Definitely a solidly good guy.

Ditto 😊

Because he know that he plays against beginners. If he met someone playing like this on his 2300 rating, he would be definitely shocked. But on this rating until ~1000 it's completely OK

@@chess26622 It's because otherwise you clowns that cheer him smurfing and shit-stomping newbies would criticize him. He expresses surprise and exasperation that players aren't following the opening he wants to use, because he's an absolute clown.

​@@chess26622 i don't really understand elo rating at the bottom end. It just seems odd that people are not even taking his pieces.

71.9% is not that great as far as accuracy

After watching him Blunder his Queen you’re right 71.9 might be too high 😅

He accurately sacrificed all of his pieces.

Stockfish probably saw the non-blunders as accurate enough to contribute to the accuracy. My guess is that a royal fork and hanging your queen rates higher than two moves that weaken your position without losing material.

I am a 950 and in my last 20 games I have 5 games with under 71.9% accuracy. I won 2 of them. There is no way this guy played better than me in any of those 60-70% accuracy games.

Same. It's weird how we experience time when playing and thinking versus watching

😂 woot

That's exactly it. He's stomping newbies, and wondering why they're not playing at the level he wants, when he has what, 5 times the ELO?

Well I don’t think he’s 2665

yeah, i mean i get it we’re all human and make mistakes but those blunders were inexcusable.

Maybe doing a Chess simp style challenge, give away everything

Mayhap sandbagging.

Or very tilted

C'mon guys, it's 500-600 rating, Nelson literally plays against beginners, what else did you expect?

Yeah, he absolutely crushed the unsuspecting newbies and low skill players on his Smurf account. Outstanding. Great job.

His opponents rating was 500 something he Blundered his Queen on his third or fourth move not that shocking

​@@michaelmassaro4375They _only_ blundered the queen? They blundered pieces very often and consistently and don't take their defended pieces. I swear Martin plays better. A 500 elo player should beat that guy 90% of the time.

And for added benefit i am eating rice while watching

great suggestion, he might actually get to play it too, as it works against Caro Kann and the French Defense.

There's a browser extension called Iridium for KZfaq that lets you reverse playlists and has lots of other quality of life things. Gamechanger.

It's easy for us to say to look moves ahead. The problem is the beginner doesn't know where to look. Our eyes are drawn to the patterns we know are either risky or have potential. A beginner sees 1000 possible moves, we see 4 or 5 candidates that matter and then look down the lines.

@@GigsVTI think the first thing most people learn in chess is not to Blunder or hang pieces regardless of what they think they see or want to do they have to realize an attacking piece has limitations on what it can actually do Trading is another thing beginners do they see their Bishop can take a knight or whatever and they do it just because it’s right there in front of them I think over time a player realizes pieces work better when they are in coordination like targeting one piece say a knight with a bishop and a rook they realize those two pieces working together can accomplish a nice capture

Welll his disdain was mostly because his opponent just made blatant mistakes like Blundering the Queen when my opponents do that it makes me smile 😊

But that checkmate was _so_ satisfying

Us busch gassers got robbed

Added!

​@@ChessVibesOfficial NELSON!!!!! I was really hoping that you could start a series where you explain openings on your channel..Like at least the basic idea behind each opening and going into it a bit more. I'm watching your rating climb series and frankly, it doesn't go into much detail about different openings or their variations.. This could be a good opportunity for guys like us to learn the basic ideas or principles behind openings instead of just memorizing the main lines..I don't think a lot of chess channels do this.. Would be really great if you could consider this. I really love your content mn.. I've tried a few channels and actually switched over from Gotham chess to here because, there it was going a bit fast for me..Good luck with your channel nd good luck to your wife on improving her chess skills. Hope the kids are not giving you too much trouble. Take care of your health! 😊

Queen moves to e4 the bishop can’t move there ? Unless I’m missing something

I think a free piece is better than positional advantage And he explained why it's better to take the bishop first because it wins material

What happened with the Viih Sou guy, how was the situation resolved?

Low elo people (like me) usually don't play positional chess because we are not very good at tactics so we throw pieces at you whenever it looks like an equal-ish trade (because we can't comprehend the effect of losing pawns) to simplify the game. And then the game goes on to 80 moves where both parties are hunting pawns with their rooks and someone eventually stumbles into a checkmate or a draw because we also suck at endgame.

Just play out the first 3-6 moves in lichess analysis board and look how many different moves have been played on every step and a lot of them make sense. It's a copycat because neither you nor your opponent's go for any original ideas. Most basic plan for black is to delay castling to get development and storm with pawns for example against castles king for example.

I was wondering that as well.