I am thinking to take one the 40 fsi,can u tell me how is the car?

Nottttttttt

He’s very good.

Because they are.

Some Audis are front wheel drive based, but the Q7 isn't.

Is it ok to put regular gas in the Q7? If not, why not?

Definitely better than the Toyota/Lexus family with their “cow catcher” front ends. Although I own a Toyota Avalon, I’m glad I’m driving it so I don’t have to see the front end. 😉

I agree! Audi SUV’s look so much better than BMW and Benz SUV’s.. BMW sedans look better, and everything looks better than Mercedes

morg4620 air suspension are expensive to replace if you're leasing get it. You can adjust height etc

morg4620 on top p

+Yuri Nikonchuk They are very similar and it would really depend on models and options. The Volvo may be slightly less expensive to repair while teh BMW has a longer included maintenance package.

+Yuri Nikonchuk Check out Consumer Reports. Audi beats them both, no question.

This is somewhat complicated. The ability for Audi to make the cars in a front wheel drive form is effect, not cause. The Quattro design puts the engine in front of the transmission and front axle. This makes it "easy" to make the car FWD in a relative sense vs a design likes BMW engine layout. This can result in lower costs and depending on the design higher efficiency. However the placement of the engine is the result of the design of Quatto and the FWD models are more of a side effect of the general design not the cause of the design.

+Alex on Autos Quattro and engine position have nothing to do with each other

+jh5kl They absolutely do. By using a longitudinal transmission an integrated center differential and front differential all in the same case it causes the engine and torque converter to be in front of the front axle. It is just not possible for this Quattro system to have the engine anywhere else.

Alex on Autos thats not true, it is possible. in these segments you just don t find midengine placements, you are fully blaming on quattro when for example audi r8 has Quattro and an engine not in the outter exteme of axle

+jh5kl Quattro in the traditional sense cannot be a midengine design or even an engine over axle design. The R8 does not use a traditional Quattro system, nor does the TT, A3, etc which use a transverse AWD system like most FWD based cars. The R8's design is wildly inefficient in terms of space utilisation because the transmission is on one side of an axle and the engine on the other so if a similar system were used for instance on the Q7 it would result in a massive hood which would push the body rearward and cut interior space by a large percentage. This may improve the weight balance, but at what cost? Audi's traditional Quattro system found in their core models A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, Q5, Q7 causes a front heavy weight balance and an engine that's in front of the front axle period.