The ONLY 3 Lenses You Need For The Canon R50!

  Рет қаралды 89,984

Adam Harig

Adam Harig

6 ай бұрын

Grab my new ESSENTIALS Lightroom Preset Pack! 📷 foxtailshop.com/products/esse...
If I could only have 3 lenses for my Canon R50, I would pick these! This kit pretty much covers every focal length you need for great looking photos and videos all for around $1000 total.
Get the 10-18mm lens here 👇
geni.us/uzxr44B
Get the 50mm here 👇
geni.us/d1gi0
Get the 100-400mm here 👇
geni.us/HyQP
Get the R50 here👇
geni.us/4LRU
Learn more about the 10-18mm: • Canon RF-S 10-18mm vs ...
Learn more about the 50mm: • Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 | ...
Learn more about the 100-400mm: • Canon RF 100-400mm | T...
My other channel: / @foxtailwhipz
Get Great Deals On Used Camera Gear at KEH! www.shareasale.com/u.cfm?d=60...
Get TubeBuddy To Grow Your Channel: www.tubebuddy.com/FOXTAILWHIPZ
Instagram: @adamharig_
Video Edited By: Christopher Murray
Contact: chrisam6670@gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Gear I Recommend:
Cameras Under $100: • 5 Awesome Cameras Unde...
Cameras Under $500: • 5 Amazing Cameras For ...
Cinema Cameras Under $500: • Best Budget Cinema Cam...
Cinema Cameras Under $1000: • Best Budget Cinema Cam...
Favorite Budget Camera: amzn.to/41axLCp
Favorite Budget Lens: amzn.to/3XJcaOG
Great Lens Adapter: amzn.to/3IiBepY
Great Wireless Mic: amzn.to/3KlnJbC
Do-It-All Tripod: amzn.to/3xHI6YZ
My Gear:
Cameras
My KZfaq Camera: amzn.to/3Dkd0Ln
Budget KZfaq Camera: amzn.to/3RNHkBK
My Photo Camera: amzn.to/3B7pKSx
Lenses
My A Roll Lens: amzn.to/3Dffnz1
Wide Angle Lens: amzn.to/3U1GByK
Portrait Lens: amzn.to/3RRTdXt
Other Gear
Tripod: amzn.to/3ElcFaX
Travel Tripod: amzn.to/3xHI6YZ
Mini Tripod: amzn.to/3SaEAin
Microphone: amzn.to/3qy7gWo
Editing Computer: shorturl.at/CP028
Headphones: amzn.to/3B5Kvyf
Mouse: amzn.to/3RPp1fC
Gimbal: amzn.to/3L5wsgp
Main Studio Light: amzn.to/3xdfB5M
Accent Lights: amzn.to/3xfqNPf
AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE: Some of the links used in the description are affiliate links, so if you purchase through them I may be compensated.
------------------------------------------------------------------
#r50 #best #lenses

Пікірлер: 117
@adamharig
@adamharig 5 ай бұрын
Grab my new ESSENTIALS Lightroom Preset Pack! 📷 foxtailshop.com/products/essentials-preset-pack
@preparationoftheelect2023
@preparationoftheelect2023 2 ай бұрын
Hey bro, I've left a couple comments, hopefully you see them, I need help with getting a affordable and quality lens for talking head content on YT, basically I want a wide view, like the class KZfaqr look with a blurry background, with me in focus, I'm a super noob, any direction on a decent lens for this would be great please, I plan to buy 1 necessary lens tomorrow
@ashjcoronado
@ashjcoronado 5 ай бұрын
Pretty nice set but I’d add a small super zoom to the list for travel and walk around general purpose photography, the 18-150mm RF-S kit lens is quite good for a kit lens.
@coach_yo
@coach_yo 5 ай бұрын
Thanks for showing the R50 some love. Would love to see what a more extreme kitted out rig would look like
@DeSireeAlicea19
@DeSireeAlicea19 6 ай бұрын
Thanks for continuing to make canon camera content!! It’s hard to find nowadays!
@mlyles3154
@mlyles3154 2 ай бұрын
Thank you for this detailed, yet brief overview!
@Kevinskanaal
@Kevinskanaal 6 ай бұрын
I'd replace the 50mm with the 35mm F1.8 macro IS STM. It does depend on the use case of course but for most portraits etc, the 50mm 1.8 is just too close up if you want to shoot full body. I tried both and ended up returning the 50mm. The 35mm is sharper than the 50, has Image stabilization and can actually do some macro work if you ever want to experiment with that. The rest of the video I agree with fully. I have this setup along with the RF 35mm F1.8, RF-s 18-45 kit lens and RF-s 55-210 lens.
@gregp74
@gregp74 5 ай бұрын
Agreed on the 50mm. It's a nice budget lens and I got one to go along with my new R50 body. I hadn't taken into account the 1.6 and it ended up being a bit much for me taking pics of the wife and kids indoors -- I had to stand in the next room to fit them in the frame. It's going back and I have the 28mm one coming today. I'm hoping that one's a little better for indoors and just general purpose. I could always try the 35mm also. I'm also considering the 10-18mm recommended here. I reckon I could match that up with an 18-45mm kit lens (Like New ones are cheap on MPB) and they should do everything I'd need casually.
@Spike_147
@Spike_147 3 ай бұрын
⁠@@gregp74how’s the 28 mm?
@35259edgarboudaher
@35259edgarboudaher 2 ай бұрын
The 24mm f1.8 is pretty good as well.
@gregp74
@gregp74 2 ай бұрын
​@@Spike_147 I only tried the 28mm briefly. It seemed to work well. Before the return period on my R50 was up I took it back and got a full frame R8. My lens needs with that were a bit different so I returned the 28mm as well. With the new camera I've been mostly sticking with the 50mm f1.8 and the 35mm f1.8 IS. Those two seem do a good job and I've got the 24-105 f4-7.1 (not as good but it's convenient at times.)
@Spike_147
@Spike_147 2 ай бұрын
@@gregp74 Thank you! Planning to buy 35mm
@efreutel
@efreutel 3 ай бұрын
Great survey. Many thanks!
@tender.branson
@tender.branson 4 ай бұрын
I bought Sigma 18-35 1.8 and so far this is my main (and the only) lens to go with R50. I think it makes sense to also have 1st and 3rd, thanks.
@gnorsovannara
@gnorsovannara 3 ай бұрын
Is it heavy?
@sohpiepink80
@sohpiepink80 Ай бұрын
thank you for this!
@helmhamburgerhand
@helmhamburgerhand 3 ай бұрын
It also really depends on how you shoot. Large apertures are a must if you dont shoot on a mount or at anything outside good bright lighting. The R50 is well noted to absolutely shit the bed at moderate to low light.
@wilsonnkwan
@wilsonnkwan Ай бұрын
My three will be Nifty50 for potrait, RF 16mm for the ultra wide, good for street, the last one a bit tricky, I'll go for 70-200 f4L for the range. Do have to take note, because R50 is on crop sensor, which means, whatever widest apeture that we have on the lens have to x1.6 which mean the 16mm is F4.5, 50mm is F2.9, and the 70-200 is on F6.4 which means the bokeh background seperation will not be as good, but have to make do since it's an R50.
@jvalverde
@jvalverde 13 күн бұрын
Thanks for the advise :) Just got a r50 on april and is real fun, might get a 50mm :)
@FeatureMoments
@FeatureMoments 5 ай бұрын
Being from Michigan, loved seeing pic from mackinaw City in Mackinac Island.
@BeccsResende
@BeccsResende 15 сағат бұрын
My mom bought one kislux and she loves it. It had been there for over 10 years when she went out with it.
@zegzbrutal
@zegzbrutal 2 ай бұрын
I run RF16, RF28 and RF100-400. If I'm sure I don't need tele, I swap 100-400 with adapting EF Sigma 17-70mm f2.8-4 contemporary. When the Sigma 18-50 RF version arrives, I'll trade that out.
@TheViperMan
@TheViperMan 2 ай бұрын
The 10-18mm is an RF-S lens. Which means. It's an APS-C lens. It will give a 1.6x cropped image on full sensors.
@Band-Boy723
@Band-Boy723 19 күн бұрын
Could you please elaborate what this means? I’m just now getting into photography.
@tayyabmuhammad4144
@tayyabmuhammad4144 3 ай бұрын
Out of all which one would you prefer for shooting indoor videos?
@martinax-po8rj
@martinax-po8rj 4 ай бұрын
and does these lenses are good for video?
@h.o.j2375
@h.o.j2375 4 ай бұрын
The 100-400 only make sense for wild life photography, I can’t see it being use much for any other genre. It also doesn’t make sense on the R50, apsc for wild life probably would be better with R7, the higher quality apsc in canon system. The focusing is too slow on R50, I have one I would know.
@pkerry12
@pkerry12 3 ай бұрын
ok in Australian dollars including tax in the price its $599 for the ultra wide, $325 for the f1.8 prime lens and $1179 for the 100mm-400mm your looking at 2103 AUD which is $1373 USD in the grand space of things I guess its not bad but these lens my question is are they high quality?
@juanrestrepo7973
@juanrestrepo7973 3 ай бұрын
@adamharig What is the lens that you can most recommend for product photography
@ally8490
@ally8490 6 ай бұрын
Adam - Thanks for all your videos they are super helpful. I am looking for a macro lens for my cannon ae-1 program and wondering if you had a few suggestions? My subjects would be insects, flowers, shells. I want to get super close to the objects picking up detail. Thanks in advance.
@adamharig
@adamharig 6 ай бұрын
Thanks so much! I would recommend the Canon FD 50mm f3.5 macro, as well as the FD 70-210mm for getting great macro shots with the AE1. I’ve used them both on digital for macro photos and they’re great!
@ally8490
@ally8490 6 ай бұрын
@@adamharig if you had to choose between the two, which would win?
@alejandrodeluna2425
@alejandrodeluna2425 2 ай бұрын
Thank you! Keep making content on r50 please 😩👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👊🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@johnwinter6061
@johnwinter6061 24 күн бұрын
Tend to agree it's a good set up and not overly expensive. Possibly consider say RF 24-105 FF zoom instead of the 50mm prime. The differences in IQ between primes and zooms is slowly disappearing. Also consider the possible loss of pixels when editing a prime versus using an ideal zoom setting and keeping all those pixels! My comparison of my Tamron 18-270 zoom I bought 15 years ago v a cheap canon 50mm prime showed the Tamron was better! So I ditched the nifty50. If you swap to FF, then the RF100-400 can be kept and used. I have a Canon RP (FF) with the RF 24-240 on it and a Canon R50 (APS-C) with the RF 100-400. Both lenses work with either body. Bit dearer than the option shown but far cheaper than a lot of alternatives. Even APS-C cameras are getting as dear as FF! I HATE changing lenses. Exposure to elements. Time taken. Fiddling around with camera bag/s. I treat the ability to change a lens as the ability to permanently fit a lens of my choice for my type of work. I've been using zoom lenses for 40 years. All the old arguments against them are becoming rather mute. The differences in IQ are disappearing. I've followed all the debates about FF v APS-C. Back in the day it was large format roll film v 35mm cassette film. 35mm won out.
@bram0707
@bram0707 10 күн бұрын
which one is best for street photography is it 16mm or 10-18 mm ?
@T0lpo
@T0lpo 17 күн бұрын
what is that thing around your canon r50?
@balajisanthanam9164
@balajisanthanam9164 6 ай бұрын
I thought the third one is 24-105mm.
@MiGzZ_X1
@MiGzZ_X1 4 ай бұрын
Question what is that thing around the camera to make it easier to hold?
@adamharig
@adamharig 4 ай бұрын
It’s a Smallrig Cage :)
@jstrang01
@jstrang01 7 күн бұрын
I just bought the Canon RF 600mm f/11 IS STM Lens. I hope it works well with the R50
@adamharig
@adamharig 7 күн бұрын
Nice, let me know what you think of it!
@jstrang01
@jstrang01 4 сағат бұрын
@@adamharig im really enjoying the lens, im getting amazing wildlife photos with it. And moon pictures
@GadgetGeeks
@GadgetGeeks 5 ай бұрын
Good review
@adamharig
@adamharig 5 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@abbiemerker3126
@abbiemerker3126 5 ай бұрын
Does the 10-18mm lens convert your r50 into full frame? Or would you need something else for that
@lukecollins7965
@lukecollins7965 4 ай бұрын
You need a different camera.
@thelonehiker4698
@thelonehiker4698 4 ай бұрын
Which camera lens would you recommend for better video stabilization?
@stephenourada3217
@stephenourada3217 4 ай бұрын
The R50 has I believe 4 stops on stabilization in video mode. If you purchase an L IS USM lens like the 15-35 f2.8 you will get up to another 5 stops. Hope this helps.
@joshuajohn74
@joshuajohn74 4 ай бұрын
​@@stephenourada3217it costs more than my car
@morgantrevino4881
@morgantrevino4881 24 күн бұрын
I have the EF versions of all three of these, just going to buy the official adapter.
@karinunley9393
@karinunley9393 10 күн бұрын
Does the adapter add a lot of bulk to your setup?
@martinax-po8rj
@martinax-po8rj 4 ай бұрын
when you zoom the camera with 100-400mm does it losses quality when you zoom?
@JAF2991
@JAF2991 4 ай бұрын
No, it’s not a digital zoom like a phones zoom
@Jimmyageek
@Jimmyageek 6 ай бұрын
The only 3 lens are 10-18mm 16mm and 50mm
@justinburley8659
@justinburley8659 6 ай бұрын
So, you just don't shoot telephoto then?
@gwramim4807
@gwramim4807 5 ай бұрын
10-18 and 24-105 if you have the budget with a 50mm
@glpro2696
@glpro2696 3 ай бұрын
For full frame : 28mm , 50mm For apsc : 16mm , 35mm
@glpro2696
@glpro2696 2 ай бұрын
@@MegaCasperC 18-150 its a pretty good lens for all around use...i wouldnt reccomend the 10-18 due to the fact that it has dark aperture
@josephmongo91
@josephmongo91 24 күн бұрын
😂😂
@nnannaprince
@nnannaprince 3 ай бұрын
So I'm stuck in between buying the EFS 10-18 or the RF for my M50. I already have an adapter (Viltrox speed booster), considering I can drop the aperture in the EFs one, what will you advise me to do?
@cre8r61
@cre8r61 3 ай бұрын
EFS lenses don't fit with the Viltrox speed booster (back of the lens protrudes on the EFS lenses) and RF mount lenses are incompatible with the M50. You can use a standard EF to M Mount adapter without the speed booster lens element for the EFS 10-18. I'm loving the 10-18mm on my R50
@nnannaprince
@nnannaprince 3 ай бұрын
@@cre8r61 thank you 😊
@E-Doze
@E-Doze 5 ай бұрын
What is the best lens if i want to do youtube videos with R50 please, a lens that isolate the background and still sharp and get good frame without pushing the camera 6 feet away like the 50mm 1.8
@stephensmith5443
@stephensmith5443 5 ай бұрын
A good option would be the RF-24 is f1.8 or a cheaper alternative the RF-28 f2.8
@vicky83
@vicky83 5 ай бұрын
18-45 is good and more enough
@user-pb1yh1qp7c
@user-pb1yh1qp7c 4 ай бұрын
Bro r50 kid lans video rivew
@user-ly3hn4lh9o
@user-ly3hn4lh9o 4 ай бұрын
Does anyone know how to make the background blurry I have r50 and 1 lens which is 18-45 mm
@andrewf5390
@andrewf5390 4 ай бұрын
You need a fast lens, kit lens at f/4.5 just won’t do it. The 35/1.8, which shot at f/1.8 or f/2 will blur backgrounds nicely, as will the 50mm f/1.8.
@rcman000
@rcman000 Ай бұрын
Lower F stop gives you blurred background like F1.8​@andrewf5390
@pulkit2709
@pulkit2709 2 ай бұрын
Although I am not buying them very soon but here in India its more than 1300 USD. But surely buy those one day :)
@jimpway
@jimpway 4 ай бұрын
Hi, I’m new to photography and I have the canon R50 and would love to take real estate photos, what lens would you recommend?
@stephenourada3217
@stephenourada3217 4 ай бұрын
For real estate I would purchase the 16mm f/2.8 or the 10-18mm that Adam recommends. The R50 has a 1.6 crop factor so the 16mm equals 25.6mm. You need a wide lens to capture the majority of the images used in real estate.
@jimpway
@jimpway 3 ай бұрын
@@stephenourada3217 thank you for that information.
@cre8r61
@cre8r61 3 ай бұрын
If you're comfortable with manual lenses have a look at the TTArtisan ƒ2 10mm or adapting the EFS 10-18mm ƒ4.5-5.6 are great options for wide angle lenses
@GabesGarage
@GabesGarage Ай бұрын
A better question is what camera you use to make this video ?
@adamharig
@adamharig Ай бұрын
I used a Sony A7S iii to record it :)
@GabesGarage
@GabesGarage Ай бұрын
@@adamharig which camera you think is better for recording videos the A7 iii or the R50?
@vicky83
@vicky83 5 ай бұрын
I just bought R50.. And I'm loving it ❤
@gray4043
@gray4043 5 ай бұрын
How was it? Just bought mine. I am coming from an m50 mkii dunno if it was a smart decision 😅
@vicky83
@vicky83 5 ай бұрын
@@gray4043 Try R50
@preparationoftheelect2023
@preparationoftheelect2023 25 күн бұрын
Is the biggest lens here good for astrophotography? If not then what is a really good lens for astrophotography for the Canon R50?
@Aneliuse
@Aneliuse 14 күн бұрын
In practice none of those lenses are good for astro. Their apertures are too high, save for the 50, but that one is neither wide enough for milky way or long enough for any other objects.
@preparationoftheelect2023
@preparationoftheelect2023 14 күн бұрын
@@Aneliuse whats a good lens that's affordable for astrophotography fam? For the Canon R50
@Aneliuse
@Aneliuse 13 күн бұрын
@@preparationoftheelect2023 For milkyway: You can either get a 16mm f2.8, which should be around 26mm. Thats not bad, but not really wide. Your other choice is use a samyang 10mm (EF mount) and adapt to RF mount. If its for astrophotography you will be using a tripod anyway, and manual focus doesnt take long either. Canon have allowed sigma and tamron to make lenses for aps-c, so afaik, they are working on a bunch of these ultrawide lenses that work natively for the RF mount(like the sigma 10-18 f2.8). I dont know when they will be released, but you should take a look a it. If you want to take images of smaller objects, like the andromeda galaxy, youre going to have few more options because of the crop factor.
@KyleDresser
@KyleDresser 4 ай бұрын
very heplful
@Dudulewami
@Dudulewami 4 ай бұрын
Please how switch between manual focus and auto focus I fix the focus? I've just bought the R50 camera and 50mm lens but the button on the lens does not affect the focus. I know I'm supposed to do it from the camera but I don't know how. Please help.
@stephenourada3217
@stephenourada3217 4 ай бұрын
Go into your menu. Select AF page 1. Under AF operation select Servo. Toggle down and there will be several options for AF I usually use 1 point AF.Turn on whole area tracking servo AF. Under subject to detect pick what you are shooting, people, animals, vehicle.Next enable eye detection. Finally under focus mode select AF and you should be good.
@Helvis23
@Helvis23 3 ай бұрын
I am a beginner. What is a good zoom for a Canon R50.?I was thinking of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM but I understand it is really dark at 7.1 and not really good for low light
@mac_Ta
@mac_Ta 4 ай бұрын
So would these 3 replace the previous list of 4? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q7h3maaQ27S1YYk.html
@Jeffrey_2005
@Jeffrey_2005 4 ай бұрын
Who is better 10mm vs 50 mm
@sushenpeiris4986
@sushenpeiris4986 4 ай бұрын
50mm is better in my opinion
@stephenourada3217
@stephenourada3217 4 ай бұрын
Depends on what you are shooting. With the 1.6 crop the 10mm equals a 16mm good for wide angle. The 50mm equals a 80mm better for medium distance. Having an f1.8 on the 50 is nice.
@RoyOlsen
@RoyOlsen Ай бұрын
That 10-18 lens is not an RF lens it's an RF-S :(
@dima1353
@dima1353 4 ай бұрын
I can only agree with 50mm. partially. But overall this is a very convenient and obvious set. Looks almost like an advertisement. You definitely show budget lenses. So we are addressing this to people who save money, right? So the first thing is an adapter. And the second thing is used market. Let's use imagination, as well as knowledge from many tests: 1) RF 10-18 is not exactly the thing that squeezes all the juice out of the sensor. At 10mm it crops out about 20% of the frame to even out its 10% distortion. I am really a big opponent of this “smartphone” approach. Imagine that a person has all this hidden magic in his smartphone and he's tired of it, he really wants to have control now. And what does he get with this lens? Stretched pixels, unused sensor potential in the name of compactness. EF 10-18 is not the most reliable lens, but a good copy will give a more honest result and you will still be able to use all the 22x14mm area of sensor you paid for when you bought the camera. This lens may not be so sharp wide open, but all this stuff with stretching doesn’t give any chance to corners in a new lens, closing the aperture is useless. And besides, you will see additional consequences during processing. 2) The RF 50 is an excellent lens with a wonderful bonus in the form of a minimum focusing distance, but... If there is an adapter, you can also consider the EF version. It will be cheaper. You just need to remember that RF cameras do not support linear manual focus on EF STM lenses. 3) I don't like 100-400 at all. This is 70-300, which was made longer and darker. This is what Canon is doing with its telephoto lenses now. And specifically with this lens, especially on crop, I don’t like it. This is not a very sharp lens and some tests show that the EF 70-300 usm IS II at this pixel density can be sharper even after a crop to 400mm field of view. Even if this is not the case, and the 100-400 has some advantage in detail when shooting distant objects, it will not be very significant. But the 70-300 is a more versatile lens, and at the same time it at least "almost" contains the 100-400 in itself. And you can't say the opposite. And yes, you can find 70-300 cheaper. I don't know. Maybe there are some happy people who just go to stores and buy what the sellers offer them. Do they need guides? In any case, I have not seen such people in my area. Most photographers I know make the most of their budget and yes, EF was and remains a savior. Without EF, it will not yet be possible to spend money wisely.
@dima1353
@dima1353 4 ай бұрын
In addition, I consider it necessary to criticize the choice of focal lengths itself. 1) An ultra-wide-angle zoom can hardly be called a must-have lens. I constantly see beginners selling such lenses. It's a cool toy, but in a practical sense it's a much more niche tool than many suspect. What I consider a more practical lens... is a regular boring kit zoom. And again EF comes to the rescue. Because what is being offered now with mirrorless cameras is the same underdesigned nonsense as 10-18. Usual EF-s18-55 of the latest generations are pretty good. And they're dirt cheap. 2) It's hard to argue against 50, but I can suggest 35 as an alternative. There is a hidden gem on the EF-s mount and it is a 35 2.8 macro IS stm. Yes, it is darker, but it is sharp wide open, has a more versatile focal length as an “everyday prime” and has stabilization. Really cool underrated stuff. Don't forget about ef/ef-s pancakes too. Yes, yes aperture. But again, 50mm on a crop may turn out to be a less convinient focal length outside of portrait photography. 3) Does people really need tele-zoom lens right away ? I'm not sure. Really. This is a cool toy, but at the same time a very specific tool. And the longer, the more specific. And even if you want a telephoto lens, there are safer and more versatile solutions, such as 70-200 4. The first version with a stabilizer can be found at a good price. It's sharp as a razor. And you won't lose money if you sell it right away.
@Alkansa
@Alkansa Ай бұрын
i am a beginner in lenses; i own a r50; i want to make yt talking head videos at a medium distance ; which lens should i buy - 1) rf lens 2)sigma 16mm f/1.4 and ef mount 3)any ef lens + mount can you please recommend me my first lens?
@pkerry12
@pkerry12 3 ай бұрын
wow those lens are expensive for the quality they are.... I remember when you could get a 50mm prime lens from canon for less than 50 bucks.
@dct124
@dct124 5 ай бұрын
Why do y'all KZfaqrs keep pushing that shallow dof is somehow a professional look?
@andrejcupac7359
@andrejcupac7359 5 ай бұрын
Maybe cause it is? Got nothing to do with KZfaqrs it’s just how cinematic footage is made in general
@dct124
@dct124 5 ай бұрын
@@andrejcupac7359 Nope. Shallow dof is used roughly 10% to 20% of the time.
@andrejcupac7359
@andrejcupac7359 5 ай бұрын
@@dct124 obviously, but that’s literally irrelevant to the point. Are you saying a shallow DOF isn’t professional looking? No ones saying having a flatter look isn’t professional just that more depth looks nice…
@dct124
@dct124 5 ай бұрын
@@andrejcupac7359 It's not. If it were, entire movies or rather 80%-90% of a films would be shot using shallow depth of field, yet it's the reverse. That's like trying to say a Wes Anderson film isn't cinematic. Just some cinematic masterpieces in recent history. The Hateful 8, The Revenant, 1917, Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, Inception, Interstellar, Oppenheimer, Dune, Everything All At Once, Poor Things Are the scenes with Shallow Depth of Field more cinematic than those without? No, and vice versa. What makes an image or scene more or less cinematic is the LIGHTING. Lighting has the largest impact. Location, composition, framing are secondary. Color, contrast, sharpness, movement next. Your camera, lens, and equipment are the least important in making something look cinematic. That's why you can grab an old camera, a f5.6, f8 lens and make something look cinematic. You can't throw a fast lens at a problem and think it's going to magically turn garbage into anything resembling something cinematic. If you speak to any good DP, they'll tell you its lighting. People say Shallow DOF b/c it's a bad habit and my point is that KZfaqrs i.e. influencers perpetuate the false narrative. I'm done on the topic, it's a waste of time. You're not going to shallow dof your way into cinematic shots.
@andrejcupac7359
@andrejcupac7359 5 ай бұрын
@@dct124 thanks for the info, yeah you're right actually. not to mention how much money you'd have to spend to get f1.8 or f2.4 on any lense. i guess the youtubers also fooled me
@StarLightDotPhotos
@StarLightDotPhotos Ай бұрын
I disagree on the 10-18mm. The IQ is trash. Instead I would recommend the 16mm f/2.8
@aeyde
@aeyde 6 ай бұрын
these shitty dark zooms are so useless. you need perfect sun to shoot at f8 especially on crop sensor what a joke
@justinburley8659
@justinburley8659 6 ай бұрын
You gotta remember who this video is for. R50 users are either new to photography or doing it on a budget. The best way to make a budget lens is to darken the aperture. (especially on zooms) tbf tho, the 50mm and the 100-400mm are super sharp for their price. The 100-400mm is almost perfect except for the aperture
@superstringsbro
@superstringsbro 6 ай бұрын
4.5 = garbage
@Kevinskanaal
@Kevinskanaal 6 ай бұрын
Not necessarily, you just need a lot of light to make it work decently well. I've shot great photo's with a 55-210 f5-7.1, under the right conditions. All a matter of perspective. This channel is mostly targeted to the beginner hobbyist, so for the budget this list (maybe apart from the 50mm, since you can get the 35 for not that much more and that is a way better lens imo) is great.
@justinburley8659
@justinburley8659 6 ай бұрын
@@Kevinskanaal the 35mm is $300 more. That’s way he’s recommending the 50mm
@Kevinskanaal
@Kevinskanaal 6 ай бұрын
@@justinburley8659 I’d rather spend 300 more (which it isn’t, more like 200/250) for a lens with all the benefits listed, mostly being usable for portraits in non deserted and wide open areas.
@tender.branson
@tender.branson 4 ай бұрын
​@@Kevinskanaalsuch as?
@Kevinskanaal
@Kevinskanaal 4 ай бұрын
Image stabilisation, sharper, easier to use for portraits in busy areas. Macro capabilities as well.
Top 4 Budget Lenses for Canon R50, R7, R10 & R100!
17:55
FoxTailWhipz
Рет қаралды 97 М.
Rokinon 35mm DSX RF Mount Cinema Lens
3:19
The End of Discussion
Рет қаралды 8
50 YouTubers Fight For $1,000,000
41:27
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 200 МЛН
Llegó al techo 😱
00:37
Juan De Dios Pantoja
Рет қаралды 53 МЛН
Double Stacked Pizza @Lionfield @ChefRush
00:33
albert_cancook
Рет қаралды 85 МЛН
EVOLUTION OF ICE CREAM 😱 #shorts
00:11
Savage Vlogs
Рет қаралды 4,8 МЛН
LX Model T-50 modified to be a SU57 - first flight
5:35
Flight6677
Рет қаралды 16
STOP using the wrong APERTURE.
18:46
Mads Peter Iversen
Рет қаралды 152 М.
The Nelons Gospel PC 12 Plane Crash Wyoming 26 July 2024
7:31
blancolirio
Рет қаралды 414 М.
6 Months In... The GOOD and The BAD | Canon EOS r50
12:08
Andrew Bentley
Рет қаралды 67 М.
CANON R50 (6 MONTHS REVIEW) - PROS & CONS
4:46
Fakhruddin Ismail
Рет қаралды 1,1 М.
The World wasn't ready for these Crazy Lenses
12:18
Cong Thanh
Рет қаралды 201 М.
Pilot Tries Dangerous & Illegal Approach!
13:21
Pilot Debrief
Рет қаралды 146 М.
Sony Xperia 1 VI | Pro Photographer TEST
16:47
The Visual Life
Рет қаралды 463 М.
BEST Sony Cameras For Beginners (2024 Buyers Guide)
14:51
Kraig Pruett
Рет қаралды 244 М.
Во сколько смотришь? Заливаю в 10-22😉
0:36
Юлия Смирнова
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
KARMA AT SCHOOL 🏫 Stop time
0:32
dednahype
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Best Toilet Gadgets and #Hacks you must try!!💩💩
0:49
Poly Holy Yow
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
ToRung short film: i sell watermelon🍉
0:38
ToRung
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Вся страна в очередях, а ты без очереди...
0:52
МиRRные Чувства
Рет қаралды 2,3 МЛН