Psalms 12 :6,7

@@herbbearingseed Psalm 12:6-7, has nothing to do with the King James Bible. There was neither no kjv and textus receptus back then. The "words of the LORD" are the promises of safety made to the needy or the poor from a generation of wicked individuals who had oppressed them. The poor are those whom the LORD will preserve and not the 1611 kjv that came many years after.

@@uncertainty7421 Textus Receptus means received by all. The name was given later. Still the same MSS. Good try.

@@herbbearingseed What manuscripts are you referring to? What does that have to do with Psalm 12:6-7?

@@uncertainty7421 The same MSS that the AV translators used are the same as those finally labelled later as TR in the 1640's, By Elzevir.

well said

Deuteronomy 21:18-21 King James Version So you say that if i respect and apply things like this there will be fewer problems?

Acts 12:4 Easter was celebrated in Biblical times. /sarcasm. King James Version "And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people." 1.) Nowhere within the KJV does it say God would use the KJV to preserve His word. 2.) The KJV is hardly the first authorized English Bible. 3.) It is certainly not the first Bible from an English king. 4.) The authorized KJV in 1611 authorized the Apocrypha. 5.) The KJV does in places quote from the Septuagint, thankfully. King James didn't like the Geneva Bible, the Bible favored by the English people, the Puritans left England with their Geneva Bibles to flee the Church of England and from being persecuted, and came to America. If only KJV people had a clue...

I’ll take Shakespeare.

Think you all should read it again it has multiple contradictions numerical contradictions and its not preserved by god the original scriptures were in Aramaic not English or Latin they burend all the orginal ones for political gain and to make money. Devilish people by the way King James was also know as the Queen of England wanna know why ? look it up!!! He him self was a contradiction to all that he wrote and changed!!!!!

@Chad Mathers wikipidia history of king james biography

@@raymack8767 Of course Easter was celebrated in “Biblical times” the verse at the start calls it the “feast of unleavened bread”which is the Passover in relation to the Jews and then when it mentions Herod,who comes from idumea,who is a pagan so he celebrates not Passover but Ishtar,the goddess of fertility, Which was celebrated at the around the same time.

The King James Bible also has it's own built in dictionary right in the text. First mention shows lots.

KJV is based on the Original Received Hebrew and Greek Manuscripts. Modern Bible versions is based from the Critical Text like the Codex Alexandria, Codex Vaticanus, etc. and they have alot of missing verses and it's been only discovered in the late 1800s. I don't believe that God would allow his perfect words to be buried for many centuries. I believe that a Perfect God can Perfectly Preserve His Perfect Words all through out generation. and the english version of the Preserved Word of God is the KJV.

1.) Nowhere within the KJV does it say God would use the KJV to preserve His word. 2.) The KJV is hardly the first authorized English Bible. 3.) It is certainly not the first Bible from an English king. 4.) The authorized KJV in 1611 authorized the Deuterocanon 5.) The KJV authorized the Deuterocanon be placed within it because they didn't want people to read it! /s. 6.) But if they knew it was not Scripture, then why include it at all? And if there was nothing wrong with it, why take it out later? 7.) King James didn't like the Geneva Bible, the Bible favored by the English people. The Puritans left England with their Geneva Bibles fleeing the Church of England's persecution and came to America.

@@raymack8767 What Bible do you read Ray?

@@maryjo5043 Okay… So which is your go to translation of GOD’WORD Mary Jo? 😌

He’s definitely got a knack for keeping people interested in things they might not be already in to!

The _very obvious_ placed jokes in there made it easier for them, I’m sure.

Paul's favorite translation

Dwarf except Paul wasn't around then. Kjv is mostly a compilation of the nine bibles that came before kjv, the Latin, or new phrases or words that seemingly have not appeared anywhere else before the kjv.

@@anonymousperson6462 My understanding is that despite the questionability of its sponsors KJV was translated directly from the available Hebrew and Greek texts. Great care was taken with much crosschecking to ensure accuracy. After the first edition equal care was made in typesetting. However much of the word choice has little to do with modern English and it is hard to understand.

That is right!

@@markhorton3994 Its not that hard to understand. It takes a bit of effort but much easier to understand than shakespeare

That's cool. I personally think the KJV is the best version in English. I agree with you about it being best to have multiple translation

What scripture supports the KJV only heresy ?

Chip Kempston - thank you!

Totally agree KJV onlyism is completely absurd. Thank God for better translations

The Bible.

The Ethiopian Bible

Thank you, for your honesty... and soundness of mind

Arya2611 he really was biased. I’m glad I’m not the only one that noticed. He was literally making fun of God and the Bible from the beginning.

Yes, he's making fun of it( The greatest masterpiece).

How? He died long before the first ever photograph was taken. But he did have his portrait painted twice.

The king James Translators themselves disagree with that statement. While the king James Bible is a beautiful translation, it can be fairly argued it is one of the least useful translations as many people today cannot understand it. The Bible itself even tells us to translate the Bible only in away so preserves the original meaning and so people can understand it. The King James Bible is very accurate translation, but in many ways it does change some of the meanings and many people cannot understand it

73 books bible is the real book that teaches real spiritual salvation, while KJV bible is only has 66 books bible.even denied Jesus Christ during mass in the transfiguration of the bread real body of christ.

Amen!

@@susanguardalupe7990 Good morning Susan. You said; "KJV bible is only has 66 books" The 1611 King James Bible had 73 books in it. In fact the King James translators translated the Apocrypha into English from the Sinaiticus. The Douay Reims uses the Apocrypha from the 1611 King James Bible

You say that but have you read every Bible there is out there? How do you know that this translation is really the closest/best 1 there is? How do you know that this translation doesn’t have things in there that could be steering you wrong?

Seven years and no thumbs up!? Tough crowd.

Ok you believe, but what if your wrong? What do you think is going to happen to your soul?

The original 1611 Bible does not use Joshua. It uses Iesus. The capital I looks like a J in the gothic typeface used, but you can see the same letter used when words like If and It are capitalized.

So which is the "best" translation there Chip??? And if you think OLDEST means BESTEST , then think again. And the CTs only had about 1400 manuscripts which do NOT even agree among themselves. Hhhmmmmmmmm,. LOCATION , LOCATION, LOCATION, God brought them out of Egypt for a reason. Alexandria is in Egypt. So why do you think that the Apostle Paul , NEVER , EVER went to Eqypt and especially Alexandria??? Come on , just your best guess. But the KJV and the TR manuscripts from which it comes , comprise nearly 5800 manuscripts. Your OLDEST as BESTEST arguments are full of holes and the 60 KJV Translators had your CORRUPTED CT manuscripts from Alexandria and they THREW them out for OBVIOUS reasons. You sound like you are trained in a formal Bible college which is corrupt and always in ERROR and you and your error riden professors always run back to Egypt. ALWAYS. Your answers give yourself away.

Do ye not know that the saints shall JUDGE the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to JUDGE the smallest matters? I Corin 6:2 kjv. But you cannot even get the basic DOCTRINES down like the Doctrine of Judgement. Which God also commands the BELIEVER to not fellowship with silly gooses like you. It is the DOCTRINE of SEPARATION and is used to keep the BELIEVER from getting a bunch of LEVEN on him and becoming spotted like you are. You just cannot accept REBUKE, REPROOF or CORRECTION, or INSTRUCTION and God says your an UNWISE person and a scorner. II Tim 4:2-4 kjv, Prov 9:8 kjv, Prov 14:6 kjv, Prov 10:7 kjv, Since you have NO authority and have NO Word of God , you are in the FLESH and you cannot RIGHTLY DIVIDE the Word of Truth. II Tim 2:15 kjv. You cannot STUDY because you have no word of God. That word is no where to be found in ANY of your modern versions. It is removed by your buddies from Alexandria. First , you have to HAVE the Word of Truth , but you have already REJECTED that . Your scholarship is hardly helping you and it is a STUMBLINGBLOCK to yourself and others who do not really understand the importance of the PRESERVED Word of God, KJV 1611. But you can still HUMBLE yourself , and REPENT . It is the RIGHT thing to do. Or will your PRIDE rise up and choke the TRUTH from you again?

Such as the different prefaces of the King James Bible that were fazed out due to not being able to explain statements such as ( Names diligently changed! ) & more!!!

Yo no disrespect but that was the reality you just spit 👆

they worshipping a revision not a translation smh

You silly goose Chip. You worship a fake bible with FAKE Christians. Philo, Marcion, Origen , Eusebius and Wescott and Hort were NOT Christians . They hated the WORD of God and did everything in their power to destroy it and replace it with a corrupted version. If you knew the Bible then you would know this verse as well. Psalms 138:2 kjv "I will worship toward thy holy temple, and praise thy name for thy lovingkindness and for thy truth: for thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name." WHOOPS ,,,, you again do not know what your talking about. I find silly gooses like you all the time and their shallow knowledge of what is TRUTH and what is a LIE. You can stick with your "god" . It is not the God that some of us worship. Most of us CAME out from amongst them and we touch not the UNCLEAN thing. But you love it.

Don't curse, read kjv or American KJv which I recommend

@@FlawlessBreed meh