Al Andalous a duré 711 à 1236 , puis il ne reste que Grenade j'usqu'a 1492 Donc les Musulmans n'ont pas gouverné L'Hispania 800 annes comme vous dites mais 525 annes , Grenade ne représente pas la péninsule IBÉRIQUE 😊

@@jojolafrite9265ni tan siquiera eso, desde el primer siglo empezaron a perder territorio desde Asturias en el 722 y después siglo a siglo, rechazados tras las fronteras del Río Duero, y así poco a poco. No fueron unas fechas fijas. La reconquista por los cristianos comenzó en Asturias creándose el primer reino cristiano asturleonés. En el siglo 8.

@@egutiguti3337 Tambien se dice que fué en 718 la derrota de los moros frente a Pelayo nuestro Heroe El camino fué muy largo , nuestros Ancestros lo consigieron en 1492 ....y las Americas por si fuera Poco💪🇪🇦✝️

@@NazarioOrbe En 1235 la péninsule IBÉRIQUE n'étais plus musulmane. Il y avait les Royaumes chrétiens comme le Portugal , Castille , Aragon . Les taifas a cette époque ils avaient rejoint les CHRÉTIENS. Et Grenade si elle a tenue deux siècles de plus , cet parceque elle payé des très forts impôts au Espagnols qui en 1492 prendra fin

@@jojolafrite9265 that isn't accurate, by the 9th century a chunk of Spain was already Christian (the north) and by 1031 a chunk of the country was christian already.

My family originates from a northern Spain too. No wonder I love Irish culture and music so much.

@@YmustTh3w0rldG0r0und It’s because our people are connected. There was a genetic study that revealed that Irish peoples DNA is closest to the northern Spanish. The Celts of Iberia fled to Ireland after Rome invaded the peninsula

@@uptown_rider8078 so then that means the Irish are Spanish not that the Spanish are Celtic.

@@clinkedylinkedy1 The Irish are genetically closest to northern Spaniards, which is from the Celtic tribes that lived in that region

Basque ,Native Californian and Irish 💜

Not very dark. They're a European group and had blue eyes.

Españoles y portugueses somos hermanos 😊

I think between a Persian and a Dravidian.

@@aag3752Basically people were darker before but you’re right. That’s why dravidians and turkics proto-mongols are your farthest cousins. As they’re indo-europeans too. Neolithic Farmers and Mesolithic Shepherds are brought from AfroAsiatics people group ( indigenous northern africans and mideasterns, first occupier of Southern Europe, Anatolia, Persians historical lands, and Horn of Africa )

Not that dark, olive skin maybe

basques are the closest modern people to the sardinians because of ANF dna plus WHG dna,. the Scythians were Indo-Iranic and most likely where red hair originated from. They contributed to more Northern and Eastern euro dna.

You and I should clarify one issue. Are you sicilian? In Georgian it means laught, and I didn't know if it was related to Iberia, but I knew that its name is a Georgian word.

That is interesting because the majority of the French who fled the Haitian Revolution (1790-1804) went to Cuba, the Orienté region, and Louisiana. You must be descended from French colonists.

Wouldn’t be surprised if the Welsh and Scottish ancestry actually counts as the Celts that inhabited the Iberian peninsula.

@TheBigdaddy64 Do you have grandparents or great-grandparents who were big landowners, Sugar can land owners? Because the french got themselves busy in Cuba, developing the land by themselves. Many got succesful and assimilated in the local Cuba créole bourgeoisie.

Millones de españoles emigraron a Cuba y Argentina en el siglo XIX, siendo cubano me extraña que no lo sepa, es más, a día de hoy todavía hay familias cubanas con familiares en España. El mismo Fidel Castro era medio español y tenía y sigue teniendo familia en Galicia. Lo que me extraña es que Vd. desconozca esto que es historia de antes de ayer.

By "getting themselves busy" I imagine you mean going right back to trafficking in and enslaving black people.

Glad you enjoyed it!

​@@AncestralBrewI would be interested for your services.

Ancient iron age iberians and the original/iron age monarchy/republican era romans / italics looked similar because they were both predominately ANF (anatolian Neolithic farmer)

this is incorrect. Spain is mostly celtic and western european. Italy is more Mediterranean with some dna from the levant. Spain is mostly R1b and Italy is usually J

Iberia is Georgia, country. Europe was already inhabited by Pelasgians, Etruscans, Picts, Basques, Celt-Iberians are Iberian people, today's Europe arose as a result of Indo-Europeans and Iberian people, Iberians lived there before Indo-European people.

Genomelink and all those sites are garbage and misleading. Illustrativedna is more accurate and its one of the only places you should upload your raw data to, along with gedmatch if you want and maybe codegen (for free detailed uncensored health report)

Spanish... or Hispanic? The percentage of Native American, West African and Asian (as a whole) is very strange in Spain... but very normal in Latin Americans.

​@@arkaitzetxeandia7542Hello Akaitz! I am Spanish, my entire family is from the Iberian Peninsula until a long time ago. This report refers to something very ancient, it would be from thousands of years ago. The thing about Asia on other pages does appear to me as Western Asia as more recent and the same to my mother. In My Heritage:86.9 Iberian (two groups);10 Italian not specified (Italy:Northern Italy,Switzerland,Austria,Monaco,a part of Northwest Albania);3.1 Western Asia not specified (Iran, Lebanon,Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan...).My Heritage (my mother) identical general percentage to mine. As a difference, she has 4 different Iberian genetic groups, 2 from France and 2 from Basque. We were surprised that it puts DNA in all of France already in the 20th century (it brings a timeline). It puts me, but further back. In Genomelink I get without specifying: 46% Northwest Europe (British, French, German, Irish or Scandinavian)39% Other European (Italy, Spain, Hungary, Albania, etc.)10% Eastern Europe (Estonian, Finnish, Russian, Polish or Ukrainian), 1% Asian, 1% African, 4% Arctic or Middle East. My mother gets more in Eastern Europe. In Tell me Gen it gives me 99.4% European, of which Iberian was 98.8%. I laughed a lot when I saw it. The rest put European Jew 0.6% and Egyptian 0.5%. I was amazed by this last one, but the percentages are so low that, well, I don't know.In My True Ancestry they seem to be more refined. In ancient towns, I especially have from the current area of the Balkans, Italy, France, Germany and the Iberian Peninsula. I obtained: Illyrios (39.7%). I believe this people is the basis of Spanish genetics, my mother and my husband (Galician) also have them in large quantities. I understand that they were in what is now Albania, Serbia... Etruscans, I believe, were an indigenous Italian people ( 20%), Romans of Hispania 8.3%, Aquitanians (French Basque Country area) 5.68, Rhaeti 5.32%, Gauls (French Celts 3.91%), Al Andalus does not specify 3.76%; Visigoths 3 .63%, Iberians 3.08%, Pannonian Illyrians 2.9; Daunii 0.86;Samnites 0.73; Scordisci 0.59; Corinthian Greeks 0.39; Macedonians 0.32; Vascons 0.2; Franks 0.17; Phoenicians 0.1 and Dacians 0.13. My mother is similar, except that she has increased the percentage of Visigoths to 8.3, Aquitanians 7.19 Gauls 5.47, also more Rhaeti, Franks and Iberians than me. Something appears to my mother that can explain Asia. Western Scythians and the Parthian Empire appear, so something very distant comes from there, but I suppose the most recent thing is that we share heritage with Eastern Europe and I think that is normal for a Spaniard, Spain was populated like that, although I have also I thought about whether there could be any gypsy ancestors that we had some genetic fingerprint on, but I have no idea. According to Genomelink, both my mother and I would also have Viking ancestors, according to what Iron Age England tells me, but I don't know how reliable this is. It gives me a Viking index of 65% and that I have Scandinavian Vikings especially and British ones. I see My True Ancestry as more real, but I suppose that everything is complementary and that we are a cocktail of ethnicities that makes us a good genetic historical puzzle.

​@@arkaitzetxeandia7542 Hello Arkaitz! I'm Spanish, my entire family is from the Iberian Peninsula until a long time ago. This report refers to something very ancient, it would be from thousands of years ago. The thing about Asia on other pages does appear to me as Western Asia as more recent and the same to my mother. In My Heritage:86.9 Iberian (two groups);10 Italian not specified (Italy:Northern Italy,Switzerland,Austria,Monaco,a part of Northwest Albania);3.1 Western Asia not specified (Iran, Lebanon,Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan...).My Heritage (my mother) identical general percentage to mine. As a difference, she has 4 different Iberian genetic groups, 2 from France and 2 from Basque. We were surprised that it puts DNA in all of France already in the 20th century (it brings a timeline). It puts me, but further back. In Genomelink I get without specifying: 46% Northwest Europe (British, French, German, Irish or Scandinavian)39% Other European (Italy, Spain, Hungary, Albania, etc.)10% Eastern Europe (Estonian, Finnish, Russian, Polish or Ukrainian), 1% Asian, 1% African, 4% Arctic or Middle East. My mother gets more in Eastern Europe. In Tell me Gen it gives me 99.4% European, of which Iberian was 98.8%. I laughed a lot when I saw it. The rest put European Jew 0.6% and Egyptian 0.5%. I was amazed by this last one, but the percentages are so low that, well, I don't know.In My True Ancestry they seem to be more refined. In ancient towns, I especially have from the current area of the Balkans, Italy, France, Germany and the Iberian Peninsula. I obtained: Illyrios (39.7%). I believe this people is the basis of Spanish genetics, my mother and my husband (Galician) also have them in large quantities. I understand that they were in what is now Albania, Serbia... Etruscans, I believe, were an indigenous Italian people ( 20%), Romans of Hispania 8.3%, Aquitanians (French Basque Country area) 5.68, Rhaeti 5.32%, Gauls (French Celts 3.91%), Al Andalus does not specify 3.76%; Visigoths 3 .63%, Iberians 3.08%, Pannonian Illyrians 2.9; Daunii 0.86;Samnites 0.73; Scordisci 0.59; Corinthian Greeks 0.39; Macedonians 0.32; Vascons 0.2; Franks 0.17; Phoenicians 0.1 and Dacians 0.13. My mother is similar, except that she has increased the percentage of Visigoths to 8.3, Aquitanians 7.19 Gauls 5.47, also more Rhaeti, Franks and Iberians than me. Something appears to my mother that can explain Asia. Western Scythians and the Parthian Empire appear, so something very distant comes from there, but I suppose the most recent thing is that we share heritage with Eastern Europe and I think that is normal for a Spaniard, Spain was populated like that. According to Genomelink, both my mother and I would also have Viking ancestors, according to what Iron Age England tells me, but I don't know how reliable this is. It gives me a Viking index of 65% and that I have Scandinavian Vikings especially and British ones. I suppose that everything is complementary and that we are a cocktail of ethnicities that makes us a good genetic historical puzzle.

Por el clima, iban huyendo de la glaciación.

Just cultural, like the Arabs

@@gundissalinus 🥂

Pues que fue cultural más que genética.

These Phoenicians had no genetic influence, they were just traders. Even in their wars, they relied on the Iberians, Berbers, and Gauls.

The Vandals were a Germanic group from Northern Europe that in the time of Rome's fall, migrated to Iberian Peninsula and later to North Africa. Actually the name Al-Andalus means "Land of the Vandals".

That’s because Spaniards don’t have moorish ancestry, they were all kicked out of the peninsula when we took back our land

Another Troll 🤣🤣🤣🤣

​@@uptown_rider8078Viva Espana

The moors were in Spain for 800 years, you mean not one mixed their dna with a Spaniard in all that time?

@@TheAll5555 The only way they would have mixed their DNA would have been through r🦍, but the Iberians did not want to mix with enemy invaders that stole their land

hahaha make sure you guys tune into the right language

@@AncestralBrew alright bro

@@AncestralBrewwhy are you in Spain?

@@4bidden1 It was the most logical choice after Brazil. I’ve got a visa now so I can’t leave until I get my residency card, so I’m locked in for the next couple months.

@@AncestralBrew nice. Consider doing a video on Neanderthal genetics..if they were still alive today, would people still consider them a separate species?

Yup!

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aNZ5apqdnd2mZZc.html is in German

Gypsies are barely 1.5 - 2% of the population of Spain... and they have always lived quite segregated.

@@arkaitzetxeandia7542 thats not true. There have been over 600 years of shared history. Plus there are tons of groups of Mestizo people that in Spain mean mixed Spaniard and Roma. It may not be talked about in the history books because of racism but Roma influence is strong and current. Flamenco is a Roma art form.

@@arkaitzetxeandia7542 no community is a monolith. We are all converging worlds and stories. Traditional known info is just part of the story.

@@clinkedylinkedy1, Gypsies have been around for just over 500 years ALL OVER EUROPE, in fact Spain is one of the last countries on the continent to which they arrived. No "Strong influence". Where I live, in the Basque Country, there are hardly any gypsies, I have never met any in my personal circle... and I am already 56 years old.

The Berbers did not mix with the Romans, but always lived outside their control, even if their land was invaded.

87% + 23%, the sum is 110%. Some information is not correct.

Oooops 77% from different locations in southern Europe mostly Spain and 23% from different locations in Mexico. Details too many to list. @@arkaitzetxeandia7542

No. Los Hispanos hemos superado al Nazismo con nuestra genética. No volvera a pasar.Y si nos pinchan fundaremos una nueva Unión Transoceánica Hispana con sedes en Lima, Veracruz y Madrid uniendo politicamente a 300 millones de hispanohablantes con un pasado común.

If any, they should be the only politics.

basques are bascially sardinians with western hunter gather admixture. Mostly ANF

​@@michaelcandido2824No, they're also heavily Indo-European, compared to the Sardinians, around 25%

A lot of people believe that, but it isn't proven. There are theories saying that the Vascons and Aquitanians (ancestors of the Basques, Gascons and Aragonese people of the Pyrenees) are connected to the Georgians, and/or possibly the Chechens, the Ingush or the Circassians. I remember reading a compared vocabulary list of Chechen and Basque a while ago, but I lost it sadly. I think that there might be some truth to it. Southern Europeans are descended mainly from the Early Neolithic Farmers from Anatolia (only the Basque still speak their language though). I know that some linguistic and genetic studies linked the Anatolian people and also the Minoan people with the Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers. Likewise... many people mocked the Romans for the theories regarding descending from Trojans and same for the Etruscan being descended from people from Anatolia, but modern genetic data tend to confirm fringe theories like this more and more. So... nothing is impossible.

​@@michaelcandido2824 They're closer to the British Islanders than they're to Sardinians.

This is likely but Lazaridis reckons Dzudzuana is somewhat distinct to CHG. His 2018 paper states a distinct cluster in the Caucasus. CHG effectively forms with migrating ANE groups . Dzudzuana though in his paper is stipulated to be very anciently related to the villabruna cluster which encompasses WHG. AHG would follow suite, intuitively having more basal Eurasian ancestry. This is info off the top of my head and may need revision so let’s keep the discussion open.

@@AncestralBrew Isn't CHG just ANE + Dzudzuana + basal Eurasian, maybe with a lot of drift due to long isolation in the Caucasus mountains? And WHG are some sort of heavily drifted Dzudzuana?

@@AncestralBrew Interestingly, there is also archeological evidence that the Aurignacian culture was spread from Europe to the Middle East. I think all those hunter & gatherer groups we label AHG, WHG and so on were initially Aurignacians.

@@AncestralBrew Btw it would be cool if you mentioned some of these populations as being part of the Levantine genepool as well, because they are. For example, all Lebanese have Eurasian Steppe ancestry and Anatolian farmer. Many of us (if not all) have a small amount of WHG, though this would probably be because of European admixture. But those three are there, and my point in mentioning this is to show that we're all more connected than we think. Esp. when it comes to Europe, the Caucuses and the Levant (at least as far as Lebanon).

all the people from that area form the caucasoid ethnic group. Europeans,Middle easterners, Jews and west asians are basically related because thats where those people intially came from before they went their ways. Even northern Euros share some commonality with North Eurasians which means they are cousins of siberians and native americans because they share a common ancestor indirectly.@@freepagan

yesss

ancestry is the best hands down

Están mal y no son precisos los test de adn que se toman la mayoria de norteafricanos (los resultados comerciales de myheritage son basura, ni caso). Si se tomasen 23andme como tú anotarían 100% norteafricano. Y si su te tomases el test de myheritage que es muy impreciso anotarías algo de norteafricano probablemente, lo mismo que ellos anotan algo de ibérico. No sé si me entiendes. Está fatal y cuentan ancestria muy antigua como si fuese moderna.

Cuando los Moros fueron espulsados del Norte de España llevaron consigo adn Iberico, además de que los Bereberes de Marruecos parecen tener mezcla Iberica

@@cmt160 hubo flujo genético en ambas direcciones

@@user-yt3xd2jl6dsi, y en el resultado comercial de 23andme está incluido en los porcentajes de o bien “spanish&portuguese” o de “north african”, ya que te muestra la ancestria reciente y no la antigua

@@cmt160 los de la expulsión de los Moros ocurrió hace solo 500 años, periodo de tiempo en el que los test se consideran válidos

You might be thinking of Sephardic Jews.

That's likely - Thanks. And is there a significant genetic mixture among the Spanish? @@ramonacosta2647

Sefarad means spain in landino. The name Iberia comes from a river

@@juliegautreaux4087 The name Iberia comes from the greeks, genius

The name Iberia comes from a river, and that is how it was called by the Greeks. There also lived on the peninsula a people called Iberians... something that everyone who has read a little knows perfectly well.

Turks are not from Turkey they are way from East Asia

@@julybeeb4614 Modern day Turks largely descend from people who were already living in Anatolia (such as Greeks, Armenians and other Indo-European people) BEFORE the arrival of Seljuk Turks, there was never a population replacement. Seljuk Turks (who were a powerful minority) mixed with local Anatolians. The local population of Anatalia was simply Turkified and that is precisely why modern day Turks look nothing like Kazakhs, for example.

​@@Ogeroigres seljuk are half east Iranian

Modern anatolians are heavily armenoid admixed so not really. If anything, iberians (as well as all west meds, especially the sardinians) most closely resemble the ancient neolithic anatolians (ANF).

@@cmt160 Sardinia.. Only. Iberia especially Portuguese have 15% Nord African DNA Italy have 28% Caucasus dna

Its because most “celts” aren’t really celtic in terms of autosomal dna but bell beakers who got celticized culturally and spoke celtic language because the real actual celts who came from the same source as the earliest italics conquered them (La Tene/continental celts from Austria/Alps). So yeah most “celts” in popular culture such as the hispanic/iberian celts (such as the cantabrians as well as the celtiberians ofcourse) and the insular celts (british isles ones, britons&gaels) are really just genetically bell beaker populations, the northern ones being more steppe admixed (WSH) while the southern ones being more neolithic farmer (EEF). Bell beakers were IE speakers themselves but not of the celtic branch, just a whole dif branch. I believe lusitanian language was one of those original bell beaker IE languages.

The Romans conquored the lusitanians fairly easily, so much so that they assimilated their language completely. The Vasconians, the ancestors of the Basques, on the other hand they took the longest to conqueor. The Basques are the only people of Iberia to not be assimilated completely as they still have their language.

Multiracial societies are artificial and have to be artificially maintained through a police state.

He talked about Anatolian farmers which are half of Spanish DNA

They left little legacy, the punics (carthaginians/phoenician). I don’t deny it, im myself from the region they left the most legacy both archeological and genetical but i think the latter is 98% due to the romans and the later imperial migrations, rather than because of the Punics themselves.

They left little to no genetical legacy.

😂😂😂

Nope

@@deanoal933 Yes there was a study that confirmed. They actually have more Sephardic than North African admixture.

Strange enough, my DNA shows Ashkenazi with my mostly Hispanic ancestors.

⁠@@salvadormartin4203 DNA results largely depend on the reference populations that the DNA testing company uses. If they have a smaller reference population it won't be as accurate at identifying a region. The test might confuse some parts of your DNA because they look similar. Also when you see regions in your results, it can include admixtures. So another company might have Sephardic but the one you used didn't say it because that makeup was not uncommon for their gene pool of another region if that makes sense. Or maybe you do have an ancestor with it, you'll just have to do more research.

Spain don't accept nor africa, arab, or sephardic jew because ashamed

amerimutt.jpg

Pero qué broma es esta……. Estás hablando en serio….😳 😮😢

Es broma. Aqui en EEUU, muchos Americanos blancos quizás no muy educados cren que todos los hispanohablantes son Méxicanos.

@@egutiguti3337, no, es el típico troll.

Yes! One can easily see the mulatto look of you, by way of your features.

It was just a cultural influence

@@FREEd5407 some Jordanians have an Arab component but they aren't original from Arabia they are did ethnicity similar but different with similar cultures

@YadinZedek777, Not sure about the Spanish but the Portuguese share more with the Egyptian Copts and Egyptians in general according to the 23 & Me estimates I've seen. But when it's present it's less than 1%. I do come across a few Y-DNA samples with origins in the Arabian peninsula but much less than North African. North West African is much more common than anything from the Middle East but still a small percentage.

@@afaria6173 I appreciate your response, it's very informative for the video, but my question is more so where is the video for Arabs and Jordanians

They did certainly look better than your average modern human because they were less or not degenerated at all due to bad nutrition. But that goes for all ancient human groups really, not just the Indoeuropeans/aryans. I bet even the farmers looked more like “models” than modern people on average.

@@cmt160 Bollocks! They had the same share of unattractive people as anyone else and probably a lot more scarring and deformities than we have today.

⁠@@cmt160if anything we look better than those ancient populations. Average indi-european was like 5’8 meanwhile average farmer was like 5’3

Anatolian neolithic farmer heritage, maybe influence of Phonecians too. But northern Spaniards look nothing like Lebanese or Syrians.

I live in Spain and know many Lebanese people in Australia. They are rather distinct phenotypically to eastern meds. A misconception is that Spaniards resemble other Mediterraneans like Italians and Greeks who for the most part share some similarities with Eastern Mediterraneans. The Spaniards however, with their additional WHG ancestry are more like the southern French and northern Italians, with a distinct Celtic admixture profile.

In reality, Spaniards and Portuguese have very little Middle Eastern DNA. Italy and Greece have way more, for example. Just because they tend to have dark hair and brown eyes, doesn't mean they look Middle Eastern.

there is some overlap due to high Anatolian farmer in both population but still for the most part even the Dark Spaniards/Iberian still look more " western " than eastern due to higher WHG and higher steppe ancestry for example typical dark Spaniards live.staticflickr.com/8424/7757560928_ae94f6ec88.jpg typical Eastern med Levantine sernooa.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/0FACC5E4-E63B-4466-948B-5FBF92CDD971.jpeg

​@@Ogeroigres Portuguese are darkest. As Indian Spain Italy greek look white for us