Jazakum Allahu Khairan

❤❤❤

Refutations is part of the Deen. Whether you like it or not. What’s more important than clarifying within the Deen? It’s what separates us from the Kuffar who unite upon falsehood. Go and educate yourself instead of talking nonsense.

who did the prophet (s.a.s) refute the most, believers or non believers? of course non believers and their false assumptions. today you see people who are indulged in refuting but have never refuted anything outside the ummah which was the main thing for prophet s.a.s.. you go and educate yourself, read some sira, read quran and see what is more refuted in quran and sira. stop this nonsense!

Muslims shouldn't be "confused" by these trivial matters. But I get your sentiment and agree.

@@samboy90 Refutations on youtube that drive the youth away from the deen, are part of the deen? The word "refutations" is being used loosely by you. Making silly youtube videos ATTACKING your brothers is not a "refutation" there is an adab and an etiquette for doing so, clearly something you have never even looked at. Go and educate yourself instead of spewing asinine drivel to self-fulfill your prophecy.

@@johnbolton4802 The Prophet often refuted believers and warned them and educated them. In fact pretty much most of the hadiths are like that.

Hopefully, he's not a coward, like Lex. He just had Sam the 'pseudo-intellectual' Harris on his podcast.

@@dhuss14 both are juice 🍹

@@dhuss14 its funny you say this, he’s just had Imam Omar Suleiman on his podcast recently.

@@dhuss14 he had Omar Suleiman on his podcast recently, while I do disagree with some of imam Omar Suleiman actions and his views. From the clips that I've seen of him from the podcast (still have yet to watch the entire thing) imam Omar Suleiman did great.

Ameen!

True!!!

Give me some feedback on how to improve. JazakAllahkhair.

@@HamzaTzortzisOfficial Please add visuals and large, coloured captions to retain viewership and make it easier for Andrew's audience to digest.

@@HamzaTzortzisOfficial Smile to Jannah could help you a bit.

@@HamzaTzortzisOfficial The topic was very academic - so without appealing visuals, it becomes like a university lecture for most people. 1 quick fix could be: adding slides like regular presentations for points. so people can see the text while you talk.

The most distracting thing was cuts you can cut differently without changing the screen multiple times.

He's not a mufti afaik, and he is still pursuing his PhD.

Sheikh Dr imam mufti Brother what is this 😳

Why don't you just read the book? It's fantastic! And it is already translated to Arabic.

@@dontgetmewrong4317 Yes I've read it both in english and Arabic and it's Amazing , but the videos will be useful in their own different way 😅.

It's pathetic because it's like saying; 'We don't have the correct worldview in order to understand the transcendence of consciousness'. The 'frame of reference' is just a fancy way of saying that the 'current baseless viewpoint'; which is an utter failure. The assumptions of physicalism has, and never will, be proven. It is rooted in arrogance and is part of a wider, emotional issue with all things metaphysical due to their stinking individualism (because of the associations attached like heaven, hell, God, judgement).

@@dhuss14 the theory essentially discards consciousness as a thing. It's simply an observable phenomenon in one particular frame of reference and it won't translate to other frames of references, meaning that consciousness does not exist objectively. It uses relativity to explain the "illusion" of consciousness. The world view in and of itself is therefore a consistent one. It may or may not assume physicalism but it simply discards consciousness as an illusion. Atleast that's what I got out of it.

@@abdulrehmanmohsin7893 It's hogwash. Don't get caught up in the rhetoric. Physicalism is still baseless and cannot be proven on first principles, ever. This discards their conclusion. It is mere speculation as the Quran states. They're desperately trying to fit consciousness into their worldview. Also, this idea can easily be discarded through the multitude of other proofs, that consciousness is indeed transcendental. Its not hard to think of these proofs.

Bro science can not explain the first person expérience we dont care about your théories

@@zach381 This is not my theory, its a theory recently developed by physicists. It just applies the already existing theory of relativity to the brain and consciousness. Instead of just dismissing it on face value, you will have to go through it and understand it to rebut it. The theory seems to me to have enough explanatory power without resorting to any form of dualism, a philosophical position considered to be strange and one that should not be needlessly adopted.

Its basic logic that crushes naturalism. Well done.

Just like how Dr Hamza said in this video, even you capable of mapping the whole brain, the inner subjective consciousness that being experienced by the human cannot be replicated. Which means what you simulated as "drinking hot chocolate" is not experiencing the same experience as the specific "drinking hot chocolate" by original body. Even you successfully replicated senses as simulated sensor, the different expression of meaning for the word "hot" is individual-specific, although a pattern can be established. Thus, if we observed as a third party, we can naively assumed we successfully simulated a person, yet their experience can only be replayed like a video in simulation, where the simulation itself aren't capable of experiencing the same as original body. That's why Dr Hamza put a question: How to explain the inner subjective consciousness? The problem of explaining mind through physicalism paradigm has being highlighted through Chinese Room Argument. Even a neuroscientist, Christof Koch, lose 25 year bet to David Chalmers, a philosopher, in his race to physically explained consciousness.

@@azetaburn4491 Hi, thanks for your reply. Don't know how I missed that.

W. hat has Hamza ho t sh.d​@@azetaburn4491

What has Hamza got a pH.d in ?

Why

😉😃

Better then you keyboard worrier lol

@@Earthling.7 does he have any qualifications in this area?

Can you give a better analogy that the one presented in 8:16 ? I think its very clear

Are you a lindu ?

What’s a lindu?

So the brain has evolved( improved hardware) and the mind can either be an improved or degenerated ( software) . So u choose to stay with the old software running on an improved hardware but dont like when ppl like me update our software to keep up with the improved hardware. But u are a blend of modern and past software because u are fortunate to have a modern education which has improved ur software but there is a program called tradition that is preventing u from fully updating. This is why u are an appologetic muslim

Lol he gave that analogy to explain correlation-causation fallacy, the driver and the car have a correlation but they are not the same. Therefore, if the mind and the brain are correlated, it does not follow that they are the same. In this lengthy comment of yours all this nonsense you spoke amounted to nothing. This is what free thinking does to you, maybe try to keep it bounded by logic.

@@abdulrehmanmohsin7893 If u were able to think freely u would notice i said he took the assumption that the brain and mind are seperate and if u were able to understand logic u would of understood my analogy of the autonomus vehicle. But it still have time for u to learn

@@freethinker4402 your entire comment is a strawman. You thought so freely that you started attacking claims that no one made. He made no assumption and was simply explaining what a particular logical fallacy is using an analogy. He was explaining freaking dictionary to you lol, it wasn't related to mind and brain stuff.

@@abdulrehmanmohsin7893 what is an analogy used for mr smarts

Nah hamza is more class while smile2jannah leans toward comedic content

Assalamu alaikum. Hamza doesn't have Smile2Jannah's skills and background, nor does S2J have Hamza's skills and background. Appreciate them for what they offer, not what they lack, and say alhamdulillah for their contributions, and keep your comparisons for comparison's sake to yourself. Jazakallah khair.

@@harryosbourne451 Stop twisting what I'm saying you snake. I just meant it would get more engagement not that I don't like it .

@@harryosbourne451 U evil snake I know Hamza in real life and have met him before. Don't talk rubbish with me again