This is what separates Russian rockets from American and European rockets, they have this amazing fully automatic safety system, which prevents launch if some parameters are off the chart. If you remember then maiden flights of Vulcan, Ariane and Starship heavy rockets ended up in massive fireworks.

@@user-bx8zh2xc2z vulcan maiden flight didn’t even fail, it was the transfer stage not from ULA. Talking about starship, at least they continue developing, what about N1? And Ariane 5 is basically the safest rocket to ever fly. You really chose the easiest target to take out your arguments.

​@@juriteller3688 This is the exactly the same test launch as a starship launch. But third starship exposion is "at least they continue developing" for you And delay of Angara 5 is cause for gloating. This is called hypocrisy/double standards/upholding the general line of the US party.

@@juriteller3688 N1 was Soviet rocket, Russia can't and don't want to develop it, because its from completely different era and production lines was scattered across participant countries of USSR. But we have Angara heavy lift rocket here, it's flight was postponed due to automatic safety system and it didn't blow up in the sky like some other heavy lift rockets.

Kindly remind me - why, even after 20 years of flying and development, the last launch of Delta IV Heavy was scrubbed and delayed for almost 2 weeks?

Vostochniy

Географию в школе прогуливали?

@@user-uc1bj7ri8d Да. Вы европеец? В чем ваш вопрос?

Это дальний Восток уже)