SMH.

well while it wasnt allowed in the trial, he was on probation at the time for theft and having an illegal gun. so while the 3 dudes were justly convicted, he actually walked onto someone elses property, while on probation for a theft and gun charge.thats an insane risk. see, little kids playing and a couple love birds can get away with it. and yeah, I am not buying he was looking for water... this isnt the rio grande, theres stores literally around the corner one the main street.

He gone for life 😮

​@@Fat12219without the possibility of parole😊 away from black ppl😊

Jesus is the truth

Although I agree with the verdict, this isn't accurate at all...

Arbery grabbed the gun and started fighting over it

@@psyskeptic9979 It's not self-defense if you're the aggressor........ Arbery was trying to run away and they chased him in a truck, they might have had good intentions (suspicion of burglary etc) but that was a sign of aggression making Arbery fear for his life (rightly so as it turns out). It's been a good week for the judicial system, Ritenhouse, and now this trial with the correct outcomes.

@@psyskeptic9979 If You We're Black You'd Understand That It's Instinctive To RUN From White Boys In White Trucks With Guns And Confederate Flags On Their License Plate. 🤔 He Was Fighting For His Life Stupid!! SMH😡😤

People aren’t questioning that. People are questioning whether he was actually a “jogger” lol where in the running section do they sell khaki shorts? Or are they khaki running shorts sold on the business section

Yeah this is very true, me and my wife walked into homes being built atleast 5 times in the neighborhood while ours was being finished.

Well said

@@Mehhl81 at night?

@@javierj9345 Do you need to have running gear to go jogging?

Lol

Absolutely.

It almost was covered up. If there was no video it would have been another Travon Martin.

Their lifestyle is 0ver 😮

Their lifestyle is 0ver 😮

@@russellupsumgrub9633 👍

@Hank R. Hill Strickland Propane with the majority of the people

@@angelabender8132 we have law enforcement for a reason

@Hank R. Hill Strickland Propane If you want to live in a place where a man can’t run without fearing for their life, move to communist China and gtfo of America 🇺🇸

All of a sudden all you pukes love law enforcement lol

Agree

They did catch up to him after the recognized him from an ealrier incident, but he took a sharp turn and grabbed the gun and started hitting. Lesser charges for Travis, and aquittals for the other two would have been my vote.

@@psyskeptic9979 if a bunch of hicks with guns pulled up and blocked your way tf would you have done?

@@Premium-Content I'd run directly at them and try to take their gun

Not sure but I think for each felony offense

Apparently he had 3 lives. Kinda like a cat. A catburgler.

Just in case they didint hear the fist or fourth time. Normal procedure in criminal court

@@usualsuspectsfor1k so he is a burglar now? lmaooo

The same action can me more than 1 crime

And I agree with this statement.

Just a week ago - a white guy was exonerated for killing two white guys when he had no business even being there. Maybe someone woke up.

@T V Just curious ... does Arbery -- choosing NOT to run across a field or an unmowed lawn, or across a ditch _ shallow or not_ or across and into someone elses's property ( which could even make him look more suspicious to someone like yourself ) -- does that in any way make it okay for McMichaels to kill him ? McMichaels says Arbery was in Larry English property and that he MIGHT have stolen something. English says Arbery didn't take anything. Now -- get this -- Larry English -- PROPERTY OWNER -- says he barely knew McMicaels and NEVER asked him to patrol or protect his property. SOooo .... IF Arbery was a "threat " for looking around English house - under construction - WHAT the HELL was McMichaels, when he trespassed on the SAME property with a shotgun? WHO was more of a threat ? Who was a threat when he and his daddy -- armed with firearms, TRESPASSING -- confronted homeless people on the dock , when the owner of the property says HE NEVER asked them to protect his property ? I'd love to hear you rationalize, how an armed trespasser is less of a threat just because he lives closer to a property that he doesn't have any permission to be on either ? Please ... please do. They can appeal all they want. They're guilty.

@T V I accept the juries verdict in the Rittenhouse case, but I do wish the prosecution had asked Rittenhouse a few more questions, like --- " How much did you or your friend spend on that Smith & Wesson M&P 15 with the 30 round clip and the live ammunition ? -- $1200.00 -- And how much did you spend on the medical supplies you were going to use to help save the lives of -- well -- Mr. Rossenbaum or Mr. Huber or for Gaige Grosskreutz ? ---- $ 80.00 to 150.00 including the pack -- How much for self contained PA system, so that you could help calm the crowd, or CLEAR ID - like a RED CROSS so people would know you're a "trained" medic ? --- NOTHING? -- Since, as it turns out, you were the only person who NEEDED to kill anybody, did you and your rifle deter or prevent any violence or did it cause a violent reaction in an already volatile situation ? Just curious .. was that a rational, or careful decision? Did you think about the consequences? If you were really so fearful for your own safety, would it have been wiser to stay home rather than arm yourself to enter a situation that you weren't trained or prepared for ? I wasn't there. So, I 'm not going to claim it was a bad verdict. Somewhere along the line, Kyle should have been sent home early.

@@justintyme2451 you are right that Kyle was dumb for being there heavily and visibly armed, but that doesn't affect the core of his self defense case in any way.

@@justintyme2451 you forgot to mention he was defending himself. But you are forgiven because you lefties love your criminals and refuse to see otherwise

Call the police for what!? Some dude snooping around a construction site without even being given a trespass warning?

They called the cops several other times. They never showed up. Wrong verdict. They should’ve been found not guilty on all charges

@@sclosangelesktown5409 on this one I disagree!even when the police did their interview the neighbor said maybe we shouldn't have chased him down!!they should have followed him and got a address or a license plate number if he got into a car! it wasn't like he was stealing equipment or property how do they know he wasn't a contractor that was looking at a few different properties I'm a contractor and when I have a few different properties that are close I will walk that way I can see the neighborhood gives me ideas on what sells in that neighborhood!!

@@beaujohnson7399 Happy Thanksgiving first off. It was reported that there were a string of burglaries in the area for a while. The owner of the house stated that he’s had equipment stolen several times so he set up a camera. This was never reported on MSM. MSM only reported what the Left wanted. The 3 were doomed from day 1. Arbury failed to surrender and wait for the police to show up. Instead, he fought the son, tried to attack the father and fought the son for the shotgun from the son. The father had a gun but never fired once. I would say manslaughter in the 2nd but not murder. This was not a premeditated act. MSM never reported that Arbury had been seen by many stealing equipment and breaking into homes prior to the incident. Arbury had a burglary charge prior to all this happening. I don’t believe justice was served. It was a lynching

@@sclosangelesktown5409 Yes. He set up a camera. And he NOT ONCE saw Ahmaud take anything from his property. Next!

It's going to be a lot like running backwards through a corn field.

Jesus is the truth

@@ElegyVio okay. Well, Jesus spoke. These guys went to jail. Fine by me.

This is fine just don't say white justice...you are racist

White justice? Race bait much?

@@javierj9345 I think he’s referring to everyone saying Kyle Rittenhouse is a murderer vigilante. Which he wasn’t, that was a case of legitimate self defense. This case is a different story though

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Jesus is the truth

Isn’t entering someone’s property whether construction or not ….a crime ?

@@Charmander009 Yes. Would you shoot someone that's running from you, simply because he trespassed?

Yep. All three criminals at that.😂😂😂😂

Simple. Racist thoughts is what drove them to their actions. Irony is that the video one of the killers took is what made sure this case came to light. If it wasn't for that, I 100% believe the killers would still be on the streets.

So ... Travis .. can you actually affirmatively IDENTIFY these "political figures " who want to " empty all the prisons and defund the police " ? There must be at least ONE that you can "quote ". .... out of 329,000,000 . Who is the culprit ? Does the culprit have the same power to mesmerize that Donald Trump apparently has ? ooohhh OOO ooooOOO ....

Defund the police, means reallocating some money from policing to other agencies funded by local municipalities. It does not advocate eliminating the police, or emptying out prisons. In a worst case scenario, we can always start a fundraiser to keep the three stooges incarcerated.

Defund the police is probably the incorrect wording to the concept.. it means using taxes by the people to use in better means, example when people with mental illness are behaving strangely we should have another agency we can call not the police, people attempting suicide like the case of the Asian young man that was killed by police recently, there should be another agency that is called and police should step down and wait not have their weapons drawn.. defund the police only means having other options... We still need the police because obviously when regular citizens try to uphold the law in their own hands of justice things can go awfully wrong.. police are essential, however we need other options in different scenarios.

Just the ones with the drug use. Non violent. I'm pretty sure the McMichael's were violent.

@@ranxerox692008 whoever came up with Defined the Police as a phrase obviously did not work for a marketing firm. A better phrase is needed.

Is the other one Kyle rittenhouse? Kyle is a hero and the jury got it right. I did not follow this one. So this was not a political issue? I asked that with not knowing anything about this case and more concern about prosecutors is bringing unwanted trials

@@TheHmurveit Shut up.

Despite what politicians and certain media outlets seem to suggest, most Americans aren’t racist and have a good sense of what’s right and wrong.

@@TheHmurveit The jury may have gotten it right, but Kyle is no hero. Vigilante justice never solves anything only makes things worse.

@@vwilliams8275 it wasn't vigilante justice. He went there to help as the police were ordered to stand down. So that way the mob rules when they need the mob to affect whatever they need to affect. Kyle was threatened and then defended himself. Then try to turn himself in but was attacked and shot when he saw a gun pointing to his head

I suppose you say this because of the Rittenhouse trial !? Now tell me will there be justice in the parade killings cuz thats just as disgusting or worse then what these losers did ! But yet the left sweeps it away cuz the narrative cant be used in their favor !

@@nathanh8620 The "Sabrina" person did not reference or even allude to any legal case or political affiliation. You're carrying all of that around and injecting your biases into everything you see. Get help.

Jesus is the truth

@Mr. Mojo Risin Babbitt yourself, boy.

@@nathanh8620 Jesus is the truth

the judge is not giving details on all the charges but they are different. he'll give the details during sentencing

Felony murder broadly speaking is charged when one commits a felony, and a murder occurs as a direct or indirect result. I understand the multiple charges reflect the individual felony charges (eg instances of aggrivated assault, false imprisonment) that all contributed to a murder occurring.

Because they earned them!

Because there were multiple felonies alleged and each alleged felony has a felony murder that attaches

Because of the number of Felonies each man committed. Each Felony committed results in a separate Felony Murder charge.

He had three lives. Kinda like a cat. A catburgler.

@@usualsuspectsfor1k And now your three buddies will be burgIarized.

A state's statute may define several different ways in which murder can be committed, typically involving different states of mind (i.e., intentional murder; knowing, but not intentional, murder; murder by a reckless act; murder by a killing during the course of another felony; etc etc etc depending on your state law). The prosecutor will charge any of these variations that could possibly apply.

@@onionbelly_ ok that makes sense, Thankyou

@@spencer8754 And the judge is leaving off some words like 'with a shotgun' 'with a handgun' 'with a truck'. And that 3rd guy was getting not guilties for the gun ones since he only had his truck.

@@spencer8754 The multiple counts being read for each defendant are felony murder, which broadly speaking is charged when one commits a felony, and a murder occurs as a direct or indirect result (even if the actual murder is committed by someone else). I understand the multiple charges reflect the individual felony charges (eg instances of aggrivated assault, false imprisonment) against the defendants that all contributed to a murder occurring.

Pretty sure he was the one who shot

He was the one who actually shot him. Other two are guilty by partaking in the chase and what not with him. Because of the details for malice murder they probably decided only the shooter deserved that charge.

@@PUSB_96 Ok--that makes sense. Thx

He is the only one that pulled the trigger and killed Arbery.

@@KayInMaine According to GEORGIA law it’s as if all 3 men had their fingers on the trigger thus felony murder for all 3 men.

ok ok I’ll roll with that one not bad

You mean like that guy that drove thru a crowd and was let out on bail?

God is the greatest 🙏🏼

@@ZachLagrandeur no I am comparing the case with Kyle rittenhouse. Like he deserves to walk free but not these guys! The one on bail was just a huge mistake!!! I really don’t understand what’s going on anymore🤦‍♀️

@@lucalu6416 Rittenhouse acted in self defense 100%. Not even remotely comparable.

@@ZachLagrandeur I agree!! This is just simple example that every case is different and those people who put everyone in the same bag are simply extremists ! Someone trying to change this country in the wrong directions under lying and using media to fake the true! Extremist people are the worst one to be around! They see only one color and that’s so wrong! :((

He did not deserve to die, correct. But it was not murder in the old sense of the word: Arbery tried to grab the gun and hit Travis. Travis pulled the trigger during that struggle. I would call that manslaughter, or at least a lesser charge than murder.

@@psyskeptic9979 Fair enough. Perhaps so.

@@psyskeptic9979 No, murder was correct. Let me ask you in the same situation what would you have done?

@@psyskeptic9979 so your solution would have been to let nice white men with guns do what they want with you rather than defend yourself. Only fact that matters is they killed an unarmed man and deserve all thats coming to them in this life and the next

@@psyskeptic9979 oh that's why he shot him 3 times.

Life without parole is standard in Georgia. But it is up to the judge I guess

How do you know that he wasn’t an innocent jogger? There isn’t a way for YOU to know that

@@cakeasaverb for some people, being black in certain spaces means you aren't innocent.

@@bestandbrightest or for some people it was how he was caught multiple times on their property stealing stuff and “jogging” in khaki shorts. No one jigs in khakis lmao you morons will defend any criminal. I bet you think George floyd was a great guy. And I bet you think the two scums that rittenhouse killed were outstanding citizens too

@@javierj9345 aw, look, a racist is butthurt. Good. Cry more about it.

@@javierj9345 actually if you watched any of the trial aside from what we were told he actually didn’t steal anything. He had been trespassing but the owner of the property had even said he didn’t steal anything

Been in the right about what? They hunted down and killed a man because they claim that they thought he stole/could be stealing something. But he wasn’t! So they would have called the cops and nothing would have happened? Why? because Ahmaud never committed a crime! They were NEVER in the right!

@@Tigeradams101 His comment obviously didn't say that any of what you said was right. That said, his comment was pretty redundant, as the implication is that if they hadn't chased him, they'd be in the right, but this also would never have gone to court. Or at least THEY wouldn't have. Arbery might have if he had been caught by police.

He's found guilty because he was with the other two. He allowed it to happen and did not step in to stop it.

Because what the hell else was AA supposed to do when 3 hicks with guns blocks his path and engage him? That’s like saying it’s self defense to break into someone’s house and shoot the homeowner if they pull a gun on you

@T V I agree! It was a stupid move but I don’t see charging a person with murder that didn’t kill anyone and as far as I could tell no intent on doing so. It was Aubrey that sealed his fate. Predicting a man coming at you with holding a legal shotgun is not something any sane person would do. It’s not a felony to pursue a possible robbery suspect. Sorry, the intent is not there in this case,

@@Premium-Content who mentioned self defense? Not me. Exactly what happened is what would be expected to happen. A man tried to take a shotgun and received 2 bullets. They were wrong in pursuing a robbery suspect in the first place but the other 2 didn’t show intent. Only a someone not playing with a full deck would attack a man carrying a legal loaded shotgun.

When netted his murder was these racist mouth breathers thinking it was open season on a black man

It happens all the time in black communities. Nothing new at all.

Why can’t you people just stay away from trouble.

@@suspicious2delicious oh, look, an overt racist. Cool. You don't see one of those every day. Get Babbitted, boy.

@@suspicious2delicious don’t care hahah their guilty 😊

I mean to stop hell, guess does away the judge and thing

I bet you said the same for Floyd.

@@Michael_J_M14 and justice prevailed then like it did today. Correct? So why is Michele stating that she has faith again in justice? If she actually thought that these fools would get away with murder, then she is delusional. Arbery got his justice today. These 3 stooges will be getting their crap pushed in for life.

I missed that also... can someone explain?

Felony murder: You do a felony where a foreseeable outcome can be death. And someone dies because of that felony, you go to jail for their murder. A law so that we can keep people who commit crimes which can result in death, incarcerated for longer.

"But a few months after the shooting, the authorities said that was hardly the full story: He had contributed to Mr. Arbery’s death by attempting to “confine and detain” Mr. Arbery with his vehicle, they charged."

Ahh... so his involvement began with the false imprisonment, which resulted in death ..

@@marthas8108 copy that

Yes, but I think that was evident from the outset. They're going to die in prison.

@@nychellebrewer long as the dude that mowed down the parade goers gets hate crime charges to , im good

@@estebanleacho9315 Why would he? That's not being investigated as a possible hate crime. The SUV killer was violent domestic abuser running from a knife fight before the cops could track him down. He wasn't motivated by prejudice based on race, religion, sexual orientation, etc. (which is how hate crimes are defined). He was just a raging nutjob. Arbery's murderers were thoughtful and methodical, working as a team to detain and assault someone based on his skin color.