Thanks!

Yes sir we'll done! I'm in the market.

haha, yeah, I'm avoiding that one. It looks like it's a 140W max single port adapter with an extra 100W tacked on but yeah eventually it'll be on. No rush on that one.

@@AllThingsOnePlaceglad you made it eventually :) I posted a question on it

Yeah, people seem to binge there way though once they find it. People end up reminding me of things from previous videos like, oh yeah, I guess I did say that, ha.

Thank you so much 😀

If it works that is a good and hopefully it keeps working for a long time. The efficiency is close, splitting hairs on the differences really. Anker does tend to release products on both ends of the spectrum each time. In this case really average with the competition.

​@@AllThingsOnePlaceAfter my initial disappointment with this charger, I've come to view it in a more positive way. This new version does support 5 amps in PPS mode (IIRC, the previous version only supported up to 3 amps). And the power distribution between the different outputs is more flexible in the new version. All in all, I no longer see this adapter to be a bad purchase. It fills my needs for a smartphone charger that supports PPS mode. And it's also great as a 65W charger for a laptop I only use from time to time.

Thanks! I don't have any specific plans for that style, I've looked at several in various videos. There's little reasoning to the adapters I pick, just pick some and test them. I do have some more multiport lower wattage adapters to test though. As far as what is the best one so far monoprice 42620 is good if you only need to charge phones and lower powered devices. The Insignia has a few less output options but it can charge 20V devices as a bonus over the monoprice, then the mcdodo 40W dual port has lots of charging modes so probably the most capable but it is a little less efficient. The apple 35W ones aren't amazing and very expensive.

Yeah, these mostly all will work there but yeah I don't have any with the plug style as native. I'm slowly working on adding some other ones in. I have a few EU ones I got at Saturn.

What is 12v for?

Some devices use 12V. I think it's most useful to use one of these adapters as a replacement for a couple wall warts since a lot of those end up being 12V.

​@@brandonmorris3746basically everything low power with those barrel connectors, fiber optic devices(NT) modems, routere, tv boxes, android tv boxes, toothbrush chargers, etc

Thanks.

Thanks for watching.

Hows the performance on charging a laptop

@@ys-50989 good performance, no heating, I haven't face any issue but 65w is odd, can be use only one port to charge laptops, if you use another port the charging speed decreased, atleast 100W is a must, my thought

Yeah, I'm kind of in the same boat. The 100W just does more and works with more devices. I haven't tested any RUIDUN devices yet.

That is an angle, but it is also up to the device to decide how fast to charge. The power adapter is just the supply. There is always the option of using a 60W rated USB cable to force a slower charge with a more efficient adapter. For phones, yeah, it's ridiculous, they're forcing charging speeds that small batteries can't handle and it may work for a few demos but in the long run the batteries do not last. Samsung has a toggle for those faster charging modes for a reason. The power adapter doesn't force anything on the device though. So, if a laptop maker decides to allow fast charging they hopefully did the work to make sure the battery and electronics can handle that.

I just wanted and power adapter to be a small as possible and able charge my 60w laptop and smart phone, so I picked the 67 watt before I had seen your review.

​@@AllThingsOnePlaceWhat charging speed do you recommend for Samsung devices?

Yeah, that's one way to do things. Wow, trying to find articles on anything on the internet is a joke now. So and so did a study on this, no references and every other news source references the same article with no references... but yeah it sounds like an apparent power problem.

Yeah, typical though.

In terms of efficiency, yeah it seems like that. The power distribution between the USB-C ports is more flexible with this one though. And now it also has the 12-V PD output, that was typically lacking in Anker chargers. But if efficiency is very important to you, yeah, it looks like a step back. Edit: mistype.

@@ethereal026 I bought the 735 with UK plug for £35, and rarely need to charge really quickly. I’ll stick with this for the time being but was hoping for more efficient lower wattage chargers by now.

I can't get it. I've tried. My order keeps getting canceled.

@@AllThingsOnePlace Please don't give up. Let's hope that this is just a delivery problem of a new product and not an attempt to avoid a not so good test result.

I have a bunch of Insignia ones to test still. I have a bunch of power banks too.

Different class of device. I do have some Nomad devices here, not sure if I have that one though. Either way, I added it to the list.

UGREEN has lots of videos on the channel. I do these kind of mini comparisons with a few different, untested, adapters. There's no particular rhyme or reason.

@@AllThingsOnePlace I’m new to your channel I will check them out, I’m currently looking for a dual usb c charger since the iPhone is usb c and I have to keep changing the cable to charge my phone and airpods max, these videos help allot

Thanks for sharing! I think it's great that the market has all these options, I certainly tend to use the higher port count and power devices.

They’re on the list. Not sure exactly when they’ll be out.

Thanks for the suggestion, I added it to the list.

Hmm. If it is a phone and a watch those are both fairly low wattage devices so basically anything with two USB C ports and a relatively high efficiency. I'd check for a safety listing. So, out of the ones in this video any will work. I do tend to use the more efficient larger adapter but I have it for laptops and things so it has double use.

So, it is true that it needs power all the time. About 1W. The Anker with the magsafe cable plugged in will negotiate for 27W for that port so the remaining power would be available on the other port.

Yeah, seems to be about on par performance wise with what other people are selling which is pretty surprising at that price point.

Anker is by port. They typically label one port with a phone and one with a laptop symbol. The laptop port becomes 47W and the phone port becomes 20W (5,9V modes only).

Yeah, I wasn't happy with that one.

Yeah, you can squeeze a few more percent out, you really have to overbuild to get more though. Switch topologies, spend an unreal amount of time and money optimizing the transformer.

Yeah, it is difficult to gauge what is hot for these chargers. The smaller they get the warmer the cases seem to be though. 60 degrees c on the case seems to be pretty normal.

Yeah, they went for small as possible again instead of efficiency and performance in this one.

Probably 100w since it offers enough power for several devices.

I'd go for the 100W adapter over the 67W. It did great internationally too and on the plane. I did have to hold it into the socket on the plane though, the sockets are so worn out...

Yeah, I probably can’t find my 45w nano ii.

I believe that's the same as what the US market has as the GaN6 charger. I haven't looked at it yet but I have it.

Also the their 240W usb c to usb c cables!

Thanks for the suggestions, I added them to the list.

@@AllThingsOnePlace You should also add CUKTECH 20 Power Bank, 25,000mAh 210W which seems like a new company with new products so you should add that to your list too! They look quite interesting.

@@EdgarCool4ever Someone mentioned they merged with ZMI and in looking at it that Cuktech looks like the same one as the ZMI no20 power bank I already reviewed.

Anker in both teardowns and testing I have done, I haven't tested all of them or torn down all of them by any means, generally does good in leakage tests.

@@AllThingsOnePlace Thanks!

I mean between those three, Anker has been the best and most consistent showing of chargers. They are the biggest one and certainly have some junk on the market with the good stuff but in direct comparison with UGREEN or Aukey they win.

Yeah, just from a power electronics perspective and teardowns I've seen, it use a separate microcontroller to monitor internal temperatures. It will essentially force a renegotiation of the USB power level to a lower level if the temperature gets too hot. Any claims of the battery or device end sounds like it's not true, I've seen this on various ads for power adapters and it's just not true. The device can also trigger a renegotiation or just ask for less power anytime, but that's on the device side. Essentially the communications is about power level between the devices.

Thanks!

Yeah, I think their claim is the DC output is perfectly stable, this was the worst of the bunch. The format is slowly evolving hopefully will get a little better over time although not much has changed this year.

@@AllThingsOnePlace Rome wasn't built in a day. Can't wait to see what's in store for the future!

@@AllThingsOnePlacedo you think it's possible that you just had a defective unit? It would’ve been great if you tested 2 identical devices to get an average

@@Mr_nah Yeah, it is a possibility, but the probability is very low. I have tested more than one of several samples and found that the data isn't any different as long as the unit is functional. If it doesn't work then things get interesting. I did that too.

@@AllThingsOnePlace thanks, you've got a new subscriber.

I haven't looked at the nexode pro 65W so no opinion. The prime 67W was underwhelming.

Can you help me please I already ordered anker 735 65 w After that I came across anker 335 67 wat comes with cable 5A which I don't have I only have cable c that come with my s22u in box Should I cancel my 735 and buy the 335 because of the cable 5A ????? They are almost the same price on amazon right now

Yeah, I literally use a power strip down to the floor because yes, they're too heavy and they fall out of the wall socket if it's loose, like on airplanes, forget it. The socket probably needs to be replaced in many cases but that involves an electrician and a lot of money.

Kind of take your pick, there are plenty of safe options on the market. I generally stay away from 65W devices. The Amazon Basics 65W is okay, but it's only one port. As you say more, damage is inevitable in batteries, every charge and discharge cycle causes the battery to degrade a little. The charger being sized appropriately and the device only using what it needs while managing temperatures is what makes the battery last longer. I personally like a 20 - 30 W charger like the UGREEN 30W Nexode, or the Google 30W charger, Belkin is good too...

The 100W prime charger, ha. Nano II and the GaNPrime are both about equal. If I needed more ports the GanPrime is probably the choice for most people due to that. I have taken the Nano II several times because in the field I usually dedicate one port to one device. So, last time I used it, it was directly powering a camera for a whole day but my use case may not align with others.

This is the newest one. I didn't check if it has VOOC support, I have no way to test that. I have a tester that will say stuff but that doesn't mean it actually works.

Thanks, I added it to the list. I did one Acefast charger, it has no over current protection, super dangerous, I stopped looking at anything from them after that.

Price was right.

The Aukey stuff was not great that I looked at. I didn't get any higher wattage ones though. I haven't seen the Bavin brand yet though but I will keep an eye out for them.

​@@AllThingsOnePlaceBavin is quite a popular brand here at southeast asia and sell a lot of consumer electronics. They mostly focus on charging devices though like chargers, cables and powerbanks which are very cheap compared to competitors and they recently released multiple gan chargers rated at 100w which I found pretty weird seeing that they only differ in their design with two being rectangular(one with 3, the other with 4 ports) while the most expensive one is square shaped(has 4 ports). I don't see many people reviewing bavin chargers as in depth as you so I would like to see your opinion on their products seeing that the items they focus on aligns with your channel...

Some do different negotiation but typically a cable alone should not negotiate anything (c-c). Unless it is an apple cable, then yes, it negotiates in the cable and ruins the speed of the other port with just a cable plugged in.

@@AllThingsOnePlace thank you! C1 port was indeed plugged in with an apple lightning cable.

It is a trickly question because it is device specific. If you are only charging a phone, then any 30W adapter or smaller is plenty good. If you have a laptop or other devices, then add more ports, you need more watts.

It is fine. It is just so close the dimensions and weight of the 100W, which is better, but also more expensive that I gave it decreased recommendation. But it is a perfectly safe charger to use with your apple devices.

@@AllThingsOnePlace thanks you i like your video !!

The anker is surprisingly good for this, meaning low shock. I haven't tested all of them in this video though.

@@AllThingsOnePlace I tested gan charger from xiaomi and it read 40 volts from tip of the cord to ground using AC tester. Thank you very much 😌, maybe I consider buying this.

Yeah, functionally, they made improvements to the whole line which is certainly welcome. I kind of roll that into the it negotiates better but keep it vague purposefully since it can cover so much. In this case the device is marginally less efficient. As I was saying in the video they’re really all kind of the same for power performance, it comes down to that better charging negotiation with more devices.

@@AllThingsOnePlace Makes sense. Thanks kindly, sir! Always looking forward to your videos.

@@AllThingsOnePlace Oh fyi, I mentioned this in an Amazon review recently. Anker got back to me immediately and offered refunds on all of my 2022 adapters, even though I bought them over a year ago. Kinda crazy. Anyway, keep up the great work.

@@AllThingsOnePlace So negotiation capabilities can potentially equate to compatibility?

@@roguegeek In some sense yes, the adapter figures out what's plugged in and how to deliver power more effectively, in this case they also added more modes, it doesn't mean it'll deliver more power by any means or if the requests are beyond the capability it will work but that of course makes sense. Also, crazy on the refund policy, Anker is more expensive but in general I have heard good things about the customer service.

I would expect the S22 to come with a 5 amp cable. The three series Anker adapters tend to be measurably worse on the performance side. But it is up to you!

The charger can inflict damage in uncontrolled situations, modern phones don't really allow this, they do as you say, regulate. Some phones, allow damage essentially by letting you opt in to faster charging, Samsung 45W charging for example. But yeah, even still there are protections in place. Long term charging at 45W peak versus 20W peak has some suspected impact. The issue is there's not a lot of published information out there on this. Battery specific data sure, mostly all paywalled or double paywalled, IEEE is double paywalled now, but no data on in device performance and degradation. It takes a long time and no one wants to do it. I'd do it if it was funded.

@@AllThingsOnePlace I think it is pretty hard to research this unless one is able to break things down and really determine what's going on. I've already read that for battery health, you avoid heat and don't over/under charge. Outside of heat, I don't know if actually charging at higher power alone does anything to damage the battery. That is what I was curious about. I suppose if one really wants to be safe, they can hook their phone up to a 5W charger and let it sit. On the other hand (my own theory) if I just fast charge it at top speed, I can literally charge my phone in a few minutes. So how bad is exposure to heat for a few minutes? I don't know. I know wireless charging causes my phone to heat up even slow charging so I figure that is bad either way. Even if one can plot out a curve of charging speed vs time vs battery life degradation, one also needs to factor in how much usage of the phone degrades the battery. If I'm in a hot environment, playing a game, etc, the phone will heat up too. Sometimes much longer than a charge cycle. My theory is that this has more of an affect on battery life than the few minutes I'm charging for. Then, how long does the average person keep their phone for and how bad does it have to get to matter. My phone brand knew lasted over two days with "average" use. 5yrs later, it's now just under one day. (ie. on a busy day, I may need to recharge). It's only now that I really care but after 5yrs, I want a new phone anyways. I think its like nutritional epidemiology. There's just way too many variables to get a good answer. BTW, if you want to link to some IEEE articles, those of us can access might be interested in reading what's out there.

It's okay, it is about an average performance adapter for that category. As usual the 100W adapters tend to beat the pants off of these.

@@AllThingsOnePlace thanks, It was great it charges my samsung devices at full 45w speed. Thank you for your amazing work. Keep it up.

not at all, it doesnt have us safety certiticated

​@@PhucNguyen-sg7fqWhat do you mean safety certificate? Is it like warranty right?

No, it's a bunch of criteria for AC safety of the device. Basically, checking to see how the device behaves in failure conditions and under duress that may happen while plugged into an AC socket to the interaction with people. UGREEN has some listed devices and some aren't. If it isn't generally I steer clear.

@@AllThingsOnePlace How would you be able to check this information? I'm sorry, I am new to all this and wanted to learn more!

@@sportshighlights1900 There are various marks the device can have but in the the US or Canada there will be a company and a little US and C on the corners of the logo indicating it complies with an Underwriters Laboratory standard for safety. It is something on my to do list to go over the different logos on devices at some point.

That isn't a link to a video. There's a series on USB cables on the channel. I didn't test any essager ones. You don't want the cable to consume watts.

Well, it's interesting, so you can make things smaller since you drive the frequency higher but then you have more losses in the switching since you drove the frequency higher. Also, GaN devices do tend to have higher on resistance which also cancels some of the gains. With the all in one packages available you get more efficiency from other parts of the circuit though.

No preference.

They put on the box they are no1.

I did.

@@AllThingsOnePlace okay thank you, I search for it

They work but they aren't the best adapters out there.

@@AllThingsOnePlace So i dont know why but i have binge watched your videos for like 2-3 hours. but i need conclusion. what do you suggest for me, 1 charger that can charge iphone 15 pro (USB C), apple watch (USB C) and iphone 11 (USB A)? Thank!!!! :)

@@AllThingsOnePlace or should I get separate charger for each one? if that's the case, what chargers do you recommend? I hope you will reply me :)

@@usamaakram913 Separate charger for each will certainly work. The only charger apple specifically lists for the 15 PRO is the 20W USB C charger, they say it works with larger ones but no specifics on what or how it is charging. They just need to say PD 9V-3A capable or whatever it is. Anyway, my go to is the Satechi 165W four port charger, which is a bit on the larger side but works with everything I've used it with, I don't have an iphone 15 to test though.

Thanks for the suggestion.

Yeah, anker provided a suction cup ring that went around the adapter to hold it in the socket, it’s in the review of the GaN Prime adapters.

I should put it in the middle, just buy this one, then back to the regularly scheduled programming. Yeah, some people skip to the end. The majority, from the YT viewed percentage, skip to the chart then leave. It is expected that people bounce around though, I do the same thing watching other peoples videos.

hahaha