did you get the Aer 28L backpack? howd you find it?

@@ems9097 I did, literally just used it yesterday. It's bigger and heavier than I thought it'd be, but it's fine for me personally. I have some Peak Design packing cubes that fit perfectly in this bag, so it's been great. This size feels huge to me, so I can't imagine having the larger size tbh

thanks for your reply! im tossing between 28L vs the 35L but im only 165cm in height so the 35L might be way too big. I saw that it weighs about 1.7kg, did you find this quite taxing on the body on top of the stuff you have inside? Im contemplating this backpack for my upcoming travels@@terranceharris3675

How did that work out for you? I am looking for something to fit under the seat as well. Appreciate your help.

Does „fitting under the seat“ mean that it doesn‘t count as a carry-on luggage but rather an accessoire? Meaning you could travel with a check-in bag, a carry-on AND the small AER travel bag? :o

@@l-vinotrading4450Each airline has its own dimensions for what they call a “personal item,” which doesn’t count as a carryon. There are measurement devices in airports that you can check these with for your individual airline. In the US, 18x14x8 inches is often the standard for a personal item on budget carriers who otherwise charge for “carry-on bags.” Some in Europe are even more restrictive. Sometimes you can get away with slightly larger, but if an airline agent decides they want to check the size of your bag and it doesn’t fit, even if advertised as “under the seat capable” then you will be charged for carry-on. I went with Cabin Zero for my recent backpack purchase because it’s lighter than the Aer, and doesn’t have so many of the small pockets that I won’t use. Also costs less. Not as cool looking or high-quality, though. But their bags are made with personal-item standards in mind, as far as I can tell. The Aer City PAC Pro is another option I considered-slightly smaller than the Travel Pac 3 Small.

そもそもバッグの生地が厚手なので、そこまで薄くはならないです。 容量が2/3くらいになるイメージかと

Have you found your answer? I'm still picking between the 2 with a similar height and weight While the TP3S has load lifters, the CPP is lighter for EDC... Tough choice. I'd go for the TP3 but I already have a travel pack covered.

Yea, it’s definitely a tough choice, I didn’t have a travel bag or edc so I decided the Travel Pack 3 was the one I picked. I use it everyday and it’s not too heavy, but the main reason is the tech pouch, I use it so often id hate not having it in the cpp. I took it on delta flights and it fit under the seat for me with no problems really either, as long as you keep to the bigger airlines. I wouldn’t want it any other way, but if you want it simple, light, got like a tech cube, the cpp would be fine as well. I hope this helps. I didn’t get the xpac too btw, looked too crinkly

@@Trivski Thanks for the reply but my search continues... Although I always carry a 30L ish backpack for my EDC because of my height, (shorter backpacks are often too snug and look ridiculous) even opted for the Xpac for that slightly reduced weight, 2kg for an EDC still seems a bit much especially in a warm climate where I am. Also most airlines here have a 7kg carry on limit. I'd go for the city pack pro but wtf were they thinking with that admin section? Looking at the flight pack 3 now...

I have this same dilemma. Hope someone can chime in!

@@user-bt3bn3tb7p hmm my thoughts are some airlines may not even consider the small as small enough for a personal item so it seems like a no brainer to get the regular version. I mean surely just put it in the overhead cabin

@@OnyxSinon thanks, but I’m not looking to use this as my one carry on that can just go into the bin (slowly whittling down what I pack but not at one bag yet) since I usually travel w/ a carry on roller that goes there already. I’m looking for a pack that will fit underneath the seat. Looking around more I saw someone on another channel’s comments that mentioned they fit the regular size fully packed underneath just fine on some airlines with no issues, and even more people that said the small version had no issues at all, even on international flights. So I’m probably going to go with small.

I have the older Travel Pack 2 33L. I fly at least 1-2 times a week in the spring and summer months for my work (US Domestic mostly) over the past 3 years, so I have had extensive use flying with the pack. I usually travel for 3-5 days at a time and put all my clothes in here while my carry on is some gear that I bring with me. I have a pretty big frame, 6’3” 265lbs so I would say that I fill out the larger pack to the point where it doesn’t look like an overtly big backpack on my back (that’s also due to the stealthy nature of aer). I’ve never once had someone fight me with using this as my personal item. It does fit under the seat easily unless you have it packed to the gills. Because it’s not as rigid as say the Peak Design or Nomatic it’s easy to squish under a seat.

@@OnyxSinon In US I'd be surprised, it's only longer by 1 inch than most guidelines, it's like super lax in the US tbh. There's almost 0 chance they would give you hard time with the small one. large one, I'd be a bit more nervous but the other dude says it's been fine

Yes for me when I flew with Ryanair and easyJet.

Its a muji ziplock pouch. I have the same one to store my masks, you can store about 5pcs in them any more they might not seal as well

そーですね 薄く使うことはできますが、縦横のサイズは大きく感じると思います！ 部屋数が多く、仕切りの布の分の重さもを考えると、全体的に重めなバックパックなので、通勤メインで使うにはあまりちょっとオーバースペックかもしれません。 ただ、これ一個で宿泊を想定した移動までこなしたい！って場合はかなり頼りになると思います。

@@imigram ご丁寧に返信ありがとうございます！ やはり普段使いだけだと少しオーバースペックですよね… 用途踏まえ他のAerのバックパックも見てみたいと思います

フィードバックありがとうございます！ お陰様で照明機材も潤沢になり、 最新の動画は明るめで行かして頂いております😌

これです！ kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mrKWlNB2ztXcdac.html

節電だいじ😌