Up you go!

i dont get it

@@Lak1148 Humor has another definition meaning, "a normal functioning bodily semifluid or fluid (such as the blood or lymph)." In the video the physician talked about the balance of 4 fluids in the body.

Alberta Malachi - Haha! 😆 Good one!

@@catiecodes which has been proved wrong

SACHIN SUNDARESAN science is history

Yaaa bro

Also Mathematics

Galen's theory of the physiology of the circulatory system remained unchallenged until ca. 1242, when Ibn al-Nafis published his book Sharh tashrih al-qanun li’ Ibn Sina (Commentary on Anatomy in Avicenna's Canon), in which he reported his discovery of the pulmonary circulation.

Even more so with epoche and gnosis

Me too

agreed

Super Science Friends?

Reminds me of regular show, for some reason

Me too,the voice is very soothing

Indeed an important year in human history!

The renaissance scientists continued where ancient Greeks had left off

Fausto Levantesi - Not so much of a coincidence as most think: Copernicus, Vesalius, Da Vinci, Rafael, Michelangelo, Galileo - and all the other Renaissance ‘iconoclasts’ - had direct access to Greek ideas which contradicted the orthodox Ancient Greek scientific canon that had long been accepted as unassailable in the Latin West. The 1204 sacking of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade, the subsequent ‘Frankish’ occupation of the Greek East, as well as the final Fall of Byzantium to the Ottomans in 1453, had a profound intellectual and cultural effect on Europe. For one thing, a huge influx of Classical Greek manuscripts and scholars made their way west, first to Italy, and eventually to other parts of Western Europe. The great scientists, artists, scholars, and inventors of the Renaissance, the Age of Reason, the European Enlightenment, and the Scientific Age, did not do it alone: they had direct access to Greek texts. Most of the ideas they investigated - from moral and natural philosophy, aesthetics, art, linguistics, literary criticism, political science, mathematics, mechanics, physics, astronomy, medicine, biology, even the much later theories of evolution and general relativity (!) - ALL had their origins several centuries before, in the intellectually audacious Classical Greek world, and in the culturally vibrant Hellenistic cities of the eastern Mediterranean. Much of that wisdom was lost for over a millennium, only to resurface in the West after the collapse of the Hellenized Eastern Roman Empire. It was this, more than anything else, which brought about the rupture with the old medieval worldview, and ushered in the European Renaissance and the modern Scientific Age: sine Graeci, nihil...

@@dorianphilotheates3769 nice!

They got reincarnated to fix their past errors.

Exactly my thoughts

This happens a lot less now thanks to the scientific method. Modern scientists are more conservative about declaring something as fact than they were in the pass. So *most* of what we know is probably true

@@gardenhead92 Still somemajor mistakes were able to pass on the mainstream in modern medicine, for istance a nobel prize was given to the inventorof lobotomy, an operation nowadays considered inhumane and cruel. That being said i believe that in the future we will be rediculed for the various forms of pseudo medicine like homeopathy

You mean like the global warming hoax?

the worst thing about this is that alot of people get ridiculed for thoughts of what could be

Galen's theory of the physiology of the circulatory system remained unchallenged until ca. 1242, when Ibn al-Nafis published his book Sharh tashrih al-qanun li’ Ibn Sina (Commentary on Anatomy in Avicenna's Canon), in which he reported his discovery of the pulmonary circulation.

System and Gaming use your inside voice, please

Your great grand grand kids will be thankful they didn't have to live like cave men did in 2020.

@blackapple89er *crazy coronavirus cures: BLEACH*

@Dexhead Cringe.

Hrs rolling in his grave

Galen deserves much criticism from historians. It is immeasurable how far he set back the advancement of medicine. How many lives lost as a result of his Cowshittery, over the ages? History's antithesis of Jethro Tull (not the band) when it comes to individuals most influential Earths current population? Course, now that we are about to hit 8 billion on this planet, maybe he really was a saviour.

Remember that period of 2 decades where taking it a chunk of someone's brain was thought to be a miracle cure?

Galen's theory of the physiology of the circulatory system remained unchallenged until ca. 1242, when Ibn al-Nafis published his book Sharh tashrih al-qanun li’ Ibn Sina (Commentary on Anatomy in Avicenna's Canon), in which he reported his discovery of the pulmonary circulation.

Thermotom bruh he was born in like 300 BC and he couldn’t analyze people like what did they expect. They should’ve changed it when they found out

My guess is they’ll laugh at you even having to cut open a person to do surgery one day. Like nanobots possibly doing surgery inside one day.

@@nicholaslewis8594 or we develop telepathy and start operating patients without cutting body 🤯

I doubt that, but then again predictions about what technology isn't possible seem to age poorly 😂

Actually bloodletting can help the human body with somethings, like iron desiquilibrium, high blood preassure and some infections

@@lucasmaicelilopes7057 Yeah, but bloodletting is not a cure it all like we once believed centuries ago.

For me it’s kind of a scary video because it shows how long we can co to use to believe something after it should have been clear it wasn’t true

Cool! Thanks for the knowledge!

Wow! That is so interetsing omg

@@muhammadabyanhafiz2369 no

lol

THE ODD1SOUT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes they were!

@@muhammadabyanhafiz2369 no

Yes.

How did he?

Though It was Ibn al-Nafis who discovered and described the pulmonary circulation .

Yes😌

@@hellothere5843 William Harvey proposed a closed circulation model for blood, proved that it was blood, not air that circulated between the lungs and the heart and described the importance of the veins' valves among other things.

@@tteottaninguiayami thanks for the info, I dont really know anything about the discovery of the circulatory system, so that info was pretty, well, informative Again, thanks! :)

Thank you. Some will just hate!

Sugar White exactly

For me, the title of the video is not misleading. It's quite like a conundrum. In the entire video, I analyze who's more worthy to be called as the most notorious doctor, and I supposed that it is Vesalius, not Galen who was feared and extolled during the ancient times. Just my viewpoint. ✌

a mistake is always unintentional :D

@@theali8oras274 notorious means famous, not bad due to mistakes

Agreed

That's modern dogma of science. Silencing and deplatforming everyone that doesnt agree with their current, always-right, set of laws. They are right in many instances such as global warming, but they still doesnt know anything, and pretend they do in their materialistic arrogance.

​@@ANJROTmania Scientists do not pretend that they know everything. That would be religion. Modern science requires freedom of speech but if someone doesn't agree with the currently accepted ideas they better have solid evidence to support their own ideas. If you simply state "That is wrong" without reason to believe it is and without offering an alternative no scientist will take you seriously.

@@vladomaimun I'm agree with you, Sir, about how science must work

Don't worry. The world still has north korea performing human experimentation for us, with China and Russia as its backup.

What if it is not?

@@Dimitri88888888 I usually leave unless I can be hooked in within the next 10 seconds. I come to this channel mostly just to listen to Addison lol

I guess you're the only one.

I prefer you to watch ASMR vids.

The minute you click, they get the view.. Job done! Doesn't matter if you watch till the end or not..

"Don't worry! It's malaria!" The most comforting thing a doctor could ever say to you.

"Come'n"?

@Dylan L How did you arrive at that number?

u got insta

Spot on, sir!

Ahmed Al Suwaidi yeah, who ever wrote this doesn’t really know medical history. A big disappointment.

😢

Bloodletting has benefits and does help with certain medical problems. If there isnt proper medical equipment for modern procedures, its not surprising a doctor would turn to bloodletting. "Doctors still use bloodletting, for instance, in cases of polycythemia-an abnormally high red blood cell count-and in a hereditary disease called hemochromatosis, which leaves too much iron in the blood." www.nationalgeographic.com/science/phenomena/2015/10/27/bloodletting-is-still-happening-despite-centuries-of-harm/

@@persephone3892 *How does reducing amount of blood reduce red blood cells and not white blood cells? At the end, you still have same equivalent.*

@@theotherside931 Not a doctor, but usually when done properly and not excessively, bloodletting can strengthen arteries and heart muscles (like donating blood). So by stressing the body/blood, it would create more white blood cells than normal, as the body does when you are sick or hurt.

This is likely why the practice happened for so long, because it actually might help you heal faster (depending on the illness), as long as the cut/opening doesnt get infected. Its kind of like when you work out, then youre sore, and after a few days your muscles heal and your muscles are stronger. (Im not recommending/encouraging the practice, just giving some insight.)

lmaooo i’m nigerian and i’ve never heard of that

Jokes on you it was recently proven useful.

Haha

O'SSÉIN - Master Your Mind With Me XD This is great

Why couldn't the bicycle stand up for itself? *Because it was a wimp.*

Right...

Indigo Fenrir Cuz it was winded? : D Cuz u like put air in the tires right? Im the worst at puns ;-; Im even confused by my own attempt at a pun XD

Garl Vinland 😂