Pragya Tiwari did an excellent job to keep Devdutt on fire, unlike Shobha who has this ridiculous need to keep interupting

Devdutt is master in distorting Hindu Scriptures.... Superficially he sounds great...But in depth analysis shows that he is taking people away from Dharma... His book "My Gita" is full of such distortions.

Personally I found My Gita quite boring, and that was before Rajiv Malhotra’s video. But that doesn’t mean all of his other works are also crap. He is a mythologist, who interprets Mythology from an academic POV as opposed to a spiritual one, which sometimes displeases readers as many only pick up books of this genre expecting the latter. So it’s understandable why people think he distorts myths, as he holds them up against an index of historical relevancy which contradicts the beliefs of people who carry these gods In their hearts. He measures the gods and their stories and practices which irritates some readers as they cannot accept the fact that these gods are nothing short of being immeasurable and infinite. He is allowed to interpret the myths as he wants. Lord Krishna told Arjuna that he was free to accept or reject his version of the Gita after pondering upon it. So it’s also up to the reader to decide if he wants to or doesn’t want to read Devdutt’s interpretations. But that doesn’t make it any less relevant for someone who chooses to accept it.

@@hrishikeshsen1141 When it is already known that Devdutta is NOT the authentic source , then why waste reading his fiction? His POV is really so important? Why not directly learn from the authentic source?

@@shaileshpkem80 Hello, 1) To me it's important to learn the historical relevancy of these myths, because it gives us a glimpse into our ancestors' thoughts. Devdutt is the only source for that because as I said, he writes his books against the index of historical relevancy. He doesn't mask his stories with Bhakti as is seen with so many authors who write these kinds of books, but he tells the tales as they are. This makes him an AUTHENTIC *HISTORICAL* SOURCE, not a spiritual one. 2) I am not looking for spiritual relevancy in his books, so I don't expect his books to be able to uplift me into higher states of consciousness, as HE IS NOT A SPIRITUAL LEADER, HE IS AN ACADEMICIAN/MYTHOLOGIST so his books are basically a collection of various myths and they are used to explain the socio-cultural evolution of Ancient India. 3) Hinduism is Sanatan - it is eternal. Which also means that different people are free to interpret different things according to their understanding. That's why we have so many sampradayas (Vaishnava, Shaiva, Shakteya, Smarta, Ganapatya, Vedanti etc..) and no one can agree amongst each other because my truth may not be the next person's truth. How can one decided who is the authentic source in this context? To me, Devi is God. To someone else, Vishnu is God, or it could be Shiva. And they all have enough sources and scriptures to back their claims. Who is right? WHO is authentic? Who can tell? 4) You and I can also write books on Hindu Mythology but that doesn't mean our ideas should be the same. If it were the same, it WOULDN'T BE FLEXIBLE, and when we begin to claim exclusivity to our truths like people of Abrahamic faiths, OUR TRUTH WILL NOT BE SANATAN/ETERNAL. So it would no longer be Hinduism.

@@hrishikeshsen1141 well articulated perspective

Devdutt is a master in distorting Hindu Scriptures.... Superficially he sounds great...But in depth analysis shows that he is taking people away from Dharma... His book "My Gita" is full of such distortions...He follows writers like Wendy Donninger who shows Hinduism/Hindu Gods in bad light... We should learn from the original scriptures rather than reading his distorted books...We can take his work as a time pass and NOT as a final word...If one is really interested in learning the scriptures then one should read books written by devotees/ Gurus of those Sampradayas

Go through this kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rNqbgKl92rXFY4E.html

Mullah will bang them left right and center,

Aree Yaar unn chutiyo ki Baat kyu kerni.. Jinko pure world mai koi ijjat nahi unke uper kya Baat jare

s ur right

They don't have the balls to call him, trust me!

He is a loon!

Stupid people have no place in algebra

@@suvodipmondal7625 Scared ?

is he gay?

@@guruh786 Yeah..totally gay.

@@guruh786 happy and gay

Lol go through this kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rNqbgKl92rXFY4E.html

No a drop of water, u and I only 0.000002% of a drop of water of the limitless ocean.

He should accept the challenge of Rajiv Malhotra if he has guts

meant same - depending upon what you consider as property.

@@vinsin328 Lol.. Not at all.. What are you talking about.. This is a मुहावरा. You can't misquote a proverb based on your personal considerations.. Your Language Teacher hasn't taught you that??.. Devdutt misquoted it. Lapsus-linguae... Like you can't say that An Infant is a Father of A Man....You've gotta say A Child is the Father of a Man... Like you can't say कोल्हू का भैंस...instead of कोल्हू का बैल (another proverb) based on your personal considerations of a cattle... ये सब तो school में ही सिखाया जाता है.. Anyway.. Always remember when your quoting a maxim.. It has to be verbatim.

@@ANKITPANDEY-vm8kx Bahhut pada likha hai bhai ye wala to...Bas Kir will have to apologize...

Where is that evidence? Can you provide that to Historian? Change the wikipedia then with your evidence of definition of myth. I can bet that you will never do it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth If Ramayana is historical then Hinduism cannot be Sanatan, dont worry you are not intelligent enough to understand that.

Devdutt is master in distorting Hindu Scriptures.... Superficially he sounds great...But in depth analysis shows that he is taking people away from Dharma... His book "My Gita" is full of such distortions.

@@shaileshpkem80 Which scriptures he distorted? File a case against him which you are not going to do anyway. Why do you care about Dharma? His book "My Gita" is full of such distortions. - like what? How does that matter, it is not a translation of any scriptures? These are the questions that you didnt answer : 1) Where is that evidence? Can you provide that to Historian 2) Change the wikipedia then with your evidence of definition of myth. I can bet that you will never do it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth 3) Ramayana Historical or Sanatana?

Watch the video,That is precisely what he says In sanskrit Itihasa means 'as it is' . Valmiki discribed the incidents as he saw it . Hence the term Itihasa.

Why? Because she interrupts when she hears something she does not want to?

@@Jo-pv4jx Lol go through this kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rNqbgKl92rXFY4E.html

Then prove it.

bas kir More research will provide proof, something that was actively denied by the British and their followers the Congress and their associates the lefties! It might take some digging, but sooner or later it will be unearthed! This civilisation goes back to ten to fifteen thousand years, much before the letters and books came about! But you may only believe when the white man says it is true!

@@umasarat2983 You provide it then. You dig it then. It is 10 or 15 thousand yrs. Let me bet you will not do anything. Change this also : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Asian_Stone_Age

He doesn't know English. If he come here then he will start hindi pollution 😷

🤣🤣

And that lady is sitting a laughing like a Moron, is this the way you compere ?