Wow, now you do sociopath conferences?

"well if i'm taking your blood right now, maybe you shouldn't have blood in the first place" Said the flea to the dog

What a revolting thing to say. Your whole invention develops itself by copying creatives life's works. Now you're saying those creatives shouldn't have existed in the first place?

Generative AI wouldn't exist without creatives' work, yet she has the gall to say that maybe some of these creative jobs should not have existed in the first place. This is the height of entitlement.

Maybe her job shouldn't exist either since I can ask ChatGPT to spout nonsensical drivel.

AI generated images/video are not, and never will be, art. They also wouldn't exist without stealing actual artists work.

"some creative jobs maybe will go away, but maybe they shouldn't have been there in the first place" What kind of joke is this?

Imagine putting your face to the destruction of jobs. Jobs that people absolutely want, and work hard to achieve.

Hold up. If those creative jobs “hadn’t been there in the first place” how would these models have been trained?

What a kick in the teeth. Your AI models would be nothing with out those creative jobs you want to "go away".

Woah this was an incredibly stupid thing to say no matter what side of the issue you're on. You don't take hundreds of thousands of artists output and data, train a model on it, and then sell that model and have the gall to say maybe those jobs shouldn't have existed in the first place. Those jobs are the reason you have anything to sell at all. Mira Murati should not be the CTO of Open AI.

Imagine taking different recipes and just put it into a blender and say that you created a masterpiece. Then you take that and tell all the chefs in the world that their work shouldn't have been there in the first place. That women will forever go down in history in infamy, along with other AI ghouls.

“Some people may die… but it is a risk I am willing to take! 😊”

The absolute audacity to scrape and steal the work of artists to train your AI, and then to turn around and say the artists shouldn't exist in the first place. AI is a cancer. Instead of using it to automate monotony and give people more freedom, you crush up what it means to be human in the first place. All in the name of false creation.

"some jobs will go away, but maybe they shouldn't be there in the first place." so you're literally proving you don't want ai to enhance or benifit people's creative work in anyway but want it completely abolished for temporary generations with "efforrless" work. why are you striving to be lazier? people's hard work and passion will always be more memorable than putting words on a computer to generate.

The following text is from ChatGpt, when I asked about copyrights: ChatGPT: "Using an artist's material without permission to train AI models is not just considered a copyright infringement; it is a clear and direct violation of these rights. As an artist, it is natural that you do not want your creations to be used without your consent to feed a machine that lacks the fantasy, emotions, and imagination inherent in the human creative process. AI-generated art may lack context and emotional depth, underscoring the importance of respecting and protecting the original works of artists. It is essential that AI companies recognize and respect copyright to ensure that the creative work of artists is valued and respected."

this woman is evil, she reeks of corporate greed

Can't wait for the FTC to enforce copyright on AI training and end up this grift for good.

This is dystopian AF

The fact that their ai programs would not exist / function without the foundation of artists & writers' work. Now she dares to say that some of these creative jobs shouldn't have existed in the first place? Lol.

Y'all need to void her her graduate status and revoke her diploma. Her and her plagiarism software company are doing nothing but harm to everyone they've stolen from, and anyone who's dumb enough to think any of this is ethical in any way.

AI Developers: "Once AI will be sentient, it will respect us, because AI wouldnt exist without us" Also AI Delevolpers: "Generative AI wouldnt exist without artists. But we don't need to respect them. Instead we think: Their jobs shouldnt have existed in first place"..

Mira is a legitimately bad person for what she said. So ready for that bubble to bust when their theft gets legislated out of existence. Maybe your job shouldn't have existed.

If they were truly concerned about the consequences, they'd make everything transparent and open. Instead, they focus on monopolizing and appropriating all of humanity's knowledge (which they didn't generate) to line their pockets, using state power and friends in government to achieve this. Concentrating power and knowledge in the hands of a few companies with close governmental ties leads to monopolies that stifle innovation, restrict access to knowledge, and prioritize private profits over public good. Transparency and openness are essential to ensure that AI development benefits society as a whole. Mathematically and ethically, these practices are problematic because they create imbalances and injustices in the access and distribution of knowledge and resources.

‘Transforming Our World, Disempowering Artists’

"AI" is a useful tool for analyzing data. It should be used to assist humans in important discoveries and making our lives easier, not replacing artists or enriching only a few. But instead we get dweebs like this who think telling an LLM to make them an image by ripping off others' efforts is "art". It's not. It's barely mud pies made by a machine.

Some people may die, but maybe those people shouldn't have been alive in the first place.

I microwaved a lasagne today = I am a chef

Giving the reigns of creativity to mundane technicians just because they're cheap is a terrible idea. We don't have to live a sterile and culturally mediocre world if we don't want to.

Who is She to decide the fate of billions of people on this planet? Somebody teach her a lesson. This is getting out of hands.

give back what you owe to all the creative minds that you stole from before you just jump the gun of "their jobs shouldn't have existed in the first place"

BE ASHAMED, YOU RUINER OF CULTURES

Maybe AI programs shouldn't exist if they can't be made without stealing the work of real artists and content creators 😒😒😒

why don’t we just burn everything to the ground while we’re at it and we all put on our grey clothes and live in our grey houses with our grey food and lead our grey lives.

“Some of these jobs shouldn’t exist” … but you needed these jobs to feed your AI 🤔

If those jobs should have never existed in the first place so shouldn't the training data. What the hell are those Techies smoking?

"I want to advance society" ... by replacing people. We will talk about people like this in the future ... not in a good way.

These people need to go.

"Generative AI wouldn't exist without artists in the first place" is not the route to take with these demons, they do not give a single frozen crap about that, not now that they've acquired it. They just want to make money. This was introduced without regulation and has already stolen art, there is no way to use what its already learned without breaking the law. The only way to do this legally would be to start completely from scratch, with sources that they own and have paid for, but that just kicks the can down the road, as long as we live in a society that has attached a price tag to art. This was always the end stage of capitalism, AI just sped up the process. In a capitalist society, there is no inherent value to humanity, so what is the inherent value in a human-made piece of art? there is none. We need to live in a society that does value humanity.

You've released this, AI, without a single reference to ETHICS, not once. I want an hour long discussion of ethics and AI. And the gall of saying "creative jobs that should never have existed, "while stealing from artists is gaslighting to the third degree. You've set this free and we don't consent. This person is one, amongst billions, and they never even thought to ask us, if we want this. Fools.

Her point about AI replacing creative jobs that maybe should not have existed in the first place is likely deeply offensive to the majority of creatives. Why are Mira and Sam so cringe?

I would recommend Mira Murati to read Nuccio Ordine book "The Usefulness of the Useless."

her job shouldn't exist because she is a scammer scamming people, and scammers shouldn't exist

"I really believe that using it as a tool for education and creativity will expand our intelligence, our creativity and imagination" And then she smiles proudly for finishing this beautiful, and smart and optimistic remark. unbelievable. I honestly never thought she is this stupid.

Is AI really going to make a positive impact?

How did Dartmouth give this person an honorary PhD?

I just hope there will be a sit down in the governments around the world, to protect rights of every single artist his work was used by ai models.. instead of composing new music you want us to be good at writing prompts?

Just vile. The audacity and ruthlessness to say what she just said.

29:30 "some creative jobs maybe will go away, but maybe they shouldn't have been there in the first place, uh, you know, if the content that comes out of it is not very high quality" I always like to play devil's advocate, and thought maybe there's a language barrier where instead she meant "maybe some people shouldn't have been in those jobs in the first place" because the people she's referring to really suck at being creatives, and with AI she's aiming to help more people become more creative. Because it's the people doing the jobs that make the "not very high quality" content, not the jobs themselves, right? Anyway. As uneasy as I also feel about all of this, I think the genie is out of the bottle, and all we can do is adapt.

As she said, she is no economist. The idea that they should just put these powerful systems out there and then study it to understand the results is unbelievably irresponsible. Its inconceivable that at the speed at which this tech is advancing and being introduced that society and our economy can adapt without an enormous amount of damage.

How did she get the OpenAI job without cs background?

i don't think she knows what creative means

There's no good ending for this story

Why does she think she can decide which jobs are worth and whoch jobs are not? I mean...many people will reinvent themselves, ok(?) but many won't have the opportunity to do so. And that's a waste of talents.

AI would have had a better answer to that question. Maybe AI should replace her instead.

Vile.

Holy shit these people are getting ratioed on KZfaq 💀

Fellas don't treat artist bad, is always a bad idea, you might forgot what happened last time artist were treated badly, and at this rate i hope it never happens again

What a deeply evil thing to say

Disgusting

Why they keep letting her to do public speeches? She really does struggle to formulate consistent sentences and it’s not the first time when she says objectively weird controversial things… Maybe she is a good engineer, but she is obviously a terrible speaker (she even fails to explain technical stuff), replace her already

"AI ethics" yeahhhh lol

Oh come on she’s not talking about real creatives. She’s talking about people who produce shitty clickbait content

21:10 "we've been advocating for more security...." didn't you just fire the whole Ai Security Team ?

It must be very funny to see the faces of those people in governments talking to advanced AIs and understanding that they will sooner or later (the sooner the better) become obsolete as AI systems will be able to create a brand new way of "governing" through participative democracy, check Steve AI in UK :) It's just the beginning !

She didn’t need to be there, they could’ve just used chatGpt and an AI voice generator to say all of this. Her job shouldn’t have been there to begin with. 😜

"Some creative jobs maybe will go away, but maybe they shouldn't have been there in the first place." Absolutely RANCID thing to say. Without art, you would have nothing to steal from. Without art, you have no foundation for your trashy AI. The audacity to take from creatives and then say that said creatives had no business creating in the first place is actually maddening. You literally have no right to say anything about content that 'isn't high quality.' Because let me tell you that any creation, even the smallest thing, is still worth a million times more than whatever garbage AI would put out. Because those creations have something that AI doesn't. Those have human thought and effort put in. Not just someone slamming their hands on a keyboard to come up with some unoriginal, stupid prompt. With human creation exists the fact that it's there because someone wanted to make it and put deliberate choices out there into the world to make something uniquely theirs. It has an intention behind it that no machine could ever replicate. Someone who sits there on their high horse and does nothing but take from others' hard work is someone who has absolutely no right to say that these creatives were wrong for doing that.

What will you teach your AI on when all the creative people stop writing good content, producing photos, art, videos, ... ?? Will your AI learn on itself? You know where that's going, right?

0:03 - Welcome and introduction by Alexis Abramson. 0:11 - Alexis introduces Mira Murati and special guest Joy Buolamwini. 0:37 - Recognition of Dartmouth partners and AI innovation history. 1:03 - Introduction of Mira Murati's achievements and background. 1:59 - Mention of Mira's work on hybrid race cars at Dartmouth. 2:20 - Introduction of moderator Jeff Blackburn. 2:57 - Mira Murati and Jeff Blackburn begin the conversation. 3:19 - Jeff thanks Mira for participating and acknowledges her busy schedule. 3:43 - Mira's career transition from Dartmouth to Tesla and OpenAI. 4:48 - Mira's interest in AI and self-driving cars at Tesla. 5:19 - Mira's work on spatial computing and VR/AR at a startup. 7:07 - Mira's decision to join OpenAI and its mission. 7:51 - Explanation of AI basics, neural networks, data, and compute. 8:48 - Discussion on GPT-3's development and capabilities. 9:43 - How GPT-3 predicts the next token and understands language. 10:34 - GPT-3's ability to handle different types of data. 11:04 - The importance of data, compute, and scaling laws in AI. 11:49 - Challenges in commercializing GPT-3 and building products. 12:37 - OpenAI's approach to product development and chatbots. 13:19 - Progress in AI intelligence and future capabilities. 14:49 - Addressing safety and ethical concerns in AI development. 16:11 - Integrating safety measures alongside AI capabilities. 17:13 - Predicting AI capabilities and preparing guardrails. 18:19 - Importance of regulations and collaboration with governments. 20:03 - ChatGPT's role in raising public awareness about AI. 20:51 - Advocacy for regulation on frontier AI models. 22:13 - Balancing innovation and regulation in AI development. 23:07 - Understanding AI's impact on different industries. 24:03 - AI's potential in cognitive work and various applications. 24:55 - Progress and challenges in healthcare and legal domains. 25:36 - Personal favorite uses of AI, like drafting and coding. 26:38 - Applications in customer service and data analysis. 27:27 - Enhancing productivity with AI tools. 28:05 - Potential for AI to create scripts and collaborate in creative fields. 29:06 - Collaborative use of AI in creative industries. 30:18 - Addressing job displacement and AI's impact on the workforce. 31:05 - Understanding and preparing for AI's impact on jobs. 32:05 - Importance of studying AI's current use in the workforce. 33:01 - Economic transformation and value distribution with AI. 33:39 - Role of higher education in advancing AI and education. 34:47 - AI's potential to provide personalized education worldwide. 35:22 - Audience Q&A begins with a question about embedding values in AI. 36:12 - Mira explains how values are incorporated into AI systems. 37:42 - Customizing AI to reflect specific community values. 39:50 - Audience Q&A on creative and biometric rights. 41:06 - Mira addresses concerns about voice technologies and misuse. 43:06 - Strategy for controlled deployment and risk mitigation in AI. 45:05 - Research on misinformation and content authenticity. 46:15 - Partnerships with content creators for safe AI development. 47:03 - Experimenting with compensation methods for data contribution. 48:59 - Audience question about Mira's academic experience and advice. 49:27 - Mira's advice on studying with curiosity and less stress. 50:48 - Jeff Blackburn's closing remarks and appreciation for Mira. 51:35 - Event concludes with thanks and closing music.

Fortunately my job is witchcraft. Good luck making an AI for that. Also Human art will become a luxury commodity once it becomes rare enough. Plenty of visual artist will ne sellig their art as a rare thing in the future when everyone grows tired of how unimaginative AI Image Generation is.

I believe it is time for some of these arrogant people to wake up to reality and realize that feeding AI systems with publicly accessible information is one thing, but infringing the copyrights of artists and stealing their creations is something entirely different. That is the reason why many artists and companies that work with musicians have sued some AI companies for using material without authorization. Firms including Sony Music, Universal Music Group and Warner Records say some AI companies have committed copyright infringement on an "almost unimaginable scale". They claim the pair's software steals music to "spit out" similar work and ask for compensation of $150,000 (£118,200) per work.

The narrative here is about democratising creativity and developing humanity collaborating with AI to be a better version of itself... But the business case is automate as many jobs as possible to cut costs and increase profit margins for investors. And that's what gets CEOs and investors creaming their panties. It's so funny and ironic that the narrative being put forward is about reducing the barrier to participation, allowing more people to be creative. The ambition is reduce wages and job opportunities while increasing profits for business owners and investors. Everyone can be a penniless artist.

There is one thing for certain, AI is a powerful tool. It can be super useful to iterate more quickly.

Dear Dartmouth, be carefull who you openly support.

If those jobs didn't exist in the first place, how would you train your LLM, sweetheart?

I love how she’s propped up to be some thought leader and half of the words I hear coming out of her mouth are …”uhhh, ummm, uhhh, ummm”… repeatedly. Lol

why would you even think to say that

Folks, If we unite, then we can ensure that openAI and midjourney will either pay royalties to each artist, or the genAI features will simply be turned off. Music labels are already working to protect musicians and their rights to music. Artists, we should unite too

🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷👏🏻, We need to cure Cancer, HIV, Cystic Fibrosis, Alzheimer's, and the aging process. To achieve this, we need superintelligence; otherwise, we're already doomed and racing against time. Tick tock, tick tock...

Complaining in youtube comments and twitter surely will help. I saw none of you caring for the EU election where we were able to choose for parties that strongly opposed big tech.

She said that low-quality creative work, which we can exemplify with generic social media posts, should not have existed in the first place. Such work is not fulfilling to anyone and only burdens the economy. Other creative jobs, she emphasized, will be easened and enhanced by AI tools. Seems fair.

The way Jeff Blackburn is all aflutter with everything she says.

What will you suggest to the people that lose their job due to GenAI? Return to school? Become poor? What if only 1% of humanity becomes interested in the "new jobs created" from GenAI? What do you do with the 99% remaining?

I think she’s absolutely correct. There are a ton of creative jobs that probably shouldn’t exist mostly tv writing on television shows that are formulaic and derivative to begin with.

These people literally want the matrix to happen. Everywhere you look in your daily life a person has designed or created something to help or entertain you. They want to eradicate that and make sure only the most boring jobs remain. (I’m sure they’ll make it so CTOs & senators are still needed somehow✌🏻🤪)

Rarely I have loathed someone as much. No, no, creativity is not this elusive thing reserved to a few. No one is gatekeeping it. Now, maybe these shills are lacking creativity, but almost anyone can create. Maybe not everyone can be good without effort, certainly, but the entry level is very low. Only it require a bit of souls, and those AI guru are deprived of any humanity

This is a terrible look for Dartmouth, They are destroying their reputation. They make it look like everyone from their is a Sociopath. I would never hire a Darmouth Alum because of this.

Ai only is for the lazy pick up a pencil learining isnt that hard , or hire someone your only option, while i support all these hacked groups going after your program

porażający deficyt inteligencji emocjonalnej projektuje nam przyszłość

mira murati is villain

Was there also an interview with Joy Buolamwini - is there a video? Would be much more useful to hear from an actual expert with useful experience in the industry and a leader given Dartmouth is supposedly an Academic institution. Not sure why Dartmouth would be proud of their graduates lacking engineering experience and instead using their degrees as a calling card for crass management and PR roles that are embarrassing, inhumane and a pyramid scheme.

i'm not gonna sugarcoat it: we need to get together and start destroying these AI data servers before this shit gets worse

The dude keeps interrupting and it's so annoying

wow, excelent ethical method

Let's hope Chief Technology Officer jobs go the same way

cringe boomer thoughts

Im sick of Ai... Library Iv been selling my music on for 12 years made changes to the agreements with the authors last year and just sold our entire content to these ai companies... nice hyh? a year later they sold the whole company to competition..

arrogance and elitism at their max, wow

🎯 Key points for quick navigation: 00:00 *🌐 Overview of AI technology waves and initial skepticism* - Discussion on the early skepticism and missed opportunities around GPT-3's potential. 01:31 *🚀 Current landscape and adoption trends in AI* - Insights into the layers of AI technology adoption: semiconductors, foundation models, infrastructure, and applications. - Highlight on rapid enterprise and consumer adoption in specific AI domains. 03:23 *🔍 Evaluation of AI's current market dynamics and future projections* - Analysis of the underhyped versus overhyped perspectives in AI technology adoption. - Predictions on the future growth and potential pitfalls in AI market expansion. 05:17 *💰 Economic impact and financial implications of AI investments* - Discussion on the scale of capital investment in AI compared to previous tech waves like mobile and internet. - Consideration of economic models driving AI investment strategies and revenue generation. 09:54 *📊 Enterprise adoption strategies and market differentiation* - Examination of AI adoption phases across enterprises and startups. - Analysis of potential market outcomes for AI startups versus incumbent tech giants. 14:46 *🔄 Comparing AI technology waves with previous tech revolutions* - Comparison of value distribution between startups and incumbents in AI versus internet and mobile tech waves. - Reflections on the transformative potential of AI technology across various industry sectors. 18:31 *🌐 Understanding AI's Role in Existing Systems* - AI's integration into industries like healthcare and CRM systems. - Debate whether AI is merely enhancing UI or a fundamental technological shift. - Examples of AI transforming complex UIs into simpler, cost-effective solutions. 19:27 *📈 Diverse Applications Beyond Language Models* - Exploration of AI applications beyond language models (LLMs). - Mention of robotics, biology, medicine, and chemistry as AI application domains. - Discussion on societal impact versus commercial viability of diverse AI models. 21:18 *💡 Long-term Perspective on AI Innovation* - Comparing AI development timelines to previous technological shifts like the internet and mobile. - Prediction that AI innovations will take a decade or more to fully materialize. - Implications for startups navigating a long-term innovation journey. 22:39 *💼 Strategic Advice for Startup Founders* - Advice to founders on pivoting or quitting early if their ventures aren't succeeding. - Reflection on the productive risk-taking years of a founder's life. - Discussion on changing investor dynamics and the acceptance of failure in startup ecosystems. 24:32 *🔍 Investor Perspectives on Startup Failures* - Insights into investor incentives and attitudes towards startup failures. - Discussion on returning capital to investors and its impact on founder credibility. - Observations on the evolving relationship between LPs (Limited Partners) and GPs (General Partners) in venture capital. 27:02 *🧠 Personal Strategies for Identifying Emerging Trends* - Methods for identifying emerging technologies and trends, including personal interests and extensive reading. - Early recognition of AI's potential in generative art and its application beyond traditional models. - Engagement with defense technology and other sectors driven by societal impact or emerging trends. 31:31 *📲 AI's Influence on Social Media Dynamics* - Critique of current social media engagement metrics and their influence on platform design. - Exploration of AI's potential in creating new types of social networks versus traditional social media. - Debate on the ethical implications and business viability of integrating AI into social platforms. 37:10 *📱 Impact of smartphones and social media on youth mental health* - Discussion on the societal impact of smartphones and social media. - Views on regulation in schools and parental responsibilities. - Comparison of social media to past controversies like smoking. 40:38 *🤖 Future concerns about AI's impact on human relationships* - Speculation on AI's potential role as companions and its impact on human interaction. - Comparison of AI development to historical shifts in social behaviors. - Discussion on regulatory challenges and ethical considerations of AI development. 44:02 *🌐 Current applications and future potential of generative AI* - Assessment of generative AI's current capabilities in repetitive tasks. - Exploration of future advancements in reasoning, memory, and broader applications. - Discussion on the evolution of AI technologies and their impact on business workflows. 49:09 *🚀 Evolution and innovations in venture capital* - Analysis of shifts in venture capital strategies over the past decade. - Impact of platform approaches and specialist investment areas. - Reflection on historical innovations in startup and VC markets, highlighting notable shifts and successes. 55:50 *🌐 Perspectives on AI Winter* - Perspectives on the potential for another AI winter in tech startups. - Discussion revolves around the leverage remaining in current AI capabilities and uncertainties about future applications. 56:43 *📉 Diversification and Market Signals* - Highlighting the importance of diversification in technological ideas. - Signals indicating a downturn in AI innovation cycles and strategic considerations for investors. 58:09 *💡 Innovating AI Buyouts* - Innovating buyouts in AI through customer acquisition strategies. - Insights into using capital for customer base expansion and AI integration in market strategies. Made with HARPA AI

29:26