AI Art Generators, Explained | WSJ Tech News Briefing

Рет қаралды 30,087

Күн бұрын

Artificial intelligence has made it nearly effortless to create digital art.
WSJ senior personal tech columnist Joanna Stern tried out two AI art programs, OpenAI’s Dall-E 2 and Stability AI’s DreamStudio, and she joins host Julie Chang to explain how they work and their potential downsides.
www.wsj.com/articles/think-of...
Photo: Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
For more episodes of WSJ’s Tech News Briefing: link.chtbl.com/WSJTechNewsBri...
Visit the WSJ Podcast Center: on.wsj.com/3zTcL89
More from the Wall Street Journal:
Visit WSJ.com: www.wsj.com
Visit the WSJ Video Center: wsj.com/video
On Facebook: / videos
On Twitter: / wsj
On Snapchat: on.wsj.com/2ratjSM
#DallE2 #AIArt #WSJ

Пікірлер: 85

@rootcause2932 Жыл бұрын

Legit question, anyone knows how Julie Chang manages to sound this good, she used to sing or something like that?

@CradlePayne Жыл бұрын

AI. This answer was brought to you by AI, also. Have a good dAI.

@user-221i Жыл бұрын

Stable diffusion is open source and has no restriction. Stable diffusion is only restricted on website.

@whatsapp7461 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching; I'll be responding to your comments verbally on texts. Also have some interesting analysis to share📩📩📩

@chefkecia Жыл бұрын

Thank you. I was wondering what this was all about. You gave me the answers I was looking for.

@hihiya363 Жыл бұрын

Art is perhaps the best reflection of the state of society in the time of making I wonder what’s next after AI.

@nightheron5892 Жыл бұрын

Art continues but with less political import

@whatsapp7461 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching; I'll be responding to your comments verbally on texts. Also have some interesting analysis to share📩📩📩

@markcooperartcom Жыл бұрын

AI can't make art.

@jaydibernardo4320 Жыл бұрын

I prefer Julie Chang as host. Her voice sounds much more professional then the always 'chiper' Zoe. Welcome back Julie!

@whatsapp7461 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching; I'll be responding to your comments verbally on texts. Also have some interesting analysis to share📩📩📩

@richardwilliams9548 Жыл бұрын

personally,I think people should venture Into t rading since the economic meltdown, having one stream of ìncome is not really a good idea

@sanemuller2197 Жыл бұрын

After losing so much to stock market , One best decisions I ever made afterwards was nvesting in financial markets.

@anthonycasper9755 Жыл бұрын

Since I came Across investment platform of Mrs PatienceRubyor my financial life has totally changed.I’m not bothered about the market fluctuations.

@JamesPhilip. Жыл бұрын

H0W can some one reach out to her?!!

@anthonycasper9755 Жыл бұрын

You can reach out to her on telegaram 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

@anthonycasper9755 Жыл бұрын

Patiencerubyor

@Matthew-rp3jf Жыл бұрын

This kind of ai tech will be really cool in video games and probably speed up development, probably already being used a lot

@whatsapp7461 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching; I'll be responding to your comments verbally on texts. Also have some interesting analysis to share📩📩📩

@crownedgambit Жыл бұрын

I’ll use it . I already have different ideas for next project

@adolfolopezmartinez3696 Жыл бұрын

Have a great weekend WSJ... missing Zoe T!

@heavyizthacrown-5842 Жыл бұрын

Zoe sucks! 👎🏾

@whatsapp7461 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching; I'll be responding to your comments verbally on texts. Also have some interesting analysis to share📩📩📩

@darkpassenger65 Жыл бұрын

Can you print these and hang them?

@frankboyer1490 Жыл бұрын

Wow. Barely touched on the real problem surrounding AI ripping off artists and general copyright issues. More media outlets need to talk about this. It's hugely important.

@Andrew-pc8zn Жыл бұрын

WSJ Tech News Briefings are usually pretty surface level so if you have prior knowledge about the topic you might feel cheated

@Sorrowdusk Жыл бұрын

Ahhh so taking a body of a swimsuit model you photographed , the head of an anime girl some other guy drew, and then a background from whoever and *THEN* making it all sorta match before dropping a filter on it. Then some guy selling the composite image on Red Bubble as a t-shirt 👕.

@whatsapp7461 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching; I'll be responding to your comments verbally on texts. Also have some interesting analysis to share📩📩📩

@markcooperartcom Жыл бұрын

@@Sorrowdusk Yeah, that's totally illegal if someone dies the same thing manually.

@Beyondarmonia Жыл бұрын

They have technology and legal experts. They know it's not "ripping off" to learn from copyrighted material ( all human artists do that anyways ) and they no legally it's clear fair use. Other than the fact that there's a bunch of artcels mad on the internet ( which they commented briefly on ), there's nothing else to add.

@asterinycht5438 Жыл бұрын

It is cool if they are not using copyright data for training those models, and have option to opt out copyrighted image from their models

@whatsapp7461 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching; I'll be responding to your comments verbally on texts. Also have some interesting analysis to share📩📩📩

@Beyondarmonia Жыл бұрын

It's fair use. It's always been legal to learn from copyrighted images.

@asterinycht5438 Жыл бұрын

@@Beyondarmonia Fair use with bilion image stolen for training it is pure ilegal, unmoral and unethical. Hell, even artist give credit when using reference on their ref board. legal doesnt mean moral and ethical. Especialy if you using entire copyrighted image from danbooru, artstation and other image repository for artist who spend entire month to perfect their artwork.

@SorminaESar Жыл бұрын

No Zoe Thomas, I am so sad because it sounds it's different

@whatsapp7461 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching; I'll be responding to your comments verbally on texts. Also have some interesting analysis to share📩📩📩

@rkujay Жыл бұрын

Wayta go WSJ. That's some real high tech videos you put out. A photo with dancing figures indicating speech. No one could have ever come up with that. I guess that's why you're so good at tech. There are youtubers with a few hundred followers who respect their fans enough to do passable production.

@henrywindsorrurikovich5203 Жыл бұрын

#art

@whatsapp7461 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching; I'll be responding to your comments verbally on texts. Also have some interesting analysis to share📩📩📩

@CreachterZ 3 ай бұрын

So who labels the billions of inputs that train the AI?

@RozcoDavy Жыл бұрын

This conversation lowkey sounds artificially intelligated... lol I'm gonna question EVERYTHING now 😭

@RozcoDavy Жыл бұрын

What i mean is, Joanna sounds rather authentic, but Julie sounds almost like something between authentic and GPS default voice... I dunno, maybe just me.

@anthonylombardo1261 Жыл бұрын

oh , you mean starting your answer to a question with "so yea" is a questionable way to start an answer? cause it is hella annoying

@anthonylombardo1261 Жыл бұрын

2:54-3:08 thats pretty much the whole video, now the question is, is that statement a huge lie or not?

@MrTinfoilSombrero Жыл бұрын

I am the 'Artist' of my Big Mac because I 'prompted' the drive-through to hold the pickle. So it is with AI art.

@yasminberrytic6157 Жыл бұрын

This is just scary

@whatsapp7461 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching; I'll be responding to your comments verbally on texts. Also have some interesting analysis to share📩📩📩

@anthonylombardo1261 Жыл бұрын

this is just... porn waiting to happen

@heavyizthacrown-5842 Жыл бұрын

Both programs created the same photo of Elon Musk? Btw Julie Chang is better than Zoe Thomas.

@whatsapp7461 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching; I'll be responding to your comments verbally on texts. Also have some interesting analysis to share📩📩📩

@anthonylombardo1261 Жыл бұрын

no, only 1 program did because the other had a "personal public image" restriction, however at 4:35 she mentions both created images of a terrorist attack, but one was far more radical and racist and i wish they showed that.

@heavyizthacrown-5842 Жыл бұрын

DON’T BRING BACK ZOE! 👎🏾

@nitinsharma4121 Жыл бұрын

I am 100% sure whatever words are coming out of her mouth are generated by ChatGpt 😂🤟

@dennisk648 Жыл бұрын

AI: creates astonishing images on demand WSJ: Eww. It is a white man!

@tt6703 Жыл бұрын

so uncreative

@rerikm Жыл бұрын

I though vocal fry was a thing of the past already. It's disgusting Joanna, stop it

@Sorrowdusk Жыл бұрын

Is it a deliberate speech pattern? Is it an accent? Is it just picked up?

@whatsapp7461 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching; I'll be responding to your comments verbally on texts. Also have some interesting analysis to share📩📩📩

@auro1986 Жыл бұрын

they don't make accurate image because people who programmed them are inaccurate

@SergioCMMC Жыл бұрын

AI art is disgusting

@angryponyvulcanm6116 Жыл бұрын

Why?

@Sorrowdusk Жыл бұрын

Some of it is sorta cool. *THEN* you have Loab. Loab is not cool.

@MegaDman16 Жыл бұрын

pretty much.

@n908qd7 Жыл бұрын

@@angryponyvulcanm6116 it’s kind of an insult to artists and has lead to a lot of art theft. Ai tend to take the works of many without permission, which leads to no proper credit. People tend to profit off of others artwork that they didn’t make. Without the credit, the artist whose work was used unfairly, doesn’t get anything in return. It has also led to a lot of greedy behavior. There was one situation where someone took the popular works of someone who passed in the art community, and inserted them into an AI generator. They then had the audacity to ask for credit. The issue? The artwork isn’t theirs. They didn’t make the art, they don’t own it, and are also using the work of someone who had died. They said it was a way to honor them, but it wasn’t pulled off very well. Other situations have had people stealing art and posting it before the real artist, and demanding they credit them, the AI art “creator”. As a whole, it’s not really looked upon as amazing, but it does have good uses if used correctly.

@nathanroberson Жыл бұрын

Your reaction to it proves how powerful it is as art.