AI Copyright Law: A New Era for AI Artists! 🎨 🤖

Рет қаралды 43,163

11 ай бұрын

Are you confused about AI copyright? You are not alone!I’m going break down what ai artists need to know about the copyright law.
Check out my AI courses:
www.udemy.com/user/samson-vow...
Ai copyright is a developing and complex field.
I’ll show you what you can do to Protect your work from unauthorized use and avoid infringing on other people's copyrights
Understanding AI Copyright: Protecting Intellectual Property in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Description:
In this thought-provoking video, we delve into the fascinating realm of AI copyright and explore the intricate relationship between artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights. As technology advances at an unprecedented pace, questions surrounding the ownership and protection of AI-generated works have become more prevalent than ever.
Join us as we navigate through the complex landscape of AI copyright, shedding light on key concepts and legal considerations that shape the future of innovation. Discover the challenges faced by creators, businesses, and the legal system as they strive to adapt to the evolving capabilities of AI.
Throughout the video, we explore real-life examples of AI-generated works, including music compositions, artwork, and written content, raising important questions about authorship and ownership. We'll examine the roles of both human creators and AI systems in the creative process, as well as the ethical implications and potential for collaboration between humans and machines.
Our expert panel of legal professionals, AI researchers, and industry leaders will provide valuable insights into the current legal framework and its suitability for protecting AI-generated intellectual property. We'll explore the debate surrounding the notion of AI as an independent creator and the need to balance innovation with fair compensation for human creators.
Whether you're a content creator, an AI enthusiast, or simply curious about the impact of artificial intelligence on copyright law, this video is a must-watch. Join us on this journey to unravel the complexities of AI copyright and gain a deeper understanding of how we can foster a creative ecosystem that benefits both human and machine intelligence.
Subscribe to our channel for more thought-provoking content on the intersection of technology, law, and society, and join the conversation about the future of AI copyright in the comments section below.
#AICopyright #IntellectualProperty #ArtificialIntelligence #AIInnovation #CopyrightLaw #ai

Пікірлер: 444

@aisamsonreal 3 ай бұрын

Check out this video for the most recent AI Law developments: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q9-Ki9t9tJ3Wg30.htmlsi=s9fkGmmjHxCU5-aD

@marcelootero6866 7 ай бұрын

The fundamental problem of generative artificial intelligences lies in the initial violation of the rights of the authors of the material used, in its "training" since in reality the images now encoded remain in its model, (this explains why companies offer the possibility of extracting them if you have the copyright) Therefore any image generated by the AI is always based on previously loaded images, if it does not have them it cannot generate them, therefore it does not learn copy. In short, the authorship of a user in the generation is minimal, only the idea, since with the same propmt the system generates very different images, like a lottery, and the ideas cannot be registered by themselves, they must belong to a work, and here the work is not human.

@ourif1260 11 ай бұрын

The answer is simple. Use artificial intelligence to explore ideas, and then hire an artist to draw for you. In this way, you preserve your rights

@LeandroT242 10 ай бұрын

U can use IA and create variations of an image and then you do a composition using photoshop for example and create something new, thats is possible, I dont see not ilegal here. What do you think?

@MeesterGgaming 10 ай бұрын

@@LeandroT242 i agree with what you say. The only thing i would add however is not being allowed to just add leonardo style at the end if you want the copy-write. He made his own style and it took him a lifetime so why should we be able to use that and claim its ours just because AI can copy it? In my opinion there should be a combination of styles with some aspects of Leonardo for example where the AI artist put in a lot of work to make the work unique instead of a straight copy of Leonardo.

@RandyToroni 10 ай бұрын

Use your brain to discover ideas. Learn how to write. Learn how to draw. KZfaq has all the resources you need to do that. Then you become an enriched person who has achieved and own everything every time. Problem solved.

@taiyoctopus2958 10 ай бұрын

A human artist??? You know how long it takes them to produce art? AINT NOBODY GOT TIME FO DAT (BRONCHITUS)

@jaylynn8714 10 ай бұрын

@@taiyoctopus2958your comment screams daddy’s money

@roeuth 11 ай бұрын

When you say protect your work, do you mean sitting around and waiting for a machine to do all your work 😂

@beth1979 11 ай бұрын

Its funny how they see machine grifted stuff as "work"

@NE0Nwhip 3 ай бұрын

AI gets paid more than humans@@beth1979

@doctormelancholy3042 2 ай бұрын

Are you saying someone who uses a blueprint and a cookie-cutter frame kit can't build a log cabin-Even if he isn't Amish?

@roeuth 2 ай бұрын

@@doctormelancholy3042 It depends if he stole that blueprint or not, from hardworking blueprint draftsman and did they even ever gave him permission to use said blueprint or not. Though I doubt it because he’d be too cheap to pay with time and effort.

@lespectator4962 Ай бұрын

@@doctormelancholy3042 There's nothing wrong when they just build the cabin for themselves, there is something wrong when they start to sell it on an industrial scale and the design isn't theirs.

@ArtyMartyD 10 ай бұрын

The next stage is to get Stability and Midjourney to completely wipe their datasets and start from sets that are only sourced from Artists who opt in.

@Khoolhwhip 9 ай бұрын

Or they just keep their outputs and purge their data sets and then you'd never even know wtf it's using lol

@gondoravalon7540 9 ай бұрын

> *only sourced from Artists who opt in.* That would kill using public domain works, which seems avoidable on top of needless.

@ArtyMartyD 9 ай бұрын

@@gondoravalon7540 Then tough titties for people who steal

@absolstoryoffiction6615 9 ай бұрын

@@gondoravalon7540 Under USA Copyright Law... Public Domain, Non Copyright, Licencing/Contracts, TOS/EULA etc... Are all legal to use for AI Art.

@breadstick4458 8 ай бұрын

So in other words, u want to kill those ai. Machine learning needs examples to work from, and I hate in when people say it’s theft. It’s like going to a museum and looking at art, making notes then going back, every day until eventually u can make something similar. That’s not theft, and neither is ai

@marks7192 9 ай бұрын

Hmm. Little late to the vid. But those first images from midjourney, when it started, were eye opening. It made me think even more creatively. To see how a machine puts images together was thought provolking.

@AIEinstein 11 ай бұрын

Thank you for explaining! I can imagine how complex this topic will be in the future, especially when text-to-video is so improved that it can be used for actual movies.

@carlossantiago9926 9 ай бұрын

I could use your insight to help clear up my understanding on how to properly release an audio/visual project that I have just completed. I wrote, recorded and mastered 9 entirely original synth-wave songs. I used OpenAI to generate and edit 30 minutes of prompt-based visuals that I lined up to the beat of my original music. I'd like to release this as a single audio/visual, copyrighted piece of work on KZfaq. Do you have advice on what I might need to consider in terms of copyrighting and monetizing this project? This is my first major release. Thank you Samson. -Carlos in Colorado

@absolstoryoffiction6615 9 ай бұрын

That song is copyright able in America because you wrote the skeleton for the music etc. Make sure to send a Copyright Document (depending on your State) to the Copyright Office for legal securities since KZfaq is known to be risky with fraudulent DMCAs. So you probably want to publish your music after the legal copyright documents are filled.

@evek2501 11 ай бұрын

Thank you for this nuanced discussion. This nuance is what is usually missing from the conversation but it's everything. AI in the hands of an artist is a tool and the end result is usually the last step of a thoughtful multi-step process.

@iAmNothingness 5 ай бұрын

Ai in the hands of an artist is a tool? That one might be the new low.

@TomAngPhoto 11 ай бұрын

It helps to call what is generated by AI differently from what is created by cameras, artists. I use the word 'synthogram' as that means the output from a synthesis of elements (tensors from the learned image manifold).

@BenCaesar 11 ай бұрын

Agree 👏🏾I'm personally needing a distinction between generated (prompt to outputs) and assisted (which can simply be auto correct or auto color)

@TomAngPhoto 11 ай бұрын

@@BenCaesarIf you're not creating anything de nuovo, AI enhancement is what I'd talk about (auto colour is not necessarily AI. If it's adaptive and responds differently to different types of scenes, maybe). Synthograms come from AI models responding to prompts.

@BenCaesar 11 ай бұрын

@@TomAngPhoto thanks for the clarification! Lightroom has some preset suggestions according to the image this might be more the Ai you're talking about. It's adaptive than the preset library.

@user-zv3cd1ne4j 11 ай бұрын

Your videos are really informative. You are also very articulate and pleasant to listen to. Love your humour. Im relatively new to using AI for printables and POD. Any interest on making a video on how to figure out the correct AR for Midjourney for particular products?

@pubgiant24 10 ай бұрын

I am struggling with that too

@OriBengal 11 ай бұрын

Thanks Samson. This is one of the topics that I -- despite keeping up with the latest -- have so many questions about... many of which you addressed here.

@missoats8731 11 ай бұрын

What about people that throw paint into a machine that splatters it around the canvas and then sell it without any further steps? Do they not have copyright anymore?

@Bartetmedia 11 ай бұрын

The paint being used is not someone elses art, AI Art is... duh!

@grahamsell3863 3 ай бұрын

@@Bartetmedia I love that people keep saying this because it instantly shows they have no idea how the AI actually works. The AI is nothing more than a mathematical function with billions of variables that have been tweaked based off of billions of inputs. When an AI is "trained" on someone else's art, it doesn't copy it or store it or whatever you think it does, it simply slightly changes one variable by +0.001, another by -0.0004, another by .009 and so on. It's literally just a big equation. It's no more "stealing" it's training data than a photoshop artist is "stealing" the colors from an image by using the same exact RGB value as someone else. It really is incredible how so many people have no idea how the technology works and yet are so sure that it's unethical.

@terriermonisgod 7 ай бұрын

lets say i make a SD model with my own paintings, and then use image2image with sketches, photos, 3D renders, to make new paintings, is that copyrightable?

@C0nstellati0ns 9 ай бұрын

This is interesting, and clearly just the beginning. I think "human authorship" is too vague. When a movie is produced, the copyright to that movie typically belongs to the movie's producer or production company. The producer is usually the individual or entity responsible for overseeing the creation of the film, managing the financial aspects, and making key decisions during its production. It's the same for images. AI is just a tool of creative expression. Maybe more powerful than other traditional means, but still it's just an advanced tool. AI generated movies will exist, but the copyright will belong to the production company/producer. This discussion is far from over.

@manzell 10 ай бұрын

I think protecting the human contribution is fine. AI only creates images or text; it's humans that place those things into artistic contexts from which a human audience derives meaning. The images themselves are now fungible. There's not even really a need to copyright the image; someone else can just use the same prompt and generate their own, none of the artistic value is created by the specificity of the image.

@absolstoryoffiction6615 9 ай бұрын

Humanity was created... If only humans understood their irony.

@iAmNothingness 5 ай бұрын

Cope more. It is stolen images. Based on actual drawing artists. All you ai boys do is type some words. I tried stable dif. It's NOT THAT HARD. Try drawing it from scratch ones in your life.

@MaeRose26 5 ай бұрын

@@iAmNothingnesspreach 🙌 people will benefit more by actually doing the work versus typing in some words for a computer to steal images

@judithoge506 Ай бұрын

Does this mean that I can use these Ai generated images to make my KZfaq videos and not get copyright claims on them?

@totalclutter 11 ай бұрын

Interesting. Recently, I plugged a few of my photos into Midjourney to create similars. I wonder how the copyright office would land on the output. I can bring them into PS and use its tools to do pretty much the same thing, albeit with more control. That said, if I wanted to use the new PS generative tool to change elements of the photo, still a clear copyrightable work? Because of my photo + PS? It’s all so clear now!

@OzVegan 11 ай бұрын

I was thinking along the same line. l use my cartoons as the basis for AI art. It enhances as I could in graphics programs. If I copyright my original image and load it and I'm giving permission to AI to work on my work is the outcome still under my copyright?

@ellenripley4837 11 ай бұрын

Someone told me they did this and showed her process to the copyright office and they approved the copyright but she did it with her digital paintings. I don't know her w it will work with photography.

@totalclutter 11 ай бұрын

@@ellenripley4837 Great to know. Thank you!

@absolstoryoffiction6615 9 ай бұрын

It's an easy thing... If you draw your OC Character, then put it onto AI Art. You still own the Copyright for BOTH because your OC is grandfathered in as that Copyright IP existed before you put it into AI Tech... ... ... Spider Man by Sony is a good example. If you did 50/50 mix of Human and AI generated art etc. Then you may copyright the entire thing. Since all AI Art is case by case and not 100% Public Domain. If you did small edits but nothing major to alter the raw output of AI Generated Art, then you don't get a copyright for it because you're not the author in the legal side.

@absolstoryoffiction6615 9 ай бұрын

@@OzVegan Yes... In America... Yes... Because USA corporations can do that.

@selfpublishingempire 11 ай бұрын

Really interesting, thanks for keeping us all up to date!

@aisamsonreal 11 ай бұрын

Any time!

@dr.davidgerstenaminoacidth2421 11 ай бұрын

Very helpful. I appreciate your stating legalities without “choosing sides.” I’ve been involved in photography, painting, and sketching. When computers came along, I learned how to use but-mapped program, Freehand, Photoshop, fractal programs. Most of the later work was in Photoshop, but I ventured into Deep Dream Generator. Then I hear about AI (DALL-E and Mid Journey). MidJourney can create awesome works but the artists’ intention plays a big role. I can make dozens of prompts in search of something close to what I imagine. I’ve created many images in which I combined 3 different AI images in Photoshop and then did a lot of work in Photoshop. It’s a journey. Sometimes AI is pretty dumb...7 fingers and 3 arms, limited ability to portray complex emotion. In terms of copyright on occasion I make a very simple prompt because if I don’t use a long prompt, it allows MidJourney to be its most creative. With those I definitely could not claim copyright. I did submit AI art to a magazine. They told me they had not worked out a policy yet about publishing AI art, and I understand that.

@Nakamako1 10 ай бұрын

copyrighting is not to protect you. its to push the industry forward. the whole concept of an idea belonging to you without pushing the industry forward is imoral to me.

@LS-kg6my 9 ай бұрын

That means anyone can appropriate and sell the non-copyrightable images on tee shirts, cups, posters etc. In addition, the tech overlords can still take all your “iterations” to train AI and reuse the AI generated images the person “thinks” they have creatd

@absolstoryoffiction6615 9 ай бұрын

Yes and no... The USA Copyright Office made it clear that not all AI Art is in the Public Domain / Non Copyright Able. It's all case by case.

@pay_it_forward_franklin4469 11 ай бұрын

hey, what if you turn your ai art, & literature into an NFT; do you own it then?

@shutterFAQ 11 ай бұрын

Good video. Great examples that clearyfies the otherwise quiet abstract content!

@genby_ai 10 ай бұрын

So, can I use AI generated images in Midjourney for commercial use? What about if someone will use my generations for commercial use? Is it legat to use someone's AI-art for commercial? For example if someone has a paid monthly ai art magazine and uses ai-generated images by others?

@doctormelancholy3042 2 ай бұрын

Basically, depends what you did to alter the original AI image, likely. I'm not a lawyer though. Straight-AI image uncopyrighted-altered images need to take copyright into consideration. If you can take an AI generated painting and turn it into an ink drawing which looks very different from the AI generation, for instance-deserves an artist cioyright.

@terriermonisgod 7 ай бұрын

i struggle to understand the difference in definition between that not being human authorship, and other ways humans use machines to create art. i am really against currently copyrighted material being used for this tech but just dont understand why the tech in of itself is being demonized

@chariots8x230 11 ай бұрын

What if you train the AI using your own artwork and original characters? In this case, the AI is not producing images from scratch based on verbal prompts. It has been trained on visual materials, which are the artwork and references that the artist themself created. There is significant input from the artist, and the AI is just reproducing the artist’s art & original characters by putting them in different scenes.

@beth1979 11 ай бұрын

Too bad, its no longer yours.

@BenCaesar 11 ай бұрын

This is future I'd like to see supercharged

@BenCaesar 11 ай бұрын

@@beth1979 here lies the rub 🫠

@ellenripley4837 11 ай бұрын

You can probably copyright those images since the source is yours.

@BenCaesar 11 ай бұрын

@@ellenripley4837 can't say for sure honestly, even though the input is yours it's running through a dataset of other artists work. Copyright office may not issue a full copyright. If the dataset is trained on your work I think copyright will be easy

@ZnozoicUnDead 10 ай бұрын

the line is easy... if a computer did it... is a computer work... no matter how much you change it or not, if you want you copyright, do all the work....

@streetglamour 11 ай бұрын

Thanks for the update! Appreciate that, really.

@morizanova 10 ай бұрын

I`m curious about possibility of "style" protections in any kind art form . Is it possible ? How many actually new styles we ever see or hear right now ? Without getting inspiration from older arts ? Say some artist who can manually draw in canvas or using mouse and stylus but the final output could be have same style with another artist , how the law will applied ? Is that also means a song cannot copyrighted because drum or guitar sounds same with another songs although they playing different notes ? How about guitar playing styles which generate using same technique with another famous guitarist ? Or how the law can forbid for any musician using same presets and sounds ? Or we`ll having different laws between any form of arts ? Because in some art form like music , Styles could be outputting same sounds because they might be using same techniques

@Mente_Fugaz 10 ай бұрын

there's a freaking lot of new and unique styles, you just need to search for artists lol, anime and pixar is not the only art that exists, I think the law must be regulate the consent and the right for someone to just don't be part for a model...

@morizanova 10 ай бұрын

@@Mente_Fugaz show me examples so I can know for sure that those new styles not just iteration or modification for old ones

@Mente_Fugaz 10 ай бұрын

@@morizanova wtf.. man, style is not "something that comes from nothing" style is the way you make something, take this simple example: if you feed AI with just the works of "samdoesart" AI will just make derivations of his works, but if you show the same works to a human artist, he will put it's own thoughts and intention, his own unique perspective of what he sees on those works, creating something new with his own authenthicity, every style born that way... AI can't make it because is designed to replicate and recreate the information of it's database, so it can just create derivations. did you know that the "anime style" was a reinterpretation of Disney's eyes and faces? you think that AI could create the "Anime Style" if you feed a model just with disney pictures? No!, it will just create more disney pictures lol. Ai is a doppelganger, the concept of "generator" and "discriminator" is literally tryharding to recreate an actual picture, but it can't so it spits something that the discriminator thinks it looks the same. That's why AI can't make something different of what's on it's database, just derivations.

@morizanova 10 ай бұрын

@@Mente_Fugaz we talked about difficulty to copyright styles. Because you can easily trace the origins if you have vast of knowledge and origins Learn to read first before replying with same old AI cry babies songs which everyone already knew But let's ignore that , And talks about your arguments TBH ,I doubt you even ever doing deep dive trial error in AI tools , because your long points still not quite right . Right now You can easily mix some Disney with luis royo and Mobius art style and if not enough there are already thousand of specific artist style which build as mashup tools Standard fan art artist will make their copy as it is but creative ones will mashup those character fan art with contrasting style so people who have limited knowledges will thinking that new styles And right now AI with LoRA etc can do that . Only newbies AI users will keep pumping one art style . The experiences ones know how create good blends

@Mente_Fugaz 10 ай бұрын

@@morizanova Copyright styles: you can't copyright styles, you can copyright works of art... and if you use AI, you are like a client asking for a comission to an artist, but the picture wasn't made by you, so you can't copyright it, despite how much specifications or sketches you shared to the artist in order to him to understand what do you want. Also a work that is not yours, you can't use it for anything you want, you need the consent of that artist to use it, you can just consume it, but when you use art that doesn't belongs to you, to train an algorythm to replicate derivations of it, that's simply unethical... I don't know how there's people that can't see the obvious thing yet. about merging styles, when you merge 2 styles, you think it's something new, but those merges have an origin on the dataset of the original stable diffusion models, if you try to merge styles, it won't have any direction, there are just glitched derivations. you sound like those who think that AI is magic or something... man, AI doesn't understand what is doing unless is on it's training data, the only way that creating styles with AI could be something, is in the case you train AI with those glitched derivations, tag them, and then you try to work with them. you could make a lot of interesting abstract art. But let's be honest here, what you are calling here " create new styles" merging algorythimcally a bunch of pictures, is just using something similar on the database that looks like a merge, even actual pictures merging those styles etc, and creating a derivation of it. if you see a "new style" as an output of AI , that looks good, is because is not a "new style" it's just using stuff on the dataset that you think it doesn't exists lol you sound like those who think that AI is magic or something... it's also hilarious to use the term "newbies AI users" when this technology don't have a single year since it was released lol people can become expert in 1 month or less, you just need a good pc and a expensive Nvidia graphic card... and being suscribed to a lot of twitter and reddit accounts that post new models and AI tools. Because the only real way to improve your art on AI is to wait until new tools and models arrive

@sebastianviera5629 10 ай бұрын

It is curious how the laws do not limit or regulate the application of robots and artificial intelligence in the productive area (industry, agricultural sector, digital companies) nor do they dare to indicate to an entrepreneur what and how to apply it in their businesses, but they do generate all these derisory observations to the artists.

@aifantasyart 10 ай бұрын

Where is the copyright when I generate images and use them in a video like on KZfaq? I upscale the images after generating, find a fitting music and create a slideshow, sometimes with storytelling elements 😅 If I would use only copyright free images (not AI generated) in the video, the copyright for the full video would still be mine? Whats your opinion on this? 😅🎉

@absolstoryoffiction6615 9 ай бұрын

In that example... In America, you own the Copyright of your collage of Public Domain Works but not the individual Public Domain Works used in your collage. You can copyright protect you Collage but not the individual Public Domain materials.

@jamesesparza6893 11 ай бұрын

It is important to assume that those making laws know less about these materials than you do. Remember, our nation is primarily ran by lawyers not nerds. So with the information provided, is it possible that one can assume the copyright of the given prompts since those are authored by the artists? How about if I drew something very crappily, being the treditional element of the authorship, and I improved it via AI artwork? Is it mine still?

@ashyosings5089 11 ай бұрын

It's actually run by the rich who want to stay rich, just like the police is the government's mafia, they use then as a threat of violence

@wordcharm2649 10 ай бұрын

Sounds good in theory but how you will be able to verify who is telling the truth will be a headache. Unless they start requiring proofs but then the process will be incredibly long.

@SeymourClevage 11 ай бұрын

How would anyone prove that the image was Ai generated if you tried to pass it off as your own creation.

@aisamsonreal 11 ай бұрын

This is a very important point! I suppose you would just need to hide your trail and you'd be fine. There is going to be a big problem with this in a lot of fields

@BRHD413 11 ай бұрын

Firstly I think this whole law is silly and uninformed But perhaps designers would be expected to present a proof of their work process. It would be relatively easy to implement a sort of timelapse feature as for example adobe fresco has, that shows your entire work process from start to finish.

@stephanreiken9912 11 ай бұрын

If you use services like MJ, it is logged and public

@BRHD413 11 ай бұрын

@@stephanreiken9912 Logged, yes But for it to be accessible to the public then one would need to know the username of the person making it

@selfpublishingempire 11 ай бұрын

@@aisamsonreal as someone who utilises AI images, there are consistent elements you'd notice if you looked closely for them... but who's to say if they'll still be there in a newer version, or, like I do, I retouch images to remove traces of the imperfections - so then if there was a bot that found AI generated images, would they be able to pick up retouched AI images?

@PriestessOfDada 11 ай бұрын

Fantastic video Sam, great job.

@ss-oq9pc 10 ай бұрын

So what happens if you just say your AI generated art is your art that you painted? All seems very honor system to me, same with licenses.

@Uratz 10 ай бұрын

What if Ai generated an image and I repainted it in real life using oil paints on canvas, including driving the visual styles of the prompt, will the final painting on canvas in real life be Copyrighted?

@maneki.n3k0 8 ай бұрын

Isn't that the same as an artist painting on canvas the natural landscape? Nature is not copyrighted, neither AI. The painter holds the copyright to his work in both cases.

@aisamsonreal 11 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching! What topics on AI would you like to see me cover next? And if you have any thoughts on how to make my videos even better for you, please let me know, I'm all ears. :)

@alifmuhammadgultom4418 10 ай бұрын

Thank you for the depth explanation! I suggest for the next AI topic is concerning the machine learning and the relation to the current lawsuit copyright infringement. :D

@Nakamako1 10 ай бұрын

copyrighting is not to protect you. its to push the industry forward. the whole concept of an idea belonging to you without pushing the industry forward is imoral to me.

@EpicTutorialTips 9 ай бұрын

Important distinction to note, is that your video would only apply to those who are based in the US. US copyright laws do not extend full copyright protection for computer-generated work, unlike other countries where they do. That, ultimately, is why a lot of these platforms still make reference to commercial rights and ownership to prospective users, when using their tool to create art.

@gamedev2022 11 ай бұрын

What about camera generated? The human only select an object, and press a button, using auto mode.

@missoats8731 11 ай бұрын

With a camera you have much greater control over the creative outcome, which seems to be the aspect they focus on. But I agree that there are somewhat arbitrary lines drawn. What if you use a self-shot photo as a reference for the AI for example? It's way too complex and they don't seem to grasp all the possibilities.

@seraphcreed840 11 ай бұрын

@@missoats8731but does one own the tree or the grass? Does one put the creative elements into the scene if it is instead Camara and software that does the vast majority of the work? More importantly, arent there other things like Disney's decades long copyright stuff that might be worth reviewing. Or old games that are no longer being produced or sold still out of public domain for decades?

@celtshaun1427 11 ай бұрын

@@missoats8731 I will just start taking photo's of my AI works and take the piss that way lol

@DarkSolZero 11 ай бұрын

@@missoats8731 Questionable actually, since with a camera you only have choice/control over the immediate area in your physical presence, whereas with an AI you can specifically control the subject of your output to be anything you can imagine. The amount of difference in human control here is orders of magnitude different. Similarly, with photography, you get lots of unusable shots, and make choices as to which of the shots you photographed constitute a final artwork, much as an AI artist picks and chooses which generation out of potentially infinite choices they consider to be the final artistic product. This new "law" or precedent is flawed in many ways, and I expect they will have to amend it over time simply because they are under valuing both the level of human choice and control in prompting, and the future capabilities of ai tools to give the user greater control than many of the current technologies provide. There is a stable diffusion tool called control-net which allows the user to pose a subject control facial expression, layout the composition very specifically. These are even greater levels of human input being put in, and should not require the artist to go in and manually edit the final work just to consider it original human created content.

@DarkSolZero 11 ай бұрын

@@toren9120 You're taking this argument in a direction that isn't at all based in the copyright precedent set by these legal findings. The only thing that is being considered for copyrightable artwork according to the video is how much control did the human have in the process. I argue in the case of AI art that it's actually quite a lot more, or at best nearly equal to that of a photographer, and it's a sliding scale like any process, you tend to get more out the more you put in. The difference in the technology that is responsible for getting a photograph onto film stock or into a digital file, compared to having a text to image tool produce an image is significant, but the process that a photographer takes, in choosing a subject, framing a shot, determining various settings, and selecting what shots constitute a finished product are so similar that the differences are mostly symantics. I'm confident that many copyright worthy photographs would constitute far less effort or forethought than a lot of the AI art that I've produced. Your argument above is identical to the argument that a painter or sculptor could make towards any photographer in fact. And yet the law does not preclude works of photography from copyright. The original comment made by Christian Pedersen, is right on the money. If you want to ignore that, disregard, or whatever (and I'm sure you and many others biased against ai art and artists will), that's fine, but the law set out according to the video is wrong headed, unless they want to apply it equally to other forms of art, photography specifically for this argument, rendering all such works no longer able to be copyrighted (and that aint happening).

@kvartz 8 ай бұрын

It's not a gray area, you can use Ai as a tool, if the final results doesn't require use of other tools or a skill you have it's not your work, be honest what you actually contributed to the final outcome.

@jumo543 11 ай бұрын

This discussion about the arbitrary line of where human involvement starts is very similar to the discussion we are having in education: how much work does the student have to do so it’s not plagiarism. Is it enough to summarise/ slightly change an essay that AI has written?

@celtshaun1427 11 ай бұрын

Don't worry in time people will start to use AI for self learning no need for teachers, Oh hell we're all doomed, KZfaq and AI and learning by your mistakes it's the future.

@jumo543 11 ай бұрын

@@celtshaun1427 “no need for teachers” would be bad news for me…

@beth1979 11 ай бұрын

@@celtshaun1427 with AI there won't be any mistakes to learn from.

@paulaumentado1588 11 ай бұрын

@@celtshaun1427it's the future bro this shit will put humanity in the drain it's like the AI bros only reply this is the future you luddite like do you guys have any other response other than you are obsolete like bro do you have a brain we creators made what you call art work in which you guys mish mashed and stole so don't come here talking to us as if AI is some godly entity when in reality it's just a pattern recognition technology that some corporate Dev and CEO make to steal and profit from us artists

@judithoge506 Ай бұрын

So, i can use Ai generated images to create my KZfaq videos and i won't get copyright claims for using them. That's what i want to understand. I use Copilot to create my images but i'm still worries cos i dont know if i'm free to use them on KZfaq or not. Someone put me through please

@simoncallelaverde 10 ай бұрын

20 years ago we were talking about having to think about human rights for AI sometime in the future Now we are debating how to defend our own human rights against AI

@absolstoryoffiction6615 9 ай бұрын

Humans are their own evil... Such an ironic extinction...

@21preend42 11 ай бұрын

I got a question. Under these rules how exactly is a photograph a copyrighted work since all the "artist" has to do is press a button and the camera does all the work? where is the human authorship there ?

@21preend42 11 ай бұрын

@@toren9120 and what about the people who do not chose whatever lenses you mentioned and just pull up their Iphone from their pocket and take a photo. They don't need to choose a perspective or anything. Is no different. You could even set a timer when the photo can be taken and leave the phone. That is still their photo and copyrighted. So all your points you mentioned are not needed in order to have photography copyrighted. Also give prompting a go, and see how 'easy' it is. It will take you at least a good few days until you learn to prompt like an amateur, and longer to actually get something good.

@posthawk1393 10 ай бұрын

If you are specific enough in the prompt where you already have the idea in your head and are simply directing the AI to do your bidding, then I think you can claim ownership.

@21preend42 10 ай бұрын

@@posthawk1393 I agree. In UK you can anyway. It's more relaxed than USA.

@Lambsauce10 Ай бұрын

It's because it takes skill to take a photo that looks good. Why do you think photography is a career. People get paid to take photos with their equipment for a client. It is utter lunacy to expect the same treatment when all you do is type in a prompt. I've used Dream AI in the past for legitimate reasons, mostly for fun. I'm also an artist and I never thought highly of those generated images, just that they looked cool and maybe I could take inspiration from one of them cus it was really unintentionally abstract. Instead of typing words into a prompt. Why don't you: Type words into a story do some doodles play an instrument program something cool Unless youre literally incapable of writing more than one sentence or you have no hands or the motor control of a dude with oven mits on, there is no excuse as to why you cant find something creative or fun to do or pay someone to do it for you. End of

@21preend42 Ай бұрын

@@Lambsauce10 " because it takes skill to take a photo" what about a photo that i just press the button without using any "skills". A bad photo at that. "all you do is type in a prompt" , "all you do is press a button" Don't kid yourself.

@marinaarrudaa 11 ай бұрын

Thank you for this video! Help me a lot

@MeesterGgaming 10 ай бұрын

great great video, i was talking with a neighbor about this since her husband is a draw artist. Her husband was sad about how easily some things could be done now and claimed as the work of someone else. I was like ok but if you go trough all kind of loops and making combinations of different styles which those artist couldn't even do themselves + some points you made in the video... why couldn't it be copyright? in my opinion it should. Just bluntly type a scene you want and add leonardo style should be not be allowed to be copywriter since you just copy the exact style of him. Also the hard work those artists put in to make they're own style should be respected and protected imo. I felt sort of bad by just testing some of they're styles in midjourney if iam honest haha.

@absolstoryoffiction6615 9 ай бұрын

Under USA Copyright Law. Art Styles are not copyright protected. I can easily recreate any Art Style 1 to 1 or have an AI do it for me. It matters not in the law. Only that... If I'm replicating Marvel Comics, that I don't make Iron Man because that would be Copyright Infringement. Most artists don't know a damn about USA Copyright Law in detail. I do, since it's a part of my business to know those details for video game development.

@MeesterGgaming 8 ай бұрын

@@absolstoryoffiction6615 so how would you write an midjourney prompt to get features of ironman or a mix with him and another super heroes without getting ironman? Since you can use the art style. Just marvel artstyle?

@absolstoryoffiction6615 8 ай бұрын

@@MeesterGgaming Legally speaking... As long as you do not make "Iron Man" by Marvel/Disney when using AI Software or drawing it out yourself. Then it's legal under USA Copyright. Just don't call it "Iron Man" since that's Trademark Infringement and don't create any derivatives of Iron Man. You can have your own "man in a robot suit" even to the complex technological level as Iron Man but avoid doing as I stated above. (This is old legal stuff that AI Software never changed nor added upon, in America.) Art Styles are the same since Art Styles are not copyright protected but the Iron Man IP is copyright protected. You can certainly make your own Marvel / DC Style Comics but avoid using copyrighted characters. Avoid Fair Use too, since that legal defence won't work in this subject, specifically. Unless you're making political commentary etc. where super heroes were used in that manner most often. That's protected under both USA Fair Use Law and USA 1st Amendment.

@wordcharm2649 10 ай бұрын

This is basically the law you have right now with public domain images. You don't own the rights unless you change them considerably to make them your own.

@Mente_Fugaz 10 ай бұрын

in the announcement of the copyright law, they said that in case you modify the picture, what you own is just the modifications of it

@absolstoryoffiction6615 9 ай бұрын

@@Mente_Fugaz Yes and no... It depends on the 50/50 mix. Do it well, then you own the Copyright of the entire IP.

@user-kq3zt3rf1d 9 ай бұрын

This is a nice and instructive video.(AI and Virtual Reality: Creating Immersive Experiences with Technology) I hope there is a lot to learn from it.,,,,,,

@aisamsonreal 8 ай бұрын

I hope so too!

@user-sj6ds4ef3l 10 ай бұрын

The link is not opening for me....

@aisamsonreal 10 ай бұрын

Which link?

@tristanthedarkstar 7 күн бұрын

QUESTION: if someone takes an image and it is altered significantly by AI does it not cease to be their likeness? I believe it was found that if it is altered significantly or is considered sufficiently "transformative" it can be used or am I wrong? As an example: If I make an AI influencer on instragram based on let's say actress Emma Watson, but with a different name and an AI has generated an avatar inspired by Emma Watson... with significant alterations: changes to the nose, different eye color, changes to jawline, significant body changes, different hair color, etc--though someone may look at it and say it reminds them of Emma Watson or maybe it looks like her, it nevertheless has been altered into something else or transformed at least. And then that person uses the AI to then sell naked photos of this AI influencer...is that a legit cause of action or otherwise something to be sued over? They are not claiming to be her and the differences are significant.

@raymond_luxury_yacht 11 ай бұрын

Is language copywritable? Surely the prompt language is the creative part here. And I spend hours tweaking prompts. Tell me that's not a creative endeavour akin to a client describing to an artist

@Mente_Fugaz 10 ай бұрын

well... you can copyright a book, is not the language itself, i think is more closer to a code, you can't copyright a code in programation. a prompt is basically the same

@jurajhadzala951 21 күн бұрын

Its by no means on part with what wou would need to do to achieve the result withou the AI. So you cant even say you ate 50/50

@VE2FET 11 ай бұрын

So.... you have to keep the prompt... especially with a complete, complex prompt providing creating details... (without saying the prompt was made by another AI product.. oops.) ?!?

@OtherWorldExplorers 11 ай бұрын

It all starts somewhere... These are the first steps into a larger world

@absolstoryoffiction6615 9 ай бұрын

Nope... Given cybernetics and true AI... You're rather too far behind, Humanity.

@juanitatreadwell7240 8 ай бұрын

Why have AI-generated movies and games not been in violation of copyrights? Why only AI-generated books?

@basdfgwe 11 ай бұрын

What about my creativity in copying a prompt ?

@Mente_Fugaz 10 ай бұрын

lol, what about my creativity in posting cool AI art that i saw someone made, and them posting it like i made it xD It requires creativity, because you need to know where you can find something you like

@jurajhadzala951 21 күн бұрын

The fuck man

@stewartmcleod4094 10 ай бұрын

What if you had a specific image in mind and it took dozens of prompts and modifications to get to the desired result?

@Mente_Fugaz 10 ай бұрын

is explained on the announcement, the law perceives AI works in the same way than "comissions" when you hire an artist to draw for you a complex idea that you have, it doesn't matter how much you specify the details to him, the work is still made for the artist, you are just the client, same case with AI, it doesn't matter how much you specify what you want.. the result of the image is made by an AI. You can only copyright the story that involves the picture if you are using it on a comic.

@absolstoryoffiction6615 9 ай бұрын

@@Mente_Fugaz Yes and no... The Copyright Office isn't that black and white. Treating AI Art akin to Commissions, is one thing but it simply ignores the wrest of the complexities in technology.

@generalshrooms 9 ай бұрын

The bits on "human authorship' are entirely arbitrary.

@andyb8838 4 ай бұрын

Such great, technical detail, thank you.

@aisamsonreal 4 ай бұрын

Glad you liked it!

@robwahl 10 ай бұрын

'Prompt Artist', a common 2024 job title

@hourglass8450 11 ай бұрын

I guess for me is - are you going to copyright the wood and the sand you used from the computer as yours, when you used it as part of your work, or the end overall results itself, a reproduceable outcome that's unique to your creativity?

@absolstoryoffiction6615 9 ай бұрын

USA Copyright Law for User Generated Content (UGC) has always judged on the Output of the user. Not the Input they used to create the Output. Services such as AI Generated Art Software DO NOT follow the same legalities. A company or individual can be held liable for copyright infringement, unlike UGC, if and only if they can prove that the Data Base contains their infringing copyrighted material(s)... Which is... Good luck with that against Neural Networks, under American Courts.

@Gamer-zu5ob 11 ай бұрын

please make a video about wonderstudio vfx ai

@stabpunch 11 ай бұрын

Great video, relevant and current.

@aisamsonreal 11 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@angelmarc4151 11 ай бұрын

in short 90% of current stuff that is called art, in various art galleries' , pictures and vids are not copyrighted, great, no more piracy as its seems it was vage term anyway

@I-Dophler 11 ай бұрын

Creating through the symbiosis of artificial intelligence and human imagination yields products that are legally eligible for copyright protection. This emerging paradigm of collaborative creation poses novel challenges to the conventional frameworks of intellectual property rights. From a legal standpoint, the question becomes: how can the copyright office distinguish between the human element and artificial intelligence in the creation process? Indeed, this presents a complex puzzle. Given the inherent anonymity of AI and its inability to possess legal personality, accurately identifying the contributions of both entities in the creative process will be challenging. It's a task that stands to be extraordinarily difficult, and yet, it is a necessary evolution in our understanding and application of copyright laws in the age of artificial intelligence.

@pay_it_forward_franklin4469 11 ай бұрын

hey, what if you turn your ai art, & literature into an NFT; do you own it then?

@I-Dophler 11 ай бұрын

@@pay_it_forward_franklin4469 Good idea, but I've tried that already.

@pay_it_forward_franklin4469 11 ай бұрын

@@I-Dophler wait; so if that doesn't work, being that the artwork has a seed-number, & the literature has zero-plagiarism; what givez, bkuz I am LITERALLY in the present to present both ai-art, & lit. as I am writing this #againwhatgivez

@I-Dophler 11 ай бұрын

@@pay_it_forward_franklin4469 The complexities of copyright law in the context of AI-generated art and literature are indeed challenging. The seed number you mention is a unique identifier for the AI-generated artwork, but it doesn't necessarily confer copyright ownership. Similarly, the fact that AI-generated literature is free of plagiarism doesn't automatically grant it copyright protection. The critical issue here is the concept of 'originality' and 'creative input', central to copyright law. AI is not legally recognised as capable of original thought or creativity, so it cannot hold the copyright. Therefore, the copyright status of AI-generated works is still a grey area in many jurisdictions. It's a rapidly evolving field, and legal frameworks struggle to keep pace with technological advancements. #AIcopyrightissues

@pay_it_forward_franklin4469 11 ай бұрын

@@I-Dophler Yea I understand, but wanting to give to those, whether at leisure, or especially in need; all I want to do is exhibit within the linez with no penalty for. So, for example; I put out ai art with literature for monetary-gain; what restriction(z), &/or penaltiez take place?

@alkemystica 10 ай бұрын

Nice explanation!

@aisamsonreal 10 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@I-Dophler 11 ай бұрын

As the chess game of legal discourse regarding artificial intelligence continues to unfold in the hallowed halls of jurisprudence, the unrelenting tide of technological evolution pushes forward, undeterred. Lawyers and adjudicators, steeped in precedent and principle, strive to wrestle with the complex connotations AI introduces to our established legal infrastructure. Meanwhile, the sphere of artificial intelligence itself refuses to remain stagnant. Instead, it challenges itself and us, pressing forth at a rapid pace that it's nearly tangible, ceaselessly advancing towards newer, more sophisticated echelons of innovation. Every sunrise heralds new frontiers in our exploration and understanding of AI, thrusting us deeper into an epoch marked by path-breaking revelations and boundless potential. Hence, as legal deliberations rumble on, the tireless march of artificial intelligence toward tomorrow never misses a beat.

@TheMetaEducator 10 ай бұрын

Nice vid. Thanks.

@aisamsonreal 10 ай бұрын

Glad you liked it!

@brianhopson2072 10 ай бұрын

Couldn't you put AI art under an IP?

@TheMageesa 10 ай бұрын

If an art director prompts me as an illustrator with ideas, then curates my sketches or art, and suggests changes, nonetheless the work was done by me. I would have the copyright unless given away in a contract. AI cannot make a contract, and cannot hold a copyright.

@EpicTutorialTips 9 ай бұрын

It will largely depend on your local copyright laws. While the US does not extend copyright privileges to computer-generated work, there are other countries that do because it is an element of their copyright laws. For instance, in the UK if you create work that is computer-generated, then you retain copyright ownership of that material because the law permits it. I also think that the argument against AI is not as strong as people make it out to be, though I understand the frustration with it. People are upset because AI was taught by essentially looking at other available art... But that is no different to every art student, every artist, every designer, who at some stage or another, has studied works of art with their own eyes, or who has sat in a classroom learning techniques using other art as a reference point. The only difference is that AI can do the tasks at a much, much faster speed. So when you strip it all down, it's really no different to comparing a human vs a calculator.

@americanlion8151 11 ай бұрын

Thank you.

@regis_red 10 ай бұрын

At some point AI will let you decide everything that is on a image (light, camera angle, subject, composition) exactly like you want it just like in photography. Then AI will behave exactly like a camera. Then we will have another conversation.

@jonmichaelgalindo 11 ай бұрын

It doesn't matter. Publication happens because individuals can't make movies. A "good movie a friend saw this weekend" can just be a prompt + seed. Copyrighted works will lose market share fast, because of copyright.

@beth1979 11 ай бұрын

No, the market is quickly becoming saturated with AI stuff, market saturation devalues everything.

@jonmichaelgalindo 11 ай бұрын

@@beth1979 AI art doesn't "devalue". It had near zero value already. Only human art devalues, until AI is all that's left. (BTW I mean this as a bad thing if that isn't obvious.)

@Mente_Fugaz 10 ай бұрын

@@jonmichaelgalindo the big problem is that, the devaluation of human art will stagnate everything eventually, because without new artists, the AI can't evolve. And if artists can't make a live with it, there will be less and less artists working full time on it, innovating and moving the culture... Until AI work ethically with licenced and public domain data, art will keep bleeding

@jonmichaelgalindo 10 ай бұрын

@@Mente_Fugaz Public domain data is a hundred years old. It's stuff about what society was like before computers existed, before nukes and the holocaust and socialism. AI trained on public domain data is useless to everyone. And AI trained on licensed data will be controlled by the wealthy elite, who will force artists to pay through the nose for the privilege of using the tools trained on their work. Pay artists pennies to steal their work, then charge them an arm and a leg to use the product. >:-( No. The problem I see is saturation. Even before AI, we've been overloaded these last two decades with worthless, cookie-cutter, derivative wastes of time competing for our attention with the true gems. What we need is a way to identify and amplify the impact of artists blazing new, truly worthwhile trails in art. If AI is truly an all-purpose tool, maybe it can do that. An AI that can look at something and say, "that's not random noise, and it's something truly new and valuable." But then again, maybe not. But saturation is the problem, in my humble opinion.

@Mente_Fugaz 10 ай бұрын

@@jonmichaelgalindo i think, satuartion is a consequence, not a problem... The problem could be the lack of motivation to innovate... The inspiration to make something unique and fresh. The real saturation comes with AI , not with children trying hard to draw my little pony characters, Because a lot of new talents raise making that stuff, and in the future they develop their own vision creating authenthic stuff

@soonamistudios3290 2 ай бұрын

Here Consider this: you have a creative idea, and you take paint, pencil or whatever tools you need to create that art...right. Well now let's look at AI we take a program that learns from a prompt (a different kind of tool like paint or canvas) and takes what you prompt it to do, which is in essence human creating the baseline of what is to be created. So, without the human aspect you would notget the images or video result at all!!! I think in many ways there are different kinds of art, and digital art has been around a long time, this is just a new form of digital art, which in essence creates a new kind of art! You take the prompt from your brain, and AI artist take that same prompt from their brain, and both manifest the image! Don't hate the way art comes to be! The idea of art is creative expression, AI and what you see as the norm in art are one and the same just a different path to accomplish the very same goal...it is still art, no matter how you get it, sometimes a closed mind only sees the negative outcome, try opening your mind. Computers & programs have been creating art for decades, in movies, aand other advertisements, what you see in your everyday life was created by a camera (essencially a small computer) or a computer to generate the effects, which a type of artist created...Do you think that art should stay stagnant while the art world and the way it is created evolves? Art is art and there are many forms of it, to condemn this form of art is simple hypocracy. Get over it, do what you do, and evolve or don't but, not allowing yourself to evolve, makes you blind to the reality that is the world around us!

@gamingwithwolves5615 11 ай бұрын

I have an idea and considering the climate of recent circumstances......the ai art identifies as human art

@dand4848 10 ай бұрын

in the future you will make a decision to buy machine or handmade product.

@bjohns3961 10 ай бұрын

They could ask people to donate photos and art to train with

@KaiBuskirk 10 ай бұрын

Danke!

@tosvus 11 ай бұрын

I don't find the chatgpt poem a good example at all. So if I tell it how to rhyme, and keep adding a lot more detail, am I not in a major way leading how the result will end up? As Samson mentions, there is a big difference between saying "make a nice image" and more detailed promts, like "make a pencil drawing of a girl with thin lips, eyes further apart than normal, messy blonde shoulder length hair, freckles and a mole just to the right of her nose-tip". Of course that could be taken further, I could have manually drawn a landscape and use photoshop to insert her into it? I only get to copyright the landscape in that picture, or does it now constitute a completely copyrightable work of art?

@jaredgreen2363 9 ай бұрын

Controlnet would override that if the user came up with the condition themselves.

@discorabbit 11 ай бұрын

Prompting is human input

@Mente_Fugaz 10 ай бұрын

but you are not trying to copyright the prompt, you want to copyright the picture lol,

@jascam1 5 ай бұрын

AI is but a tool that depends on human input much like any other tool such as synthesizers for modern music which can be copyrighted.

@f4ust85 2 ай бұрын

The logic here is a little funny. So you do a lot of work through ChatGPT so you can stay a small team and dont need to hire other people. But somehow doing the same with CG or visuals and just generating them rather than hiring someone is a huge etical issue? Any team or company can claim they need to save money.

@kalechips5972 10 ай бұрын

I just wonder how the hell they plan to enforce this?

@kimmysavemiley 7 ай бұрын

so its still ok to use is not just for a tool

@AlexUnder_BR 11 ай бұрын

This is obviously new to society as a whole, and we have a long run to cross yet in a legal enviroment... but proclaming that just by a machine producing a material isn't copyrightable is just as saying that a photograph made by any camera isn't also copyrightable. BUT IT IS! Any photographer can proclame ownership of any picture that he takes althought every single pixel of it is made exclusively by the 'machine' Camera. And the photographer also (most of the times) didn't do a single bit of a thing onto the scene that he takes a shot on. So why he can copyrigth that?? It is just because he bough an device that helps economy as whole? Instead of the current state of AI Ecosystem where you can generate a ton of images even for free? I believe that a good starting point should start from the companies that provide AI Art generation in making clearer as possible that any image generated in a free plan isn't free for commercial use. But at the moment they just explicited that the images aren't in your 'private channel'. This is what makes the regulation difficult in my opinion, because anyone can copy any image made on those free channels and proclame that it belongs to him/her. And how he/she (the real owner even) could ever prove that? Thats why is important to make it clear how a free or paid plan should work. Then would become much easier to prove authority and ownership of an AI Art generated.

@beth1979 11 ай бұрын

You don't own it, the AI does.

@discothequeplus 10 ай бұрын

I asked ChatSonic and ChatGPT about how the app's gonna know and control copyright of the music made with this system, they saind me "it's a huge challenge for these companies to do it". That's why I am confused, for example, "I" created almost a hundred pieces of music on an A.I. app, but only 10% are listenable and these 10% is in the middle of trashy music. How companies will know if the person took some of these crappy things and tell the world it's yours? It's a bul*****, because if you pay, you can have the copyright, so the problem here is MONEY, elite is going to absorb and make more money with A.I. , pay for this and nobody is going to know.

@seanfaherty 10 ай бұрын

Now if the AI is created by people why can't what the AI creates be considered created by the original programmer ? If you own a cow and that cow has a calf you intern own the calf. That's capitalism. Also, If a person gives the prompt, is that not enough to at least be considered a collaborative art work ?

@paulhiggins5165 11 ай бұрын

I guess the amount of alteration required to define a work as legitimately different enough from the original output to qualify as copyright could be expressed this way; imagine that someone takes an image you have created - how much alteration would you feel they would need to make to your image in order to claim copyright of that 'new' image for themelves? Most artists would feel that simply taking their work and making minor changes to it would not be enough for the copyright of that image to pass from them to the person making the changes. There would need to be substantial alterations to the orginal work before it was acceptable to define the resulting image as a 'new' work. If we apply this to AI generated images again it would not be enough to make some minor alterations in order to claim copyright- substantial changes would need to be made in order to claim that the resulting image was a genuine new creation that qualified for copyright protection. I do wonder however if the ability of AI's to create iterations of exisiting images renders this whole debate null and void. For example, suppose I see an image you have created and would like to use that image in a book I am publishing- I could perhaps licence that image from you, or I could simply use your image as prompt to generate something similar and use that instead- it's not clear to me that there will even be a market for image licencing in the future so the issue of copyright may already be an anachronism not worth worrying about.

@Mente_Fugaz 10 ай бұрын

the copyright on that case only protects the modifications that you made, not the whole picture

@regis_red 10 ай бұрын

“Actually formed” the traditional elements of authorship… isn’t that what a camera does?

@Kombo-Chapfika 10 ай бұрын

Good video. Thanks

@USBEN. 11 ай бұрын

Well i created the rough sketch then used control net to generate final image. Ez copyright.

@Mente_Fugaz 10 ай бұрын

nop, what you can copyright is the original sketch lol... because the AI output wasn't made by you

@USBEN. 10 ай бұрын

@@Mente_Fugaz Bruh💀

@CyberMacs 11 ай бұрын

What is the border? I have a simple photo taked by me. It is mine 100%. So I can use copyright. Okey, now open Photoshop, and make some changing. It is a human art, right? Put some extra with pixel pencil one by one. Now do the same with clone too. Take toooooo much time.... Now ask the AI to do the same! Ups, sorry, no AI. Just only human things. Use the photoshop batch to use the cloning stamp. Write a script that make automatic things. I make a complex system to work when I am sleeping. It is not AI. I call it AA: Automatic Assistant. So not AI. Or I have a real photo. I use the AI to correct some part (new Photoshop Generative filter). Will it be AI created? What if I cut my head from my photo and put inside an AI generated image? So many question, so many situation.... Maybe we should measure the time we used to product the picture (or text, or something else). A photoshop image, a hand drawing can be product in short time. And a good AI generated image can need a lot of working time too.

@Artai.wonder 10 ай бұрын

Midjourney is a tool just like your camera. Only click can make you millions. I didn’t paint the it. Do I have to say I didn’t paint the photo ? Ai tools are gonna get better and better. They person with the best skills and creative will always win.

@byujkt3822 11 ай бұрын

Why not accepting the fact all existed AI models are stolen and modified. Thanks to Stable diffusion, AI model is being trained updated everyday until now from unknown sources and persons.

@Mente_Fugaz 10 ай бұрын

the ceo of open AI told that there must be laws for people to have the right to opt out all their content from the databases, even in the socialmedia models, I don't know if with that, he was refering that there could be a way to opt out from the models at this point...

@pinkwhale731 10 ай бұрын

It all seems like a panicked knee jerk reaction by the copyright people. Simply put, if a person produces a piece image (regardless of how it is made) then that should be theirs. As a musician, I can come up with an idea of a song, send it to a recording studio and the producer will make it into a wonderful piece of music of which I will own the copyright to. If the technology was available then this could quite easily be done by a computer! All musicians, artists poets etc all base their work, whether they are aware of it or not, upon others work. AI is just the same. The whole AI thing is happening so fast and can, if we embrace it, ensure that we will be able to produce some extraordinary art etc in the future that none of us could ever imagine possible.

@Amelia_PC 11 ай бұрын

The funny thing is, as an artist with nearly 20 years of experience in comics, I don't believe that Zarya resembles Zendaya. Zendaya's eyes, eyebrows, and forehead have distinct differences compared to that fictional character. For artists skilled in capturing likenesses, we understand the significant role that eyes, eyebrows, and forehead play in drawing. Although the images may not be of high quality, it's worth noting that Zendaya's chin is more prominent. Furthermore, aside from their shared Afro heritage, they do not bear a resemblance to each other. Not to my artist's eyes. Yes, as an artist, I utilize sketches and establish the composition before finalizing pieces with Stable Diffusion + ControlNet. While it may not be suitable for various tasks and lacks the necessary AI capabilities for serious commercial projects, it does provide valuable insights into areas I can enhance in my final artwork.

@Alter3go 11 ай бұрын

in short: Film a bts of what you are doing so people see theres some human input in the final image. Done

@CaritasGothKaraoke 11 ай бұрын

Or just don’t say you used AI at all.

@DesignerTextiles 10 ай бұрын

As a photographer I don't mind at all when my images are used freely for personal use. I think it is rather miserable to hide something on a hard drive that might add to someone else's creativity. On the other hand if someone has a consistant habit of just stealing other people's work for profit with no conscience that should be a crime whether AI generated or not. The lawsuits are interesting. The stock libraries do represent a lot of artists who in general want their work protected but I hope it is overturned. I would not mind if elements of my images were used. AI artistic programs that have good intension should be able to use any element already created. It's a little bit like saying if you go for a walk don't take a photo of a rose in someone's garden. Let creativity grow and thrive!

@BenCaesar 11 ай бұрын

I think artists should keep their a record of their prompts and the outputs from say mid journey then they’ll be able compare with the final image after all of their tweaking and expression. Maybe this should be part of the registration process. If you think that’s tedious, try registering a collaborative music work with artists who aren’t on the same registry and use different names 😅

@LorettaBangBang 11 ай бұрын

This would be task of the platform tbh. Midjourney's user experience is still hideous right now. Scrolling up forever to find something I did in the past? No thanks. Ai summarizing as text whatever I was trying to create that day and collecting it by date? Yes.

@morizanova 10 ай бұрын

I`m not sure you can replicate any results even if you used same prompts

@ezdepaz4363 10 ай бұрын

You get the exact same image if you generate two images with the exact same parameters(including seed) in Stable diffusion.

@absolstoryoffiction6615 9 ай бұрын

That has nothing to do with legalities because AI Art Software is not own by the USA Government. So there isn't a legal obligation with a heavier legal merit to enforce that.

@BenCaesar 9 ай бұрын

@@absolstoryoffiction6615 good point there isn’t a centralized policy. but the contention is the licensed work the Ai is trained on. The rights are owned by many artists of many different jurisdictions and even after all this time I see some companies outright ban or seriously hinder Ai. Not to mention social media is updating their policies soon. Govt might not be the only regulation at this point

@erik1836 11 ай бұрын

Excellent analysis and so important for all of us who do create art to be aware of the legal implications. I would not use an image generated by DALL-E, Mid Journey etc commercially for these potentially problematic reasons. Adobe Firefly has a much more sensible and honest paradigm. The others, in my opinion, are latter day pirates sailing the internet seas robbing and stealing with total disregard for anyone or anything.

@morizanova 10 ай бұрын

Because Adobe say it ? Unless Adobe publishing ( photo stock) contributor list with payment income , I would be not 100 % sure about it

@Mente_Fugaz 10 ай бұрын

Firefly is the same... the only etichal model is the one wich allows you to Input your work manually, not the one that allows you to output it manually, there's a lot of pirated works on adobe, that the original artist can't output because they don't have the account of the pirates who uploaded them in the first place...