Yea in a studio you'll eventually have complete AI automation of shots by combining Stable Diffusion with cheap 6 axis camera position control, 3 axis is already only $300 at 2.6lb max load. And a gantry system for the other 3 axis can be DIYed for $900 today. All that left is software developement. Having auto control of settings will be crucial to make this work.

Why would that not be compensated for by the auto? Like i agree its because of the filter but in theory the awb should compensate for it,

The colour of the sky and sand changes as there is less off both ​@@bloodybrit127

🤣@@cybyrd9615

Because it is the front-facing external light sensor that measures auto white balance.@@bloodybrit127

This is exactly what I was thinking.

Same here! although I switched few years ago, I stilled missed the screen mechanism.

Outstanding observation

Makes sense

The A7R V like all newer Sonys has a small WB sensor next to the grip. Maybe he was blocking it

You hit the nail on the head.

Exactly!

Bring it brother can’t wait to watch it 👏👏👏

Oh an if you could can you touch on the “tracking on” feature and how you manage it in video?

Changing file size was a big limitation with the early Sony's. Nikon has always been able to do this.

@@gosman949 that’s awesome! Glad Sony finally did it. Helps a ton. I always don’t need 60 megapixel files.

It's a great feature! The Canon 5D Mark IV had this and I loved it and used it all the time. I kind of wish the R5 had this though Canon files are much smaller than Sony files and compressed raw makes them even smaller without any noticeable loss in quality. I'd still prefer a choice of resolution though.

@@77dris I shoot Sony but I miss the file size from the Canons. I have not seen any explanation as to why Sony's raw's are around twice the size of canon. People say Canons uncompressed raw, is compressed but that does not explain the size difference in Sony's compressed vs Canons compressed. Time is money and large files take longer to work.

@@gosman949 So it's solved right now, what's your point then? Nikon no longer is in the big market

I think the a6700 is the only one that has "fixed" colors (at least, they're very, very similar to Fujis for skintone). Even the A7Cii and A7IV have such janky colors in jpeg. I'm hoping they'll use the same recipe for upcoming releases because it really is a big annoyance. How hard can it be?

😂😂😂

Yeah is the sucker giving it away?

lol this guy doesnt even reply to comments bro

auto wb sensor isn't thru the lens?

No, there is a separate sensor between the handgrip and the lens body that is used for WB calculations. It’s been combined with the low light af illumination light.

He's using a circular polarizer which you can see at timestamp 5:00. When rotating the camera and not readjusting the polarizer the colors will be different.

What are you talking about???? You can edit one photo from the same scene and paste the edit to the other photos with awb or fixed wb. This isn't video man.

@@RicanStudio If i am not mistaken you may see lightroom telling you that the images you've copy pasted your custom WB onto are all for example 5600K but in my experience this isn't the case at all when shot with awb. It's 5600K but from what lightroom thinks was originally shot at with awb. Meaning you may see different color tones on images that have the same kelvin value according to lightroom. Correct me if i am wrong cause i am far away from my computer now to properly test it but as i recall i would see edited AWB shots at 5600k that one would be warmer and the other would be cooler looking despite the fact that both of them were afterwards edited at a custom Kelvin of 5600. Then there's also the signal to noise ratio that is changing when the AWB is off in your viewfinder, it also changes your exposure, yellowish warmer tones are brighter than bluer cooler ones thus if your awb chooses a warmer tone than what the scene needs then you will expose according to it and when you'll be in post processing when you will be cooling the image down towards blue you'll have to raise back up the exposure and thus introducing unwanted noise. While if you have already set a correct kelvin exposure as you wanted to straight from the start you would properly expose for that colour's brightness. Granted the noise you'll notice it's marginal but it's there, especially on a 61mpx sensor like with the A7RV it shows. This becomes a problem if you use AWB on sunset/sunrise shots, where most AWB algorithms will always choose a warmer WB thus making you underexposing the RAW file in the beginning. So the "moto" AWB doesn't affect the RAW file is completely false. Another reason i will avoid AWB is when i am shooting panoramas or focus stacked images, I can't have discoloration between frames i plan to merge and why should i worry about it in the first place and always have to think to change to manual AWB when i need to take a pano? I just leave mine fixed at 5800K(personal taste) and I'll almost never mess with it till i sell my camera. Except for certain occasions like astrophotography or night snowy landscapes which i need to cool down the scene and in some rare instances when it's heavily cloudy. These reasons had me over the years totally avoid any auto settings on any camera, including AWB. Even if my estimation on my first observation turns out to be wrong there's still the issue of not properly exposing scenes and introducing noise and also the discolouration you'll get between frames when doing, panos, hdr, focus stacks etc.

I'm looking forward to the A7V in a couple years :)

U can throw the A1, my way since it's useless to u in ur storage locker. Destination: Fairbanks, Alaska. 😎😎

You don't have to switch if it's working for you. This type of video is not helping people watching this channel. The problem is those channels can afford to switch, but that's not the message to be fueled to subscribers. All cameras since 2012 are amazing. All mirrorless of today are overkill

Pretty sure Manny is sponsored by Sony to switch from Sony to Sony. Saw him on Sony ads in Best Buy.

I actually switched to Sony from being a 40 + Nikon user ( well I didn’t switch I just bought into Sony to see what all the hype was) I had a Z9 plus good Nikon glass. I used the Sony A7iv and the Sony A7rV and good glass . 2 months later I sold the Sony kit ! Nikon ergo and build quality is something that to me is very important. The Sony is very capable but I had no connection to it, it was not something I got any pleasure from using .

Sad news for u, I'm afraid. U can also get Sigma Art Primes in Sony E mount. Oh well, u could just consider doubling up and get the Sony bodies--all of them--sounds like u have plenty of cash from studio shoots, etc. Then u could have Sigma Primes on both sets of bodies, Nikon and Sony. U could use Nikon on: Mon, Wed, Fri and Sony on Tues, Thurs, Sat--Sunday off day. Day of Rest. Poor cameras & lenses will probably be overworked and overstressed, anyhow. 😎😎

I shoot mostly on XT4 but still have my 6mp Nikon D40. I have tried sony/Canon and find heir colors to be bland in comparison to Fuji and Nikon in Stills. It is purely subjective. KZfaqrs are only switching to them because they are better in Video and autofocus. But for stills, all go for Fuji or Nikon.

RV = R5?

@@saganandroid4175 yes

Not, I have shot R5, RV the AutoFocus is another Level @@saganandroid4175

Do you recommend me to buy a7r v

It no happens on Zeiss and G Master lenses

No it’s weather sealed, possibly exchange it or try to blow it out as perhaps it’s not actually inside but on the screen itself

And it still provides the higest amount of image quality in combination with ISO performance. After the A7RIII the image quality went down. It’s unmatchted by the A1 nor the A7RIV or RV.

I would say image quality already reach its bottleneck sometime ago.. the differences between camera body now are the af speed… buffer.. read speed… etc.

I still use my Riii more than the Rv. One of the best sensors ever made imo.

I own 2x A7IV and 2x A9 and thinking to consolidate my gear to get A7RV or A1. I’m back and forth between the two choices depending on the day, but I think A1 might take the win for Electronic Shutter but then I want the A7RV screen!

@@leo_hoang the a7rv screen is bad it's look like a 20year old touch screen ( you see all the point on the screen) and wen you focus the resolution drop so much that you can't see if the frame is in focus or not I sold my a7rv for that reason

@@denis5850 I've seen this comment before by some others and have not seen it on my copy of camera.

@@denis5850 the A7RV has the new mechanism which is what intrigues me. Literally boxing up my 2xA7IV’s and 1xA9 to Part-Exchange for the A1. For me it’s the sensor technology that’s winning this. I hope I don’t regret this choice! Lol

@@leo_hoang you won't regret A1. It is like A9 with larger sensor except mechanical.shutter is quiet unlike a9

That’s still a few years ahead to go

@@DreySantesson I’m totally ok with that. Love my A7 IV but that feature would make it even better. 💪

dont be surprise if they dont.. because Sony want people to buy the A7RV.. so they might not put it on other camera bodies. lol.

@@sgpork I don’t think so. I guess this will be the standard for all new FF Sonys. The main reason to buy the R-series will be the resolution.

It will be on the A1 ii and then there will be a video "why I switched to the A1 ii"