Even when he wins, Golden loses.

Can't stop taking L's

Looked like Bo took a save, maybe he sent it to Golden.

Swamp balls Bo and blue balls Golden

@@Anonsy_GB golden lost

Only bad ones

Writers strike now affecting hoi 4 YT channels

@@chattiermike140 LMAO

​

Cant remember the "swamp balls" line in the MITHC

we werent three, it was only me and one coop

We need a Hitler mode tornament. Where Dankus, Bo and other generals would only tell their coops what to do and ask them what's happening but could not see or do anything

@@tedarcher9120 That sounds fucking hilarious. They should try this fr

@@heraldearya each general would get like a car with which they could visit the front lines and have to be zoomed in at maximum

there may be something similar brewing right now

Paris? Nope buddy get your ass back across the rhine. Good game? No, your allies throw

Even when he wins he loses

golden lost

There is a script

Nice try, snake of Denmark

What are you talking about? Of course there's a script.

@@redshirt5126 I see you are a Boliever

@@kasoy5239 Your script is outdated buddy

There are reasons why that doesn't happen in MP but it'd still be fun to see it happen sometimes. At least in games where the US won the island war and India survived it'd be great to see the game continue for a bit even if the USSR caps. In games like this where GB and US lose the naval game to Italy it's pointless to continue after the Soviets die though, there is no threat to Japan and GB is a sitting duck at this point.

​@@jisookim6904exactly. Imho you should at least play for a sealion after the USSR cap, but only if there is a chance for the Allies. Here the is no chance: Japan's navy is intact, Italian Navy clapping everyone, the whole Russian industry to be put on air, you can sealion with shitters and still win lol

So basically nonhistorical playthrough?

@@Drave_Jr. sort of, but I think they have rules over volunteers and spheres of interference. I would prefer to just see them play how they want and wreak havoc on each other.

Sub 3's everywhere. Nobody can send anything they dont have a land connection too.

Usually with every big update they have a meme game where they do anything and try out the new focus trees

@@RK-cj4oc to be fair Sub 3s can be counted using NB and escorts, besides such behaviour may cause alliances to shift as players decide that one player has become more of a threat (or a pain in the arse) and attempt to subdue them. Besides Axis powers are such a pain with Sub 3s (especially for this bunch) due to historical alliances forcing allied players to play a certain way. For example an Militant Isolationist America would have little need to get involved in Europe or Asia (and suffer from subs), could invade the rest of the Americas and could build up a massive fleet for a fun Europe vs Americas fight with Asia watching and waiting for an opportunity to take down one bloc or the other.

Did we find the nut shell in the end?

BatChest

My favourite moment was when Swimmy said "It's swimming time!" and swam all over the place

The government name

" *doubt* "

I mean, it certainly helps that Bo is one of like 3? 4? People in that group who actually knows the naval game. I doubt either the UK or the US knew navy very well beyond carrier spam = win

If I remember correctly, they modified the mod so there is also a limit to deathstacking every single ship, so it's even more challenging that usual, but it also gives a nation with much weaker industry a shot.

Losing Paris is a lot easier to come back from than the Soviets capitulating, losing Africa, and losing the naval game. Allies weren't coming back from that.

@@hirocheeto7795 there could be some limits on what germany can take from soviets like not going past the hills and some type of debuff like soviet separatists. Africa could be simmiliar as there is no way germany could in reality garrison both africa and Soviet onion. And the naval game could be supported by USA getting all of south american navies (they are old ships but they can be used as a delay or striking the africa) and maybe some boost to production of ships and planes. Japan could get a debuff for industry but a buff for their army ,navy and planes when they get control over diffrent states.

That is how it ends usually. After the Soviets cap it's nearly impossible for the allies to win

@@cookiecraze1310 when the soviets take silesia ,vienna and norway the allies are pushing past rhein and italy cap. The german player ist still playing even tho its impossible for him to win.

@@SpaceFH the difference is that Endsieging Germany is pretty easy since you have to have alot of land in Europe already taken. With Allied endsieg you have to take the UK, which can be impossible if the allies go full defensive, then make a landing on the USA which is even more difficult since it takes so long to get reinforcements into the landings. You also have to build up your navy, which can take a year or four, which just drags out the game to either a stalemate that should be an axis win or an axis win that takes hours to achieve. Already going to 1945 takes hours IRL, most people just leave after the USSR falls since it's going to be hours of boring attrition. Also demanding them to take the USA is a dick move, it's even happened in Bo games and everyone makes fun of the USA player for seething (I think it was either Golden, Swimmy, or College)

Uranium fever baby

*Same, i cant wait. It was so damn good.*

​@@Bokoen1oh now I'm very interested

no spoilers, but the game went to 47 in a fallout scenario

90° F is a ton for us northern europeans lmao, if it was that hot in his room i wouldn't be surprised if he started melting.

Difference being he wanted Japan to do it, which is so much easier than Italy naval invading it

it was makko on canada and mr panda on saf with flavius on the uk

Nah its the most ghostest of ghost divisions, cause those boys are dead.