That happens SO often!

she not her were not was

OMG, go back to not knowing that someone meant the name of the episode and not the name of the TV series.

Oh i know how funny she is, this scene lives in my head rent free for decades

I was thinking, um...there is plenty. Then realized you wrote that 16 years ago lol. So long ago.

nromk Three Blind Dates.

are you serious? how can you not know about Frasier?

Aspiring Marauder and suzycreamcheesez I believe nromk meant the name of the episode, duh.

why?

@@MJ-oi5wb It stopped being funny. It started to rely on formulaic "funny lines," rather than coming out of the characters situations. pretentious.

@@LazlosPlane What I liked about the show was that the writers could do both character situations as well as "funny setups." Sometimes both in the same show, but some shows would be almost all "setups" while others were primarily character situations. It's why the show always remained fresh to me over it's 11 year run.

@@jackm4457 I guess that's okay, IF it made you laugh. It stopped making me laugh and the characters became boring, predictable, cardboard cut-outs. I started to dislike them intensely.

@@LazlosPlane When a show has a long run, it is inevitable that the characters become "predictable," which is better than being inconsistent. Soap Operas get around that predictability by going to absurd measures -- amnesia, multiple personality disorders and the ever-dependable, "evil twin." Of course, Frasier never did anything that low-brow, but, on occasion they'd write an episode that was a broad farce, with unlikely coincidences and barely plausible mis-understandings. It allowed the characters a longer tether. It's risky, but the writers of Frasier were always so excellent at technique that I was very well entertained. (And compare Frasier to the crap we saw on How I Met Your Mother, which over-used flash-backs and flash-forwards to escape the predictability. Pure crap, IMO. But, to each his own.)