Whats your opinion of other ai's like chatsonic? Is chatgpt is best?

1. When I ask it to rewrite it, I always ask ChatGPT to keep the same layout because otherwise it will remove layouts like bulleted lists, etc and write coninuous texts. 2. Sometimes, adding just once a second space between two words lowers the fake rating of about 50%. I do this when I get something like a 11% fake. 3. Translating to another language (with google translate or deepl) and then back to English is yet another solution to reduce the fake rating. But not always. 4. I tried "Rewite it in a tone that is not typical to AI, keeping the same layout." and it didn't work while (as I usually do) trying a more direct way works better for me: "Rewrite your answer to pass through AI ouput detectors. Keep the same layout." works much better for me. Anyway, the important point here, is that you may try rephrasing your directive if it fails lowring the rating enough. And now the very bad news: even as if English is not my mother tongue, it happens that those detectors are sometimes rating my very own writing as 90 or 95% fake, especially when I pay attention to write a good text. 🤬🤬🤬 So, when it is important, even if you're honest, you'd better check your own work.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

yay

Hell sir i am from Indian .I am studing inter 1st and 2nd year concepts with the help of chat gtp .Please tell is it okay to study concelts from it and do i get always correct information from it?

Biggest problem is that chat gpt doesn't give you valid sources

@@irgendeinname9256 I was ask GPT to cite its sources and give the appropriate link in order verify. Sometimes though it’ll give you a dead-end 404 page.

Thay's not true, AI detectors can detect AI generated content based on pseudo-random textual watermarks, patterns of word distribution, and a mathematically calculated distribution of punctuation uncharacteristic of a human being. The patterns are based on mathematical probabilities which differentiate text produced by a machine in comparison to a human. Human generated text is much more random, whereas AI text has verifiable mathematical linguistic patterns built into the text, and that's the key difference.

@@subtronik9311 Yes. If you take text generated from an AI tool and you just put some extra spaces in it (as in change "my dog, Spot" to "my dog , Spot") by putting a space before the comma, and then do that a handful of times throughout the article it will be detected as close to 100% human written. That's how fragile the AI detection tools are.

I was running my own work through the detector stuff from years ago some of that was getting a 40% human rating...

@@smartduck904 Yeah it gave my own writing 50% AI generated, which it did for a paraphrased chat gpt content.

@@subtronik9311 i used texts long and short that i wrote completely by myself and it said it was mostly ai. It sucks ass and teachers shouldnt be allowed to use them to check hw or assignments because they are super unreliable

So basically I can use a response from ai and change some words around and it should show in turnitin as 100% authentic?

@@imohkryptic seems so but i wouldn't recommend it cuz u know if u only copy and past ur kinda screwt in exams

@@imohkryptic Change some of it and detectors will think it's more human. But it's quite unreliable, they need to hide some hidden hash or invisible characters when you copy paste. Just take some text you wrote and check it in any AI detector. These detectors often think original human texts are likely generated from AI. Maybe if you are bad at grammar it will think it's 100% human XD

@@MickDarkstar1 yea lately I’ve been using chatgpt for some papers but not copying everything completely more like if I get stuck or need help starting a paragraph and I take from the response then plug it into two ai detectors or also run it through a paraphrasing site and add some of my words and so far it’s been great lmao

its great. but how to deal with the fake citation and references generated by chatgpt ?

as inspiration is actually pretty fair

@@jochemvangalen9464 sadly there are free tools out there to paraphrase essays or they could just use grammarly or something

So it would just talk really formal and in common simple non complex vocabulary?

Okay this actually makes me hate OpenAI a little less now. They're doing something to stop people from being complete zombies with the usage of AI.

@@prabean69 lol

Anything chatGPT or other AI tools puts out is going to be close to 100% plagiarism free. they don't scrape the web and steal content.

Cap

Spot on. The best get even better

what if it's put in turn it in? does it show differently??

yea

Lol true

It works for me. I have tried many examples. Here is one of them. "Zig is designed to be easy to use and provide a high-level interface for common tasks, while also providing low-level control when needed. It has a simple, expressive syntax and a standard library that provides a wide range of functionality. Some of the key features of Zig include static typing, automatic memory management, and support for multiple programming paradigms. " - written by ChatGPT which gets detected as fake. But by telling ChatGPT to rephrase it in a way that will not be detected by an AI detector, it does that too. "Zig is an imperative, general-purpose, statically typed, compiled system programming language designed by Andrew Kelley. The language is designed for "robustness, optimality and maintainability", supporting compile-time generics, reflection and evaluation, cross-compilation and manual memory management." - Wikipedia (detects as real)

@@shazam314 Depends how you ask ChatGPT to rephrase. My own text is sometimes detected up to 99% fake !!

@@yoops66 Maybe your text is too short?

2000 IQ

hi. could you please share what would be the best platform to detect Ai writing?

@@bollywoodjam5304 Open AI has their “ai classifier” which is based off the same language model as chat gpt and admits when it can’t tell. I’m not sure if it’s the best though, better platforms may have been released since I looked

It is not the best, it says unclear, it is wrird

the same thing happened to my sister. she got accused of using chat gpt. she had rewrite the holw essay even if she didnt

this just happend to me, i used zero gpt to check my essay and it tells me that my text are 58% written by AI, i've never used ai to write my text because its still a new thing in my country

Nope. Didn't experience that. What kind of "watermark" do you think they may put in text? Sounds like an urban legend to me.

@@yoops66 They're currently developing it. Not employed yet.

@@yoops66 cryptography

@@alaminsagor7618 Looks like you don't know what you're talking about. How to put cryptography in clear text? And what for? It could be done in pictures, because there are so many nuances of colors and the, for example, one out of two nuances could be used for the picture, and the second for the picture and hidden information. For example, if the picture was only in grays, only even grayscales could be used for the pictures, and odd for hidden informations. And then it would be possible to encode data in binary base (0 would be even, and 1 would be odd). The human eye would barely see any difference with 256 levels of gray. But with pure text, there is no such opportunity.

@@etterath7049 Ha, you mean you know secret things ? Which are your sources and references ? (URLs please)

you mean to all teachers and professors 💀

Good point right there.

Buzzkill. Life is always about scamming the system.

@@shiny-7677 which is why i wouldn't use detectors. False positives. Unknown sensitivity and specificity. At the same time using AI to generate work thst's supposed to be coming from a studenr's own intelligence is cheating. So ive come up with some things for students to do that they can't use ChatGPT for. For now anyway. AI is an amazing tool. But learning requires effort from students and I'm paid to get students to learn stuff.

Love that your doing this!

@@shiny-7677 There are easy ways to tell if it's AI generated if the essay is not your style of writing is damn well sure not your own work.

Wow that’s amazing that’s how teachers should teach! I never agree they way most teachers are, it only makes the student learn just to pass the exam cut corners on the real application of the subject. This hinders autonomous critical thinking.

please elobarate on the formula its kinda confusing

@@preeflea Sure 1- First, write down what you want to say. Your first draft might be: "Exercise is good for your health and can help you feel better." 2- Next, revise it with your intended message and language level. Your revised draft might be: "Regular exercise has numerous benefits for your physical and mental health. Studies show that exercise can help reduce the risk of chronic diseases like heart disease and diabetes, while also improving mood, reducing stress, and boosting overall well-being." 3- Repeat the process a few times, using different language and organization to refine your ideas. Your third draft might be: "Exercise is a powerful tool for promoting long-term health and well-being. From reducing the risk of chronic disease to improving mental health and cognitive function, there are countless reasons to make exercise a regular part of your routine." 4- Use AI to help you combine your different ideas. You might use a tool like GPT-3 to generate new ways of phrasing your ideas or suggest new points to include. 5- Finally, make some small changes to your wording to create a final version that is polished and effective. Your final draft might be: "Whether you're looking to improve your physical health or boost your mood, regular exercise is one of the most powerful tools at your disposal. From reducing the risk of chronic diseases to enhancing cognitive function and improving overall well-being, exercise offers a wealth of benefits that are hard to ignore."

is that an ai generated comment 🤨

Quilbot rephrases what you put out there. I first wrote a chapter of a book with the help of Chatgpt then paraphrased it in Quilbot. Quilbot seems quite good. Then, i copied and pasted the paraphrased version of Quilbot to Ai detectors and most of them said it was mostly by human or shows little fake percentage rate.

Did you paste what you have gotten out of Chatgpt to WordAi, and it said it was 90% original? Then, it means word Ai is not reliable

@@ataberdi2064 it's usually around 95% so it's over 90% with WordAi, meaning it is the same as quillbot, but I'll try it too! thanks for sharing your feedback. I love technology!

The same way some people believe in a guru. My own writing is sometimes rated up to 99% fake.

nah chatgpt better

Run everything from got to Quillbot

EXACTLY RIGHT

I really like your point here. I honestly don’t know the answer here because yes, the generated text makes sense and often is even better than average human writing. But people are scared and want to call this fake although in reality its like hiring a talented writer and that is not considered fake right. I guess we will just have to wait and see

​@@aiadvantage Thanks for the comment. I genuinely believe, as someone who has been into Machine Learning for a while, that it is kind of inevitable that we will have to accept the reality and that we should get our priorities straight. I.e. we should all work on preventing the "Skynet" scenario rather than obsessing with anti-plagiarism to an extent where it will become a weapon of its own. As usual, going to extremes is what creates problems for us :/

​@@aiadvantage yes, I hate this system.

​@@VEGETADTX That is why it makes so much sense to escape from Matrix and drop out of college😅

Good point Simon. Should have separated those two a little more but soon they will become interchangeable as people flood the internet with ai generated content

My own writing is sometimes rated as 99% fake 😭🤬

Linked it in the description now :) Glad to hear you appreciate it

Complex algorithm that combines many palagrsised texts.

I think its important to rephrase a sentence if that’s the case so it can sound more naturally and even in the way you write it. Personally my tip is just rewrite a couple of sentences in your own words. Hell, even add a little bit of grammatical imperfections but that has to be done wisely or itll lower your grade for having too many errors and don’t add obvious grammatical errors everyone knows about, just errors that a person would occasionally make, which will make it more believable.

i need to know this too

I just tested the April turnitin drop on my channel: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oKePh6Z42bnMg5c.html

It knows it because it refers to your own chat history, I don't think anyone other than your accout can do this, but I am not sure.

Unless you credit your sources, it is considered plagiarism. If you intend to use AI-generated texts as your own intellectual production in an academic assignment, it will be considered plagiarism.

@@Pata1100 You're right, using AI generated text for academic essays is plagarism. The distinction is that it's never been published before so is unique text. This is basically the same as paying writer to write your essay. If AI generated text can be created which evades AI detectors then universities will face a huge problem.

true. sorry for that

pretty sure it won't, detectors aren't much reliable anyways. Too many false positives to be considered reliable.

Not really

As the name suggest , Gpt-2 output detector is for detecting output by gpt 2 , a far inferior version of ChatGPT(based on GPT-3.5) , so it's an outdated version. i think that the creator made a mistake. There are many chatGPT output detectors online though .

@@volokkolov9546 ahhh interesting, thought it was one shared database. Makes sense, cheers!

Hard to argue with this one :)

Not sure. 1. AI is feeded by web sites on the internet. 2. People will rely on AI and won't visit web sites anymore, or much less. Unlike with Google. 3. Web content creators won't have insentives anymore to create contents. 4. AI information sources will be dried up. Conclusion: AI will kill AI (and everything else). This is not the only realistic scenario, but it is definitely one. AI, until now, cannot create new content. It is currently just a tool that predicts the next word of a sentence. It doesn't think as we do. So, it needs to be trained with data.

There should be a video on screen, just double checked and its all setup hmm

yea that website is broken

I like this comment xD

I just tested the new Turnitin release on my channel: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oKePh6Z42bnMg5c.html

How will they know 100% it could be a false positive

That's the probability of it being fake, don't worry about it

Dunno man seems like you should debug thoroughly. ChatGPT can help with that for sure.

skill issue

@@Private_Account101 you maybe correct