Bring D.Kanter next time :D

Can't be the first comment on the GN comment, but. I can be the first comment to say Penis. So. Penis.

Steve is the shit.

It would be nice to see to beat the timespy score together with jay :D

@@zachsteiner no your head is shit .. inherited shit .. fools always go nuts while seeing a wise one.. 😉

I have Spent more hours on 3D Mark than probably on half of my list of steam games.

I know its very sad.

Everyone: Builds PC Also Everyone: PLAYS video.

2 years from now: Intel: Look how fast my 12 cores are in real world applications! Everyone: I need the 32 core Ryzen!!! Holy $h1t!! Most popular application in the world: Cinebench

@@xicofir3737Only time I run benchmarks is when I upgrade my computer. Lets me know that I did not spend all that money for nothing ;)

Also Seriously Look at the 2600x, 2600, 2700, and 2700x. I know in Canada there are some amazing deals this week. I got a 2700x for $280 CAD on Amazon Prime Day.

Yea just got the 3600x upgrading from the i5 4690k it’s a huge upgrade for a great price.

Still if 3900X can't keep up 5 GHz with different number of cores, why 3600X can't do 5 GHz at least in single core boost? It could be a real value with good single or double core boost.

You're getting 7700k gaming performance + 2/4 threads extra to keep those minimums up and so you can have a web broswer open watching a movie or something without stutter. Ask me how I know with my 4770k OC'd its so anoyying the performance hit.

The best gaming CPU in the world

Amazing name!

And what a combo it is!

More like Jayxux

I think this means a new season of Scrapyard Wars will begin production soon. Linus and Luke vs Steve and Jay.

@@Slavolko yes, best tech video of 2019

Amd Steve vs Intel Jay

Jay's been binge watching the John Wick trilogy again. Delusions of Grandeur?

It was intentional

@@james2042 You don't say?!

It's like the Sith vs the Jedi

JayzTwoNexus

@America exactly, my PC budget is about $2000 everytime.

@@vinsmoke2865 how about GamersTwoCents

Gamers' Two cents

@Washington’s Highest That's pretty cool

You must be the next Sherlock Holmes

Halo wars!

@Steve Sherman ruthless

So now it is 26 JUN 2020 and I am still running a 1600 on a Crosshair 6 and 32 Gb of Flair 3200 and the CPU daily drives @ 3.850 Ghz. Been giving a a 3700x a good look. But maybe I will just wait to see what 2021 has available for GPUs. The 1600 does OK with a 60Hz 1440 monitor. But a new 3700x is $275. Maybe I will do both. The GTX 690 is getting long in the tooth. AS for new Motherboard , nope, not until DDR 5 matures. I learned, still got a 350 prime plus sitting on the shelf

nappydrew owning an 8700k I have to agree with this statement.

As well as and forcing Intel to step up it's game after so long.

I thank whichever mass schooling system has produced the same poor use of English that results in comments that read like clones, just like yours.

And thanking amd for the competition. Having AMD and Intel competing in the market is good for us all. We benefit from increases in productivity, ipc, and generally better products from this. I've been rooting for AMD because of this. Intel has held on for to long and the market shows. Now we have so much choice it's really amazing. The PC building scene is more accessible today than it was just 2 years ago.

i did thank them, with my money lol

Uncut tho

THIS

I agree with that :)

YESSSS

I would subscribe to that so hard

It's so confusing

Whats the odd? 11:12?

You mean ARM wrestling, surely

@@fajaradi1223 8:12

@@millionmice take your like and get out

trolls and harassers can take down you tube channel destroy TV show anime show which happened to bleach. Trolls if get enough destroy small businesses

wHO

@@albinoalpaca1059 the absolute unit

he is good too!

@@albinoalpaca1059 the god

I honestly have no fucking idea who that is

well I mean, if you're gonna fawn over 12 cores, just wait for september cause well.... 16 cores.

@@shawnpitman876 the 3950x is going to remain in the Threadripper line up. the 50x naming scheme as always been the start up for Threadripper

@@hexotech5202 Dude, they've already announced 3950x AM4 CPU coming in sept. WTF are you even talking about? Its not threadripper.

@@shawnpitman876 It's a threadripper-ripper 😅

@@MephistoDerPudel erm, i misread that. DERP.

This dude's knowledge is above the pack for sure.... and above most of our heads as well. Mine included.

rightfully so!

So you include Der 8auer?

@@FATMAN162x And swallowed.

@@Vanadium his knowledge of actual chip design is insane, but his knowledge of real world performance is non existent

Is that per eye? I think I see 6gb total(dual channel)

I heard they can only smell 4 cores (up to 3,7 ghz)

Thats why nvidia put another half onto the 970. Kek

Windows you say? :)

I thought it was only 3.5 gb

Best tech comment ever! So true

Then do something about it so you aren't broke. I realize this is easier said than done, but do whatever you gotta do! Remember, you're more of a badass than you realize!

The Silent Observer Suddenly Wholesome!

Well, I have to wait for summer to arrive, I can’t work during winter.

Jayz should be red

Agreed...or a red vs green conversation on GPUs, that could be fun too

BillWills what board?

@@MrMoviePhoneEx Asus Prime X370 Pro

You realize theirs not optimization for the x300 series , or am I wrong ? 🤔🙃

@@bdubbstsi pretty sure you mean 400 series

@@waterlemon5434 The clock speeds i'm seeing are very close to X570

my 1700 with 1080 still rocks who needs upgrading. jk i dont have any money

Nah enthusiast is still waiting for the 3950X.

@@GMCLabs lmaoo true i have a 2080ti and 8700k anything but the 3950x is a waste at this point.

Same situation here. I was happy with my OC'd 1700... But I really wanted Zen 2 and now I have a 3900X. Considering gaming is the most intensive task I do, I can't really justify it. It is fun to watch it blow through multithreaded benchmarks, though. And it slotted right into my Asus X370-Pro. Thanks for backwards compatibility AMD!

@@alsy0055 My Phenom II x6 with GTX925 still rocks, who needs upgrading. WAIT NO IT HURTS, IT HURTS SO MUCH, GAAAAH. (to be honest the GTX925 was replaced twice, first with a GTX750Ti because the 295 started going wonky and unreliable in spite of being repasted and then with a GTX970 because the 750 was starting to really get on my nerves with its lack of performance; but the Phenom II is still in dire need of upgrade, and i mean... i could plop in an FX-8350 in there for a shitty overpriced sidegrade.... but i should really go with something much less horrible)

Just go all in on being a Tech fan. Get one of each along with Intel processors as well!

Buy the 3600 instead. Why because it’s faster in both gaming and multi core applications.

@@NovaDoll depends, you could spend the extr money on a better gpu

@@Hetsu.. the 3600 is 200 usd tho? So basically same price league but vast improvement in performance. But yeah depends on your needs, ofc

@@Bloomingtide Some people are on really strict budgets, and saving $50 could be important

You were the only one stoned here buddy.

@@GholaTleilaxu I beg to differ , I know atleast 20% of the viewer are in California 🤷‍♂️

If so.. Its cool! Being High for me helps in games!!

Dealing with the EXACT same situation 😭

@@shadoze4267 Yo, it's Amazon Prime Day. You can't lose on a cpu purchase.

C G i’m just hoarding money towards the end of the year and then I’ll splurge lol right now its looking like AMD’s 3900x and a 2080 super or 2080 ti

Never wait on computer parts. either buy everything all at once or don't and wait out for a good sale day. Never buy computer parts piece by piece at different times unless you already have a computer built and doing it for upgrading. Longer you wait the older the parts are and more newer models come out if you want to wait for cheaper prices.

Same but its been like 2 years now lol

nice, good cpu

I picked up a 2700X for only $199 on Prime Day. I'm happy with it

Love my 2700X man! I payed full price and no regrets. I leave it at stock and it happily boosts itself as needed. 90% gaming, 10% watching video's like this :)

Motherboard recommendation for 2700x anyone?

@@dsmooth7183 a b350/b450 is pretty cheap. I run a ROG Strix B350F though I did have to flash the bios up to the latest firmware. Z- boards are nice but cost more.

At least 60% of people don't give a single fuck about ethics, as they're the type of people who'd trample their own mother on black friday sale just to save $50 on something.

@@shawnpitman876 I must add though that some mothers are a bit crazy, and so their usefulness could be debated... (Trust me when I talk about crazy, as my mother is the cuckoo who's nest the 1 flew over😂😂😂)

Intel didn't need to bribe actually since the core I series shitted every AMD's offering at that time

To be fair AMD would have done the same if they had the upper hand. Don't think companies will be "ethical" if they can get a better bottom line by working around the rules.

@@loicjeannin6233 2003-2006, Dell offered ZERO AMD computers, even though their CPUs were in fact stronger. Learn some BASIC information on what's gone down before you spew your ignorance. Intel was paying them up to a billion dollars a year to do so.

Exactly the same here, i5 2500k, it has been a great 7 years but i have to let you go!

@@tojern hehe its like an old reliable friend such a shame that intel wont offer todays version of a 2500k's speed and value with more cores . but guess what i dont care anymore because AMD did it for them :)

I still have a Phenom II x6 clocked to 3.7 GHz. It's... not very good.

I5 2500k still runs well but sadly I’ve already ordered a X570 and 3800x with a rtx 2080 to drive my 3440 x 1440 haven’t stopped grinning yet.

@@johnyang799 This shouldn't be happening really. Perhaps you get some holdover driver even hidden one if you transferred Windows from a prior system that's pissing on your parade? Or you might have a faulty piece of hardware, like mainboard or storage disk or bad thermal management, forced throttle. I mean really none of the reviewers mention slow booting or software compatibility issues. Or is it some particular board where all users of the board experience this issue?

The i9-9700k is a comedy lake SKU with 10 cores and 30 threads (superduper threading).

@@mbp1646 "comedy lake" lmaoo

I'd watch that.

What are we talking about here? OG GameBoy, Pocket, Color, or Advance?

They said it in the video, for pure gaming, 8700k is still the king of the hill with the 3600 as a close second.

@@abdoufma 9700k*?

I hate that phrase... “for pure gaming”...... That’s so ridiculous. The ONLY reason to buy a more expensive Intel proc for gaming is if you game -competitively-. If you don’t game competitively and you spend $200 more on an Intel proc for 5% better frame rates, you’re an idiot, and part of the reason prices are so high.

Nothing makes you question your whole life more than picking computer parts.

caRn WRONG! I hAvE a Ryzen 5 2600x!

@caRn Where the fuck did that even come from? Nothing in his comment AT ALL gave any hint to leaning one way or another.

Hmm. Both of them are in Linus Roast

Linus really dropped the ball on this one ;)

Competitors, not enemies... there's a world of difference. Usually the greater the level of competition, the greater the level of mutual respect.

CAC2244 Should I raise the “SARCASM” flag now or later?

Imagine if AMD and Intel would sit down like this lol

@@ronaldbeer5604 hope that's sarcasm because they have. Intel CPUs with AMD gpus

@@ronaldbeer5604 They did. Hades canyon.

lol

amd all the way because cheaper, you need those funds to pay for college

you're not gonna have a bad experience either way, but if you're not into overclocking and you're on a budget, just go AMD.

@HVAC Quality Assurance Yeah, I build on both platforms (not a KZfaqr, in real life) and 9900k is still king of pure gaming and overclocking (9900k kills a 3950x at gaming), but there's a surge of AMD fanbois lately, so well, that's what I build mostly right now. For workstations I go AMD, for enthusiast builds, I go either 3900x or 9900k/ks depending on customer preference.

If you are on a budget ryzen 5 or 7. If you want a max gaming rig go 9900k. But imo intel doesn't realy have an asnwer to the ryzen 5 and 7 class in terms of overall value.

mkd1r HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA That made me laugh so hard.

Lol

Isn't that the same thing for Intel CPUs?

@@evanlin7767 More, or less, but can't say for their iGPU as the only Intel devices I currently own that work are an old ACER Asprie One ZG5 netbook with a 32bit Atom, and old Dell P4 DOS/Win 98 se/XP era build.

Agreed 100%. My all-red machine has given me 0 problems on Linux. Nvidia GPU drivers were an issue for me in the past and hearing their performance being gimped on purpose on Linux doesn't make me feel any better about them (not to mention GPU passthrough is a pain with them). Intel, well... Intel actually does okay with Linux stuff, but I feel better sticking with AMD CPUs for various reasons.

Which Linux distro is the best for current windows user who wants to migrate? I heard a lot about Mint? Cinnamon?? *my Typical usages are for 3D (Blender), Video encode/decode and PS (Gimp?) **Thanks in adv

Intel processors and iGPU's work fine on Linux. However, AMD processors absolutely destroy Intel's processors in Linux when you benchmark them. Just look at the Pentium n4200 on Ubuntu and then compare it to the AMD A10-9620p which runs on a significantly older and weaker architecture. My A10-9620p at the time I benchmarked it last was having thermal issues and even throttled during Geekbench but it still managed to pull off a rounded 4800 multi-core score. The Pentium n4200 which is the price point competition of the A10 (or it was before Ryzen mobile launched) tops out at around 3900. Both tests were run on Ubuntu 18.04 running Geekbench in the terminal. Start trying to compare gaming performance and even in games that prefer Intel processors the AMD processor will still usually outperform the Intel processor while on Linux. I haven't tested many games, and I don't think I've tested any that favor one brand over the other, only Skyrim and Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic 2. I don't have either laptop anymore to test anything else. I'm gonna only reference Skyrim for this because KOTOR 2 is old as hell and runs well on pretty much anything. I'm talking old Skyrim by the way, not the remaster. Settings were- 1366x768 resolution No anisotropic filtering No AA Shadows on Medium Textures on Medium Render distance set to the middle of the bar on each slider Fixed Shadows and FPS mod installed. Without this mod the game is unplayable on either because of frame skipping and artifacting caused by shadows Ubuntu 18.04 for OS No software running in the background The AMD system did have 4gb more RAM, but in Ubuntu neither system ever hit 4gb of RAM usage to begin with. They both came close to around 3.7-3.8gb while running the game. AMD system specs- AMD A10-9620p 8gb single channel DDR4 RAM at 1866MHz. Man this generation of AMD mobile CPU's was weird Radeon R5 integrated Bristol Ridge graphics. 1tb HDD Intel system specs- Intel Pentium n4200 4gb LPDDR3 RAM at 1866MHz, don't know if it was dual channel or not. Intel HD 505 graphics 64gb eMMC storage Running through the opening mission on both laptops with the same settings in the same room with the same ambient temperature, the Intel laptop ran the game at 22FPS pretty consistently. I didn't log it, just watched the numbers and it floated around 18-22fps most of the time. The AMD laptop made the Intel laptop look like weak. Ran the game at a solid 35-60FPS. There's a lot more fluctuation with the framerate on the AMD processor but it's overall much higher. I don't have experience with AMD's dedicated cards on Linux and no experience firsthand with Nvidia on Linux at all. Only with those two laptops. And the Pentium was only temporary because it wasn't my laptop. For Linux devices AMD absolutely stomps the ass of the competition. But in other operating systems it's not such an easy decision. Intel definitely works, I'm not saying Intel is BAD in Linux. I mean look at Chrome OS and Cloudready. Both are Linux based operating systems that Intel absolutely dominates the market in. Intel just isn't the best processor to go for in a Linux system where gaming is going to be a focus in my experience. However Intel's heat management and power efficiency are significantly better on the laptop side for the older processors like the Pentium n4200. The A10 took a repaste to get the damn thing just to stop throttling after an hour of sitting idle. It's not bad anymore though. I still adamantly despise HP for their cooler design but it at least stopped throttling. But if raw FPS is a must have and you want Linux, AMD is king. Sorry for the rant OP I just felt like this fits with what you said and helps validate it even more.

i7-9700k. It was a typo in the video.

Why don't you run the test yourself? Open system monitor and set it to display the cpu activity. Then launch a game. You will be able to see what each core is doing, Same goes for any program, things like video rendering tend to max out all the cores, where games usually only use a single or a few threads.

@@Calendyr not anymore

@@ReLoadXxXxX What do you mean?

@@Calendyr I have but don't have, or want, all the current top games. Thought it'd be an interesting video for people to see. With programs I run, I'm very disappointed in how few threads the programs utilize.

gcc all cores. make -j 48 (#threads). proxmox, kvm?

You forgot a couple of pluses there

@@My_Old_YT_Accountthey will eventually have to come up with something new. super14nm 14nmprofessional 14nm16+

You still have most part of Zen 2/X570 platform made in 14LP+++.

Can't wait for the 14nm++++ super edition!

Everything matters. That's why it's poorly clockable and still have quite high power consumption.

My condolences.

(and gals. sorry if that seemed sexist. Just a general term)

Best CPU performance per dollar

Hell yeah! Those were the days :) I still have my 2500+ Barton.

Had an athlon 2200+, was awesome at it's time. What I want to forget is when amd was selling the athlon 64 3200 for 1400£ 😔

Pinmod time

@@LoneBlade5 I've lost a XP 1700+ bcz of that... 😢

Yes Intel might remember too, they had to buy the benchmark programs to make P4 worth it.