Im also curious about the production process. Just an uneducated speculation, but I think there could be some blowback, as far as wastes, on that end of things.

@@marklar53 apparently the idea is to use the waste products for farming and fertilization so there’s no waste at all.

Music spoils it though

Too loud.

Ammonia cracks copper alloys, but is harmless to steel and most other metals.

Merci pour ces informations Est-ce que vous avez une idée sur le traitement de déchets lors de procédés de fabrication de l'ammoniac?? Thank you

@@nesrinebenarab9958 No. I am sorry. I do not.

Ocean going ships

@@nesrinebenarab9958 they would use the waste products for farming and fertilizer.

Love

@@YouMockMe for whom?

It's Ruthenium

@@antonios7353 how is its availability

A useless stupid idea. Just to make the stupids dream.

In liquid form

@@Zeratul187 no, unlike ammonia, pure hydrogen and nitrogen are much harder to liquify, needs extremely high pressure and low temperature. The nitrogen gas are much heavier than H2, they should be vented below the containment. That mistake is so elementary.

lol no anhydrous ammonia is super dangerous they wont even sell it to you without a license and regular inspection of facilities this is more for industrial or off limits stuff like the application in the video

you're spot on, but I actually think they produce hydrogen from methane.

30%, efficiency

@@SurajKumar-vb1yu Not great...

People have been getting ammonia from piss for thousands of years.

“Currently, the round-trip efficiency of liquid ammonia is 11-19%, which is similar to the values of liquid hydrogen of 9-22%” source The Chemical engineer.

MOST likely platinum and iridium. LEAST abundant and EXPENSIVE....

Dude just came from other video about blue ammonia. Japan has been importing blue ammonia from saudi arabia aramco. They are going to be doing something on it soon.

@@Nayan-ic3ig only answer to pollution and problems is decrease in population and leading humble life

@@sridhardabu You first.

@@QarthCEO China had the answer to world's problems, but it failed for being biased

Making pure hydrogen is more expensive

The more detailed TCO modelling is usually required for particular cases, but for mission-critical operations (construction, remote off-grid permanent or temporary telco sites, military etc.) this would do the trick. Ammonia and hydrogen, in particular, won't solve all energy problems but they will provide quite workable and, as we progress with the scale, economic alternative to diesel generators or similar.

you buy it from the industrial plant that is synthetizing it from methane, nitrogen and / or hydrogen from water split electrolysis. and you keep buying it.

and how to separate hydrogen from a mixture of hydrogen and nitrogen

@@hardwaresoftware3131 that bits easy, heat the liquid. Le chatelier's principle will allow the reverse reaction of NH3 ->N2 + H2 to happen. But as you note, I would like to know which catalyst they are using.

@@galwitprifor001 thanks

Ruthenium kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p6ulp5qgksiZmI0.html

@@hardwaresoftware3131 totally 😎

It creates its own electricity because it can be used to make electricity

Yes they have working units

its got 40% of the energy of gasoline

@@mookfaru835 In case you mean this in a negative way, I wanted to clear up why this is actually fine; it may have 40% the energy of gasoline, but it allows us to produce electricity, which can be used much more efficiently for work than gasoline can. Gasoline can only be converted to work at around 35% efficiency at most right now in a car engine, while the cracked ammonia (Hydrogen) can be converted to electricity quite efficiently, over 90%. This makes ammonia viable for use as an alternative fuel equivalent to gasoline but with the benefits you get out of electric motors, like regenerative braking and lower cooling drag. Also, converting from multi-fossil fuel sources (natural gas, coal, oil, gasoline, diesel) to just ammonia and electricity gives you much more reliable infrastructure as the specialization leads to efficiency improvements in logistics, construction, maintenance, management, and science/engineering. Hope this helps.

PEM-fuel cells don't produce NOx or N2O. NOx and N2O are problems, when you combust ammonia in internal combustion engines, but not with low-temperature fuel cells.

@OMG OMG So, are you not doing the same in NH3? NH3 comes with a heavy cost while H2O is free to negligible cost...

@OMG OMG you guys dont talk the same language xD. You talk about pure hydrogen. The other guy asks about water. As seen in the video, when you got hydrogen and oxygen you can combine them which will generate energy and water (h2o). If you now want to split the water again, you need to input the same (or more) energy that you just generated to get pure hydrogen and pure oxygen. That's why you can't use water for this process. It's the "low energy end product" not the "high energy start product".

@OMG OMG H2 is highly flammable in only certain environments. You can shoot a H2 tank and not have any of it burn let alone explode.

@OMG OMG whilst I agree that using ammonia is superior in principle, the safety of it is somewhat disputable. Ammonia is irritating with high concentration exposure leading to skin and organ damage or even death. So safety needs to be thoroughly considered in situations where the container might be compromised.

@@levi4979 You can also vent a small amount and have it flash from static electricity or some unseen source. If you are burning pure hydrogen you probably wouldn't even see the flame, but you'll sure feel the heat.

That is the most common method, yes, however it is possible to produce through multiple catalytic processes powered off green electrical sources. The base components are just hydrogen and nitrogen, after all.

have a search about green ammonia

Input Process Output?

@@harshkatiyar8884 Initial Public Offering: when can we buy the stock.

Ya I also want to buy the stock.

😊😊😊😊

😊😊😊

😅😊😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

Search: "Make Ammonium Nitrate Nature's Way" (kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p8h3aJB-tJnJlac.html)

fish and chickens do for sure

yes!!

You sent me a message that maybe I posted on the wrong site. Maybe so, in that case please forgive me for being rude. Still, there are two problems here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mtiUd9di2NHNYX0.html

@@VeritasPraevalebit maybe this comment thread should be removed and reposted with an edit.

@@sagebias2251 For my part GenCell is free to to whatever they want with my comment. I am still certain that their description of the process is pure fantasy. So I predict that you will have to wait indefinitely for a prototype to materialize.

But, that said, I am a proponent for ammonia as a vehicle for transport and storage of sunshine energy.

Good comi z

Stack to make as much power as needed.

What do you mean? Please explain clearly!!