How comes stars are not seen fro m the moon ?

@@malaremurilo8046how come the stars are not seen from earth during daytime ?

@@jacqueswaahl5036 its because of the sun rays, but on the video you can see they landed on the part of the moon where these is no direct sunrays coming to them , so why stars are not seen shining from the space ?

@@malaremurilo8046??

This really is a gem. I hope I will see another moon launch in my lifetime. 24yo right now.

The mars rover missions are the most beautifull missions in my lifetime.

Wow ! 😂😂😂😂😂😂

What did you see? What we’re watching Now ? NO !

@@deangeneral7640 seems like you are very keen to get my reply..well I'm still saying...it's the best documentary i have ever seen till now.

😂

hahahaha

And the poetry! It made me nauseous... those clunky cameras attached to the spacesuit, brilliant! 🤠

@danielleblanc8302 Maybe Orion mission - back to the Moon - had to be canceled, because you could not help. And those not very well organized guys in NASA say, they lost Apollo technology. Without your help, and decade by decade worse technology I can't see how it's not to late.

@@jazemkrzysio Not. A. Space. Agency.

@@charles_preston I.D.I.O.T!!!!!

Oh yeah. The tech is only one piece of the puzzle. A necessary piece, but not sufficient to get to the moon. The social and psychological aspects are also necessary.

@@gives_bad_advice very true.

@kristoferzamojski7140Też tak miałem. W czasie Apollo 17 zostałem modelarzem lotniczym. Jakiś pomysł, kto zmienia pozycję, oraz zoom kamery w 4 i 24 minucie, gdy obaj są zajęci?

Same for me)

So..I must be that kind of weirdo..I love this docs as soundtrack along my CG endless hours of work

well......i confirm.....you are a weirdo 😂 Cheers

Fairy tales are always best to fall asleep to. The gingerbread man and Jimmy crack corn.

Whatever makes you happy. 😁

@DilipAghav I hope they do send people.

@@anonymous-hz1mf They also photographed the Apollos 11 and 12 landing sites and low and behold there are the LM lower stages. Oh we are in another space race. May not have the urgency of the 1960s one, but indeed a race. NASA and it's partners are still currently in the lead. But China, India, Japan and even Russia have eyes on the moon.

If they would ever get out of those scam centers and into the labs. Then maybe Mr Patel

@@chillindylan9828 You mean green-screen technology.

The biggest lie of the century! 😥

@@elciosampaio2018 Ok you think a lie. Why?

@@elciosampaio2018I APPRECIATE YOU ! ❤

@@elciosampaio2018 feel pity for you and all those like you :(

How the flag fluttered when there was no air in it.كيف رفرف العلم عندما لم يكن هناك هواء فيه.

@@user-rp1ql5uk3l pretty confident the flag did not have air in it. Just like flags on earth! What it did have was movement by the astronaut. An object when moved is going to move, regardless of atmosphere or not.

@@erac5855 الهبوط كذب امريكا لم تهبط على القمر هذا تصوير على الأرض. The landing is a lie. America did not land on the moon. This is a depiction on Earth

@@user-rp1ql5uk3l whatever helps you sleep at night

YOU'RE PRETTY BUT NOT BRIGHT IF YOU THINK WE SET FOOT ON THE MOON

@@leelunk8235 I still don’t know!! I definitely don’t 100% think we did.. but while watching this it was hard not to believe… 🙄😂

​@@alexandriaa44100% WE DIDNT. IMPOSSIBLE

@@lecrabesavant4435 1967 WE DIDN'T EVEN HAVE COLOR TV'S. WE CANT EVEN SEND ASTRONAUTS TO THE ISS WITHOUT THEM EXPLODING, HELL NO WE DIDN'T

Someone needs their diaper changed. We got a party pooper in the comment thread.

Huh? What makes you think it has anything to do with technology?

Ono GIA: Brave has nothing to do with it unless you mean the lack of it with politicians. This is a short history of why the Lunar Missions stopped in 1972. Also why it is taking so long to get back. Congress started cutting NASA's budget even before NASA got to the moon. 1966 was NASA's biggest budget year. They got approximately 4.6% of the U.S. G.D.P.. This is while they were still building the infrastructure for Apollo and they hoped an infrastructure to get them beyond the moon to Mars by 1981-2. After 1966 NASA's budget went on a steady decline. Originally the first phase of Lunar Exploration was to go to Apollo 20. NASA had built in the infrastructure for a continuous supply of CSMs LMs and SaturnVs. Plans were in the works for upgraded CSM, LMs and SaturnVs. NASA even built prototype pressurized LRVs for use on planned Lunar Colonies. There were plans for more then 1 Skylab as a stepping stone for larger Space Stations. Original plans for the Space Shuttle were for a much more elaborate system to ferry astronauts and equipment to and from the ever expanding Space Stations. They were even looking at plans for making the Saturn V's first and second stages recoverable and reusable. Originally Launch Complex 39 was to have 6 launch pads. Then it got cut to 3, then only 2 were built. They built 3 mobile launch towers, but only 2 were ever used. All the working plans and proposals are still there to be seen. With NASA’s budget being cut after 1966, bit by bit NASA’s ambitious plans started to dwindle. After Apollo 11 it was planned to have 4 Apollo launches a year till Apollo 20. This soon got cut to 2 per year and at the same time Apollo 20 was cancelled. In late 1970 future contracts to build more Apollo CSMs, LMs and Saturn Vs were cancelled. The remaining 5 CSM: 3 would be used for Skylab of which there would only be 1 Skylab now. One CSM was planned for the then hopeful Apollo Soyuz mission and the last CSM(now in a museum) was modified to hold 5 people as a potential rescue mission for Skylab crews. One of the remaining three SaturnVs would be used to launch Skylab, the last two are now museum pieces. NASA’s budget continued to get cut and along with it Space Shuttle kept being scaled back from what NASA wanted. In 1975 NASA started to redo Pad 39A for the coming Space Shuttle. But NASA kept begging to get Apollo going again and maintained Pad 39B for Apollo and tried to maintain as much of the Apollo infrastructure and talent as they could. But by 1977 it was clear Apollo was dead. So NASA let the Apollo infrastructure and talent atrophy away. Through the terms of Regan, Bush, Clinton, Bush and Obama, NASA was pushed and pulled in many directions with start and stop goals given and taken away. All of them with plans to return to the moon. Bush 2 laid out the most promising plan for a return to the moon in 2004 with the Constellation Program. It called for a return to the moon before 2014. In 2010 Obama cancelled Constellation after a lot of money and effort had been spent. All with budgets nothing like the had in 1966. The current Artemis plans which rose out of the ashes of Constellation are 12 years old and moving at a snails pace on a shoestring budget. Another reason it is taking so long. Go look up NASA’s plans and dreams. Would have been amazing had they been allowed to carry on. NASA was thinking exploration, human expansion and potential research science and resources to gain. The government thought, beat the USSR and not much more.

6 times with untested "tech". 50 years later... Ooops how do we do it. Laughably fake

@@BadAtTeaDude LOL you lack of any kind of research is laughable. How do you mean untested. Every piece of major equipment was tested more then once. Both uncrewed and crewed. If would would read it, I would tell you the reason for the 5 year gap, but that would be like reading. What has you convinces it was, "Laughably fake"?

@@williammann9176 😴 Untested Fake

This is a desert area and they deceived the world.

Well, no. Listen to the original recordings, and you can hear the pauses before the astronauts reply to Mission Control. This is often edited out for brevity.

Agreed. I talked to my teenage daughters about it often and am so glad they haven’t been indoctrinated into the nonsense so many do now. They watch and research the science.

Definitely an achievement! It fool the whole world.

Sky with no stars? Unbelievable!

You’re thanking them for fooling you? 🫣

​@@brightcamp4091But if Russia flew to the moon, you would definitely believe it 😂😂😂

Editing nhi hai

We will build a moon base soon to pave the way for a mars colony and i cant wait either we’re living in one of the best times for space exploration

Why not, if they could fly to the Moon with 2500 tons rocket, instead of required 800 000 tons, and equipped with onboard computer of few dozens kilobytes? And carrying lightweight cameras better than Hollywood ones - look how their cameras were able to track and zoom them, while both are busy, e.g. 4", or 24"? That was amazing technology, not like modern 21st century junk, letting barely phone zombies to drop me off my bicycle, as they don't even know, they already left their walkway!

They take a shower after exiting the studio

It was a huge problem for the astronauts, one of them had a small heart attack and never fully recovered. Combating lunar dust will have the highest priority in future lunar missions.

@@spamm0145 , ,, ,

Unfortunately no footage of them exists exiting or entering the module.

I have yet to see footage of the lander leaving the surface and back up to the orbiter. The lander may still be sitting there for all I know. I can imagine they orbited and began wondering if they could get off the surface since they'd never practiced it . And decided to put down the lander and leave it. There's so many gaps in the narrative it makes you wonder.

I can see why someone could question that. As the LM is approaching the CSM the RCS are constantly firing around the LM lining up to dock. Every firing send vibrations through the LM causing items not totally locked down to move.

😂😂😂😂❤

Is this real video of apollo 17

Well those suits certainly proved you a fool.

@@neilarmstrongsson795 "dead gummit" twice?😂😂😂

Jack is hilarious! They joked about a ballerina company calling Mission Control to offer him a spot.

The answer is at your fingertips. Just look up the dimensions of a Lunar EVA Hasselblad EL with 70mm film mag used on Apollo 17.

@@williammann9176 I didn't find the size on the Internet, tell me if you have it on hand

Me and you go 😔💖

USA never put anyone on the moon lol

Do you really believe USA send a human to the moon? Thats all blue lies no one has never been to the moon.

They’re aiming to put a LGBTQ+ BLM person on the moon.

@draco moron on marijuana spotted 😂

Great question! It’s being transmitted through the hammer, up through the glove and insulated from vacuum uniform to the microphone he’s speaking through.

There is a program called Artemis. Artemis I has already flown. It was unmanned, orbited the moon and came back. Artemis II will fly a similar mission but with astronauts on board. Artemis III plans to land men on the moon for the first time since Apollo 17 in 1972.

@@willoughbykrenzteinburg I wouldn't bet on Artemis III landing. NASA is already backtracking and saying that Artemis III might be another orbital mission. It's pretty doubtful that either of the landers will be ready on time.

@@rockethead7Hadn't heard that. Bummer.

​@@willoughbykrenzteinburg spacex moment

They've already contracted Blue to be a "2nd lander" to the SpaceX version. As far as I'm concerned, it's only a matter of time before they cancel SpaceX altogether. I was shocked from Day-1 that they even chose SpaceX and that hideous monstrosity. But, when the person on the NASA board who was leading them to select SpaceX got a high paying job at SpaceX, yeah, it made more sense about why that happened. As soon as Blue shows that they're ready to fly, my guess is that NASA will dump SpaceX. SpaceX is a joke of a rocket company, powered more by hype than rocket fuel.

Alan Shepard didn't.

@@yassassin6425 Yep, Yaasin ... Alan got a Birdie and an Eagle. Neil Armstrong may have been the FIRST MAN on the Moon, but Good Ol' Al was the FIRST to finish 8 Under Par.

Dio? Quale Dio? È l'uomo artefice. Studi Darwin e l'evoluzione della specie oppure continui pure a credere alle favole.

​@@marcominelli2578In his tales the sky is solid and the moon is nailed to the sky 😂😂😂

So what

the internet is at your fingertips. The largest repository of information humans have ever created and you choose ignorance....

Sorry, but an emoji isn't evidence.

🙄

You meant they also faked their excitement? 🤔 and every jump they made? 🤔 huh do you have any evidence that this is fake? 🤔 show the evidence

I don’t think that’s what this video was. But if you want to chat about test pilots who at that point were pretty tired of telling the same story and same details and knowing you still have a world tour coming up…

@@erac5855 He didn't say, what he means by "press conference". However all three of them look weirdo sad all the very long time rather than tired. All three exactly same deep level of sadness. Not like any average man looks after coming back from such crazy excurision, all of them in one piece! They weren't forced to go thru many press conferences. It could be only one, or very few for sure, then no one publicly spoke a single word for years.

subhanaloda ola u uber chuslimmms

Allah?😂😂😂😂😂😂

Yes, it's called a "horizon." Amazing, huh?

@@rockethead7 Amazing is that blurry background is before horizon.

@@jazemkrzysio Depends. Are you talking about TV video? Film video? Distance to objects in the background? Apparent horizon or real horizon? What was the camera focused on? Result vary depending on details.

قم بعمل فيلم كوميدي مثلهم في الصحراء. Do a comedy movie like them in the desert. you succeed.

Sorry, the word "technology" doesn't work that way. You don't get to just say "technology" like it is supposed to mean something without clarifying. Can you name the EXACT technology you think they lacked? And, can you explain why none of the thousands of engineers who designed and built that particular technology ever realized that it wouldn't do what they designed it to do?

@@rockethead7 why are you so angry haha like you know everything 🤣

@@Sly253 😂😂

Pues ahí están las pruebas.

@@Sly253 Y tu lo sabes todo? Cual es tu fuente, la biblia? 🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡

😂 amazingly fake!

​@@FthaPoliceBut if Russia flew to the moon, you would definitely believe it 😂

"see how he is pulled up by some wire" Huh? Do you mean the communications antenna? "standing almost 45 degree to the ground." Not even close to 45 degrees. But, tell me, what angle would you stand at, while on a sloped ground, while wearing a suit and backpack that weighs more than you do? You don't think you'd be hunched forward?

It’s the PLSS VHF radio antenna, so he could communicate with his colleague on the moon and the CSM and in Houston

@@rockethead7 What Recocebo said, is kind of communication in fact. Or I'm wrong? ;-)

They never went to the moon in the first place.

Whoever said that the moon has dust like the earth. Watch as they jump how the soil scatters. They are now in the ground. They film. Lie they're in on the moon. من قال ان القمر به تراب مثل الارض. شاهد وهم يقفزون كيف تنتشر التربة. هم الآن في الأرض. هم يصورون. أكذب أنهم على القمر .

"Hard to believe" - because it never happened, ever...& never will... The world is an amazing place, why "explore" out of this world myths, when we have so much unknown on earth?? I'll wait...

There is the Artemis program. The Artemis 1 flight was launched at the end of 2022, and the spacecraft orbited the moon and returned. This was the first mission of the ongoing Artemis program. The goal of the Artemis 3 mission is to land on the moon.

Big difference between crewed and uncrewed missions. Do a little real research and find out why.

USA has always been the leader in cinematography

So, you don't know something as simple as how the camera worked, yet, you know enough to declare that the entire planet's aerospace engineers are wrong about their own expertise, and you're right?

Not film, video. Ed Fendell. I know you have heard this before. Just not sinking in yet, if ever.

Is Google down where you live?

It's amazing that there are so many uneducated people incapable of critical thought. No human has ever set foot on the lunar surface...ever.

What proof do you have that says that we did….? Some blurry old movie films?

@@Showboat_Six Over a third of a ton of moon rock is a good place to start.

@@Showboat_SixYeeeah and what those blurry old movies show.

Cuz we didn’t. Thanks

Sorry slick, no studio needed. They had ON-LOCATION access. Live from the moon.

@@nebtheweb8885 haha I don't wanna say this but I wonder sometimes with our corrupt governments we always have.....

Yeah I didnt wannaw post what I posted either...

The beauty of Apollo is that there are many non-governmental sources to confirm the program. It’s not all based on one government agency.

@@scottstevens2752We know you wanted. Put your pants on, and get ready then.

Sadly, the later Apollo missions just weren't 'important' enough for the TV networks. With no Internet then you had no other way. I watched everything I could of Apollo as a kid, but much was never shown at the time.

No human has ever set foot on the lunar surface...ever.

@@daryllect6659 Yes when our only source of information has been corrupted you pretty much cant believe what is real and what is fiction.. They have destroid morals and in its wake an honest society. Now many people dont hesitate to rewrite history even when they werent there and have no idea what they are saying.

@@daryllect6659 👎

@@daryllect6659 And what is your proof to validate your statement?

What?

mama say's I'm special..

Yes, Moon landing deniers are quite funny.

hopefully the last one remaining will live to 110!

No. It burned out 27 hours after Apollo 17 lifted off. It was never designed to survive the heat of a lunar high noon. (In the case of Apollo 17, the camera even burned out prior to high noon. The Apollo 16 camera made it to high noon, though, then burned out.) It also ran on batteries that are long dead by now.

They put their suits on before depressurizing the cabin, and took their suits off only after the cabin was repressurized. Can you tell me which video you watched that told you to ask this?

@@rockethead7 It's amazing to me such a small spacecraft could hold that much oxygen..but then again the service module was pretty awesome.

@@erichaynes7502 Small? It's like a two stairs building.

An airlock is not required for a studio on Earth.😀😀😀😀

@Mr Renics Dumbster On Marijuana Spotted😂

Not a movie, little one. It’s real life. You should try it some time. 😂

The one shot on location 240 thousand miles away where there is no atmospheric pressure, no wind, no weather, no air, nothing that would keep dust in the air like here on earth. No floating dust. Kick it up and it will stick, but it will not suspend in the air.

Well, they covered about 20 miles total across the 3 EVAs. But, to answer your question more directly, the greatest distance from the lunar module on Apollo 17 was around 4-5 miles. You can get a better understanding by looking at the Apollo 17 rover traverse map.

@@rockethead7 OK, thank you 🙂.

@@rockethead7 4-5 miles is still pretty far, though. Quite scary. Luckily you cannot really get lost because the tracks you made are still there. But what if the space suit conks out? You must always trust the equipment.

Sure, but, ya know, these guys were going to the moon, not taking a commercial airliner flight. There were risks all over the place. Most of them were test pilots (and that's not exactly a "safe" career). Prior to being an astronaut, Cernan's last job was to train for WWIII, to fly along the tree line with nuclear bombs strapped to the bottom of his plane, get to the city he was supposed to bomb, pull up into a vertical climb, release the bomb (flinging it upward), then to pull out of that at top speed and get away before the bomb blows him to smithereens. Armstrong had 78 combat missions, including one where he was shot down behind enemy lines. Aldrin had 2 combat kills under his belt. The list goes on. These guys weren't exactly afraid to take risks. The rover traverses were planned to hit the furthest point in the traverse toward the beginning of the EVA. They may have one or two stops before getting to the furthest point. But, basically, the idea was that they would first go far, then snake their way back, thus allowing the most oxygen remaining in their backpacks for the furthest distances, and would go closer and closer to the lunar module as they used their oxygen supply. What happens if there are suit problems? Well, each PLSS backpack had an OPS system on top (which included a small spare supply of oxygen, good for around 1/2 hour). They could also share air between the two astronauts if they needed. Those hoses you see on the suits could be plugged and unplugged, and if one guy's PLSS failed completely, they could share with the other one's PLSS to get back safely. The suits themselves had 13 layers of ripstop fabrics in the outer garment, plus another half dozen layers under that, including a self-sealing layer (a lot like WWII fighter planes had self-sealing fuel tanks in the wings if they get hit by bullets). And, if somehow all of that failed, they were trained on how to patch small holes. A large hole that instantly depressurizes the entire suit would render the astronaut unconscious in about 2 minutes, and dead a few more minutes after that. But, that's a lot of time (relatively) for the other astronaut to try to patch something together to pressurize his partner's suit again. And, yeah, of course, beyond that, sure, it would be fatal if none of those things worked. But, I think the engineers designed things to be more resilient than you might know (?).

@@rockethead7 You are correct. Being a test pilot is very risky. As you correctly state, all the equipment for the space missions is top-level, as well as the training of the astronauts. It is still not 100% foolproof but it is very close. The astronauts also needed a very high level of mental and emotional toughness as well. They must possess so many qualities and abilities on so many levels. They are the elite of humanity in many respects.

Was there an actual question you had?

@@rockethead7 I just like the launch effects :D

No "effects" needed. It's a field sequential slow-scan RCA camera. It results in red/blue/green "rainbowing" for any fast moving object in frame.

@@user-gq2vw8ef6o Those were the effects from the color wheel that was in the NTSE TV camera that was being remotely controlled by Ed Fendell in Houston. You see the rainbow effect of the colorwheel. They still use colorwheels in some of todays DLP movie projectors. Look it up.

Tmobile has multiple cell towers on the moon

🤫

Huh? Primative batteries? Is that like batteries for primates? Or, did you mean "primitive," but you're functionally illiterate? What's primitive about them? And, why do you think radio would have an issue with a vacuum? What ARE you talking about?

@@rockethead7 ok bad spelling . It was an honest question can you answer?

Spare me. You know nothing about radio, batteries, or the English language. You aren't asking honest questions.

absolutely inside your head...

@@KPL400And his parents basement 😂😂

No, the highest temperature is 120 Celsius. And, no Apollo mission ever landed when it was that hot. They all landed early in the lunar morning, long before the temperature got that high.

@@rockethead7 My opinion, the Apollo mission was recorded for the USSR, in the struggle for supremacy, when Gagarin flew into space.

Is that all you're capable of doing? Change topics?

@@rockethead7 I don't even want to be mistaken. And the moon is not gray. Brown is correct, just because the temperature is high during the day and the surface is red-hot like a red brick.

It's not even possible to have a dialog with someone who obviously cannot stay on topic. You opened by talking about the surface temperatures. You were wrong. I replied to correct you. Since then, all you've done is talk about other things.

you idiots don't even know how to search on the internet to find why...hmmmmm

If you expected dim stars to show up in the background of a brightly lit foreground, that's the problem right there. You don't understand photography.

Take your phone out on a clear night and take a picture of the moon. Tell me if there are stars in that photograph......

OMG how do you even dress yourself in the morning???

Research how camera exposure levels work.

What press conference would that be?