the only people that can demand for citizenship in my opinion is the europeans and americans because africans can also become citizens in those countries as well...but for a chineese talking abt citizenship from africans when ur govt hardly give work permit to africans ..that is a ridiculous demand
@The6672513 жыл бұрын
To get where is today, China relies on 996. Such as building a 39 stories skyscraper in 13 days, a modern RR station in 9 hours. China's model might or might not work in Africa, but it's African's choice.
@abulakangansihc26074 жыл бұрын
How come US interests in Africa are simply taken as benevolent as opposed to those of China in this discussion?
@ufundi14 жыл бұрын
Because we have 2 canines (China & the United States) ,,, one 'a wolf', the other 'a fox' - both having a predatory nature and a similar appetite regarding power/hegemony, but having different appearances and mannerisms.
@setumomahakoe77913 жыл бұрын
Us must not get involved in running the internal affairs of Zambia
@kantovagrant31942 жыл бұрын
Because, the US are enemies of China, it itself puts China in a negative light and vice versa. But it goes deeper than that, China has numerous human rights offense within it's countries as of late in which it works to genocide, torture and enslave certain minorities in order to and advanced market capital and to have free labor, in which China launched the Debt Trap Diplomacy to essentially buy the Zambian government and have them extort massively to the point in where the funds of your territory would go directly into funding there debt that they owe to the US ever since they where caught stealing and repurposing American technology in the technological expansion of the early 80's when America was naive to China.
@kongngocontreras87813 жыл бұрын
The western alliance should have offer loan for infrastructures before china enter the picture so that africans cant be victims of debt trap as they alleged. I think us govt have seen they are losing their influence in africa by their failure to do what china did to africa in the past decades.
@The6672513 жыл бұрын
The US provides support, the fish; while China is more project oriented, the fish pole/ net. Which do you like? The Answer: both.
@adriansicario62613 жыл бұрын
We prefer the second option. We don't want to be dependant on somebody else to give us fish we want to fish for ourselves.
@setumomahakoe77913 жыл бұрын
No one must dictate how to run internal affairs of Africa countries but only invest in development stated by that particular country
@setumomahakoe77913 жыл бұрын
No one must dictate how to run internal affairs of Africa countries but only invest in development stated by that particular country
@The6672513 жыл бұрын
US: Training? It's concentration camp! Fishing themselves? It's forced labor, nobody allowed to buy their fish.
@setumomahakoe77913 жыл бұрын
@@The667251 Let Africa dictate what is for lunch...guest will be invited - Period ( if any )
@richieDB5733 жыл бұрын
Muyengua she resemble Proff. Lumumba
@kongngocontreras87813 жыл бұрын
The us accused china exploiting africa and what accomplishment did us govt done for africa that they can be proud. Have they ever thought of developing africa or improve the life of african people. History can tell that its the reverse. When us started its railway they need chinese to do it in order to accomplish but did they give credit to the chinese workers for finishing it and did they paid a decent wage to these railway workers no. And these same govt criticized china is exploiting africa, they should be ashamed.
@kantovagrant31942 жыл бұрын
Don't forget about the Exxon Mobil scandel in Equatorial Guinea, where they PAID a Teodoro 1 billion dollars to essentially just hand the US government every single drop of offshore oil reserves which where initially worth 102 trillion dollars which would've literally been able to reinvigorate the entirety of all African countries economies respectively into becoming a mid to second tier world country.
@kantovagrant31942 жыл бұрын
What Africa essentially needs is not a period of colonialism, but a educational renaissance where the territory goes through a period of governmental isolation, in which each territory within Africa would need to formulate internal trade systems before interacting with any other country, which would include railroad systems, and the formalizaition of a Unification of states such as the AU but reprocessed that would work on the establishment of trade.
@kantovagrant31942 жыл бұрын
But in relative honesty, it will be impossible for Africa as a whole without some form of both cohesion in the compression of the territory becoming a unilateral country instead of 54 divided countries with independent legislature as each countries legislature would independently either set itself behind or ahead via some decision.