thank you! this is so motiviational

THANK YOU!

Thanks also I put alot of practicing into math and I might be able to become a engineer as grown up and I got a 85 in my math class in school right now and I’m bad at reading but engineering is my thing to go😁

Follow your heart and no matter who discourages you and puts you down never give up love from India❤️❤️

Thank you so much❤️❤️❤️

How did it go, I'm on the same path it's my dream to be an aerospace engineer

Xknot Alpha You there yet?

Update?

so how’d it go?

I35uio I got admissions in many international universities, but I couldn’t study because they were high-tuitioned

@@asmedues4052 So sorry to hear that happened, were you able to find an institution that didn't have such high academic fees?

@@navangelicfeathers Unfortunately, i couldn't Such a bad world !

sharon glory What math courses do you have to take?

sharon glory hii brooo PLZZ guide me

Future Trunks all of them

@@andrewlopez7312 ALL OF THEM?!?!

Oumshka Trigonometry, Pre-Calculus, Calculus, Linear Algebra, and differential equation.

I'm sorry but I'm confused about what you said

Alexander Ching you mean master in Aeronautical engineering? But why in Italy?

did you made it?

@@eduardoinostroza5212 No, I shifted. Haha!

I’m not saying you told me to say this or noting but I’m actually super good at math like 2-3 years advanced for 6th grade and I’m studying trigonometry which is what engineers use for their job I’m doing good I’m not really struggling which means I have a good chance of passing a math course once I get to collage

+adrian33161 Structural Engineering is a focus in Civil Engineering, so it's not it's own engineering group. AE's usually take a class in structural analysis. My school makes me take two semesters worth. I plan to go into Structural Analysis of spacecraft right after graduation, mostly because it is the easiest way for an AE to get hired since no one likes structures, except me of course. We are more qualified for Aviation industry structures than a Civil Engineer. Therefore, go AE and focus closely in your statics, solid mech., structures, materials, and instrumentation classes.

+Tomas Topica Okay thank you very much.

want to know the same thing

jay pandya For that you wanna go the astronomy/pure physics route.

iamawesome19991 oh thanks like PHD in physics or masters in physics

+jay pandya Ph.D. I think. Look it up

Aeronautical engineering Kin kin NITs me hai

Lemmiwinks 025 sounds good, hows it working out?

did you get there?

Jesse Medina iam the same can't decide between aerospace or mechanical

Great thing im from Houston!!!

It's PC bullshit. All about encouraging women to get into engineering, to which most of them are not as naturally inclined as men.

@Jakonate wtf r u serious? Tell me RIGHT NOW where is your university, I'm coming😂 You have 50/50, I have like 1 female per 30 men in my classes

@Jakonate i'm from Italy, but I will be there in 5 minutes😂

conacal rubdur Except that it is. There was a study where if women took a test and were told before the test started, that men did better than women on the test, the women wouldn’t do well. However if they were told nothing, they got high scores. If you tell women they can’t do STEM, some women will just feel like they really can’t do it, and there’s a lot of sexual harassment and abuse in women in STEM fields.

@conacal rubdur Alright let's first of all break up your bullshit. Lets start off with the constant strawman arguments you make, I have NEVER said "Women avoid STEM subjects because of harassment" nor have I ever said "Women avoid STEM subjects just because someone tells them too". I'm responding to your bullshit claim that "it's usually not prejudice" that women don't go into STEM fields, when in fact it has alot to do with prejudice. Second, Andrew's statement is prejudiced because Andrew's statement is not scientifically backed up (Interesting you didn't ask him a study on his false claim). Because I cannot post links due to KZfaq's weird thing where it won't show my comment, i'll give you the website and the quote from it aswell. This one is about Andrews statement: Website: (Bustle) One of the biggest fallacies about the lack of women in STEM - aka, science, engineering, technology and mathematics - is the widespread, incorrect belief that their brains just “aren’t made for it.” Despite copious evidence that women do just fine in STEM fields at the highest possible level, including nabbing two Nobel Prizes in Physics and Chemistry in 2018, the idea that we’re somehow neurologically less capable than boys is a deeply held one. A new study has just blasted the myth away, though, and made it clear that when it comes to science, math and tech, girls come out of high school just as passionate and well-qualified as boys are. Australian researchers published their analysis in Nature Communications, and it’s as comprehensive as it gets. It covered 16 million students worldwide, across 227 different studies that occurred from 1931 to 2013, and found that girls are not only not at a “disadvantage” when it comes to their grades in STEM subjects in high school, they do better at them than boys. On average, this study found, girls performed 3.1 percent better in STEM subjects in all the studies, and their results were 7.6 percent less varied - meaning that they scored consistently in the same cluster of scores, while boys showed a wider range of scores from low to high. This quote is from the website phys: "A new study, led by UNSW Sydney Ph.D. student Rose O'Dea, has explored patterns in academic grades of 1.6 million students, showing that girls and boys perform very similarly in STEM-including at the top of the class. The analysis, published today in prestigious journal Nature Communications, casts doubt on the view that there are fewer women in STEM-related jobs because they aren't as capable in those subjects as men-a notion that has been supported by the concept that gender differences in variability lead to gender gaps in associated fields. In their meta-analysis, the UNSW researchers compared gender differences in variation of academic grades from over 1.6 million students aged six through to university from all over the world, across 268 different schools and classrooms. "We combined data from hundreds of studies, and used a method developed by my supervisor to comprehensively test for greater male variability in academic performance," lead author Rose O'Dea says. A classroom with more variable grades indicates a bigger gap between high and low performing students, and greater male variability could result in boys outnumbering girls at the top and bottom of the class. "Greater male variability is an old idea that people have used to claim that there will always be more male geniuses-and fools-in society," O'Dea says. The team found that on average, girls' grades were higher than boys', and girls' grades were less variable than boys'. "We already knew that girls routinely outperform boys at school, and we also expected female grades to be less variable than those of males, so that wasn't surprising. In fact, our study suggests that these two factors haven't changed in 80 years," O'Dea says. "However, what was most surprising was that both of these gender differences were far larger in non-STEM subjects, like English. In STEM subjects girls and boys received surprisingly similar grades, in both average and variability." In other words, the researchers demonstrated that academic STEM achievements of boys and girls are very similar-in fact, the analysis suggests that the top 10% of a class contained equal numbers of girls and boys. O'Dea says that there are multiple reasons that these figures don't translate into equivalent participation in STEM jobs later in life. "Even if men and women have equal abilities, STEM isn't an equal playing field for women-and so women often go down paths with less male competition."For example, we found that the ability overlap between girls and boys is much greater in STEM, and smaller in non-STEM subjects, meaning that there are fewer boys competing with girls in non-STEM subjects. "So say you're a girl in a class and you're a straight A student. In your math class, you're surrounded by top-achieving boys, and then in English there's fewer boys that you're competing with, so it can look like non-STEM is an easier option or a safer path." Stereotypical societal beliefs about what fields girls are seen to be successful in also play a role."Girls are susceptible to conforming to stereotypes in the traditionally male-dominated fields of STEM. Girls who try to succeed in these fields are often hindered by backlash effects," O'Dea says. "For example, the stereotype that girls aren't good at maths actually makes it harder for girls to be good at maths, both because of the way we perceive ourselves and the way other people perceive us. We all have subconscious biases, and there's a strange phenomenon called stereotype threat, where being reminded of the stereotype connected to your identity can make it harder to defy that stereotype." O'Dea says that there's no simple fix to work on the underrepresentation of women in STEM. "Science and academia have a lot of structural issues that will take time to fix. However, there's a lot we can do to encourage girls to perform better at maths-for example, girls tend to do better when they're taught by a woman with a strong maths background, so they can see they can do maths, too." Professor Emma Johnston, Dean of Science at UNSW, says a lot needs to be done to encourage girls to choose a STEM path."This powerful, evidence-based research has revealed that girls and boys are equally good at STEM subjects. Differential participation in STEM training and STEM careers must therefore be explained by other factors. "Australia really needs more women to enter, stay, and succeed in STEM areas. We absolutely need to change the structural barriers to gender equality in science, but we must also change the strong negative stereotypes and unconscious biases as well. We must give our girls and women more successful science role models-something grand to aspire to. "We all need to actively work to close this gap-for example, UNSW's Women in Maths and Science Champions Program is a unique opportunity to support women who are completing their Ph.D. in UNSW Science. The program focuses on strengthening the cohort's communication and leadership skills to support their professional careers and their lifelong role of advocacy to inspire women to pursue a career in maths and science. "The author of this landmark study is a great example-Rose is an incredible role model and her leadership in traditionally male-dominated fields like science and the AFL is inspiring to many girls," Professor Johnston concludes."

DORC101 yea that is CATIA that she's using. i learnt it by watching videos on youtube. But haven't really put my skills to test. When i tried studying it online ,there were very few resources available.

Welp that’s a stark contrast.

Those are very different paths. Lol

Aerospace= Computers, Calculus, programming, design, manufacturing, systems analysis. Zoology= animal behavior, biological systems, taxonomy, habitat design and safety, research, and life development. Your Call

Ace Ventura: When nature calls

Same but if thinking about this or chemical engineering

+Mechanical Engineer. Hey there. Is it possible to specialize in or do both aerodynamics and thermodynamics/propulsion. They both really enthrall me and would like to really work on both? Secondly, considering that each of the sub fields are heavy (require a lot of learning) on their own would it also be practical to specialize or do both aerodynamics and thermodynamics/propulsion?

I'm not an engineer, but I believe you'll find that aerospace engineering is typically divided into three major categories: Propulsion and Aerodynamics; Structures and Materials, and: Dynamics (Space/Astro) and Control. You can go onto the websites of different universities (MIT, Carnegie-Mellon, Rensselaer, Embry-Riddle, Stanford, etc.) and check out their course requirements for their various degrees. So the answer to your question is "Yes, you'll probably be required to 'specialize' in both", but you'll definitely need an advanced degree , at least a Master's Degree, if you want to get a career designing and testing stuff in an Aerospace R&D lab.

Morphn'

wing nn that's the government track

wing nn fuk NASA. Space x is the future

Did you end up with nasa?

U can also become a pilot

***** Yh I know that sucks

+Shaka Brah some of them say you have to have perfect teeth and of course the perfect eyesight

***** how does one "working hard enough" ?

dom1abc1mbc yes

dom1abc1mbc DONT SAY THAT. Believe in yourself!

Amany .A 😂

+Super Clorox Bleach thats not a benifit to me at all

If you really want to work for the government it wouldn't hurt to start in the air force

im wanting to be a weapons contracter i dont want to work for the airforce

+jacobs industries im gonna sell to the airforce

You have to have military experience to be a weapons contractor

Aravind Srinivasan lol

She's cute.

Aravind Srinivasan plenty of beautiful smart women out there lol you don't need her

She's out of your league, mein dood. Women tend to marry up or look for highly educated/ well earning/ influential partners. Trust me. After I started working my first real job and doing my PhD all of a sudden there were so many female coworkers or just random acquaintances who, upon hearing I was gonna be a "Doctor" one day, magically started becoming interested in me and started flirting with me. And these were the type of women who never would have shown any interest in me, back when I was a lousy college student who couldn't even afford a car. But now it's like: *"Oh, so you are writing - like - your PhD thesis? Ohmigosh that sounds so hard/ exciting. Is - like - your girlfriend a scientist, too?" plays with hair* Not kidding. Women are quite petty and superficial. And that's coming from someone who thought girls' farts don't smell when he was in elementary school (I actually thought that). :-/ So long story short: I don't know a single woman with a PhD (and I know quite a few) who did NOT get together and/or marry a man who also has a PhD or is in some other way extremely successful... It doesn't matter how good looking you are, how nice you are or how ripped you are (though I guess it doesn't hurt). Women will always _always_ go for the most successful guy.

That girl is fucking ugly and has a flat ass. How do you niggas think that she is cute oml. No standard these days. Never knew that u niggas liked girls with no breast or bum

+sabbel babbel depends on the field of engineering you chose and the level of degree you obtained in that discipline.

Mauricio Bridgewater ive heard that even phds struggle finding good jobs..

+sabbel babbel even so..the demand for engineers is very high as the world is looking to advance technology and infrastructure in most fields..some fields are experiencing a bit of stagnation like aerospace for example..whereas fields like biomedical or petroleum are in fast pace motion..all depends on the field they chose and the need for it currently

Mauricio Bridgewater​​ i mean i dunno about US or the world in general i just read a few articles about engineers in germany, unable to find a good job (one about a mech. eng. The other about an electric eng.) Edit: i dont know, maybe its just in germany the case..

+sabbel babbel it's just Germany lol....Canada in example is looking for engineers to help develop their infrastructure in the medical, aerospace, civil, environmental etc...and there is always a place for upcoming engineers in the US etc.....new graduates within the next 6-10 should also be good since they will have to replace the workforce that have retired

W Davis Really?!!

+Histoire Chan Tbh, math is just following instructions and using formula

+Siddharth Nair you have to think of out the box too

+Histoire Chan What I'm doing is getting into my Aerospace degree and then deferring for a year (gap year) and getting more proficient at maths and physics. Then hopefully after a year of finding out my end goal and learning everything there is to know about maths, I will breeze through the course. hopefully.

chinta mat kar beta , jaisa siddhartha bol raha hain wahi sahi hain... mera bhi yahi problem tha maths mein, mujhe dar lagta tha is subject mein par us samay mein shikshak ke baat nahi sunta tha theek se , par jabse ye karbe lagya tab se mere to mano lottery nikal gaye.... jai hind and per aruda

*Sorry if this is too long* *TL;DR* I got f's in my physics class last year (junior year) but the only reason why I passed was because he had this one assignment where if you built some model satilties you would get some major f***ing points. So at the end of both semesters I barely passes with a D- :( But the thing is I find out about myself is that I'm more of a visual learner, I need to physical see it, and do that exact thing over and over again until I finally get it (I'm a slower learner too). But in his class he was all about verbal teaching and he barely physically showed what it was representing. He wrote the formulas down. But in the tests you have to desiected it,ex: E=mc^2 (I know this one's easy but it's the only one I can actually do right now) So on the test we would have to rewrite it as "c=?" But with more difficult equations. So when I finally got it *c=√(E/m)* we would move onto new formulas and equations. So, once I finally got a grasps of something and understood it, we would move on and I would only see it for 1 more time that whole school year (the final test). But he even told us that he had one kid in all of his classes that had an A+. I know physics is hard but if taught well to a point that the students understood it he would've had way more students with A's. I know I could've passed that class with a way better score if he taught it more clearer. He said stuff like, "come on this is algebra 1 stuff", but the thing is that in my algebra 1 class all we did was easy equations and basically did the same thing the whole year just had some stuff changed. Also that was two years ago (at that time) I live in the ghetto and go to a ghetto school with the worst graduation rate. So our school's teachers(some) aren't the greatest. But can't really blame all of it on the teachers. But again I know that I could've passes my physics class with a better score if only I wasn't so glued to my damn phone I've literally been on my phone(s) about 10 hours a day for the past 4 years. *I KNOW RIGHT!!!* But that what happens when you don't got any friends and been a social outcast for awhile. So the only advice I can give, too anyone also addicted to your phone is that, don't just get off of it, you don't have to watch everything, you don't have to keep up with everything, set a limit. Put it on silent. I can uncomfortably say that my unhealthy addiction to my phone has probably cost me of going to a nice school and getting a nice job/career. Additions are the worst.

Maybe if u try had

+The dog who went to space. No, you would be a mission specialist, which could include being the Flight Engineer.

Sorry, I noticed what I said was wrong. What I meant to say was "astronautics" not "aerospace". They are different studies...

I'm fairly certain Neil Armstrong had a degree in engineering, if that tells you anything.

You need to join the navy, become an officer,become a test pilot, and then you can be an astronaut

same here

Same =(

Did you find it? I'm struggling there two.

Spudzillah _ well both and a computer

Why dont you just teach yourself this? people do that now, forget the traditional way of this go read books about it

Horrible advice. No engineering firm or government organization will hire somebody for an intensive engineering position if said person doesn't have an engineering or science degree in or related to that field. To answer Dhiraj's question, possibly. If you got a bachelors in automobile engineering, I imagine that involves a lot of mechanical engineering. So you have the foundation for the graduate work you'd be doing as an aerospace engineer.

Ethan d Typical who says you need to work for someone, useless thinking, I bet youve wasted years doing that.

Ethan d Elon Musk taught himself aerospace engineering and alot of other great people have been self taught, raises questions why we hardly see great people like Thomas Edison again hmmmm because most people are programmed by formal education learning forged from prison and slavery.

Kay A Ah, yes, and you're the owner of a multi-million dollar company, huh? People don't want to become aerospace engineers because they want to "be their own boss". They want to be become aerospace engineers because they want to work on forwarding the aerospace industry, whether it be by designing the next better supersonic aircraft or pushing the limits of space exploration. All fantasies of starting up a company from scratch aside, in the real world, if you want to work in this sort of field, you need a degree. That simple. The reason that the people who make it WITHOUT degrees are news worthy is because they're incredibly, incredibly rare.

+L Kururugi (The Apex Truthseeker 荣誉) Legendary comment. xD

Great job!!

L Kururugi lmfao

Test pilots need math too lol

It is a specialisation in ME

Depends on what you want to be in life?

+Kay A I would like to work in the I+D departament of some company. I don't know if i would like to be in a big one or in a start-up (although if i were in a start-up i would like that it was mine), and of course some of my dreams are NASA, SaceX, Airbus, Boeing...

I'll say you go for aerospace engineering, it's like a specialised version of mechanical, as she said, it also teaches abit of mechanical. But aerospace is what you should go for I believe

Kay A What about the university? Do you know any of the ones i mentioned before? Do you know any other one?

Q99g Oh oh no im based in england

Two?

ae is a sausage fest

+나탈리아 Well, it depends on the speciality. On my university they have two specialities: Design that is what you saw on this video and there is Mainteinance on which they work directly with the airplane (motors, avionics, etc)

Mahmud abdullah al Anything is worth the time and effort if your really interested in it. Personally i don't think age is going to be a problem for you. And yes, your friend was partially right when he said that companies hire only Americans (thats assuming that thats what you meant by "your people"). Partially right because governmental agencies like NASA or the Air Force recruit only American nationals but i believe you do have a shot at private companies (as mentioned in this video). Hope that helps you out. Good luck !!

+Aravind Retnakumar, yknow, going by the context, I'd say he made a typo and what he really meant was 'young' not 'your'. Just sayin.

JUST DO IT

Mahmud abdullah al u

Some engineers in aerospace use their knowledge and experience in the biological sciences fairly frequently; say, when they design G-suits to distribute G-forces across the human body, or when they design life support systems or other closed biological loops that are built into things like spacecraft and space stations. However, if you're planning on doing what these people in particular discussed, then no, no biology probably won't help you directly. On the other hand, the experience you garnish in any science class, whether it be biology or physics, is useful in this sort of field. It teaches you how to work in a laboratory setting, how to take clear and concise measurements, how to efficiently and effectively record data, and how to work with your hands (with dissections and other lab work).

Ethan d so some engineers need to be good at biology but some only need to know the basics. that's what your saying right ??

tom neil I'm saying it depends on your specialization. If you're an aerospace engineer working on propulsion, odds are you won't need to know a lick of biology. If you're an aerospace engineer working on cabin design and life support systems, yeah, you'll probably have to have at least a general understanding of human biology and the life sciences. It all depends on what you want to do.

thank you !

+laong laan In it's best form.

lol 1 in a 1000

Adam Rey Cooper I’m sure you have lots of interactions with women bud.

samuel ferrufino why did you say that

What makes you say that?

I know right! :/

Preciƨe VII cause it sounds hard and boring af.

samuel ferrufino I should have watched before joining college

It's not too late, if that's what you want to do! I'm 24 and only just transferred into ERAU's aerospace engineering program after graduating from community college. I'll be a junior next semester. If you feel you don't have a solid math and science foundation, you can still build one. When I was 21, I was only in college algebra, now I'm through calculus and taking differential equations. You say you're really smart; if a mind is a terrible thing to waste then that goes double for a good one :)

Don't settle for anything other than your passion!! 21 is still extremely young! I'm 26 and still have 2 more years before I'm ready to transfer, but I'm not giving up. The fact that you're just going back to school means that you have that much more time to participate in internship opportunities and programs. Talk to your STEM career coordinators at school and they will put you on the right path as far as academics and opportunities go. They will also provide adequate counseling. Good luck and dream BIG!

Don't worry you are not alone. I graduated from a community college in business administration and I decided to go for engineering instead and I was 20 at the time. It wasn't easy but now I'm comfortable with advanced calculus and physics and I love it, t's way more challenging than the stuff I did when I was a business major. A lot of people told me that I was crazy when I did the transition but I chose not to listen.

Agustín Ramires why?

Cobb It's a little slow during liftoff, but my contractors never complained.

Cobb quit being a moron. She's a smart woman, the kind you probably wouldn't have a shot with.