Your voice is better than the AI if you ask me...

love this producer

nice

What AI did you use to change your vocals?

While AI singing or just using AI as voice over is great for in studio recording and listening, it is not good for live performances. We human actually like to hear real human singing and playing musical instruments in opinion. We human wants some errors in our work. It's our nature way to be flawed and accept some of those flaws. Not make everything as perfection in my eyes. Lol.

Hahaha thank you man, that actually means a lot. With this AI tech you really dont need your voice to be special at all which is so great

@@mhamusic. no joke there’s nothing to cringe about , your voice is really good . Make your own tracks with your voice 😮‍💨

@@mhamusic. I struggle with this one too ngl. I hate my voice, but everyone else seems to think it's ok. I think it's just something you have to learn to get past. Your voice is great! Use it and it'll get even better.

Mind blown.

Really now ?🤔

Dumb

True 👌🏻🔥

Wait what? Really?

Stuff like this is what this technology is great for!

Well there is already that with the kontakt things by native instruments check the dominus choir or the eastwest Hollywood choirs

@@salvab_music yea but it feels different if you control it with your own voice Tho this workflow sucks for now

Agreed!

@@salvab_musiclmao this is nothing like that

Working on it.

@@jeremywright7832 Seriously? You mean that you are? I would love to be kept updated on that.

We need this implemented with all the other AI models into one big super AI model that does everything by itself exactly like a person but infinitely better ❤

I really don't like this whole ai thing. Music would really lose originality

@@DrilextBeatz If music will be noticeably less original with AI, then many people will still crave and make music without AI. And when it finally does become as 'original' (this will certainly happen with enough time), then there is no difference as a music consumer if originality is what you want.

Exactly that! Thanks for watching

Good to hear that!! And thanks so much

Best comment

😂😂😂😂

I hope this will be the standard workflow for producers.

So where do you find trained singers laying around with amazing voices?

@@michaelsanders9147 Well, it's certainly easier to get good singers to work with you if you already have a song that sounds top notch and has vocals that represent what the finished product will sound like.

I can see how this would help also!

Yamaha: or you know,you can just buy our vocaloid

Yeah. That's me. A songwriter with no real vocal talent or producing skills. This tool will help my pre-drmos sound much better I hope. I'm excited about the prospects

Vocaloid exist for a reason,you might want to look into it.

Scary for singers and recording technicians! Heaven for producers.

@@MrSatoou That is very true, but I have also seen many softwares / websites that can create full songs in seconds. A lot is about to change in the music industry... But I am 100% excited for what resources are now available.

why is it scary for producers... think its more scary for the singers lol

@@moneyboss777 I think a good chunk of producers can realistically be replaced with tools like Soundraw and Google's Music LM

@@codymeyertv the whole music industry can be replaced bro lol

Right, ad 4 famous singers mixed as one voice and it will be almost impossible so sue

@@bubblanbIt is impossible to sue in any case, voice is not a subject to copyright

@@FedorLosev i think it there is a legislative limbo in this space but I would not be so sure if faking a voice of another pro singer that is already in the market does not violate any laws. It should. Even Bjorn from Abba mentioned about those challenges ...

@@user-do8kh5fk5nI don't think there is a limbo. For sure it is not and can not be covered by any copyright law (as it is not a creation). But if you pretend to be somebody, make an identity with somebody or their publicity without permission, it is a completely different story. It is covered by personality rights etc. laws. So, if one produces a song in a genre and style of a known performer with a generated voice, making a clear connection to a specific person, yes, it is asking for a trouble. But in such a case it is less related to the voice or generation per se, and more to using a personality without permission. Background vocal in a different style/genre without clear connection to a personality is unlikely to constitute a case of misusing personality rights. Actually, it is not different in any way from using human voice similarity or face similarity (there are many people with a voice or a look similar to celebrities), be it generative or natural doesn't matter. "Faking" voice is irrelevant, but faking identity is. For example, you can hire a singer with a voice quite identical to a famous singer. The possibility of getting sued depends only on whether there is provable exploitation of a link to personal identity.

@@FedorLosev yes it makes sense what you have written

❤️

Damn, I thought one of these tools would be able to make your own model. I know some people have done that but it was way more advanced.

This the best idea I have heard. AI enhancing the user's voice to sound as good as the pros....or better!

On the first link there was a option to train your own ai voice

We pretty soon will connect our own individual intellectual properties to the blockhain. Can you imagine? Due to copyright, that's the current way I see the future developing, we will be charging $ to use that IP.

I´d feel completely imbecil if I would ever find myself in a situation where I am faking another artist`s original voice. Why would you do that? To break your bathroom-mirror?

Thank you!

I was too lazy to comment before I saw yours, but yeah, agreed. The singing is pretty good actually. Not cringy at all.

​@@heroforesthis songs are good too. I was like "Who is this guy? New subby: 😊

Appreciate it 🙏

Yes it is. As a Songwriter this video has given me life 😊

Yup, still early stages. Its the wild West right now! Completely agree with you

I Second This 🙋‍♂️

Thanks guys!

I expect the music industry to attempt to use AI to cut out artists entirely

I was at a conference about Computer-assisted music in France, they (the music industry) were talking about this very topic ... in 1999.

they should take it serious? hahaha who do you think is behind all this?

npc comment, you got to be insane to say that, there's no single though behind your comment.

💯💯💯

For real .People with Real talent will be replaced by computer nerds

the career is decided by the consumer that buys the end product!

Thanks for the kind words! I really appreciate that ❤️

It's already happening search Michael Jackson n stuff

Really appreciate that mate 🙏❤️

Good idea! Thanks!

I was gonna mention the ability to do this in melodyne

It does sound like melodyne but it also doesn’t sound like a real voice

​@justinstewart3248 sounds pretty good too me

You are wrong. Any part of the music industry that likes vocals that sound like this, already has ways to obtain vocals that sound like this. Everybody else, who things the vocals in this video sound absolutely dreadful (like me), is not even remotely interested in AI. So nothing will change at all. Shit pop music will remain shit pop music, real heartfelt, human, skill and training based music will remain so as well and will not make use of AI.

@@isaacnewtech how am I wrong? This is just the beginning of AI in music, pretty soon everything will be made with AI in one way or another, the music industry will change dramatically in the next 5 years and less.

🙏❤️

If she don't like it she will take it down tho 😂

@@kahyui2486 I think she has every right to disallow use of her "own" voice out there saying things she wouldn't want to or sining in ways she wouldn't. I've listened to a couple songs already made with her A.I. voice, and as a longtime fan of hers it was clear it wasn't really her, either because they had her singing in a range lower than she ever sings, or the voice lacks the slight lisp that is a delightful part of her sound. But after hearing her latest release "welcome to the opera" a few days ago I decided I'm really inspired to make a song with "her"!

But why would you do that as a creative person?

@@razoraz no shit sherlock

@@kojoefante when you're already a multimillionaire with nothing to lose. It's asinine and completely out of touch with the reality of small creators, who DON'T have access to giant legal teams ready to enforce their will.

Its just through my sm7b and doing multiple takes and compression, eq etc

Lmao

We just need someone to release an Ed Sheeran song, sung by Marvin Gaye 😂

Thanks so so much!

🙏❤️

Haha thank you!

It could! I think different voice models work best in different ways, depending on your voice and the model of course

Can slide? As in, go away?

@@drinkinslim AI in music has been around for a long time and is very common. It's used in everything from instrument separation tools, remixing, and even neural network denoisers and de-reverbs. The ability to reasonably make your voice sound like the opposite gender of you for vocals is literally the impossible made possible. This is what I meant by "one of those things that can slide." AI is so misunderstood and misused that it became the boogeyman of the internet. I don't see the integrity of stealing a big artist's voice and putting it under a beat generated to sound like some big producer's style for clout and money, but using it as a tool to creatively achieve a unique sound you are seeking without the help of others makes artists even more independent and retains integrity. AI is a tool, and so it should be thought of, and used like one. No tool can replace humans, as it relies on the expression and creativity of humans to be put to use, but it makes life easier for individuals trying to enjoy their hobby without getting peers and money into the equation.

Thank you so much!

Don’t use there name ;)

It's a very good question. Interesting to think of a future, where all art you see and hear, is AI generated.

Maybe. As a drummer though, you can get high quality drum samples that sound like real drums, you can buy drum packs that come with a bunch of beats. And you could use them live and they’d sound great, it’d save getting a drummer and would make a band simpler. But people still get drummers even though technically you can reproduce their sound digitally. I think in the future you will be able to customise any movie or song you want, but watching someone play an instrument live really well is a different type of experience.

Probably 5-10 months, not years.

That already exists

thats not really true. i think people don't really have a good conception of what makes something art. AI will be a great tool for producers and also will be able to to generate muzak, like 'chill lofi beats' and whatever bland background music / stock music, and maybe a pop / hip hop song. but anything that is truly art will never be able to be created with AI except with an artist using it as a tool. the idea it will just crank out art is just a false concept. AI is just a tool much like using logic pro or anything else. the reason why AI can't make art is because real art involves many subtle details, or a high degree of information. Like the best movies for example the director will be extremely meticulous with all the details on screen. Studies show the unconscous mind is aware of these details that the conscious mind isn't aware of. It takes in information an order of magnitude more than conscious mind, which is why subliminals work. in other words, there is a reason why we are able to tell when something is great even we don't know why. So this is why AI can't just crank out art like that, because it is the tiny details that only a master can do that makes something art and we CAN tell the difference. But yes AI will be able to make bland art. which actually could replace a lot of stuff as you suggest

thats genius

Really crazy

Like pretty much all AI, it seems to be threatening mid tier and below content creators. If you are a top quality vocalist, AI isn't going to replace you any time soon. Just like how sample libraries haven't really replaced live performance. Maybe over the next few decades but certainly not in the near future.

well you just have become producer or join a band. You just no longer get commissioned to sing someone else's music unless it large label that can afford it. AI synth vocal very human sounding. vocal synth can came a long way since 2004 with release of vocaloid 1. How ever vocal synth vocals are still underground thing. iF vocal synth song get 1,000 views it hit for genre.

Thats a perfect example of how being creative with this technology opens up new opportunities for everyone! Thanks for sharing :)

Exactly. Its like a dream has come true but still needs a looot of work

Completely agree!

Thanks a lot! Appreciate that! 🙏

Did you choose one? If so which did you prefer?

Glad you enjoyed it!