Andrew Feenberg - "Lukács’s Theory of Reification and Contemporary Social Movements"

No video

Andrew Feenberg - "Lukács’s Theory of Reification and Contemporary Social Movements"

Рет қаралды 21,742

VISR Vancouver

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 35

@samanthagibbard-mccall8065 7 жыл бұрын

I love how you can see how much he loves what he is teaching

@hmarkow1 5 жыл бұрын

Samantha Gibbard-McCall it's that smile :)

@sallystone9746 Жыл бұрын

He loves to talk about satanists.

@andrewfeenberg123 4 жыл бұрын

If would like to see more of my videos, or subscribe to my KZfaq channel, click here: kzfaq.info?_confirmation=1

@user-ep6sq6kc5p 10 ай бұрын

Lukacs is great thanks. Very good book and talk

@marcuscornelius3521 3 жыл бұрын

this guy seems so wholesome

@MartinBraonain 5 ай бұрын

That was exceptional. Thanks

@calsavestheworld 4 жыл бұрын

This is great. Thanks for this.

@andrewfeenberg123 3 жыл бұрын

To see more videos by Andrew Feenberg, subscribe at kzfaq.info?_confirmation=1

@VisibleTrouble 4 ай бұрын

Whoo. Thats enough for me… I’m suddenly feeling alienation.

@Hist_da_Musica 4 жыл бұрын

Great lecture!

@thereisonlythecave 9 жыл бұрын

Great lecture! Dr. Feenberg, why don't you write a book that provides the theoretical framework for a possible organized resistance to global capitalism? Such a book would be your most popular and important for the future. If not you, who else?

@Liamaaa 5 жыл бұрын

Hey man, check out Capital

@gloverelaxis 3 жыл бұрын

maybe have a look at Karl Marx's Capital

@thereisonlythecave 3 жыл бұрын

@@gloverelaxis I already read the 3 volumes of Capital. I meant a theoretical work that would address the present state of global capitalism. Much has taken place since Marx’s time. Capital is not the Bible, Let’s be historical.

@user-jy9mq1lx3m 2 жыл бұрын

@@thereisonlythecave Why don’t you find it by yourself? The task will not be possible without you. I mean there is no one who could substitute for you. As somesone said, who you are waiting for is very you, not Feenberg though he’s a good intellectual.

@user-ep6sq6kc5p 10 ай бұрын

Read trotskys death agony of capitalism

@ZOGGYDOGGY 8 жыл бұрын

I'd like to get fucked up with Andrew Feenberg and ask him why he can't see "bureaucrats" as wage-slaves. Just because the means of producing wealth have grown since the mid 19th century doesn't mean that the theories of Marx and Engels about how to establish communism are out of date. It can only be done by the wage-slaves themselves,, acting as a class for itself. This class would include workers who do not produce surplus value for salve with a view to profit. What's missing is what's always been missing, even when a greater percentage of the wage-slavers of the world gathered in factories to socially produce wealth--both as use-value and exchange-value. The commodity form in the age of mechanical reproduction STILL mystifies us as it did when Marx penned the critique (the fetishism of commodities) which Lukacs conceptually borrowed--reification.

@thomasmurphy9429 8 жыл бұрын

Not only have the MOP changed they've also, to use a financial term, diversified. From Marx's perspective nearly every American is a petit-bourgeois proletariat hybrid. Nearly every wage worker has assets, genuine stakes in the capital market. That's why Mao, despite his many many faults, was right to see the future of revolution in the Third World. I think the newest revolutionary class is the urban young white collar class with little job security and lower than typical standard of living.

@addammadd 4 ай бұрын

This confuses deft for assets. Unless you own a home outright, for example, you materially own nothing and literally own debt.

@soundsof... 3 жыл бұрын

Any way to have a transcript of this lecture ?

@wesleygryziak1690 5 жыл бұрын

I'd like really like to talk to this Feenberg guy and tell him a thing or two about the similar role of cosmology and contemporary share

@stephenhogg6154 5 жыл бұрын

What shares a similar role in both cosmology and contemporary political theory?

@plekkchand 5 жыл бұрын

Why isn't there a material connection between the world and your rose colored glasses?

@vitico1630 5 жыл бұрын

I thiiink he meant it as the way Kant saw it, but according to Marx there is a connection, from the perspective that the rose colored glasses are shaped by the world and the world shapes the glasses as well, I just saw a talk the change in dialectics from Kant to Lukacs and is where i got it from! Peace

@alvinren2105 3 жыл бұрын

@@vitico1630 Yo can you share the link bro?