Yes, he got nobel recently

Quantum physics is fundamentally random, proven.

Jeremy Yarbro "fundamentally random, proven" to us, or at least our current means of interrogating nature. i remind you that newton laws were looking unbreakable, but now we know that they were only depicting a narrow part of nature. that was the part that we could "see" at that time. next came the einstein revolution and things were checked out to an incredible accuracy, space turned out to be such made that the passage of time is an illusion. einstein did not believe in his free will just like he did not believe movie characters have free will, and he was clearly more logical and honest in his thinking than the rest 99,999% of us! but now, top scientists say it's time to rethink it all, like julian barbour, lee shmolin and others. even tho, i repeat, einstein's view checked out all the rigorous testing in the world, from laboratory testing with lasers, the working of the GPS system, to all cosmic observations. the last big test, which it passed(!) was a couple of months ago when gravitational waves were observed exactly like those predicted by his theory a century ago. in respect to QT it may be after all, an absolute law that nothing from the fabric of the universe, made from quantum particles up, cannot ever see the quantum manifestation other than random. BUT that doesn't mean it's random in nature.

Jeremy Yarbro furthermore top scientists believe in the many worlds interpretation of QM, which is only random to observers! clearly you cannot deny the reputation of sean carroll, steven hawking, steven weinberg. so theres plenty of reasons to wonder at zeilinger's assured stance. maybe he was referring to things only from the perspective of observers, which could be true.

+anywherein12seconds Zeiliger is a top scientist. In fact he pretty much invented quantum teleportation. Few in the world know as much about QM as he does, even other scientists.

Jeremy Yarbro the most renowned scientist in applied quantum physics, in devising various instruments and methods to test it. but we should rest assured, his understanding and perspective on this complex domain will be minuscule compared with some future scientist or Ai. he may be right in various aspects..

na ja, ich bin auch noch da !

@@johannschiestl2772 Sorry, habe Dich vergessen - und es gibt ja auch noch Joseph Hader! Anton rutscht auf Platz drei..

No

Because it sounds magical... Randomness and magic are equivalent. Its very hard for me to truly believe in absolute, infinite randomness, but I guess that in the framework of QM that has been proven. But there must be an explanation to all of that. My explanation to QM is the following: Imagine not being a human being, but being a Star, like our Sun. Or even better, imagine being an entire galaxy. So you are an entire galaxy, in fact you are the Andromeda galaxy and you can look out and observe other galaxies, like our own miklyway galaxy etc... And the laws of physics that you are going to need, if you are not just a galaxy, but a physicist too! :P Is the laws of Einstein's relativity... You can use those to predict pretty much everything that goes on around you. But one day you take a microscope, and you look at one individual part of you. You see that is comprised of individual stars, and most of them have planets on them. Still all those stars and all those planets still abide by the same laws of Einstein's relativity, so all is still good... But one day you notice that in some of those planets, there "life" on them (of course you don't know what life even is so you name them "quanta"). So those are planets that have animals on them and even people! And there is no law that govern how those animals or people will behave! To you their behavior is truly random. Sure you can create a theory that will give you the probability that one person might appear to be in one place more than in any other place, so the probability distribution... And sure the more you look at one individual persons attribute you lose information about that same person's other attributes (so Heisenberg's uncertainty principle...) and most importantly, no law that you could have come up with looking at the stars or other galaxies could ever explain those weird creatures down there. They seem to have... A mind of their own! So you ultimately say, you know, that's very spooky, I need to name that the "quantum world" and separate it from the classical world of stars and galaxies which is easily predictable. This new stuff is wild! So far, we have no known law that explains consciousness, or any law that tells us anything about free will. We simply don't know. So you can imagine how even harder it would be for our galaxy physicist here to make any remote sense of what is going on! The world that he suddenly stumbled upon is completely unknown and intuitive to him, obviously he has never seen anything alive before, so he would think that he is insane! I kind of feel that we are in the same way with QM and we stumbled upon this weird world that we have never seen before and we have no way to depict it classically because none of our classical experiences can lead us there to that strange world. Is it truly random? Is consciousness truly random? We don't know, but I don't think so. I think its not, I think that QM is just so unimaginably out of our world that we don't have any good analogies for.

@@-_Nuke_- think of randomness as a happening beyond logical human comprehension, because it does not follow any fixed predetermined pattern.