility of the Messiah having to DIE the first time He came. This, according to them, was if He found them unworthy at the time of His first coming. Most would agree, at the time of Yeshua, there was some shady things taking place in Jerusalem as far as who was the High Priest, etc. Mashiach Ben Yosef in the Zohar: “When the Mashiach hears of the great suffering of Israel in their dispersion, and of the wicked amongst them who seek not to know their Master. He weeps aloud on account of those wicked ones amongst them, as it is written: But He was wounded because of our transgression, he was crushed because of our iniquities”… The Mashiach, on His part enters a certain Hall in the Garden of Eden, called the Hall of the Afflicted. There He calls for all the diseases and pains and sufferings of Israel, bidding them settle on Himself. Which they do. And were it not that He thus eases the burden from Israel taking it on himself. No one could endure the sufferings meted out to Israel in expiation on account of their neglect of the Torah. So scripture says: “Surely our diseases he did bear.” As long as Israel were in the Holy Land by means of the Temple service and sacrifices that averted all evil diseases and afflictions from the world. Now it is the Mashiach who is the means of averting them from mankind until the time when a man quits this world and receives his punishment… “ 24 This is speaking of Isaiah 53:5-8 and disagrees that it is speaking of Israel, and not the Messiah. Talmud - Mas. Sukkah 52a: What is the cause of the mourning (mentioned in the last cited verse)? R. Dosa and the Rabbis differ on the point. One explained, The cause is the slaying of the Messiah the son of Joseph, and the other explained, The cause is the slaying of the Evil Inclination. It is well according to him who explains that the cause is the slaying of Messiah the son of Joseph, since that well agrees with the Scriptural verse, And they shall look upon me because they have thrust him through, and they shall mourn for him as one mourneth for his only son: but according to him who explains the cause to be the slaying of the Evil Inclination, is this (it may be objected) an occasion for rejoicing? Why then should they weep? - (The explanation is) as R. Judah expounded: In the time to come the Holy One, blessed be He, will bring the Evil Inclination and slay it in the presence of the righteous and the wicked. Talmud above also shows they believed the Messiah could very well die for the sins of the people. Yes, not all agreed, however, it proves that even the Jews knew it was a real possibility that the Messiah would have to die for the sins of His people. Talmud: “R. Joshua opposed two verses: it is written, ‘And behold, one like the son of man came with the clouds of heaven; whilst elsewhere it is written, ‘behold, thy King cometh unto thee lowly and riding upon an ass!” ’16 After much discussion on these seeming contradictory passages, the Rabbis concluded:” If they (Israel) are meritorious, he will come with the clouds of heaven; if not, lowly and riding upon as ass”17 Which “lowly and riding upon a donkey (ass)” is exactly what Yeshua did. As far as the Messiah having to die for the sins of the people, some quote ezekiel 18:20-21, as to say that it proves this can not be, "The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him (18:20). But if a wicked person turns away from all his sins that he has committed and keeps all my statutes and does what is just and right, he shall surely live; he shall not die. All his transgressions that he hath committed, they shall not be mentioned unto him: in his righteousness that he hath done he shall live." Again, the Talmud and the Zohar disagree with you... Here is some interesting commentary from a Jewish man…Sorry, I couldn't figure out his name, anyway, the Zohar is referenced. “Isaiah 57:1 The righteous one perishes, and no man takes it to heart; men of kindness are gathered in with no one understanding that because of the impending evil the RIGHTEOUS ONE was gathered in. He will come in peace; they will rest on their resting places - he who walks in his integrity. (Tanach) Zohar states (III 118b): "If the sins multiply in the world, then ALL the righteous suffer in order to cure (bring to repentance) the generation. But when THEY are not so much, then ONE RIGHTEOUS PERSON suffers and the rest are left in peace because the world does not need their sufferings. If the people are cured (they repent) then the righteous are cured. There are times that righteous men suffer their whole lives to protect the generation. When the sins get very great, the righteous die, and that causes them to be cured, and they are forgiven"” Continuing, “In Rabbinic literature the reason why the righteous suffer even when they have not sinned is so that those who see their suffering should repent of their sins. Isaiah 57 explains this. It is similar to the reason why a sacrifice is brought for an unintentional sin. He should look at the innocent animal and say that I should be that sacrifice and repent of his sins.” This is clearly stated in the Zohar (III 57b): "All those who are pained by the suffering of the righteous their sins are removed from the world... all those that are pained from those righteous who have died, or who sheds tears for them, G-d proclaims over him, 'Your sins are removed, your iniquities removed.' Not just that, but his children will not die in his days as it says, 'He will see seed, and lengthen his days.' (Is 53:10)" The suffering is to effect repentance and hence atonement of sin. Suffering does not atone. The repentance that one does because of the death or suffering of the righteous atones.”

@@janishart5128 Love how they are deleting my posts...proves I'm speaking Truth...Talmud regarding BOTH (Triumphant/Suffering Messiah): It is very interesting that most will act as if this is a "Christian theology" when it is absolutely in the Talmud and the Zohar based off their own readings of the TANACH (which I have by the way, thanks for the suggestion) that the Messiah could come and die for the community and rise again (Suffering Messiah Ben Yoseph and Triumphant Messiah Ben David). The only difference is they believe it would be 2 separate Messiah’s, we believe He will do both. Yet, I hear this often how supposedly the Christians (Paul, etc.) are purely going from the NT and do not have the backing of Jewish Bible. Scripture's clearly speak of how the Messiah will come, and wars cease, etc. However, there are also prophesies in the Tanach about His suffering, even those in the Talmud knew this. They wrote of how the Tanach teaches BOTH (Triumphant/Suffering Messiah). Yes, even the possibility of the Messiah having to DIE the first time He came. This, according to them, was if He found them unworthy at the time of His first coming. Most would agree, at the time of Yeshua, there was some shady things taking place in Jerusalem as far as who was the High Priest, etc. Mashiach Ben Yosef in the Zohar: “When the Mashiach hears of the great suffering of Israel in their dispersion, and of the wicked amongst them who seek not to know their Master. He weeps aloud on account of those wicked ones amongst them, as it is written: But He was wounded because of our transgression, he was crushed because of our iniquities”… The Mashiach, on His part enters a certain Hall in the Garden of Eden, called the Hall of the Afflicted. There He calls for all the diseases and pains and sufferings of Israel, bidding them settle on Himself. Which they do. And were it not that He thus eases the burden from Israel taking it on himself. No one could endure the sufferings meted out to Israel in expiation on account of their neglect of the Torah. So scripture says: “Surely our diseases he did bear.” As long as Israel were in the Holy Land by means of the Temple service and sacrifices that averted all evil diseases and afflictions from the world. Now it is the Mashiach who is the means of averting them from mankind until the time when a man quits this world and receives his punishment… “ 24 This is speaking of Isaiah 53:5-8 and disagrees that it is speaking of Israel, and not the Messiah. Talmud - Mas. Sukkah 52a: What is the cause of the mourning (mentioned in the last cited verse)? R. Dosa and the Rabbis differ on the point. One explained, The cause is the slaying of the Messiah the son of Joseph, and the other explained, The cause is the slaying of the Evil Inclination. It is well according to him who explains that the cause is the slaying of Messiah the son of Joseph, since that well agrees with the Scriptural verse, And they shall look upon me because they have thrust him through, and they shall mourn for him as one mourneth for his only son: but according to him who explains the cause to be the slaying of the Evil Inclination, is this (it may be objected) an occasion for rejoicing? Why then should they weep? - (The explanation is) as R. Judah expounded: In the time to come the Holy One, blessed be He, will bring the Evil Inclination and slay it in the presence of the righteous and the wicked. Talmud above also shows they believed the Messiah could very well die for the sins of the people. Yes, not all agreed, however, it proves that even the Jews knew it was a real possibility that the Messiah would have to die for the sins of His people. Talmud: “R. Joshua opposed two verses: it is written, ‘And behold, one like the son of man came with the clouds of heaven; whilst elsewhere it is written, ‘behold, thy King cometh unto thee lowly and riding upon an ass!” ’16 After much discussion on these seeming contradictory passages, the Rabbis concluded:” If they (Israel) are meritorious, he will come with the clouds of heaven; if not, lowly and riding upon as ass”17 Which “lowly and riding upon a donkey (ass)” is exactly what Yeshua did. As far as the Messiah having to die for the sins of the people, some quote ezekiel 18:20-21, as to say that it proves this can not be, "The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him (18:20). But if a wicked person turns away from all his sins that he has committed and keeps all my statutes and does what is just and right, he shall surely live; he shall not die. All his transgressions that he hath committed, they shall not be mentioned unto him: in his righteousness that he hath done he shall live." Again, the Talmud and the Zohar disagree with you... Here is some interesting commentary from a Jewish man…Sorry, I couldn't figure out his name, anyway, the Zohar is referenced. “Isaiah 57:1 The righteous one perishes, and no man takes it to heart; men of kindness are gathered in with no one understanding that because of the impending evil the RIGHTEOUS ONE was gathered in. He will come in peace; they will rest on their resting places - he who walks in his integrity. (Tanach) Zohar states (III 118b): "If the sins multiply in the world, then ALL the righteous suffer in order to cure (bring to repentance) the generation. But when THEY are not so much, then ONE RIGHTEOUS PERSON suffers and the rest are left in peace because the world does not need their sufferings. If the people are cured (they repent) then the righteous are cured. There are times that righteous men suffer their whole lives to protect the generation. When the sins get very great, the righteous die, and that causes them to be cured, and they are forgiven"” Continuing, “In Rabbinic literature the reason why the righteous suffer even when they have not sinned is so that those who see their suffering should repent of their sins. Isaiah 57 explains this. It is similar to the reason why a sacrifice is brought for an unintentional sin. He should look at the innocent animal and say that I should be that sacrifice and repent of his sins.” This is clearly stated in the Zohar (III 57b): "All those who are pained by the suffering of the righteous their sins are removed from the world... all those that are pained from those righteous who have died, or who sheds tears for them, G-d proclaims over him, 'Your sins are removed, your iniquities removed.' Not just that, but his children will not die in his days as it says, 'He will see seed, and lengthen his days.' (Is 53:10)" The suffering is to effect repentance and hence atonement of sin. Suffering does not atone. The repentance that one does because of the death or suffering of the righteous atones.”

justin etc: So there is nothing special about "Jesus", then? How can anybody take all this nonsense seriously? There is no good, credible, extra-biblical, contemporary evidence that the "Jesus" character, as described in the New Testament, actually existed. All that virgin birth, miracle-working, dying-and-rising stuff is just make-believe.

Seriously, read it carefully and prayerfully. I dare ya! 🙂 Proverbs 18:13 (KJV) He that answereth a matter before he heareth [it], it [is] folly and shame unto him.

We prefer Hashem to the holy spook.

King James version? Oh ya thats the newer shorter Bible that took out books from the original so why go with the that one?

⁠@@lynx1598you cannot name a better more accurate and thoroughly complete *English* version. Hebrews 4:1-7 (KJV) 1 Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left [us] of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it. 2 For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard [it]. 3 For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world. 4 For he spake in a certain place of the seventh [day] on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works. 5 And in this [place] again, If they shall enter into my rest. 6 Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief: 7 Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts.

​@Curtis1984 it's cool if you like the kjv that took out books that Christians recognized and was apart if thier official cannon since 393 a.d. and the newer shorter version came out in 1611 and is only recognized by the minority of Christians while the majority use the original cannon that's been recognized by real Christians since 393 a.d.

Christianity doctrines are all gentile Greco Roman pagan doctrines and it’s a historical fact. Christians knows it too.

Doesn’t mean it’s Jesus.

@@mooshei8165 And the LORD has turned on HIM the iniquity of US ALL... Question #1 Him is the singular masculine pronoun, correct?...That can't be Israel, correct? Question #2 Us ALL refers to a collective people, ALL would include Israel, correct? Question #3 Logic dictates Israel can't be 'Him' and 'Us all' correct? Question #4 Who do you believe is 'Him' and 'Us all'? Please respond to the above questions I believe the Scripture from OUR Holy Bible teaches 'Us all' would be sinners BOTH Jews and Gentiles and 'Him' the Messiah Jesus who bared our sinful transgressions and nailed them to the Cross for our salvation!...Please, turn to Jesus...The WHOLE account of Isaiah 53 is played out in the Crucifuxtion of Jesus!...And you can't give an informed response without reading the Gospel...God Bless!!

Of course it does. @@mooshei8165

@@stephenarrigo5679 read the Bible? Most, if not, all Christians don’t even read the Bible. Maybe they’ll cherry pick from it and inserting Jesus name into the Jews Torah.

@@mooshei8165 I noticed in your reply you did not answer any of the questions I put forth on Isaiah 53:6...How come?...You are welcome to put forth a refutation but I believe the clear language of the scripture prevents that, thus you didn't...Come to Jesus, He welcomes you!! "I am the way and the truth and the the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. John 14:6 God Bless!!

They are both Joseph's genealogy. They say so.

@@DIBBY40 No they don't...It was proven that it actually say's Mary's Father, not husband.

How many husbands did Mary have and how many dads did Jesus have?

@@laccess911 Mary had two men in her life. Pantera and Joseph. In regards to his father, there are only two fathers. The One above, and the one below. I ask you, who was Jesus father?

@@davisuehara3528 Jesus doesn’t have a father. He has a mother only.

Abraham kept the 7 Noahide laws.

@@hrvatskinoahid1048 Abraham was of the dispensation/covenant of promise….Ishmaels next dispensation/covenant would be “the law”….then would come the child of supernatural birth like isaacs birth but this would be Jesus to bring forth the issac covenant of “Faith”. Faith that Jesus died rose again and your sins are forgiven by believing in his sacrifice Promise or Patriarchal Rule - From Abraham to Moses. Ends with the refusal to enter Canaan and the 40 years of unbelief in the wilderness. Some use the terms Abrahamic law or Abrahamic covenant in reference to this period of dispensation. Law - From Moses to the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. Ends with the scattering of Israel in AD 70. Some use the term Mosaic law in reference to this period of dispensation. Grace - From the cross to the rapture of the church seen by some groups as being present in 1 Thessalonians and the Book of Revelation. The rapture is followed by wrath of God constituting the Great Tribulation. Some use the term Age of Grace or the Church Age for this dispensation.

@@nikered123 The commandments of the Torah are eternal and immutable: 613 for Jews and the 7 for Gentiles.

@@hrvatskinoahid1048 if you look at the two sons of Abraham Ishmael was the offspring of the slave woman and was brought forth naturally but when the supernatural born son was brought forth his covenant was going to be the righteous covenant God wanted to use if Abraham hadn’t become impatient and planted his 1st seed into the slave woman. Genesis 15 tells us Abraham “believed” and it was counted on to him as righteousness this is the covenant God wanted to bring but Abraham had Ishmael therefore the law had to come first Do you notice Ishmaels mother took him out to the desert…..and the next covenant that comes after abraham is Moses takes Hebrew children out to the desert to receive the covenant of the law The 1500 years later a child is born supernatural like Isaac was born supernatural and now we are under the Isaac covenant if we “believe by faith”….but Jews want to remain under Ishmaels covenant of the law…once this Isaac covenant ends God will combine the two covenants during the millennium and reinstate the law /Ishmael covenant for holiness and the Isaac covenant/faith in Jesus for salvation….that is why you see the law reinstated during the millennium….for holiness not salvation…the Isaac covenant is for salvation

Comment by @enriquemoure7212 Yeshua fulfilled with PIN POINT ACCURACY the prophecies of the Hebrew prophets: # 1-the Messiah would be born in a miraculous birth. a virgin would conceive without copulation from a male. Gen. 3:15; Isa. 7:14; Matt. 1:18-23; Luke 2:26-35 # 2-He had to be born in Bethlehem. Micah 5:2; Matt. 2:1-6; Luke 2:1-7 # 3-from the tribe of Judah. Gen. 49:8, 9; Heb. 7:14 # 4-a descendant of king David. Isa. 9:7; 11:1-10; Jer. 23:6; Matt. 1:1-17; Luke 3:23-38 # 5-yet pre existed David being His Lord, Psalm 110:1; Matt. 22:41-45 # 6-the Messiah would be called God Psalm 45:6; Isa. 7:14; 9:6; Jer. 23:6; Matt. 1:23; John 1:1-3 # 7-He had to be born before the right to impose Jewish law (capital punishment) was removed and before the national identity of Judah was taken away. Gen. 49:10; John 18:31 NOTE This prophecy gives specific indicators regarding the time of the coming of the Messiah! The prophecy declares that He would come before the right to impose Jewish law (which includes capital punishment) is restricted and before the national identity of Judah is removed! During the 70-year Babylonian captivity, (606-537 B.C.) the southern kingdom of Israel, Judah, had lost it's national sovereignty, but retained it's tribal staff or national identity. in the book of Ezra we read that during the 70-year Babylonian captivity the Jews still retained their own lawgivers or judges. The scepter had not been lost during the Babylonian captivity. During the next five centuries the Jews suffered under the yoke of the Medo-Persian, Greek and Roman Empires. In the first quarter of the first century A.D., the Jews were under Roman domination when an unprecedented event occurred. According to Josephus (Antiquities 17:13) around the year A.D. 6-7, the successor to King Herod, Archelaus, was dethroned and banished to Vienna, a city of Gaul. He was replaced, not by a Jewish king, but by a Roman Procurator named Caponius. The legal power of the Sanhedrin was immediately restricted. With the ascension of Caponius, the Sanhedrin lost their ability to adjudicate capital cases. This was the normal policy toward all the nations under the yoke of the Romans. The province of Judea had, however, been spared from this policy up to this point. However, Caesar Agustus had had enough of the Jews and finally removed the judicial authority from them at the ascension of Caponius. This transfer of power was recorded by Josephus. "And now Archelaus' part of Judea was reduced into a province, and Caponius, one of the equestrian order of the Romans, was sent as a procurator, having the power of life and death put into his hands by Caesar!" The power of the Sanhedrin to adjudicate capital cases was immediately removed. Pilate's cowardly attempt to avoid responsibility for the crucifixion of Jesus is recorded, "Pilate said to them, “You take Him and judge Him according to your law.” Therefore the Jews said to him, “It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death,” John 18:31 In the minds of the Jewish leadership, this event signified the removal of the scepter or national identity of the tribe of Judah! If you think that this is a Christian contrivance, think again. Here are several ancient rabbinical references that indicate that the rabbis believed that Genesis 49:10 was referring to the Messiah. In the Targum Onkelos it states: "The transmission of domain shall not cease from the house of Judah, nor the scribe from his children's children, forever, until Messiah comes." In the Targum Pseudo-Jonathan it states: "King and rulers shall not cease from the house of Judah...until King Messiah comes" The Targum Yerushalmi states: "Kings shall not cease from the house of Judah...until the time of the coming of the King Messiah...to whom all the dominions of the earth shall become subservient" In the Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 98b, Rabbi Johanan said: "The world was created for the sake of the Messiah, what is this Messiah's name? The school of Rabbi Shila said 'his name is Shiloh, for it is written; until Shiloh come.'" These amazing commentaries should eliminate any doubt that the Jews that lived prior to the Christian era believed that one of the names of the Messiah was Shiloh. Furthermore, these quotes should eliminate all doubt that the ancient rabbis believed that the Messiah would come before the removal of the scepter from Judah! What was the reaction of the Jews when the right to adjudicate capital cases was removed from Judah? Did they view the removal of their authority on capital cases as the removal of the scepter from Judah? The answer is YES! Woe Unto Us, For Messiah Has Not Appeared! The reaction of the Jews to these monumental events is recorded in the Talmud. Augustin Lemann, in his book Jesue before the Sanhedrin, records a statement by Rabbi Rachmon: "When the members of the Sanhedrin found themselves deprived of their right over life and death, a general consternation took possession of them: they covered their heads with ashes, and their bodies with sackcloth, exclaiming: 'Woe unto us for the scepter has departed from Judah and the Messiah has not come'" The scepter was smitten from the hands of the tribe of Judah. The kingdom of Judea, the last remnant of the greatness of Israel, was debased into being merely a part of the province of Syria. While the Jews wept in the streets of Jerusalem, there was growing up in the city of Nazareth the young son of a Jewish carpenter, Jesus of Nazareth. The inescapable conclusion was that Shiloh had come! Only then was the Scepter removed! # 8-His death and resurrection occurred exactly 490 years after the commandment of the Persian king Artaxerxes to Ezra to rebuild Jerusalem. Ezra 7:7-26; Dan. 9:24-27 # 9-as a small Child an attempt in His life had to be made by an order to mass murder children 2 years and under. Jer. 31:15 cf. Matt. 2:18 # 10-He had to be rejected by His own people, the Jews. Isa. 53:3; Psalm 118:22; John 1:11; 5:39, 40 Acts 4:11 # 11- He had to be forsaken by His disciples. Zech. 13:7; Matt. 26:56; Mark 14:50 # 12- He had to be betrayed by a close friend for 30 pieces of silver. Psalm 41:9; 55:12-14; Zech, 11:12, 13;John 13:18; Luke 22:47, 48; Matt. 26:14-16; 27:3-10 # 13-He had to die the violent death of crucifixion, including having His clothes gambled for. Psalm 22:12-18; Matt. 27:35; John 19:24 # 14-He had to die among criminals and buried in the tomb of a rich man. Isa. 53:9; Matt. 27:38, 57-60; Mark 15:27; Luke 23:33 # 15-He was given vinegar to quench His thirst. Psalm 69:21; John 19:28 NOTE He was given a sour wine that contained a form of narcotic which He refused to drink. Matt. 27:34; Mark 15:23 # 16-Like the Passover lamb none of His bones were broken. Exd. 12:46; John 19:31-36 # 17-His sacrifice brought an abrupt end to animal sacrifices. His rejection caused the destruction of the temple and the city of Jerusalem. Psalm 40:6, 7; Jer. 31:31-34; Dan. 9:24-27; Matt. 24:1, 2; Mark 12:1-9; Luke 19:41-44; 21:20-24 # 18-His religion would transcend Judaism and draw multitudes from Gentile nations. Isaiah 42:1-7; 54; 55:5, 60:3, 65:1; Matt. 8:11, 12; 21:43; Luke 13:28, 29; Acts 11:18; 13:46-48; 15:3; 18:6; 26-20-23; 28:28 # 19-His arrival was prophesied as being preceded by a herald (John the Baptist) Isa. 40:3-5; Matt. 3:1-3; Mark 1:1-8; Luke 1:17, 76; 3:1-9 # 20- He was the Lord of the temple and He would confront and rebuke the hypocrisy of the Levite priests, Malachi 3:1-3; Matt. 23:13-36; Luke 11:42-52; John 8:44

The Sinai revelation took place in the Hebrew year 2448 (1312 B.C.E.).

@@carstenmanz302 There is no good, credible, extra-biblical, contemporary evidence that the "Jesus" character, as described in the New Testament, actually existed. See if you can find some.

No temple, no Messiah.

@@hrvatskinoahid1048 Shalom. The floor of the fırst temple was made of glass, I have no idea how it will be today.

Gentiles have no obligation to convert to Judaism.

Gd used the Book of Isaiah to remove the BLINDING SCALES from my eyes and Delivered me from a lifetime spent in willful BONDAGE TO HEATHEN IDOLATRY/CHRISTIANITY.

As Isaiah tells, King David's progeny, the Moshiach will come at the End of the Days and will be ANIMATED BY THE FEAR OF THE LRD!

The teachings of King David's progeny will bring about WORLD PEACE where the Wolves abide with the Lambs, where the Implements of War are turned into Implements of Agricultural and WAR IS NO MORE, just as they will bring all of Mankind to the Rightful worship of the CREATOR, the ETERNAL ONE, EHYEH ASHER EHYEH/I WILL BE WHAT I WILL BE, his GD, his LRD, his SAVIOR, his REDEEMER, to WHOM EVERY KNEE SHALL KNEEL, EVERY TONGUE SHALL SWEAR!

@@notawinemom8540it’s not even about Jesus. Stop inserting Jesus name in there.

@notawinemom8540 Ha! Get a real Bible, the Original Jewish Torah/Tanakh and read all of the Book of the Prophet Isaiah, who tells over and over again that Israel and Jacob are Gd's Servant, chapter 53 is no exception for it is where the DUMBFOUNDED Kings/Leaders of the Gentile Nations LAMENT that the Gentiles refused the Report/Truth, they Sinned and on their own initiative INFLICTED the Suffering upon Gd's Servant, Israel and Jacob, the Jews.

Truth be told 💯

What makes you think that Mary descended from David? Provide some evidence, before you write more rubbish! Also, Jesus did not descend from Joseph. The Gospels don't even say that Joseph adopted Jesus. So you have absolutely no case. You would need evidence for adoption.

How could Jesus descend from Joseph??? Mary was a virgin according to the gospels. Where is the proof she was not a virgin. Your telling me God could not impregnate Mary? Hashem does not have limits.

@Mark1615backup Where's Jesus's patrilineal geneology to David? Nowhere. Show us where in the Hebrew scriptures one can inherit geneology through adoption. According to Christianity, jesus was not the biological offspring of Joseph, and thus, has no tribal affiliation to King David. Where's inheritance of genealogy through adoption? Genesis 15 2And Abram said, "O Lord God, what will You give me, since I am going childless, and the steward of my household is Eliezer of Damascus?" 3And Abram said, "Behold, You have given me no children, 👉and behold, one of my household will inherit me."👈 4👉And behold, the word of the Lord came to him, saying, "This one will not inherit you👈, 👉but the one who will spring from your innards-he will inherit you."👈 Did Jesus spring from the innards of Joseph! NOPE!

@@johnruby1363, the child was not born of Joseph, and the fictitious narrative doesn't even say that Joseph adopted him, which would need to be legalised. As you wrote "same rules apply today". Do you have evidence that Joseph adopted him?

Moses was born to a man and a woman the dame way everyone else is. He was given up for adoption to save his life but luckiky his family and him did not stay hidden from each other or his geneology

What sort of mother puts her baby in a river and disappears?

@vcrcnk666 the type who prefers the chance of him being adopted over him being killed.

@@Matthew_Scan Sargon of Akkad and Romulus and Remus were put in a river. So it is pretty common troupe for "special people". When you read this you know that the author wanted to make them appear special.

Matthew writing about another Matthew in the third person?

Yoshke isn't the messiah because he did *_nothing_* messianic. The corrupted "new" testament is the least of your problems.

@@tshou520 Do you think that might be because you have been brainwashed for generations to believe that Yeshua is not the messiah? I would suggest that you actually find out what Yeshua did and what he taught

​@onejohn2.26. I found out that jebus did nothing and taught lies. It doesn't take a genius to figure out these lies, just a heart to follow G-d and His truth. The fact of the matter is that jezues did absolutely nothing that G-d says would happen when the messiah comes. G-d tells us that when the messiah comes, the exiles will be gathered in, the temple will be rebuilt, the sacrificial system will be reinstated, the world will be healed of all of it's afflictions, the resurrection of the d3@d will occur, the world will be at peace, etc. Quite the contrary occurred when jebus came. The Jews were scattered, the temple was destroyed, the sacrifices stopped, we were ki113d, and there was certainly no peace. What did jebus do? Nothing, besides a few magic tricks. I would suggest that you actually find out what G-d's opinion on the matter is.

​@@onejohn2.26.Do you think you might be brainwashed for centuries by your own religion to think it's okay to redefine the leadership roles of a nation you don't even belong to? As an American, how would you feel if some future foreign religion told your descendants they could only achieve Nirvana through faith in Uncle Sam who was the one true "President" and "commander in chief"? Or that MLK was the one true President rejected by the blind Americans and sacrificed so that we no longer have to offer fireworks on Independence day? Absurd. And so is the Christian reinvention of the term "Messiah."

*There is no prophecy in Genesis 3:15.* The seed of the woman is mentioned, because she was one who was tempted, that is all. This speaks of hatered between human kind and real snakes, nothing more. It is not a prophecy. Or do you think JC was also the son of Hagar, because she was blessed with 'seed' by god's angel: *Genesis 16:10 Chabad (the correct translation)* 10And the angel of the Lord said to her, "I will greatly multiply *your seed,* and it will not be counted for abundance." Or Rebecca as her brothers blessed her with seed: *Genesis 24:60 Chabad (the correct translation)* 60And they blessed Rebecca and said to her, "Our sister, may you become thousands of myriads, and may *your seed* inherit the cities of their enemies". *There is no prophecy there, just an explanation of eternal hatered between snakes (who are real snakes and not the devil as you precieve) and the human kind.* *All God's curses to the serpent only bifit snakes.* I mean, why would God punish the serpent with punishments only befitting it ?? Why punish it at all as it was innocent -what kind of God punishes the innocent for being victimised?? and Satan got away scott free ???? It has nothing to do with Satan or the seed (JC) crushing it. It explains the human natural distaste of snakes. Nothing more. ___________________________________________________ *See how you were all lied to:* *The Messiah making the sacrefices, including sin sacrefices as atonement for himself (!!) and for the people* *Ezekiel 45* 17And the burnt-offerings and the meal-offerings and the libations on the Festivals and on the New Moons and on the Sabbaths, and on all the times fixed for meetings of the House of Israel shall devolve on the prince; *he shall prepare the sin-offering* and the meal-offering and the burnt offering and the peace-offering, *to effect atonement for the House of Israel.* 22 *And the prince shall make on that day for himself and for all the people of Israel a bull for a sin-offering.* *Who beguiled you ?? You know the answer - Paul. Paul knew all that, but he also knew the gentiles couldn't read the hebrew. You all fell for the lies of a self proclaimed liar. He couldn't fool us.* *Why would I choose the words of a liar over the words of God through His chosen prophets??*

@@user-mn9bh6kb7c *There is only one true prophet who was killed by the order of a vicious king, not by the people, and even his name Jesus couldn't name right:* *Matthew 23:35* "And so upon you will come all the righteous blood that has been shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah son of Berekiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar." Zechariah son of Berekiah was not the priest that was killed at the alter. It was Zechariah son of Jehoiada that was killed ! Zechariah son of Berekiah (the prophet who wrote Zechariah) lived in the time of the return from the exile ! Zechariah son of Jehoiada that was killed lived in the time of king Yoash ! *And for some reason Luke's gospels omitted the full name of the prophet, referring to him only as Zechariah* Jesus couldn't even teach the bible to kindergarten kids. ___________________________________________________ Would you like to see other proves of Jesus's mistakes and false prophecies ??

No temple, no Messiah.

Absolutely and profoundly WRONG!!!!

Jews were not able to teach Gentiles the Noahide laws because your coreligionists persecuted them.

@@aaronmusa234 sounds like jesus was warning about Muhammad

you seem to have an issue with the limitation of God. My God is unlimited, so he can be everywhere at all times and know all things in everyone's heart. So if God can be everywhere at all times, why can't he be in the flesh of a man? Jesus came to be the perfect sacrifice for the world, it is complete and muhammed is the the wolf in sheeps clothing. Does he not take the sayings of Jesus and tell you this is what Jesus meant, yet he has no miracles attributed to him and Jesus's ministry was filled with miracles. I think I will go with the one who came in power and might and follow him and trust that he took away my sins, past, present and future. @@aaronmusa234

@@aaronmusa234 have you actually read the parable?

@@timhochstetler No he can't, as it is not written in the Hebrew scriptures. You show us where there are explicit texts in the Hebrew scriptures he was going to do what your false messiah is claimed to have done. He could've come as Ironman, claiming to be the messiah for all we care. We won't accept him, as it is not recorded in the Hebrew scriptures. Do you get that??

Leyla, allow your ears to hear what your mouth is saying 😳 jesus didn’t fulfill even one of the requirements of the Moshiach 😤🙄

(Constantine) divine hellenized roman g-d sun hesus hours Krishna sanskirt for Christ fulfilled the prophecy of Zechariah 9:9 duh! The holy old babel polytheist doctrine of trinity says so! I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things in the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, the Bright and Morning Star.”the New Testament, there are contradictions between the genealogies of Jesus given in the first chapter of Matthew and the third chapter of Luke. Both genealogies begin with Jesus' father, who is identified as Joseph (which is curious, given that Mary was supposedly impregnated by the Holy Ghost (no one figured those out yet lol)

Yeshua Bar Yosef Ossuary 80/503 "Yeshua bar Yosef” - “Jesus, Son of Joseph” It is the plainest of the ten ossuaries found in the tomb, a modest coffin, perhaps made in haste. Alarmingly, there is a large cross mark right next to the name “Jesus.” A cross, deliberately carved. The archaeologists, however, immediately and ever since, dismissed this as a mason’s mark. Besides, they say, Christians didn’t use crosses until the time of Constantine in the 4th century. This “Jesus, Son of Joseph” ossuary couldn’t belong to that Jesus, son of Joseph. Back in 1926, another “Jesus, son of Joseph” ossuary was discovered languishing in the basement of what is now the Rockefeller Museum-by none other that Eleazer Sukenik, the archaeologist famous for his 1948 discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls. The Hebrew University professor did not publicize his astonishing find until 1931 at a conference in Berlin. The news made headlines around the world. And then the world forgot all about it. Today, that same ossuary is on display at the Israel Museum. It is in no way connected with Jesus of Nazareth but instead is on display to send a message: don’t get excited if you find archaeological mention of any “Jesus.” The name is common.

G-d doesn't need a "new" testament. He does not need a "do-over." He got it right the first time in the true testament. He didn't change His mind. Reply

The Torah is Israel's constitution. Gonna make a lot more sense to have access to copies of that important library rather than to pulp fiction/propaganda of the Roman empire.

@@booksquid856 perfect, the book the romans persecuted for centuries and had their followers burned alive is their... propaganda? do people even think before they type things out?

The original Hebrew doesn’t say that at all.

You are such an ignoramus. There is no "virgin" birth prophecy in Is. 7:14 (you are basing yourself on a mistranslation of the Hebrew). Moreover, the passage relates to the Assyrian empire, which ceased to exist centuries before Jesus (note the Assyrian kings in the passage). The passage is not even messianic. No messiah is mentioned.

You're not relying on G-d, your relying on a xtian translators, and they're lying to you. Let me guess, you believe that alma means virgin, and you won't hear any different because the "Septuagint" says otherwise. So old and so boring. What can we say? xhristians are gonna xhristian. You don't want to know or believe the truth. You are perishing by your lack of knowledge. Learn Hebrew and break free of your idolatry.

The translation is completely wrong. You're trying to read the OT with a Christian belief system already in place. I was just like you for almost 30 years. I saw inconsistencies and I asked questions that couldn't be answered. I finally came to a knowledge of the Real G-d. I pray you do as well. Try reading the (OT) from a fresh perspective.

Rabbi Singer says it’s all idolatry if he thinks that fine , but he should be criticising Isaiah who says all this about the New Covenant and the Messiah

There are no "Hebrew manuscripts"! There are only Hebrew translations from the Greek. The Greek is the original. There is no genealogy of Mary anywhere. Michael Rood is lying.

Where's Jesus's patrilineal geneology to David? Nowhere. Show us where in the Hebrew scriptures one can inherit geneology through adoption. According to Christianity, jesus was not the biological offspring of Joseph, and thus, has no tribal affiliation to King David. Where's inheritance of genealogy through adoption? Genesis 15 2And Abram said, "O Lord God, what will You give me, since I am going childless, and the steward of my household is Eliezer of Damascus?" 3And Abram said, "Behold, You have given me no children, 👉and behold, one of my household will inherit me."👈 4👉And behold, the word of the Lord came to him, saying, "This one will not inherit you👈, 👉but the one who will spring from your innards-he will inherit you."👈 Did Jesus spring from the innards of Joseph! NOPE!

He’s a descendant of a Roman soldier

@@D18.21 , yes, and there is no evidence that Jesus was even adopted! Adoption is a legal arrangement requiring evidence. There isn't any of that for Jesus.

@@u.y.3643 , quite possibly.

Really now ?

More than 2,000 years is very soon😂😅🤣 .!

​@u.y.3643 Poor Jesus, he's running a bit late like the White Rabbit. : )

He told his disciples he would be back before that generation passed. Can we now call him a liar?

@user-mn9bh6kb7c Your Pagan Greco-Roman/Christian carnal idol of flesh Jesus is but a composite of a myriad of Pagan Greco-Roman Idols, PERSEUS the Virtuos Virgin born demigod, DIONYSUS the Water into Wine Miracle Maker and MITHRAS the Dying/Resurrecting idol who dies for the People, who raises the dead and heals the lame and the sick, whose Devotees Eat of the flesh and drink of the blood. Like his sidekick the Pagan Greco-Roman/Christian Devil with his lake of fire, they are but fabricated characters of Heathen Man, found only in the Greek Tall Tales of Heathen/NT and Joe Smith Jr's Book of Mormon, NOT the 24 Books of the Bible, the Torah/Tanakh.