Exactly

Say the same to all "alternative archeologist " and their theories. Say it loud!

I dont have the space land time money or materials. But i could

@@mikekasich836 i can teleport... i just wont show you!

Agree. You might want to add the requirement that these ivory-tower academics who claim they have "solved" the mystery build the same sized walls without the use of modern cranes, airplanes or any electric machinery and also quarry the huge rocks from far away transporting them over mountains, rivers and valleys. lol.

I saw another vid on this, and the guys claimed the Inkas had "since forgotten and lost tricks and methods", and since they did it so much they were experts at it. VERY SCIENTIFIC EH? LOL. Fact is, the Inkas could not have done it.

I know a guy named Michaelangelo made statues far more intricate and complicated than these interlocked blocks. I know he did it with a hammer and chisel. That does not mean that I can do what he did if I had a chisel and hammer.

@@furtim1 they statue that you're referring to is tiny tiny tiny compared to Machu Picchu. Do you understand what this fact implements? I doubt it because people now have the same IQ as their pet dog. And dogs do not understand size.

@@donniebaker5984 I doubt very much you are a real person, rather than a bot. Still, I will respond. Having seen both in person, I assure you that I do know the difference in size between some boulders at Machu Pichu or Tikal and the statues of ancient Greece or the Renaissance. However, this video isn't about the movement or placement of the materials, but the care and exactness of the carving. Carving a 10 ton block into a really well shaped blob is not any more miraculous than carving 3 ton block into a beautiful woman on a chariot of fire. It is just a matter of tools, skill, and time. So, what was your point? That they aren't the same mass? Yes. Agreed.

We don't do it now because it's a massive convoluted balls ache. This doesn't mean that it doesn't work. They used very specific kinds of stone in very specific ways for a purpose, their infrastructure was geared towards facilitating and supporting this methodology. Our modern world largely doesn't.

Actually it is being used. It's called ferro cement construction.

I came over to this video from a video of a guy moving 10t blocks only using "sticks and stones" and his bare hands in an attempt to build his own Stonehenge but mostly because he likes to move heavy objects like whole barns and massive stone blocks 😄 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e5ugjZqmt5zaaJc.html

Strictly hypothetical if you ask me they can't even figure out how they moved all those megalithic stones

they probably fused smaller rocks with the same technique, like, they made the "massive" rocks on the spot.

@@andreasneu302 I saw this video,too...what an amazingly simple method he employed

@@Manny_El_M1.1 we'd notice if they did that..it would be obvious.

Grinds my head in.

This is a real guy

He sounds like a preacher at times

this is a real person

Around the 5th minute I came to comments to see if anyone else was having trouble with the sing-songy up and down infection every 5 or 6 words. It very unfortunate that this is happening as I will try to have to find the info on how the walls were built...someplace else if I can.

They were all "Conan the Barbarian" guys 🙂

50 tons is just over 100.000 pounds ! But I still don't think itb was done this way, untill someone builds a bit of wall to prove it

They can't do their theory even with brick sized stones so what does that tell you.

Yeah I am not convinced either, like how did they cut the stone with other stone? How they transport the stones? How did they lift and set them? This theory is full is holes

@@James-to7pi carbon dating from substances found inside the pyramids confirm that they are about 5000 years old, which is actually older than zahi hawass would like them to be, but not even close to 12000 years. thats just stupid.

Exactly. I wish I was not so obsessed with this topic in general. it is going on forever, but no credible explanations, or restrictions on information. Its so obvious something RADICAL was afoot everywhere for millenia(ago and lasted for). i'm getting tired of hearing the same ol' shizz, basically. Maybe I must just make peace with the fact that as brilliant and as advanced as our technology is we may never know the answers. So far, its moving that way. NEVER know. Imagine that? So impossibly advanced those marvels of past civilisations were, that we may never know their secrets. Scary stuff. Those builders all over the planet I think were here 100's of thousands of years ago. So long ago we have zero reference for where to start. Millions of years ago perhaps. All starting to look like something like this. Ancient ancient ancient ancient civilisations that only left these marvels of their civilisations out of the fact that they needed them for whatever reason. We got no clue at all. The research by us, tells us this. We are literally clueless. Imagine who these people were? Scary stuff. Time to get our heads out of our....(u know what I mean).

Place and remove several times? If you would be trying to duplicate the same construction with an ordinary housebrick you would have to do it at least fifty times with todays tools. Then. Who knows howmany times. Its looks like as though 'they' had heated the stone to a plastercene consistency and then moulded them into place. Way too many unanswered questions that even the most experienced and knowleable stonemasons today have no idea

The blocks were not cut or carved. They were poured into place. They are concrete walls. So, no cutting, no transport and no fitting impossible angles together. Using formwork they poured each 'block' into place in situ. It's a simple answer that has been kept secret until now.

@@nephos100 Did you miss the bit where he explained which kinds of stone were used? Clearly there have been tests conducted to identify the type of stone in each block. And they certainly didn't grind feldspar, granite, etc into a fine paste, mix it with a binding agent, and then pour it into place.

@@HowlinWilf13 Didn't miss any bit. You are certainly right about that one thing: "And they didn't grind feldspar, granite, etc into a fine paste, mix it with a binding agent and then pour it into place." That's spot on. They certainly didn't do it that way.

@@nephos100 Nephos, It's an interesting thought but it is very easy test the rock to see if it is concrete, I hope someone has already done that. My understanding on that topic is that they know where the Stone quarry is. However, making forms is another technology. I'm not saying that they did not have that technology But, I would think that the idea of conservation of energy ,time ,materials and craftsmen would create even greater pressure on the population.

Whenever I look at this finely jointed masonry I get the feeling they were showing off their skill. It's almost like they were leaving a message to future generations: "Lets see if you can figure out how we did this!".

@@martinharris5017 from what I've learned here about this subject is that its only on one side that everything looks perfect and behind the walls they used smaller fill in rocks.

@@ericabarca5871 You understand correctly: It's all about the appearance of perfection. Same is true for Great Pyramid in Egypt. Nevertheless it's still extraordinary workmanship considering what they had at their disposal. I've yet to see any experts today replicate either the technique or the style, and certainly not on this scale. AND it's survived hundreds of years of seismic disturbance.

@@martinharris5017 This video was quite compelling. Acids are very interesting. Apparently, Incans had abundant access to acid... LOL Seriously, it is definitely a compelling argument as to how the Incans did it.

@@thomassicard3733 I have many hundreds of old books in my home library. can't remember which one, it might be Exploration Fawcett possibly, but there is a story related about some Western explorers in the Brazillian region who found a very old bottle with a stopper in it. Thinking it might possibly be an alcoholic brew but not wanting to test it, they asked one of their porters, a local native, to take a swig. he refused to do so and protested that it wasn't for drinking. In the altercation the bottle was knocked over and the fluid spilled onto a rock. As the men watched in amazement, the surface of the rock began to soften. Over the years I've read and heard numerous anecdotes about acidic substances being used to soften and sculpt rock, and it certainly explains much about the smooth, sculpted look of South American monuments and masonry. I've always believed the claims had substance to them, and these latest findings appear to vindicate the stories and explain the material evidence.

Yes I was thinking it would be quite interesting to see if it can be reproduced. Something like that would need to be crowd funded though, and it would take quite a bit of money and human physical and mental power to get the job done, I'd think.

@@MrRecklessryan Yeah i suppose you're right.

Very good point by Daryl. Sounds like a very easy experiment to replicate. Trial and error, find a compound that will soften rock. If the Inca could do it, then modern science labs should be able to do it too.

@@MrRecklessryan Yep, I totally agree with that statement. One way to "soften" stone is to toss it into a volcano and wait till it melts. That's the easy part. The hard part is reaching into the molten magma with your bare hands and picking it back out again. (grin)

@@MrRecklessryan No you would have to fit at least 3 stones together. National Geographic and the Smithsonian could fund it, but they will not because they cannot do the precision stone fitting.

Yep, and until they have recreated it, it's just a theory

Researchers have at least recreated the paste and fused rocks together using the same chemical you'd find in the red mud. The rocks seal together with a similar smooth, glassy texture found in incan ruins. It's known today, as part of popular tradition in andrean natives, you can mix the red mud with an additive extracted from local tree sap (containing oxalic acid). The oxalic acid makes the already potent naturally occurring acid 10x stronger.

@@wolfumz what's the paste called?

@@wolfumz I've been to these ruins. Many of those rocks are the size of an SUV yet the surfaces fit perfect. The Incas didn't even care if the stone was not square. In 2020, we cant even get the fender gap anywhere near as precise on that SUV using computer aided methods. Having acid paste is one thing but I challenge anyone to physically try to do this on rocks 1/10 the size.

​@@Salty.Peasants I do not know the name of the paste. Several sources call the clay used “llàncac allpa”. I don't know a specific plant, but early chroniclers report a plant was mixed in to the red clay mortar. Oxalic acid is naturally occuring in many leafy plants, it is not a rare chemical. When it is mixed with sulfuric acid between stones, the oxalic acid decomposes, releases heat, and reacts with silicates in rocks. Heating the mixture increases the potency, and the reaction could have been self-heating. You can free English language research on the topic by searching the author's name: "HELMUT TRIBUTSCH". Early chroniclers of Incan construction said workers would lift and drop the same stone many times into place before it was fitted. No cranes, no pulleys, no ruler, no square, no beasts of burden, no iron tools. Hard to imagine.

These blocks, their size aside, are nothing compared to stoneworks that we know for a fact were made with hammers and chisels, like Michaelangelo's statue of Moses. Is your position that one person with a chisel can make that statue in a few years, but thousands of people with chisels cannot make odd shaped blocks that fit together?

@@furtim1granite blocks carved with copper or stone chisels….sure bud.

As with most professionals in any profession, it holds also for archaeologists, most of them are dogmatic fools.

It must have been done by advanced atlanteans, or Atlantis survivors after the younger dryas global cataclysm who fled to peru and influenced the natives and showed them how to do it, Graham Hancock knows just listen to him

@@silverbackag9790 It's been done.

Hahahahaha

I asked the same question, they didn't like it!

It is not rock snd for this kind of thinking from the start , you'll never figure it out !

Yes go out and build stones walls just like them then I'll believe them

I would like to see anyone, with any modern method cut these blocks. I’ll wait

And how did they transport those hugh rocks (100 metric tons and more) from 200Km away to the construcción place????

I THINK I appreciate your sense of humour..Lol. Its not helping tho....We need answers! (joking)

Wow

Hahahahaha!!!!. Best explanation I've heard so far!. (You forgot one thing, the amount of shit involved in gluing these huge blocks together!).

@@ICU10 I thought you had that shit covered Bro . . . Ok then, I would like to buy a vowel & my final answer is (drum roll please) STICKY RICE!

@@jamesmaxdavissands 🤣

The best artisans/craftsmen always know just how many cigarettes to smoke between stages of the work... ;-)

Yeh, nice photos of the great stone walls. But absolut nothing more than speculation around how it was buildt. I think that is something ewerybody with a camera and fantasy can do

Me too. Sounds doable.

Well Brian Braden. I think you made a wicked statement. The video makes it all sound simple . but no one will take up your challenge as the professionals no it can't be done

Don't to forget to hire some movers!

Yaba Daba Doooo…...

Andy Body that is why the dark ages lasted so long ..not about Fred but all about you

LOL

It is so repetitive.

As interested as I was in the subject matter I bailed after 4 min. because of his annoying delivery.

I tried watching it with auto generated captioning turned on and the volume turned right down, but it is still annoying.

More than distracting. A-PHAHCKn-nnoying.

The reader just is not able to read aloud understanding at the same time the meaning or what he is reading. I am at 5th minute and there is still a "preparation" for genius idea. Already am thinking that the final will be disappointing (as usual for that type of "eureka") So why to suffer?

If that doesn't bother you enough listen to a few Aussies and Kiwis whose inflection goes up at the end of each sentence. It'll drive you nuts. Every sentence sounds like a question, not a statement.

It is just that it is the exact same inflection every time. It sound disingenuous, as if he isn't speaking about something he really has thoughts or feelings about. This just isn't how a normal person would talk normally about something. After enough videos you kind of stop noticing it for the most part, but it can be distracting.

I thought I was the only one who finds the constant inflections annoying. I can't take it, lol. I find myself saying the statements out loud and realizing that it's not that hard to not emphasize every statement the same way every single time. Don't get me wrong I like the fun theories this channel produces, the lack of scientific evidence is an issue, but it is just someone pumping out content. Yet, the inflections are just so annoying I have never made it through an entire video. For me it keeps from being engaging.

Maybe it's a program that reads text? Anyway, fucking annoying.

lol 3 minutes in and it became so grating and i anticipated it at the end of every sentence, which is distracting as hell. takes serious willpower to listen to the end. had to scroll the comments to make sure it wasn't just me.

Do not watch. I’m not going to anymore

Yes, his speaking tone is very annoying. I shut it off and read the captions. Ugh.

I’m sick and tired of these LImey Queerdos Narrating

Sounds like he's weighing options. THIS way or THAT way, see-saw, up and down. Or he's bored that he has to read this text that he's heard a million times.

😂 Yeah it certainly sounds like he's reading a really boring book to us.. I think good speaking is a skill that can be trained (don't think I possess it either...) but at least he has the skill of coherently and vividly presenting research, so I personally can overlook the repetitive tone. I see it more as a channel trademark by now

foot lettuce

....OR, I'm Putting my self to sleep. With every word. And every sentence. That doesn't end. When I end the sentence.

Yes, but the problem with that theory is that they haven't located the remains of the bags. If they found that, then it would explain quite a lot.

How much are the aliens paying you

Irritating more like it

..maybe computer generated....hard to tell on YT today.

@@Firebrand55 - no computer generated voiceover could be that horrible. I have pity for anyone that knows him in person.

@Vadim VeeVoit your full of crap

@Vadim VeeVoit Dude if you can replicate these walls you will be rich, imagine all the rich snobs that would adore a stone fireplace in this style. You should look into the use of acids in repositioned stones like in the article. Perhaps just use sulfuric acid instead.

That's why it's called a theory. One side actually tries to prove a way it could have been done, the other side knows exactly how it was done, aliens

Exactly. No idea whatsoever.

Thanks, saved me 19 mins

Yes, but we MAY be one step closer to understanding how it was done. ...maybe those mentioned protrusions are a hint as to how they were placed and/or transported. I sure like this line of logic a LOT better than aliens or whatever, BUT since we haven't definitively solved all of these world-wide architectural mysteries, I'm gonna listen to all of the theories; even Aliens! I'll also say, "This one is pleasing my brain".

The stones are actually a form of concrete that’s poured into a mold giving them the exact shape they needed.

it's bad; however, the information is useful and gives a practical answer to something I've been wondering about for a while. Not only is the delivery flat, it could easily be cut down to three or four minutes.

The sound gives new meaning to monotone , please do not take up a second hobby in musical arts a 3-4 note song would not be pleasant either . great subject matter, but feels like my biology teachers class all over , i fell asleep in there sometimes also

You are so right. This man should listen to himself and then shut up ever after...

i agree...it is irritating as fuck...i know this dude isnt married.

I couldn't agree more. See comment above... Ted Watson

I think or hope you mean two cents.

Spoiler alert no one has because its theoretical nonsense.

Me too,talk is cheap!

Agree, just a theory. Never heard anyone has tried this ever in modern times. How were they able to move this highly acidic material from modern Ecuador to Chile, wherever you find those colossal stones with perfect joints, of course it's not only Sacsayhuaman. Also, never read either anyone has ever moved those monster rocks from their location to confirm how they fit with side rocks. How did they come up with essentially a 3D free form model to chisel out of rock, and lift to a perfect fit, that remains the question.

I was thinking the same thing, seems like it would be easy to replicate.

Don' hold your breath...

​@Steve Warlee The proper term is "soilcrete" or "dirtcrete", and it was used to build roads in the USA. low-percentage cement mixed with local soils, a relatively small amount of water when compared to concrete, and compacted really well. You don't have to believe me, you can search on youtube by yourself. Also known as "rammed earth". Here's are videos, as proof: "Paving with Soil Cement (1962)" and "Soil Stabilization with Cement (1959)". KZfaq codes are: *DkbMGm44xYc* , *5ATbLDLtwCs* .

@Steve Warlee Thanks! The people who explain those things often explain them for the people who already know lots of things, and just need to tie the loose ends, or people who are going to do research by themselves. Those topics would get a lot more believable if they used real-life mainstream-approved techniques and technologies which were already in use for many years. I think a channel focused on categorizing information strategically so people can understand how the "conspiracies" are a lot less "theories" and a lot more "fact", would have a lot of success. But someone needs to put in the work, for that to become reality.

@Steve Warlee There is such a thing as ash cement, or cement made from ash, so by simply saving up that ash, they could make such bricks.

​@Steve Warlee No, I'm talking something which is supported by science. Ash can be processed into cement. It might not be comparable with modern cement, or even with limestone, in terms of cement properties, but there's also the mainstream process of making highways out of cement and soil/dirt. Here's a video you can watch, to see the exact process for ash-cement: "Primitive Technology: Wood Ash Cement" by "Primitive Technology" on KZfaq. Video ID code: *DP0t2MmOMEA* And here are two videos for mixing soil and cement, to make highways: "Paving with Soil Cement (1962)" and "Soil Stabilization with Cement (1959)". KZfaq codes are: *DkbMGm44xYc* , *5ATbLDLtwCs* . The process is similar to that for rammed earth, which is a soil-cement mixture which is compacted using a flat weight on a handle. The google-able term is "manual concrete compactor".

​@Steve Warlee First of all, checking back the comments, to see if I missed something, your comment saying "I suppose they had a flyash plant" didn't get into my noitifications. Secondly, although flyash a kind of cement, most biomass ash can be turned into a kind of cement, from my knowledge, not just the flyash component, if properly separated.

Oh stop it ... been laughing for weeks..

Add 5. who did tell egypt about this method before they even thought about pyramids.

@@maksymilianzienkiewicz1776 right I thought of that after posting. Uncanny resemblances in building stores across oceans. Matt mentioned it in passing, but didn't factor it into the analysis.

@@MarvelousOldWorld Add 6. ...and the civilisation on Easter Island?

@@frosty6960 Sounds like you have direct experience with or knowledge of the process described in the video. This concurs with my own doubts just based upon years of house building and working with various materials. Once corrosion sets in, like you say it's very difficult to control or stop the process without introducing a neutralizing agent--say baking soda on car battery terminals. Very hard to do with a 10 ton rock covering up your good work! So, I have serious doubts about this theory for this and other reasons mentioned. Cheers!

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eNmhgq90vb_ennk.html Combine physics and chemistry

EXACTLY but wouldnt it take 20 yrs maybe more to work?

@@kravmaga7070 You can estimate this. First you calculate a "pseudo-time" for the acid paste. The lab dissolution rate of granite at pH 1 is ~ 1*10^(-10) mol rock/m^2 second (and I am including a little added heat of reaction). A mol of granite is someplace around 80-100 grams. Pretend the rock surface is 1 square meter. A wet paste of AMD clay and crushed pyrite spread over the surface will dissolve (if I did the math right) 1*10^(-8) grams per second. To get any progress you need to dissolve at least a gram. So you will need 10^8 seconds which is about 3 years (pseudo-time). Coincidentally, this is about how fast scientists have said each rock could take to shape by hand alone (the larger ones). Using a "neutral wet paste", the pseudo-time is 30 years. So, it would speed them up about 10x. So, instead of 3 years (assuming that the estimated hand tooling time and "neutral paste" time are the same), it would take 0.3 years - or about 4 months for a larger stone. Some other interesting things. Molten gold looks like any other molten metal. But pyrite slurry looks like liquid gold. Dry crushed pyrite can be mistaken for bitumen in small amounts - it's black and smells like sulfur if it is fresh. Of course, its very heavy though. This process would be rather dangerous and the paste would have to be removed from the rock when finished. Without great skill - folks would get hurt. It would leave hematite (red) and black pyrite behind as a residue (Fe and S). It could also cause some toxic waste problems. The proof is in doing it - but there is some merit to this theory - unlike most of the others I have heard. Thing is, getting AMD clay is kinda hard. You can make it, but I'm not gonna be that guy.

Steve J. He looks a little old to be doing any stone masonry work but I can tell you. How they did it. Just like the pharaohs in Egypt’s pyramids slave labor in fear for their lives can do astonishing things

@@Justthemow The Egyptians didn't use slave labour to build the pyramids.

boris johnson I don’t even know what to say to this seriously you must just be a complete moron.

I like your can-do attitude👍

All those questions are valid... but consider that if the above process is valid, the site wouldn't be inhabited while under construction. the historical account confirms a very large workforce working on this full time. I wish it included which construction site he observed this process was in use at and if that site was ever actually completed or inhabited. I'm also wondering if the historical account wasn't from observing Inca doing this to the walls of pre-Inca construction out of maintenance of the existing pre-Inca construction. because the smooth scorched fronts and smooth fit lines on only the exposed surface of the wall could indicate an example of decades or hundreds of years of acid washing the pre-Inca walls for aesthetic, sanitation, remove or prevent organic material like plants from building up on the walls, beautification (?) perhaps the acid wash also provided a temporary look/effect/appearance that the Inca liked(?)... etc I don't know but it's an extension to the described process up above. I'm going to see if I can make it through the paper itself and find out how much research was performed and confirmed with real-world testing... to the author and Anci-Arch credit, the investigation and research isn't complete on this but this paper provides a valid amount of in-depth theory, testing, and progress to justify that something be published about their findings up to this point. it will or has instigated or inspired more people to look into it further, but at where they are now instead of from scratch like it would have been without its publication.

Its at least doing better than "stone pounders". A little.

I was thinking same

Once the acid has become dilute enough by the process its acidity weakens and the chemical reaction stops.

There are a lot of comments on here about acids and melting, acids that erode silica substances are not necessarily immediately corrosive to human skin. And, molten rock is a different process to acid erosion.

easy kzfaq.info3YKT2AeevWs?feature=share

@@placebogazebo9671 All it takes is gravity and time

Bookmarked

The valley was flooded they hooked it right to a floating barge

​@@placebogazebo9671 Good examples are shown if you watch films about the unfinished obelisks in egypt.

Good luck with that! Guess it did not work as you have not posted a follow-up?

Gabions mate. Put crap rubble in the middle - hardcore and rubble and the nice stuff on the outside. Works a treat.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ndOZdbxq39OnYGw.html

Sign me up as a subscriber, I'd like a wall myself - though I'll probably scale it down.

"Inca said" what the hell does that mean?

i believe it

@@charliedilltarde9881 Yes it is strange the Inca say they didnt build it....most people/civilizations who come across or take over an area will try to claim their accomplishments as theirs yet they dont.

You are totally right! Incas came after, you can observe in Machu picchu, the new inca construction with smaller stones is on top of the old one

Where inca says that?

There is no record of these huge stones being moved. Just the abandoned quarries where the material came from. The materials were not moved in large blocks, it was moved by carts in pebble/powder/aggregate sized pieces. Even wiith today's technology we don't build dams with hunks of rocks. Instead we use small sized aggregates mixed together called concrete. These people knew how to make a homogeneous mix of quarried material and built these structures with that. I do respect your respect of how hard they must have worked to make all this happen.

@@K3Flyguy How do you know this?

@@K3Flyguy your explanation implies that you know how these were constructed but, let's be honest - nobody really knows for sure how these were constructed, if they did, this technology would be in use all over the modern world. I've read explanations similar to yours that also describe how the ancient builders may have had some kind of stone-melting technology, levitation technology as well as sound frequency technology to help shape and move the stones, but quite honestly, you, me, and archaeologists don't have the answers yet. Thanks for your comment

@@K3Flyguy fails to explain why they mainly only finished the front.

@@bipolarjay why do you have to write size and weight in all caps? It makes you seem less intelligent and too emotional. No offense meant but it will make people who read your comment look at it negatively, and reply thus.

Without cranes that can lift more than 1200 tons.

only if you volunteer to be a labourer

I wonder if there is a demonstration of this theory being planned?

True dat.. It seems these were an awesome constructions like art work done by the ancient giants aka Nephilim..

aliens

@@hih-meh1344 there's no Giants according to the Bible measurements Goliath was only about 10 to 12 ft tall if that he'll the average man back then was only five foot six and we have basketball players that are 8 feet and world record holder 8 feet 11

It's ALL Geo-polymer.....it has to be. Can you imagine cutting each one of those megalithic boulders/bricks, to fit EVERY conceivable angle perfectly to fit together. Never would happen, the mason would have killed himself before he finished 10 blocks, becaus eit would have taken him 1,000 tries to get 10 as perfect as these were made. Forms had to of been used, the geo-polymer was mixed, a thin dissolvable material along with (now this acid mud) was placed between adjoining boulders, the polymer was poured, the forms were removed when it was still malleable, to round the edges and texture the surface. Now you're not moving impossible loads, but sacks of pulverized material and mixing on sight. It's how the great pyramid was built as well. I don't care if they tested the megalithic boulders and confirmed it's solid rock....they're wrong & need better equipment or they're LYING and we're ALL just dealing with ANOTHER Pseudo-Science Fraud that been passed down like one of Man's Religions. You have to think about these topics in a way that asks the question, "How would YOU Replicate what was built here?" and then you figure it out, if tasked...what would be your steps. What tools would you use today and then you'll find the answer. The Inca's didn't build the Megalithic portion or precision cut stones or precision drilled holes at these sites....That was done by the Ancient Megalithic Builders that employed the Polygonal Geo-polymer masonry engineering ALL over the World...On just about every continent you can find their work, from Easter Island to New Zealand to Japan and the list goes on. Since Mainstream Academia (Archaeology) refuses to connect the dots on Polygonal construction throughout the World, it simply translates as EVIDENCE as to their blatant disregard for TRUTH/Science & is PROOF of their Corruption or at the very least, limited intelligence. They're all pretty smart, so I'm going to vote for CORRUPTION...Indoctrination can also be an excuse, BUT this dumb Pollack armchair Warrior can figure it out, so should EVERYONE else. This is just more Pseudo-Science that has infested every sector of our Modern day Society of Dogmas'....Archaeology/Megaliths/Origin of Species all fit nicely with all the others....i.e.. *MAINSTREAM EMF Science is Pseudo-Science i.e. Industry PAID Agenda Junk Science, no different than VACCINE Pseudo-Science & Tobacco Science & Asbestos Science & Glyphosate/Round-Up Science & Cannabis Science & Bovine Growth Hormone Science & 2,4-d Science & Mercury Amalgam Science & GMO Science & Anthropogenic Climate Change Science & Lead Gas Science & Artificial Sweeteners Science & Pregnant Women-Fetus X-Ray Science & Downwinders Science & Nagasaki/Hiroshima Radiation Science & Fukushima Radiation Navy Sailors Science & Gulf War Syndrome Science & Depleted Uranium Science & DDT Science & Agent Orange Science & Geo-engineering Science & Cholesterol Science & Bio-SOLIDS Science & Autism Science* & I can go on & on & On , folks! *These are ALL Non-Replicable Agenda BIASED Science that VIOLATE the SCIENTIFIC METHOD = CORRUPTION/FRAUDULENT....FACT!!!* Hence, It's US against Them (the Remorseless Psychopaths, Fraudulent Scientists & *SKEPTIC Paid SHILLS* ) Either, you're with the PEOPLE or the Psychopaths in Washington (& their buddies; DOJ, Saddam, VICP, Osama, Noriega, the Shah, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission, Saudi's, Likud Coalition, Stalin, Israeli Govt., Hitler, etc.). It's real simple Folks.. P.S. If you ever get pregnant or you have CHILDREN, especially a daughter, do not carry your cell phone on you OR work/sleep next to Wifi's/Smart Meters/EMF's, etc.. This is from the Yale University Medical *(don't listen to me)* , here's some honest ethical PHD's/MD's that are actually trying to improve the Health & Well being of the People. Developing fetuses are at EXTREME RISK, then Little Girls, because they are born with a *finite number of eggs, once those eggs are damaged it's PERMANENT.* Men can regenerate sperm, which is a positive for us, but CHILDREN in general have thinner skulls & more water in their brains, so the EMF's penetrate & persist worse. *Lab experiments with Rats & Mice, exposed to normal EMF's experience Fertility issues. By the 3rd Generation 40% were STERILE and by the 5th Generation ALL were STERILE. Our cells are no different than theirs.....(Mammals)* EVERYBODY BETTER WAKE UP or it WILL cost you TIME from your Life or worse, a Loved One & your Genealogy!! www.babysafeproject.org/ www.bioinitiative.org/conclusions/ (EMF's cause DNA Damage, even the mitochondrial DNA!) Mobile Phone Mast Effects on Common Frogs (Rana temporaria) Tadpoles: The City Turned into a Laboratory www.researchgate.net/publication/44685415_Mobile_Phone_Mast_Effects_on_Common_Frog_Rana_temporaria_Tadpoles_The_City_Turned_into_a_Laboratory In closing, if anyone has a child that has been diagnosed with Autism or you suspect your child may have some of the attributes that are associated within the spectrums known as Autism. I'd invite you to research a Kerri Rivera with AutismONE. These folks have *CURED well over 402 kids of their spectrum diagnosis and have helped literally 1,000's upon 1,000's of kids all around the World in over 70 Countries. Western Medicine has NOT CURED ONE CHILD!!* ..... in addition *states it is IMPOSSIBLE to CURE Autism?.... nor are they even INTERESTED in LEARNING from someone who is SUCCESSFUL at HELPING ALL these KIDS & YOUNG ADULTS* ....WHAT??? This is the TRUTH and the FACT of the matter!?!? This is yet another PRIME example of Western Medicine FAILING the population of the ENTIRE world....PERIOD!! There is a CURE for Autism do NOT give up hope. Peace to all caring, logical, and ethical human beings.

I think you're perfectly Correct how possibly it was done! 😊❤ However the same technique may Not apply to bricks and stones in the WALL!!!!😮😮😮😢😢😢😅😅😅😊❤

you're still too kind

I couldn't watch past four minutes

Agree... If this is a 1 man channel, then i would understand that this guy probably dont want to pay people to narrate his videos... Computer/TTS voices are usually not a better alternative - but there are at least a few REALLY good ones... If he already writes down the narration to these videos, then it would actually require LESS work...

He's got a medical condition and so splices short clips of his own commentary. He's unable to do long continuous speech. He explained it in comments some time ago.

Yeah, let's strangle the messenger before he educates us!

I agree with Joseph completely. I liked the previous video postulating the use of some sort of cement bags though as a geologist I doubted its validity. But I love it when folks are brave enough to think outside the box. And here you show the essential trait of a good scientist, being willing to modify or discard an hypothesis in light of new evidence. Thank you for sharing your research and insights!

Welcome to the club!

Joseph Reidhead - agreed, wholeheartedly! I love binge watching this channel 😊

"scientific papers"

What scientific papers? Show me one single experiment used to gather data and compare variables underneath any of this. Show me the method statement of the carbon dating, and the sample size used for cross reference.

Interesting, if only we could see it tested

THE INCA THEMSELVES TOLD ALL THEY DID NOT I REPEAT (DID NOT) BUILD THESE everything other than this is a lie (FACT)

@@aununally4274 - I won't argue your point, but will simply add; well someone built them. In this video it was a question of "HOW," not "WHO."

@@aununally4274 Machu Pichu was definitely an Inca construction from a to z

@@aununally4274 I have read several of the Chronicles, some of them in the original medieval Spanish. The Inca never said any such thing. They said that they didn't build Piq'illacta (which the Huari built) or Puma Punq'u (which the Tiahuanacu built), but they told the Spanish which Inca built which megalithic site. Ollantaytambo and Quito were still under construction when the Spanish barbarians arrived, for the gods' sake! I don't know where that lie originated, but it's utter bullshit.

The moving part is at least imaginable, the fit-up is astounding.

A few ideas on how such rocks could be moved with reasonable man power: 1) "walk them" like legend suggested the large statues on Easter Island were moved, a method that has been demonstrated with only a couple dozen people and no extreme effort. 2) cut blocks all with a similar square cross-section (random length ok) and roll them on a wooden saw-tooth 'road' specifically designed for a given square size, if it's too much to build a miles long road of that sorts then they could roll say 10 or 20 at a time, pause to pick up the wood section behind and place in front and do it again. Heavy square blocks can be rolled quite easily if the saw tooth pattern is correct. 3) have you ever seen several men struggle with a heavy refirgerator and then see ONE man easily 'walk it' by tilting up on one edge and rocking-stepping it forward? 4) quarry them cylindrical enough to roll them on a hard packed surface and square them on site.

@@Mrbfgray Thanks, Bo. I also have read about one idea that, at least in Egypt, has worked. Use Archimedes' principle. That is, dig a canal, and make floaters around the blocks. In water such blocks are lighter due to their buoyancy, and the floaters could increase that so much, that they float. You could also use buoyancy to put them in place. That is, I think, how the pyramids were built. This method presupposes the availability of lots of water. That in itself shows that the pyramids were build at a time when there was a lot of water in Egypt. And that makes the pyramids much, much older than claimed by the archaeologists. I think that in the past the earth was tilted, and had a different equator. This is important, because the huge structures we see are aligned. They were probably all built within and before the last ice-age. Only around the equator there would be no ice, and plenty of water. That is why we see all of those anciend huge structures aligned along the old equator. It does not necessarily require a huge impact of a comet or something else for the axis of the earth to tilt in a different direction, because with so many planets around the movement of the earth around its axis is chaotic. So, from time to time the axis of the earth shifts all by its own. The moon in particular keeps this from happening very often. But it DOES sometimes, and very rarely happen. It follows from the laws of physics directly, as we know them now. In fact, there is one story in the Bible that corroborates this. It says something like that the stars and the sun stood still for 3 days.

They aren't molten, stone hammers leave behind physical marks that can be easily identifiable, that's why scholars are sure, unlike this ignorant. Is also the reason we can differentiate between pre- and post-conquest Inca-stile ashlar work, you see in instances ashlar architecture continued to be employed during the very very early colony of the central Andes region (the territory of the Inca Empire) but with the only difference they used hard metal tools (such as steel or iron) leaving behind very distinctive marks on the ashlar work, such is case in some walls of Chinchero, from afar indistinguishable but upon closer examination both pre- and post-conquest workers leave behind distinctive marks on their work.

@@konradswart4069 NO WAY the stars stood still for 3 days, that's ridiculous, how do you stop earths rotation and restart it without astronomical impacts, like getting hit by mars twice in exactly the opposite fashion, such a hit would completely destroy the planet. The Bible is full of shit. You are falling for some silly nonsense here but that's the worst of it.

😂🤣🤣

@Keir Mardy If your time were so valuable, you wouldn't spend it on YT, much less watching videos like this one. 🤣 The fact that you spent 20 minutes of your time watching this video is on you, not on the author.

@@Goreuncle I give every theory a chance until I've scrutinized and decided for myself if its valid because most people (I'm guessing you included) are sofa squatting TV watching headline consumers. Its called research dumb*ss. Its called research dumbass.

Yeah, no shit

i think thats one reason people with college degrees tend to get employed easily. the employer is like wow if you can get a degree in this boring shit then working here will be easy and fun for you lol.

🤣

Also everyone: "qUiTe TaLkInG LiKe tHAt!..."

That got voted out with the grand wizard in chief

@@garyvalencia4379 Biden eulogized a former grand wizard. Calling him a friend and mentor.

Evidence means more than a paper in applicated science. To prove any hypothesis you need to recreate the exact output. And then you have another problema to solve: transportation and walls built in mirror fashion(one opposite to the other).

@Bronski Turboski as a Man of science I can say without a doubt: I dont know. But I do know that any theory must and need to be empirically proved. And beyond any atomization. In this case it needs to fit un the global context.

You are spot on! There is always going to be evidence of the process, whether its tailings from a mechanical process, or chemical residue.

I think that the stone blocks would have been to big to be moved by man power. To day we would need a crane and wire slings with SWl 3o tons or more,The builders did not have steel wire slings.😢😢

a more plausible and realistic theory is - aliens came from outer space and used lasers to cut the stones, and used flying saucers to transport the stones, in return for apples and oranges.

these days i laugh at the mainstream version of how these are constructed for the exact same reason. Until i see someone complete even a small structure that fits as well as these and egyptian blocks i will keep my mind open to all possible methods.

@@N3onDr1v3 what other possible methods are there that are not mainstream theories?

Thanks for that bit of info

There are NO construction debris fields near the pyramids.

British scientists have discovered that the phrase "british scientists have discovered" was discovered by british scientists. They've sold more stories about the past than anyone else.

No. Science proves nothing. What science does is investigate, theorise and propose how things might work. That theory then holds until or unless someone can disprove it. What I have seen here is an excellent theory. It makes sense. If someone doesn't believe it disprove it, find evidence to the contrary.

Modern mining uses this technic called pastefill. There are also demonstrations done and called geopolymer concrete.

@@PanglossDr You forgot to mention that once one proposes a hypothesis, the majority of the scientific community must actually AGREE & SUPPORT their hypothesis in order for it to become a legitimate theory. That’s what all of the peer-reviewed journals are for, & the importance of “being published” in one (because before publication, one’s research manuscript must be ACCEPTED by a journal, which can itself be the end for some). Many have hypothesized & proposed how something might work, only to be disagreed with, unsupported, or occasionally defamed by the scientific community. Sometimes that simply means they must refine their manuscript, other times they must continue their research & include more compelling evidence before reapplying, & then sometimes it ruins their credibility or their entire career if it ruffles too many feathers, disproves a popular theory that’s become entrenched, or poses a threat to certain entities (no one wants to jeopardize their precious grants, after all. 🤭).

@@RuinedTemple Rubbish. The Scientific community is huge and very segmented. The idea that a majority should support something is ridiculous. Peer review is no longer meaningful in most areas of science. If a paper does not conform to the current orthodoxy it is impossible to get anything published. Climate Change is probably the best example of this.

@@PanglossDr This is a hypothesis, not a theory. And as with any hypothesis, it is not up to others to "disprove" it, it is up to the person making the claim to prove it.

Rubbing stones together weighing a ton is another problem entirely.

Ribbitgoesthedog Lastnamehereyeah no, that would not in any way register as a problem in this process compared to the bigger problem of stacking the stones, the even bigger problem of shaping the stones, and the probably even bigger problems of quarrying and transporting the stones. once they're stacked in place, you could rub them together by just having a few guys use long wooden poles as levers. in fact, the pillow shape with the recessed joints could help with that, because you could use the recessed crevasses to insert those wooden poles into and produce rubbing movement in various directions.

@@Ass_of_Amalek First, you can produce flat shapes easily by rubbing, but not irregular shapes. That is impossible. Secondly, using levers would produce a rocking motion, not a rubbing one. Thirdly, a rocking motion would scrape the rock unevenly, making larger gaps instead of smaller ones. Four, any friction with a rocking motion would be ineffecient, and take huge amounts of time, and the process is supposed to cut the required time, not increase it. Lastly, rubbing large rocks together would leave marks on the stone, and if such marks would exist, we would not have a mystery in the first place as it would be very obvious what kind of motion was used. Oh and one more thing. Even though wood is much softer, rocking the stone for very long times would not only wear the poles, it would leave grooves on the stone.

Ribbitgoesthedog Lastnamehereyeah of course you can produce irregular shapes by rubbing, they would just be rounded. it's not like you would be moving the stones back and forth a long way, that could never produce a tight fit even if the acid plus rubbing did work for removing a reasonable amount of material. all I'm saying is that IF acid mud was used in the assembly of the walls to fine-fit the stones together, it WOULD have been combined with rubbing, because it makes way more sense for it to work that way than for the same procedure to work without rubbing. yes, you could produce rubbing motion with lever poles, and rocking motion WOULD be rubbing motion in a different plane. defined grooves would only show if the wooden poles were always inserted in the same spots, which could easily be avoided, and if the acid really was effective, the rubbing procedure wouldn't have needed to be done all that much anyways. it's not like I'm suggesting that it was used as the primary way to fit the stones - they were no doubt shaped mechanically with stone tools before stacking to an already nearly finished fit. to me, the most plausible use for acid mud in the whole process is not in the final assembly, but to aid the mechanical shaping of the stones before assembly by weakening the stone and making it easier to remove layers of stone with stone tools, because that part of the job is a huge pain in the ass particularly with the harder stone types the used.

@@Ass_of_Amalek Round is not an irregular shape. What you are arguing here is theoretical. Yes, you could do some of what you say and it might even have good results. People could have done that with tools available. Its just, they didnt. Not in this case. We can know it by observing. And if its not used in the final assembly, it doesnt answer the original problem anymore.

Keep on doing the "put on" to folks who can bring the goods!!!