Omg ty for this

@@ki-zenn np

Thank you for letting me watch what I came here for without his dumb fucking opinions

My most been over 8000 for "selling" fake Hublots 😂

You deserve 10k likes for this

you didnt listen to others ? like other ai ?

AI everything is evolving at uberspeed

And musicians are gonna start whining.

Evolving. LOL.

@@Anti-HyperLink Definitely don’t want those fleshy meat puppets whining, do we?

This A.I. music is nothing but a copycat

Same

dont worry , it sounds cheap and cheesy , like the ppl who believe in it !!!

i think musicians are in the safe space in ai advancement. a person can become the next hans Zimmer, ai can't. ai can't even tell if the music it created sounds good or not

@@MorbiusBlueBalls we said the same thing about AI images. The AI doesn't need to know if it's good, we do. We say what's good or not and it listens.

And it's opening a low pass filter on the synths

@@therantingboy no, a crescendo is necessarily an increase in volume. A lo pass filter affects frequency, not amplitude.

Honestly. My analog syth from 1978 could do this. I guess it's easy to be impressed when you don't know anything lol

Well said. He probably was thinking of a crescendo.

On a serious note, the main issue at the moment is the audio quality. If there were another model that could scale up the resolution, I would listen to these songs along with my other favorite music.

I usually don't participate on youtube conversations but I'm so horrified by the points of view from a lot of people in every single ai art generation that I need to say it out loud (or type it). The fact that you (and countless others) don't see any ethic concern is a really worrying sign. Let me spell some concerns for you. First of all, the AI are fed with works made by real people, not machines, who devoted their lives to perfect their art. They haven't been asked for their permission, not just that but after having conversations with many professionals and talented amateurs I've noticed that 99% are angry and borderline depressed. Not only someone's using their work, which took them a lifetime to develop, to feed a machine meant to replace them. Not just that, but all of a sudden their live's purpose is swept from underneath their feet. I don't know if you know many artists, but it's not just a profession, for most it's a 24 hour thing, an obsession and a goal in life. Then there's the fact that you think about music as something without any effect on society in general. Just think about what would've happened to the 60's without the counterculture movement, or the effect 1984 has had on people's perception of government control. Art is not just pretty meaningless things to stare at, it can be the glue to unite a generation, it could be a mirror to represent problems so abstract that are difficult to articulate. In some cases it's the physical manifestation or an amplifier of a collective's emotions,, principles, lifestyle... and also what will be left behind once that collective dissapears. Letting corporations manage that power (which has been happening way before AI took shape, but is now reaching a point of no return) implies a significant mean of mass propaganda, because in some ways it's a mean to control a group's identity and way of thinking. DOn't forget burning books and killing artists is one of the first things authoritarian regimes do. Nowadays it sounds naive to say that, but that's because art has been steadily deployed from it's meaning and it's mostly shallow and hollow. But AI will be the nail on the coffin. Then there's the economical aspect, who's goign to benefit from a model trained on creative workers? Mainly corporations and people who didn't create anything. Then the aspect of denying future generation of their artists. Who's going to go through all the hardships that are needed to become a really good artists if a machine can give you something with just a loose description? What's going to be the motivation if the final result is irrelevance and being forgotten in the noise of millions of meaningless and derivative AI generated images/songs?. Then there's the worrying homogenization of talent. Fifty years ago there were a lot of jobs that required different ways of thinking. Although I'm not that old I've seen the change from that model where an artist,a writer, an administrative... they all had to have their own set of skills and a unique way of thinking. Now the only profile needed for every job is a programmer. You can record and album without knowing a single thing about music but you will have a lot of problems if you don't know a single thing about computers. Because everything tends to be optimized for a certain type of person, not the target professionals. And although I have many friends who are wonderful human beings and work in the field, I've seen with the years that as a collective is quite a toxic one, assuming that everyone should have the same thought process as them and transforming any profession into theirs, even when that means a negative impact on the target professionals instead of helping them. Then, there's the question. WHY. There's countless things AI could be doing to benefit our world (alphafold comes to mind) and in my opinion progress means making our lifes better. I don't see how this makes anyone life's better. Certainly not for musicians, not for listeners who may be fooled into it but in the end will have a shallow experience instead of a real human connection (which music is all about). Meanwhile, the jobs that are left for us are becoming incresingly more depressing, with positions that are based on repetitive tasks that an AI should be doing, working hard in something unfulfilling and meaningless jobs. I think it's really cruel to live in a world where humans have to do things they hate for a living while computers do the things we wish we could be doing.

@@javier_afonso I'm actually also a musician. Nothing that I've made has been listened to by very many people, and I've never had any hopes of making money from my music. I still will continue to create music because it is part of what gives my life meaning, and the presence of other music in the world (whether created by humans or AI) can never prevent me from making my own music. Music models like this one can actually help me by giving me ideas for chords, melodies, rhythms, and even timbres to use. If you only consider music meaningful when it is famous and appreciated by millions of people, then that is out of reach for virtually all musicians already. As for concerns about people supporting themselves through their music, and how AI will affect that, this video addresses it well: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j8mmi7GV0LG1qHk.html My original comment was a reference to when OpenAI wouldn't make their original GPT-3 public due to safety concerns, and how music doesn't have that same specific type of danger. I was only thinking of instrumental music, though, and you have a good point that vocals can carry propaganda messages. I do recognize the ethical concerns of training models on data without permission, and also the potential threat to many jobs.

Music is far more influential than text

@@javier_afonso There's no need to worry about ethics here. If you don't want people to use your work, simply don't make it available to the public. It's not uncommon for musicians to draw inspiration from each other and create something entirely new. Your concern seems to stem from a fear of the unknown, but as a composer myself, I don't find the use of AI threatening at all. I can still create music regardless of whether others can or not. Additionally, it's irrelevant whether a piece of music was created by a human or a computer if someone enjoys it. The fact is that the future is here, so you can either dwell in despair or embrace it. As for me, I'm going to focus on making music.

Agree

I won't be holding my breath

their trash ai is nothing worth attention fr fr .

@@sasufreqchann also most of there projects just get axed in end and end up in google graveyard

They probably never will.

Lol have you never listened to non-english music before?

@@games528 LOL, Not to brag or anything but Im native bilingual in French/English and fluent in Spanish. But also these faux lyrics have a very English form and sound to them which is why I thought of that example.

Virtual Reality is dead man, because social media exists, why would you try to build your audience as a 3D model anyone can do it's far less useful than AR man

I'm hoping for Text to 3D modeling and also Text to VR too. VR is not dead.

@@holdthetruthhostage vr would still be good for games

@@holdthetruthhostage the quest 2 is kinda making vr relevant again.

Two kind of persons, one that thinks that AI should do everything for you and one that see it just as a tool among many - which both can disturb you to finish anything

Its simple, you just describe the music you like and it will generate a similar music.

6-12 months?

@@tonyanimations5377 you're right but I feel as though having access to the entirety of a playlist would be working with more data than what you might be able to provide in a text prompt but I could be wrong. I don't know how this ai functions

It kind of can already from what is shown. They have music to music, just like we have img to img in Dall-e and stable diffusion. You load a music and then ask it to create a variation.

@@VperVendetta1992 I haven't seen much in the ai music generation space other than what's presented here and jukebox ai

think majority of the ai systems they are showcasing currently can only run on super computers on quantum processors and with Petabytes of storage and almost a Terabyte of Ram/VRam

@@kuromiLayfe You can run stable diffusion with great results with modern Nvidia video cards, so no. This is not that different in terms of resources. And they can anyway offer an API endpoint like OpenAI.

@@kuromiLayfe You'd only need that if you want to train these models

as much id like to use this, dont think we'd be able to try it anytime soon, if ever,

@@VperVendetta1992 but can modern day home systems generate 15 second video at 12 fps 720p in 4 seconds per video? or would you need to get your hand on A100 GPU’s to get even close

Some years?

@@greglory Even I wouldn't be surprised if it comes down to months - or a working prototype is running somewhere.

@@burkhardstackelberg1203 no doubt. I've been trying to find an old article (either by Vice or Wired), in which the author went to an AI conference. The guys there told him they would trickle this stuff out, there reasoning was how it would effect employment. He thought they were being over enthusiastic, to which they replied it wasn't hyperbole...these tools were ready...that article was 2017 I believe.

Months? Lol it's already been 1/3 of a year

Welcome to the craftsmans experience of industrialisation. There was no pity shown for the craftsmen then. Automation have made masses unemployed, no pity shown to them. Welcome to the working class experience for more then a century. Tell me, why should we show any pity now of a sudden? Time to learn to do...Nothing. Everything will be done better by machines, even art.

@@michaelpettersson4919Just because pity was not shown before does not make it right.

that sounds so wonderful!

Just make it yourself. This is for lazy people.

@@tickledonions9483 Exactly what I thought. I prefer raw instruments over clicking a button and boom.

Write those melodies down like most people do. Then play them once you get an instrument

Heck midi already exists.

Above comment generated by AI

@@TraderTimmyMaybe, but still correct for now.

Yeah sometimes its so hard to understand lyrics

It's passable, but when you listen closely a lot of it kind of sounds like nonsense (i don't just mean the vocals). It's completely devoid of soul, and sounds like what an alien would make if you described music to it and it went off of that. It has an uncanny valley effect that when you listen to it closely, doesn't really sound like good music. It's interesting to hear non-musical people interpret it versus actual musicians who understand how actual music is created and composed.

@@darkwraithcovenantindustries Agreed, it sounds crappy and soulless to a more "trained ear".

Where is the computer museum located at?

Thanks dude!

not that clever after all theres still only 12 notes

Is that a good thing?

Ridiculous. I can't believe this is how you imagine it will play out, think harder.

It'll be a trip fr. Imagine a game where the only parameters u give the ai is the prompt for the storyline and how long u want to spend playing and it tailors the game to perfection

@@FinalfixMusic maybe you should think harder, bro. I can also see OP's vision playing out. Human's not required, better get used to it.

@@anarki777 Oh I have no doubt! IMO OP's imagination did not stretch far enough.

Dynamic music is nothing new. It's not exclusively an AI related concept.

It's certainly a convenience

I am playing around with Synthesizer V now. I am going to create vocals for a track that I've made with it.

This makes no sense. What has a synthesizer to do with AI?

@@Flo-zo4mr init

buy music licenses or use the free music that it is available on the internet (ever heard of creative commons?) no need for AI, there is plenty of materials....thank god for now that music AI is still pretty bad.

Technoaxe.

The content creators will eventually be replaced as well

I agree. It's not even about what's technically possible now. That's a given and it's a given that that is gonna improve unimaginably. It's now just about paying attention to what areas are subject to these huge changes. And that could be anything. Weird times.

I see that you watch 2 minute papers too ;)

Great prediction, things will improve.

It's inevitably going to replace and inflate the entire market though.

That's what digital artists are for! These AI programs are hurting and stealing from artists and gives no credit to the artists from where the art is taken! AI sucks in this sense

Meh. Learn an instrument you’ll be fine. These talentless people will only fall into circles jerks of self praise like ai art. They are doing nothing. And are talentless. Learn a skill. This will separate people who are worth something in the future.

How can your skill be obsolete if another tool will be available for you too? Do you think this tool will work better in your hands or in the hands of somebody who can't tell the difference between a guitar and a bass? :)

​@@ChristianIce They need you to describe skill. LMAO. cause AI people have none

@@ChristianIce A hammer isn't a tool if it just makes the whole house.

@@Octamed You mean you would listen only to music with an AI voice saying random stuff? Even in 1000 years only crazy people would do that, it's completly pointless.

The goal of their AI projects, is to make money and releasing their AI with no fundamental plan on how to make money isn’t wise. This AI music will probably be sold to professionals, and will be used as a tool to music creators. Not everything is free in life.

@@maxpro751 oh yeah i forgot google is like the biggest company on earth

When everything is randomly generated, nothing will have meaning.

@@tickledonions9483 if things can be randomly generated, then that fact alone should bother you more than the actual random generation.

@@drowzy2309 A good example of this is ourselves. Our genetics are randomly generated and thus influence a lot of factors about our looks and behavior, among other things. Thus, even humans themselves aren't safe from the burden of random generation. Just some food for philosophical thought.

Chat GPT, write me lyrics. Music LM, make a song with these Lyrics. Chat GPT, write a quick summary of this song. Perfect!

Lazy, pure lazy. If you don't have something to use your brain and abilities toward, why think or create at all? Sensless.

​@@MagicBus101 i feel like over the next few decades we humans will start to see an evolutionary branch off consisting of the humans that have relinquished their creativity and thinking abilities into technology, contrasting the humans who stayed true to discipline and faith in evolution and god. Unless the actions of the unconscious humans cause some sort of all around extinction, we will see a new breed of human that will be interested in nothing but Instant gratification, like sex and attention. Oh wait🤔...

Sarcasm is welcome.

Not that hard just make it remove the vocals from the audio which we already javelin AI for that then use one of the AIs that can do vocals which we already have ,we need one that can search the internet and grab snipets of somebody singing to get samples for the voice copying AI (which exists already) and then just replace the vocals with that then a mixing AI

Yeah, but your art will also be the same style, and nothing inspirational. It is great for now because the tool is new, but come 10 years when everyone and their mama is using the same data set from 2020 or 2021, because most real artist jobs have been lost, eveything will still have the same inflections and noise.. Just like many commericals we see today, probably also heavily relying on computer imput or recommendations. Just remembert, the haggle is sometimes part of the process to become better. Everyone skipping to AI to try and avoid that, will make for a dull world in the end indeed.

Society will get lazier with ai art, this person is proof of this.

Will it sign your guitar ? At the concert, Who's on stage ? Bunch of lip sync dancers and choreography pretending they wrote this sh*t ? And, you believing it ?

Humanity is finished.

Agreed

Also this term in the AI world ‘x is solved’ i.e. music is solved… is a weird phrase when considering an invention used to give meaning to humans + their times. We gotta be careful

How so? AI creating art won't stop humans from continuing to create. If you need to make money from your art for it to have meaning, it never had meaning to begin with.

I think it depends who you are and your specific circumstances. Just because people make money from their art doesn’t mean it doesn’t have meaning. Everyone has to make a living. My point is really that if we are creating these tools, also be creating the support network for the disruption simultaneously. Btw I’m in general FOR expanding human creativity which these tools will obviously do.

@@wgxyz making money for art doesn't invalidate the art's meaning, but NEEDING to make a living from your art for it to have meaning, makes the art meaningless.

I'm a musician. To me it's very exciting. There are some parts of music making process which are tedious. I think within next decade or few, AI won't be good enough to completely replace artists, but I think it will be a very useful tool (just like CGI in movies is). That being said, I think AI generated content is inevitable at this point. I think in the future you'll be able to enter a prompt, and see a randomly generated movie just like our brains generate dreams. Scary and fun times are comming.

After watching so many KZfaq tutorial videos about trading I was still making losses untill Akilina fan started managing my investment now, I make $6,800 weekly. God bless Akilina Nosova . She has been a blessing to my family.

Please how can I contact Akilina Nosova fan? I really like what she has done for you, and I also want to benefit from it.

She's active on tele_gram

@Akilinanosova

Thanks 😊

Spotify has had this for 2 years no?