Ye I was confused why this had no likes at all then I noticed that this comment was just posted 🤭 But I don't watch your channel, sorry about that 😭, (but I saw you before) so don't mind me asking but did you thank her because you first started using the term 'Ancient' or because of another reason, like 'Ancient' being hardly used compared to other terms...? 😅 Sorry if asking this is considered rude! 😣

Hi! , Im a big fan of yours like every vid of you I've watch😍💗

Hey devil Bona!! Your really good at gacha too!!! :>

Omg hiiii

Hi

No this is a meme see the title.

@ meme’s are short, this is basically a mini movie

Lily turns everything into a mini movie. She makes it work and its pretty interesting every time.

LOL

Part 2 please

👍

People are starting to get so useless these days we need help from strangers- ;-;

@@lifora4391 you understand not all strangers are bad as your mommy said?

@@airitistic yes I do. :D

@@airitistic I'm not as stupid as you think.

Agreed

@Yui Hirasawa huh who were talking too?

@@marr6670 Their original comment was, "Effort lol? Not even a single bit just a stupid trend just like that" - @Xep

@Yui Hirasawa good you put them in their place🙄

@@Fundenlonden5 lmao they should try making one for themselves. Like i spent 2 hours on a gacha life mini movie and it was 5 minutes long like imagine how much time this took her!

Yesss

next: legendary hands

Next: Mythic Hair

@@CluelessNoah pretty sure I saw one for that

next on gachatube: legendary clothes

Yep it's literally almost the same

PuT oN a ShOwW mAkE oNe WrOnG mOvE aNd EvErYoNe WiLl KnOw

Most of what you said doesn't make sense, atleast to me, not trying to be mean

I have since come to new revelations regarding this issue. The main statistical calculation in my previous comment was very flawed. If ancient claws are 1 in a million (0.0001% of the population) and there has truly been 529 years in between ancient claw discoveries, then that means there has only been 1 million wolves in that 529 year period, whereas using my previous methodology I calculated there have been 52.9 million (which I mistyped as 59.2 million) wolves in that same period. This new value, according to my analysis previously would further prove this value of rarity to be even more likely to be inaccurate. However, there are more flaws in analysis that are to be discussed. One issue is with the percentages of claw rarities stated. I believe the 0.0001% prevalence of ancient claws was a mistake. Adding up the percentages provided for the other claws, there is 0.001% (1 in a hundred thousand) of the population remaining, implying the prevalence of ancient claws is actually 0.001%. The thumbnail of the video also says ancient claws have a prevalence of 0.001%, contributing to my belief that the 0.0001% prevalence was a typo. The thumbnail of the video also states that common claws have a prevalence of 60%, while the video itself says 65%, however I don't believe this discredits the my new belief that the prevalence of ancient claws is 0.001%, as adding up this just seems to be a typo in the thumbnail rather than a different set of data. This would, according to my previous analysis of results, would make it so there have only been 100,000 wolves in the last 529 years, further lending to my previous conclusions (according to the previous discussion, which I will attempt to refute) In my previous analysis, I stated "I feel that a classroom of 16 year olds would be given exact data". I no longer believe this to be true. I see no reason why exact percentages of prevalence are required, so I do not believe that the teacher saying the prevalence of different claw types are ABOUT certain values rather than ARE certain values lends any evidence to uncertainty in percentages. My previous analysis relied on the value of 529 years since the last report of ancient claws. This value is derived from the year of upload year of this video (2021) minus the year given by the teacher of the last report of ancient claws (1492). I believe that this is the best data value that can be determined from the information we are given, but I am not certain in it's accuracy. The use of the upload year of the video to be the year that the events of the video take place is a major assumption. The use of very modern technology (such as computers in the office at 3:22) lends evidence to this assumption, however as this story does not take place in our universe we cannot conclusively determine that this technology arises at the same time as it does in our universe. Another assumption is that the time of reporting of ancient claws would be an accurate measure of when these ancient claws arise in the population. To illustrate what I mean, as Valeria was 16 at time of when her ancient claws were first "reported", we can suppose that Valeria was born in 2005 and we can suppose that the previous wolf to be born with ancient claws (call this wolf Wolf X) was of the same age at time of "reporting" of their ancient claws, so was born in 1476. In this scenario, the difference between years of reporting of ancient claws and years of birth would be the same value. However, if we suppose that Wolf X's ancient claws were reported when Wolf X was of a different age, meaning Wolf X was not born in 1476, then the differences in years of reporting between Valeria and Wolf X would not be the same as the differences between their years of birth. This would mean that the differences in years of reporting, 529 years, would may not be an accurate value of the amount of years since ancient claws have last arisen. Despite these flaws in the value of 529 years, I do believe that it is the most suitable value that can be determined of the difference between Wolf X and Valeria's births. Using what I have just discussed, we can determine an uncertain value of 100,000 wolves being born in a 529 year period. As the wolves seem to age more similarly to humans than real life wolves, we can assume an average generation length of 30 years (similar to humans). This would give a wolf population about 5,900 every generation, likely meaning the wolf population at any given time would not exceed 15,000. I believe that this is a reasonable population value as the wolves are implied to only have one civilization. One potential issue with this idea is the advanced technology that the wolves have, which would be unlikely to be developed by such a small population. This, however, could be explained by there being other species in this world, with whom technology is shared, though their existence is never alluded to. In the situation that the wolf population could only be measured in the thousands at any given time, I do not believe that it makes much sense to be able to give a solid 0.001% prevalence value to ancient claws, as unless record-keeping for wolves stretches back tens of thousands of years, there would only be a few reports of ancient claws in history, not making a reliable set of data. This also does not account for the fact that ancient claws are likely more prevalent in society than is reported as, like in Valeria's case, ancient claws could be hidden and never known to the world. Assuming statisticians in the world of wolves accounted for this bias in some way, the wolf population could be much higher than I ascertained in my last paragraph while keeping the prevalence value of ancient claws the same as is thought. I do not believe, however, that such a specific percentage value could be determined. Another possibility to how the value of 0.001% prevalence of ancient claws was determined would be through analysis of the causes of claw types. What determines claw type is not directly stated, but claw type seems to be inherited in some way as it is stated that death claws are only found in royal families and that there is a "lineage" of wolves with death claws. Two explanations of the cause of this exist in magical lineage and genetic inheritance. The magical lineage theory cannot be deeply analysed due to its magical nature, but one possibility is that there is a magical essence carried by claws which is passed from parents onto their children at conception. In the situation of genetic inheritance, ancient claws could be a random mutation or there are a series of genes that predispose some to ancient claws which combine with environmental factors (likely in utero factors) to cause an individual to actually have these claws. Genetic inheritance cannot fully explain claws as there to seem to be clear magical powers associated with them, as can be seen in the last scene of the video. In conclusion, the prevalence of ancient claws in the wolf population is 0.001% and not 0.0001%. In the unlikely case that there truly were been no wolves with ancient claws in the time between 1492 and 2021, we can roughly estimate that the population of wolves would be measured between 5,900 and 15,000 at any given time, assuming a stable population. This population would be of reasonable size to perpetuate itself, though likely not enough to develop the level of technology seen in the video, so it is possible there are other intelligent species of higher populations with whom technological developments are shared. In the much more likely case that there are wolves with ancient claws who hide themselves from the world, and the 0.001% prevalence of ancient claws was calculated with regards to this, the wolf population could be much higher than I estimated, which would be more likely as, assuming the likely case that wolves are the only intelligent species in this world, their civilization resembles human civilizations, which have developed with much higher populations than my estimates of wolf population.

Lol

ikr

I wish you could put multiple chairs in

Lol ikr it's funnyyy

@@Vileplume87 you can go to edit object now press the object and now u can select a new object

Why did that just remind me of Cat noir

Yeah it was great it sounded like drums

@@paris5377 same

Me to 👀👄👀👈

Ikr

i was just thinking that

Yea

@@gacha_grapes5861 lol yeah😂

Me holding my bacon hair plushie scared shitless*

@@gacha_grapes5861 true 😂

@DAMIA MAISARAH BINTI ABDUL KHABIR Moe we know that 😑

@@gacha_grapes5861 XD

Lol 😂😂

Lol

Lol omg 😂😂

LOL

He needs grammarly

Lily already explained this in the description, u can go check it out

Ye

@@Alex-bp3if well you don't need to be rude. i also didnt know because i was just watching the video. somone said that she said it in the desc.thats it

I didn’t even need to read the description to figure that it was her nickname lmaoo

@@Sam-ig7ot yeah i didnt see it because I was very interested in the video lol

First

Hey thero Bᴏba :D

@AwakenLighFunkin bruh everyone knows😑😐

Ikr!

@AwakenLighFunkin ah ok -_-

*trans flag waves*

@@millz5403yas slay

It says its me (COMMAH) , yr mother and i want to speak to u

Yeah but they would ruin her life bcuz she would always would b on the run and she can't live a normal life

@@helxadrianx7876 yeah i agree with you, because she is that powerful she is always on the run and because everyone would want her powers they could kidnap her with alot of people. Even tho she is that strong she cant fight for a long time against alot of people if she is alone. Being powerful isnt being unstopable ^-^

Did you even watch the video? It clearly states that most royal families have the 2nd to best claws so a whole team obviously will destroy her

And if she is Emotianlly agressive then she might attack the huntere-

Yup what the kidnappers saying Kidnaps be like : o

I feel like ur everywhere now-

And so what? what is the point of this response??

you can finish the movie pls because so cool the storie

yes

@@cloudytroll518 i think its a joke lol

😂

*the best parents clearly*

So gorgeous that we want her to be like this…..F̵̦̺͕́̐͟O̵̷̪̰ͩ͆ͅŖ̴̪̈̄͞E̸̖̪̱͚ͨ̀͜V̷̬̈ͫ͢͢͝E̸̖̪̱͚ͨ̀͜Ŗ̴̪̈̄͞

*Baby turns blue* *Choked to death*

@@shrimpanzee123 parents death are avoided bc baby is dead 👍

Her character is actually quite selfish

@@hqru_877 how

IKR

@@hqru_877 what do u mean?

@@hqru_877agreed

Ikr

That is her nickname lol- and Valentina is her full name.

The person above me already said it! If you want you can check out the desc. Her real name and nickname are stated there. Note: If you ever notice a change of name or something confusing happens in a video, you can always check the desc/pinned comment. The answer may not always be there but it's worth checking. There are a few gachatubers who usually answer common questions about the story, character names or anything confusing in the desc/pinned comment! (. ❛ ᴗ ❛.)

@@lanirellechangedchannel7469 Okay ty!

Exactly

Saw what

si

2y’s…

How can 2 year olds learn "lol" ,and,how can they type💀 ​@@Mia21625

​@@Mia21625bruh like,you shouldn't have said 7 or 9 cuz 2 year olds don't know how to type

@@Reikunzzz no, this was two years ago….

@@Reikunzzz bro I meant how long the comment was this comment was two years ago so don’t

And then…. “Ancient feet”

And then ancient BA-

Ayoo?​@@JoseluisDecolorrosa

And then ancient body color

And then the ancient a-

Agreed

Mmm yeah let's get you outside girl

I called her Vodca

@Jasmine YT ☺︎ lol

Creator: I forgot her oh wait name maybe its Valentina

Lol

I call her “voca” dont ask why :)

Lol

She has inf power they even said it

Lol who reported me

Its not water it's the balcony it's just the color of water at night-

@@Kaeiajusttired that’s a building

Oh yeah it’s like a mix

Even there is part 2

Lol the comparison

….

Valerie: *has no control still and a short temper*

Yesss

I tried making a series and took a bunch of screenshots and the video ended up being 42 seconds long

Yeah ikr when it takes 5 hours to just film a single vid and it literally is 1 min

The reason she's overrated isn't how long it takes it's the ideas, this is literally a trend made into a mini movie

@@meko_27 she's not overated

@@notlxvender how so?

Same lol-

@EmilySeeMe bro me to

@@just_a_randomyoutuber 😂

Lol

Hello fever dreams

Lol

xD

A game that nobody plays

Stop lying i know you love her more than that

@@Justcallmeboots shut up

Kind? When was she ever kind?

Oof yeah lol hahahah

When you watch to much ladybug 👁👄👁✌✌✌

@I should die well i watched All the episodes. And i was just saying that to her to be funny.😒😒😒✌✌✌✌

holy crap my comment went viral

@I should die ME TO

So true

Is it just me or did the creator put a little ( *lots of drama from val* ) humor to the video 🤔

Yess I hope there is a part 2

Ikr-

Same

i thought it was like a trend vid just a small vid i wanted to watch this before my class . now me:*not realises that it's for 15mins also me:wait what why is my class so early T^T

Haha lol same😂

@@idkwhatmynameis2371 LOL XD

It said she's ALMOST 3 and it skipped 14 years later and she said she's 16.

@@SoonToBeSpringtrap OH that makes sense

Maybe it's her other name that's why it's valentina or it's a mistake.

@Yusuf Koca yeah i loved the movie and i love lily and i’m subbed but i just thought it was funny

@@ahhhhhhhhhhhh6013 in the desc it said her full name was Valentina and her nickname is valeria

I agree

Yes we need a part 2

Yes we do

I just saw this after I said that

techo died. he wasted all 9999999999999999 of lives

Me

What’s p2

Me too

@FloofyDoofy UwU oh

*Gacha logic has entered the chat*

*GACHA LOGIC*

they snatched the magic gloves from elsa's hand

NO ITS NOT THATT THEY JUST GRAB THE CLAWS FROM THIN AIR-

@@jolarssen8679 do the dew

It probably isnt

Plz make a part two I have been waiting for months

@Sea Sky she doesn't get enough views thats why. I mean why trouble yourself with all the work of making part 2 when you don't even get enough views 🙄

@Sea Sky she only makes part twos when she reached a Certain amount of likes. That video didint get to the point she wanted so no part two

@Sea Sky why would somoene make part two when barely anyone wants to see it. Just because one resin wants to doesn’t mean everyone does

Say E if you agree.

I know

right

I clicked faster then jame Charles can say hey sisters

@I should die Im concerned about your name, other then that yeah a bit confusing

.....

I thought she was 17 I'm ready for the wooshes

Shes 16 becouse the father said that shes ALMOST 3 years old which means she was still 2 years old. 14 + 2 = 16

@@sebacab Yeah

LMAO THATS WHAT I THOUGHTT

LMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLQMAOA.QMA,W

Your mail

Ikr

Realy

Fr

@hearty_bliss FROZEN

@@dreamy-chan7198 ive watched that movie over 50 times.

Don’t let them KNOOOOOW

Same

I know right??