Right strategy by Tuan Yang Dipertua. Avoiding by-election at this moment of time is important to keep the stability of the current government. Learn the lesson - effects of Tanjung Piai by election that leading to Langkah Sheraton.
法律不能用追回retrospective 的方法來定罪人的. 土團當时不全力支持反跳槽法也不马上修改党章來配合anti hopping law, so Bersatu does not come to the law with clean hand.这就是引起灰色地带的原因也被带上法庭。所以阿耀的第三論点是不成立的. 它跟DAP n Umno etc party 的情况是不一样的、不能相题并论,以后的cases 也不会跟土團的case 相似的
@simonbong186422 күн бұрын
如果DAP Umno 都修改党章而Bersatu 不修改這就是Bersatu 向大家展示他们容許他的MPs 有个别的行为,也成了先列opening the flood gate. 等到情况对自己不利的时候才來u 轉、就不容易把人定罪了,因为自己没有站在道德的高点
@chuajohn798521 күн бұрын
議長己經教訓國盟了,不給國盟顏色看,真是天理不容
@shwong407121 күн бұрын
總是補選只會浪費國家的資源和時間,請問人民是不是他們的老板
@chteh208622 күн бұрын
Same like Najib case, while legal proceed, Najib can still seat in Parliment.
How can speaker ask who they support to make decision.
@beesoo33919 күн бұрын
当然不要補选。浪费人民的時间和政府的钱。不如将那些钱拿去还債
@kahtk21 күн бұрын
如果悬空了纳闽的议席,那到时候法庭该怎么判?
@astonsoo661921 күн бұрын
🎉
@user-xv7wv2mw1r22 күн бұрын
反跳巢不完美,每一个灰色地带都有决定性,议长任何决定都没绝对的对或错。没什么大不了,就司法解决吧。
@khaylongtan730921 күн бұрын
若黨主席不開除議員,何來提出訴訟,何來議長不能縣空議席?
@Malaysia_Type-C22 күн бұрын
木薯议长😂
@sstan55221 күн бұрын
悬空议席是否有触犯宪法呢?
@Wdhhxssk-zl5nd22 күн бұрын
等法官判啦!你又不是法官。
@jylaw949521 күн бұрын
Based on the speaker decision,, whatever excuses given are just to protect current perpaduan gov. Hence, foresee in the very near future, PH gov will be callapsing. The misuse of power is ruining our lovely country 😢
@J.Brooklyn.189922 күн бұрын
I think speaker decision appoint by someone. Speaker just follow order