"Professing to be wise, they became fools," Romans 1:22

Exactly. Every argument presented here, I've made countless times before I even watched creationist content. I was told, as a biology major, decades ago, that creationists lie and misconstrue and ignore evidence. So, I avoided their content, as I assumed it would not benefit my arguments, at all. And yet, just last year, my autoplay put on an AIG video while I was cooking. And the EXACT arguments I made, presented exactly the same way, using the same exact facts, is what I heard coming from the video. It was then that I realized, creationists ARE *actual* scientists. Not "fringe lunatics" as college indoctrinated me to believe they were. Our schools are teaching falsehoods. Known falsehoods, and inoculating our children against a proper understanding of our world.

The reason why macro-evolution has never been observed is that it takes millions of years to happen.

Dr George Wald, in his Nobel acceptance speech said that there are only two possibilities for the origins of life, spontaneous generation or divinecreation. Spontaneous generation was disproved 100 years ago. But that leaves us with only one alternative, and as we cannot accept that on philosophical grounds, we continue to choose to believe the impossible that life arose by chance from nothing.

What makes me laugh out loud is the fact that even Darwin put it in his book that if certain criteria were not met, this theory would be wrong. And those criteria have never been met.

Most of what drives evolutionists crazy is the truth.

"A flying dog with wings" - wow - the most stupid thing I've heard.

I still believe in a book that features talking snakes donkeys eagles and bushes and lots of other absurdities tho . Go Jesus !

I am an evolutionist and this does not make me crazy. In fact I love the questions raised. This is science, a problem is raised to your ideas and you explore further.

Here is a quote from Darwin showing even he was surprised how eagerly society took his ideas and built a huge structure around unproven theory. "I was a young man with unformed ideas. I threw out queries, suggestions, wondering all the time over everything, and to my astonishment, the ideas took like wildfire. People made a religion of them."

We can’t breed flying dogs because, it would take too long, and be extremely complicated. And, the diversity with in the dog subspecies is impressive as it is. Radical differences in size, and even in skull shape, with some dogs having very long snouts and some breeds having no snout whatsoever. There are probably more anatomical differences amongst different dog breeds, than there are between humans and chimpanzees.

Nice presentation, thank you!

The fact anyone could believe nothing caused a massive explosion in the middle of nothing and ended making everything line up perfectly in the universe is crazy lol everything moves and works together too perfectly for there not to be a creator.

Perhaps the next time you create a video trying to talk about what evolutionary biologists believe, you should bring on a well-respected evolutionary biologist and add their unedited, fully contextual arguments in with your video. Then, you can explain why you believe they’re wrong. This video format doesn’t perform any meaningful debate because it’s just “I will present to you the information I want you to know, then explain why the information I presented is wrong; oh, and I won’t respond when I’m told I didn’t explain things well/give the whole story.” Im all for discourse, just proper discourse.

Naysayers: We are the part of science. Also naysayers: You can be the opposite gender.

An excellent commentary was very concise. One minor criticism of why you need to add the annoying music in the background only adds a distraction. I notice nothing like that in the ads

While I agree with the explanation given in this video, the Achilles’ heel to this theory is the fact that people promoting it say the Earth is only 6 to 10,000 years old.… if you push that as fact, nobody will listen to anything else you have to say. * also that dinosaurs and people lived at the same time… and T-Rex was a vegetarian.

The moment a person allows doubt and distrust for God to take root in their thinking, is the moment that a chain reaction of all the seeds of evil begin germinating in the mind. The ability to believe what God has made abundantly easy to see and understand leaves a person and the scales of spiritual blindness grow rapidly. Envy and ego, greed and jealousy, shame and pride take over a persons' reasoning and motivations in life. The need to prove ones thoughts and ideas and motives become insatiable. Thanks for sharing this well presented explanation we should all be well grounded in as believers.

Thanks for all of the great content you make. One minor critique: You said "very unique" in this video. Unique means "totally unlike anything else", so something can be unique (or not), but it cannot be very "totally unlike anything else".

The only way people could believe these ideas is with blind faith.....real science is thrown out the door.....

As a Catholic school child, when school was out, I would walk across the street to the public library and wait there for my mom to pick me up. In that public library, there was one of those classic "ape to man" evolutionary images. I recall thinking, 'hmm, that makes sense.' Which is sad considering I was in a Catholic school! Even sadder is the fact that I wasn't learning a biblical world view at the Catholic school. Fast forward to my teen years. My mom becomes born again, and takes me out of the Catholic school. I also become born again and have grown in my faith, mainly because of being plugged in to solid, bible based churches. "In the beginning, God CREATED..."

I like the pacing of this video. I've seen lecture videos from the Ark encounter, and the lecturers speak so incredibly fast that it is difficult to take in and absorb what's being said. This one was well paced. Good job.

In regards to potential sources of variation to choose from what about transposons, viral mutagenesis, and genetic drift?

I love to listen to people like this man, who are intellectually gifted and know so much about these things, and are fighting for the truth to be revealed. I don’t understand much of it, but I thank God that my faith is strong and ever growing so that I don’t have to have all the answers. God’s Word is all I need. HalleluYah!

Ok but, what about a Whales hip bone…or a snakes shoulder bone….or other organs/structures in the body of creatures that are now seemingly useless

The 'Emperor's New Clothes' taught me that adults were fake and purposefully ignorant....

Around the 12:20 mark he sort of nails what apologists try to hide about evolution, which is "mutations" occur, but the mutations occur on something that already exists leading to a growing branch of the evolutionary tree. This is why big cats are related to small cats or wolves related to dogs, or humans related to other primates. There is no wild production of something completely unrelated to the original gene pool. You don't go from a fish to a human on the next mutation and what determines a new species is when the mutations soon make it impossible to have offspring with the original species who had the mutation. While this mutation often requires thousands of years to directly observe it, there are things that do create new species that are observable in our lifetime. Apologists like to call this micro evolution and of course agree that this exists but claim that because we cannot observe macro evolution, it does not exist. Sort of ironic isn't it considering we cannot physically observe God yet that exists. There is no micro and macro evolution, there is just evolution. While evolution does dispel the Adam and Eve story, it doesn't rule out the existence of Deities, only that evolution could have been their solution to the formation of life in our universe. There are Christians who accept the true science of evolution while still accepting the Christian religion.

I saw a video the other day where this guy was selling snake oil

I encourage everyone to watch the AIG playlist named "The new history of the human race."

13:37 "Its like saying that scrambling information in a computer programme could result in better software being written by random process". I am going to assume here you have never heard of "Evolved Circuits". This is process by which random 'mutations' of information and artificial selection produces an electronic circuit design to perform a particular job. There is a whole field of study delving into Evolutionary Electronics. This is doing EXACTLY what you deride as clearly ridiculous. 🤷‍♂ Just going to add the point that this evolution of a circuit starts with zero information, and by random mutation and selection, CREATES information. A process which according to you and fellow creationists is clearly impossible.

I remember reading this story when I was a kid. And always keeping the moral of that story throughout my life when encountering similar situations

Hey, AiG. Let me give you some free advice, so that the general population will take you more seriously. Stop using these terms: 1. “Evolutionist” 2. “Darwin/Darwinian/Darwinism 3. “Secular Science” People who aren’t creationists, don’t refer to themselves as “evolutionists”. That’s like calling myself a “round-earther”. You keep referring to Darwin, as if he holds a god-like status. Darwin is 200 years ago. He got some things right, he got some things wrong. Let’s try to catch up on what has been discovered since then, okay? Science holds no belief system, so referring it as “secular”, sounds as ridiculous as it is. “Science” helps you make this show possible: the electricity, the lights, the cameras, the internet, KZfaq, etc. All done by science, not secular science, or “Christian/biblical Science” (whatever that is?) Hope this helps.

This video said nothing and was an extreme waist of time, this dudes false logic was totally filling in his own belief which is satanic

The deck of cards analogy is very helpful because it illustrates a key difference between both camps. AiG proposes that cards from the same deck are shared and mixed together, while evolutionists claim that each generation (or, rather, each member of that generation) is effectively copying - and sometimes mis-copying - genetic information from the previous generation’s deck. This allows for the possibility of mutations, and also doesn’t imply that the parents’ genetic information is used us after they have two children. This ‘copying’ rather than ‘reusing’ theory also explains how the Tarot deck of cards (with different symbols) emerged through the copying of traditional playing cards.

As an atheist, it's interesting to me to watch these videos, because while they do have some truth in them, they always leave out a bit of information that's crucial to understanding why they're wrong. In this video, the missing bit is genetic mutations. This is gonna be a long comment, so the TLDR is that genetic mutation is extremely common and if it happens in exactly the right way (which is very likely given the timespans evolution deals with) you can get a 'new gene,' something that this video stressed as being impossible. Genetic mutation is actually extremely common in the form of point mutations, where one DNA pair (DNA is composed of four nucleotides - cytosine, adenine, guanine, and thymine. Adenine will bond with thymine, and cytosine will bond with guanine, and when you stack enough pairs on top of each other, you get the double helix of DNA, where one strand will be made up of all of the respective nucleotides of the other strand - for example, one strand could be ATCG, and the other strand opposite would be TAGC) is somehow messed up in the copying process. It might have been removed, replaced with another pair, or there might even be an extra imposter pair. This is important because of how DNA functions. DNA is a set of instructions to make proteins, and the proteins are made up of amino acids. There are 21 amino acids, but only 4 nucleotides, so when the instructions are being read in the ribosome, it reads 3 nucleotides at a time, and each combination of 3 nucleotides is going to correspond to an amino acid. There are 4 possible nucleotides though, and if you put them in a combination of 3, that's 4^3 possibilities, which is 64 - more than the 21 nucleotides. This means that there are repetitions - AAA and AAG both make lysine, for example. This is a sort of padding, so that some point mutations, such as replacing an A with a G, or vice versa, have no effect on protein production. However, AAC is asparagine, and this would mean that that one section of DNA is gonna make a different protein. What about addition or deletion of pairs, however? Well, that's gonna be even worse - that would shift the ENTIRE DNA strand over one, so if you had a strand that before was AACAAA, which would make asparagine + lysine, and you added a G at the start, you'd be making glutamate + glutamine, and whatever pairs came afterwards would also be shifted by that extra adenine at the end. Sorry if this was all way too complicated, but the idea is that if you have these genetic mutations happening, and you give enough time for them to keep happening, you could in fact get a reptile with wings. This is also pretty obvious just by looking at the fact that some animals that are parts of the same group have genes that the other animals don't, but at the same time they share a ton of other genes which make it obvious that they're part of the same group - flying fish and sharks, for example, couldn't be more different, but they're both fish.

Wow - what a simplified version of science to fit a belief. He makes the argument that man bred dogs for 300 years and none of them have feathers so therefor, evolution which occurred over millions or billions of years isn’t valid scientific argument. He does throw in mutations but equates mutations to always being inferior. Granted 99 out of 100 (or maybe 999 out of 1000) mutations may cause weakness or death to the animal, the 1% or 0.1% that have a favorable mutation, would have a significant advantage over the rest of the species. As these animals breed and additional mutations occur over thousands of years, the animals can develop into a very different looking and functioning creature. So using flawed logic and simplified science he is simply saying “you cannot prove 100% that evolution is real and therefore the belief in a supernatural being is more believable” is not something that provides any sway to my understanding. This is a good argument for those that have already decided in a supernatural being to explain everything that doesn’t have a simple answer. It will further enforce the belief in those that refuse to do the hard work of thinking. There are clearly scientists that do not believe in evolution from a single cell to the complex life we see today and they have their theories which are well thought out and arguable. But universally it is acknowledged that life has been changing for over a billion years. The argument above does not address what can happen in a billion years and watching this gives me the feeling of a semi-knowledgeable adult talking to a classroom of second graders.

So how do you explain ERVs confirming the relationships between vastly different species? And can someone explain what a "kind" is?

Forrest Valkai absolutely destroyed this bonkers video.

I have become a great fan of your content. I watched just 3 of your contents and I cannot stop watching.. The card demo was perfect to reshape the concept of Natural Selection. Yes Genetic Mutation can happen from what is already available in the Gene pool of the higher peers of a species. Thanks again.

So you admit the mechanisms of evolution are real, the observations of evolution are real, that speciation has been observed, that evolution has been observed, but them cover your eyes and put your fingers in your ears and claim evolution isn't real? This is sad.

Wow. This guy didn't skip a beat when speaking. Well done! I actually could follow along with understanding and focus. This was great! All Glory to God!

This is a great video, it's got it all, rocks to humans, kinds, conflating abiogenesis and evolution, evolution having never been observed, macro and micro evolution etc, the full creationist lack of understanding of even high school level biology. God is great but ditch the idea that creationism explains the diversity of life on earth because it doesn't.

A closed mind is a shallow device to preserve ignorance....

It's so easy to see, unless you're blind. Very sad. May God continue to bless and guide the Answers in Genesis mission.

Thank you for this clear cut easy to digest take on micro/macro evolution fib that’s being forced on us. God bless you and all you do.

How to pick an inappropriate analogy... People are being proposed to see something that they are told is there, present and obvious, when in fact, it is not, only to the proposers! Empirical evidence of and for evolution is there, present and obvious. Just as we exist in the corporeal world, we do so by no choice, we don't exist in some metaphysical world of your choosing.

I appreciate the distinction between natural selection. You made statements regarding spontaneous mutation that were incorrect. While most mutations are indeed deleterious and result and subtracting from the gene pool if given enough time if one in 1 million mutations are beneficial and expose an organism to natural selection the effect of spontaneous mutations will be seen.

The deck of cards analogy is totally wrong. New genes can arise by well understood mechanisms

14.58 mins of sicense misrepresented followed by only 33 second to explain why the Bible's explanation makes perfect senses. I'm sorry I'm not convinced. Where is the observed evidence or demostrable experiment to prove god exists and that she made the world in only 7 days?

Forgetting that mutations add new cards lol 😂

I agree: "god did it" is definitely more intellectually honest and has greater explanatory powers.

What baffles me the most… people can’t (don’t wish to) wrap their minds around this. It’s so simple. It’s far logical than the alternative.

This was well produced, liked it very much ! I’ll use it .

Exactly genetic entropy is what we are witnessing. Not the addition of new genetic information that creates novel functionality and structures. Every time I bring this up people try to fall back knto ad populum and "multiple fields" which correspond supposedly to corroborate the theory when in reality geomagnetism, astronomy, genetics and virology completely disagree with this notion. It's just that only a few people are actually looking past the indoctrination and asking the questions to get to the heart of the matter. And of course those individuals are treated as outcasts and liars. Such is the world we live in today.

Darwin also knew nothing of how complex cells were and how complicated these changes were.

I only find it crazy that people deny it or somehow think it disproves God.

It's kind of amusing to hear someone say that believing in the process of evolution is "believing in something that no one has seen, and then in the next breath refer to a god, which is the ultimate "believing in something that no one has seen". LOL

10:54 it ends up making more because of genetic mutations in organisms. Genetic mutations create random changes in an organism that are are either beneficial or harmful to the organism. Mutations are then selected through natural selection. Speciation is the result of two organisms can no longer produce fertile offspring. This could be the result of many factors including changes in behavioural patterns or geographic changes. The phrase “everyone is unique” is an excellent example of mutations. I have longer arms than most people, some people are born with an extra chromosome, some people are extremely tall. The list goes on. If we selected for these mutations, let’s say we let only people with certain mutations exist like for example, some people can see a broader spectrum of light. Over many years this mutation will become a dominant gene until another useful mutation is selected in which the cycle will continue. Really enjoyed the video and have learned more about other perspectives and how even if I disagree, can still learn something.

I find it curious that he mentioned mutations and forgot to mention positive or even neutral gene mutations. Not every mutation results in something bad happening, if that were the case, then there would theoretically be a "perfect" genome somewhere out there, zero flaws, but that would have been at the beginning of gene based life. Take for instance, the ability for humans to drink milk from non humans, its not a normal trait, it was a random mutation that came along. Doesn't seem very negative to me, it seemed to actually help as it expanded the sources of calcium and other minerals humanity can gain access to. Gotta love people claiming to have questions that drive 'X Community' crazy, then proceeding to ignore the information that doesn't prove their point. It's not the deck of cards that dictates the traits of an organism, its the combinations in which they are played in the game we call life. Take a look at a chart that has the combinations of amino acids in DNA, some of them give different results, some have multiple trios that give the same result. This results in some mutations being positive, some neutral with no effect and some negative. Thanks for coming to my TEDTalk

Well worth watching. I really enjoy this guy. He speaks with such clarity and humility, rather than contempt. And that's not easy, considering there is SO much ridiculous material spewing out from evolutionists.

What a great, fresh, out of the box explanation of "natural selection." I could never understand the topic as it relates to evolution. But your picture of only being able to 'select' what's available in the buffet . . . perfect. The 'gene pool.' Such a fresh approach. Thank you. Great!

Microevolution equals macroevolution, accepting one will inevitably lead to the other, evolution doesn't stop at some time it goes on forever as long as the creature's lineage exists, it is a process that lasts millions of years because each major mutation is small and almost non visible, we only see those changes when the species already separated completely, it is similar as to how we don't see the changes in our body from when we are a baby to when we are an adult, you can take photos but there will not be a "transitional" photo that is gonna make it clear when you stopped being a baby or a kid, that's what happens to the transitional fossils that we have, they are so similar to us genetically and physically that when you make a line with all of them chronologically located it all leads to a clear pattern of evolution over the millions of years that they existed to the bones of us living today, I would be happy to see you guys trying to debate with someone with at least basic knowledge of evolutionary biology because I'm certain that those arguments wouldn't last a minute.

Calvin! Was wondering what happened to you after Creation Magazine Live.

This is an extremely poor argument against evolution. The time frames and concepts he's covering are extremely simplified and easily explained by evolutionists. Check out guys like ProfessorDaveExplains if you're interested in hearing what the other side has to say. The science is quite convincing, in my view, and I'm still a Christian.

Delusion at its finest.

Is the domestic dog a different “kind” of animal from the wolf? It seems to be a different species from the wolf, because (among other things) dogs relate to humans in a way that wolves do not, even if raised from birth by humans. But the DNA of dog and wolf are so similar that they are sometimes considered subspecies, or varieties of the same species. The theory is that the dog is derived from a now-extinct wolf species in the Pleistocene era (see “Dog” in Wikipedia for a summary of the theory), probably when wolves began to hang around human encampments, looking for discarded meat and bones and other edible waste. Humans then found them useful as an “alarm system” (like watchdogs) and later as helpers on the hunt (pointing out game, like hunting dogs). If the dog is a different “kind” of animal from the wolf, then this is a case of a new “kind” arising in a very short period of time (about 15,000 years) by human selection (rather than natural selection). If the dog is the same “kind” of animal as the wolf, this still suggests that separation of two varieties of the same “kind” over a much longer time frame (millions of years instead of thousands of years) might, in fact, produce a new “kind.”

Looks like you completely forgot about mutations. Mutations add new stuff into the gene-pool that was never there before, meaning that your "deck of cards" explanation is invalid.

"If a woman kiss a frog and it turn into a prince we call it a fairy tale... but if a frog turn into a man over million of years we call it science..."

So how do you explain people born with 6 fingers or 2 heads then? It's genetic mutation.

Somehow, I still have trouble seeing a chihuahua as a dog🤔

I almost forgot he was Canadian, then he said, "...brought a Boat...." at 13:21 lol

Thank you so much keep the good news coming

A great Maxim is this “DO NOT learn all you know about evolution from Creationists!” However, as the video demonstrates, you CAN learn something about evolution from Creationists but there’s a catch! If you only listen to Creationists, how can you separate: The correct from the incorrect, The wheat from the chaff, and The truth from the lies and fill in the missing perceptions? It's not easy unless you can see some light. This might help. 1) Note that no mention is made of the possibility that "Beneficial Mutations" can sometimes if rarely, occur and be Naturally Selected. That adds NEW information to the gene pool. 2) Note that no mention is made of "Gene Duplication". This is a significant mechanism via which beneficial mutations can be retained without loss of the original function. That's ADDITION not SUBTRACTION. 3) Remember that the scientific model of reality includes plenty of evidence that the Earth is some 5,000,000,000 years old and not 6,000. No surprise therefore that some very slow evolutionary mechanisms have not been observed in the last 1000 years. 4) Note that whales have vestigial hind legs indicating evolution from land animals. 5) Remember that vaccination works via the natural selection of random mutations to DNA. Consequently, a vaccinated Creationist who denies the possibility of beneficial mutations is a walking contradiction. 6) Remember that the analysis of tell-tale genetic markers in DNA has led to the conclusion that Chimps are our closest relatives and our common ancestor species lived some 6,000,000 years ago. 7) Creationist commentators know all this. Ask yourself why they never mention it.

I love this video, and I am an evolutionist. I do enjoy the separation of natural selection from evolution, but I do not agree with your disapproval of evolution. You seem to hold the idea that genetic mutation only takes away from a genetic pool, but that is simply not the case. I saw someone else in the comment section mention allergies, which is your body looking for dangerous substances, and deeming certain things as harmful, which while they are not helpful, they certainly are not taking away an antibody or a digestive element, but adding an antibody against that source. Genetic mutation can happen on a large scale as well. Blocks of DNA are composed of three sections of nucleotides, which is what is composed in chromosomes. If one of those nucleotides are removed and the rest of the DNA strand is forced to move up, that entire strand of DNA is permanently changed, and when a strand of RNA comes to copy it, it creates more and more. I understand that evolution seems sceptical and even odd, but it is simply wrong to assume that genetic mutation cannot be beneficial, and it is wrong to assume that genetic material cannot be constructed incorrectly. Simple changes such as a changed nucleotide could cause a cell to produce more keratin than normal, and that keratin may be pushed outside of our cells and form odd plates, or there may be a mistake that causes us to develop a protein in our body that does absolutely nothing, which happens quite often. Random mutations take a large amount of time, but they do happen. I will say my evidence for this will be allergies, and if you can prove that another phenomena caused them, I will provide more research and more study into the subject, and I will gladly debate with you, or if you wanted to take a jab at my own argument, please do so. I enjoy the way you debate, so please, debate me.

Even if one could see a micro-evolutionary mutation that created a single small change, there would still be a huge problem: Every micro change can only continue to exist if, for its own sake, it somehow supports or enhances viability and procreation. Not merely the major outcome (say a liver e.g.) but every preceding micro mutation must have such a fundamental ground. Evolution is ostensibly a series of endpoints not "steps." Even the very term "steps" suggests purpose.

Well explained. Thank you and God bless.

Many things can be simultaneously true and not mutually exclusive. (Natural selection can be true, aNd God's Creation is true too) There can be many truths in Lies... ...There are no lies in Truth.

I really struggle with this. I'm a Christian but I find myself not believing the creation account in Genesis. To me, it is allegorical.

***the fact is that, you are crazy but do not like to be alone; take care of yourself and leave the sane ones in peace.***

Wow. Simple and hard hitting delivery.

The problem I see with this, is while very reasonable, the arguments fail to factor in 2 Things: that new genes can emerge (super rare, but random mutation can add new gene information) and the unbelievible amount of time Evolution takes. (Sorry for my bad english)

3:33 adaptation is the change of behavioral/structural features of living things over time because of changes in its environment

Love from India. I like ray comfort tooo...

Outstanding analysis, concise, informative, easy to understand. Well done

The one thing that is apparent is we are devolving every generation.

It's amusing he says macro evolution is "a good story" but is fiction because it's unobservable. The irony of a creationist saying that something unobservable is a fiction is simply the best.

Thank you AIG for posting this and keeping the comments turned on. Information and debate is a good thing as long as we can have a civil discourse.

This video doesn't drive evolutionists crazy, they just don't care.

Been teaching this sort of thing in a public school classroom for many years. 🙂 So much fun and satisfying to discredit naturalism in a place where it is the resident religion. All I have to do is tell the truth; science is the search for truth. 🙂

I'm 48. A Genetics graduate from 1997. I said all this 30 years ago. Speciation isn't possible by natural selection. Natural selection is easy to understand. For 12,000 years humans bred animals and plants. And the illiterate farmers for generations understood intuitively "manual selection" You missed this: partial sterility (outside any geographical isolation factors) is necessarily part of speciation. And the highest amount of speciation occurs in rain forest and coral reefs where there is no geographical isolation. But speciation means partial sterility which natural selection MASSIVELY selects against . IE it doesn't matter how big your muscles, if you can't mate 100% efficiently compared to your peers

This guy is a very, very good presenter. Great pacing and genuine delivery.

Tbh this is extremely interesting. We take so many claims in the modern world as "scientific consensus", but most study nothing about the formations of the theories.

Wonderful presentation! I will use this. In trying to think of objections that might arise. How would one answer about the fish in Florida that climb out of the water and scutter across roadways to the other side of the water? One could say that is mutation or evolution seen with one's own eyes. What is the elevator statement answer to this (or a longer one)? Do you already have videos covering this?

Thank you for this!

What about DNA mutations due to things such as radiation? Effectively adding more cards to the deck? Some mutations are less advantageous, others more.

I HAVE ALWAYS THOUGHT IN TERMS OF HOW THEIR IS NO WAY TO CREATE LIFE OR CONSCIOUS THOUGHT THROUGH CHEMICAL REACTIONS OR ANYTHING REMOTELY SCIENCY BUT YOU MAKE EVEN BETTER AND CLOSER HITTING POINTS WHICH I NEVER RESEARCHED, BECAUSE I FIND THE WHOLE OF EVOLUTION TOO ABSURD

Excellent summary. Packed with information.

Great video. Thanks for sharing the truth.

Great video!

6:50 nice of them to include footage of anti-evolutionists in this video