Correction: According to the original text, Rama actually got extremely raged when the Sea-God did not appear despite his 3 day-long worship dedicated to the god. Then Rama decided to drain the whole sea with his divine arrow and warned the sea-god accordingly. Out of aghast, the sea-god appeared at last and suggested ways to cross the sea. This dramatic chapter is called 'Samudra-Shasana' (A lesson to the sea).
@siddhanthkamath321 Жыл бұрын
Yes.. And i think this was somewhat depicted in the Hanuman animated movie Released around 14 years ago
@venkatramannayak6062 Жыл бұрын
And in aadipurush lord hanuman says kapda tel aag tere baap ki.. jakegi bhi tere baap ki..
@manas9194 Жыл бұрын
binti na mane jaladhi jad, gae teen din beet, bole Ram sakope tab, bhay bin hoe na preet
@rishavraj6973 Жыл бұрын
@@venkatramannayak6062what a stupid tapori dialogue
@TriedRefusedProductions Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the correction
@zero_kool Жыл бұрын
Now we know "why Katappa killed bahubali..." He traveled to the future and saw Adipurush!!
@yashv8199 Жыл бұрын
haha
@shishirjain3562 Жыл бұрын
good one😅😅
@bhargavipba Жыл бұрын
Oh god 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@anukshyarath3069 Жыл бұрын
This makes more sense now... 🤣
@aruneshnandan6759 Жыл бұрын
So true😂
@driquint37 Жыл бұрын
Aamir khan had said "Mahabharata or Ramayana might not let you down but you might let Mahabharata or Ramayana down" He was absolutely correct 💯
@theman-wq1jt Жыл бұрын
Don't take amir's name bro bhakts might bycott you😂
@neerajbaviskar305 Жыл бұрын
Because he knew after LSC that bollywood is incapable of adapting source material properly. Its always a significant downgraden except Kaante.
@cinephile4699 Жыл бұрын
Bollywood is fucking in capable of bringing good movies to the big screen. But these same bollywood releases some good movies and series in digital platforms.💯💯 Why is bollywood like this 😶
@anubhav7547 Жыл бұрын
Yes because these are beyond Bollywood's level of making movies. Only Tollywood should try on these topics 🙏❤️
@ayushkaushik6885 Жыл бұрын
@@theman-wq1jt bhakt's?? Y not jihadi's ??? Are you targeting single religion
@samik_das01 Жыл бұрын
The absolute hypocrisy is when Deepika wore a saffron colored dress for 10 seconds in a 3 mins long song in a 3 hrs long movie the whole media went crazy saying it's an insult to our hindu culture, but now when Adipurush is clearly an insult to our faiths and beliefs about our Ramayan nobody is saying to boycott this movie, is this a joke
@AnotherNPC1234 Жыл бұрын
That sucker Arnab Goswami was defending this movie with #HinduAwakening. Idiot was literally shoving down the movie down the throats of Hindus
@tvaddict6491 Жыл бұрын
The movie I believe is backed by some figures in high places. The credits in the movie apparently thanks them. That should answer your question. All this proves is that audience is always king, no matter what garbage people in politics or movie industry shells out. The audience is smart and knows what to watch
@sheldon3842 Жыл бұрын
People are dumb and uneducated
@ushas7255 Жыл бұрын
I agree... I am not religious but a spiritual person. Even I feel offended looking at how Lord Ram is portrayed! Seriously why wasn't this portrayal stopped by people.
@kg_loves Жыл бұрын
I have a newfound appreciation for the people that do Ram Leela every year in my society. They do 1000 times more justice to Ramayan with their budget props than Adipurush did with such a huge budget.
@Kathakathan11 Жыл бұрын
Never miss that, we had that tradition and they would hire the school ground, but Muslims protested and then it has stopped, now we just have temple readings. 😢 as long as you can watch ram Leela, don’t miss it.
@AnotherNPC1234 Жыл бұрын
@@Kathakathan11 which city is this?
@daphne3631 Жыл бұрын
True that
@darshandesai6061 Жыл бұрын
@Sayonara44373 where did this happen?
@darshandesai6061 Жыл бұрын
Now that I come to think of it ..
@dorkjet Жыл бұрын
Moral of the story---Sometimes you can judge a book by its cover.
@sreenivaskamath4243 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, this does apply here 😅
@paxonite-7bd5 Жыл бұрын
There was no cover because this was a third hand book 😂
@nikolatesla399 Жыл бұрын
@@paxonite-7bd5😂😂😂
@shishya085 Жыл бұрын
🤣🙂
@ishanpaul4672 Жыл бұрын
True
@Javed23022 Жыл бұрын
Yugo Sako travelled to India over 60 times and devoted 10 years of his life to research for animated Ramayan, I would love to know what Om Raut did.
@pr00009 Жыл бұрын
Om raut played temple run and liked its animation
@lalisaslittlewifey6840 Жыл бұрын
That moron just acted a crying scene asking to keep seats for Hanuman ji in the theaters. Hanumanji would feel humiliated to see himself depicted like this!
@rishann Жыл бұрын
Om raut complained why he had to listen bhajans during festivals and made movie just to cash in the sentiments
@thatgurl3126 Жыл бұрын
Googled 😂
@fahds2583 Жыл бұрын
@@pr00009 😂😂😂😂
@Punisher1996 Жыл бұрын
I’m a Christian but I remember watching and rewatching the animated ramayana on Cartoon Network every time it aired but now I’m shocked how that movie managed to pack so much story and lore in 2 hours they should re release that movie intstead of this I would happily watch it it’s so beautiful!
@Inkipinkiponkey-c9o Жыл бұрын
yes❤
@graceebenezer6085 Жыл бұрын
Same, I always sat to watch the movie no matter what.
@Its_BM Жыл бұрын
I think there is a remastered version coming or have released already.
@saumyapathak5865 Жыл бұрын
@@Its_BMI wonder how effective the patch work will be!
@duality4453 Жыл бұрын
Exactly even in a Christian household I used to heartily enjoy Ghototkach, Krishna Animated series, The Hanuman movie etc. I knew Adipurush won't hold up their legacy soon as I saw Prabhas's Raavan like stature and look for the role of Ram and almost childish look of Hanuman, we all literally used to hold air inside the mouth to mimick Hanuman like this
@ALiQMuRShED Жыл бұрын
As a Muslim kid, my curiosity about the various Hindu legends and stories peaked after watching Yugo Sako's animated Ramayana. Good stories draw people in like moths to a flame regardless of faith and beliefs.
@divyansh2890 Жыл бұрын
Come on bruh, everyone's default settings is Hindu on the indian subcontinent
@mikanjjj6357 Жыл бұрын
Very true!
@apoorvverma574 Жыл бұрын
@@divyansh2890 you are a very disturbed person.
@tiger3091 Жыл бұрын
@@apoorvverma574why? He stated a fact. Teri jali kyun?
@kaustubhkotkar3597 Жыл бұрын
@@apoorvverma574 tu angrejo ki chatne wala lag raha hai
@renudeepak1349 Жыл бұрын
Those who are defending Prabhas must understand that lead actors in this country always possess some kind of creative control over the film. And there's no way he couldn't have known that a bullsh!t was being made instead of Ramayan
@AniruddhD Жыл бұрын
So S.S Rajamoauli did things in Bahubali as Prabhas dictated?
@PaulAllen6304 Жыл бұрын
Exactly. He took 120 crores(1/5th of the budget) but had no creative control? Those who believe that should go back to school
@amithabv1060 Жыл бұрын
@@AniruddhD he could've given his inputs about how crappy the product being developed was.
@dishwasher69 Жыл бұрын
@@AniruddhDmaybe because bahubali was perfect and wasn't bullshit
@Anuj111ify Жыл бұрын
This film shot with motion capturing technology.. who knows director would have said everything will be fix in vfx..
@ShashiKumar-jm5bi Жыл бұрын
A seat was left out for Hanuman ji in the theatres. Let's hope he doesn't see the movie because if he does , Lanka won't be the only thing burned down by him😂.
@ManushriAnand Жыл бұрын
Lol😂
@Farhan-Dabhoi Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@seemonjena659 Жыл бұрын
Totally in love this comment🤣🤣🤣
@sheldor523 Жыл бұрын
ye badiya tha guru
@janardhanat6030 Жыл бұрын
Awesome 😁🤪
@debadritaghosh8659 Жыл бұрын
It's amazing to see how a 1992 Animation film with the budget of less than INR 1Cr (0.67 crores to be precise) by Ghibli studio gives competition to a 2023 film with a budget of 700 crore, and still wins without a question. Goodness prevails!
@PoojaSingh-sv8ul Жыл бұрын
The fact that Manoj Muntashir and Prabhas both have been integral part of Bahubali and Adipurush but it's the director/creator and his vision which makes it a success or a failure. My respect for Rajamouli has levelled up so much . He did not change his vision for the youth and made a Marvel movie out of it instead New Gen adored him for his perspective and story telling. Thats why he is where he is.
@antoneczarajanayagam357 Жыл бұрын
Prabhas has made one point very clear with his last 3 movies: don't expect too much. Right after Bahubali, audience thought a star is born, but the reality is a star is fading.
@erenbritania2117 Жыл бұрын
Only saalar
@snehalkhatri9357 Жыл бұрын
@@erenbritania2117 Crap
@1ne7evN Жыл бұрын
ok drink some sambaar and sleep
@anandthethriller4362 Жыл бұрын
Dude brought 140crs opening with this one.
@sukanyakalita7263 Жыл бұрын
@@anandthethriller4362opening acchi hone se movie acchi nahi ho jati. Movie dekhna toh jaenge hi. Uske baad hi toh pata chalega movie acchi hain ya buri. Aur adipurush jaisi bakwas movie aaj tak kisina nahi banayi hogi. Aur prabhas jaisa kharab acting kisine ne kiya hoga.
@Dr.SyedSaifAbbasNaqvi Жыл бұрын
The Legend of Prince Rama by the Japanese animator Yugo Sako released in 1993 still remains my most favourite mainly because I grew up watching that. Loads of childhood nostalgia associated with it. Never gonna ruin my experience with this one.
@TriedRefusedProductions Жыл бұрын
You know what’s crazy: if they adapted the same screenplay in the live action format: it would have worked wonders!
@COHOPDey Жыл бұрын
I hope they release this in India. But I have full faith on T series that they won't let this happen.
@petyrparker Жыл бұрын
I watched it again yesterday to cleanse my eyes 😊
@poojasikdar3583 Жыл бұрын
@@TriedRefusedProductionsagreed!
@drkrkshubh66 Жыл бұрын
The legend of prince rama was gem ❤❤❤❤
@_WhatsGoingOn_ Жыл бұрын
Don't get me wrong here, but I think Pravas would look perfect as Ravan in Ramayan. His face card could match all the characteristics if he can act and portray it well enough.
@daphne3631 Жыл бұрын
That's something to think about.
@Vk-sk7nm Жыл бұрын
Obviously. Both of them having Dravidian genetics.
@lordblanck7923 Жыл бұрын
Nah he looks like a fierce person by face. Ram was almost a beautiful person with hints of manliness on his face. This one looks like he is gonna explode in a second
@mcmohitchauhan21 Жыл бұрын
Yes, Prabhas would have been much better for the role of Ravana. I think, Hrithik would have been an awesome choice for Lord Ram, though
@Anayaah421 Жыл бұрын
@@mcmohitchauhan21Hrithik is very expressive. Ram was a very gentle character. Maybe Shahid Kapoor? (In his Vivah/ Jab We met character profile)
@krishna_- Жыл бұрын
NOBODY might believe this, but the old movie "sree rama rajyam" made by balayya is on actually another level with the detailings, the gorgeousness of nayanatara as sita is unmatchable
@pranathirkovvuri1087 Жыл бұрын
Back then I was furious that they changed the storyline and brought in Hanuman to assist Sita in the ashram but omg that is so much more better than whatever this Adipurush was....
@JasthiCS Жыл бұрын
It was Bapu. Be made Seeta kalyanam and Sampurna ramayanam. That Gangavataranam song is ❤🔥
@Nishanth_mementomori Жыл бұрын
I'm convinced that Om Raut did not make Tanhaji... It was 100% ghost directed by Ajay Devgn I refuse to believe the same director made both these movies Edit : I'm nowhere saying Tanhaji is some masterpiece of filmmaking 😂 but compared to this shite, Tanhaji feels like LOTR
@abhishekdarjee7069 Жыл бұрын
Lmao
@TriedRefusedProductions Жыл бұрын
A lot of people are claiming Devgn having ghost directed the film 👀
@thethreespikes9737 Жыл бұрын
Action in that is evident that its shadow directed by Ajay Devgan
@anandraghuvanshi3208 Жыл бұрын
Yes obviously om raut might have acted like an assistant.. Sitting behind camera when devgn is pe performing scenes
@blueblessingmoon3421 Жыл бұрын
Finally someone said it.Thank you for saying this.The thing i have been saying for a while.
@kashutosh9132 Жыл бұрын
4:25 - I actually feel they need 7 parts to do complete justice to the Ramayana. There are 7 khand in Ramayan so I think, we will be needing atleast 7 movies(as movie format) to showcase the story of Ramayana(even if we exclude Bala khand and Uttar khand) where all major charcters can have their own arcs(even if little) 1. Ayodhya Kand 2. Aranya Kand 3. Kisiskhindha Kand 4. A full movie dedicated to Ravan,his rise and his kingdom 5. Sundar kand 6. Yudha Kand Part 1 7. Yudh Kand Part 2 See,As Movie parts- 1.Ayodhya Kand - Covering the poltics of Kosala(manthra-kaikeyi),Ram ji accompanying Vishawamitra to kill the rakshahs(Tadka) and then Ram ji going to swayamwar and then Ram and Sita marriage Due to politics Ram ji sent for vanvash and the climax ends with Bharat-Milap Total family drama kind of part 1 2.Aranaya Kand Here we will see Ram ji meeting Sabri,some sages and his life in vanvash Suparnkha attacks Sita ji,Laksham retaliates Suparnkha brothers Khar-Dushan attacks Ram ji and Ram ji wins Then in the end Ravan with marichi help kidnaps Sita and movie ends 3. Kiskindha kand Starts with Jatyu sacrifice told in flashback kind Many charcters Sugriva,bali,jamvanth,Hanuman ji and Angad are introduced Ram ji helps Sugriva taking back the kingdom(where a brief civil war will be seen) and then movie ends with Vanars sent across the globe to search for Sita ji 4. Lanka kand(named by me) Here Ravan and family and his rise to power is shown Like a prequel showcasing Ravan's past war campaigns 5. Sundar Kand The main protagonist is Hanuman ji The full movie covers Hanuman ji journey where He searches for Sita ji, foughts multiple rakshahs and ends with Hanuman ji giving ring to Sita ji,killing akshaykumar and burning Lanka to ashes Hanuman ji takes this information to Ram ji and Ram Setu built in the end(within a song) 6. Yudh Kand Part 1 Angad is sent for sandhi but Ravan refuses and war starts Kumbhkaran will be main antagonist (with other mini villains are Ravan sons) Movie ends with meghnath appearing in last 5 minutes and mortally wounding Ram-Lakshaman with NagPash 7. Yudh Kand Part 2 Hanuman ji brings Garuda and then fight with Meghanath begins again with Meghnath harming Lakshman ji yet again and Hanuman is bringing Sanjeevani In interval scene - Lakshman ji kills Meghnath And then final battle between Ravan and Ram ji takes place And after 5 parts Ram-Sita unites
@santoshraysr9943 Жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@kashutosh9132 Жыл бұрын
And my Dream Cast will be - 1. Ram - Ranbir(or Abhishek Chauhan from asur) 2. Lakshman - Aditya(or Vishesh Bansal if Abhishek Chauhan is Ram) Others casting is accordance with Ranbir and Aditya Kapoor. 3. Bharat - Arjun Bijlani 4. Starughana - Gurfateh 5. Seeta - Alia(after seeing her role in RRR) 6. Hanuman - NTR as Human ji is protagonist of Sundar Kand 7. Dashrath - Gajraj Rao 8. Koushalaya - Neena Gupta 9. Kekayi - Sushmita 10.Janak - Darshan Jariwala 11. Vishwamitra - Neeraj Kabi 12. Prahshuram - Sharad Kelkar 13. Manthra - Tilotama shome 14. Marich - Raghubir Yadav 15. Jatayu - Anil Charanjeet 16. Suparnkha - Rasika Duggal 17. Ravan - Ajay Devgn 18. Jamvanth - Sourabh Shukla 19. Nal - Neel - Sidhhant Nigam & Abhishek Nigam 20. Bali & Sugriva - Rajeev Khandelwal 21. Angad - Sidhaant Chaturvedi 22. Khar - dushan - Nikitin Dheer and Arya Babbar 23. AksayKumar - Shiv Pandit 24. Meghnath - Ranveer Singh 25. Vibhisan - Pankaj Tripathi 25. Kumbhkaran - SRK VFX SRK will be cool to see🙈 26. Atikaya - 27. Narantaka & Devantaka - 28. Mandodari - Shriya Saran all sons, brother of Ravan should be casted and showcased in film as in end all his family members (male) die except vibhisan So that we can see character arc of Ravan also Also it would be nice if we cast young actors for role of Ram and his brothers and Sita. Like actors in age group of Siddharth Nigam or Vishesh Bansal(from asur). I would love to to see Vishesh as Lakshman and his older counter part in asur as Ram(as the guy has the calmness on his face). - if forces of market allows. Bcuz ram ji was just 16 when he was sent to vanvash so it make sense for younger actors
@lostgirl4932 Жыл бұрын
Dude this would have broken all the records and created a history. They had a huge opportunity on a silver platter and still didn't make use of it.
@seemonjena659 Жыл бұрын
Man it seems it would have been better if you had directed Adipurush! Your knowledge of Ramayan is explicitly evident from the fact that you have beautifully divided the epic into perfect parts! If only Om Raut had .1% of your sensibility maybe this movie would not have been the most disastrous movie ever in Indian cinema.
@gulabjamun6897 Жыл бұрын
Yes Good.
@RahulSoni-om3yl Жыл бұрын
Remember how Prabhas fans were trolling every single thing about Brahmastra and saying "wait for Adipurush. You'll see how south promotes Hinduism" and all? LOL 😂
@kaustubh6113 Жыл бұрын
Now they are telling its bollywood movie ..
@RahulSoni-om3yl Жыл бұрын
@@kaustubh6113 sab aise he hain
@vaibhavprakash4487 Жыл бұрын
I am deeply shocked to learn that a person like Manoj Muntashir wrote such cringy dialogues of the movie. Man, this man looks so learned and present himself with utmost grace. It is really hard to believe that he carries this level of thought process and yes after facing the backlash, he is just giving justification for the shit he has done.
@venkatramannayak6062 Жыл бұрын
No no he wrote so tat today's kids could relate it... and when today's kids grow up they will have the same language control etc too... and how they will justify??? Kids will say hanuman ji bhi vaise bolte the to hum kyu na bole???
@RR_theproahole Жыл бұрын
He got too swept away with his popularity and lost control over himself and wrote whatever first came to his head but he forgot that when you are appealing to sentiments of people, you're handling a double edged sword, a small mistake and you will cut yourself.
@vaibhavprakash4487 Жыл бұрын
@@RR_theproahole Irony is that he refused to acknowledge his mistake. He definitely is very well learned person but what he did is really indigestible. Overall, the movie is a complete disaster given the fact that it has been made with a budget of 600 cr.
@Its_BM Жыл бұрын
Usko sirf Urdu words use karna aata he. Ispe toh nahi karsakte isiliye bakchodi bhare words bhardiya
@saumyapathak5865 Жыл бұрын
@@venkatramannayak6062exactly. If this is his argument the the tewm should have used proper shudh hindi dialogues even more to enculvute good language skill among the childern. Such tapori lingua is definitely not something we would want our children to use.
@teekshanheeragcet-- Жыл бұрын
rajamouli sir once said " i fear to make mahabharata (he literally and definitely meant all cultural preciouss including The epic❤️ ) i feel if anything went wrong before the audience even i wont be able to forgive myself" edit- that braketed sentence
@aashikasharma1616 Жыл бұрын
But om raut is shameless
@whentheimposterissus8376 Жыл бұрын
Trust me bro. Only he could have done justice to our Ramayana🙏 and Mahabharatam🙏.
@whentheimposterissus8376 Жыл бұрын
I know Alluri SitaRam Raju used to wear Shree Ram's🙏 Vanvasi Look while fighting with colonisers . But When Ram Charan came on the screen as Vanvasi Shree Ram🙏 , I literally cried like a baby. He looked beautiful, majestic, godly and Royal.
@rinagajjar5016 Жыл бұрын
@@aashikasharma1616yeh to rakshso bhi jyada Gaye guzare hai
@cricmasti8416 Жыл бұрын
@@aashikasharma1616 yes he is shameless along with manoj muntashir .as they are justifying this nonsense they made.
@tron3454 Жыл бұрын
I can bet that old animated Ramayan will get more audience in theatres than current Adipurush
@dontmesswithme2120 Жыл бұрын
Waste prabhas...his time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@shrutik9673 Жыл бұрын
Yoo chalega
@dontmesswithme2120 Жыл бұрын
@@shrutik9673 pove mullam pandi lanja🤣🤣🤣prabhas muslodi blind fan🤣🤣🤣🤣
@barsha362 Жыл бұрын
We should start a petition for re-release of the old animated Ramayana in India. That movie deserves appreciation which it didn't get in its time
@mcmohitchauhan21 Жыл бұрын
The animated Ramayana was well made. A delight to watch.
@sujankumar4301 Жыл бұрын
So glad that this movie is getting the deserved criticism from more than 95% of the reviewers instead of a diplomatic approach. Time to call spade a spade especially when the movie makers set a wrong pretense during the promotion.
@vriddhika Жыл бұрын
They made such a joke out of such an iconic epic of our history. It makes my heart break how bollywood always tries to hurt the sentiments of our culture. This movie can never be justified no matter what the creators say.
@snehajog5 Жыл бұрын
It’s ridiculous how they are now shamelessly justifying the dialogues and looks of the characters. They even said that it is just ‘heavily inspired’ from Ramayana but not the actual Ramayana..after promoting so much as a Ramayana story..so much so that they ended up reserving a seat for Lord Hanuman..how disgusting is that!
@TriedRefusedProductions Жыл бұрын
The back tracking and the blatant contradiction just in the matter of a few weeks is shocking
@rajthakkar9500 Жыл бұрын
Audience is even more disgusting i mean they only left a seat for Lord Hanuman but audience is leaving whole theatre empty as a tribute!!!😑😅
@ananditachauhan5285 Жыл бұрын
@@TriedRefusedProductions I dont think so. If u see carefully the movie is called adipurush and not ramayan. Ram was called raghav, lakshman as setu, sita as janki, raavan as lankesh and hanuman as bajrang. So ofcourse at the script stage itself, makers had that intent and its not a 180 degree turn that u r saying.The intent was to create an adaptation based on Ramayan..otherwise instead of naming it as adipurush they would have named the film directly as Ramayan. Also u need to stop comparing films!!!!!! This movie starts from sita apharan. So why are u talking about bharath, dashrath, ayodhya when the starting point of the film is different ? U seem to be giving avery redundant explanation when u r accusing them of not showing the backstory. How much can u club in a 3 hr movie? Didnt u see how Ram refused to kill the demon who came as vibheeshan, how he chose to be on Sugriv's side even though Lakshman said that Bali is stronger, how he held cremation of jatayu giving him a respectful goodbye, how he told vibheeshan that he need not be on Ram's side and can choose to be neutral, when he said for him maryada is far more imoortant and thats why he wont take Ayodha's military help. So many things are shown in the film which talk about ram's character..and u didnt get Ram? The makers clearly put up a disclaimer that they changed the screenplay a bit and isnt 100% factual..so why are we stuck on costumes,hairstyles etc? U r literally doing scene by scene comparison of anime ramayan and adipurush. Why are u butchering the film like that. Yes i know 4 to 5 dialogues were very bad but u cant potray as if nothing more to the film's credit. The Jai Shree Ram BGM was epic. U people are clinging to 4 to 5 dialogues and are forgetting every other dialogue like the speech ram gave to vanar sena U said ram's dichotomy about bloodshed wasnt explored? Didnt u hear the promise prabhas made to vibheeshan in the movie that he will not damage Lanka as its Raavan's fault. I mean u can let go off the physics defying horrible train sequence on pathaan, u can let go off how far pathaan is afar from reality where they show an ex RAW agent bad and an ISI agent girl good but u cant digest the creative liberties filmmakers took with the costume kf Raavan and literally just 4 to 5 dialogues on finger count which were cringe? I didnt see the same microscopic criticism for pathaan from u
@sharathwho4927 Жыл бұрын
@@ananditachauhan5285 amusing to see someone defend all of it.. 😂
@ananditachauhan5285 Жыл бұрын
@@sharathwho4927 but what wrong did i say? Werent those scenes that i said a part of the movie. I fail to understand how people who are catching 4 to 5 dialogues that dont come for more than one minute in the film are conveniently ignoring all the scenes that i mentioned. I found Jammy to be very biased on this video. The leniency shown for films like pathaan seems to be missing here
@shradhapatnaik3197 Жыл бұрын
Now that Japanese anime films like Suzume are released in theaters and received massive indian audience I wish if there was a way they could re-release animated Ramayana for everyone to see on the big screenns or on the OTT platforms
@taigafgo Жыл бұрын
I wish Animax would be back in India. Greedy Sony took away my fav channel for useless kids channel
@adnankhan-hn8yy Жыл бұрын
You can expect only a cheap make of that …..This is Bollywood there is no logic
@nickarvas9566 Жыл бұрын
4k remastered version of the movie is being released on Netflix soon
@youdontknowme2913 Жыл бұрын
They will try to boycott it instead lol
@spellcheck5393 Жыл бұрын
Suzume❤ I want them to show hayao Miyazaki also esp howls moving castle😍
@varadbhandare4441 Жыл бұрын
I've always believed that to properly adapt the Ramayana to the big screen, the effort should be akin to the Production of "The Lord of The Rings" by Peter Jackson. Such an epic cannot be taken lightly.
@nithilakaruppusamy5609 Жыл бұрын
I watched siya ke ram aired on star plus and Ashish Sharma as Ram and Madrakshi Mundle as Sita still remain one of the best potrayals.. Ashish Sharma's calm and kind demeanor as Ram and Madrakshi as the strong and Resleint sita still feels fresh to me and hits close to home
@tvaddict6491 Жыл бұрын
TBH Ashish Sharma is absolutely the right casting for Lord Ram on tv within the current lot of actors present. He has the face and he has the genteel demeanour down pat!
@Sleepyken900 Жыл бұрын
This looks like Raavan is reborn as Om Raut and taking his due vengeance on ramayan en mass. As a Srilankan, I really can't complain though 😂
@_kartik_chauhan Жыл бұрын
Sri Lankan?😮
@Sleepyken900 Жыл бұрын
@@_kartik_chauhan I'm
@_kartik_chauhan Жыл бұрын
@@Sleepyken900 Sinhala ?
@user-vm5jb8db2q Жыл бұрын
Srilankan 🤢🤮
@DarkMasterEdits-Mashups Жыл бұрын
Bro means kuch bhi You are talking non sense How lankesh raavan will show his golden lanka as coal lanka And having look of chapri Even if ravan was alive after watching this movie he will commit suicide
@deepadido Жыл бұрын
I was in the theatre yesterday, and a family with children was sitting beside me. The parents were truly disappointed, as they came thinking their children will learn about the epic.
@May0200 Жыл бұрын
Ranbir kapoor must have bought tickets of this movie so that people see this movie and appreciate brahmastra.
@FireCat14 Жыл бұрын
This is what I found when I searched for the animated movie - In 1983, while working on "The Ramayana Relics" a documentary film about excavations by Dr. B. B. Lal near Allahabad in Uttar Pradesh (India) Yugo Sako came to know about the story of Ramayana. He liked the story of the Ramayana so much that he researched deeper into the topic and went on to read 10 versions of the Ramayana in Japanese. After reading the Ramayana he wanted to adapt it into animation as he didn't think a live-action movie could capture the true essence of Ramayana, "Because Ram is God, I felt it was best to depict him in animation, rather than by an actor." TEM Co., Ltd. financed the production and a new production studio Nippon Ramayana Film Co., Ltd. was set up and the principal animation of the film began in 1990 with 450 artists on board. Indian animators guided their Japanese teammates with Indian customs and traditions depicted in the film like how dhotis are worn and how the children receive blessings from their elders. . He researched so much before making the movie and he was an outsider with little to no knowledge about Ramayan. Yet a guy from India who grew up with the story botched it. I'm glad I did not watch this!
@debanjanaroy7911 Жыл бұрын
where can i watch this animated ramayan ?
@FireCat14 Жыл бұрын
@@debanjanaroy7911 it's on KZfaq
@dontmesswithme2120 Жыл бұрын
Waste prabhas...his time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@__rmk__9360 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing this! I am intrigued to watch Yugo Sako's animated version again to refresh my memories.
@FireCat14 Жыл бұрын
@@studyhard9870 I decided to not watch the movie the moment I saw the teaser not because of someone's review!
@PringleandCheese Жыл бұрын
You spoke my mind. Ramayana is not only limited to the characteristics and greatness of Shri Ram, but also the others. His brothers' (not only Lakshman, but also Bharat and Shatrughn) loyalty towards him is an excellent example to teach the new and future generations about family bonds and brotherly love, especially in an age where we see many siblings at each others throats just for property and wealth. Mata Sita, despite being someone who didn't participate in physical fights, was strong and resilient enough to protect her honor. Not once did she lose hope or give in to Ravan's threats, even when he threatened to kill her. Hanuman is the epitome of unconditional, innocent, and limitless devotion. Infact, there is a lot to learn from Ravan also. A wise, intellectual man he was, not just a psycho villian. Ravan is the representation of how lust, arrogance, overconfidence can destroy even the wisest of all minds. Shri Ram teaches us about selflessness, respect towards our elders, humility, how to remain calm even in the face of adversity, how to be fierce but level-headed at all times. Adipurush seems to be only about villian kidnaps the heorine, hero saves her. The essence of Ramayan and its characters is missed.
@susmitakerketta8937 Жыл бұрын
Truly they depicted ravan as just a villain he was one of the wisest 🤦♀️it has become a hero heroin n villan
@lifegamerpro4033 Жыл бұрын
Ramayan Moral...if one needs power simple create a vanar sena....
@dontmesswithme2120 Жыл бұрын
Prabhas career drowning lol🤣🤣🤣His time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@AdamLevine-hs4wl Жыл бұрын
#boycott om raut.
@satanswifey_ Жыл бұрын
Truly. And Ravan was a gyaani and devotee of Lord Shiva, wise and strategic. Here he is just thoughtlessly evil, where his original intentions for avenging his sister Surpnakha's honor is lost. Lord Ram wasn't aware of the way of how to defeat him and on a losing battle, where Vibhishan told him how to defeat Ravan, which is just completely tossed out of the movie.
@moonflower_1408 Жыл бұрын
The animated Ramayan is my most favorite depiction of the stories and characters of Ramayana so far. I'm disappointed how some people with lack of creativity and originality keep trying to ruin beautiful things 🥲
@smk1000 Жыл бұрын
The only reviewer who is not saying taunting other religions saying - if something similar was done in other religions they would have bombed you, beheaded you etc. Thanks for being true to your job❤
@debiprasaddas1581 Жыл бұрын
After the release of "Thugs of Hindustan" critics said what will get more disappointing than this movie where the cast includes Aamir Khan and Amitabh Bachchan and still has a underwhelming storytelling, and then Adipurush arrives with ticking all the boxes to surpass TOH with adding more boxes of bizzareness, atleast TOH had well choreographed action set pieces and some scenes stood out positively.
@bhargavipba Жыл бұрын
Also TOH was completely fictionalized. Adipurush's entire PR machinary was dedicated to making it an adaptation of Ramayan and used religion to promote the film. It's disgusting.
@kashutosh9132 Жыл бұрын
Plus Aamir issued a apology in front of public in press conference when he was informed people are disliking this. On the opposite,Manoj muntasir is blaming audience.
@dontmesswithme2120 Жыл бұрын
Waste prabhas...his time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@chetanuniyal3428 Жыл бұрын
True, I might be In the minority but i really liked parts of that movie. Every character had an arc and the mass moments worked for me on big screen.
@daphne3631 Жыл бұрын
True. I developed a headache while watching Thugs of Hindostan. I decided that nothing could be worse than this. But then came Saaho and now this
@Neil6393 Жыл бұрын
Kumbhkarna's son fight against Sugreev, neel, hanuman and the vanar sena were one of my favorite moments in the Legend of the prince rama movie. I can't believe they skipped it totally.
@youdontknowme2913 Жыл бұрын
Neel was total wack in that movie, they showed how much of a skillful fighter he is at times same how young and inexperienced he was. I totally loved his portrayal in the Yugo Sako movie.
@cricmasti8416 Жыл бұрын
After Ramanand Sagar's Ramayan , the Legend of the prince rama is the best version of Ramayan. let's forget the movie adipurush even exists.
@engineeredangle Жыл бұрын
Bro it's good they skipped that part
@TriedRefusedProductions Жыл бұрын
IKR and it built up to the ultimate big fights against Indrajith and Kumbhkaran so well!
@gkscharlie6826 Жыл бұрын
They didn't even provide importance to nal and neel. They were literally the engineers of the ram setu. And they were just like some random monkeys here
@MrDecom002 Жыл бұрын
I think we deserve Adipurush because we Banned a masterpiece like Legend of Prince Rama at indian theatres.
@nitinpai2000 Жыл бұрын
Ramayana story starts way early when Dasharath kills Shravana which is a preface for the situation to build up. Or could have gone back as long as Ravana conqurered all the three realms. Or could have gone back when Jaya and Vijaya were cursed in Vaikunta. After Jatayu's death, Rama kills Kabandha (a cursed Gandharva). Gandharva on attaining his original form, thanks and guides Rama towards Shabari's ashram. And Shabari's devotion towards Ram is a gem in Ramayana. Shabari then guiding Rama towards Kishkinda. Hanuman meeting Ram in a Brahmin's costume is a beautiful sequence on its own. In reality Ravana had asked boon that he should not be killed by any Gods, thus Rama is portrayed as normal man in the Ramayana. He lived as a normal man, took help of Vanara sena to glorify his devotees. Several questions arise when Bali is killed by Rama hiding behind tree. Even Bali raises all these questions. And I must say Ramanand Sagar's Ramayan beautifully uphold the Ram's character while answering these questions. One will understand the values followed by the living beings of those times. I would say they could have easily made 4 to 5 parts of the series with such a budget. Truth is Ram's character is so complex that actor needs to get himself immersed into the mindset of Ram which I believe only Ram can do. Even Lakshman's character is of devotion towards Ram and Sita. When Ram asks if these bangles are of Sita, Lakshman can not recognize.. but he does recognize the ring of her feet. Baharath's love for Ram is nothing like it. Bharath was in a distant land when Ram was sent to forest. He comes running to get his brother back. Its like sould leaving the body for him. He runs his kingdom by not sitting on the King's throne as he thinks it belongs to Ram. Even when Ram comes back from Vanwas, he doesn't want to go to Ayodhya and take the kingdom back from Bharath. He tells Hanuman to go and tell Bharath about His arrival. If Hanuman notices any sign of Bharath wanting to keep the kingdom he should reveal it to Ram, so that Ram will not take over the kingdom. But on hearing Ram's arrival, Bharath runs to wherever Ram is with teary eye. This classic could only be produced (even not in detail) once by Sri. Ramananda Sagarji. And with that people touch Sri Arun Govil's feet for doing justice to that character.
@sayantosikder896 Жыл бұрын
After watching Adipurush , Now i really think that Shakuntala did a really great job with it's budget. Atleast it looks like a TV serial project and not a disasterous cartoon
@jaiminsharma Жыл бұрын
What Gambhir said about Indian cricket audience also applies to movie audience... We are always being influenced by actors aka individuals and not the team.... I hope people start taking directors as important as we look at stars... It is directors who is responsible for final vision... Adipurush is disgraceful...
@jaiminsharma Жыл бұрын
@kochikame363 exactly
@dontmesswithme2120 Жыл бұрын
Waste prabhas...his time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@agasthya9128 Жыл бұрын
Yet Prabhas fans will defend this movie with their life. Met one yesterday and his justification why he found the movie good was just hilariously shocking. They are just blind by Prabhas. They don’t care about the movie quality at all.
@RealShaktimaan Жыл бұрын
In South, movie never opens dud like they do in Bollywood. Telugu states had great box office bc of their god and Tamil didn't because movie didn't have their god in the movie.
@Tunascoop Жыл бұрын
Prabhas is average at best
@krishnapriyaar65652 ай бұрын
One thing noticed in Adipurush is that in the original version Sita was in Ashok Vatika in Lanka and the Ashok tree still symbolizes grief and longing in hindu culture. But in the film instead of Ashok vatika it is full of cherry blossoms 🌸 with baby pink flowers all around as if Sita is in Japan. How come these makers are so dump about the facts
@sharwankori218 Жыл бұрын
Small correction - In Ramayan (atleast some equally prominent versions), Lord Ram pray to sea god, but when he didn't respond he threaten him. So that is the whole part, but it's true even there Ram was trying to solve things in peaceful manner, and teached us that violence should be our last resolve.
@vikassayan Жыл бұрын
The Legend of Prince Rama by the Japanese animator Yugo Sako was played first time on Sunday on Cartoon Network in India. I still remember it was advertised heavily.
@santanu-fr Жыл бұрын
Oh I watched it several times as a kid & wondered why it was far more charming than other cartoons. My excitement was no less than DBZ
@poojasarkar7552 Жыл бұрын
It was the first movie I watched when my family got our first colour tv................
@venkatramannayak6062 Жыл бұрын
Frankly tats how I was introduced to ramayan....
@the_alley_cat_ Жыл бұрын
Aahh... Those were the best days.
@subhajitbasu4187 Жыл бұрын
I remember it aired for the first time on Doordarshan. Later the rights were bought by Cartoon Network.
@shivanithakur5289 Жыл бұрын
They had a chance to create a ramverse 1. The legend of Hanuman 2. Ravaan the demon king 3. Adipurush( ends on vanvaas) 4. Ramayan chapter 1 ( ends on ram setu ) 5. Ramayan chapter 2 ( the final battle )
@fatimahfilms. Жыл бұрын
I was literally thinking the same thing.
@muskanbhat8192 Жыл бұрын
These filmmakers think that they can befool us by portraying anything regarding Hindu scriptures as they believe this new generation anyway won't be knowing the real one.. this has become their overconfidence and their audacity to make a film like this and argue on television.. Until unless we know our roots and history.. we can prevent these moves from being carried forwards to our next generation.. It solely depends on our reaction to these kind of attempts..😐
@mohanapenumarti9703 Жыл бұрын
Why the sequence of Vali and Sugreev were so beautiful is that they're very similar in their claims and it's hard to see who deserved the throne. Vali was the first king, the stronger one, who trusted his brother, and felt so betrayed when he thought that his brother abandoned him to die to have the throne and his wife. However, Ram decided to kill him, against his own rules of not killing from behind, for the sake of what (he believes) is right. It shows how thin is the line between what is good and what is bad, and also shows how wise ram was. What was pictured on screen in adipurush, a small child can understand why Sugreev was better than Vali, making Ram's judgement not grand enough to paint his character.
@krishnanunnimadathil8142 Жыл бұрын
Bali and Sugreev is their own movie.
@prasannav Жыл бұрын
Tumbbad budget is just 0.7% of Adipurush's budget. That's all I want to say about the film. As you were explaining about the movie, I am glad that you have showed images of our childhood "Ramayan : The legend of prince rama" movie. When I say this everyone in the comment section might agree with me on this. This is what everyone wants. instead of spending 700 crores, they should have spent at least 1% of that money and bought the theatrical rights and re-released the 4k version of "Ramayan : The legend of prince rama" movie in theatres. Everyone in our country would have enjoyed and appreciated them if they did that. Last but not least that movie made by both Japanese and Indian filmmakers. That is the Ramayan we want.
@girishmahtle8673 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for mentioning TUMMBAD
@Azx12345 Жыл бұрын
They actually shot at live locations and how beautiful those shots are can't even compare them to this thing adipurush
@samikshasuvarna1174 Жыл бұрын
Oh yes this is such a right point to make!!! The concept art of this film only seems to be never made!! Tumbaad moments have a strong conception which is heavy enough even after bad cgi of Hastar!!
@akshanshbadole6730 Жыл бұрын
Tumbbad makers and actors had a passion to make a masterpiece movie. While making adipurush makers and actors didn't show any passion to make movie. They just want to earn money and mislead the audience.
@Sam-Ang023 Жыл бұрын
I watched Adipurush yesterday evening... and my respect for Mani Ratnam increased. Mani Ratnam's adaptation Raavan ( his worst ) though flawed was still way better in terms of visuals, storytelling, music & treatment compared to Adipurush🙏🏻 If the makers wanted a spin on Ramayana.. they could've made a movie on Chadrabati Ramayana.
@lifegamerpro4033 Жыл бұрын
One hate love no matters only money 🤑🤑🤑🤑 🤑 Matters EOD
@kashutosh9132 Жыл бұрын
Where ravaan was shown good and ram in bad light? Thats kind of ramayan you like?
@Sam-Ang023 Жыл бұрын
@@kashutosh9132 I think you didn't read my comment properly.
@daphne3631 Жыл бұрын
I liked Raavan a lot. Watched it in theatre. I think Mani Ratnam did a good job. Loved Abhishek as Beera in it. I am glad someone else mentioned it.
@jaimiljoshi111 Жыл бұрын
so well explained - "Unnecessary Need to Move Forward" these words says a lot
@shreyakhaire883 Жыл бұрын
Om raut watched baahubali and wanted to become ss rajmouli of bollywood but he didn’t know how tough the job was
@msriram9884 Жыл бұрын
The sad part is that Indian people know how to stage the Ramayana, they’ve been doing it for centuries. We have entire texts like the Natya Shastra and the Abhinaya Darpana that teach how to stage these things. There are four types of Abhinaya ( this is what leads the audience to the experience or the Rasa). If you have presented the Ramayan and the audience is upset at the end, you completely botched the Rasa. Angika Abhinaya - use of body, facial expressions. Rama has to appear composed. Ravana should not appear like some cartoonish villain. Every character in the story has a particular type of physical embodiment Vachika Abhinaya - this is dialogues in music. again dialogues were a mess in this film. Aharya Abhinaya - this is costuming and state setting. This is actually the most important thing in presenting a story from the itihasa. The audience has to be very easily able to tell the character from their costuming. they cannot be wondering why Ravan has some sort of teenage boy haircut. Satvika Abhinaya. Very difficult to explain but the subtle elements of expression. Watch Maduri Dikshit dance she uses them. Probably any dance teacher or even some fifth standard teacher or even a bunch of random aunties could’ve done a better job putting together a Ramayana.
@daphne3631 Жыл бұрын
Very well written
@limelight2228 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this information 🙏
@shriharis2540 Жыл бұрын
One of the major setbacks I felt with the film was how emotionally empty each character was portrayed to be. Given that it's an epic that is so close to our hearts, there was no sense of connection with any character. Lord Ram is the embodiment of all things good, sincere devotion, a calm demeanor and a sense of peace that comes with him, and starting the introduction of Lord Ram with an illogical fight sequence just took away what Lord Ram stands for.
@user-rm5rz2zh8k Жыл бұрын
So fcking true There's no emotional connection
@dontmesswithme2120 Жыл бұрын
Waste prabhas...his time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@joydipbera8665 Жыл бұрын
Prabhas just had only one fkin facial expression in the entire movie
@kritiaggarwal88 Жыл бұрын
Can a petition be made to release Ramayana: The Legend of Prince Rama on big screen?
@vishakha1985 Жыл бұрын
Always love the reviews and deep discussions. Just one suggestion please work on the pronouncing names please. For eg- It's taa-dah-ka
@nihal114 Жыл бұрын
I am so surprised that it's now that people are realizing Prabhas was a wrong casting for Ram ji. I hated him from the very first time i saw him in the role. I was even surprised that people weren't trolling or protesting against it. Instead, everyone was Preaching Prabhas, that wow, India's biggest star, he is looking amazing, he will get the movie the success it deserves. Literally log chaat rahe the. I consider him the most selfish actor. He 100% knew he was looking terrible in the role. Infact, he was more suited fir the role of Ravan than Saif. But still he took the role because he was hungry for the praise and credit. To be called the actor who does the biggest indian movies. He was also greedy like Om the director. Their only aim was to take advantage of people's emotions and make the biggest ever profit over it. They were overly confident that they can easily fool the audience and make money. Ramayan aisi movie hai jo main apna ghar bechkar bhi sahi banau lekin itni gandi banakar world level pr na release karu puri countryaur heritage ko embarrass karne ke liye. Director ko to itni gaaliya sunane ka mann kr raha hai ki hadd nahi. Abhi bhi pakka vo galti nahi manega bas defend karega khudku creative liberty ka excuse dekar.
@dhyeypandya581 Жыл бұрын
Exactly, Prabhas mujhe bhi shuru se bakwas lag raha tha Shree Ram ke liye, aur uss bande ne ek baar bhi apni body pe bhi kaam nahi kiya, acting to jaane hi do...pataa nahi kyon logo ne usse sar chadaa rakhaa hai, mujhe to baahubali ke baad ek bhi movie me Prabhas ka kaam achha nahi lagaa
@kavya26s Жыл бұрын
Hey 😅 I don't know if you have been following any video regarding adhipurush or not but from the start itself prabhas was heavily criticized and everyone including his die hard fans have accepted that prabhas is a wrong choice to play as Lord Ram. I don't know which universe you were living in😂😂
@dhyeypandya581 Жыл бұрын
@@kavya26s before the release of posters and teaser, i rarely saw someone who was worried with Prabhas playing as Shree Ram. Otherwise everyone was rejoicing about the casting of Prabhas.
@kavya26s Жыл бұрын
@@dhyeypandya581 well that's not true. See the comments posted under teaser reviews of this very channel. I m sure u would find many comments against casting prabhas. I like prabhas and I myself agree he was a bad choice for adipurush.
@brucewayne6590 Жыл бұрын
Prabhas post bahubali is the worst actor out there 🤣🤣
@anandhubabu4427 Жыл бұрын
Just imagine a foreigner who is not aware about Ramayana get introduced to it by watching Adipurush😑... What will they think of our Epic😢
@RR_theproahole Жыл бұрын
They won't be going to theatres after seeing the reviews and I am happy about that
@daphne3631 Жыл бұрын
The thought is apalling. It makes me want to stop its international screening
@mynamedure7405 Жыл бұрын
Growing up the animated version of ramayan was my favorite movie... just watching its clips now in your video made me recall why I loved it so much... it was perfect❤
@snowflakes7344 Жыл бұрын
The worst part of the movie was, I didnt feel anything. There was no pont where i felt happy, sad, excited or angry. I just sat there, for 3 hours, waiting to feel something.
@rajanshendre7177 Жыл бұрын
Screw this. Now, the only thing we need to do is somehow get the new remastered version of the 1992 Ramayana released worldwide.
@bhavapritaapara9274 Жыл бұрын
Yes
@deepalimahajan6313 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely!!!!
@ashwinidesai4051 Жыл бұрын
Rightly said.
@kaustubhgoswami5150 Жыл бұрын
The difference between a director like Ayan Mukherjee and an Om Raut is clearly evident. While one had total conviction on his story that he worked hard to make sure it looked good on the big screen and spent years getting the perfect Visual Effects possible. He even took the public's criticism about the dialogues and atleast made some efforts to do some editing changes in the OTT version so that the scenes feel less cringy. While that may or may not have been totally successful it tells you a lot about a person who really had made a story with a vision, sincerity and conviction and really wanted the people to be invested in it. While the total opposite can be said of Om Raut and his team as there seems to ne no sincerity in the efforts to make this movie and it is clearly evident that they wanted to just ride on the Epic's popularity and people's emotions towards the text to just mint money. The way they have been giving interviews and press conferences and performing idiotic marketing gimmick are testament to the level of arrogance these people have. Shame of T-series and the entire team for making this such a disaster from the get go with zero effort. Adipurush is indeed the biggest scam of 2023
@Sun.Shine- Жыл бұрын
Oh, was the dialogues revised in OTT version?
@ashwinikumar261 Жыл бұрын
@@Sun.Shine- yes
@dontmesswithme2120 Жыл бұрын
Prabhas career drowning lol🤣🤣🤣His time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Akash-cg3iy Жыл бұрын
You can't compare one tatti with another much. Both are 💩
@barsha362 Жыл бұрын
It is criminal to play with sentiments of people in the name of God
@AkashYadavOriginal Жыл бұрын
At 11:05 in Ramayan, Ram prays to Sea god for path continuously for 3 days. When when he doesn't answer, he threatens to destroy the sea. After which a fearful Sea God appears and asks for forgiveness. For which Ram forgave him, but he said I have already put my arrow in my bow and it cannot be put back, so tell me where should I use this arrow. He directs him to an alternative mountain where demons are running havoc to which Ram complies. It was changed in animated Ramayan, doesn't mean it never happened. You also need to read the texts or watch the Ramayan by Ramanand Sagar. It seems your point of reference to Ramayan is only the Animated film.
@Daneshwar2022 Жыл бұрын
When 1992 Animated Ramayan came, everyone criticized n condemned the movie, now it's Classic, let see what people will say about Adipurush in 2053.
@nerds3k Жыл бұрын
Bobby Deol cameo in the start was such a sweet surprise. Following Jammy for 5 years now and can't believe he has grown so much that celebrities just appear randomly from their bedroom in his videos🤌🔥
@TriedRefusedProductions Жыл бұрын
Hahahahahah 😂
@mr.hiccup Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@sanchitkumar5784 Жыл бұрын
😂😂
@anishkhadgi6822 Жыл бұрын
@@TriedRefusedProductions next time Naiyo Naiyo
@ayushchoubey7319 Жыл бұрын
Lmfao
@seemonjena659 Жыл бұрын
If I may say so, I believe the actors too are to be blamed for this disaster. I understand the fact that an actor is mostly dependent on the director's vision for the movie, but come on someone in the cast should have questioned the sanity of the makers halfway across the shooting process. The story of Shree Ram teaches us that even in the most direst of circumstances human beings can make the choice to be compassionate, calm and courageous. Adipurush just destroyed the essence of the epic.
@amandadarkwood535 Жыл бұрын
I mean didn’t they read the script before signing the movie??
@seemonjena659 Жыл бұрын
@@amandadarkwood535 Yeah that too! Maybe they were hopeful that the direction would be better than the script considering the fact that Omm Raut was considered to be the real director of Tanhaji which after the release of Adipurush is in question big time! Or it can be said that even the actors are highly materialistic like the makers and wanted nothing but to mint money by riding on the currently prevalent Hindutva climate!
@amandadarkwood535 Жыл бұрын
@@seemonjena659 don’t know about the others but Kriti Sanon is definitely materialistic which is quite clear from her film choices despite her success with Mimi. She doesn’t seem to be passionate about acting itself but rather everything else that comes with being a Bollywood star. She seems like the kind of person who just wants to make as much money as possible without any real love for cinema.
@dontmesswithme2120 Жыл бұрын
Waste prabhas...his time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Finnola Жыл бұрын
That's the joke of the century. Actors come into this project just to collect big pay checks. "Pan India" collaborations has become a joke with these spectacle based movies. It only works few times and the majority of time movies are not focused on stories and getting something new out of the actors. In prabhas case there's no story just try to replicate what he did years ago and attract other actors with promises of big pay day.
@alvinvazha1144 Жыл бұрын
Rajamouli scammed the whole nation by showing Prabhas can act lol. He churned the best out of Prabhas with the Bahubali series. Since then Prabhas has never been even near its shadow in his later outings.
@thunderhaze8500 Жыл бұрын
Being a Nepali Hindu .....I am appalled at the fact that Sita is called Bharat (India) ki beti .... This movie has got almost all facts wrong .... Sita ( Janaki ) is the Daughter of King Janak of Mithila(Janakpur Dham)which is in Nepal🇳🇵 Jay SiyaRam ....🙏🙏
@Shhreyaaaaaaa_ Жыл бұрын
Yess exactly, it's better to watch old ramayana . Makes me so sad 😞
@PrabhanjanMangalgi Жыл бұрын
The sad thing is that in yesterday's republic tv interview (probably) both the writer and director said "we have not created ramayan but a story heavily inspired by it" which was expected and predicted already when they knew thry will be questioned. This clearly shows the intentions of the makers. This event adds another excuse to the "boycott bollywood" narrative and also a reference to mock our ancient scriptures unnecessarily.
@a-fact-ed Жыл бұрын
Then why add the song "Jai Shri Ram" and a seat vacant for Hanumanji
@ranbirraj4385 Жыл бұрын
Bro Bollywood has nothing to do with this. No johar,No big khan, No Kapoor, No Bhatt. Writer and Director of this movie already said that few years ago they don't belong to Bollywood . Except Tseries who is co producer with Prabhas.
@PrabhanjanMangalgi Жыл бұрын
@@a-fact-ed they want to play it all the way. Agar hit hota to ramayan keh dete, abhi joote pad rahe hai toh bolte Hain ki inspired hai. Shamelessness has a face and it's the makers of this movie.
@PrabhanjanMangalgi Жыл бұрын
@@ranbirraj4385 this is what I wrote exactly in the main message bro,
@a-fact-ed Жыл бұрын
@@PrabhanjanMangalgi the duality of the Adipurush team
@Anonymous-bf5fk Жыл бұрын
While Brahmastra too had poor dialogues, I feel that at least there was a vision, but execution failed. With Adipurush instead, there was no vision at all.
@AtulKumar-le3mu Жыл бұрын
Look no body had any expectations from Brahmastra but with Adipurush it's basically one of the most epic stories in the world stillOm raut failed miserably
@Sun.Shine- Жыл бұрын
Brahmastra had good intentions are a story vision for it. And it is a director's film not an adaptation.
@toshibatewari5926 Жыл бұрын
Rameswaram temple was established by Lord Ram to appease Varun Dev and the locals of the place to build abridge. The temple still exists. Imagine washing that fact away and showing Lord Ram as an angry man. The hawan, the prayers all completely lost- how shameful 😒
@adityabhardwaj9884 Жыл бұрын
Bro! Love your content! The less I say something about this movie, the better. Though just a heads up, it's 'Tadaka' as in ताड़का , not really TadAka. Big fan!
@ratneshshirodkar4907 Жыл бұрын
So we are just going to ignore the fact that the makers of Adipurush completely skipped the character of Akshaykumar (Ravan's Son) who in brawl was killed by Hanuman ji. Cool!!
@akhileshkelkar8713 Жыл бұрын
The animated Ramayana showed more of Ramayana in 2.5 hours than what Adipurush did in 3… Just goes to show how a well researched project turns out as an end product.
@venkatramannayak6062 Жыл бұрын
There are different versions of ramayan in each region... with some extra details nd some additional stories tat gives good morales only... nd m pretty sure the director and writer have not even read one of them.. just heard ramayan in brief nd then made movie out if it so tat today's ppl can relate to it
@kkkkjjjj4517 Жыл бұрын
greatest achievement of Adi Purush - got everyone talking about The Legend of Prince Ram
@prathikdevaruppala Жыл бұрын
As a Telugu person, Saaho was a mistake on tollywood. It was under the direction of a Telugu director. Adipurush despite starting Prabhas, is a mistake on Bollywood because it was predominantly under the direction of a Hindi director and a Hindi production. Don’t hate please
@visordownn Жыл бұрын
The lead actor also has creative control over the project, he knew a sh!show is being made, still he complied.
@prathikdevaruppala Жыл бұрын
@@visordownn for Adipurush, he probably thought that it could be good, but didn’t know since he was probably in front of a green screen the entire time
@snak3eye547 Жыл бұрын
The uneducated Telugu and Prabhas fans as usual will make this a hit movie and it allready crossed 340 cr. And seeing how this is becoming a box office hit more hack directors like Om Raut Will butcher more historical movies in the future like Mahabharata..
@anvishrivastava9766 Жыл бұрын
Totally…
@AnotherNPC1234 Жыл бұрын
who cares? North Indians don't associate their identity with bollywood anyway. They watch whatever they like he irrespective of industry.
@smrutibissoyi9603 Жыл бұрын
The problem with the movie is lack of research. The makers failed to understand the nature of characters. To oversimplify the dialogues you can't just change the powerful but calm nature of characters like Hanuman or Shri Ram. Ravan ki niyat kharab thi par wo bhi maha pandit tha.
@DarkMasterEdits-Mashups Жыл бұрын
Now dialouge writter of aadipurush manoj mushthashir publish video on difference between valmiki and tulshi das ramayan
@prathapcharan Жыл бұрын
Ramayana kaa kya research kare . It's an epic known by almost all the Indians one way or another. It's just pure laziness and felt like money laundering to me.
@lifegamerpro4033 Жыл бұрын
Simply they want to connect with chapri hindus ...Manoj said chapri hindus dont understand bhata shree typo of launguage
@elle12390 Жыл бұрын
And its surprising that they didn’t do proper research despite such easy access to resources. Also most of us know the story and nuances of the characters. How can you mess it up!
@elle12390 Жыл бұрын
@@prathapcharan Money laundering seems like only reasonable explanation otherwise botching it this bad makes no sense
@ajoyr1038 Жыл бұрын
This movie showcase the current mindset of Nations HinduSs who just shout the slogan of jai shree ram without understanding the teaching of lord Rama and Ramayan.
@krishshautriya5170 Жыл бұрын
Well said.
@AcidifiedMammoth Жыл бұрын
To a certain extent yes.
@newbeeify Жыл бұрын
Crazy how a Japanese anime encapsulated Ramayan's story with limited time but not a movie made by Indians with a huge budget
@pixielix9808 Жыл бұрын
"Ramayan- The epic' (2010) also deserves the hype. I used to watched it on CD when I was younger and it was one of my favourites. The BG score is so powerful and nostalgic. It is a 3d animated movie and worth a watch. Available on KZfaq. My cue to binge watch it rn 🏃♀️ Edit- I just got to know that the voices of Ram and Sita are given by Manoj bajpayee and Juhi Chawala 🤯 and Ravana's by Ashutosh Rana!
@mohammedsufyan4011 Жыл бұрын
Saw a beautiful comment here explaining how we could do Ramayan 7 part movie ... But hear me out, why don't we do a three-part movie (which is more practical) and between each movie we do an OTT series the covers the subplots. (similar to what Marvel is doing to build the universe) The three movies would be covering the main plots of the Ramayana story and an anthology styled series could be covering the important subplots within Ramayana that fleshes of the whole story. (3 parts and two series in between).
@AcidifiedMammoth Жыл бұрын
Yes! That is typically how I like large scale mythology/fantasy done. Just as how I wish LOTR was done and Rings of Powers should've been that anthology series instead of the shitshow that Amazon churned out.
@gauravmahajan3985 Жыл бұрын
I am baffled that no one is bashing prabhas for his body language and the way he carried himself He was just sleep walking through his role just like Akshay Kumar did for samraat Everyone blamed Akshay for the failure but no one is talking about prabhas lame portrayal of Shri Ram The best I have heard is that prabhas is suitable for Anil kumble's biopic😂
@prathapcharan Жыл бұрын
You haven't been following social media then. People are trolling prabhas like anything and telling him to get his act together and concentrate on his physique
@kavya26s Жыл бұрын
Oh here I am thinking prabhas is blamed more than the director and people are trolling him like anything !!
@snak3eye547 Жыл бұрын
The uneducated Telugu and Prabhas fans as usual will make this a hit movie and it allready crossed 340 cr. And seeing how this is becoming a box office hit more hack directors like Om Raut Will butcher more historical movies in the future like Mahabharata..
@daphne3631 Жыл бұрын
True. They think that making the actors work put like Arnold Schwarzenegger would be enough
@thehawkseye3412 Жыл бұрын
That's because Majoj Muntashir became brand ambassador for this movie. Since he was the one promoting and defending he is the one getting most heat. Secondly there are so many problems with the movie that reviewers comment on acting as a foot note only. Prabhas seems to be director's actor. If the movie was otherwise good, people might have said more on his acting.
@MM-my6yh Жыл бұрын
Bhagwan Ram and Seeta doing romance in the movie whereas Lord Ram had never touched maa Seeta during their exile period.
@vanshikavyas4507 Жыл бұрын
Your each and every word is so accurate . This is why i love watching your review videos as you calmly thrash the films without any cussing or shouting. You have very accurately depicted what one felt while watching this joke which they call an adaption of the great epic Ramayan.
@chanakyamore9479 Жыл бұрын
Ramayana can be made in two parts as part one can depict Ramayana until Sita is abducted and second part focuses on Lord Rama journey to save Sita from Lanka. As it would have made justice to the text.
@IftiAlam1999 Жыл бұрын
Besides the creative choices, I think the biggest mistake that was made by the makers was to tell a story like Ramayan within a single film. No matter how long it might be, there are so many components that just cannot be fit into a single film. 2 or 3 films should've done the job.
@atharvadeshpande3090 Жыл бұрын
Duology or Trilogy would have been better. . . Like first part setting up every backstory and ending with Sita Abduction. Second Part is the assembly of VanarSena and ends with Building of Ram Setu And the Third Part, the epic finale Would have just been awesome. Shit, I want to see that now!
@Nishanth_mementomori Жыл бұрын
They can make Ramayana in one movie... Fr example the anime movie frm the 90s.. these fools who made this movie are incompetent that's it
@youdontknowme2913 Жыл бұрын
The personality of the characters also don't match with the characters either from tulsi das nor valmiki's work.
@AHMEDKHAN-ep2uh Жыл бұрын
I think SS Rajamouli is planning for Mahabharata but as a series
@debasheesh Жыл бұрын
@@atharvadeshpande3090it's a good thing this particular venture was not dragged out But yes other people who actually give the source material the respect it deserves can do justice to it with a trilogy
@shameercharaniya2168 Жыл бұрын
We all Indians have loved the old Ramayan. Be it Hindus Muslims or any other religion we have watched it together. Shri Ram is our Hero. But Om Raut has made a joke about our Hero
@raniroy5642 Жыл бұрын
It has been proven time and time again that when makers don’t connect with the source material deeply the product always falls short…. This is just an extreme case of that. Ramayana is an emotion to most Indians, something woven into our psyche, turning it into a cash grab is shameful. Expected more from Prabhas.
@prakash_tattoo_studio Жыл бұрын
Prabhas is still in Bahubali's role and Saif is in Udaybhan's role which he played in Tanhaji
@eightislate Жыл бұрын
To be honest they could've just made a remastered animated version of the movie with voices by Bollywood actors and that would've have been appreciated much and loved even more by gen'z'
@youdontknowme2913 Жыл бұрын
The animation of the ramayan movie 1992 is already remastered, it only needs a remastered voice acting
@paxonite-7bd5 Жыл бұрын
@@youdontknowme2913nobody can replace amrish puri's voice for ravaan
@dontmesswithme2120 Жыл бұрын
Waste prabhas...his time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@daphne3631 Жыл бұрын
Good idea. I would pay to watch that
@youdontknowme2913 Жыл бұрын
@@paxonite-7bd5 that's a gospel truth tho
@wajidhussain5305 Жыл бұрын
They used cheap/silly dialogue to reflect current communal tensions but the right wing Hindus they were trying to impress have ended up turning against the movie 😂
@zuesr3277 Жыл бұрын
Yugo Sako one's make me cry its that good, emotions are on point with cute animation
@anubratoroy749 Жыл бұрын
It is unbelievable that the makers are still trying to justify their incompetence and lack of effort 😠😠 this project was destined to fail!! I believe people should put this movie behind themselves and never talk about it again. I am still hopeful that Nitesh Tiwari's adaptation of the text will to justice to this epic story 🤞♥️🤞
@nightmayor6114 Жыл бұрын
This could've been easily a trilogy but they had to make only one. My only hopes lies on SS Rajamouli making a multi part Mahabharata like basing a movie on 1 or 2 chapters from the epic. it will be a dream come true to if we get a Mahabharata Pentalogy or more than 5 movies diving deep into mythos and characters
@BollyWoodTribute Жыл бұрын
They should put back the animated version in cinema, it would do a lot better today.
@aniketpandey2524 Жыл бұрын
Ravana was arrogant but in no way was he a chapri and he was a highly educated and dignified king.
@cinephile4699 Жыл бұрын
Jatayu is actually a vulture while in adhipurush it is shown as a mad eagle with bipolar syndrome 😂. Raavana looks like a cyberpunk 😂 Those who want to really feel the intensity of the epic. Please do watch yugo sakos anime of Ramayana. Defintely the best one out there. 💯💯
@youdontknowme2913 Жыл бұрын
I really don't understand why people keep trying to portray him as an eagle. Is it really so hard show our loving flying companion show correctly.
@adityamohan4973 Жыл бұрын
I actually came to know about Ramayana through the serial " JAI HANUMAN " .It used to air on DD 1 It was a great serial.
@zaidpatel8695 Жыл бұрын
India and indians are united in hating Adipurush and rightfully so.
@picnic1123 Жыл бұрын
That sea god threatening part was true .... But he only threatened him as the sea refused to part