AIM-174B United States New Longest-Range Air To Air Missile | F-18C Hornet Vs Su-27 + Su-57 | DCS |

  Рет қаралды 185,138

Growling Sidewinder

Growling Sidewinder

25 күн бұрын

Check out the Store: growling-sidewinder.creator-s...
CHECK OUT THE MINI DOCS CHANNEL: ‪@Mini_Docs‬
Join the channel if you wish to support
/ @growlingsidewinder
If You'd like to Support the Channel on Patreon:
/ growlingsidewinder
Join my Discord:
/ discord
Social Media
________________________________________________________
Instagram: / growling_sidewinder
Twitter: / growlingaim9
Facebook: / growlingaim9
Amazon Links for the products I use if you're interested:
_________________________________________________________
Link for Thrustmaster 16000M: amzn.to/2PQGYf2
Link for Trackir 5: amzn.to/2VSN4kt
Link for Warthog throttle/stick: amzn.to/2Vbfhyp
Contact me:
GrowlingSidewinder@hotmail.com
Disclaimer: Please Note that I use sound effects to enhance my videos for dramatic effect and hopefully give the viewer more immersion and also I use reshade for some better colors. (you can download reshade yourself and use it to make your DCS look like mine).
Processors: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core 3.4GHz (4.9GHz Max Boost)
Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS Elite WiFi
Memory: 128GB CORSAIR VENGEANCE RGB PRO 3200MHz (4x32GB)
System Cooling: CORSAIR H100i PRO XT RGB
Graphics Cards: NVIDIA 10GB GeForce RTX 3080
Operating System: MS Windows 10 Professional
Operating System Drive: 2TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus PCIe NVMe
Hard Drive: 2TB Samsung 980 PRO
Power Supply: CORSAIR AX1600i ATX Titanium
Tobii Head and Eye Tracking: www.tobii.com/
Virtual Reality: Pimax 8KX
HeadTracker: Trackir5
Thrustmaster F/A-18C Hornet stick and Warthog Throttle.
Thrustmaster TRP pedals.
On this channel we like to do a lot of dogfighting most videos are some sort of dogfight between 2 different aircraft as we explore their different capabilities. From time to time I like to dabble in Virtual Reality, I think VR is a great new technology and I love to show that stuff off for the channel from time to time.
If you enjoy war thunder or Microsoft flight simulator 2020 or even dogfighting in Battlefield 2042, consider getting yourself into Digital Combat Simulator by Eagle Dynamics, the Combat side of Aviation with the BVR and Dogfights really provides a different and interesting perspective on aviation. You can fly all kinds of combat aircraft including the F-16, F-15, F-14, JF-17, Su-27, Mig-29, Mirage and the F-18 Hornet along with many other aircraft and helicopters like the Ka-50 and Mi-8.

Пікірлер: 1 200
@GrowlingSidewinder
@GrowlingSidewinder 23 күн бұрын
Check out the Merch Store: growling-sidewinder.creator-spring.com/ Apex Gaming PC: apexgamingpcs.com/products/growling-sidewinder Thank you guys for watching and if you have any ideas for future videos please put them in the comment section below and they might just end up in the pipeline, thanks again, much Love.
@murph3194
@murph3194 23 күн бұрын
Let's see you strap the AIM-174B to the most inferior fighter that can hold it and go up against some hypersonic missiles. lol Just to see what happens. How about the F4 vs the 57.
@NightBeyondVeil
@NightBeyondVeil 23 күн бұрын
F-14 Tomcat
@richardnicklin654
@richardnicklin654 23 күн бұрын
When you say it has an AMRAAM seeker, we should remember that the electronics and software were lifted from the 120-C, but the antenna has almost twice the diameter, so four times the area. As a result it will pick up four times as much of the energy reflected from a target - quite the boon when shooting at long range and against “stealthy” targets.
@stevensutton2252
@stevensutton2252 23 күн бұрын
@@murph3194 russia has no air to air missiles that are hypersonic they only have air to ship missiles ie to hit large object and proven that cant hit a broadside of a barn from the inside
@willfrankunsubscribed
@willfrankunsubscribed 23 күн бұрын
F/A-18 with AIM-174B vs F-14 with AIM-54C
@TriggerVR657
@TriggerVR657 23 күн бұрын
Gentlemen, we have seen the return of the phoenix
@ivanthemadvandal8435
@ivanthemadvandal8435 23 күн бұрын
Definitely seems to have risen from the ashes
@Audfile
@Audfile 23 күн бұрын
And way way more advanced.
@Vespuchian
@Vespuchian 23 күн бұрын
Phoenix 2: explosive boogaloo
@SpeedfreakUK
@SpeedfreakUK 23 күн бұрын
AIM-174B “Big Bird”
@tatumergo3931
@tatumergo3931 23 күн бұрын
It was about time...
@gibboau85
@gibboau85 23 күн бұрын
F15 radar plus this would be ridiculous. Imagine an F15EX missile boat handing these out like Oprah.
@andersjjensen
@andersjjensen 23 күн бұрын
"You get to die! And you get to die!... And EVERYONE gets to die!" :P
@user-qd1qu2vt2z
@user-qd1qu2vt2z 23 күн бұрын
GS please make this happen!
@CJ-sx7lt
@CJ-sx7lt 23 күн бұрын
@@gibboau85 here’s one for you annnd one for you …..way in the back here ya go sweety 😁🤣✊🏼
@OhioCoastie94
@OhioCoastie94 23 күн бұрын
Imagine a C-5 loaded to the gills with these, playing missile truck for a formation of F-22s.
@toddcarter1086
@toddcarter1086 23 күн бұрын
"Could you please hold this AIM-174 for me?!"
@Kastev30
@Kastev30 23 күн бұрын
AIM-120 + AIM-54 = AIM-174 But unlike the AIM-54, the AIM-174 should be much more maneuverable and able to track fighters. Pretty neat that the Navy decided to cobble this together tbh. Should provide much more breathing room for fleet defense until the AIM-260 becomes fully operational.
@juanhoyos7793
@juanhoyos7793 23 күн бұрын
Whatt?? There is another one in oven???
@jean-francoistremblay143
@jean-francoistremblay143 23 күн бұрын
The 260 and 174 are going to complement each other. The 260 is limited by the fact that it need to fit in the bays of the f22/35.
@ObiWanShinobi917
@ObiWanShinobi917 23 күн бұрын
​@@pyronuke4768but they're much faster than AMRAAMs, so they have much more spare energy to bleed while still remaining lethal
@AschTheWolf
@AschTheWolf 23 күн бұрын
​@pyronuke4768 The missile doesn't even weigh 2000lbs. It's just over 1,800lbs. So it will have quite a bit of maneuverability
@opanasovych_svirid
@opanasovych_svirid 23 күн бұрын
Sm6 without launch buster weighs over 3000lb
@KTM55100
@KTM55100 23 күн бұрын
F-15 and those missiles would be unfair to everyone
@tomgreco
@tomgreco 23 күн бұрын
F15EX would be beautiful.
@josemorenoporras7506
@josemorenoporras7506 23 күн бұрын
yep I was thinking the same,F-15 radar with this weapon could be something else.
@oldfashionedwrx3574
@oldfashionedwrx3574 23 күн бұрын
@@josemorenoporras7506 modern super hornets have insane radars tho
@Pikilloification
@Pikilloification 23 күн бұрын
Why would you want it to be fair anyway?
@AdamFrisch1
@AdamFrisch1 23 күн бұрын
@@oldfashionedwrx3574Yeah but the F-15’s Radar can see into your soul 😂
@Orca19904
@Orca19904 23 күн бұрын
It should be noted this missile has been rated for use on the Super Hornet, not sure if the legacy Hornet is rated to carry this weapon. Also the max range of the missile is well beyond the max radar range of the Super Hornet, so it actually relies on other platforms to acquire targets for it and pass that targeting data to the launch aircraft.
@zachn5529
@zachn5529 23 күн бұрын
F35s will be 100 miles ahead of the supers just to use radar for them. Keeping the supers out of engagement distance and letting the stealth do its thing. Wild.
@Gentleman...Driver
@Gentleman...Driver 23 күн бұрын
I doubt that they would adapt this very large missile to the legacy hornets. Legacy hornets were faced out entirely from the US Navy. Last one was gone last year I think. The Superhornet is a much bigger aircraft.
@Chuck_Hooks
@Chuck_Hooks 23 күн бұрын
​@@zachn5529And that is one of the great strengths of F-35s. SM-6s are networked weapons, made to accept F-35 targeting information for targets potentially 200+ miles from airborne launch point. Would like to see this in DCS
@zelfersd
@zelfersd 23 күн бұрын
The Navy no longer has legacy Hornets in the operational fleet (still in some aggressor units), they have been entirely replaced by the Super Hornet and F-35C.
@Orca19904
@Orca19904 23 күн бұрын
@@Gentleman...Driver A lot of people are saying the AIM-174 is effectively the resurrection of the old AIM-54 from the F-14 Tomcat; a large, very long-range Fox 3 A2A missile intended to engage targets at standoff distances. Only difference is the AIM-174 wasn't built in conjunction with its launch platform like the Phoenix was.
@DrakePlayz0305
@DrakePlayz0305 23 күн бұрын
I was literally just reading about this missile and 10 minutes later GS makes a video about it 🤣
@GrowlingSidewinder
@GrowlingSidewinder 23 күн бұрын
We like to stay current around here.
@Acelafan2030
@Acelafan2030 23 күн бұрын
​@@GrowlingSidewinderGS did u see how fast the felon spun out when your missile hit I'm laughing so hard 🤣🤣🤣 that was funny to watch
@youngbloodhobby2103
@youngbloodhobby2103 22 күн бұрын
LMAO Saaaammeee
@VortexGaming175
@VortexGaming175 22 күн бұрын
@@Acelafan2030 yeah that was funny. i think the felon pilot threw up just a couple times lol!
@Acelafan2030
@Acelafan2030 22 күн бұрын
@@VortexGaming175 😂🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Registered_Simp
@Registered_Simp 23 күн бұрын
POV: The US Navy casually negating any and all range advantage any country may have held by strapping the most lethal Naval SAM in the world to a plane. Considering the SM-6 has a sea-launched range of ~230-250 miles (Granted, with a booster), we can safely assume that a 100 mile shot from high altitude with this thing would be simply trivial...
@Hot_Sky_Astronomy
@Hot_Sky_Astronomy 23 күн бұрын
I've seen all sorts of simulation makers claiming it could easily crest 400 miles under perfect conditions.
@PluralCHimera0
@PluralCHimera0 23 күн бұрын
@@Hot_Sky_Astronomy The problem with ranges like that isnt kinetic, its about having the power to keep the seeker head active for the ammount of time it would take to hit the target. Radars take a ton of power.
@shifyist
@shifyist 23 күн бұрын
Limiting factor will be radar, us military however is transitioning to any sensor theory so the future is a f18 shooting these from 300 miles while a f35 guides it until terminal
@Hot_Sky_Astronomy
@Hot_Sky_Astronomy 23 күн бұрын
@@shifyist Precisely, that or an Aegis-equipped destroyer is guiding them in.
@Hot_Sky_Astronomy
@Hot_Sky_Astronomy 23 күн бұрын
@@PluralCHimera0 I'd simply go for a passive/semi-active until-terminal approach then.
@AndyKraken
@AndyKraken 23 күн бұрын
The publicly listed range for these missiles is 150 nautical miles when launched from a ship (with a booster). When launched at 30k feet from an airplane going supersonic one can only guess how much that extends the range (theorized 200+ nmi). And it's carrying a 140 lb warhead. Extremely scary missile to face
@Godsjudgement12
@Godsjudgement12 23 күн бұрын
people speculate its north of 350km or 217 miles or so
@rogerbiggerstaff3293
@rogerbiggerstaff3293 11 күн бұрын
It's closer to 500km. Surface launched SM-6 have a 250 nautical mile range. Air launched will be even further.
@b3jamin21
@b3jamin21 23 күн бұрын
China and Russia: We out range you with missiles America: give me like one day, hold my beer, Phoenix baby is born
@heatblast876
@heatblast876 23 күн бұрын
Yeah, the US is still gonna lose why because Chinese and Russian have hypersonic missiles, which can easily be launched from very long ranges similar to AIM174B, but one biggest advantage its speed, which can give up to 5-7 mach, while AIM 174B can go upto only mach 4. So the US is still on the loss.
@DirectorBird
@DirectorBird 23 күн бұрын
Do you genuinly think we dont have a way to defeat those "hypersonic" missiles?​@@heatblast876
@ryanperry7956
@ryanperry7956 23 күн бұрын
@@heatblast876 Sorry dude, hypersonics air to air missiles (R-37Ms) are good and all, but if they are outranged by the AIM-174, their speed doesnt matter. Additionally, American radars are better so they can actually lock targets at the maximum range of the 174
@Big_Red_Dork
@Big_Red_Dork 23 күн бұрын
​@@heatblast876the R-37M is not designed to shoot down maneuvering fighters, it's meant for large planes like AWACS, Tankers, etc. These AIM-174C's are designed to engage almost all air threats, including maneuvering fighters jets, from long range. Different use case and 1v1 fighter vs fighter, the AIM-174C has much better probability to kill, based on publicly available data
@traviswalker8933
@traviswalker8933 23 күн бұрын
​@@Big_Red_Dorkthe AIM-174 wasn't designed to do anything. It's just a redesignation for a SAM missile which naturally can carry ordnance used to target maneuvering fighter jets.
@thefamilydogs3213
@thefamilydogs3213 23 күн бұрын
I would like to see it used with datalink. Have F-35's BVR fight and also guide these Aim-174Bs to separate targets. Include AWACS in the rear covering a fleet. I believe that would be their intended use.
@a36538
@a36538 23 күн бұрын
I’ve heard a 200 mile range, but who knows
@ryanperry7956
@ryanperry7956 23 күн бұрын
Thats what many are hypothesizing will be the strat, F-35s guiding missiles in from semi-close to targets while the hornets launch from range. I dont think 35s can carry a 174 without blowing their stealth
@herptek
@herptek 22 күн бұрын
​@@ryanperry7956If one really wants to make the fight still more unfair from there, one could arm the F-35 with AIM-260.
@PegasusTenma1
@PegasusTenma1 20 күн бұрын
Are you trying to create a monster?
@herptek
@herptek 20 күн бұрын
@@PegasusTenma1 Why the hell not?
@toothlessDJErcik
@toothlessDJErcik 23 күн бұрын
You should arm the F-15C/E/EX (EX would be the best) with AIM-174B and you should do BVR against MiG-31s ​​carrying R-37M asap lol
@42grath
@42grath 22 күн бұрын
He needs some revenge for those Mig-31 vs F-15 BVR fights lol
@toothlessDJErcik
@toothlessDJErcik 22 күн бұрын
@@42grath hell yeah
@VortexGaming175
@VortexGaming175 22 күн бұрын
@@toothlessDJErcik yeah GS to that please
@triumphdollysprint
@triumphdollysprint 22 күн бұрын
+1 for wanting to see this
@slate4687
@slate4687 22 күн бұрын
It s A Navy thang!
@rtpfixit
@rtpfixit 23 күн бұрын
SU-57: "I zee you have extra missile. Please may I hold?"
@nixet
@nixet 23 күн бұрын
F-18: Sure. Catch!
@atigerclaw
@atigerclaw 23 күн бұрын
@@nixet SU=57: "Vait, I vasn't vread-"
@TheHk1966
@TheHk1966 23 күн бұрын
@@atigerclawDidn’t know Russians spoke with a German accent
@johns1625
@johns1625 23 күн бұрын
@@atigerclaw Vladimir will be quite displeased with your inability to catch. Now he only has 1 Felon left, and it's a display model. 🤣🤣
@adissabovic
@adissabovic 23 күн бұрын
@@johns1625 Don't get high on your own supply, son.
@SmilingCamperVan-dd8cb
@SmilingCamperVan-dd8cb 23 күн бұрын
A Super Hornet pretending to be a Tomcat? Now I've seen everything!
@user-mf9ze9gl2m
@user-mf9ze9gl2m 23 күн бұрын
Das a regular hornet
@tuunaes
@tuunaes 21 күн бұрын
That's legacy Hornet. If C in designation doesn't tell it, round engine air intakes is the easiest physical differentiator.
@utley
@utley 23 күн бұрын
an AWACS datalink would absolutely be necessary to launch on those aircraft OTH as that missile was meant to do...hope I see it here today! that missile has over 200nm range, shooting that thing at 5k will still get you well outside his MAR. Oh, and BTW...AIM-54 + AIM120 = AIM174.
@slartybarfastb3648
@slartybarfastb3648 23 күн бұрын
I think the data link source will be F-35, not AWACS. This is the Navy adopting the USAF missile truck (F-15EX) team kill approach. Due to naval engagements ideally occurring far from the boat, Navy added legs to their team kill. F-35C snoops close in while F-18E/F/G pulls the trigger.
@geodkyt
@geodkyt 23 күн бұрын
​@@slartybarfastb3648This missile is designed to integrate into a CEC network. And the necessary CEC nodes get smaller all the time - you don't need an "Aegis" ship to be in there (even thoughbthats really what CEC was intended for originally) - quite a few later model E-2s are equipped for CEC, and it's used by several allied nations (and any of them can join an impromptu CEC network, almost on the fly). As an analogy, traditional AAMs and SAMs are like tank cannons- they fire on what their platform can see. RiM-174 and AIM-174 are like modern artillery - they can fire on whatever *anyone* in the net can see, even if it isn't a "fire control quality" track... atvworst, they just have to get the missile close enough to the target so the (based on, but larger *and better than* , the AMRAAM seeker) missile sensor can find the target.
@jmh1189
@jmh1189 23 күн бұрын
​@@geodkytI forgot the name, but it was supposed to also be supported by land based radar with a program meant to integrate assets from other branches the same way that cec allows for fire control data to be shared between ships.
@sovietbanana4589
@sovietbanana4589 23 күн бұрын
As much of a coincidence that the numbers are it’s not because of that. The sm-6’s designation is the rim-174.
@DonutGuard
@DonutGuard 23 күн бұрын
One of the few videos where GS goes true sniper mode. 1 shot, 1 kill. 4 Missiles, 4 Aircraft. One of which was a Gen 5.
@zachn5529
@zachn5529 23 күн бұрын
The navy has already stated these have been used on active deployments I’m pretty sure. They should be used in DCS more regularly.
@vaderlatino9924
@vaderlatino9924 23 күн бұрын
These missiles will be crazy. Hornet can missile truck for F-35, can pair with the AEGIS, can probably even use datalink from AWACS. SM-6 launches more like a ballistic missile, but unlike the Russian hypersonic, the SM-6 is actually maneuverable. I think the minimum range is going to be more tricky the max range. It’s going to be a crazy missile and with it being remade SM-6 the cost of development, the performance, and software are very mature. This missile is a major threat to Western Taiwan.
@scottcooper4391
@scottcooper4391 23 күн бұрын
DOn't you mean "FOR" western Taiwan ?
@lancesmokers8250
@lancesmokers8250 23 күн бұрын
@@scottcooper4391 Western Taiwan is the new name of china
@slartybarfastb3648
@slartybarfastb3648 23 күн бұрын
If you really want your mind blown...it can use Patriot PAC-3 radar and data link for guidance. So, the US Army could technically be getting air-to-air kills, using the Navy to deliver the missiles. F-18E/F/G could blind fire using Army radar to defend an Air Force base.
@slartybarfastb3648
@slartybarfastb3648 23 күн бұрын
​@@lancesmokers8250I prefer China being renamed Mainland Taiwan.
@lexwaldez
@lexwaldez 23 күн бұрын
The missiles datalink with AWACS, F-35, or Aegis. Think of a theatre with F-22's and F-35's up front, F-15's or F-18's dumping missiles from 100+ miles away with the F-35 coordinating the attack. Ridiculous.
@doyoulikefries668
@doyoulikefries668 23 күн бұрын
12:30 Aileron rolls straight to hell
@tomgreco
@tomgreco 23 күн бұрын
Lawn dart!
@scopedog9197
@scopedog9197 23 күн бұрын
Love it.
@DriveCarToBar
@DriveCarToBar 23 күн бұрын
Aerospace version of a speed wobble on a skateboard.
@ObiWanShinobi917
@ObiWanShinobi917 23 күн бұрын
SU-57 got absolutely smoked. That pilot had chance to eject
@nero756
@nero756 10 күн бұрын
"wheeeeeeee"
@mattdill8090
@mattdill8090 23 күн бұрын
Can we put these missiles on a F-14 please
@CajunMarine33445
@CajunMarine33445 23 күн бұрын
A wall of Eagles with the AIM174B would be unstoppable
@roijoi6963
@roijoi6963 22 күн бұрын
Not quite unstoppable, as they can still be hit. Since Eagles aren't very stealthy (2.5 the RCS of a B1-b bomber) an old 4th Gen fighter could defeat a wall of Eagles forced to fly at tree-top level if the 4th Gen were firing at high speeds and from high altitudes downhill at the Eagles. This could be a scenario where the Eagles were under SAM threat and terrain masking. A Mig-31 firing the R-77M could successfully engage a wall of Eagles in such a scenario. It would still offer the Eagles the best chance of success, but they would still have to defend such a threat.
@slate4687
@slate4687 22 күн бұрын
AIM 174 is a Navy thang!
@fugu5162
@fugu5162 21 күн бұрын
A6 intruder payload often quoted as 18,000lb
@fugu5162
@fugu5162 21 күн бұрын
aim 174b 1,890 lb ea
@fugu5162
@fugu5162 21 күн бұрын
nevermind: super hornet same as A6 (~17000 lbs)
@mkaverage1791
@mkaverage1791 23 күн бұрын
It will be interesting to see how this missile's air-to-ground performance compares to the AMRAAM...
@TonymanCS
@TonymanCS 23 күн бұрын
It has secondary role of a AShM missile. 64kg of blast-frag is not much but still more than AMRAAM's warhead for sure.
@geodkyt
@geodkyt 23 күн бұрын
Well, the parent missile (which has the same basic aerodynamics, aside from launch altitude and speed being higher, obviously) has the same warhead and guidance, and is a highly regarded weapon for surface to surface modes... won't sink a cruiser or the like, but can pick off fast moving and maneuvering surface targets like, say Iran uses. I'd even say its usefulnagainst small corvettes, and even larger ones if they are festooned with external ordnance like Soviet style missile attack boats.
@PapaOscarNovember
@PapaOscarNovember 23 күн бұрын
Supposedly, they killed a retired marine assault ship using this missile at the latest RIMPAC exercise.
@corystansbury
@corystansbury 23 күн бұрын
​​​@@PapaOscarNovember They also sank a frigate with one in a previous SINKEX (Reuben James in 2016)
@Spydr6684
@Spydr6684 23 күн бұрын
12:57 HOLY!!! That was probably the most violent kill ever! Didn’t look like there was even a remote possibility of ejection there.
@HowlingPhantom
@HowlingPhantom 23 күн бұрын
The phoenix missiles son
@Joey-tc2uo
@Joey-tc2uo 23 күн бұрын
exactly this is if they put a Amraam seeker on a Phoenix
@Mike_Romeo
@Mike_Romeo 23 күн бұрын
120 + 54 = 174
@coachwilson5967
@coachwilson5967 23 күн бұрын
​@@Mike_Romeoyou broke the code !!!
@willwozniak2826
@willwozniak2826 23 күн бұрын
Anybody have an idea on top speed?....
@shanemonsees4798
@shanemonsees4798 23 күн бұрын
@@Joey-tc2uo More like they took the Charlie variant Pheonix seeker and slapped it onto a Sparrow to make the AMRAAM. :)
@derekwright3239
@derekwright3239 23 күн бұрын
Thank you for making this video. I was going to ask you today!!!
@Spartan536
@Spartan536 23 күн бұрын
It's an SM-6 (Standard Missile 6) from the US Navy a very deadly surface to air missile that is now an Air to Air missile. Fun fact while the AIM-174B outranges the F/A-18's RADAR system the US Military already thought of that and has implemented multiple systems to make it a non-issue. This not so new yet new missile is currently giving China and Russia fits, Russia will never admit it but they are rightfully terrified of the AIM-174B.
@immikeurnot
@immikeurnot 23 күн бұрын
Has a surface-to-surface antiship mode, too. I wonder if that mode still works for air-launch.
@Spartan536
@Spartan536 23 күн бұрын
@@immikeurnot Knowing the US Navy, I am willing to bet it does
@andersjjensen
@andersjjensen 23 күн бұрын
@@Spartan536 I wouldn't even blink if they told me it can go after submarines at periscope depth...
@aflyingcowboy31
@aflyingcowboy31 22 күн бұрын
@@immikeurnot They are saying it is completely multi-role i.e. anti-ship, anti-plane and can be used against ground targets, also makes me wonder, with how the aegis system and F35 work, it should have the capability to also take out missiles too. The AIM-174 seems like it is gonna be an extremely useful missile.
@dualtronix4438
@dualtronix4438 22 күн бұрын
@@aflyingcowboy31 It should. The SM-6 is supposed to be able to hit cruise missiles, reentry hypersonics and just about a lot of other stuff
@Agiselaus
@Agiselaus 23 күн бұрын
"Helicopter helicopter ..." - SU-57 in death spin
@Rexmandell
@Rexmandell 23 күн бұрын
Gee Willikers son, where'd ya find this?
@michaelmatthews1127
@michaelmatthews1127 23 күн бұрын
That missile hit the Felon so hard physics wasnt even sure what to do
@foczastafomka5502
@foczastafomka5502 23 күн бұрын
i feel like a super hornet with the AIM-174 vs an F-22 with AIM-120Ds BVR fight would be interesting, see if the huge range advantage can help defeat stealth
@Mike_Romeo
@Mike_Romeo 23 күн бұрын
How is range supposed to help when the F-22 doesnt even show up on radar ?
@SuperSabre157
@SuperSabre157 23 күн бұрын
Man, that missile hit the 57 so hard it got confused and spun itself into the ground to recover
@ChrisMoseley-h3s
@ChrisMoseley-h3s 23 күн бұрын
Excellent. Hard to believe there's already a DCS version of this!
@profacecreator3810
@profacecreator3810 23 күн бұрын
@@pyronuke4768 sm-2*
@Chuck_Hooks
@Chuck_Hooks 23 күн бұрын
AIM-174Bs vs. Chinese surface ships next please.
@ziepex7009
@ziepex7009 23 күн бұрын
interesting
@Chuck_Hooks
@Chuck_Hooks 23 күн бұрын
​@@ziepex7009SM-6s have an anti-ship capability.
@ziepex7009
@ziepex7009 22 күн бұрын
@@Chuck_Hooks interesting
@Xaunoki
@Xaunoki 23 күн бұрын
That Su-57 pilot never had a chance to punch out. His guts were all over the canopy with how hard that thing was spinning into the ground lol
@TonymanCS
@TonymanCS 23 күн бұрын
It also suck for him his RCS was that of a...Super Hornet.
@heatblast876
@heatblast876 23 күн бұрын
TonymanCS, there is an RCS model that has been done on the SU57. Go on, quora, name Jack, what is the RCS of SU57.
@heatblast876
@heatblast876 23 күн бұрын
​TonymanCS, also, you're all spreading face information. What you're saying is old. The newer version of SU57, which is serial production, has the RCS around 0.015m2 with open IRST sensor, while in full stealth configuration it has the RCS 0.006m2 with close IRST sensor.
@Reaver3214
@Reaver3214 23 күн бұрын
​@heatblast876 uhuh do have you sources for that or it came to you in vodka fueled Russian delusion of grandeur dreams?
@entropy11
@entropy11 23 күн бұрын
spun so hard he glitched out
@AtticusMoreno-oy6nd
@AtticusMoreno-oy6nd 23 күн бұрын
F22/35 and these missiles would be a combo to rival the F14 and its Phoenix missiles.
@studlyhungwell5740
@studlyhungwell5740 22 күн бұрын
You are a one man Air Force-- Two Flankers, a Felon, and a heavy Bomber Now it's Miller time 😅
@_2GUD4U
@_2GUD4U 23 күн бұрын
Why the Su-57 spin like that at 12:30 😵‍💫😵‍💫
@DCobra98
@DCobra98 23 күн бұрын
That was a nasty auger in. No chute that I could see, probably too many G's to punch out
@andersjjensen
@andersjjensen 23 күн бұрын
Physics engine went a little nuts. Hitting an Su-57 hard enough to make it spin like that does not result in an intact Su-57 that can actually do the spinning.
@greatBLT
@greatBLT 23 күн бұрын
The lore reason is that the AIM-174's warhead is more than three times the weight of the AIM-120's
@joshuamattingly1232
@joshuamattingly1232 22 күн бұрын
@@greatBLTso basically it Hadookened it so hard it began spinning.
@2020Max1
@2020Max1 23 күн бұрын
So they essentially are strapping SM-6's onto Hornets....
@geodkyt
@geodkyt 23 күн бұрын
Using the AIM-174B in NIFC-CA (a BVR/OTH capability usable in a CEC network) mode will be interesting. NIFC-CA can make "synthetic" target locks that provide fire control quality tracks that are passed to the missile, without any actual fire control radar lock, by fusing multiple fuzzier "search" tracks into a position of high accuracy. Think of a Venn diagram in 3D, with the spheres being the "accuracy bubbles" of each radar track - get enough of them and the area where they all agree the target can be inside gets really small. You can literally shoot from "ATC" data... if you have enough data points. This, combined with high accuracy LPI radars on stealthy aircraft , and the fact that any weapons platform in a CEC network can fire on any target any other CEC sensor (or group of sensors in combination) can provide accurate enough data to get the missile to pitbull, and you really see where the US is going. And it works *better* with these 4th Gen fighters carrying the long range missiles while stealthier platforms or "surveillance" assets (none of which even need to be armed for the NIFC-CA shoot) bird dogging and designating the target... often without the target even realizing it is being "painted" (because it isn't being illuminated with fire control radars). The 4th Gen "missile truck" can stand back *behind* the 5th Gen "forward observers", and pump missiles in (because the launching platforms aren't actually guiding them directly and don't need to maintain their own locks).
@sorryociffer
@sorryociffer 23 күн бұрын
It also has a BIG warhead for an A2A missile...
@drksideofthewal
@drksideofthewal 23 күн бұрын
It can be used against ships. Just an anti-everything weapon.
@bagelmaster2498
@bagelmaster2498 21 күн бұрын
It’s pretty much a US r37m or a phoenix jr.
@jf895
@jf895 23 күн бұрын
I think you were not getting a lock with the boresight, because of your PRF mode. If I remember correctly, you want to be on HIGH anytime the target is further than 21 miles, and MED if they are within.
@Delta36A1
@Delta36A1 23 күн бұрын
Considering that based on the picture taken by AEROS808 the AIM-174 weighs1,890 lbs (857.2896 kg) while the R-37M weighs 1,120 lbs (510 kg) and they have around the same warhead weight I would imagine that the AIM-174 would likely have superior kinematic performance compared to the R-37M. It would definitely make an interesting video to pit the DCS versions against each other.
@pale_2111
@pale_2111 23 күн бұрын
I've seen an article posted by Marine Corps Times that the missile (AIM-174) was cleared by the Navy to use on the Super Hornet. Just imagine that the Air Force straps some on an F-15EX.
@shanebarenblatt1925
@shanebarenblatt1925 23 күн бұрын
F-15 armed with aim-174s vs MiG 31 armed with r-37ms
@acftmxman
@acftmxman 23 күн бұрын
GS it has been reported that the seeker on the AIM174B has been upgraded so that its terminal guidance can get updates from E-3’s, E-2C’s and even Fat Amy’s. It’s basically a SAM6 with an upgraded seeker. The AIM174B is also reported to do both air-to-air and air-to-ground prosecution of targets.
@that_crazy_serb
@that_crazy_serb 23 күн бұрын
I was wondering when this one is coming man 🎯
@Ninjasimpmunk
@Ninjasimpmunk 23 күн бұрын
Love to see an F-18 E/F using this vs Rafael or typhoon using meteor missiles
@BladeKi11a
@BladeKi11a 23 күн бұрын
Still waiting for GS to drop the BF3 F-18 mission “Going Hunting”
@MeerkatADV
@MeerkatADV 23 күн бұрын
An SM-2 is a scary missile anyway, to put it on a Super Hornet, F22, F35, or even an Eagle should be absolutely terrifying.
@MeerkatADV
@MeerkatADV 23 күн бұрын
@tbe0116 sorry yes, SM-2 body though.
@weasle2904
@weasle2904 22 күн бұрын
SM3. And it won't fit inside a F-35 or F-22, that's what the AIM-260 will be for.
@every56days
@every56days 23 күн бұрын
Just watched Ward’s video on this missile and was hoping for something like this. My brother. ❤
@kalbs89
@kalbs89 23 күн бұрын
I've been waiting for this, thanks
@jatpack3
@jatpack3 23 күн бұрын
This missile is specifically strapped to the super hornet to challenge the PLA
@ChrisMoseley-h3s
@ChrisMoseley-h3s 23 күн бұрын
One of the ancestors of this missile was the SM-2 Standard Missile, used by AEGIS cruisers.
@zachn5529
@zachn5529 23 күн бұрын
It quite literally is a modified SM2 for airborne launches.
@TheBillyBlack
@TheBillyBlack 23 күн бұрын
No. It’s a stock SM-6 with swapped out seeker.
@Kieselmeister
@Kieselmeister 23 күн бұрын
​@@TheBillyBlackthe SM-6 is a modified SM-2. The AIM-174 being a modified SM-6 makes it a modified modified SM-2.
@RRex_501
@RRex_501 23 күн бұрын
Pls fly the Eurofighter with Meteors
@brianwright9514
@brianwright9514 23 күн бұрын
AIM-174b (SM-6) can track by Data Link, BTW. No need for launch aircraft to use radar lock
@drewm4914
@drewm4914 23 күн бұрын
I would love to see a video of this on a Super Hornet vs a MiG-31 with R-37s.
@FoxFire2736
@FoxFire2736 23 күн бұрын
Another great vid! You gave me all of my knowledge of aircraft and tactics and fed a new passion for aviation. Thank you so much
@coreymeh8335
@coreymeh8335 23 күн бұрын
Should try anti ballistic missile scenario's with this, see how good an air launched variant can do for fleet or island defence
@RynerGT
@RynerGT 23 күн бұрын
I petition to call it aim 174b "rising Phoenix", that or "burning phoenix". Anyway, we all know what it should be used with. *mighty wings starts playing with an F14 montage*
@rickmellor
@rickmellor 23 күн бұрын
Four shots, four kills. Death machine, indeed!
@flompen
@flompen 23 күн бұрын
So many things to love here, especially Art the Clown xD -- regarding the AIM-174, try to shoot these at max range / far out on various targets from various planes, including the Super Hornet / Datalink.
@trplankowner3323
@trplankowner3323 23 күн бұрын
As for scenarios, how about something close to what the missile is intended to do defending a carrier battle group or Marine Corps landing near Taiwan.
@ArcaneActual
@ArcaneActual 23 күн бұрын
I heard about all this news today, and who pulled out the video for it..... MY FUCKING DAWG!
@rncm86
@rncm86 23 күн бұрын
The AIM-174B to the SU57 is like what happened to the upside down blonde chick that Art the Clown sawn in half.
@PhantomP63
@PhantomP63 23 күн бұрын
Seeing a Standard derivative on a Hornet instantly brings to mind the Vietnam-era AGM-78 as used on the A-6 and F-105.
@ditzydoo4378
@ditzydoo4378 23 күн бұрын
the SM-6 that the Aim 174B is based on is a deadly SAM. It was the boost phase that is the limiting factor. But here that is all but eliminated... like the enemy. ^~^
@keithhoss4990
@keithhoss4990 23 күн бұрын
An F-14 can successfully take out 2 out 4 SU-57’s. That’s red meat.
@roman335i
@roman335i 23 күн бұрын
🤣🤡
@SonOfAB_tch2ndClass
@SonOfAB_tch2ndClass 23 күн бұрын
“It’s not the plane it’s the pilot.”
@KeithKnoesel
@KeithKnoesel 23 күн бұрын
@@SonOfAB_tch2ndClass You better believe it Rooster
@fightingparamecium9605
@fightingparamecium9605 23 күн бұрын
Thank you
@PhilS0341
@PhilS0341 20 күн бұрын
9:07. Not sure where you are, but that external tank landed in my front yard and you owe me for damages to my vehicle.
@slow5x5
@slow5x5 23 күн бұрын
That was so Cool!! Nice Job!!
@bblvrable
@bblvrable 23 күн бұрын
That range could be exceptionally frightening on an F-15 Strike Eagle. Massive number of hard points and that powerful radar, no one's hiding from it.
@user-mm1nt1it5v
@user-mm1nt1it5v 23 күн бұрын
Especially if they keep the booster on for the f15!
@themuaddib
@themuaddib 23 күн бұрын
It's not the plane. It's not the pilot. It's the missle.
@shaunkennedy3916
@shaunkennedy3916 21 күн бұрын
Always a great video! Much appreciated sir.
@AeroSlaughter
@AeroSlaughter 23 күн бұрын
Neat! - the guy who snapped it in hnl :D
@joshuamcdonald5621
@joshuamcdonald5621 23 күн бұрын
Lets goooooo new GS video
@Mike_Romeo
@Mike_Romeo 23 күн бұрын
Aim-174 vs Meteor missile
@bolohakuna5854
@bolohakuna5854 23 күн бұрын
legacy hornets have been pictured carrying SM-6s during testing, Would be interesting to see one go up against an su35 with the R37M
@brandonboudreau235
@brandonboudreau235 22 күн бұрын
That missle absolutely delivers that hate on impact. Might be the most violent missle I've seen on your channel.
@murph3194
@murph3194 23 күн бұрын
MAN the 57 went down hard. Let's see you strap the AIM-174B to the most inferior fighter that can hold it and go up against some hypersonic missiles. lol Just to see what happens.
@revolverswitch
@revolverswitch 23 күн бұрын
No... Otherwise everyone will realize the still untapped potential of the f-14
@tombooker13
@tombooker13 23 күн бұрын
Imagine how powerful an F15 carrying 8 of these babies would be 😂 Armageddon!!
@tombooker13
@tombooker13 22 күн бұрын
@@pyronuke4768 yup was thinking SE 👍
@CJ-sx7lt
@CJ-sx7lt 23 күн бұрын
Two part request 1) I would love to see the tacview for the speeds at impact 🤯😁2) I’d like to see you on other side defending against it🎉🎉 nothing but luv bruda keep the awesome content coming ❤
@sykogrupycocanekrzy
@sykogrupycocanekrzy 23 күн бұрын
Loved the meme usage upon the Felon arrival 😂😂😂
@steve390gold
@steve390gold 23 күн бұрын
AIM174 on the darkstar!!! 80k feet at mach 5 launch parameters!! 300+ mile range!!!
@walterplentis3989
@walterplentis3989 23 күн бұрын
So cool you made this video so quick!
@Neushoorn63
@Neushoorn63 22 күн бұрын
This was the most fun I've had all year. Nice work.
@excorsis
@excorsis 23 күн бұрын
I would like to see su-35 with R-37 vs super hornet with aim174b
@j4s0n39
@j4s0n39 23 күн бұрын
The RNE of that missile exceeds the radar of the Rhino. It's even better with AWACS or F-35s providing targets. Also, those elements can provide guidance, so the Rhino could fire and turn around.
@jwilliams703
@jwilliams703 23 күн бұрын
Hell that missile could make a P-38 relevant in a fight today.
@TheJuggtron
@TheJuggtron 22 күн бұрын
Bring back the Missileer
@steveferst6882
@steveferst6882 23 күн бұрын
the slash on the SU 57 was so violent
@LDSG_A_Team
@LDSG_A_Team 23 күн бұрын
Somehow I knew you'd be using these sometime soon.
@hankarmstrong3681
@hankarmstrong3681 16 күн бұрын
I have many hours now in MSFS & Top Mach Studios F-22 Raptor. I'll be 80 years old when I learn what GS knows about Modern Air Combat. Who'd a thunk it? I need a Simulator Flight Instructor?
@Waltham1892
@Waltham1892 23 күн бұрын
I remember when they were talking about hanging AIM-7's on an the F-16. Well, hold my damn beer!
@istvanbarta
@istvanbarta 21 күн бұрын
"I wonder how that felt" for the bomber POV when the Hornet was almost a hundred miles away, but suddenly a warhead cut the wing down :D
@chrisg7551
@chrisg7551 23 күн бұрын
Was waiting for this video!
@SEBY2626
@SEBY2626 18 күн бұрын
the way you casually say "95 miles, fox 3" is insane
@ttrestle
@ttrestle 22 күн бұрын
That Su-57 Felon pop up scare made me laugh. Love your vids man. Been sharing them with my brother and he’s now a sub too.
@mr.smallberries6477
@mr.smallberries6477 21 күн бұрын
Hey, GS! Awesome video, as always. Might I suggest for the next video on these to use the AIM-178 the way they are intended. Create a flight of F-18s to act as missile trucks laden with the AIM-178. Accompany that with a flight of F-35s to designate the targets and lead the resulting wall of missiles in. Complete fifth generation chaos!
@broadstbulliesii
@broadstbulliesii 22 күн бұрын
been waiting for this one 💪
@mustezdcs6329
@mustezdcs6329 23 күн бұрын
Saw a pic the other day uploaded to facebook wishing someone can make it happen , thanks heaps
@eddievedderisbedder
@eddievedderisbedder 23 күн бұрын
Bro the fact that the 174b was still burning at 18 miles is craaaaazy lol
@demariomontague27
@demariomontague27 23 күн бұрын
Great sorting! Yes to the legacy Hornet and the Mig-31 along with other scenarios!!! Salute!
НЫСАНА КОНЦЕРТ 2024
2:26:34
Нысана театры
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
America's race to field new air-to-air missiles
20:01
Sandboxx
Рет қаралды 803 М.
Pilot Refuses to Land
17:49
74 Gear
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
Inside the B-17 Ball Turret
18:59
Blue Paw Print
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
skibidi toilet 76 (full episode)
8:11
DaFuq!?Boom!
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН