Really? So much for an not ending, let alone the end of the war, don’t you think that at least warrants a little celebration?

@@SuperMoviemaster21 Of course they could celebrate but have you seen people coming back from a war? Most people don't celebrate, they're still in shock and can't believe that it's over. They have to process things

@@Rathian03 Still though, they did it in the book after all :-) they could’ve at least had a reasonable use of both, as opposed to the overall movie being way too mopey, and dark to the point we literally cannot see a freaking thing!!!!!!!!! Which even worse is when it inspired literally most other movies to have their movies be horribly and abysmally coloured, Some even worse than what this abomination inspired for them, because it did so well, everyone else thought it had to copy it because everyone apparently for whatever psychotic reason liked it……

​@@Rathian03 when did you see people coming back from a war? Lol talking like an expert. STFU!

@@SuperMoviemaster21I like the tone of the movie with it being sad and dreadful, this is the deathly hallows after all. But the color in this movie was godawful. Really the movies went headfirst into this color washed effect after Azkaban

Lets make it 3-

I like that modification of films

I mean yeah realizing the person you hated was protecting you all this time. Even if it wasn’t for Harry but more for his mother that still saying a lot

I just realized that too! Never clicked with me how significant that was till now

and then moved it out of the inventory and, when prompted, wrote DELETE

Fr

TBF, the wand wasn't Voldemort's in the first place 😅

*loot

Yeah. But I always felt like they should’ve at least let him keep the wand. IMO, I always felt like they didn’t do a good job of showing Harry’s power progression, because everything that he’s learned was really more advanced. Not really something dangerous that only he can do. I would’ve liked it if they had followed the anime style of power progression, to show us just how powerful Harry has become.

and Dumbledore sitting in the corner laughing silently

​@@_jojo_joestar_Its stated Voldemort pushed magic further

😂 Yeah It’s Correct

@@VishnuStarLight😊

True 😂

Maybe they were spelled to stay on his face and not break?

Writers' wizardry

Bro was like "THIS IS HOW WE DID IT BACK AT THE ORPHANAGE"

We will use the old ways then

Tom: I ran out of magic, but not out of options

😂

Having seen his avada kedavra failed twice, he should have just gone with "accio desert eagle!"

@@Th0ughtf0rce *Voldemort used bitch slap* Harry:What spell was that? Voldemort:It’s called these Hands you wanker!

​@@Th0ughtf0rce😂😂😂😂

The backhand b**c* slap was a very nice touch

as in, he had nothing human left inside, just a monstrous magical construct, filled with nothing but dark magic, hate and fear

Old Man Riddle?

You can't use magic if you have no soul. The wand flipped to the only living person it saw.

@@cadenrolland5250 yeah i understand that, yet ignoring the technicisms of how magic work i think the movie’s ending also works

Honestly, I like the movie death better because his entire life Voldemort was never a man he was a monster so he deserved to die like one he acted so much like a monster when he became a monster and then dies the monster never a man

😂 So true

Vol: CATCH THESE HANDS BOY!!!

Harry Potter and the 5 Fingers of Pimp Hands

Youuu 😂😂😂😔

That’s because 13 is an unlucky number!

Same

0:17 😂👎🏽

Good catch I never would have noticed that, but now that I have it sort of adds to the world building. Feels like more of a battle, like this wasn’t just some completely empty building

props to that student

@@AnthonyLeachman-sc6es completely wrong timestamp but okay.

​@@XP-nt9iywhat's the right one

thats why mans resorted to the good ole fashion throwing hands lol

Yup the same feeling when we fail to kill a cockroach😂

@mdjunad5771 0:04 Voldy be like: WTFF dude!??

bob patiño

He said “why do you live” so calmly xd i would’ve been like “wtf why the hell are you alive!?!?!?!”

Personally I prefer how he dies in the book. Because it shows despite being an evil dark lord he was still a human being.

Nah, the books was better. He had a body and died

@@bigwagon6727 And people were present to witness the finale! That's a major point of the story

The book version was more preferrable imo. His body dropped over. Despite all his efforts to escape his mortality, in the end, he was just another human and died like one

Voldermod is god

Let’s finish this the way we started……TOGETHER!!!!!!!

@@jessedellross3245 instant chills

i believe he just called him Tom i don't think ive heard him called Voldemort yet

wow that's a really great insight so interesting!

Literal fog of war.

@simonpierre76 JUST like real war. Oftentimes you don’t know where the enemy is hiding. That’s why armies used to send Scouts to look for the enemy army’s location. Sometimes the enemy would suddenly appear without warning .

Also too, he can no longer sense where he is

The 7th book did this whole war insane for my brain and it was an epic war. I wish the movie just copy and pasted.... but no =(

@@leandroagonzalez3 If I’m remembering correctly, he was also the one who rallied reinforcements and brought them to the second phase of the battle. What a good man

@@leandroagonzalez3Movie made some questionable decisions. Like why cut out Fred’s death scene entirely and just show his corpse? If anything I was hoping the movie would show MORE than the book, like the deaths of Lupin and Tonks maybe, considering it was a 2 part movie and movies have more freedom to show scenes away from the protagonist whereas books have to stay centered on Harry. Instead, they added that weird scene of Neville soloing 200 Death Eaters through pure luck which was… interesting. Still a great movie regardless.

@@SJ-di5zu the one part of the movie battle I preferred was Neville killing Nagini during Harry’s duel with Voldemort. In the book Neville killed Nagini before Harry jumped out of Hagrid’s arms and cast a spell to prove he was still alive. It makes way more sense for Harry to use his mastery of the Elder Wand to finish off Voldemort once and for all the moment Harry realizes he has that opportunity

I missed the dialogue between Harry and Voldy. You don't learn do you Riddle, you dare, yes I dare. That would have been cool.

😂😂😂

🤣

But instead we got this over the top Hollywood garbage

@@nathanrudd2327never complaining, this was perfect

@@Alexander-wq7qo the book ending was perfect

who the hell cares which ending they used? they're both perfect in their own ways.

I think how Voldemort died and turned to ash while suffering showed us his fate worse then death was well done. But I still wished the battle was like in the books.

He really isn't if you read the books. He has some natural ability, but overall he's a pretty mediocre wizard. Almost all of his victories are attributed to luck or to forces more powerful than himself

@@jordanashton5879 I mean you arent wrong but if you think about it....none of them are. Ignoring plot armor, no actual student (even a 7th year) should be able to stand against a death eater, a fully grown wizard with more magical knowledge and killing intent (only so far disarming, protrego and stupefy could get you lol). What I think the comment is referencing is that Harry is naturally stronger than his peers in terms of strength....the reason why he hasn't shown any consistent displays of that ability is because he is after all, still a teenager and hasn't had the chance to fully you know realize his potential ....but i mean fighting off like 100 dementors with a corporeal patronous at 13 is no normal feat (i am assuming...i'm no wizard haha). The books paint a better picture of showing each of the golden trio's strengths and weakness. I haven't been updated with the canon is ages but didn't he become head auror (source was Pottermore I believe, don't even know if thats still a thing haha).

@@jordanashton5879 More powerful than average, but ofc he was not able to compare with great wizards. Without Voldemort powers within, he fought with death eaters, and thanks to other characters, he possess wide spectrum of magical knowledge. He was lucky, that great wizards was near him and improves his own power, abilities and knowledge. His father was powerful wizard, his mother also(knowledge and ability to use very old protection magic). Mediocre wizards cant do that.

Those aren't killing curses Voldemort is throwing, they are less powerful curses. The Killing Curse cannot be blocked, deflected, shielded or survived in any way (apart from Lily Potter's love)

​@sagesigman8269 isnt according to the books where the fight between Dumbledore and voldemord. Dumbledore took statues to block the killing curse. Thus kinda like deflected or blocked in a way ?

Yes Voldemort was killed by the wand, not harry .

It wouldn't be murder anyway. Murder is unlawful. The killing of voldemort is self defense and justice. Harry's soul wouldn't have split from killing voldemort, if people were wondering so.

Bro 😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂😂

@Chabowbie THIS castle has seen several battles or wars. The adults tend to be silent & not tell the kids .

The castle has seen bloodshed stretching back centuries

@@electrictroy2010 I like the "stretching" you used because that's exactly what harry and Voldemort

I see 3 hers in this scene. Which do you mean? (Also the reactions don’t seem like anything special.)

@@electrictroy2010 Hermione is the most prominent

@viniciusoliveraa THE snake was still alive, so Voldemort was still immortal when he crash-landed & bleeding. Also having horcruxes doesn’t give unlimited damage. You body can still die… but your soul survives (in the horcruxes) to be reincarnated (like Voldemort did) .

I actually prefer Harry snapping the Elder Wand instead of leaving it where it had already been stolen and making the first wizard to disarm Harry of his wand the master of the Elder Wand

@@CraigMcGuinn My point is, how do you PHYSICALLY break a legendary wand imbued with extraordinarily powerful magic? That thing has withstood the test of time for hundreds of years without showing signs of wear and tear, and all it takes is the strength of a lanky teenage boy to snap it in half? Doesn't make any sense to me. Also, the wand saved Harry from Voldemort. TWICE. It is the primary reason he won the war. To destroy it after it's all over just seems... ungrateful? Especially when the wand is implied to have some degree of sentience. Your reasoning does makes sense though. Harry shouldn't destroy the wand (simply because it should be INDESTRUCTIBLE by default) but he can't just put it on the headmaster's desk and leave. He still has the responsibility to protect it (or, as Dumbledore stated, to protect others from it) until the day he dies.

⁠@@abohsukampretsimple. because no one ever attempted to. Considering Harry was the true master of the elder wand at the end, it makes sense how he was able to snap it in half.

​@@abohsukampretI mean it is JUST a stick, and he's the Master of it.

@@abohsukampret Even if Harry Potter went on to protect others from the Elder Wand while he remained its true master until the day he died: wouldn’t the first wizard to find the Elder Wand after Harry’s death become the new master of the Elder Wand? As Ollivander told Harry Potter in his own shop before Harry even set foot in Hogwarts for the first time: the wizard doesn’t choose the wand, the wand chooses the wizard. So why would that principle not apply to the Elder Wand if its previous master died without another wizard killing or disarming them?

Underrated comment

@@kenzie_abqarys Overused joke

Voldermort could have killed Harry 3 times but decided to just push and throw him Just to get Harry to lure him to an edge and jump off with him

Actually: Harry won his duel with Voldemort after Nagini was killed by Neville because Harry was the true master of the Elder Wand. Therefore the Elder Wand refused to kill its true master and Voldemort’s killing curse rebounded back onto him as a result

@CraigMcGuinn and they never really talked or showed that in the movie did they? ... The movies were good up to goblet of fire

@@leandroagonzalez3actually: Harry explained to Ron and Hermoine how he was the true master of the Elder Wand in the final scene before the “17 years later” part

I think his beef is more so that he doesnt die,and the prophecy says one of them must die

Hhhhhhh LOL

Yes, i just wish it was more as my favorite fight, Voldemort VS Dumbledore in the order of the Phoenix movie.

Imo thats Anakin vs Obi Wan. But this one is my No.2 for always

@@joelvalencia6738Harry's magical capability is very lacking for that kind of confrontation, his style is more bread and butter; reflexes and strong will combined with a stronger than average grasp of basic dueling spells

The one part of the movie version I prefer is Neville destroying Nagini during Harry and Voldemort’s duel to make Voldmort mortal. In the book: Neville destroys Nagini before Harry jumps out of Hagrid’s arms and casts a spell to prove he’s alive

Also he pretty much lectures Voldemort before killing him, calling him “Tom,” telling him Snape never served him after he killed Lily, how the Elder Wand belonged to Harry, not him, and telling Voldemort to just show some remorse.

No, plenty of people realize it because book readers like yourself won’t shut the f*ck up about it and tell everyone about it first chance they get. Look, I won’t say the movie version is superior to the book by any means but let’s stop pretending the book version is some perfect peak conclusion. Amongst a myriad of other things, the fact that everyone just stands around and watches Voldemort and Harry chat is absurdly stupid.

Visually it wouldn't hv been good

Personally, I like both in their own ways. A single stroke duel like in the book was fitting, but a lot of people don't appreciate that sort of thing when it goes on a screen (e.g. Maul's final duel in Star Wars Rebels); they often felt it too anticlimactic. One of those nuances between a book and a screen that makes adapting one to the other difficult, really. Sure, the movie version of the final duel was not perfect, but I enjoyed it for what it is; same with the book version. They fit their respective mediums enough, IMO.

Nope. People who only watched movies don’t know a lot of stuff. Like in order of Phoenix - the talk between Dumbledore and Harry which explains like everything - if only to the movie, I would have no idea what all of this was about. The movies are so stupid. I am actually waiting for this new things. Maybe the books will be more respected.

​@@Ant802Or you expect too much. you can't put every detail from a book into a movie, there's time and schedule issues that can prevent it. And besides, the movies can handle certain things a lot better than the books.

​@@liamgreat8024 Not to mention that it is incredibly difficult to dump that much exposition without, well, dumping a lot of exposition. It's a limitation of the media, which in itself forces different and creative approaches. I admit I'm one of those that had only watched the movies when these came out and I didn't quite understood that whole "Elder wand ownership" deal or that even related to the fact that the spell rebounds and it's what actually kills Voldemort. I had assumed it was him being weakened after Nigiri dies, which might be what the filmmakers were actually going for.

Sure they do. Harry literally explains it to Ron and Hermoine on the bridge later.

@@Ant802 Harry Potter book readers, LotR book readers, y'all are all the same. Books and movies are two different medians. If you tried to squeeze every detail from a book into a movie, that movie would be 12 hours long. The movies were great, you can keep your books and continue being disappointed by movies not meeting your unrealistic expectations.

I would argue Voldemort is more powerful than Grindelwald. Dumbledore defeated Grindelwald while Grindelwald used the Elder Wand that Grindelwald was the true master of: whereas Voldemort stalemated Dumbledore in the Order of the Phoenix duel while Dumbledore was using the Elder Wand while Dumbledore was its true master

Yeah same

And not truth, totaly different than in book

​@@radioideaxpthis part is so much better than the book

In the book they stayed

Dombledore>>>

​@jatinnegi4275 Nah,he had the Elder Wand which helped him. And even then it was basically a stalemate. Dumbledore is better but Dumbledore admits Voldemort has the raw power

They’d probably deflect the bullets

@@shadowmaster8684 the median human reaction time is ~.3 seconds, and there's no indication in the Harry Potter universe that wizards and witches have significantly faster reactions. In that time, a .45 ACP will cover anything between 100 and 200 metres, depending on bullet weight. Average wizarding duels always seem to happen at much shorter range, in the order of 20-30 metres tops. This means that the guy with the 1911 could absolutely canoe the guy with the pointy stick.

​@@pixelghostclyde8717yeah lol the hp guys are pretty weak tbh

Ok, this has been driving me crazy for seven movies now, and I know you're going to roll your eyes, but hear me out: Harry Potter should have carried a 1911. Here's why: Think about how quickly the entire WWWIII (Wizarding-World War III) would have ended if all of the good guys had simply armed up with good ol' American hot lead. Basilisk? Let's see how tough it is when you shoot it with a .470 Nitro Express. Worried about its Medusa-gaze? Wear night vision goggles. The image is light-amplified and re-transmitted to your eyes. You aren't looking at it--you're looking at a picture of it. Imagine how epic the first movie would be if Harry had put a breeching charge on the bathroom wall, flash-banged the hole, and then went in wearing NVGs and a Kevlar-weave stab-vest, carrying a SPAS-12. And have you noticed that only Europe seems to a problem with Deatheaters? Maybe it's because Americans have spent the last 200 years shooting deer, playing GTA: Vice City, and keeping an eye out for black helicopters over their compounds. Meanwhile, Brits have been cutting their steaks with spoons. Remember: gun-control means that Voldemort wins. God made wizards and God made muggles, but Samuel Colt made them equal. Now I know what you're going to say: "But a wizard could just disarm someone with a gun!" Yeah, well they can also disarm someone with a wand (as they do many times throughout the books/movies). But which is faster: saying a spell or pulling a trigger? Avada Kedavra, meet Avtomat Kalashnikova. Imagine Harry out in the woods, wearing his invisibility cloak, carrying a .50bmg Barrett, turning Deatheaters into pink mist, scratching a lightning bolt into his rifle stock for each kill. I don't think Madam Pomfrey has any spells that can scrape your brains off of the trees and put you back together after something like that. Voldemort's wand may be 13.5 inches with a Phoenix-feather core, but Harry's would be 0.50 inches with a tungsten core. Let's see Voldy wave his at 3,000 feet per second. Better hope you have some Essence of Dittany for that sucking chest wound. I can see it now...Voldemort roaring with evil laughter and boasting to Harry that he can't be killed, since he is protected by seven Horcruxes, only to have Harry give a crooked grin, flick his cigarette butt away, and deliver what would easily be the best one-liner in the entire series: "Well then I guess it's a good thing my 1911 holds 7+1." And that is why Harry Potter should have carried a 1911.

​@@seraph5765Are all Americans this funny? or You deserve special credit my boy?

Wouldn't it be more like 6 or more times: He tried to kill harry as a baby - failed (dies himself) He tried to have a minion kill him in philosopher's stone - failed (turns to ash when a preteen harry simply touches him) He tried to have the serpent of slytherin kill him - fails ( snake dies and his...ghost... is destroyed because harry stabs his book ) He tried to kill him mono e mono in goblit of fire (harry simply nopes out) He could have had him killed in order of the Phoenix, but in his undeserved arrogance just decided to play mind games. Then he thought he killed harry but it turns out that he just destroyed the horcrux connection. and he only accomplished that because harry jusy stood there. harry then just brushes off his shoulders and be like, "that's the best you got?" Then, finally, Harry kills him (more like voldy's spell backfired.) Oversimplified for comedic purposes Jeez, if i were voldy, i'd have egg on my face and be feeling inadequate NOT carrying myself around all gassed up. He must have one hell of a motivational tape collection. So i guess 4 attempts to kill Harry, himself. then, he tried to have someone do the dirty work for him 3 or 4 more times.

@@Hamrik_Oswaldactually: the reason Voldemort’s killing curse didn’t kill Harry in the Forbidden Forest is because Lily’s love protection lived on in Voldemort’s bloodstream as the result of Voldemort’s decision to have Harry’s blood used in the regeneration potion in the goblet of fire

@@CraigMcGuinn ok?

The snake was killed, they left it out for some reason

He was mentally scratching his head at this point, wondering why he cant seem to kill harry. Mf was demoralized😂